Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1995;26:2338-2346

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexis, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexis, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, B. D.

(Stroke. 1995;26:2338-2346.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Nonocclusive Common Carotid Artery Thrombosis in the Rat Results in Reversible Sensorimotor and Cognitive Behavioral Deficits

Nancy E. Alexis, MS; W. Dalton Dietrich, PhD; Edward J. Green, PhD; Ricardo Prado, MD Brant D. Watson, PhD

From the Cerebral Vascular Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and Department of Psychology (E.J.G.), University of Miami, Coral Gables, Fla.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose Microemboli released during transient ischemic attack, stroke, and cardiac surgery are thought to cause a variety of functional deficits in humans. The purpose of this study was to characterize the type and extent of neurobehavioral deficits present after photochemically induced common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT), a thromboembolic model of stroke in the rat that results in a platelet emboli shower.

Methods Thirty-two male Wistar rats were assigned to four groups. Groups 1 (n=8) and 3 (n=8) were long-term (6-week survival) and short-term (2-week survival) experimental groups subjected to right CCAT with the use of the photochemical technique. Groups 2 (n=8) and 4 (n=8) served as sham-operated controls for each experimental group. A battery of behavioral tests was applied daily beginning 24 hours after thrombosis; this consisted of elicited forelimb placing, postural reflex, beam balance, beam walking, and open field activity. Cognitive testing with a water maze task was performed on post-CCAT days 30 to 33 for groups 1 and 2 and on post-CCAT day 2 for groups 3 and 4. Ten-micrometer coronal brain sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and infarct location and frequency were determined.

Results Significant sensorimotor deficits were observed, which recovered within 2 weeks after CCAT. The data that follow are derived by combining the two experimental groups and comparing these with the two sham groups. The following tests showed significant effects after CCAT: contralateral elicited forelimb placing, ipsilateral elicited forelimb placing, beam balance, and beam walking score. Cognitive dysfunction was seen acutely (group 3 animals) at 2 days after CCAT; Morris water maze length and latency to target were significantly greater in the experimental group. No deficits were seen in postural reflex, open field activity, or delayed cognitive testing. Histopathological assessment revealed small infarcts in 11 of 16 thrombosed rats. However, a strong relationship between neurobehavioral deficits and infarct location was not consistently demonstrated.

Conclusions CCAT produces consistent sensorimotor and cognitive behavioral deficits that recover within 2 weeks of injury. Behavioral outcome was not necessarily associated with overt histopathological damage, suggesting that reversible injury mechanisms, both vascular and neuronal, may be partly responsible for the temporary loss of function. These data strengthen the role of CCAT as a clinically relevant model of thromboembolic stroke.


Key Words: behavior, animal • cerebral ischemia • cognition • stroke • rats


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The release of microemboli into the cerebral circulation is a common event after vascular thrombosis, cardiac arrest, and cardiac surgery.1 2 3 The deposition of platelet aggregates in the microvasculature often results in transient ischemic attacks and acute stroke and can cause subsequent sensory, motor, and cognitive deficits.2 Correlations have been made in cardiopulmonary bypass patients indicating that the degree of functional defects is proportional to the quantity of emboli recorded on transcranial Doppler flow studies.3

Experimental models of embolic stroke commonly use the injection of microspheres or autologous clots into a major vessel to mimic thromboembolic events.4 5 Although these models may have some utility in assessing basic ischemic pathological mechanisms and consequences, they are not based on active thrombotic processes, which have been shown experimentally to precipitate an array of microvascular and hemodynamic changes occurring after capture of cerebral emboli.6

Photochemically induced nonocclusive common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT) is a rodent model of unilateral carotid stenosis with subsequent platelet embolization.7 Hemodynamic, microvascular, and blood-brain barrier abnormalities have been observed in this model.8 9 10 11 Blood-borne factors possibly released from the forming carotid thrombus and from subsequent platelet emboli have been detected in the downstream circulation.12 13 Histopathology after CCAT shows the presence of small, focal infarcts and ischemic cells most commonly located in the ipsilateral cortex.7 9 Occasionally, platelet emboli and structural damage are also noted in the ipsilateral hippocampus, striatum, thalamus, and the contralateral cortex.7 10

The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the acute and chronic behavioral deficits seen after CCAT and to define a battery of standard tests that are sensitive to changes in functional outcome in this model. These tests will provide a measure in the screening of therapeutic strategies in the future. Particular interest was given to examining deficits typically seen clinically after thromboembolic stroke.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The experiments were performed on 32 male Wistar rats weighing between 250 and 350 g obtained from Charles River Breeders. The rats were housed individually under 12-hour light/dark cycles and were given food and water ad libitum. Rats were randomly separated into four groups of 8 animals. Groups 1 and 3 were long-term (6-week survival) and short-term (2-week survival) experimental groups, respectively, and groups 2 and 4 served as sham-operated controls (photosensitive dye injection; no laser irradiation) for each time point.

Surgery
Rats were deprived of food 12 hours before surgery. CCAT was produced with the use of the photochemical technique.7 11 12 Briefly, the animals were anesthetized with halothane, intubated, and artificially ventilated with a rodent respirator. Rats were maintained on a mixture of 70% nitrous oxide, 30% oxygen, and 1% halothane. Jugular venous and tail arterial catheters were inserted for the administration of drugs and the measurement of blood gases and blood pressure. Muscle relaxation was achieved by the injection of pancuronium bromide. Under a Zeiss operating microscope, the right common carotid artery was exposed by blunt dissection and retraction of the surrounding musculature. The vagus nerve was carefully separated from the common carotid artery, and the artery was freely suspended in a saline bath.

A tunable argon dye laser (wavelength, 562 nm; peak power, 325 mW) was focused onto the right common carotid artery for 10 minutes. Simultaneously, the photosensitizing dye rose bengal (15 mg/mL in 0.9% saline) was injected intravenously into the circulation over a period of 90 seconds. This irradiation procedure has been shown to produce 50% to 75% stenosis.13 After the irradiation, catheters were removed, wounds were sutured, and the animals were allowed to recover and return to their home cages. Body temperature was monitored throughout the procedure with a rectal probe and was maintained between 36°C and 37°C with a heating pad.

Behavioral Protocol
Each animal was handled for 3 days before testing and was trained as needed for each task. The animals were tested daily beginning 24 hours after surgery unless otherwise noted by an experimenter blinded to the experimental procedure. Since the injury after CCAT may be widespread and typically includes damage to the cortex, striatum, and hippocampus, a battery of behavioral tests was chosen to evaluate functional outcome. Each behavioral test is described in detail below.

Elicited Forelimb Placing
Forelimb placing to three separate stimuli (visual, tactile, and proprioceptive) was measured to assess sensorimotor integration.14 Visual placing is accomplished by cupping the rat in the experimenter's hands while allowing the forelimbs to dangle freely. The rat is tilted and lowered toward a tabletop. A normal rat will reach toward the table with both forelimbs extended. Visual placing is also assessed by moving the rat toward the table in a sideways direction for each side. Tactile placing is evaluated by tilting the animal's head upward at a 45° angle to the table while allowing one forelimb to dangle freely. The rat is brought toward the table's edge, and the forelimb is lightly touched; this is performed for the dorsal and the lateral surfaces of each forelimb. Normal rats will immediately place the forelimb on the table. Similarly, proprioceptive placing is accomplished by forcefully contacting the dorsal surface of each forelimb with the table edge. For each test, a score of 0 was given for normal, immediate placing. A score of 1 was given if the placing was delayed or incomplete. A score of 2 indicated absent placing. A maximum score of 10 was possible for each forelimb derived from the sum of the five scores (0 to 2) from dorsal and lateral tactile stimulation, dorsal proprioceptive stimulation, and forward and sideways visual stimulation.

Postural Reflex
This test is sensitive to damage in the cortex and striatum.15 The rat was suspended by the tail 1 m above a table top. He was slowly lowered toward the table, and his posturing was observed. A normal rat will extend both forelimbs toward the table. This behavior received a score of 0. A score of 1 was given if the rat flexed one or both forelimbs. This animal is then given the lateral push test. This involves placing the rat on a sheet of plastic-coated paper and applying lateral pressure behind the shoulders in the left and right directions. If the rat was unable to resist the force equally in both directions, he received a score of 2.

Beam Balance
Beam balance is sensitive to motor cortical insults.16 17 This task is used to assess gross vestibulomotor function by requiring a rat to balance steadily on a narrow beam. The test involves three 60-second training trials 24 hours before surgery to acquire baseline data. The apparatus consists of a 3/4-inch-wide beam, 10 inches in length, suspended 1 ft above a table top. The rat is positioned on the beam and must maintain steady posture with all limbs on top of the beam for 60 seconds. The animal's performance was rated with the scale of Clifton and colleagues,18 which ranges from 1 to 6, with a score of 1 being normal and a score of 6 indicating that the animal was unable to support itself on the beam.

Beam Walking
This is a test of sensorimotor integration specifically examining hindlimb function. The testing apparatus and rating procedures were adapted from Feeney and colleagues.16 A 1-inch-wide beam, 4 ft in length, is suspended 3 ft above the floor in a dimly lit room. At the far end of the beam is a darkened goal box with a narrow entryway. At equal distances along the beam, four 3-inch metal screws are positioned, angling away from the beam's center. A white noise generator and bright light source at the start of the beam motivate the animal to traverse the beam and enter the goal box. Once inside the goal box, the stimuli are terminated. The rat's latency to reach the goal box (in seconds) and hindlimb performance as he traversed the beam (based on a 1 to 7 rating scale) are recorded. A score of 7 indicates normal beam walking with less than 2 foot slips, and a score of 1 indicates that the rat is unable to traverse the beam in less than 80 seconds. Each rat is trained for 3 days before surgery to acquire the task and to achieve normal performance (a score of 7) on three consecutive trials. Three baseline trials are collected 24 hours before surgery, and three testing trials are recorded daily thereafter. Mean values of latency and score for each day were computed.

Open Field Activity Assay
Elevated open field activity is characteristic of hippocampally damaged animals19 20 21 22 and has been observed in animals with striatal/cortical damage as well.23 Rats are placed in a novel environment (3x3 ft) with 3-inch-square grid markings on the base. The number of times a rat crosses a grid line is recorded for a 5-minute period. The animal was tested once before surgery and on alternate days thereafter.

Morris Water Maze
This is a task that measures learning and memory in an aqueous environment. Briefly, the rat was placed in a 4-ft-diameter water tank that is visually separated into four quadrants. In the center of one quadrant, the goal quadrant, a platform is hidden 1 inch below the waterline. The rat was placed in the tank at one of four start locations (north, south, east, west) and swam for up to 60 seconds until it found the platform. Once the animal located the platform, it remained on it for 20 seconds. In the event that an animal did not locate the platform, the observer positioned the animal on the platform at the end of the 60-second swim period. During a 2- to 4-minute intertrial interval, the animals were kept warm by infrared heating lamps. The temperature of the water maze was 20±0.5°C. The latency and path length of the rat were measured by a video tracking system interfaced to a computer.

Rats from groups 1 and 2 (6 weeks; experimental and sham, respectively) were tested on a simple place task with a hidden platform at 5 weeks after CCAT for 3 days and with a visible platform for 1 day. In these animals no pretraining was given. Rats from groups 3 and 4 (2 weeks; experimental and sham, respectively) were trained with a hidden platform for 2 days before CCAT and were tested again 2 days after CCAT. Each day of testing consisted of eight randomized trials. In addition, at the end of the third day of testing for groups 1 and 2 and at the end of day 2 after CCAT for groups 3 and 4, a probe trial was given in which the platform was removed from the tank. This is designed to test whether the animal has a learned bias to navigate toward the goal quadrant or if the animal has located the hidden platform using a different approach. The percentage of time spent in the goal quadrant was recorded for each rat for a 60-second period.

Histopathology
At designated time periods (2 or 6 weeks), animals were perfusion-fixed and their brains removed for histopathological analysis. Briefly, rats were deeply anesthetized with halothane for 10 minutes and perfused transcardially with physiological saline for 2 minutes and then FAM (a mixture of 40% formaldehyde, glacial acetic acid, and methanol; 1:1:8 by volume; 20 minutes) at a pressure of 120 mm Hg. Heads were removed and stored in chilled fixative overnight. Brains were extracted and embedded in paraffin, and 10-µm sections were then prepared at 200-µm intervals for staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Semiserial sections were examined under low power (x10), and camera lucida drawings were made. From these, infarct location and quantity were tabulated.

Statistical Analysis
Data from behavioral tests were analyzed with two-way ANOVAs with treatment group and postsurgical testing day as factors. Fisher's tests were used to evaluate statistically significant post hoc comparisons. One-way ANOVA was performed on physiological variables.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Physiological variables, as shown in Table 1Down, were within normal ranges and did not differ significantly between experimental and sham groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Physiological Variables

Behavioral Outcome
Long-term (6-week) survival animals (groups 1 and 2; n=7 each) were compared, and the CCAT animals were found to recover within a 2-week period to presurgical baseline levels in all sensorimotor tests. For this reason, additional animals (groups 3 and 4; n=8 each) were allowed to survive for 2 weeks only. Behavioral data from groups 1 and 3 (experimental) and groups 2 and 4 (sham) were compared and did not differ within each condition; therefore, they were analyzed together for tests common to all groups. Two animals, one animal each from groups 1 and 2, were excluded from the final analysis for technical reasons.

Elicited Forelimb Placing
In all of the experimental animals, mild to moderate elicited forelimb placing deficits were present. These were observed in the contralateral forelimb of all CCAT rats and in the ipsilateral forelimb of 50% of CCAT rats. Statistically significant effects were seen in the contralateral forelimb when CCAT animals were compared with sham animals beginning 24 hours after thrombosis. These effects recovered within 14 days. Analyses of contralateral placing indicated significant effects of group (F1,27=26.8, P<.001), test day (F13,312=10, P<.001), and a group-by-day interaction (F13,312=8.75, P<.001). Follow-up comparisons indicated that CCAT and sham animals differed on each of the first 10 postsurgical days (Fig 1Down left).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Left, Bar graph shows left (contralateral) forelimb placing scores from experimental (EXP) and sham animals during 14 testing days after right common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT). Values shown represent mean (±SEM) for each group (n=15); higher scores indicate greater deficits. Asterisks indicate days with significant effects (**P<.05; *P<.001). Right, Bar graph shows right (ipsilateral) forelimb placing scores after CCAT. Fifty percent of thrombosed animals exhibited placing deficits bilaterally (*P<.05).

Analyses of ipsilateral placing indicated significant effects of group (F1,27=6.20, P<.02), test day (F13,351=2.78, P<.001), and a group-by-day interaction (F13,351=2.54, P<.003). Fisher's follow-up comparisons indicated that CCAT and sham animals differed on each of postsurgical testing days 1 to 7 (Fig 1Up right). In both cases, data from sham animals are not always visible since a score of 0 indicates normal placing, and most sham animals were unaffected by the surgery.

Postural Reflex
No postural reflex abnormalities were observed in CCAT or sham animals. All animals exhibited normal forelimb extension.

Beam Balance
Mild beam balance abnormalities were detected in CCAT animals compared with sham animals. Analysis of the beam balance data revealed a significant group-by-day interaction (F13,351=2.86, P<.001) as well as an effect of days (F13,351=3.27, P<.001). Follow-up comparisons indicated significant main effects of group only on day 6 (P<.015). Beam balance data are displayed in Fig 2Down.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bar graph shows beam balance scores for experimental (EXP) and sham animals after common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT). Values shown represent mean of 15 animals, and error bars indicate standard errors. A score of 1 indicates normal performance. Day 6 is only day with a significant effect (*P<.02).

Beam Walking
Beam walking latencies were normalized with respect to the animal's presurgical baseline level. Beam walking latency from CCAT animals was not statistically different from controls, although there was a trend for CCAT animals to exhibit longer latencies in traversing the beam. The beam walking score of CCAT animals was significantly albeit modestly impaired compared with sham animals for 2 weeks after CCAT. Analysis of the beam walk score revealed significant effects of treatment group (F1,27=8.49, P<.008). Post hoc comparisons indicated that the scores of CCAT and sham animals differed on each of the 14 postsurgical testing days, with the exception of days 2 and 11. Beam walking score data are presented in Fig 3Down. A hindlimb deficit was indicated by any score below 7.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Bar graph shows beam walking score data (mean±SEM) for 14 testing days after common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT) (n=15). A score of 7 indicates normal beam walking. Asterisks indicate days with significant effects (P<.05).

Open Field Activity Assay
No differences were seen in activity levels between CCAT and sham animals after thrombosis.

Morris Water Maze
Distance and latency-to-target data were normalized to presurgical levels. At 5 weeks after thrombosis, CCAT animals performed as well as sham animals on the hidden platform learning set task, visible platform test, and probe trial, as indicated by comparable latencies and lengths to target.

Acute water maze testing at 2 days after CCAT showed that retention and learning in CCAT animals were significantly impaired compared with sham animals. Latency (P<.01) and length (P<.001) to target were prolonged in CCAT rats. Fig 4Down left shows post-CCAT latency minus pre-CCAT baseline latency for experimental and control animals. Fig 4Down right is a similar bar graph of length to target. The data show that CCAT rats performed worse after surgery, with a higher average latency and length to target than presurgical levels and compared with sham animals. The performance of sham animals improved, as indicated by a negative length and latency value. A strong trend (P=.058) existed for CCAT animals to spend less time in the goal quadrant during the probe trial than CCAT animals, although this did not reach statistical significance as defined in the other tasks (P<.05).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Left, Bar graph shows water maze latency data normalized to presurgical baseline levels for experimental (EXP) and sham animals 2 days after common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT). Mean (±SEM) latency to target is presented for groups 1 and 2 (n=8 each) (P<.05, ANOVA). Right, Bar graph shows water maze length to target data normalized to presurgical baseline levels at 2 days after CCAT. Mean (±SEM) length in centimeters is displayed for group 1 and 2 animals. (P<.05, ANOVA).

A postsurgical motor defect that may have resulted in the rats' inability to perform in the water maze task was ruled out by comparing swim speeds before and after CCAT in those animals tested acutely and by comparing swim speeds of sham to experimental animals in those tested chronically (where no presurgery testing was performed). These did not significantly differ for any of the groups (data not shown).

In summary, nonocclusive CCAT in the rat produces consistent, mild to moderate sensory, fine and gross motor, and acute cognitive neurobehavioral deficits. The sensorimotor deficits are transient and recover within 2 weeks. CCAT, by the photochemical technique, does not result in long-term learning and memory deficits, postural reflex abnormalities, or open field hyperactivity.

Histopathology
Histopathological changes were observed in 11 of 16 CCAT animals but in no sham animals. As shown in Table 2Down, the majority of small embolic infarcts were seen in the ipsilateral cortex and occasionally in the ipsilateral hippocampus; no damage was observed in the brain stem or thalamus. The number of brain regions exhibiting neuronal damage varied between animals; as few as one infarct was documented in one animal, while another rat presented with a total of 14. In general, the pattern of injury was not different between short- and long-term survival animals, although the number of observable infarcts was considerably less at 6 weeks than at 2 weeks.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characterization of Histopathology

Fig 5Down summarizes the histopathological characteristics of the lesions 2 or 6 weeks after CCAT. At 2 weeks after CCAT (Fig 5ADown through 5C), infarcts were generally well demarcated and contained reactive astrocytes and macrophages. In some cases damage was more subtle, and selective neuronal necrosis was detected (Fig 5CDown). At 6 weeks after CCAT, infarcts appeared shrunken and at times difficult to visualize at low power (Fig 5DDown). Within the hippocampus, multiple sites of injury were occasionally seen. In some cases damage to the pyramidal cell layer as well as the dentate gyrus was observed (Fig 5EDown and 5FDown).



View larger version (205K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Paraffin sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin show histopathological damage after common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT). A and B, Cortical infarct (arrowhead) within right forelimb region 2 weeks after CCAT. C, Diffuse neuronal damage (asterisks) within forelimb region 2 weeks after CCAT. D, Small cortical infarct (arrowhead) within deep layer 6 of forelimb region at 6 weeks after CCAT. E, Hippocampal damage restricted to the pyramidal cell layer (arrowhead) and dentate gyrus (asterisk) at 2 weeks after CCAT. F, Selective neuronal necrosis overlying the pyramidal cell layer (arrowheads) 2 weeks after CCAT. Magnification x90 (A, C, E) and x230 (B, D, F).

Brain/Behavior Relationships
As noted previously, there existed considerable variability in the histopathology observed after CCAT. On the other hand, the behavioral data appeared surprisingly consistent. Since strong relationships could not be determined by evaluating the overall outcome of the groups, we decided to examine specific animals for behavioral/histopathological correlations. The animals chosen were those in which extremes in neurobehavioral outcome or pathology were observed. Animal numbers refer to those in Table 2Up.

The most significant histopathology in group 1, 5 infarcts at 6 weeks after thrombosis, was seen in animal 4. Although the damage affected the forelimb cortex and hippocampus, the sensorimotor outcome in this animal was not noticeably different from others in the group, and the water maze function at 5 weeks was not affected.

Animal 6 in group 1 (not included in table) did not have any observable damage on hematoxylin and eosin staining. The rat possessed moderate contralateral placing deficits persisting for 7 days and mild beam balance and beam walking abnormalities that recovered in 4 and 2 days, respectively. As in animal 4, no cognitive deficits were observed at 5 weeks. This animal is an example of the presence of transient sensorimotor dysfunction in the absence of overt histopathology.

Interestingly, animal 1 in group 3 (2-week survival), with multiple infarcts in the cortex, hippocampus, and striatum, had the most robust and prolonged forelimb placing deficits of all animals tested, with recovery only at day 14. In this same animal, beam balance and beam walk abnormalities were mild, but recovery was again not complete until day 13. Water maze deficits were present, as they were in all animals of group 2, but these did not deviate greatly from the mean values.

Animal 6 in group 3 had only three observable injury areas: two in the cortex and one in the hippocampus. This animal had sensorimotor deficits (beam and placing) very close to the reported means, but somewhat surprisingly, the water maze performance was the worst of 8 animals tested (latency to target, 32.97 seconds; length to target, 1452.84 cm).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The data from this study demonstrate that photochemically induced nonocclusive CCAT leads to mild neurobehavioral deficits that normalize over a 14-day period. Sensorimotor deficits were seen in all thrombosed rats; in all those tested acutely, cognitive deficits were present. While the most robust neurobehavioral changes were associated with the thrombosed hemisphere, significant abnormalities were also detected within the contralateral hemisphere. The description of the neurobehavioral correlates of CCAT is important because a major goal of stroke therapy is to prevent the neurological consequences of stroke and to restore brain function after injury. Our analysis indicates that a battery of diverse behavioral tasks is useful to fully characterize the functional status of the rat after CCAT. This model of thromboembolic stroke should be advantageous in the study of injury mechanisms underlying neurobehavioral impairments and in the evaluation of pharmacological therapeutic interventions.

Previous studies of photochemically induced thrombosis have demonstrated that CCAT leads to subsequent platelet embolization to the brain.7 10 24 Ultrastructural studies have detected platelet emboli within pial and parenchymal arterioles immediately after CCAT,9 25 while autoradiographic images of indium-labeled platelets have demonstrated widespread platelet accumulation throughout the thrombosed hemisphere as early as 15 minutes after thrombosis.10 24 Thus, occlusive platelet emboli originating at the site of the injured carotid artery have been implicated in the histopathological changes associated with this thrombotic model. In this regard, regional cerebral blood flow studies using [14C]iodoantipyrine have demonstrated multiple ischemic foci 30 minutes after CCAT.8 Thus, some of the neurobehavioral consequences of CCAT reported in the present study would be expected to have resulted from structural damage induced by occlusive platelet emboli.

In the present study left (contralateral) elicited forelimb placing deficits were observed in all thrombosed rats. Histopathological assessment of these rats showed that 10 of the 16 thrombosed rats demonstrated damage within the right cortical forelimb region. In a previous indium-labeled platelet study, CCAT was shown to lead to platelet accumulation commonly within the vascular boundary zones between the anterior and middle cerebral artery territories.10 Importantly, this boundary zone partially overlaps the deep layers of the cortical forelimb area in the rat.26 It has been demonstrated that these deep cortical layers, particularly layer V, are critical in forelimb placing reactions.14 It is also known from clinical studies that boundary zone (ie, watershed) areas are a common site of cerebral infarction.27 28 Thus, although this thromboembolic model results in a shower of platelet emboli, the cortical forelimb region appears to be selectively capable of sequestering emboli and thus is vulnerable to CCAT injury.

Recent experimental studies, including autoradiographic studies after photochemically induced CCAT, have shown that platelet accumulation is largely transient and not necessarily associated with overt histopathological damage.10 29 For example, in baboons, evidence for transient platelet accumulation after the intracarotid infusion of 111In-labeled platelets has been reported.29 Of particular interest to the present discussion was the finding that focal neurological function was temporarily impaired after the intracarotid infusion of labeled platelets, as shown by the ipsilateral loss of somatosensory evoked potentials.29 However, neuropathological examination of these animals failed to show detectable thrombotic occlusion or parenchymal damage. In clinical studies in which transcranial Doppler techniques are used to assess possible vascular perturbations during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery or in patients at risk for stroke, a high incidence of embolization has been reported.30 31 32 33 34 Interestingly, these patients can present with neurological symptoms that are not associated with obvious structural damage.

While histopathological correlates to the forelimb deficits were seen in the present study, similar structural-functional relationships were not seen in regard to other neurobehavioral tasks. For example, although cognitive dysfunction was seen to varying degrees in all thrombosed rats tested at 2 days after CCAT, overt hippocampal injury was documented in only 4 of 16 rats. This apparent lack of a hippocampal histopathological correlate to abnormal water maze performance has previously been shown in various models of cerebral ischemia and head trauma.35 36 For example, after fluid percussion brain injury in rats, which results in prolonged cognitive dysfunction, histopathological damage to the hippocampus is not necessary for the presence of water maze deficits.35

Although water maze performance is classically related to the hippocampus, other structures, including the cortex and striatum, may also be involved.37 38 It is therefore possible that damage to other brain regions or white matter tracts may have participated in the cognitive disturbances seen after CCAT. Lesions encompassing mainly the frontal and parietal cortices have been shown to produce a deficit in a water maze task.37 38 Interruption of the cortico-hippocampal circuitry due to local changes in blood flow39 and overexcitation of these inputs with concomitant excitatory neurotransmitter release35 have also been associated with water maze performance deficits. Regardless of the exact mechanisms underlying this dysfunction, the present data indicate that CCAT leads to learning and retention deficits in the rat that have clinical correlates.3

Acute microvascular abnormalities induced by platelet embolization or by the release of blood-borne factors from the carotid thrombus might also have participated in some of the behavioral deficits described in this study. For example, widespread blood-brain barrier dysfunction and elevated plasma serotonin levels are early consequences of CCAT.9 12 13 Since an intact blood-brain barrier is necessary for normal neuronal function,40 transient failure of the blood-brain barrier might allow blood-borne neuroactive substances to gain access to extravascular pools and thereby affect neuronal function. In addition, there also exists the possibility that CCAT induced sublethal neuronal injury that was not detectable by light microscopic analysis. Ultrastructural studies will therefore be necessary to determine whether fine structural abnormalities within selective neuronal populations correlate with any of the behavioral consequences of CCAT.

While the majority of neurobehavioral deficits were associated with the right thrombosed hemisphere, ipsilateral forelimb placing deficits were also detected in 50% of the thrombosed rats. With the presence of significant group differences between thrombosed and control rats, this indicates that unilateral carotid thrombosis can influence the function of the contralateral hemisphere. Interestingly, in a previous autoradiographic study a low frequency of indium-labeled platelets was identified in the contralateral cerebral cortex 15 minutes after CCAT and was commonly seen within the boundary zone of the anterior and middle cerebral artery territories.10 In the present study small infarcts within the contralateral cortex were identified in only 3 of 16 rats. Thus, platelet embolization to the contralateral hemisphere may be partly responsible for the ipsilateral forelimb placing deficits seen in our study.

By 14 days after CCAT, the neurobehavioral abnormalities had disappeared. The transient nature of these abnormalities is consistent with the observation that in a rat model of microsphere-induced embolic stroke, sensorimotor abnormalities also were significantly attenuated by 14 days.41 The observation of reversible behavioral abnormalities after brain injury is common to many rodent models.36 42 43 44 For example, after middle cerebral artery occlusion in normotensive rats, neurobehavioral deficits including reflex and sensorimotor function deficits recover to preoperative levels by day 30 after ischemia in rats with large cortical infarcts.36 Significant recovery occurs in most stroke patients during the initial months after injury.45 46 Potential recovery mechanisms after brain injury include plasticity and circuit reorganization as well as the normalization of function in remote regions not structurally damaged (ie, diaschisis).47 Even though it appears that CCAT does not truly duplicate the rapid recovery of neurological deficits by which transient ischemic attack is characterized, CCAT may ultimately represent a clinically relevant model of mild thromboembolic stroke that can be used to investigate this important research area.

To our knowledge, a thromboembolic stroke model has not previously been described with respect to functional outcome with a variety of tasks such as we have employed. As a result of the variable nature of such injury models, it is generally assumed that inconsistent morphology and unpredictable dysfunction will occur. Although the patterns of embolic infarction after CCAT were indeed diffuse and varied considerably across animals, we were able to demonstrate a consistent series of deficits that normalized within 2 weeks. While in some animals neurobehavioral deficits were correlated with structural abnormalities, this was not necessarily true in all cases. With the combination of neurobehavioral and histopathological outcome measures, CCAT may be valuable in the screening of therapeutic strategies relating to the treatment of thromboembolic stroke.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by US Public Health Service grants NS-27127, NS-23244, and NS-05820. The authors wish to thank Susan Kraydieh and Marcilia Halley for expert technical assistance. Nancy Alexis is a member of the Neuroscience Program at the University of Miami.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Nancy E. Alexis, MS, Department of Neurology (D4-5), University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101.

Received May 4, 1995; revision received August 17, 1995; accepted September 13, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Barbut D, Hinton RB, Szatrowski TP, Hartman GS, Bruefach M, Williams-Rasso P, Charlson ME, Gold JP. Cerebral emboli detected during bypass surgery are associated with clamp removal. Stroke. 1994;25:2398-2402. [Abstract]
  2. Cerebral Embolism Task Force. Cardiogenic brain embolism. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:71-84. [Abstract]
  3. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrison M, Newman S. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393-1399. [Abstract]
  4. Russell D, Madden KP, Clark WM, Sandset PM, Zivin JA. Detection of arterial emboli using Doppler ultrasound in rabbits. Stroke. 1991;22:253-258. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schvier FJ, Vise WM, Hossman K-A. Cerebral microembolization, II: morphological studies. Arch Neurol. 1978;35:264-270. [Abstract]
  6. Dietrich WD, Prado R, Watson BD. Pathway-dependent therapeutic windows for mitigating the pathophysiology of thromboembolic stroke. In: Krieglstein J, Oberpichler-Schwenk H, eds. Pharmacology of Cerebral Ischemia. Stuttgart, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbh; 1994:565-574.
  7. Futrell N, Watson BD, Dietrich WD, Prado R, Millikan C, Ginsberg MD. A new model of embolic stroke produced by photochemical injury to the carotid artery in the rat. Ann Neurol.. 1988;23:251-257. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Dietrich WD, Prado R, Watson BD, Busto R, Ginsberg MD. Hemodynamic consequences of common carotid artery thrombosis and thrombogenically activated blood in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:957-965. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Dietrich WD, Prado R, Halley M, Watson BD. Microvascular and neuronal consequences of common carotid artery thrombosis and platelet embolization in rats. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol.. 1993;52:351-360. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Dietrich WD, Dewanjee S, Prado R, Watson BD, Dewanjee MK. Transient platelet accumulation in rat brain after common carotid artery thrombosis: an 111In-labeled platelet study. Stroke. 1993;24:1534-1540. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Watson BD, Dietrich WD, Prado R, Ginsberg MD. Argon laser-induced arterial photothrombosis. J Neurosurg. 1987;66:748-754. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wester P, Prado R, Watson BD, Globus MY-T, Leistra H, Dietrich WD. Measurement of serotonin in plasma by in vivo microdialysis during photochemically induced thrombosis: methodological aspects. In: Globus MY-T, Dietrich WD, eds. The Role of Neurotransmitters in Brain Injury. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1992:153-159.
  13. Wester P, Dietrich WD, Prado R, Watson BD, Globus MY-T. Serotonin release into plasma during common carotid artery thrombosis. Stroke. 1992;23:870-875. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. DeRyck M, Van Reempts J, Duytschaever H, Van Deuren B, Clincke G. Neocortical localization of tactile and proprioceptive limb placing reactions in the rat. Brain Res. 1992;573:44-60. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Bederson JB, Pitts LH, Tsuji M, Nishimura MC, Davis RL, Bartkowski H. Rat middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation of the model and development of a neurologic examination. Stroke. 1986;17:472-486. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Law WA. Amphetamine, haloperidol and experience interact to affect the rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science. 1982;217:855-857. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Goldstein LB, Davis JN. Influence of lesion size and location on amphetamine accelerated recovery of beam-walking in rats. Behav Neurosci. 1990;104:318-325.
  18. Clifton GL, Jiang JY, Lyeth BG, Jenkins LW, Hamm RJ, Hayes RL. Marked protection by moderate hypothermia after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:114-121. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Colbourne F, Corbett D. Delayed and prolonged post-ischemic hypothermia is neuroprotective in the gerbil. Brain Res. 1994;654:265-272. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Jarrard LE. The hippocampus and motivation. Psych Bull. 1973;79:1-12. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kimble D. The effects of bilateral hippocampal injury in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol.. 1963;56:273-283. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Mileson BE, Schwartz RD. The use of locomotor activity as a behavioral screen for neuronal damage following transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils. Neurosci Lett. 1991;128:71-76. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Robinson RG, Coyle JT. Differential behavioral and biochemical effects of right and left hemispheric cerebral infarction in the rat. Science. 1979;205:707-710. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Dietrich WD, Miller LP, Prado R, Dewanjee S, Alexis N, Dewanjee MK, Gruber H. Acadesine reduces indium-labeled platelet deposition after photothrombosis of the common carotid artery in rats. Stroke. 1995;26:111-116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Futrell N, Riddle JM. The ultrastructure of photochemically induced thrombi with embolization in a rat model. Stroke. 1993;24:1983-1992. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Zilles K. The Cortex of the Rat. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1985.
  27. Brierley JB, Graham DI. Hypoxia and vascular disorders of the central nervous system. In: Adams JH, Corsellis JAN, Duchan LW, eds. Greenfield's Neuropathology. New York, NY: Wiley-Medical; 1984;126-207.
  28. Coyle P. Spatial relations of dorsal anastomoses and lesion boundary after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 1987;18:1133-1140. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kessler C, Kelly AB, Suggs WD, Weissman JD, Epstein CM, Hanson SR, Harker LA. Induction of transient neurological dysfunction in baboons by platelet microemboli. Stroke. 1992;23:697-702. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Blauth CL, Arnold JV, Schulenberg WE, McCartney AC, Kohner EM, Taylor KM. Cerebral microembolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95:668-676. [Abstract]
  31. Spencer MP, Thomas GI, Nicholls SC, Sauvage LR. Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Stroke. 1990;21:415-423. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Padayachee TS, Parsons S, Theobald R, Linley J, Gosling R, Deverall P. The detection of microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass: a transcranial Doppler ultrasound investigation using membrane and bubble oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44:298-302. [Abstract]
  33. Hennerici HG. Can carotid endarterectomy be improved by neurovascular monitoring? Stroke. 1993;24:637-638. [Free Full Text]
  34. Tegeler CH, Hitchings LP, Leighton VJ, Burke GL, Downes TR, Stump DA, Fredericks RK. Carotid ultrasound emboli monitoring in stroke: initial experience. J Neuroimaging.. 1991;1:61. Abstract.
  35. Hamm RJ, Dixon CE, Gbadebo DM, Singha AK, Jenkins LW, Lyeth BG. Cognitive deficits following traumatic brain injury produced by controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9:11-20. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Markgraf CG, Green EJ, Hurwitz BE, Morikawa E, Dietrich WD, McCabe PM, Ginsberg MD, Schneiderman N. Sensorimotor and cognitive consequences of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Res. 1992;575:238-246. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Attella MJ, Hoffman SW, Pilotte MP, Stein DG. Effects of BIM-22015, an analog of ACTH4-10, on functional recovery after frontal cortex injury. Behav Neural Biol.. 1992;57:157-166. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Garofolo L, Elliott PJ, Cuello AC. Behavioral response of rats with cortical lesions to cholinomimetics. Physiol Behav.. 1992;52:971-977. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Jaspers RM, Block F, Heim C, Sontag KH. Spatial learning is affected by transient occlusion of common carotid arteries (2VO): comparison of behavioral and histopathological changes after `2VO' and `four vessel occlusion' in rats. Neurosci Lett. 1990;117:149-153. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Betz AL, Goldstein GW, Katzman R. Blood-brain-cerebrospinal fluid barriers. In: Siegel GJ, ed. Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular, and Medical Aspects. 5th ed. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1994:681-699.
  41. Lyden PD, Zivin JA, Chabolla DR, Jacobs MA, Gage FH. Quantitative effects of cerebral infarction on spatial learning in rats. Exp Neurol.. 1992;116:122-132. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Grabowski M, Brundin P, Johansson BB. Paw-reaching, sensorimotor, and rotational behavior after brain infarction in rats. Stroke. 1993;24:83-89.
  43. Hurwitz BE, Dietrich WD, McCabe PM, Alonso O, Watson BD, Ginsberg MD, Schneiderman N. Amphetamine promotes recovery from sensory-motor integration deficit after thrombotic infarction of the primary somatosensory rat cortex. Stroke. 1991;22:648-654. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Markgraf CG, Green EJ, Watson B, McCabe PM, Schneiderman N, Dietrich WD, Ginsberg MD. Recovery of sensorimotor function after distal middle cerebral artery photothrombotic occlusion in rats. Stroke. 1994;25:153-159. [Abstract]
  45. Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi M-J, Laaksonen R, Lempinen M. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome. Stroke. 1984;15:1039-1044. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Langton Hewer RL, Wood VA. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.. 1983;46:5-8. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Johansson BB, Grabowski M. Functional recovery after brain infarction: plasticity and neural transplantation. Brain Pathol.. 1994;4:85-95. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. D. Dietrich, G. Danton, A. C. Hopkins, R. Prado, and W. Pearce
Thromboembolic Events Predispose the Brain to Widespread Cerebral Infarction After Delayed Transient Global Ischemia in Rats • Editorial Comment
Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 855 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexis, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexis, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, B. D.