Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:2631-2632
Published online before print August 30, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488809
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/10/2631    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.488809v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, C. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrowRelated Article

(Stroke. 2007;38:2631.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

To FAST or Not to FAST?

Corinne S. Hodgson, MSc

From the CSH Associates, Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada.

Correspondence to Corinne S. Hodgson, 378 Melores Dr, Burlington, ON, Canada L7L 4T8. E-mail corinne@cshodgson.com


Key Words: mass media • prevention • psych & behavior • public education • public policy • stroke • warning signs


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

See related article, pages 2864–2868.

In this issue of Stroke, Kleindorfer and colleagues1 report on a chart review comparing the traditional 5 "sudden" warning signs of stroke and the FAST system. FAST is based on the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and focuses on 3 symptoms: facial droop (F), arm drift (A) and speech problems (S), with "T" for "time" rounding out the acronym. As Kleindorfer and colleagues point out, the standard list of 5 warning signs was created by a committee (the Brain Attack Coalition). Although it may be neurologically sound, Kleindorfer et al suspect it does not represent best practices when talking to the general public.

But what does make for effective public education messaging? If we look at the world of advertising, there appears to be 3 underlying principles for getting messages out to people—and ensuring they are remembered. They are: (1) consistency, (2) simplicity, and (3) repetition.

Consistency

Looking at public-oriented websites of some of the major English-language stroke organizations suggests that common messaging on the warning signs of stroke follows national boundaries. The American Stroke Association (ASA),2 National Stroke Association (NSA)3 and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)4 all list the same 5 warning signs. The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada lists five,5 as does the Stroke Association of the UK (SA UK)6 but the wording differs not only from one another but from that used by the ASA, NSA and NINDS. The National Stroke Foundation (NSF) of Australia lists 6 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Designing a Message for Public Education Regarding Stroke: Does FAST Capture Enough Stroke?
Dawn O. Kleindorfer, Rosie Miller, Charles J. Moomaw, Kathleen Alwell, Joseph P. Broderick, Jane Khoury, Daniel Woo, Matthew L. Flaherty, Tarek Zakaria, and Brett M. Kissela
Stroke 2007 38: 2864-2868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. F. Lyons, A. G. Rudd, and C. Alvaro
Advances in Health Policy 2007
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 264 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Chiti, E. Giorli, and G. Orlandi
To FAST or Not to FAST: SHOUT-FAST!
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e22 - e23.
[Full Text] [PDF]