(Stroke. 1996;27:593-598.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Public Health Sciences (C.L., C.D.F., L.E.W.), Department of Anesthesia (A.T.R., D.A.S.), Department of Neurology (L.C., B.T.T.), and Division of Surgical Sciences (J.W.H.), Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Correspondence to Dr C. Legault, Department of Public Health Sciences, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063. E-mail Legault@phs.bgsm.wfu.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Enrollment for a total of 400 patients started in May 1992 and was stopped in September 1994, with 150 patients randomized to the study. Nimodipine was given to the patients during the perioperative period. Patients underwent examinations before surgery and at approximately 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Major adverse events, including deaths and strokes, were monitored monthly. The trial was terminated early because of both an unexpected disparity in death rates between groups and a lack of evidence of a beneficial effect of nimodipine. New deficits were observed in 72% of the placebo group versus 77% of the nimodipine group (P=.55). In the 6-month follow-up period, 8 deaths (10.7%) occurred in the nimodipine group (n=75) compared with 1 death (1.3%) in the placebo group (n=74) (P=.02). Major bleeding occurred in 10 patients in the nimodipine group versus 3 in the placebo group (13.3% versus 4.1%; P=.04). Six (46.2%) of the 13 patients with major bleeding died compared with 3 deaths (2.2%) among the 136 patients without major bleeding.
Conclusions Our findings add to the growing evidence that calcium antagonists have a prohemorrhagic effect in some patients and suggest that nimodipine use should be restricted perioperatively in patients scheduled for cardiac valve replacement.
Key Words: hemorrhage nimodipine complications calcium channel blockers
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Focal dilatations or very small aneurysms in terminal arterioles and capillaries have been observed in humans and animals soon after CPB.8 It has been hypothesized that interventions which might reduce the development of emboli, increase cerebral blood flow, or protect against anoxic brain-cell damage may decrease the incidence and severity of neurological deficits after cardiac surgery. Nimodipine, a potent vasodilator with a possible neuroprotective effect mediated through a direct neuronal action, met two of these criteria.9 Thus, we designed a clinical trial to determine whether nimodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, reduced the combined incidence of new neurological, neuro-ophthalmologic, or neuropsychological deficits 1 week after CVR surgery.
This report describes the design of the trial and the baseline characteristics of the study population and reviews the early termination of the trial because of both an unexpected disparity in death rates between the placebo- and nimodipine-treated patients and a lack of evidence of a beneficial effect of nimodipine. The rationale for the termination of the trial and plausible harmful, underlying drug actions are discussed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
If one assumes that at least 50% of the patients would experience one
or more deficits 1 week after surgery, a total sample size of 400
patients would provide 90% power at the 5% two-sided level of
significance to detect a 17% difference (from .5 to .33 or .5 to .67)
in the proportion of patients with deficits. The assumed attrition rate
was
4%. A blocked randomization system stratified by surgeon (eight
strata) was used. A randomization table in a password-protected
computer account was accessible only to the study programmer and
biostatistician. A paper copy of the randomization code was kept by the
pharmacy that distributed the study medications.
Population
Enrollment for a total of 400 patients started in May 1992 with
a goal of 8 patients per month for the subsequent 4 years. By September
1994, when randomization was suspended, 150 patients had been enrolled.
All patients were English-speaking men and women over the age of 21
years scheduled to undergo elective aortic and/or mitral valve
replacement (with or without aortocoronary bypass grafting)
at the North Carolina Baptist Hospitals. Patients with the following
conditions were excluded: history of symptomatic
Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's
chorea, or any neurodegenerative disease; major depressive disorder or
psychosis in the past 5 years; class IV congestive heart failure; renal
failure (serum creatinine >1.8 mg %); left
ventricular ejection fraction <.35; or transmural
myocardial infarction in the previous 30 days. Pregnant women and
patients taking calcium channel blockers were also excluded. All
patients gave informed consent, and the trial was approved by the
institutional review board.
Surgery and Treatment
Standardized procedures were followed as much as possible for
anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesia was induced
with fentanyl (50 µg·kg-1).
Intraoperatively, anesthesia was maintained by constant
infusion of fentanyl (6
mg·kg-1·h-1)
and midazolam (60
mg·kg-1·h-1).
No other anesthetic agents, either inhalant or intravenous,
were administered. CPB was conducted by use of a membrane oxygenator
and an arterial filter. All patients were administered
bovine-lung heparin at a dose sufficient to maintain the
activated clotting time above 400 seconds. During hypothermic
CPB, patients were managed with the temperature-uncorrected method
(
-stat) of PaCO2 management. CVR was
performed in a standard fashion: all patients received ischemic
arrest during replacement, with myocardial protection afforded by cold
cardioplegia. The effect of heparin was reversed at the conclusion of
CPB with equivalent doses of protamine. Blood products were
administered by use of an institutional protocol based on hematocrit
and clotting-factor assessment. At the decision of the surgeon or
anesthesiologist, patients received a procoagulant aminocaproic acid
(Amicar) either before CPB for platelet stabilization or after
surgery for presumed hyperfibrinolysis.
An initial dose of 60 mg nimodipine (2 capsules) or a matching placebo was given 12 hours before surgery. One capsule (30 mg) was given 6 hours after the initial dose. The last preoperative dose (30 mg) was given in the holding room of the operating room just before surgery. Within an hour of the patient's arrival at the ICU, the oral administration of the drug (30 mg) was resumed and continued every 6 hours for the first 5 days after the day of surgery, for a total of 26 capsules per patient. Study medication and matching placebo were provided by Miles Inc, West Haven, Conn.
Examinations
Patients underwent a standardized neurological,
neuro-ophthalmologic, and neuropsychological examination before
surgery and at approximately 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after
surgery. Neurological deficits were graded and recorded on the NIH
stroke scale.10 The neuro-ophthalmologic examination
emphasized the assessment of visual function (visual field defects,
retinal emboli, optic-nerve infarction, etc) and oculomotor
function. Eleven neuropsychological tests were administered, including
visual reaction time, nonverbal memory and Rey auditory verbal
memory,11 trail-making tests A and B,12
and the grooved-peg board,13
finger-tapping,14 digit-symbol,2 and
letter-cancellation tasks.15
As part of the trial protocol, a deficit was defined as (1) a new neurological deficit (based on the NIH stroke scale), including a new postoperative deficit, an exacerbation of a preexisting deficit, a stroke, or death associated with a neurological deficit; (2) a new neuro-ophthalmologic deficit or an exacerbation of a preexisting deficit; or (3) deterioration that exceeded 20% of preoperative performance in two or more neuropsychological tests. Major bleeding during the perioperative period was defined as (1) bleeding that required transfusion of more than 10 U of blood products during the operative period or (2) postoperative chest-tube drainage that exceeded 2400 mL in the first 24 hours. This definition, adapted from criteria reported by Woodman and Harker,16 was established after 13 major bleeding episodes were noted.
Data Analysis and Monitoring
Differences between groups were assessed with
2, Fisher's exact, and Student's
t tests. Log-transformed data were analyzed when
normality assumptions were not met. Kaplan-Meier techniques,
log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to
compare survival curves. Binary outcomes were analyzed with
logistic regression and likelihood ratio tests.
Major adverse events were monitored monthly in a nonblinded fashion by an epidemiologist in the Data Management Team. These events included deaths, strokes, cardiac arrests that required cardiopulmonary resuscitation, arrhythmias that required cardioversion, major adverse reactions to the study drug, rehospitalizations, and repeat cardiac surgery.
An independent EAC was appointed to monitor the progress of the trial and the safety of the patients during the trial. The EAC consisted of three clinicians, one biostatistician, and an ex officio member of the sponsor (NINDS). The EAC met 6, 18, and 30 months after the initiation of the study.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In November 1994, the EAC recommended termination of the trial. The rationale included an unexpected, statistically significant, greater mortality rate in patients randomized to the active treatment compared with patients in the placebo group and a lack of observed beneficial effect of nimodipine on the reduction of cerebrovascular complications. A brief report of the termination of the trial was published in March 1995.17
Population
Between May 1992 and September 1994, 356 patients were screened,
177 of whom were found to be ineligible. The main reasons for
ineligibility included inability to comply with the study protocol
(46%); use of a calcium channel blocker (29%); presence of congestive
heart failure, cirrhosis, or renal failure (24%); and
life-threatening intercurrent illness (15%). Subjects may have had
more than one excluding condition. Twenty-nine eligible patients
refused to participate in the study. One of the 150 randomized patients
was excluded because he did not undergo valve replacement at the time
of surgery. This report is based on 149 patients, 75 of whom were
randomized to nimodipine treatment and 74 to placebo.
The randomization process resulted in a similar distribution of patient
characteristics, with few statistically significant differences in
demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups
(Table
). On average, approximately half the patients
were female, 95% were white, and 17% currently smoked, and the
average age was 60 years. Approximately 25% were undergoing a repeat
surgery and >60% had the aortic valve replaced as opposed to
40%
for the mitral valve. At least three fourths of the patients were class
II or III according to the New York Heart Association Classification. A
higher proportion of patients assigned to the nimodipine group had a
history of pulmonary disease (23% versus 9%;
P=.03) and congestive heart failure (56% versus 38%;
P=.03) compared with the placebo group.
|
All patients received heparin intraoperatively. The average dose was 30 629±11 631 U in the nimodipine group compared with 29 662±9444 U in the placebo group (P=.58), and the dose did not vary significantly among surgeons (P=.40). Fifty-six percent of the patients in the nimodipine group received a procoagulant aminocaproic acid during surgery as opposed to 36% in the placebo group (P=.02). On average, there was no significant difference in dose (8.9±3.6 versus 8.8±4.4 g) between the nimodipine and placebo groups for those who received aminocaproic acid.
The follow-up rates 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery were 92%, 82%, and 69%, respectively, for the placebo group versus 87%, 80%, and 65% for the nimodipine group. Overall, 77% of the patients complied with the medication regimen (ie, at least 80% of the pills were consumed). No difference in compliance was observed between treatment groups.
Mortality and Morbidity
Eight deaths occurred in the treatment group and one in the
placebo group (10.7% versus 1.3%), for an overall mortality rate of
6.0% (hazard ratio=8.0, P=.02). In the nimodipine group,
seven of the eight patients died within 37 days of surgery. The one
death in the placebo group occurred 2 days after surgery and was the
result of surgical trauma to the heart during sternotomy. The
age-adjusted hazard for the nimodipine group was 5.7 times
the corresponding hazard for the placebo group
(P=.05). After separate adjustment for history of
congestive heart failure and history of pulmonary disease, the
hazard ratios were 6.0 (P=.04) and 6.6 (P=.03),
respectively.
In the nimodipine group, two patients experienced arrhythmia that required cardioversion and two others were resuscitated after cardiac arrest. Among patients who were discharged, 17 were rehospitalized during the 6 months after surgery, 10 of them in the nimodipine group.
Major bleeding was observed in several patients who died; therefore, a
detailed review was undertaken. Seven patients in the nimodipine group
and 2 in the placebo group received more than 10 U of blood
products during surgery (Fig 1
). Five patients in
the nimodipine and 2 in the placebo group lost >2400 mL of blood
during the first 24 hours in the ICU (Fig 2
). Major
bleeding, as defined previously, occurred in 10 patients in the
nimodipine group (13.3%) compared with 3 patients (4.1%) in the
placebo group (OR=3.6, P=.04). (Bleeding data for 1 patient
who dropped out of the study early were not available at the time of a
previous report.17 ) Adjustment for age did not affect the
OR (OR=3.6, P=.04). None of the 6 patients who had both
aortic and mitral valve replacements experienced major bleeding. There
was no significant difference in the proportions of patients with major
bleeding among surgeons (P=.07). ORs remained
3 after
adjustment for pulmonary disease (OR=3.5, P=.05) and
congestive heart failure (OR=3.0, P=.09), although the
probability value for congestive heart failure was borderline.
|
|
Of the 13 patients who experienced major bleeding, 6 died, 5 of whom were in the nimodipine group. As reported earlier,17 3 of these 5 deaths were a direct result of blood loss and the other 2 were due to multiple organ failure associated with significant blood loss. Three other patients in the nimodipine group who did not experience major bleeding died of multiple organ failure, and bleeding was a possible contributing cause in 2 patients with postoperative chest-tube drainage >1600 mL during the first 24 hours in the ICU. Thus, 6 (46.2%) of 13 patients who met the definition of major bleeding died compared with 3 (2.2%) of 136 patients without major bleeding.
Overall, 72% of the patients in the placebo group had new deficits 1 week after surgery versus 77% in the nimodipine group (P=.55). One month after surgery, 46% of patients in the placebo group had deficits compared with their baseline status versus 50% in the nimodipine group (P=.71). At the end of the 6-month follow-up period, these percentages were 44% and 26%, respectively (P=.09). Of these deficits, only one patient had a stroke; all others had less severe deficits based on neurological and neuropsychological tests. A detailed report of these deficits is being prepared.
Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the median postoperative length of stay of the survivors (7 days for the placebo group versus 8 for the nimodipine group; P=.08), the overall distributions of postoperative length of stay were significantly different between the two groups (P=.0001 by log-rank test). Twelve patients in the nimodipine group were hospitalized for more than 13 days compared with two in the placebo group.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Excess bleeding may be the clinical result of the combination of vasodilation and the antiplatelet actions of calcium antagonists. These agents have been shown to inhibit platelet aggregation in vitro.20 21 22 23 Proposed mechanisms of action suggest that calcium antagonists reduce the release of thromboxane A2,24 25 26 antagonize the calmodulin stimulation of phosphodiesterase,25 27 and inhibit both the serotonin uptake of endothelial cells28 and the breakdown of cyclic AMP.29 More recently, Akopov and Sarkisian30 showed that nifedipine reduced platelet activity in subjects with essential hypertension in two ways: directly, via action on platelets; and indirectly, by increasing red-cell deformability. In dogs, nifedipine reduced thrombus formation in femoral artery grafts31 ; however, platelet function was unaffected in 12 young, healthy volunteers who took 30 mg nimodipine qid for 24 hours.32
The surgical setting provides exposure to other factors that could interact with nimodipine to increase bleeding risk. Compounds such as anticoagulants, antifibrinolytic agents, and several platelet inhibitors in combination could have profound effects on the hemostatic mechanism, resulting in increased risk of hemorrhage.19 CPB affects both platelet count and function: platelet function decreases rapidly, bleeding time is significantly prolonged, and platelet aggregation is impaired. Platelet count, in particular, requires several days to return to preoperative levels.16
Several aspects of the study design provide strength to the validity of the findings reported herein. The trial was a randomized, blinded, clinical trial. Most variables assessed at baseline showed similar distributions in the nimodipine and placebo groups. Blood loss during the perioperative period was quantified as part of the trial protocol, and the definition of major bleeding was based on criteria previously reported. The excess episodes of major bleeding in the nimodipine group occurred despite the fact that significantly more patients treated with nimodipine received a procoagulant (Amicar) compared with control subjects. Finally, the association between major bleeding and treatment remained strong even after we controlled for predictors associated with bleeding.
In conclusion, our observation of major bleeding associated with the use of nimodipine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery has not been reported previously. It is unknown whether this finding applies to other dihydropyridines or to other types of calcium antagonists and whether all patients undergoing major surgery are at risk of major bleeding. Our findings add to the growing evidence that calcium antagonists in some patients have a prohemorrhagic effect and suggest that nimodipine use should be restricted perioperatively in patients scheduled for CVR.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 16, 1996; accepted February 13, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Hammeke TA, Hastings JE. Neuropsychologic alterations after cardiac operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:326-331. [Abstract]
3. Gardner TJ, Horneffer PJ, Manolio TA. Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: a ten year study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;40:574-581.[Abstract]
4. National Cardiac Surgery Database. Second Annual Report. Chicago, Ill: Society of Thoracic Surgeons; January 1993.
5. Newman S, Klinger L, Venn G, Smith P, Harrison M, Treasure T. The persistence of neuropsychological deficits twelve months after coronary artery bypass surgery. In: Willner AE, Rodewald G, eds. Impact of Cardiac Surgery on the Quality of Life. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Corp; 1990:173-179.
6. Newman S. The incidence and nature of neuropsychological morbidity following cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 1989;4:93-100.
7. Blauth CI, Arnold JV, Schulenberg WE, McCartney AC, Taylor KM. Cerebral microembolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95:668-676. [Abstract]
8. Moody DM, Bell MA, Challa VR, Johnson WE, Prough DS. Brain microemboli during cardiac surgery or aortography. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:477-486. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Wadworth AN, McTavish D. Nimodipine: a review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic efficacy in cerebral disorders. Drugs Aging. 1992;2:262-286. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG,
Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Rberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M,
Moomaw CJ, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction:
a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864-870.
11.
Harrison MJG, Schneidau A, Ho R, Smith PLC, Newman S,
Treasure T. Cerebrovascular disease and functional outcome after
coronary artery bypass surgery. Stroke. 1989;20:235-237.
12. Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8:271-276.
13.
Grant I, Prigatano GP, Heaton RK, McSweeny AJ, Wright
EC, Adams KM. Progressive neuropsychologic impairment and
hypoxemia: relationship in chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:999-1006.
14. Reitan RM, Davidson LA. Clinical Neuropsychology: Current Status and Applications. New York, NY: Winston/Wiley; 1974.
15. Diller L, Ben-Yishay Y, Gerstman LJ, Goodkin W, Weinberg J. Studies in Cognition and Rehabilitation in Hemiplegia. New York, NY: New York University Medical Center Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine; 1974. Rehabilitation Monograph 50.
16.
Woodman RC, Harker LA. Bleeding complications
associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Blood. 1990;76:1680-1697.
17.
Wagenknecht LE, Furberg CD, Hammon JW, Legault C,
Troost BT. Surgical bleeding: an unexpected effect of a calcium
antagonist. BMJ. 1995;310:776-777.
18.
Gore JM, Sloan M, Price TR, Randall AMY, Bovill E,
Collen D, and the TIMI Investigators. Intracerebral
hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and subdural hematoma
after acute myocardial infarction and
thrombolytic therapy in the Thrombolysis in
Myocardial Infarction study: Thrombolysis in Myocardial
Infarction, phase II, pilot and clinical trial.
Circulation. 1991;83:448-459.
19. Becker RC, Caputo R, Ball S, Corrao JM, Baker S, Gore JM. Hemorrhagic potential of combined diltiazem and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator administration. Am Heart J. 1993;126:11-14. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Takahara K, Kuroiwa A, Matsushima T, Nakashima Y, Takasugi M. Effects of nifedipine on platelet function. Am Heart J. 1985;109:4-8. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Greer IA, Walker JJ, McLaren M. Inhibition of whole blood platelet aggregation by nicardipine, and synergism with prostacyclin in vitro. Thromb Res. 1986;41:509-518. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Jones CR, Pasanisi F, Elliott HL, Reid JL. Effects of verapamil and nisoldipine on human platelets: in vivo and in vitro studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;20:191-196. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Kiyomoto A, Sasaki Y, Odawara A, Morita T. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by diltiazem. Circ Res. 1983;52(suppl I):115-119.
24. Davi G, Noso S, Fiore M. Effects by nifedipine on thromboxane synthesis in vitro and in vivo. Thromb Res. 1982;28:837-842. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Jeremy JY, Barradas MA, Mikhailidis DP, Dandona P. An investigation into the effects of nifedipine and nimodipine on platelet function and vascular prostacyclin synthesis. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1985;9:645-651.
26. Ring M, Corrigan JJ, Fenster PE. Effects of oral diltiazem on platelet function: alone and in combination with `low dose' aspirin. Thromb Res. 1986;44:391-400. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Epstein PM, Fiss K, Hachisu R, Andrenyak DM. Interaction of calcium antagonists with cyclic AMP phosphodiesterases and calmodulin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982;105:1142-1149. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Lee SL, Long K, Ueda S, Fanburg BL. Verapamil inhibits serotonin uptake of endothelial cells in culture by a mechanism unrelated to Ca2+ channel blockade. J Cell Physiol. 1987;132:178-182. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Moore JB, Fuller BL, Falotico R, Tolman EL. Inhibition of rabbit platelet phosphodiesterase activity and aggregation by calcium channel blockers. Thromb Res. 1985;40:401-411. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Akopov SE, Sarkisian MA. Antiplatelet effect of nifedipine depending on its action on red cell deformability in essential hypertension. Am J Ther. 1995;2:10-14. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Pumphrey CW, Fuster V, Dewanjee MK, Chesebro JH, Vlietstra RE, Kaye MP. Comparison of the antithrombotic action of calcium antagonist drugs with dipyridamole in dogs. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:591-595. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Feinberg WM, Bruck DC. Effect of oral nimodipine
on platelet function. Stroke. 1993;24:10-13.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Kadoi Pharmacological Neuroprotection During Cardiac Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2007; 15(2): 167 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dorotta, P. Kimball-Jones, and R. Applegate II Deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest in adults. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2007; 11(1): 66 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Hogue Jr, C. A. Palin, and J. E. Arrowsmith Cardiopulmonary bypass management and neurologic outcomes: an evidence-based appraisal of current practices. Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 21 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Butterworth, L. E. Wagenknecht, C. Legault, D. J. Zaccaro, N. D. Kon, J. W. Hammon Jr, A. T. Rogers, B. T. Troost, D. A. Stump, C. D. Furberg, et al. Attempted control of hyperglycemia during cardiopulmonary bypass fails to improve neurologic or neurobehavioral outcomes in patients without diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1319 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Prasongsukarn and M. A. Borger Reducing Cerebral Emboli During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2005; 9(2): 153 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Wijeysundera, W. S. Beattie, V. Rao, J. Ivanov, and K. Karkouti Calcium antagonists are associated with reduced mortality after cardiac surgery: a propensity analysis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 755 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Wijeysundera, W. S. Beattie, V. Rao, and J. Karski Calcium antagonists reduce cardiovascular complications after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1496 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Butterworth and J. W. Hammon Lidocaine for Neuroprotection: More Evidence of Efficacy Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1131 - 1133. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wang, X. Wu, J. Li, F. Xiao, X. Liu, and M. Meng The Effect of Lidocaine on Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1134 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D C Whitaker, J Stygall, and S P Newman Neuroprotection during cardiac surgery: strategies to reduce cognitive decline Perfusion, March 1, 2002; 17(2_suppl): 69 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Murkin Attenuation of neurologic injury during cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): S1838 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Kizer and S. E. Kimmel Epidemiologic Review of the Calcium Channel Blocker Drugs: An Up-to-date Perspective on the Proposed Hazards Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2001; 161(9): 1145 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Neville, J. Butterworth, R. L. James, J. W. Hammon, and D. A. Stump Similar neurobehavioral outcome after valve or coronary artery operations despite differing carotid embolic counts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2001; 121(1): 0125 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Garcia Rodriguez, C. Cattaruzzi, M. G. Troncon, and L. Agostinis Risk of Hospitalization for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding Associated With Ketorolac, Other Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Calcium Antagonists, and Other Antihypertensive Drugs Arch Intern Med, January 12, 1998; 158(1): 33 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |