| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1996;27:1187-1191.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Hoag Memorial Hospital, Newport Beach (M.B.-Z., D.A., M.D., G.S.), and Long Beach Memorial Hospital (W.G.B.) (Calif).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods A retrospective review was undertaken of 50 consecutive MRI studies ordered for suspected cerebrovascular accident. All studies included FLAIR and rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) T2-weighted spin-echo sequences. The two sequences were compared independently by four observers at two different institutions. Detectability of lesions and image quality were scored.
Results Overall, FLAIR sequences proved superior in 10 patients, detecting acute cortical infarcts missed with RARE spin-echo technique in five patients. In five additional patients, improved characterization of chronic infarction and improved detection of microangiopathic deep hemispheric changes were observed. One brain stem infarct was missed with the FLAIR sequence.
Conclusions FLAIR offers advantages in detection of acute infarcts affecting the cortical ribbon, is a useful, rapid adjunct to conventional T2-weighted spin-echo sequences, and has the potential to replace these in the future.
Key Words: cerebral infarction cerebral ischemia diagnostic imaging magnetic resonance imaging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FLAIR and its variations10 11 12 13 are MRI sequences that produce both a strongly T2-weighted image and suppressed CSF signal. To accomplish these twin goals, a conventional SE sequence is prefaced by a 180° inversion pulse. A relatively long TI is used to allow the longitudinal magnetization of CSF to return to the null point before SE imaging. Thus, the CSF signal is completely suppressed for cortical or periventricular areas, and lesions with typical T2 prolongation in the brain that are adjacent to spinal fluid become much more conspicuous compared with conventional T2 imaging.
The concept of long TI, CSF-nulled FLAIR relies on the known lengthy T1 magnetization recovery for CSF. With TRs of 10 or more seconds, such FLAIR images have been burdened by long scan times and poor anatomic detail. By coupling the concept of a 180° inversion pulse and long TI with a RARE SE readout module, the FLAIR imaging process can be accelerated into a time frame more amenable to routine clinical whole brain imaging.
The purpose of this report was to evaluate the accelerated FLAIR technique in patients with cerebral infarction. Two variations resulted from the implementation of the technique on two different MR systems at our site. The purpose of the study was not to compare implementations but rather to compare the FLAIR technique with more conventional T2-weighted images for the assessment of cerebral infarction.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initially, the FLAIR acquisitions were obtained on a conventional Siemens 1.5-T VISION system (Iselin) with a standard circularly polarized head coil. The following parameters were used: TR=8000 ms, TI=2400 ms, ETL=7 with a 15-ms interecho delay, and nominal TE=105 ms. A 5-mm slice thickness was used. The matrix of 182x256 provided pixel measurements of 1x0.8 mm given the 183x210-mm field of view. Study time for this FLAIR was 3 minutes, 28 seconds. Toward the end of the study, our General Electric Signa 1.5-T system became capable of acquiring fast FLAIR images.13 The parameters on this instrument varied somewhat as follows: TR=11 000 ms, TI=2600 ms, ETL=7 with a 15-ms interecho delay, and nominal TE=146 ms. Slice thickness of 5 mm and matrix of 192x256 provided pixel measurements of 1x0.86 mm given the 220x220-mm field of view. Study time for this version of FLAIR was 6 minutes, 5 seconds. Our RARE sequences used the following parameters. For the Siemens VISION, the turbo SE protocol contained the following: TR=3500 ms, TE=22 and 90 ms, ETL=5, slice=5 mm, and matrix=192x256 over a 183x210-mm field of view. Flow compensation was applied along the read (anteroposterior) direction. For the General Electric Signa, the fast SE sequence was used, with TR=3500 ms, TE=22 and 90 ms, ETL=5, slice=5 mm, and matrix=192x256 over a 183x210-mm field of view. Flow compensation was applied along the read (anteroposterior) direction. The FLAIR and T2 protocols were acquired axially with phase encoding directed from right to left.
The readers evaluated the images in the following fashion. First, the particular scan being evaluated (FLAIR or RARE SE) was judged as normal or abnormal. If abnormal, the lesions were relegated to either the category of nonspecific patchy white matter lesions or focal, discrete infarcts including at least a small portion of the cortex. The readers were also asked to judge the conspicuity of any lesion(s) on a scale of 1 to 4 (equivocal, subtle, definite, "can't be missed"). The degree of artifact on the images was scored by the readers on a scale of 0 to 3 (none, mild, moderate, severe). Finally, overall diagnostic quality of the sequences was evaluated on a scale of 1 to 3 (poor, acceptable, excellent).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Two infarcts were missed by FLAIR but shown on the RARE SE images. Both were in the brain stem. A right pontine lesion was missed on the FLAIR sequence (Fig 5
). A small (8-mm) left ventral medullary infarct was missed by two observers, in retrospect because of considerable CSF pulsation artifact present at the level of the foramen magnum (Fig 6
). An acute basal ganglial hemorrhage was readily identified as such on both FLAIR and RARE SE sequences (Fig 7
).
|
|
|
Conspicuity of lesions was judged better on the FLAIR sequences; an average score of 4 for FLAIR imaging versus 3 for the fast SE images was found. The degree of artifact was slightly greater on FLAIR images, but overall image quality was scored as essentially equivalent.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FLAIR also improved characterization of infarcts as chronic, particularly those that exhibit cystic encephalomalacia. Because the bulk water in such chronically infarcted regions has essentially the same makeup as CSF, its signal is nulled as well. It can thus be easily distinguished from solid tissue with increased water content (as seen in more acute infarction).
Given the relatively long TE of the FLAIR sequence, it is not surprising that a hemorrhagic lesion was readily detected (as it is with fast SE sequences) and distinguished from ischemic insult (Fig 7
). The long TE allows for considerable dephasing of spins due to the effects of deoxyhemoglobin in acute hemorrhagic foci and hemosiderin in old hemorrhagic foci. However, such a focus of low intensity from blood by-products could simulate a focus of CSF were it not for the surrounding edema and mass effect.
The failure of FLAIR to depict the midpontine infarct in our series was surprising, particularly in view of the touted advantages of FLAIR for white matter lesions.10 14 15 This case points to one potential weakness of this sequence; namely, it is a single-echo sequence: only one sampling of signal intensity is obtained. In a fortuitous instance, a lesion with a very long T1 (but not quite as long as CSF) and a long T2 can potentially find itself at the "crossover point" with normal tissue on a single-echo sampling. Thus, a dual-echo FLAIR sequence might offer a potential solution to this problem. Also, our initial implementation of the FLAIR sequence lacked gradient moment nulling. This accentuated spinal fluid pulsation artifacts, particularly at the base of the brain, leading to another "miss" when a medullary lesion was in the midst of ghost pulsated artifacts (Fig 6
). Improved sequence design to provide dual-echo capability and "flow compensation" has been undertaken.
In summary, our initial experience suggests that FLAIR is a useful adjunct to more conventional T2-weighted SE evaluation of the brain, particularly in the setting of cerebral infarction. The combination of T1-weighted sagittal, RARE axial, and FLAIR axial sequences takes less than 10 minutes. Indeed, with sequence improvements, the FLAIR sequence may replace conventional dual-echo T2-weighted SE imaging for routine brain screening with MRI.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 23, 1996; revision received February 27, 1996; accepted March 18, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Truwit CL, Barkovich AJ, Gean-Marton A, Hibri N, Norman D. Loss of insular ribbon: another early CT sign of acute middle cerebral artery infarction. Radiology. 1990;176:801-806.
3.
Inoue Y, Takemoto K, Miyamoto T, Yoshikawa N, Taniguchi S, Saiwai S, Nishimura Y, Komatsu T. Sequential computed tomography scans in acute cerebral infarction. Radiology. 1980;135:655-662.
4. Brant-Zawadzki M, Pereira B, Weinstein P, Moore S, Kucharczyk W, Berry I, McNamara M, Derugin N. MR imaging of acute experimental ischemia in cats. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986;7:7-11.[Abstract]
5. Kucharczyk J, Mintorovitch J, Asgari HS, Moseley M. Diffusion/perfusion MR imaging of acute cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med. 1991;19:311-315.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Yuh WT, Crain MR, Loes DJ, Greene GM, Ryals TJ, Sato Y. MR imaging of cerebral ischemia: findings in the first 24 hours. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:621-629.[Abstract]
7. Bryan RN, Levy LM, Whitlow WD, Killian JM, Preziosi TJ, Rosario JA. Diagnosis of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of CT and MRI imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:611-620.[Abstract]
8.
Mohr JP, Biller J, Hilal SK, Yuh WT, Tatemichi TK, Hedges S, Tali E, Nguyen H, Mun I, Adams HP Jr. Magnetic resonance versus computed tomographic imaging in acute stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:807-812.
9. Alberts MJ, Faulstich ME, Gray L. Stroke with negative brain magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 1992;23:663-667.[Abstract]
10. Hajnal JV, De Coene B, Lewis PD, Baudouin CJ, Cowan FM, Pennock JM, Young IR, Bydder GM. High signal regions in normal white matter shown by heavily T2-weighted CSF nulled IR sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16:506-513.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. De Coene B, Hajnal JV, Gatehouse P, Longmore DB, White SJ, Oatridge A, Pennock JM, Young IR, Bydder GM. MR of the brain using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13:1555-1564.[Abstract]
12. White SJ, Hajnal JV, Young IA, Bydder GM. Use of fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery pulse sequences for imaging the spinal cord. Magn Reson Med. 1992;28:153-162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Rydberg JN, Hammond CA, Grimm RC, Erickson BJ, Jack CR Jr, Huston J III, Riederer SJ. Initial clinical experience in MR imaging of the brain with a fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery pulse sequence. Radiology. 1994;193:173-180.
14. Hajnal JV, De Coene B, Cowan FM. Application of prolonged inversion and echo time inversion recovery (PIETIR) pulse sequences to diagnosis of disease of the brain. In: Book of Abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 1992:1007. Abstract.
15. den Boer JA. Salverda P, Peters TR, Prevo RL. Multislice turbo-FLAIR in brain studies of multiple sclerosis. In: Book of Abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 1993:328. Abstract.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, J. Ruter, A. Mandler, and M. Himmelbach The Anatomy of Object Recognition--Visual Form Agnosia Caused by Medial Occipitotemporal Stroke J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 5854 - 5862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Siemonsen, K. Mouridsen, B. Holst, T. Ries, J. Finsterbusch, G. Thomalla, L. Ostergaard, and J. Fiehler Quantitative T2 Values Predict Time From Symptom Onset in Acute Stroke Patients Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1612 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Gaudinski, E. C. Henning, A. Miracle, M. Luby, S. Warach, and L. L. Latour Establishing Final Infarct Volume: Stroke Lesion Evolution Past 30 Days Is Insignificant Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): 2765 - 2768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cianfoni, M.G.M. Martin, J. Du, J.R. Hesselink, S.G. Imbesi, W.G. Bradley, and G.M. Bydder Artifact simulating subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage on single-shot, fast spin-echo fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images caused by head movement: A trap for the unwary. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 843 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fenchel, A. M. Scheule, N. I. Stauder, U. Kramer, K. Tomaschko, T. Nagele, C. Bretschneider, H.-P. Schlemmer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller Atherosclerotic Disease: Whole-Body Cardiovascular Imaging with MR System with 32 Receiver Channels and Total-Body Surface Coil Technology--Initial Clinical Results Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 280 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, R. Zopf, L. Johannsen, M. F. Berger, T. Nagele, and U. Klose Normalized perfusion MRI to identify common areas of dysfunction: patients with basal ganglia neglect Brain, October 1, 2005; 128(10): 2462 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, B. Baier, and T. Nagele Awareness of the Functioning of One's Own Limbs Mediated by the Insular Cortex? J. Neurosci., August 3, 2005; 25(31): 7134 - 7138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, L. Johannsen, D. Broetz, and W. Kuker Posterior thalamic hemorrhage induces "pusher syndrome" Neurology, March 22, 2005; 64(6): 1014 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, M. Fruhmann Berger, W. Kuker, and C. Rorden The Anatomy of Spatial Neglect based on Voxelwise Statistical Analysis: A Study of 140 Patients Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2004; 14(10): 1164 - 1172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ercan, S. Gultekin, H. Celik, T. E. Tali, Y. A. Oner, and G. Erbas Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Imaging of Intracranial Metastases AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 761 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, M. Fruhmann Berger, R. Zopf, and W. Kuker Using SPM normalization for lesion analysis in spatial neglect Brain, April 1, 2004; 127(4): E10 - E10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Saleh, F Wenserski, M Cohnen, G Furst, E Godehardt, and U Modder Exclusion of brain lesions: is MR contrast medium required after a negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence? Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 77(915): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Singh, N. E. Leeds, and L. E. Ginsberg MR Imaging of Leptomeningeal Metastases: Comparison of Three Sequences AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2002; 23(5): 817 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Wu, D. M. Yousem, H.-W. Chung, W.-Y. Guo, C.-Y. Chang, and C.-Y. Chen Influence of Imaging Parameters on High-Intensity Cerebrospinal Fluid Artifacts in Fast-FLAIR MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2002; 23(3): 393 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Herlihy, J. V. Hajnal, W. L. Curati, N. Virji, A. Oatridge, B. K. Puri, and G. M. Bydder Reduction of CSF and Blood Flow Artifacts on FLAIR Images of the Brain with k-Space Reordered by Inversion Time at each Slice Position (KRISP) AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2001; 22(5): 896 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bakshi, S. Ariyaratana, R. H. B. Benedict, and L. Jacobs Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Cortical and Juxtacortical Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Arch Neurol, May 1, 2001; 58(5): 742 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Rowley The Four Ps of Acute Stroke Imaging: Parenchyma, Pipes, Perfusion, and Penumbra AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2001; 22(4): 599 - 601. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Filippi, A. M. Ulug, D. Lin, L. A. Heier, and R. D. Zimmerman Hyperintense Signal Abnormality in Subarachnoid Spaces and Basal Cisterns on MR Images of Children Anesthetized with Propofol: New Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery Finding AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 394 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Taoka, W. T. C. Yuh, M. L. White, J. P. Quets, J. E. Maley, and T. Ueda Sulcal Hyperintensity on Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Images in Patients Without Apparent Cerebrospinal Fluid Abnormality Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 519 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Singh, J. M. Agris, N. E. Leeds, and L. E. Ginsberg Intracranial Leptomeningeal Metastases: Comparison of Depiction at FLAIR and Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 50 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Min, K. K. Park, Y. S. Kim, H. C. Park, J. Y. Kim, S. P. Park, and C. K. Suh Atherothrombotic Middle Cerebral Artery Territory Infarction : Topographic Diversity With Common Occurrence of Concomitant Small Cortical and Subcortical Infarcts Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31(9): 2055 - 2061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kamran, V. Bates, R. Bakshi, P. Wright, W. Kinkel, and R. Miletich Significance of hyperintense vessels on FLAIR MRI in acute stroke Neurology, July 25, 2000; 55(2): 265 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tanaka, T. Abe, K. Kojima, H. Nishimura, and N. Hayabuchi Applicability and Advantages of Flow artifact-insensitive Fluid-attenuated Inversion-recovery MR Sequences for Imaging the Posterior Fossa AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2000; 21(6): 1095 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mukherjee, M. M. Bahn, R. C. McKinstry, J. S. Shimony, T. S. Cull, E. Akbudak, A. Z. Snyder, and T. E. Conturo Differences between Gray Matter and White Matter Water Diffusion in Stroke: Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging in 12 Patients Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 211 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Ricci, J. H. Burdette, A. D. Elster, and D. M. Reboussin A Comparison of Fast Spin-Echo, Fluid-Attenuated Inversion-Recovery, and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in the First 10 Days after Cerebral Infarction AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1535 - 1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Sunshine, R. W. Tarr, C. F. Lanzieri, D. M. D. Landis, W. R. Selman, and J. S. Lewin Hyperacute Stroke: Ultrafast MR Imaging to Triage Patients prior to Therapy Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 325 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bakshi, S. Kamran, P. R. Kinkel, V. E. Bates, L. L. Mechtler, V. Janardhan, S. L. Belani, and W. R. Kinkel Fluid-Attenuated Inversion-Recovery MR Imaging in Acute and Subacute Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhage AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 629 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K.J. van Everdingen, J. van der Grond, L.J. Kappelle, L.M.P. Ramos, and W.P.T.M. Mali Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1783 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |