| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1996;27:296-299.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Neurology, University Hospital of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Correspondence to Martin Müller, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of the Saarland, Oscar-Orth-str 3, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods With the use of blood flow direction, compression tests, and evident side-to-side asymmetries of blood velocities, the collateral supply through the anterior and posterior communicating arteries, the ophthalmic artery, and leptomeningeal anastomoses was evaluated by transcranial Doppler ultrasound in 48 patients (42 men, 6 women; mean±SD age, 59±9 years) with occlusion (n=36) or stenosis of more than 90% (n=12) of one internal carotid artery. Ipsilateral vasomotor reactivity was determined by the percent increase of middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity with the use of (1) the breath-holding maneuver and (2) acetazolamide (1 g IV) as vasodilatory stimulus. Additional stenoses (50% to <90%) of the contralateral internal carotid artery were present in 20 of the 48 patients.
Results Vasomotor reactivity was not affected by the presence of a contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis. Both vasodilatory stimuli similarly indicated poor vasomotor reactivity when an ophthalmic or a leptomeningeal pathway accompanied an anterior communicating artery pathway compared with a lone anterior communicating artery pathway (P<.05). The acetazolamide challenge indicated significantly better preserved vasomotor reactivity when blood supply was provided through a lone anterior communicating artery pathway (66±30%) than through an anterior and posterior communicating artery pathway (33±20%, P<.05), whereas the breath-holding method failed to show such a difference.
Conclusions The presence of an ophthalmic artery pathway may provide the first evidence of disturbed vasomotor reactivity. The use of cerebral angiography to evaluate collateral pathways must be considered carefully since transcranial Doppler ultrasound is a reliable noninvasive alternative.
Key Words: autoregulation carotid artery diseases cerebral blood flow ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cerebral angiography, which was predominantly used in the cited studies to determine the collateral pathways, is risky in patients with cerebrovascular diseases.16 17 18 19 TCD has been proven to accurately determine intracranial collateral pathways compared with cerebral angiography,20 and its measurement of blood velocity changes stimulated by acetazolamide or carbon dioxide correlates well with rCBF changes, indicating that VMR evaluated by blood velocity changes adequately reflects cerebral autoregulatory response.21 22 23 24 In one recent TCD study,4 the carbon dioxideinduced VMR was preserved when the collateral pathway evaluated exclusively by TCD was of the willisian type and was disturbed when blood supply was provided through a lone ophthalmic pathway. Because this study may have consequences for the diagnostic management of patients with severe occlusive carotid artery disease, eg, the angiographic evaluation of the collateral pathways, further confirmation is needed.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients received a continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound examination (SPEAD 6, Spead Electronique; 4-MHz probe) to classify the findings of the contralateral ICA with use of published criteria.25 Briefly, a stenosis of 50% to 70% was diagnosed when a blood velocity increase at the ICA origin was accompanied by a turbulent murmur strongly limited to the poststenotic ICA. A stenosis of more than 70% to less than 90% was indicated by a severe blood velocity increase at the ICA origin and a continuing turbulent murmur to the distal submandibular ICA; the blood flow direction in the supraorbital artery remained orthograde. A stenosis of 90% or more was diagnosed when in addition the blood flow in the submandibular ICA was severely reduced or the blood flow direction in the supraorbital artery was reversed. The vertebral arteries were also insonated by continuous-wave Doppler at the atlantal slope and at their origins, but the vertebral artery findings were not taken into consideration for this study. All patients had received a cranial CT before cerebral angiography.
TCD Examination
The TCD examinations (TC 2-64, EME; 2-MHz
pulsed hand-held
probe) were performed while the patients were in a supine position and
included the bilateral transtemporal insonation of the MCA
(at a depth of 50 to 55 mm), the ACA (at a depth of 60 to 70 mm), and
the P1- and the P2-segment of the PCA (at a
depth of 55 to 65 mm). The basilar artery was insonated at a depth of
85 mm or more through the transnuchal approach while the patients
remained in the lying supine position with the head turned slightly
away from the ICA in cases of occlusion or stenosis of 90% or
more; additionally, the head was positioned slightly forward with the
help of a small pillow. The site of compression of the contralateral
common carotid artery was allocated as proximal as possible. For the
measurement of blood velocity, the most powerful signal at the highest
mean blood velocity level that was recorded constantly during a
10-second period was used. For technical details and for a discussion
of the accuracy of TCD in identifying intracranial collateral pathways,
see previous reports.20 26 Briefly, the following
criteria
were used to classify the pathways: a patent ACoA was indicated by a
reversed blood flow in the A1 segment of the ACA
ipsilateral to the relevant MCA or by a prompt fall of blood velocity
in the relevant MCA after compression of the nonoccluded contralateral
common carotid artery. A patent PCoA was indicated by a marked increase
of blood velocity in the basilar artery or in the P1
segment of the PCA ipsilateral to the relevant ICA after compression of
the nonoccluded contralateral common carotid artery.
The mean blood velocity reference values for our laboratory are 40±6 cm/s (range, 24 to 50 cm/s) for the PCA and 46±10 cm/s (range, 20 to 72 cm/s) for the ACA.20 An LM was indicated by evident side-to-side asymmetry of mean blood velocity in the proximal ACA in the condition of an orthograde blood flow direction in both ACAs or in the P2 segment of the PCA, with a high blood velocity exceeding the upper limit of the normal blood velocity range ipsilateral to the relevant ICA. For example, when the mean blood velocity in the P2 segment of the PCA ipsilateral to the relevant MCA was 60 cm/s and in the contralateral P2 segment 43 cm/s, we classified such a finding in the ipsilateral P2 segment of the PCA as LM. By the ophthalmic approach, the OA was insonated at a depth of 45 to 50 mm to determine blood flow direction.
The collateral blood supply for each MCA investigated was classified as follows: lone ACoA (n=8), ACoA/OA (n=10), ACoA/PCoA (n=14), ACoA/PCoA/OA (n=5), PCoA/OA (n=5), and LM (n=6). All patients of the LM group exhibited collateral supply through both the circle of Willis and the OA.
Assessment of VMR
VMR was assessed only ipsilateral to the
ICA with occlusion or
stenosis of more than 90%. The VMR on the contralateral side
was not evaluated. The assessment of VMR was performed with the use of
two different vasodilatory stimuli: (1) carbon dioxide by means of
breath-holding and (2) acetazolamide, which is a potent
vasodilator of cerebral resistance vessels, leading to a smooth
increase of blood velocity with plateauing of blood velocity after 10
to 15 minutes.27 28
The breath-holding test was performed according to the procedure of Markus and Harrison.29 After normal breathing of room air for approximately 4 minutes, the patients were instructed to hold their breath after a normal inspiration. During the maneuver, the MCA mean blood velocity was recorded continuously. The mean blood velocity at the TCD display immediately after the end of the breath-holding period was recorded as the maximal increase of the MCA mean blood velocity (during breath-holding). The time of breath-holding was also recorded. This procedure was repeated after a rest of 2 to 3 minutes to allow mean blood velocities to return to their initial values. For the maximal MCA mean blood velocity increase and for the time of breath-holding, the mean values of both trials were used. BHI was calculated as percent increase in MCA mean blood velocity recorded during breath-holding divided by the seconds of breath-holding, or (Vbh-Vr/Vr) · 100 · s-1, where Vbh is MCA mean blood velocity at the end of the breath-holding, Vr the MCA mean blood velocity at rest, and s-1 per second of breath-holding.
The acetazolamide test was performed after a break of 5 minutes. After the resting value was recorded, acetazolamide stimulation was induced by administration of 1 g acetazolamide IV over 5 minutes. Fifteen minutes after the application of acetazolamide, the mean blood velocities were measured again with the ultrasound sample volume in the same depth of the MCA compared with the resting examination, again measuring the highest mean blood velocity that could have been recorded constantly over a period of 10 seconds. The %VMRacet was calculated as percent change in MCA mean blood velocity after stimulus application compared with mean blood velocity at rest, or (Vacet-Vr/Vr) · 100, where Vacet is the maximal increase of the MCA mean blood velocity after acetazolamide application and Vr the mean blood velocity at rest.
Statistical Analysis
All values are given as mean±SD.
The analysis was
performed with the SPSS/PC+ statistical
package. With the use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for comparison
with a normal distribution, the values of %VMRacet and BHI did not
differ from a normal distribution. The ability of %VMRacet and BHI to
differentiate between the groups of collateral supply was
analyzed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons
(Duncan's test; a value of P=.05 was considered
significant). The ANOVA procedure was used to analyze whether
VMR was affected by the presence of a contralateral ICA
stenosis and by the clinical symptoms.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty-two patients were asymptomatic, and 26 suffered from symptoms ipsilateral to the relevant ICA within 3 months before the actual investigation (minor stroke in 13, major stroke in 6, transient ischemic attack in 3, a branch retinal artery occlusion in 2, prolonged reversible ischemic neurological deficit in 1, and amaurosis fugax attack in 1). The findings of the contralateral ICA (with stenosis: %VMRacet, 24±20%; BHI, 0.53±0.38%/s; without stenosis: %VMRacet, 35±24%; BHI, 0.70±0.36%/s) as well as the clinical presentation (symptomatic: %VMRacet, 28±22%; BHI, 0.57±0.37%/s; asymptomatic: %VMRacet, 34±24%; BHI, 0.70±0.37%/s) did not affect the %VMRacet or the BHI significantly.
The %VMRacet differentiated significantly between the different groups
of collateral pathways (Table
). The %VMRacet was best
preserved in patients with a lone ACoA collateral pathway. Compared
with this pathway, all other types of collateral supply showed a
significantly reduced %VMRacet (Table
). %VMRacet was
significantly
lower in the ACoA/PCoA/OA group compared with the ACoA/PCoA group. It
was also significantly different when the ACoA/PCoA and the PCoA/OA
types of collateralization were compared with the LM group, in which
%VMRacet was poorest.
|
The BHI was not significantly different between the collateral pathway
groups of lone ACoA, ACoA/PCoA, and PCoA/OA. Compared with the lone
ACoA group, the BHI was significantly reduced in the groups of ACoA/OA,
ACoA/PCoA/OA, and LM (Table
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The anatomic variability of the circle of Willis has to be considered for interpretation of our results. In all groups with an OA pathway present, VMR was significantly reduced except for the PCoA/OA group. VMR in the PCoA/OA group was similar to the VMR of the ACoA/PCoA and the lone ACoA groups (with respect to BHI), assuming full functional capacity of the PCoA pathway while the ACoA was absent. Therefore, one has to consider whether the OA in the PCoA/OA group really does contribute to the blood supply of the ipsilateral MCA.30
We used two different methods of VMR testing. The breath-holding method as a carbon dioxidedependent VMR test is comparable to VMR tests that use the full range of mean blood velocity reactivity at hypercapnia and hypocapnia to a highly significant degree.29 Using the full range of blood velocity reactivity during hypercapnia and hypocapnia for VMR evaluation, Ringelstein et al4 found a well-preserved VMR when collateral supply was provided through a patent ACoA, PCoA, or ACoA/PCoA irrespective of the blood flow direction in the OA; they found a significantly decreased VMR when collateral supply was provided through the OA only. Because of the different classification of the groups of collateral pathways, our results cannot be compared directly with theirs. As long as an OA pathway was absent in our patients, VMR with respect to the BHI was good and was not different between the ACoA and ACoA/PCoA groups, which is in accordance with the results of Ringelstein et al. However, contrary to their findings we found a decreased VMR in most of the patients with a blood supply through the circle of Willis when accompanied by an OA pathway. In previous rCBF studies,8 12 15 the autoregulatory capacity ipsilateral to an ICA occlusion was decreased at least only slightly when the collateralization was provided through the circle of Willis accompanied by an OA pathway. These results are more in accord with those of Ringelstein et al.4 That we found a significant VMR decrease in the presence of an OA pathway may be due to the inhomogeneity of our total group of patients. One fourth of the relevant ICAs exhibited a stenosis of more than 90%, a condition in which VMR can be decreased to a greater extent than in ICA occlusion.24 Additionally, the hemodynamic effects of the contralateral ICA stenoses have to be considered. A decreased VMR ipsilateral to an ICA occlusion has been reported to be associated with a stenosis of more than 50% of the contralateral ICA.12 31 Although not significant in our patients, VMR ipsilateral to the investigated ICA was lower in the instances with a contralateral ICA stenosis than in those without a contralateral stenosis. Such hemodynamic considerations may partly explain that the collateral supply through the circle of Willis was impaired in the ACoA/OA, ACoA/PCoA/OA, and LM groups. Particularly in our LM group, four of the six patients exhibited an additional contralateral ICA stenosis of 50% or more.
The acetazolamide test was additionally performed by us because the acetazolamide challenge has been reported to differentiate more accurately between various subgroups of patients with occlusive carotid artery disease.24 31 By means of the BHI the collateral supply was similarly adequate in the lone ACoA, ACoA/PCoA, and PCoA/OA groups. Our %VMRacet findings, however, indicate a most dominant position of the ACoA pathway within these three groups.
To summarize, our study demonstrates the ability of TCD to conclusively evaluate the relationship between VMR and the collateral pathways, including the concept of their stepwise recruitment. When the circle of Willis is not sufficient, the OA pathway seems the first to be recruited. The presence of leptomeningeal pathways indicates the most compromised collateral supply. Cerebral angiography is risky and should be considered carefully when collateral pathways are to be examined. However, TCD investigations rely strongly on the experience of the examiner.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
Received March 7, 1995; revision received June 15, 1995; accepted November 7, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Sloan, A. V. Alexandrov, C. H. Tegeler, M. P. Spencer, L. R. Caplan, E. Feldmann, L. R. Wechsler, D. W. Newell, C. R. Gomez, V. L. Babikian, et al. Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology, May 11, 2004; 62(9): 1468 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lee, C. G. Choi, D. K. Kim, G. E. Kim, H. K. Lee, and D. C. Suh Relationship Between Circle of Willis Morphology on 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiograms and Transient Ischemia During Vascular Clamping of the Internal Carotid Artery During Carotid Endarterectomy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 558 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brozici, A. van der Zwan, and B. Hillen Anatomy and Functionality of Leptomeningeal Anastomoses: A Review Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2750 - 2762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Liebeskind Collateral Circulation Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2279 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Reinhard, M. Roth, T. Muller, M. Czosnyka, J. Timmer, and A. Hetzel Cerebral Autoregulation in Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease Assessed From Spontaneous Blood Pressure Fluctuations by the Correlation Coefficient Index Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2138 - 2144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H.C. Bisschops, C. J.M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, A. C. van Huffelen, and J. van der Grond Collateral flow and ischemic brain lesions in patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion Neurology, May 13, 2003; 60(9): 1435 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vernieri, P. Pasqualetti, M. Matteis, F. Passarelli, E. Troisi, P. M. Rossini, C. Caltagirone, and M. Silvestrini Effect of Collateral Blood Flow and Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity on the Outcome of Carotid Artery Occlusion Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1552 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Markus and M. Cullinane Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusion Brain, March 1, 2001; 124(3): 457 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, A. C. van Huffelen, G. H. Visser, A. Algra, C. A. F. Tulleken, and J. van Gijn Recurrent ischemia in symptomatic carotid occlusion: Prognostic value of hemodynamic factors Neurology, December 26, 2000; 55(12): 1806 - 1812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Tegos, E. Kalodiki, S.-S. Daskalopoulou, and A. N. Nicolaides Stroke: Epidemiology, Clinical Picture, and Risk Factors: Part I of III Angiology, October 1, 2000; 51(10): 793 - 808. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Rutgers, C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, A. C. van Huffelen, and J. van der Grond A Longitudinal Study of Collateral Flow Patterns in the Circle of Willis and the Ophthalmic Artery in Patients With a Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 1913 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Hartkamp, J. van der Grond, K. J. van Everdingen, B. Hillen, and W. P. T. M. Mali Circle of Willis Collateral Flow Investigated by Magnetic Resonance Angiography Stroke, December 1, 1999; 30(12): 2671 - 2678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kluytmans, J. van der Grond, K. J. van Everdingen, C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, and M. A. Viergever Cerebral Hemodynamics in Relation to Patterns of Collateral Flow Stroke, July 1, 1999; 30(7): 1432 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Derdeyn, A. Shaibani, C. J. Moran, D. T. Cross III, R. L. Grubb Jr, and W. J. Powers Lack of Correlation Between Pattern of Collateralization and Misery Perfusion in Patients With Carotid Occlusion Stroke, May 1, 1999; 30(5): 1025 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Eicke, E. Buss, R. R. Bahr, G. Hajak, and W. Paulus Influence of Acetazolamide and CO2 on Extracranial Flow Volume and Intracranial Blood Flow Velocity Stroke, January 1, 1999; 30(1): 76 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Doblar, N. V. Plyushcheva, W. Jordan, and H. McDowell Predicting the Effect of Carotid Artery Occlusion During Carotid Endarterectomy : Comparing Transcranial Doppler Measurements and Cerebral Angiography Stroke, October 1, 1998; 29(10): 2038 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kluytmans, J. van der Grond, B. C. Eikelboom, and M. A. Viergever Long-Term Hemodynamic Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, August 1, 1998; 29(8): 1567 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, C. A. F. Tulleken, and J. van Gijn Symptomatic Carotid Artery Occlusion : A Reappraisal of Hemodynamic Factors Stroke, October 1, 1997; 28(10): 2084 - 2093. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. van Everdingen, C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, W. P. T. M. Mali, and J. van der Grond MRA Flow Quantification in Patients With a Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Stroke, August 1, 1997; 28(8): 1595 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Visser, A. C. van Huffelen, G. H. Wieneke, and B. C. Eikelboom Bilateral Increase in CO2 Reactivity After Unilateral Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, May 1, 1997; 28(5): 899 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Gur, I. Bova, and N. M. Bornstein Is Impaired Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity a Predictive Factor of Stroke in Asymptomatic Patients? Stroke, December 1, 1996; 27(12): 2188 - 2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |