This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/1/1    most recent STROKEAHA.108.529271v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Indredavik, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Indredavik, B. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Emergency treatment of Stroke Rehabilitation, Stroke Other Stroke Treatment - Medical Related Article

(Stroke. 2009;40:1.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorials

Stroke Unit Care Is Beneficial Both for the Patient and for the Health Service and Should Be Widely Implemented

Bent Indredavik, MD, PhD

From St. Olavs, Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Correspondence to Bent Indredavik, St. Olavs Hospital, Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail bent.indredavik@medisin.ntnu.no

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

	Introduction

 
See related article, pages 18–23.

Stroke unit (SU) care is the only treatment option for acute stroke with proven reduction of death.¹ It is also the only intervention that has shown a reduction in long-term dependency, and the majority of stroke patients benefit from this intervention.¹ Hence, SU care is by far the most important treatment for stroke patients and the only treatment of acute stroke that has a major impact on the burden of stroke.^1–3

It is important to recognize that the organization of stroke services per se plays a key role in improving the overall outcome after a stroke. Despite impressive results, the implementation of SU care is remarkably slow in many countries. A hospital survey from the United States showed that SU care was established at only 38% of the hospitals.⁴ In a registry of the Canadian Stroke Network, only 31% of stroke patients received care in an SU.⁵ Similar problems in translating knowledge into practice are also present in many other regions and countries worldwide.^6,7 It is mainly the Scandinavian countries that have implemented SUs on a large scale,⁸ especially Sweden, where >80% of all patients with acute stroke are offered SU care.

The positive effects of SU care not only are found in randomized trials but also persist when SUs are implemented in routine clinical practice.⁹ Hence, the consequences of the lack of a wide implementation of SUs are probably that many stroke patients will die unnecessarily or will become dependent and require long-term . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Related Article:

Impact of a Stroke Unit on Length of Hospital Stay and In-Hospital Case Fatality

Hai Feng Zhu, Nancy N. Newcommon, Mary Elizabeth Cooper, Teri L. Green, Barbara Seal, Gary Klein, Nicolas U. Weir, Shelagh B. Coutts, Tim Watson, Philip A. Barber, Andrew M. Demchuk, Michael D. Hill for the Calgary Stroke Program
Stroke 2009 40: 18-23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]