(Stroke. 1996;27:1105-1111.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Neurologische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Correspondence to Otto W. Witte, MD, Neurologische Klinik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail witte@leukos.neurologie-uni-duesseldorf.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We induced focal lesions in the sensory area at the border of the motor and occipital cortices by injecting the photosensitizing dye rose bengal and illuminating the skull stereotaxically. Seven days after induction of photothrombosis, electrophysiological recordings were obtained with standard methods from 400-µm-thick neocortical coronal slices. As an indication of inhibition we used a paired-pulse stimulus protocol and calculated a ratio of the amplitudes of the second versus the first excitatory postsynaptic potential.
Results In lesioned animals we found a significant increase of the ratio over a wide zone of the neocortex, both ipsilateral and contralateral, compared with unlesioned animals.
Conclusions Our results suggest that a neocortical infarction leads to hyperexcitability not only in its direct vicinity but also in the contralateral hemisphere. Such hyperexcitability may contribute to increased activation of contralateral brain areas and to functional reorganization after stroke.
Key Words: cerebral ischemia diaschisis rats photothrombosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
According to the original description of von Monakow,1 diaschisis is a usually transient alteration of brain function remote from the lesion. These alterations may involve resting blood flow, brain metabolism, and spontaneous or evoked electrophysiological activity of the brain.3 4 5 In humans, CBF has been reported to be decreased contralateral to the infarction, particularly in the mirror area, 7 to 14 days after inception of the lesion.6 7 8 In the following months this recovers. Animal studies have also revealed a decrease of contralateral blood flow that can be observed several hours after the insult and persists for several days.9 Likewise, cerebral metabolism was found to be decreased in the contralateral hemisphere of patients for several weeks.10 In contrast, the metabolic effects persisted for only 24 hours in a study that involved middle cerebral artery occlusion11 and less than 5 days after photochemical cortical infarction.12 In addition, a contralateral decrease of protein metabolism was found when investigated 72 hours after middle cerebral artery occlusion.13
In humans, systematic studies of contralateral electric cerebral activity are only available for the subacute and chronic phases of the lesion. At these times, bilateral slowing of the electroencephalographic recording has been observed occasionally.14 Two weeks after injury, the majority of patients showed an increase of the contralateral N22 component of somatosensory evoked potentials.15 16 17 In agreement with this, Hossmann et al18 found an increase of somatosensory evoked potential amplitudes in rat brain in the first 24 hours after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Studies concerning chronic alterations of brain electrophysiological activity in animal experiments are not yet available.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the chronic effects of a unilateral photothrombotic lesion on the electrophysiological properties of the contralateral brain.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electrophysiological recordings were obtained in unlesioned controls and on day 6 to 7 after surgery in lesioned animals. This time point was chosen because the infarct has then reached a stable volume and the brain water content has returned to control values.19 After ether anesthesia, the rats were decapitated, and the brain was rapidly removed (mean, 128±16 seconds). It was cut into coronal slices of 400 µm by a McIllwain tissue chopper. The slices were maintained in an interface recording chamber at 33°C and superfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing (in mmol/L) NaCl 124, NaHCO3 26, KCl 5, CaCl2 2, MgSO4 2, NaHPO4 1.25, and glucose 10, equilibrated with carbogen (95% O2 and 5% CO2 to pH 7.4).
Field potentials were recorded by a glass capillary electrode
placed in cortical layer II; the bipolar stimulation electrode was
placed in layer VI beneath the recording electrode.
Registrations were made in 0.5-mm steps ipsilateral and contralateral
to the photothrombotic lesion, moving along the cortex down to the
rhinal fissure (Figure
). The registration sites in
control animals were the same as in lesioned animals. A
double-pulse stimulation protocol was applied to investigate
paired-pulse inhibition (pulses of 50 microseconds per 5 to 40 V
with intervals of 20 milliseconds). At each location a stimulation
amplitude was chosen that yielded maximal fEPSP. A ratio of the
responses of the first and second stimulus was calculated
(Q=fEPSP2/fEPSP1). Values of Q smaller
than 1 indicated that the second response was inhibited by the response
to the first stimulus.
|
For each position mean±SD values were computed. We used Student's t test (one way, type 0) for statistical analysis. A value of P<.01 was considered highly significant; a value of P<.05 indicated a significant difference between the two groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We tested 21 slices from 12 control animals without a lesion.
Throughout the neocortical area the paired pulses evoked two field
potentials with amplitudes of the first fEPSP of 2.25±1.9 mV
reflecting excitatory postsynaptic potentials. A typical
extracellularly recorded field response after paired-pulse
stimulation in unlesioned control animals is shown in the Figure
(right
panel, circles). The ratio of the second to the first fEPSP after
double-pulse stimulation was rather constant (bottom left panel,
circles) and indicated a paired-pulse inhibition at all
investigated positions. Recordings of the left and the right
hemispheres of the controls gave the same results and were pooled.
We examined 28 ipsilateral and 33 slices contralateral to the
infarction from 17 and 18 animals, respectively. Within the lesion,
electrophysiological responses could not be
evoked. In slices from infarcted animals, the second fEPSP was larger
than in slices from control animals and sometimes even larger than the
first fEPSP. The amplitude of the first fEPSP in lesioned animals was
1.84±1.01 mV ipsilateral and 2.06±1.14 mV contralateral. A typical
extracellularly recorded field response after paired-pulse
stimulation in lesioned animals is shown in the Figure
(right panel,
squares). In the ipsilateral part of the neocortex we found a
significant increase of the ratio of fEPSP2 to
fEPSP1 beginning 1 to 2 mm lateral from the lesion border
(positions 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, and 9.5 mm, highly significant; positions 6,
8.5, and 9 mm, significant). A change of excitability was also found in
the contralateral cortex. This was obvious not only in the area
homotopic to the lesion but also in more lateral brain areas.
These results were significant over wide zones of the neocortex
(P
.01 for positions 2, 3, 3.5, 4.5, 5, 6.5, and 7.5 mm;
P
.05 for positions 2.5, 4, 5.5, 7, and 8.5 mm).
In control and lesioned animals, double or multiple discharges were
occasionally found in response to extracellular stimuli, but there were
clear quantitative differences: in control animals these multiple
discharges were observed in 4% and in lesioned animals in more than
30% of the recordings. A typical multiple discharge is shown
in the lowest right panel of the Figure
.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For these investigations, small cortical lesions were produced by photothrombosis. As shown by Watson et al,23 illumination through the skull after intravenous injection of the dye rose bengal produces platelet aggregation (photothrombosis) in small vessels. This lesion model has the advantage of being noninvasive and producing lesions with good reproducibility in terms of size and a sharp boundary between infarcted tissue and noninfarcted surrounding brain. Recent studies showed that photothrombosis produces pronounced changes of excitability of the ipsilateral cortex shown by recording of field potentials induced by double-pulse stimuli in vitro24 and in vivo.25 These changes could be detected between 1 and 60 days after the insult, with a progressive decrease of inhibition over the first 5 days and a subsequent though incomplete recovery. Intracellular in vitro studies that reported less negative resting membrane potential and smaller inhibitory postsynaptic potentials provide an explanation for the extracellularly observed hyperexcitability.26 The reduced inhibition was associated with a decrease of GABAA receptor expression.25 Further investigations should clarify whether treatment with GABAergic drugs after photochemical lesioning can alter excitability. These long-lasting alterations of brain excitability contrast with the fast recovery of CBF and metabolism in the same model. Dietrich et al9 showed that local CBF is impaired after photothrombosis. In the acute phase CBF was depressed in the ipsilateral hemisphere, whereas the contralateral hemisphere was rather hyperemic. Five days after induction of thrombosis, both hemispheres showed decreased CBF compared with that in unlesioned controls. After 15 days CBF had returned to normal. Little change in contralateral glucose utilization has been reported 24 hours after induction of photothrombosis in the rat.12 27 In our laboratory we noted hypometabolism in the corresponding area contralateral to a photothrombotic lesion, which did not gain significance (M. Kraemer, personal communication). Reduced glucose metabolism reflects decreased transmitter release.28 We can speculate that this decreased transmitter release leads to impairment of both excitation and inhibition.
Which mechanism can be responsible for the observed electrophysiological diaschisis? In previous studies concerning the decrease of inhibition in the hemisphere ipsilateral to an infarction, [K+] elevation and electroencephalographic suppression during CSD were discussed as causes of the alteration of inhibition.24 The present data show that the change of excitability occurs not only on the side of the lesion but also at the contralateral hemisphere, where no CSD was observed. In further studies with the noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist dizoclipine (MK-801), which prevents CSD, we investigated whether ipsilateral hyperexcitability can indeed be prevented by blocking CSD. The examination revealed that CSD blockade does not reduce increased excitability after photothrombotic infarction.29 It is therefore highly unlikely that CSD alone is responsible for the described pathophysiology.
Humoral mechanisms are another possible cause of remote effects after infarction and the development of diaschisis. Cerebral infarction leads to a lack of oxygen, which in turn is followed by changes in neurotransmitter levels. This can be due to disordered neurotransmitter storage, uptake, and release.30 31 Subsequent to impaired neurotransmitter levels, several cascades, eg, the arachidonic acid cascade,31 are activated, which may contribute to the development of diaschisis. In addition, brain edema and increased intracranial pressure may contribute to neuronal impairment of excitability.33 34 35 However, in our model we found no signs of significant brain edema or increased intracranial pressure, and Evans blue experiments did not indicate a disruption of the blood-brain barrier in contralateral brain areas (G. Hagemann, M. Kraemer, D.W. Witte, unpublished observations, 1995).
One of the most obvious explanations for the observed electrophysiological diaschisis is deafferentation. As early as 1914 von Monakow1 postulated that there must be severance of fiber tracts between the lesion and remote areas of functional depression and subsequent deafferentation. Andrews3 coined the term transhemispheric diaschisis as opposed to transcallosal diaschisis to stress that information transfer to the other cortical hemisphere can be accomplished on many different levels. However, by far the most direct connections from one hemisphere to the other occur through the corpus callosum.36 CBF and evoked potential changes in the contralateral hemisphere in acute ischemia experiments seem to be dependent on an intact corpus callosum.37 38 Staining experiments have revealed that the hindlimb area and the parietal cortex 1, the site of infarction in this study, are sources of afferents to several other areas: the contralateral hindlimb, the contralateral parietal cortex 1, the ipsilateral cortex 2, and the ipsilateral motor cortex36 39 (only mentioned are afferents to neocortical areas). These dependent cortical areas correlate quite well with the brain regions that show an impaired excitability in our electrophysiological experiments. An analysis based on the stereotaxic atlas of Paxinos and Watson20 indicated that ipsilaterally parietal areas 1 and 2 and contralaterally parietal area 1 and the homotopic areas of the lesion were afflicted. Erb and Povlishock40 showed early GABAergic terminal loss with a prolonged recovery of 1 year after traumatic brain injury in the cat. Reduced GABAA receptor binding was shown in our model.25 These observations support the assumption that neuroanatomic changes are responsible for the reported hyperexcitability.
Changes in hyperexcitability are adaptive changes and therefore a measure of plasticity after stroke. In view of our observations of impaired excitability after neocortical infarction, one can discuss both a detrimental and a beneficial role of this hyperexcitability. Kotila and Waltimo41 reported that 14% of patients with ischemic brain infarction developed epilepsy, mostly generalized seizures; 20% of these patients had their first seizure within the first 2 weeks after stroke, and 60% developed epilepsy within the first 6 months. Jordan42 reported that nonconvulsive seizures occurred in 34% of neurology intensive care unit patients. The widespread alteration of inhibition may correlate with the occurrence of epilepsy after stroke. A rebalanced excitability may therefore be a sign of recovery from brain infarction. Glassman and Malamut43 44 reported a correlation between recovery of behavior and normalization of the evoked potentials in intact cortex adjacent to a lesion.
Schallert and Lindner45 addressed the question of whether rescuing neurons from transsynaptic brain damage may be helpful, harmful, or neutral in recovery of function: Asymmetries in motor behavior after unilateral anteromedial cortex lesion are usually transient; with treatment by diazepam or phenobarbital, which enhance GABAergic inhibition, the functional asymmetries become more severe.46 47 This suggests that hyperexcitability counteracts the lesion-induced loss of function and may serve as an endogenous source of stimulation.
In humans, Weiller48 reported that CBF is changed ipsilateral and contralateral to a motor cortex lesion during a defined task performance. Areas at rest showed a lower CBF in patients than in control subjects, whereas CBF was increased in cortical areas mainly in the undamaged hemisphere.49 Chollet and Weiller50 speculated that homologous regions compensate for the function of the damaged hemisphere or that activity is redistributed to areas adjacent to the lesion. An extension of the area that is activated with a certain motor task has also been observed in other experiments and has usually been interpreted as an indication of plasticity.51 52 In light of the present experiments, however, it cannot be excluded that such remote and altered activation patterns indicate a functional disturbance and hyperexcitability in these areas remote from the lesion itself. Thus, it is conceivable that such changes indicate adaptation and favor recovery; on the other hand, it is conceivable that they indicate hyperexcitability and impaired processing of incoming information. To resolve this ambiguity, behavioral studies correlated with these altered excitability patterns are necessary in both animals with cortical lesions and humans suffering from stroke.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 6, 1995; revision received February 13, 1996; accepted February 14, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Baron JC, Bousser MG, Comar D, Castaigne P. `Crossed cerebellar diaschisis' in human supratentorial brain infarction. Trans Am Neurol Assoc.. 1980;105:459-461.
3.
Andrews RJ. Transhemispheric
diaschisis. Stroke. 1991;22:943-949.
4.
Feeney DM, Baron JC. Diaschisis.
Stroke. 1986;17:817-830.
5. Meyer JS, Hata T, Imai A. Clinical and experimental studies of diaschisis. In: Wood JH, ed. Cerebral Blood Flow: Physiologic and Clinical Aspects. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co; 1987:481-502.
6. Baron JC. Pathophysiology of acute cerebral ischemia: PET studies in humans. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1991;1(suppl 1):22-31.
7.
Lagrèze HL, Levine RL, Pedula KL, Nickels RJ,
Sunderland JS, Rowe BR. Contralateral flow reduction in
unilateral stroke: evidence for transhemispheric diaschisis.
Stroke. 1987;18:882-886.
8.
Dobkin JA, Levine RL, Lagrèze HL, Dulli DA,
Nickels RJ, Rowe BR. Evidence for transhemispheric diaschisis in
unilateral stroke. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:1333-1336.
9. Dietrich WD, Ginsberg MD, Busto R, Watson BD. Photochemical induced cortical infarction in the rat, I: time course of hemodynamic consequences. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1986;6:187-194.
10.
Wise R, Gibbs J, Frackowiak RS, Marshall J, Jones
T. No evidence for transhemispheric diaschisis after human
cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1986;17:853-861.
11.
Kataoka K, Hayakawa T, Yamada K, Mushiroi T, Kuroda R,
Mogami H. Neuronal network disturbance after
ischemia in rats. Stroke. 1989;20:1226-1235.
12. Ginsberg MD, Castella Y, Dietrich WD, Watson BD, Busto R. Acute thrombotic infarction suppresses metabolic activation of ipsilateral somatosensory cortex: evidence for functional diaschisis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1989;9:329-341.
13. Mies G, Kohno K, Hossmann K-A. MK-801, a glutamate antagonist, lowers flow threshold for inhibition of protein synthesis after middle cerebral artery occlusion of rat. Neurosci Lett. 1993;155:65-68. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Meyer JS, Shinohara Y, Kanda T, Fukuuchi Y, Ericsson
AD, Kok NK. Diaschisis resulting from acute unilateral cerebral
infarction. Arch Neurol. 1970;23:241-247.
15. Obeso JA, Marti-Masso JF, Carrera N. Somatosensory evoked potentials over the non-affected hemisphere in patients: abnormalities with focal brain lesions remote from the primary sensorimotor area. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980;49:59-65. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Nakashima K, Kanda T, Fujimoto K, Sato T, Takahashi K. Somatosensory evoked potentials over the non-affected hemisphere in patients with unilateral cerebrovascular lesions. J Neurol Sci. 1985;70:117-127. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Melamed E, Lavy S, Portnoy Z, Sadan S, Carmon A. Correlation between regional cerebral blood flow and EEG frequency of the contralateral hemisphere in acute cerebral infarction. J Neurol Sci. 1975;26:21-27. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Hossmann K-A, Mies G, Paschen W, Csiba L, Bodsch W, Rapin JR, Le Poncin-Lafitte M, Takahashi L. Multiparametric imaging of blood flow and metabolism after middle cerebral artery occlusion in cats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985;5:97-107. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Grome JJ, Gojowczky G, Hofmann W, Graham DI. Quantitation of photochemically induced focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1988;8:89-95. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. London, UK: Academic Press Inc; 1986.
21.
Kapur J, Stringer JL, Lothmann EW. Evidence that
repetitive seizures in the hippocampus cause a lasting reduction of
GABAergic inhibition. J Neurophysiol. 1989;61:417-426.
22. Luhmann HJ, Kral T, Heinemann U. Influence of hypoxia on excitation and GABAergic inhibition in mature and developing rat neocortex. Exp Brain Res. 1993;97:207-224.
23. Watson BD, Dietrich WD, Busto R, Wachtel MS, Ginsberg MD. Induction of reproducible brain infarctions by photochemically initiated thrombosis. Ann Neurol.. 1985;17:497-504. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Domann R, Hagemann G, Kraemer M, Freund H-J, Witte OW. Electrophysiological changes in the surrounding brain tissue of photochemically induced cortical infarcts in the rat. Neurosci Lett. 1993;155:69-72. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Schiene K, Bruehl C, Zilles K, Qü M, Domann R, Kraemer M, Witte OW. Neuronal hyperexcitability and reduction of GABA receptor expression in the surround of cerebral thrombosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. In press.
26. Neumann-Haefelin T, Hagemann G, Witte OW. Cellular correlates of neuronal hyperexcitability in the vicinity of photochemically induced cortical infarcts in rats in vitro. Neurosci Lett. 1995;193:1-4. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Bruehl C, Witte OW. Cellular activity underlying altered brain metabolism during focal epileptic activity. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:414-420. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Dietrich WD, Ginsberg MD, Busto R, Watson BD. Photochemically induced cortical infarction in the rat, II: acute and subacute alterations in local glucose utilization. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1986;6:195-202. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Buchkremer-Ratzmann I, Witte OW. Periinfarct and transhemispheric diaschisis caused by photothrombotic infarction in rat neocortex is reduced by lubeluzole but not MK-801. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1995;15:S381. Abstract.
30. Choi DW, Rothmann SM. The role of glutamate neurotoxicity in hypoxic-ischemic neuronal death. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:171-182. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Globus MYT, Ginsberg MD, Busto R. Excitotoxic index: a biochemical marker of selective vulnerability. Neurosci Lett. 1991;127:39-42. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Tegtmeier F, Weber C, Heister U, Haker I, Scheller D, Nikolov R, Höller M. Eicosanoids in rat brain during ischemia and reperfusion: correlation to DC depolarization. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990;10:358-364. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Oh SM, Betz AL. Interaction between free
radicals and excitatory amino acids in the formation of
ischemic brain edema in rats. Stroke. 1991;22:915-921.
34. Whittle IR, Ironside JW, Piper IR, Miller JD. Neuropathological and neurophysiological effects of interstitial white matter autologous and non-autologous protein containing solutions: further evidence for a glioma derived permeability factor. Acta Neurochir (Wien).. 1993;120:164-174. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Klatzo I. Pathophysiological aspects of brain edema. Acta Neuropathol (Berl).. 1987;72:236-239. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Saper CB. Diffuse cortical projection systems: anatomical organization and role in cortical function. In: Mountcastle UB, Plum F, Geiger SR, eds. Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System V. Bethesda, Md: American Physiological Society; 1987:169-210.
37. Andrews RJ, Bringas JR, Alonzo G, Salamat MS, Khoshyomn S, Gluck DS. Corpus callosotomy effects on cerebral blood flow and evoked potentials (transcallosal diaschisis). Neurosci Lett. 1993;154:9-12. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Kempinsky WH. Experimental study of distant
effects of acute focal brain injury: a study of diaschisis.
Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1958;79:376-389.
39. Zilles K, Wree A. Cortex: areal and laminar structure. In: Paxinos G, ed. The Rat Nervous System, Volume 1: Forebrain and Midbrain. New York, NY: Academic Press Inc; 1985:375-415.
40. Erb DE, Povlishock JT. Neuroplasticity following traumatic brain injury: a study of GABAergic terminal loss and recovery in the cat dorsal lateral vestibular nucleus. Exp Brain Res. 1990;83:253-267.
41. Kotila M, Waltimo O. Epilepsy after stroke. Epilepsia. 1992;33:495-498. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Jordan KG. Continuous EEG and evoked potential monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care unit. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;10:445-475. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Glassmann RB. Recovery following sensorimotor cortical damage: evoked potentials, brain stimulation and motor control. Exp Neurol. 1971;33:16-29. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Glassmann RB, Malamut DL. Recovery from electroencephalographic slowing and reduced evoked potentials after somatosensory cortical damage in cats. Behav Biol. 1976;17:333-354. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Schallert T, Lindner MD. Rescuing neurons from trans-synaptic degeneration after brain damage: helpful, harmful, or neutral in recovery of function? Can J Psychol. 1990;44,2:276-292.
46. Schallert T, Jones TA, Lindner MD. Multilevel transneuronal degeneration after brain damage: behavioral events of anticonvulsant GABA-related drugs. Stroke. 1990;21(suppl III):III-143-III-146.
47. Schallert T, Hernandez TD, Barth TM. Recovery of function after brain damage: severe and chronic disruption by diazepam. Brain Res. 1986;379:104-111. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Weiller C. Recovery from motor stroke: human positron emission tomography studies. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995;5:282-291.
49. Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, Wise RJ, Frackowiak RS. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:463-472. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Chollet F, Weiller C. Imaging recovery of function following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:226-230. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Weder B, Knorr U, Herzog H, Nebeling B, Kleinschmidt A,
Huang Y, Steinmetz H, Freund H-J, Seitz RJ. Tactile exploration
of shape after subcortical ischemic infarction studied with
positron emission tomography. Brain. 1994;117:593-605.
52. Seitz RJ, Huang Y, Knorr U, Tellmann L, Herzog H, Freund H-J. Large-scale plasticity of the motor cortex. Neuroreport. 1995;6:742-744. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. E. Brown, K. Aminoltejari, H. Erb, I. R. Winship, and T. H. Murphy In Vivo Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging in Adult Mice Reveals That Somatosensory Maps Lost to Stroke Are Replaced over Weeks by New Structural and Functional Circuits with Prolonged Modes of Activation within Both the Peri-Infarct Zone and Distant Sites J. Neurosci., February 11, 2009; 29(6): 1719 - 1734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Winship and T. H. Murphy In Vivo Calcium Imaging Reveals Functional Rewiring of Single Somatosensory Neurons after Stroke J. Neurosci., June 25, 2008; 28(26): 6592 - 6606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Muller, K. M. Hanumanthiah, K. Diederich, S. Schwab, W.-R. Schabitz, and C. Sommer Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor But Not Forced Arm Use Improves Long-Term Outcome After Photothrombotic Stroke and Transiently Upregulates Binding Densities of Excitatory Glutamate Receptors in the Rat Brain Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 1012 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Epsztein, Y. Ben-Ari, A. Represa, and V. Crepel Late-Onset Epileptogenesis and Seizure Genesis: Lessons From Models of Cerebral Ischemia Neuroscientist, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 78 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Desmurget, F. Bonnetblanc, and H. Duffau Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity Brain, April 1, 2007; 130(4): 898 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dancause Vicarious Function of Remote Cortex following Stroke: Recent Evidence from Human and Animal Studies Neuroscientist, December 1, 2006; 12(6): 489 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N S Ward Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2005; 81(958): 510 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Biernaskie, G. Chernenko, and D. Corbett Efficacy of Rehabilitative Experience Declines with Time after Focal Ischemic Brain Injury J. Neurosci., February 4, 2004; 24(5): 1245 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kobayashi, S. Hutchinson, H. Theoret, G. Schlaug, and A. Pascual-Leone Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements Neurology, January 13, 2004; 62(1): 91 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rema and F. F. Ebner Lesions of Mature Barrel Field Cortex Interfere with Sensory Processing and Plasticity in Connected Areas of the Contralateral Hemisphere J. Neurosci., November 12, 2003; 23(32): 10378 - 10387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Ward, M. M. Brown, A. J. Thompson, and R. S. J. Frackowiak Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study Brain, November 1, 2003; 126(11): 2476 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Butefisch, J. Netz, M. Wessling, R. J. Seitz, and V. Homberg Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke Brain, February 1, 2003; 126(2): 470 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-F. Chang, S.-Z. Lin, Y.-H. Chiang, M. Morales, J. Chou, P. Lein, H.-L. Chen, B. J. Hoffer, and Y. Wang Intravenous Administration of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-7 After Ischemia Improves Motor Function in Stroke Rats Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 558 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Werhahn, J. Mortensen, A. Kaelin-Lang, B. Boroojerdi, and L. G. Cohen Cortical excitability changes induced by deafferentation of the contralateral hemisphere Brain, June 1, 2002; 125(6): 1402 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gold and M. Lauritzen Neuronal deactivation explains decreased cerebellar blood flow in response to focal cerebral ischemia or suppressed neocortical function PNAS, May 28, 2002; 99(11): 7699 - 7704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. TEI Right ipsilateral hypersensation in a case of anosognosia for hemiplegia and personal neglect with the patient's subjective experience J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2000; 69(2): 274 - 275. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hagemann, C. Redecker, and O. W. Witte Intact Functional Inhibition in the Surround of Experimentally Induced Focal Cortical Dysplasias in Rats J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 600 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bolay, T. Dalkara, and J. H. Garcia Mechanisms of Motor Dysfunction After Transient MCA Occlusion: Persistent Transmission Failure in Cortical Synapses Is a Major Determinant • Editorial Comment Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1988 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Silvestrini, L. M. Cupini, F. Placidi, M. Diomedi, and G. Bernardi Bilateral Hemispheric Activation in the Early Recovery of Motor Function After Stroke Stroke, July 1, 1998; 29(7): 1305 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Bidmon, K. Kato, A. Schleicher, O. W. Witte, K. Zilles, and R. J. Traystman Transient Increase of Manganese–Superoxide Dismutase in Remote Brain Areas After Focal Photothrombotic Cortical Lesion • Editorial Comment Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 203 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |