Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:e298-e300
Published online before print April 9, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544619
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/5/e298    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.544619v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwab, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

(Stroke. 2009;40:e298.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Advances in Stroke 2008

Advances in Critical Care and Emergency Medicine

Stephan A. Mayer, MD, FCCM Stefan Schwab, MD

From the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (S.A.M.), Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; and the Department of Neurology (S.S.), University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Correspondence to Stephan A. Mayer, MD, FCCM, Neurological Institute, 710 W 168th Street, Box 39, New York, NY 10032. E-mail sam14@columbia.edu


Key Words: advances • critical care • emergency medicine


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
In 2008, there were clinical trial advances in 3 areas that will impact on the way stroke care is practiced in the emergency department and intensive care unit (ICU). These include (1) the positive results of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III trial, extending the time window for intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke; (2) the negative results of 2 trials investigating the use of intensive insulin therapy in the ICU; and (3) new data from the Phase 2 Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial (INTERACT), investigating the role of intensive blood pressure (BP) control after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).


*    ECASS III: Breaking the Time Barrier
 
Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is still the only approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke. However, the time window for applying this therapy, which significantly reduces morbidity but not mortality, up to now has been restricted to 3 hours after symptom onset.1 Various stroke trials trying to expand this strict time window, selecting patients based on CT or MRI perfusion, and using thrombolytic agents other than recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), have up until now failed to prove efficacy regarding clinical end points.2–5 After a couple of years without any positive stroke trials, ECASS III adds on to the encouraging results of the pooled analyses of the ECASS and National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke trials,6 now expanding the time window for CT-based treatment of acute ischemic stroke up to 4.5 hours.7

The ECASS III trial randomly assigned 821 patients either to receive 0.9 mg . . . [Full Text of this Article]