Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:249
Published online before print January 3, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.500967
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/2/249    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.500967v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrowRelated Article

(Stroke. 2008;39:249.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Plus Ça Change ...

Stephen Oppenheimer, MD, PhD

From the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn; and SMS Inc, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence to Stephen Oppenheimer, MD, PhD, 10151 York Rd, Suite 120, Cockeysville, MD 21030. E-mail soppenh@hotmail.com


Key Words: radiology


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

See related article, pages 373–378.

Stroke progression is a noteworthy phenomenon. It may manifest radiologically, clinically or as both. Several systemic upheavals contribute including cardiovascular dysregulation, blood glucose disturbances and hyperthermia to name just three.1 No previous studies, however, have really assessed whether any particular stroke location might be especially prone to progression.

In this retrospective study of 61consecutive patients innocent of reperfusion therapy, Ay et al2 show that insular infarction is more prone to radiological extension over a median of 7 days (range 4.5 to 52.5 days) than stroke excluding the insular cortex. The contributions of various confounding variables including stroke volume and vascular territory as well as age and admission blood glucose were assessed using linear regression models.

Why is the insular cortex so attractive in this regard? This previously ill-understood region is a significant site of autonomic and nociceptive representation and integration. Insular strokes are associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes including sudden death3 correlating with stroke-related cardiovascular autonomic abnormalities.4 Additionally, blood glucose dysregulation occurs significantly more frequently with insular stroke location.5 It would therefore be entirely reasonable to infer that insular stroke invokes cardiovascular and endocrine changes that compromise cerebral tissue when at its most vulnerable leading to stroke extension.

However, we do not yet know whether these radiological changes are functionally significant because no clinical assessments were reported. Additionally, whether the mechanistic explanations for stroke extension are relevant to the findings of this study is unclear. The authors did not gather . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Middle Cerebral Artery Infarcts Encompassing the Insula Are More Prone to Growth
Hakan Ay, E. Murat Arsava, Walter J. Koroshetz, and A. Gregory Sorensen
Stroke 2008 39: 373-378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]