This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by von Kummer, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by von Kummer, R. Related Collections CT and MRI Acute Cerebral Infarction Emergency treatment of Stroke Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Other imaging Thrombolysis Related Article

(Stroke. 2004;35:1657.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—Specificity of Stroke Imaging

Disregarded and Neglected

Rüdiger von Kummer, MD, FAHA, Guest Editor

University of Technology, Uniklinikum-Dresden, Germany

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

Brain imaging in acute stroke patients can be effective on 6 different levels:¹ (1) It will reduce health care costs, if it prevents disability and death of stroke victims. (2) Brain imaging will improve the clinical outcome of stroke patients, if it identifies the patients who benefit from specific treatment. (3) To identify these patients, brain imaging must provide relevant information that is unavailable from other sources for the appropriate choice of treatment. (4) This could be brain images that allow the exclusion of brain hemorrhage and other diseases that mimic ischemic stroke, and allow assessment of ischemic edema and perfusion disturbance, mass effect, arterial wall pathology, and obstruction. (5) The imaging modality should be sensitive and specific for stroke pathology early after symptom onset. (6) This requires the imaging modality to have the technical capacity to reliably detect the relevant stroke pathology.

In this issue, Schramm et al² compare computed tomography (CT) and MRI (MRI) techniques that assessed brain perfusion, brain water diffusion, and the resulting ischemic infarct in acute stroke patients. In a group of 22 patients, among them 9 patients without a brain infarct on follow-up CT, Schramm et al did not detect a statistical difference regarding the lesion volumes on time-to-peak (TTP) maps and on cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps provided by CT and MRI, observed no difference when comparing the lesion volumes on CT angiography (CTA) source images with the lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), and found a significant correlation when comparing the lesion volumes . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Related Article:

Comparison of Perfusion Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Angiography Source Images With Perfusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke of Less Than 6 Hours’ Duration

Peter Schramm, Peter D. Schellinger, Ernst Klotz, Kai Kallenberg, Jochen B. Fiebach, Sonja Külkens, Sabine Heiland, Michael Knauth, and Klaus Sartor
Stroke 2004 35: 1652-1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]