This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Czosnyka, M. Articles by Pickard, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Czosnyka, M. Articles by Pickard, J. D.

(Stroke. 1996;27:1829-1834.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Monitoring of Cerebral Autoregulation in Head-Injured Patients

Marek Czosnyka, PhD; Piotr Smielewski, MSc; Peter Kirkpatrick, FRCS(NS); David K. Menon, MD, PhD John D. Pickard, MChir, FRCS

the Medical Research Council Cambridge Center for Brain Repair and Academic Neurosurgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital (M.C., P.S., P.K., J.D.P.), and University Department of Anesthesiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital (D.M.), Cambridge, UK.

Correspondence to Dr Marek Czosnyka, Neurosurgical Unit, PO Box 167, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. E-mail MC141@MEDSCHL.CAM.AC.UK.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background and Purpose Disturbed cerebral autoregulation has been reported to correlate with an unfavorable outcome after head injury. Using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, we investigated whether hemodynamic responses to spontaneous variations of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) provide reliable information on cerebral autoregulatory reserve.

Methods We studied 82 patients with head injury daily. Waveforms of intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial pressure, and transcranial Doppler flow velocity (FV) were captured during 2-hour periods. Time-averaged mean FV (FVm) and the FV during cardiac systole (FVs) were resolved. The correlation coefficient indices between FVm and CPP (Mx) and between FVs and CPP (Sx) during spontaneous fluctuations of CPP were calculated during 3-minute epochs and averaged for each investigation.

Results Mx and Sx correlated with CPP (r=-.34, P=<.002; r=-.2, P=NS, respectively), with ICP (r=.46, P<.0001; r=.34, P<.003, respectively), with admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (r=-.34, P<.0025; r=-.38, P<.0008, respectively), and with outcome after head injury (r=.41, P<.0002; r=.48, P<.00009, respectively). In patients who died, cerebral autoregulation was severely disturbed during the first 2 days after injury.

Conclusions Indices derived from spontaneous fluctuations of FV waveform and CPP describe cerebral vascular pressure reactivity. They correlate with outcome after head injury and therefore may be used to guide autoregulation-oriented intensive therapy.

Key Words: autoregulation • blood flow velocity • head injury • ultrasonics

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow is important in preventing secondary insults to the injured brain.¹ Disturbed autoregulation may result in an abnormal balance between cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and the metabolic requirement of the cerebral tissues. Transient episodes of cerebral ischemia, hyperemia,² and/or uncontrollable increases in cerebral blood volume³ are thought to be detrimental.

Although abnormal cerebral autoregulation is seen after head injury, the underlying mechanisms effecting this disturbance are not fully understood.^{4 5} Endothelial dysfunction,⁶ vasospasm,⁷ and release of free radicals⁸ may be involved. Accordingly, little is known regarding how to restore autoregulation. Some pursue an "autoregulation-oriented" therapy that attempts to maintain an adequate CPP⁹ by pressure support and mild hypocapnia.¹⁰ Some centers have suggested that disordered cerebral autoregulation correlates with a poor outcome.^{11 12} Since the autoregulatory reserve may vary with time, reliable and repeatable clinical tests of autoregulation are essential to guide therapy.

Various methods of assessing the cerebrovascular hemodynamic reserve are available. These include tests of carbon dioxide reactivity,⁴ stress tests relying on mechanical¹³ or pharmacological¹⁴ alteration of arterial pressure, and the transient hyperemic response test after carotid artery compression.¹⁵ All may use TCD to assess the dynamic response of cerebral FV in the basal arteries to various stimuli. The averaged FV values encompass a complex array of factors, making interpretation of abnormalities difficult.¹⁶ However, the value of TCD in head-injured patients has been facilitated by methods of continuous analysis of FV waveform. Observation of the respiratory-related fluctuations in arterial pressure and FV to assess cerebral autoregulation has been recently reported.¹⁷ The FV pulse waveform is of particular importance, and in head-injured patients FV pulsatility correlates with the cerebral arteriovenous oxygen difference as CPP falls, which has clinical significance.¹⁸

In the present study we examined the possibility that continuous assessment of autoregulatory reserve can be achieved by comparing changes in FVm and FVs with spontaneous changes in CPP. We verified the hypothesis that a generous autoregulatory margin should be associated with a better outcome, and we attempted to study changes in autoregulatory reserve in time after head injury.

	Subjects and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patients
Eighty-two patients (27 females, 55 males; age range, 6 to 75 years; mean age, 36 years) were admitted to Addenbrooke's Hospital suffering from head injuries with a mean GCS score of 6 (range, 3 to 13). Forty-five percent of the patients had hematomas seen on first (68%) or subsequent (32%) scans (45% extradural, 30% subdural, 25% intracerebral), of which 77% were evacuated surgically. No patients in whom bone flaps were removed were included in this study. The patients were paralyzed, sedated, and ventilated to achieve mild hypocapnia. Falls in ABP that reduced CPP to <60 mm Hg were managed with alternating colloid and normal saline infusions, with supplementary inotropic agents if necessary (constant infusion of dopamine 2 to 15 µg/kg per minute). If ICP rose to >25 mm Hg, boluses of mannitol (200 mL of 20% for 20 minutes) were administered.

Monitoring
We monitored ICP continuously using a fiber-optic transducer (Camino Direct Pressure Monitor, Camino Laboratories) inserted intraparenchymally into the frontal region. Arterial pressure was monitored directly in the radial or dorsalis pedis artery (System 8000, S&W Vickers Ltd). The MCA was insonated daily for 20 minutes to 2 hours, starting from the day of admission until discharge or day 8 after head injury, with the PCDop 842 Doppler Ultrasound Unit (Scimed). Signals were monitored during periods of stable respiratory parameters, free from physiotherapy, tracheal suction, and other disturbances.

Data Capture
Analog outputs from the pressure monitors and the TCD unit (maximal frequency envelope) were connected to the analog-to-digital convertor (DT 2814, Data Translation) fitted into an IBM AT laptop computer (Amstrad ALT 386 SX). Data were sampled, digitized, and stored on the hard disk with the software for the waveform recording (WREC, W. Zabolotny, Warsaw University of Technology). Digital signals were then processed with software developed in-house (ICMR, M.C.).

Time-averaged values of ICP, ABP, and CPP (CPP=ICP-ABP) were calculated with the use of waveform time integration for 5-second intervals. FVm, FVs, and FVd were calculated after careful spectral filtration to reduce the influence of noise and averaged within the same 5-second periods.

Pearson's correlation coefficients¹⁹ between 36 consecutive samples of averaged CPP and FVm, FVs, and FVd were calculated for every 3-minute period. The correlation coefficients between CPP and FVd or FVm were not significantly different from one another with the exception of cases in which CPP was very low and no diastolic flow was recorded. Obviously, in such cases correlation of CPP with zero FVd values made little sense. Therefore, only the coefficients derived for FVm and FVs were included for final data analysis. Calculated correlation coefficients for FVm and FVs versus CPP, termed Mx and Sx, respectively, were then averaged over each recording.

Statistical Methods
The indices Mx and Sx and values of CPP, ICP, ABP, FV, and PI were averaged over all examinations made in different patients. Nonparametric statistical methods were generally used since the majority of variables did not have significantly normal distributions. The rank correlation coefficients were calculated between grade of initial coma (GCS score at admission), outcome (classified as favorable [good or moderate disability] or unfavorable [severe disability, persistent vegetative state, or dead] assessed 6 months after injury), patients' age, and the studied parameters. ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) was used to present differences in selected indices in separate outcome groups and according to days after injury. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for significance in difference from zero of Mx and Sx in consecutive days after head injury.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Observation of Spontaneous Fluctuations of FV, ICP, and ABP
Recordings demonstrated typical patterns of spontaneous fluctuations of FV waveform during ICP plateau waves, intracranial hypertension, and incidental arterial hypotension.

During plateau waves of ICP (n=7 recordings), FVs remained constant, while FVd decreased (Fig 1). In contrast, during refractory intracranial hypertension (n=3 recordings) the rise of ICP produced a decrease in both FVs and FVd (Fig 1, bottom panel).

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Recordings of ABP, ICP, and FV waveforms in two patients after severe head injury. Top, Divergent reaction of FVs (stable) and FVd (falling) to raised ICP during plateau wave. Bottom, Parallel fall in FVs and FVd during refractory rise in ICP.

Incidents of arterial hypotension (Fig 2) were more frequent. During moderate decreases in ABP (mean CPP >70 mm Hg; n=15 recordings), FVs was stable, while FVd decreased. During more severe hypotension (mean CPP <60 mm Hg; n=8), both FVs and FVd decreased.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Recordings of ABP, ICP, and FV waveforms in two patients after severe head injury. Top, Convergent decrease in both FVs and FVd to deep spontaneous arterial hypotension. Bottom, Divergent reaction of FVs (stable) and FVd (falling) to moderate variations in ABP.

These observations suggest that FVs remains constant while FVd decreases during moderate falls in CPP, whereas both FVs and FVd decrease when CPP falls below 60 mm Hg.

Regression of FVs and FVd Versus CPP
Regression lines describing the baseline correlation between CPP and FV waveforms (FVs, FVm, and FVd) revealed three distinctive patterns (Fig 3), as follows. In group 1, all regression lines (for FVs, FVm, and FVd) had negative gradients (Sx <0, Mx <0; n=195 recordings in 49 patients). In group 2, the regression lines for FVs had a negative gradient, but those for FVm and FVd had positive gradients (Sx <0, Mx >0; n=95 recordings in 20 patients). In group 3, all regression lines had positive gradients (Sx >0, Mx >0; n=57 recordings in 13 patients).

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Three distinctive patterns of linear regression between slow waves of CPP, FVm, FVs, and FVd. Left panel shows negative correlation between Fvs, FVm, FVd, and CPP (Sx=-0.42, Mx=-0.21). Middle panel shows negative correlation between FVs and CPP (Sx=-0.24) but positive correlation between FVm, FVd, and CPP (Mx=0.28). Right panel shows positive association between FVs, FVm, FVd, and CPP (Sx=0.38, Mx=0.64).

Averaged values of GCS score on admission, outcome, and CPP in these three groups are presented in Table 1. In group 3, in which FVs and FVm were pressure-passive (Sx and Mx positive), both outcome and severity of injury were significantly (P<.05) worse than for groups 1 and 2.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Median (for Outcome and GCS) and Average (for CPP) Values of Selected Parameters Calculated in Three Groups of Patients Classified According to Averaged Correlation Coefficients Between Sx, Mx, and CPP

Correlation of Mx and Sx With Severity of Injury, Outcome, Age, CPP, and ICP
Spearman's correlation coefficients of Sx and Mx, averaged over multiple investigations in each patient, with CPP were calculated versus severity of injury (GCS score on admission), outcome, age, mean CPP, and ICP. The detailed results are presented in Table 2 (correlation with clinical outcome and admission GCS score) and Table 3 (correlation with mean CPP, ABP, and ICP). Mx and Sx were significantly correlated with outcome and GCS score on admission.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Spearman's Correlation Coefficients Between Glasgow Outcome Score, GCS Score on Admission, Patient's Age, and Averages of Calculated Parameters

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. Spearman's Correlation Coefficients Between PI, Sx, and Mx Indices and Mean CPP, ABP, and ICP in 82 Head-Injured Patients

Averaged values and 95% confidence limits (ANOVA) of Sx, Mx, and PI in patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes are graphically presented in Fig 4. A greater F value indicates better differentiation of the y variable among different outcome groups. The highest F values are for Sx and Mx. For comparison, F values (ANOVA) of GCS score and PI versus outcome were lower.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. ANOVA of Mx and Sx in two groups of patients with different outcomes (good/moderate=favorable; severely disabled, persistent vegetative state, or dead=unfavorable). For comparison, PI and GCS score were also analyzed.

Time Profile of Disturbed Autoregulation After Head Injury
The time profile of the calculated indices shows a significant pattern of different autoregulatory status that fluctuates with time (P<.002, ANOVA) (Fig 5). The differences between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes were compared. On the first 2 days after injury, a positive Mx (P<.05) was seen in patients with unfavorable outcome. Autoregulation was also abnormal for FVs, resulting in an Sx that did not differ significantly from zero (P>.05). On average, both outcome groups had intact autoregulation during days 3 to 5 after injury (Mx <0, Sx <0; P<.05). Thereafter, patients with an unfavorable outcome showed a significant loss of autoregulation during days 6 to 8 (Mx >0; P<.05).

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. ANOVA of Mx versus days after head injury in groups with favorable and unfavorable outcomes. **Mx significantly positive (**P<.05, *P<.06). Autoregulation was disturbed for the first 2 days and after day 6 but only in patients with fatal outcomes.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Sx and Mx as Indices of Autoregulation
Do the indices Sx and Mx reflect cerebral autoregulation because they correlate with falling CPP? Mx becomes statistically positive for CPP <55 mm Hg, and Sx becomes statistically different from zero (nonnegative; P>.05) for CPP <40 mm Hg. Moreover, Sx and Mx correlate significantly with outcome and GCS score on admission. A poor outcome and low GCS score are associated with indices that indicate absent autoregulation. This finding supports the importance of autoregulation-oriented therapy. Although "optimal CPP"⁹ is necessary to maintain a safe autoregulation margin and sufficient perfusion, in some cases (n=6) autoregulation was disturbed even when CPP was >70 mm Hg and outcome was unfavorable. This may encourage the clinical use of Sx and Mx to continuously monitor the pressure reactivity reserve, even if CPP appears to be within a safe range.

Time Profile of Indices of Autoregulation
Time-dependent changes in autoregulation indices demonstrated that the first 2 days are critical from the point of view of maintenance of good autoregulatory reserve. Patients with unfavorable outcome had clearly disturbed autoregulation within this period, while patients with good/moderate outcome did not display disturbances in autoregulatory reserve. Therefore, if autoregulation-oriented management is to be accepted, disturbed autoregulation should be managed very intensively soon after admission. Continuous assessment of autoregulation should be used as part of a real-time multimodality monitoring system²⁰ if acute changes in autoregulatory status are to be realized.

Comparison With Experimental Studies
According to experimental studies in which methods to artificially raise ICP or decrease CPP by arterial hemorrhage²¹ were used, when CPP falls, FVs is initially stable, while FVm decreases. When the lower threshold for cerebral autoregulation is reached, as indicated by cortical blood flow measurement, FVs and FVm both fall.²² These experimental results encouraged the separate estimation of the correlation coefficient between CPP and FVs and FVm and their interpretation as indices of autoregulation. From these observations we suggest that when FVs is stable and FVm decreases with decreasing CPP, Sx should be approximately zero, while Mx becomes positive. Below the threshold for exhausted autoregulation, FVs and FVm become pressure passive, and both Mx and Sx become positive.

The negative values of Mx and Sx observed clinically cannot be explained from the aforementioned experiments. One possibility is that with a reactive cerebrovascular bed, vascular resistance overreacts to slow waves in CPP, producing a negative correlation between CPP, FVs, and FVm.

Importance of Analysis of CPP
Various methods of testing cerebral autoregulation have been described.^{11 12 13 15 17} Most are based on analysis of the response in TCD variables when ABP is altered during the test. In head injury, when the cerebral compensatory reserve is severely compromised,²³ any variation of ABP may provoke an acute response in ICP.^{2 24} When autoregulation is intact, changes in CPP may be greater than the change in ABP, since ABP and ICP are changing in opposite directions. When autoregulation is impaired, an increase or decrease in ABP provokes change in ICP in the same direction, with CPP remaining constant. This phenomenon, termed false autoregulation,⁴ may contaminate the results when arterial pressure either increases or decreases during the test. We emphasize the importance of analysis of CPP instead of ABP alone in testing cerebral autoregulation in head injury. Equivalent indices calculated with only ABP correlated with outcome and severity of injury less significantly (r=.23; P<.05) in our study.

Conclusions
The autoregulation indices Mx and Sx, calculated continuously with the use of TCD and CPP waveforms and presented as time trends on the computer screen, indicate the state of cerebral pressure reactivity. Positive values of Mx and Sx signify severely disturbed reactivity, which is predictive of a poor outcome. Cerebral autoregulation is significantly disturbed during the first 2 days after head injury in patients with unfavorable outcome.

	Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms

 

ABP = central mean arterial blood pressure CPP = cerebral perfusion pressure FV = blood flow velocity in the MCA FVm, FVs, FVd = time-averaged mean FV, systolic FV, diastolic FV GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale ICP = intracranial pressure MCA = middle cerebral artery Mx = mean index; correlation coefficient between FVm and CPP (during 3 minutes) PI = pulsatility index (FV pulse peak to peak divided by FVm) Sx = systolic index; correlation coefficient between FVs and CPP (during 3 minutes) TCD = transcranial Doppler ultrasonography

	Acknowledgments

 
This study was supported by Overseas Research Studentship, Cambridge, UK, and the Sacler Foundation (P.S.). Dr Czosnyka is on unpaid leave from the Warsaw University of Technology (Poland).

Received March 4, 1996; revision received May 23, 1996; accepted June 14, 1996.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Miller JD, Becker DP. Secondary insults to the injured brain. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1982;27:292-298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Muizelaar JP, Ward JD, Marmarou A, Newlon PG, Wachi A. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in severely head injured children, part 2: autoregulation. J Neurosurg. 1989;71:72-76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kirkpatrick PJ, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Near-infrared spectroscopy use in patients with head injury. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:963-970.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Enevoldsen EM, Jensen FT. Autoregulation and CO₂ responses of cerebral blood flow in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1978;48:689-703.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Piper IR, Weir D, Miller JD. Early hypoperfusion and impaired pressure autoregulation and CO₂ reactivity following severe injury in a rodent model of impact acceleration neurotrauma. J Neurotrama. 1995;12:412. Abstract.
6. McCulloh J, Edvinsson L. Cerebrovascular smooth muscle reactivity: a critical appraisal of in vitro and in situ techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1984;4:129-139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Compton JS, Teddy PJ. Cerebral arterial vasospasm following severe head injury: a transcranial Doppler study. Br J Neurosurg. 1987;1:435-439.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kontos HA. Superoxide production in experimental brain injury. J Neurosurg. 1986;64:803-807.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Rosner MJ, Rosner SD, Johnson AH. Cerebral perfusion pressure: management protocol and clinical results. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:949-962.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Paulson O, Olesen J, Christensen MS. Restoration of autoregulation of cerebral blood flow by hypocapnia. Neurology. 1972;22:286-293.[Free Full Text]
11. Newell DW, Aaslid R, Stooss R, Reulen HJ. Evaluation of closed head injury patients using transcranial Doppler monitoring. In: Avezaat CJJ, van Eijndhoven JHM, Maas AIR, Tans JTJ, eds. Intracranial Pressure VIII. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1993:309-312.
12. Steiger HJ, Aaslid R, Stooss R, Seiler RW. Transcranial Doppler monitoring in head injury: relations between type of injury, flow velocities, vasoreactivity and outcome. Neurosurgery. 1994;34:79-86.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Aaslid R, Lindegaard KF, Sorteberg W, Nornes H. Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans. Stroke. 1989;20:45-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Strebel S, Lam A, Matta B, Mayberg TS, Aaslid R, Newell DW. Dynamic and static autoregulation during isoflurane, desoflurane and propofol anaesthesia. Anaesthesiology. 1995;83:66-76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Giller CA. A bedside test for cerebral autoregulation using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;108:7-14.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kontos HA. Validity of cerebral arterial blood calculations from velocity measurements. Stroke. 1989;20:1-3.[Free Full Text]
17. Diehl RR, Linden D, Lucke D, Berlit P. Phase relationship between cerebral blood flow velocity and blood pressure: a clinical test of autoregulation. Stroke. 1995;26:1801-1804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Chan KH, Miller DJ, Dearden M, Andrews PJD, Midgley S. The effect of changes in cerebral perfusion pressure upon middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation after severe brain trauma. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:55-61.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Belmont, Calif. Wadsworth Publishing Co; 1987:80-95.
20. Kirkpatrick PJ, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Multimodal monitoring in neurointensive care. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;60:131-139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Nelson RJ, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD, Maksymowicz W, Perry S, Martin JL, Lovick AHJ. Experimental aspects of cerebrospinal hemodynamics: the relationship between blood flow velocity waveform and cerebral autoregulation. Neurosurgery. 1992;31:705-710.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Czosnyka M, Richards H, Kirkpatrick P, Pickard J. Assessment of cerebral autoregulation using ultrasound and laser Doppler waveforms: an experimental study in anaesthetised rabbits. Neurosurgery.. 1994;35:287-289.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Miller JD, Pickard JD. Intracranial volume/pressure studies in patients with head injury. Injury. 1974;5:265-268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Lang EW, Chesnut RM. Intracranial pressure: monitoring and management. Neurosurg Intensive Care. 1994;5:573-605.
25. Miller JD, Stanek AE, Langfitt TW. Cerebral blood flow regulation during experimental brain compression. J Neurosurg. 1973;39:186-196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Brady, J. K. Lee, K. K. Kibler, R. B. Easley, R. C. Koehler, and D. H. Shaffner Continuous Measurement of Autoregulation by Spontaneous Fluctuations in Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Comparison of 3 Methods Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2531 - 2537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Haubrich, Z. Czosnyka, A. Lavinio, P. Smielewski, R. R. Diehl, J. D. Pickard, and M. Czosnyka Is There a Direct Link Between Cerebrovascular Activity and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure-Volume Compensation? Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): 2677 - 2680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Brady, J. K. Lee, K. K. Kibler, P. Smielewski, M. Czosnyka, R. B. Easley, R. C. Koehler, and D. H. Shaffner Continuous Time-Domain Analysis of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): 2818 - 2825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B T Ang, J Wong, K K Lee, E Wang, and I Ng Temporal changes in cerebral tissue oxygenation with cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in severe traumatic brain injury J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 78(3): 298 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lavinio, E. A. Schmidt, C. Haubrich, P. Smielewski, J. D. Pickard, and M. Czosnyka Noninvasive Evaluation of Dynamic Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Using Finapres Plethysmograph and Transcranial Doppler Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 402 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Dohmen, B. Bosche, R. Graf, T. Reithmeier, R.-I. Ernestus, G. Brinker, J. Sobesky, and W.-D. Heiss Identification and Clinical Impact of Impaired Cerebrovascular Autoregulation in Patients With Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction Stroke, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 56 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Steiner and P. J. D. Andrews Monitoring the injured brain: ICP and CBF Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2006; 97(1): 26 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Latka, M. Turalska, M. Glaubic-Latka, W. Kolodziej, D. Latka, and B. J. West Phase dynamics in cerebral autoregulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H2272 - H2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Reinhard, M. Roth, B. Guschlbauer, A. Harloff, J. Timmer, M. Czosnyka, and A. Hetzel Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Assessed From Spontaneous Blood Pressure Fluctuations Stroke, August 1, 2005; 36(8): 1684 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Reinhard, M. Roth, T. Muller, B. Guschlbauer, J. Timmer, M. Czosnyka, and A. Hetzel Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting on Impairment of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1381 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Soehle, M. Czosnyka, J. D. Pickard, and P. J. Kirkpatrick Continuous Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1133 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Neri, C. Sassi, L. Barabesi, M. Massetti, G. Pula, D. Buklas, R. Tassi, and P. Giomarelli Cerebral autoregulation after hypothermic circulatory arrest in operations on the aortic arch Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 72 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Steiner, J. P. Coles, A. J. Johnston, D. A. Chatfield, P. Smielewski, T. D. Fryer, F. I. Aigbirhio, J. C. Clark, J. D. Pickard, D. K. Menon, et al. Assessment of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation in Head-Injured Patients: A Validation Study Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2404 - 2409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Reinhard, M. Roth, T. Muller, M. Czosnyka, J. Timmer, and A. Hetzel Cerebral Autoregulation in Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease Assessed From Spontaneous Blood Pressure Fluctuations by the Correlation Coefficient Index Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2138 - 2144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E W Lang, J Lagopoulos, J Griffith, K Yip, A Yam, Y Mudaliar, H M Mehdorn, and N W C Dorsch Cerebral vasomotor reactivity testing in head injury: the link between pressure and flow J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2003; 74(8): 1053 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Steiner, A. J. Johnston, D. A. Chatfield, M. Czosnyka, M. R. Coleman, J. P. Coles, A. K. Gupta, J. D. Pickard, and D. K. Menon The Effects of Large-Dose Propofol on Cerebrovascular Pressure Autoregulation in Head-Injured Patients Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2003; 97(2): 572 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L A Steiner, J P Coles, M Czosnyka, P S Minhas, T D Fryer, F I Aigbirhio, J C Clark, P Smielewski, D A Chatfield, T Donovan, et al. Cerebrovascular pressure reactivity is related to global cerebral oxygen metabolism after head injury J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2003; 74(6): 765 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Johnston, L. A. Steiner, A. K. Gupta, and D. K. Menon Cerebral oxygen vasoreactivity and cerebral tissue oxygen reactivity{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2003; 90(6): 774 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Mitrouska, E. Kondili, G. Prinianakis, N. Siafakas, and D. Georgopoulos Effects of Theophylline on Ventilatory Poststimulus Potentiation in Patients with Brain Damage Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2003; 167(8): 1124 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Schmidt, M. Czosnyka, A. Raabe, H. Yahya, J. J. Schwarze, D. Sackerer, D. Sander, and J. Klingelhofer Adaptive Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Autoregulation Stroke, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 84 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E W Lang, H M Mehdorn, N W C Dorsch, and M Czosnyka Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: a validation study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2002; 72(5): 583 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. K. Tibble, K. J. Girling, and R. P. Mahajan A Comparison of the Transient Hyperemic Response Test and the Static Autoregulation Test to Assess Graded Impairment in Cerebral Autoregulation During Propofol, Desflurane, and Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2001; 93(1): 171 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Kirkness, P. H. Mitchell, R. L. Burr, and D. W. Newell Cerebral Autoregulation and Outcome in Acute Brain Injury Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2001; 2(3): 175 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Carey, P. J. Eames, M. J. Blake, R. B. Panerai, and J. F. Potter Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Is Unaffected by Aging Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 2895 - 2900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Giller, A. M. Giller, C. R. Cooper, and M. R. Hatab Evaluation of the cerebral hemodynamic response to rhythmic handgrip J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2000; 88(6): 2205 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Schmidt, J. Klingelhofer, J. MD, J. J. Schwarze, D. Sander, and I. Wittich Noninvasive Prediction of Intracranial Pressure Curves Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography and Blood Pressure Curves Stroke, December 1, 1997; 28(12): 2465 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. Smielewski, M. Czosnyka, P. Kirkpatrick, H. McEroy, H. Rutkowska, and J. D. Pickard Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Carotid Artery Compression Stroke, December 1, 1996; 27(12): 2197 - 2203. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar