(Stroke. 1995;26:682-687.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md; and Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Ill (R.F.G.).
Correspondence to Robert W. McPherson, MD, Meyer 8-138, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We compared the effects of two levels of
hypercapnia, defined as PCO2 of
70 mm Hg
(high-CO2 group, n=5) and PCO2 of
50 mm Hg (moderate-CO2 group, n=6), on increases in
regional cerebral blood flow (microspheres) before and after inhibition
of nitric oxide synthase with
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME; 60 mg · kg-1) in isoflurane-anesthetized
cynomolgus monkeys (1.0% end-tidal concentration).
Results Before L-NAME administration, hypercapnia increased flow in all regions (eg, forebrain: high-CO2 group, 69±10 to 166±15 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1; moderate-CO2 group, 49±7 to 93±15 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1) and decreased cerebral vascular resistance (high-CO2, 1.1±0.1 to 0.4±0.1 mm Hg · mL-1 · min · 100 g; moderate-CO2, 1.4±0.1 to 0.7±0.1 mm Hg · mL-1 · min · 100 g). During normocapnia, L-NAME decreased cerebral blood flow (high-CO2, 37±9%; moderate-CO2, 40±6%) and increased cerebral vascular resistance (high-CO2, 93±33%; moderate-CO2, 88±20%). After L-NAME, hypercapnia still increased blood flow in all regions (eg, forebrain: high-CO2, 56±7 to 128±3 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1; moderate-CO2, 36±5 to 57±8 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1) and decreased vascular resistance (high-CO2, 1.5±0.1 to 0.6±0.1 mm Hg · mL-1 · min · 100 g; moderate-CO2, 2.0±0.3 to 1.2±0.1 mm Hg · mL-1 · min · 100 g). In both groups L-NAME attenuated hypercapnia hyperemia by approximately 30% in cortex but not in other regions.
Conclusions Nitric oxide contributes to basal vascular tone but is not a major contributor to the mechanism of hypercapnia-induced cerebral vasodilation, except in cortex, in primates.
Key Words: cerebral blood flow hypercapnia nitric oxide oxygen monkeys
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was designed to determine whether inhibition of NOS
alters basal cerebral vascular tone and inhibits the cerebral vascular
response to two levels of hypercapnia in primates.
N
-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME) was used as an inhibitor of NOS. Cerebral oxygen consumption
(CMRO2) was measured to determine whether any change in
basal cerebral vascular tone or alteration in cerebral vascular
response to hypercapnia could be accounted for by alteration in brain
metabolism.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The animal was turned prone, and a catheter was placed in the sagittal sinus for withdrawal of cerebral venous blood and measurement of sagittal sinus pressure. Arterial and sagittal sinus pressure transducers were referenced to the right atrium. Pressures were measured with Statham P23 Db transducers and recorded on a Gould-Brush polygraph. A thermistor was placed 3 mm into the parietal lobe through a burr hole, and temperature was maintained at 37.5±0.2°C with heating lamps. Arterial blood glucose level was measured with a Yellow Springs Glucose Analyzer (YSI model 2300). Glucose-containing solutions were administered in animals with serum glucose levels <60 mg · dL-1. Arterial and sagittal sinus blood PO2, PCO2, and pH levels were measured at 37°C immediately after withdrawal using a Radiometer ABL3 analyzer. Oxygen saturation and hemoglobin were measured spectrophotometrically with a Radiometer hemoximeter OSM3. Arterial and cerebral venous oxygen contents were calculated from the measured oxygen saturation and hemoglobin concentration and corrected for dissolved oxygen. CMRO2 was calculated by multiplying the arterial-to-cerebrovenous oxygen content difference by the forebrain cerebral blood flow (CBF). Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as MABP-sagittal sinus pressure. CVR was calculated by dividing CPP by forebrain CBF. CBF was measured with radiolabeled microspheres (16±0.5 µm in diameter; Dupont-NEN Products) using the reference withdrawal method.17 Six radiolabels were used and injected in random sequence (153Gd, 114mIn, 113Sn, 103Ru, 95Nb, and 46Sc). Regional blood flow was determined in the cortex (1 mmx10 mmx10 mm superficial slice), forebrain (cerebral hemispheres), caudate nucleus (as an example of a region of subcortical gray matter), periventricular white matter, hindbrain (brain stem and diencephalon), and cerebellum.
Baseline data were obtained during normocapnia after 1 hour of
anesthesia. CO2 was then introduced into the inspiratory
limb of the ventilator, and a second set of data was obtained 10
minutes after end-tidal CO2 had reached a plateau. At the
end of the hypercapnic measurement (moderate-CO2 group,
PCO2 of
50 mm Hg; high-CO2
group, PCO2 of
70 mm Hg), supplemental
CO2 was discontinued, and a third set of data was obtained
15 minutes after the end-tidal CO2 tension had returned to
baseline.18 L-NAME (60 mg · kg-1) was
then administered intravenously over 10 minutes, during which time
blood was removed to prevent increases in MABP. We have found that this
dose of L-NAME is necessary to reliably reduce cortical NOS
activity by >90%.19 In the high-CO2 group
(n=5), a fourth set of data was obtained 20 minutes after the end of
L-NAME administration during normocapnia; in the
moderate-CO2 group (n=6), the fourth set of data was
obtained during normocapnia 60 minutes after the end of L-NAME
administration. CO2 was again introduced into the
inspiratory limb of the ventilator, and a fifth set of data was
obtained 10 minutes after end-tidal CO2 had reached a
plateau in both groups.
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. ANOVA for within (time) subjects
design was used to compare regional CBF, blood gas levels, and
hemodynamic variables during the measurement periods. The
Student-Newman-Keuls test was used to correct for multiple comparisons.
Because standard deviation increased with the mean value, a logarithmic
transformation was performed on regional CBF and CVR data before data
analysis. A paired t test was used to determine whether
the changes in CBF and CVR that occurred with hypercapnia were
different before and after administration of L-NAME. P
.05
was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
70 mm Hg in the high-CO2 group;
PCO2 of
50 mm Hg in the
moderate-CO2 group) with an associated decrease in pH was
achieved before and after L-NAME.
|
Before L-NAME administration (Table 2
), hypercapnia
increased blood flow in both groups in the cerebellum, hindbrain,
caudate nucleus, forebrain, and cortex but not in white matter. L-NAME
decreased flow in the cerebellum (high-CO2 group, 32±8%;
moderate-CO2 group, 45±6%), hindbrain
(high-CO2, 37±5%; moderate-CO2,
36±7%), caudate nucleus (high-CO2, 25±5%;
moderate-CO2, 16±8%), forebrain
(high-CO2, 37±9%; moderate-CO2,
40±7%), and cortex (high-CO2, 26±8%;
moderate-CO2, 27±5%) compared with the immediately
preceding preL-NAME normocapnic value (normocapnia before L-NAME
versus normocapnia after L-NAME). After L-NAME, blood flow was
increased by hypercapnia in the cerebellum, hindbrain, caudate nucleus,
forebrain, and cortex in both groups. The cerebral cortex was the only
region that demonstrated an attenuation in hypercapnic vasodilation
after L-NAME administration (Fig 1
).
|
|
Before L-NAME administration, CVR decreased with hypercapnia and
returned to baseline values with the return to normocapnia in both
groups (Fig 2
). Administration of L-NAME resulted in
substantially increased cerebrovascular tone in both groups. After
administration of L-NAME, the absolute decrease in CVR with hypercapnia
(CVRnormocapnia-CVRhypercapnia) was similar to
that observed before L-NAME ([in
mm Hg · mL-1 · min · 100 g]
high-CO2 group: preL-NAME, 0.6±0.1; postL-NAME,
0.9±0.2; moderate-CO2 group: preL-NAME, 0.8±0.1;
postL-NAME, 0.9±0.2). Baseline CMRO2 was similar between
groups and was not changed by hypercapnia or L-NAME in either group,
indicating an appropriate and stable plane of general anesthesia.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We chose a dose of L-NAME that would inhibit brain NOS activity by >90% in these primates. In dogs we previously found that 40 mg · kg-1 was required to meet this goal.20 In one monkey (not included in this study), we found that 40 mg · kg-1 L-NAME suppressed NOS activity to approximately 20% of baseline. Therefore, in the animals in this study, we used a larger dose of L-NAME to completely suppress enzyme activity. Subsequent determination of NOS activity in monkeys that received 60 mg · kg-1 indicated >90% suppression of NOS activity.19 This finding was not surprising to us because we have also found differences in other species in sensitivity for inhibition of NOS activity by L-NAME. For example, 10 mg · kg-1 L-NAME inhibits NOS activity by >90% in cats,21 whereas 50 mg · kg-1 L-NAME is required in piglets for the same degree of inhibition.15
The increase in cerebrovascular tone observed in this study after inhibition of NOS is consistent with that seen in several other studies. For example, in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats1 and piglets,3 NG-monomethyl-L-arginine significantly reduced CBF. Likewise, a reduction in CBF was observed after NOS inhibition with NG-nitro-L-arginine in chloralose- and urethane-anesthetized cats.22 Consistent with the effect of NOS inhibition on CBF is the finding that topically applied NG-monomethyl-L-arginine produced concentration-related constriction of pial vessels that was greatest in larger vessels.2 The source for NO production may be endothelium, perivascular neurons, astrocytes, or cortical neurons.7 23 24 25 26 27
In our study, L-NAME caused a substantial decrease in CBF in both groups and therefore alteration in cerebral vascular tone. Under these conditions it is difficult to make comparisons for the absolute change in CBF before and after L-NAME administration because there is a large change in vascular tone, reflected by the large difference in CVR. For example, there may be different amounts of flow-mediated dilation with different vascular tones.28 Therefore, we chose to compare pre and postL-NAME values, during hypercapnia, as the absolute change in CVR. Using this analysis, there was no difference in response to hypercapnia between values before and after L-NAME in either group. Regional hypercapnic CBF response also was not different before and after L-NAME, except for a modest decrease in cortex response. Others have also demonstrated a greater sensitivity of cortex regarding the effect of NOS inhibition on regional CBF response to hypercapnia.29 The modest decrease in hypercapnic CBF response in cortex after L-NAME in the present study may partially account for the observed reduced CBF response to hypercapnia in studies using laser-Doppler flowmetry to measure CBF. These studies are unable to measure the effect of L-NAME on hypercapnia-induced changes in regional CVR and may overestimate the role of NO in hypercapnia-induced cerebral vasodilation. We conclude that, in primates, if alteration in baseline cerebral vascular tone is taken into account, there is little support for a major role of NO in the mechanism of hypercapnic cerebral vasodilation, except perhaps for in the cortex.
A preliminary report in primates suggests that intra-arterial administration of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine completely blocked the CBF response to hypercapnia.30 However, this study is difficult to compare with ours because the isoflurane concentration, the method of measurement of CBF, the time of hypercapnic response after NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, the degree of NOS inhibition, and the control of other important physiological variables (eg, CPP, PO2, brain temperature) are not indicated.
It is possible that in our study L-NAME did not attenuate the cerebral vascular effect of hypercapnia because of incomplete inhibition of NOS. This is unlikely, since we have demonstrated >90% inhibition of NOS with this dose of L-NAME in monkeys during the time course that was used in this study in the high-CO2 group.19 Our results differ from a recent study in rats by Iadecola and Zhang31 using laser-Doppler flowmetry, which showed that the attenuation of hypercapnic vasodilation is increased over time after administration of a blocker of NOS and is dependent on the level of hypercapnia. We found a similar level of vasodilation with a delay of either 20 or 60 minutes after administration of L-NAME. Likewise, in dogs L-NAME did not attenuate the cerebral vascular effect of hypercapnia in any region other than cortex at a dose of 40 mg · kg-1, which also inhibits NOS by >90%.16 To the contrary, none of the studies that demonstrate attenuated cerebral vascular response to hypercapnia after administration of an NOS inhibitor documented the degree of inhibition of NOS with the dose of inhibitor used. Therefore, it is not possible to determine whether the difference between studies is due to a difference in degree of NOS inhibition.
It is not likely that the general lack of effect of L-NAME on hypercapnic CBF response is due to insufficient time for L-NAME to inhibit NOS: we have found that this dose of L-NAME produced >90% inhibition of NOS in primates over the same time course as in these experiments.19 In addition, a similar degree of normocapnic flow decrease by L-NAME was seen in both groups despite a longer delay for CBF measurement in the moderate-CO2 group. We found a decrease in normocapnic flow after L-NAME that was similar to that found by Iadecola and Xu in rats32 ; however, they found a 78% decrease in hypercapnic flow after L-NAME, whereas we found residual hypercapnic flow of 60% (high-CO2 group) and 48% (moderate-CO2 group). In the present study, only cortex demonstrated a modest decrease in percent change in CBF after administration of L-NAME. This effect of L-NAME was not observed in other gray matter regions (eg, caudate) and is therefore of questionable significance.
It is possible that the time course for inhibition of NOS activity in brain as a whole is different than that required to inhibit the cerebral vascular response to hypercapnia. Our measurement of brain NOS activity is the total activity from neurons, astrocytes, and endothelium. Therefore, our measurement of brain NOS activity may misrepresent NOS activity from any one source (eg, endothelium) that constitutes total brain NOS activity. If this were the case, it would be possible that, even with >90% inhibition of brain NOS activity, hypercapnia could increase CBF by a mechanism that involved only stimulation of endothelium NOS. This is an unlikely scenario because the timing for measurement of hypercapnic response in our study was similar to timing used in other studies10 12 that demonstrated marked attenuation of the CBF response to hypercapnia after administration of an NOS inhibitor.
Another potential confounding factor in our study was the use of L-NAME as the inhibitor of NOS, since it has been demonstrated to also have antimuscarinic effects at high concentrations.33 This is probably not an important factor, since other more potent muscarinic-receptor antagonists do not alter the cerebral vascular response to hypercapnia.34 Furthermore, Pelligrino et al10 also used L-NAME in their studies and demonstrated substantial attenuation of the CBF response to hypercapnia in rats.
Other laboratories have demonstrated that NO may be an important mediator of vasodilation during moderate levels of hypercapnia but not at extreme levels of hypercapnia.35 Although it is possible that inhibition of NOS may have attenuated the cerebral vascular response to a lesser level of hypercapnia than that achieved in the moderate-CO2 group, this is an unlikely explanation for our data; other investigators have raised PCO2 to a higher level (70 to 80 mm Hg, Pelligrino et al10 ; 68 mm Hg, Wang et al12 ) during hypercapnia and still demonstrated significant attenuation of the hypercapnic CBF response. In addition, Iadecola et al36 demonstrated that NOS inhibition was most effective in inhibiting the CBF hypercapnia response at PCO2 of 60 mm Hg and that there was attenuation of the response at PCO2 from 40 to 80 mm Hg. At PCO2 levels above 80 mm Hg, there was no attenuation of the response. In the moderate-CO2 group, the maximal PCO2 value was only 50 mm Hg. Therefore, we expected to find profound inhibition of hypercapnic reactivity after L-NAME administration if NO was an important mediator of hypercapnic CBF hyperemia in primates.
Isoflurane was used for the anesthesia in this study because it is a clinically relevant anesthetic and its use is associated with hemodynamic stability. In addition, we demonstrated that response to both hypocapnia and hypercapnia is retained with anesthetic concentrations comparable to those used in the present study.37 A possible confounding problem with the use of isoflurane as the basal anesthetic is that it, like the other inhalational anesthetics, appears to increase CBF via a mechanism involving stimulation of NOS.20 38 However, we do not believe that the use of isoflurane in our study accounts for the preserved response to hypercapnia; several other studies that demonstrate attenuation of the cerebral vascular response to hypercapnia after NOS inhibition also used an inhalational anesthetic technique (halothane). Halothane, like isoflurane, increases CBF throughout the brain by a mechanism that can be prevented by administration of L-NAME and that therefore presumably involves stimulation of NOS activity.20
Another potential explanation for the differences in our data and the previous studies in rats, which demonstrate a significant dependence of CO2 blood flow response on NOS,10 11 12 is the possibility that rats may have a greater dependence on NO for control of CBF. Although higher brain levels of NOS would not necessarily prove a higher level of basal function, it would support the hypothesis that rats have a higher basal NOS tone than primates. No study has yet evaluated this possibility.
In conclusion, we found that NO contributed to basal cerebral vascular tone in primates. Hypercapnic CBF response was retained in all areas of isoflurane-anesthetized monkeys after inhibition of NOS, although there is a decrease in hypercapnic CBF response in cerebral cortex compared with the baseline response. Because absolute change in CVR with hypercapnia was not affected by L-NAME, we conclude that NO is not a major contributor to the mechanism of hypercapnia-induced vasodilation in primates.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 20, 1993; revision received November 28, 1994; accepted December 29, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Faraci FM. Role of endothelium-derived
relaxing factor in cerebral circulation: large arteries vs.
microcirculation. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:H1038-H1042.
3. Greenberg RS, Helfaer MA, Kirsch JR, Moore LE, Traystman RJ. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition with NG-mono-methyl-L-arginine reversibly decreases cerebral blood flow in piglets. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:384-392. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Faraci FM. Role of nitric oxide in regulation of basilar
artery tone in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H1216-H1221.
5. Fischer-Nakielski H, Schror K. Nitric oxide is the endothelium-derived relaxing factor in bovine pial arterioles. Stroke. 1990;21(suppl IV):IV-46-IV-48.
6.
Wei EP, Kukreja R, Kontos HA. Effects in cats of inhibition
of nitric oxide synthesis on cerebral vasodilation and
endothelium-derived relaxing factor from acetylcholine.
Stroke. 1992;23:1623-1629.
7.
Faraci FM, Breese KR. Nitric oxide mediates vasodilatation in
response to activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate
receptors in brain. Circ Res. 1993;72:476-480.
8.
Chen F-Y, Lee TJ-F. Role of nitric oxide in neurogenic
vasodilation of porcine cerebral artery. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther. 1993;265:339-345.
9.
Toda N, Okamura T. Mechanism underlying the response to
vasodilator nerve stimulation in isolated dog and monkey cerebral
arteries. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H1511-H1517.
10. Pelligrino DA, Koenig HM, Albrecht RF. Nitric oxide synthesis and regional cerebral blood flow responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13:80-87. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Iadecola C. Does nitric oxide mediate the increases in
cerebral blood flow elicited by hypercapnia? Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1992;89:3913-3916.
12. Wang Q, Paulson OB, Lassen NA. Effect of nitric oxide blockade by NG-nitro-L-arginine on cerebral blood flow response to changes in carbon dioxide tension. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:947-953. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Niwa K, Lindauer U, Villringer A, Dirnagl U. Blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in rats strongly attenuates the CBF response to extracellular acidosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13:535-539. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Kozniewska E, Oseka M, Stys T. Effects of endothelium-derived nitric oxide on cerebral circulation during normoxia and hypoxia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:311-317. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Ichord RN, Helfaer MA, Kirsch JR, Wilson D, Traystman RJ.
Nitric oxide synthase inhibition attenuates hypoglycemic cerebral
hyperemia in piglets. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1062-H1068.
16. Saito S, Wilson DA, Hanley DF, Traystman RJ. Nitric oxide modulates cerebral blood vessel tone and depresses cerebrovascular resistance changes to carbon dioxide in anesthetized dogs. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13(suppl 1):S153. Abstract.
17. Heymann MA, Payne BD, Hoffman JI, Rudolph AM. Blood flow measurements with radionuclide-labeled particles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1977;20:55-79. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Wilson DA, Traystman RJ, Rapela CE. Transient analysis of
the canine cerebrovascular response to carbon dioxide.
Circ Res. 1985;56:596-605.
19. McPherson RW, Kirsch JR, Tobin JR, Ghaly RF, Traystman RJ. Cerebral blood flow in primates is increased by isoflurane over time and is decreased by nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:1320-1327. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
McPherson RW, Kirsch JR, Traystman RJ.
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
prevents cerebral hyperemia by inhaled anesthetics in dogs.
Anesth Analg. 1993;77:891-897.
21.
Nishikawa T, Kirsch JR, Koehler RC, Bredt DS, Snyder SH,
Traystman RJ. Effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibition on cerebral
blood flow and injury volume during focal ischemia in cats.
Stroke. 1993;24:1717-1724.
22.
Kovach AGB, Szabo C, Benyo Z, Csaki C, Greenberg JH, Reivich
M. Effects of
NG-nitro-L-arginine and
L-arginine on regional cerebral blood flow in the cat. J Physiol
(Lond). 1992;449:183-196.
23. Nozaki K, Moskowitz MA, Maynard KI, Koketsu N, Dawson TM, Bredt DS, Snyder SH. Possible origins and distribution of immunoreactive nitric oxide synthase-containing nerve fibers in cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13:70-79. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Bredt DS, Glatt CE, Hwang PM, Fotuhi M, Dawson TM, Snyder SH. Nitric oxide synthase protein and mRNA are discretely localized in neuronal populations of the mammalian CNS together with NADPH diaphorase. Neuron. 1991;7:615-624. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Bredt DS, Hwang PM, Snyder SH. Localization of nitric oxide synthase indicating a neural role for nitric oxide. Nature. 1990;347:768-770. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Murphy S, Minor RL Jr, Welk G, Harrison DG. Evidence for an astrocyte-derived vasorelaxing factor with properties similar to nitric oxide. J Neurochem. 1990;55:349-351. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Moncada S, Radomski MW, Palmer RM. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor: identification as nitric oxide and role in the control of vascular tone and platelet function. Biochem Pharmacol. 1988;37:2495-2501. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Marshall JJ, Kontos HA. Endothelium-derived relaxing factors:
a perspective from in vivo data. Hypertension. 1990;16:371-386.
29. Sandor P, Komjati K, Reivich M, Nyary I. Major role of nitric oxide in the mediation of regional CO2 responsiveness of the cerebral and spinal cord vessels of the cat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994;14:49-58. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Thompson BG, Pluta RM, Girton M, Oldfield EH. Nitric oxide (NO) mediates chemoregulation of CBF in primates. Stroke. 1992;23:154. Abstract.
31.
Iadecola C, Zhang F. Nitric oxide-dependent and -independent
components of cerebrovasodilation elicited by hypercapnia. Am J
Physiol. 1994;266:R546-R552.
32.
Iadecola C, Xu X. Nitro-L-arginine attenuates
hypercapnic cerebrovasodilation without affecting cerebral metabolism.
Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R518-R525.
33.
Buxton ILO, Cheek DJ, Eckman D, Westfall DP, Sanders KM, Keef
KD. NG-Nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester and other alkyl esters of arginine are muscarinic receptor
antagonists. Circ Res. 1993;72:387-395.
34. Busija DW, Heistad DD. Atropine does not attenuate cerebral vasodilatation during hypercapnia. Am J Physiol. 1982;242:H683-H687.
35. Faraci FM, Breese KR, Heistad DD. Cerebral vasodilation during hypercapnia: role of glibenclamide-sensitive potassium channels and nitric oxide. Stroke. 1994;25:1679-1683. [Abstract]
36. Iadecola C, Zhang F, Li J. Nitric oxide-dependent and independent components of cerebrovasodilation elicited by hypercapnia. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1993;19:1267. Abstract.
37. McPherson RW, Derrer SA, Traystman RJ. Changes in cerebral CO2 responsivity over time during isoflurane anesthesia in the dog. J Neurosurg Anesth. 1991;3:12-19.
38. Moore LE, Kirsch JR, Helfaer MA, Tobin JR, McPherson RW, Traystman RJ. Nitric oxide and prostanoids contribute to isoflurane-induced cerebral hyperemia in pigs. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:1328-1337.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. N. Ainslie, C. Murrell, K. Peebles, M. Swart, M. A. Skinner, M. J. A. Williams, and R. D. Taylor Early morning impairment in cerebral autoregulation and cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity in healthy humans: relation to endothelial function Exp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 92(4): 769 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Hoth, D. F. Tate, A. Poppas, D. E. Forman, J. Gunstad, D. J. Moser, R. H. Paul, A. L. Jefferson, A. P. Haley, and R. A. Cohen Endothelial Function and White Matter Hyperintensities in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 308 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Barkoudah, J. H. Jaggar, and C. W. Leffler The permissive role of endothelial NO in CO-induced cerebrovascular dilation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1459 - H1465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H S Markus Cerebral perfusion and stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 75(3): 353 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Toda and T. Okamura The Pharmacology of Nitric Oxide in the Peripheral Nervous System of Blood Vessels Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2003; 55(2): 271 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bhardwaj, A. F. Castro III, N. J. Alkayed, P. D. Hurn, and J. R. Kirsch Anesthetic Choice of Halothane Versus Propofol: Impact on Experimental Perioperative Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1920 - 1925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Najarian, A. M. Marrache, I. Dumont, P. Hardy, M. H. Beauchamp, X. Hou, K. Peri, F. Gobeil Jr, D. R. Varma, and S. Chemtob Prolonged Hypercapnia-Evoked Cerebral Hyperemia via K+ Channel- and Prostaglandin E2-Dependent Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Induction Circ. Res., December 8, 2000; 87(12): 1149 - 1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kiss, S. Dallinger, O. Findl, G. Rainer, H.-G. Eichler, and L. Schmetterer Acetazolamide-induced cerebral and ocular vasodilation in humans is independent of nitric oxide Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 1999; 276(6): R1661 - R1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. White, C. Deane, P. Vallance, and H. S. Markus Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition in Humans Reduces Cerebral Blood Flow but Not the Hyperemic Response to Hypercapnia Stroke, February 1, 1998; 29(2): 467 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yang, C. Iadecola, and F. M. Faraci Activation of Cerebellar Climbing Fibers Increases Cerebellar Blood Flow : Role of Glutamate Receptors, Nitric Oxide, and cGMP • Editorial Comment: Role of Glutamate Receptors, Nitric Oxide, and cGMP Stroke, February 1, 1998; 29(2): 499 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. FARACI and D. D. HEISTAD Regulation of the Cerebral Circulation: Role of Endothelium and Potassium Channels Physiol Rev, January 1, 1998; 78(1): 53 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Schmetterer, O. Findl, K. Strenn, U. Graselli, J. Kastner, H.-G. Eichler, and M. Wolzt Role of NO in the O2 and CO2 responsiveness of cerebral and ocular circulation in humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): R2005 - R2012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kinoshita, Z. S. Katusic, and E. P. Wei Role of Potassium Channels in Relaxations of Isolated Canine Basilar Arteries to Acidosis Stroke, February 1, 1997; 28(2): 433 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |