Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:7-8
Published online before print December 7, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000252663.85193.a2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/1/7    most recent
01.STR.0000252663.85193.a2v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lodder, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lodder, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Memory
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrowRelated Article

(Stroke. 2007;38:7.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

Poststroke Cognition and the Fight Against the Hard Problem

Vascular Neurologists, Enter the Arena!

Jan Lodder, MD, PhD

From the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dr Jan Lodder, Professor of Vascular Neurology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail jlod@sneu.azm.nl

See related article, pages 198–203


Key Words: cognitive impairment


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

In this issue of Stroke, Snaphaan and de Leeuw report on their results obtained from a systematic review on poststroke memory dysfunction.1 Of the 798 articles their search strategy identified, only 5 mentioned memory testing at different poststroke intervals, only 3 studies followed patients for at least 1 year, whereas the largest study contained only 196 patients. The results of the review allow at least 2 conclusions. One is drawn by the authors, in that memory dysfunction, a key element in the "diagnosis" of poststroke dementia, does not follow a linear time course after stroke. Leys et al came to a similar conclusion with regard to poststroke dementia, which was defined as any dementia after stroke.2 Short-term studies over-diagnose cognitive poststroke dysfunction. The finding warns us against making simple models of reality when it comes to poststroke cognitive impairment, and makes us aware that we should save our patients the embarrassment of early, false-positive predictions in this respect.

The second conclusion the review allows is that our current knowledge of poststroke cognitive impairment and its long-term development is rather poor, as illustrated by the review’s data on memory dysfunction, a key element in the diagnostic criteria for dementia. The poststroke dementia studies reviewed by Leys et al, although larger and with longer follow-up by some, did not provide any detail either except for the criteria that they used for the diagnosis.2 One may question the value of studying any cognitive details when we can already make diagnoses such as . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Poststroke Memory Function in Nondemented Patients: A Systematic Review on Frequency and Neuroimaging Correlates
Liselore Snaphaan and Frank-Erik de Leeuw
Stroke 2007 38: 198-203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. B. Gorelick and J. V. Bowler
Advances in Vascular Cognitive Impairment 2007
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 279 - 282.
[Full Text] [PDF]