(Stroke. 2005;36:2062.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
From the Department of Neurology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Wash
Correspondence to W.T. Longstreth, Jr, MD, MPH, Department of Neurology, Box 359775, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104-2420. E-mail wl@u.washington.edu
Key Words: extremities vascular disease
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Work from the Leukoaraiosis and Disability (LADIS) Study Group1 and from others characterizing brain structure and function in the elderly continue to challenge myopic views of how vascular disease affects the brain. What most often demands attention and consumes resourcespatients with symptoms and signs of stroke and transient ischemic attackrepresents the easily recognized tip of the iceberg whose larger underwater mass goes largely ignored. More needs to be learned about covert vascular disease that erodes brain structure and function in ways less dramatic than overt disease.
Before sophisticated imaging revealed details of brain structure, symptoms and signs defined brain vascular disease. Postmortem examinations of the brain were limited to a select group of patients but foreshadowed the existence of substantial subclinical vascular disease.2 With the introduction of brain imaging, clinicians could characterize the structure of the brain in patients with acute symptoms and signs. Those with symptomatic brain vascular disease were often found on brain imaging to have other vascular lesions that had not caused acute symptoms. Brain imaging in some patients with reversible clinical syndromes such as transient ischemic attacks showed findings compatible with an acute infarct. Perhaps not surprisingly, such patients may have a prognosis different from those whose imaging is clean.3
As brain imaging, especially with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), of those with or without symptoms and signs of brain vascular disease became more ubiquitous, the realization grew that subclinical infarcts and white matter hyperintensities were prevalent among the elderly and likely related to ischemic vascular disease.
Related Article:
Stroke 2005 36: 2116-2120.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Fornage, Y. A. Chiang, E. S. O'Meara, B. M. Psaty, A. P. Reiner, D. S. Siscovick, R. P. Tracy, and W.T. Longstreth Jr Biomarkers of Inflammation and MRI-Defined Small Vessel Disease of the Brain: The Cardiovascular Health Study Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 1952 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Longstreth Jr and S. E. Vermeer The growing specter of MRI-defined brain infarcts Neurology, February 5, 2008; 70(6): 416 - 417. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |