| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:4.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
From the Divisions of Aging and Preventive Medicine (T.K.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; the Department of Epidemiology (T.K.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; and the Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (K.B.), University of Muenster, Germany.
Correspondence to Tobias Kurth, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave, East 3rd floor, Boston, MA 02215-1204. E-mail tkurth@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
See related article, pages 27–33
Key Words: epidemiology risk factors socioeconomic status stroke
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Several studies using different study designs and various definitions of socioeconomic status have shown that stroke incidence increases with decreasing socioeconomic status.1–8 A low socioeconomic status predicts stroke not only in poor countries but also in well-developed countries with a high standard of medical care.1,4,8 The mechanisms by which socioeconomic status influences stroke risk are not entirely understood. Potential explanations include differences in major stroke risk factors, in psychosocial factors, and in access to and use of medical care.1,5
In this issue of Stroke, Kuper and colleagues evaluate the association between socioeconomic status, as measured by years of education, and the risk of stroke in a large prospective study of Swedish women.9 In age-adjusted analyses, years of education were inversely associated with stroke risk, indicating that women in the lowest education group had an
2-fold increased risk of total stroke. Furthermore, Kuper and colleagues evaluated whether the association between socioeconomic status and stroke could be explained by established stroke risk factors as well as by psychosocial factors. The increased risk of stroke in the lower socioeconomic class attenuated to a relative risk of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.2) after adjustment for age, smoking status, body mass index, alcohol consumption, diabetes, elevated blood pressure, and exercise. This attenuation is in line with other studies that showed reduction of the relative risk estimate after adjusting for traditional stroke risk factors, particularly behavioral factors.1,8 Because information on lifestyle factors can only be measured imperfectly and information on some factors may not
Related Article:
Stroke 2007 38: 27-33.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ali, S. Atula, P. M.W. Bath, J. Grotta, W. Hacke, P. Lyden, J. R. Marler, R. L. Sacco, K. R. Lees, and for the VISTA Investigators Stroke Outcome in Clinical Trial Patients Deriving From Different Countries Stroke, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 35 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, B. Hedblad, M. Rosvall, F. Buchwald, F. A. Khan, and G. Engstrom Stroke Incidence, Recurrence, and Case-Fatality in Relation to Socioeconomic Position: A Population-Based Study of Middle-Aged Swedish Men and Women Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2191 - 2196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |