(Stroke. 1996;27:1226-1230.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle; and the Department of Neurology, University of Bern (Switzerland) (M.S.).
Correspondence to David W. Newell, MD, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 359766, Seattle, WA 98104.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Ten patients with ICA dissection secondary to trauma and seven with spontaneous ICA dissection were diagnosed by carotid angiography and studied by TCD from the time of diagnosis through initiation of therapy. Emboli monitoring was performed in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) ipsilateral to the dissection at the initial evaluation and intermittently thereafter to ensure that the emboli stopped with treatment.
Results Emboli were detected in the MCA distal to the dissection in 10 of 17 patients (59%). Patients with microemboli detected by TCD presented with a stroke (70%) much more frequently than those without emboli (14%) (P=.0498). The presence of a pseudoaneurysm did not increase the risk of either microemboli or stroke.
Conclusions We have demonstrated a high incidence of intracranial microemboli in the MCA distal to carotid dissections and a significant correlation between the presence of emboli and stroke. TCD can therefore be used as an adjunctive tool to manage patients with suspected carotid dissection and may prove useful in evaluating the efficacy of treatment in reducing microemboli and subsequent stroke.
Key Words: anticoagulation dissection stroke ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carotid angiography is the diagnostic procedure of choice to establish the diagnosis, although MRI, MR angiography, and ultrasound are increasingly used.8 9 10 None of these studies, however, can identify those patients at risk for an ischemic event. In this report we describe 17 patients in whom TCD examination and emboli monitoring were used to aid in the evaluation of carotid dissection. The potential role of emboli monitoring in guiding treatment is discussed.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients underwent aortic arch and three- or four-vessel cerebral angiography on average 3.5 days after presentation of the dissection. The radiological reports as well as the actual films were analyzed. TCD examinations were performed by standard techniques11 12 with the use of a 2-MHz Doppler instrument (Transpect Medasonics) (Figure
). Systolic, diastolic, and mean BFVs were measured in each vessel. PI was calculated by the following formula: PI=(Systolic BFV-Diastolic BFV)/Mean BFV. Emboli monitoring with TCD was performed for 20 to 30 minutes in each MCA ipsilateral to the dissection.13 14 High-intensity transient signals were counted on-line by a technician and identified by their characteristic high-frequency chirping sound on the audio output of the TCD equipment and by their specific features on spectral analysis. The embolic pattern is characterized by a very brief (<0.1 second) high-intensity signal occurring randomly through the cardiac cycle. These signals are easily distinguished from noise artifacts that are bidirectional, originate at the baseline, are coincident with movement of the probe, and have a noisy quality on the audio output.14 15 16 These signals are subsequently referred to as emboli. The criteria for embolic signals as well as the equipment used remained consistent throughout the study period. Embolic frequency was calculated as the number of emboli per hour. TCD studies were performed in a nonblinded fashion at the time of diagnosis and at regular intervals (1 to 2 days) thereafter with the initiation of therapy. The examinations were discontinued once no emboli were detectable and the patient's clinical status was stable.
|
The patients were treated with either antiplatelet therapy with ASA or anticoagulation with heparin followed by 3 to 6 months of warfarin. The choice of treatment depended on the clinician's preference, the status of the patient, and whether there were any contraindications to full anticoagulation, such as associated trauma.
| Illustrative Cases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Case 2: Spontaneous Dissection
A previously healthy 37-year-old woman underwent cesarean section for delivery of her full-term infant and 10 days later underwent emergency dilatation and curettage for removal of the retained placenta. The following day she developed a right-sided hemiparesis. A CT scan revealed multiple cortical and subcortical hypodensities on the left side. Laboratory investigations for vasculitis and autoimmune disorders were negative, as was an echocardiogram. Carotid duplex revealed high-grade (80% to 99%) left ICA stenosis. She was begun on low-dose heparin, and TCD performed the next day revealed normal intracranial velocities. TCD with emboli monitoring revealed 60 emboli per hour in the left MCA. A heparin infusion was begun, and therapeutic levels were maintained. A carotid angiogram revealed fibromuscular dysplasia of the right ICA and a pseudoaneurysm of the left ICA with a 20% narrowing just proximal to it. The patient remained stable neurologically, and TCD performed 5 days later, with full warfarin anticoagulation, revealed no emboli. She was treated with warfarin for 8 months and then converted to ASA; she had significant recovery of her hemiparesis (Figure
).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The time from the traumatic event until presentation of the dissection ranged from 0 to 6 days, with an average of 2.1 days. In this group, 5 of 10 patients (50%) presented with a stroke and 2 of 10 (20%) presented with a transient neurological deficit (TIA). Two patients (20%) developed oculosympathetic palsy secondary to the dissection, and in 1 patient the dissection was an incidental finding on an angiogram performed after aneurysm clipping. In the spontaneous group, 2 of 7 patients (29%) presented with TIAs and another 3 of 7 (43%) with stroke. One patient presented with an oculosympathetic palsy, and a single patient presented with a pharyngeal mass without other symptoms. Fifty-seven percent of these patients complained of headaches.
Angiography revealed evidence of dissection in the right ICA in 7 patients, the left ICA in 9 patients, and both ICAs in 1 patient, for a total of 18 arteries. Stenosis was found in 11 of 18 vessels (61%) and occlusion in 5 of 18 vessels (28%); 2 of 18 arteries (11%) had no evidence of narrowing but contained a pseudoaneurysm. Overall, 9 of 18 dissected arteries (50%) contained a pseudoaneurysm: 5 of 10 in the traumatic group and 4 of 8 in the spontaneous group. A single patient in the traumatic group developed a carotid-cavernous fistula secondary to the dissection. Intracranial branch occlusions were noted distal to the dissection in 4 cases. Evidence of fibromuscular dysplasia was found in the contralateral carotid artery in 2 of 17 patients (12%): 1 in the traumatic and 1 in the spontaneous group (Table 1
).
CT revealed strokes in 9 of 17 patients (53%); these were small infarcts secondary to emboli in 6 of 17 patients (35%) and infarcts secondary to major branch occlusion in 3 of 17 patients (18%). Two patients had evidence only of traumatic brain injury, and 6 of 17 (35%) had normal brain parenchyma by CT scan.
Doppler ultrasound evaluation correctly identified ICA stenosis in 9 of 18 vessels (50%) and occlusion in 5 of 18 vessels (28%). By TCD, the mean PI in the MCA ipsilateral to the dissection was 0.66 compared with 0.91 in the contralateral MCA. The mean MCA velocity was 82 cm/s distal to the injured carotid artery and 83 cm/s in the contralateral MCA. This lowered PI most likely reflects lowered resistance in the vessels distal to the dissection, a change that may not be reflected in the velocity. Evidence of collateral circulation through the circle of Willis was identified in 10 of 17 patients (59%) and was absent in the remaining 7.
Emboli monitoring performed in the MCA distal to the carotid injury revealed emboli in 10 of 18 vessels (56%), ranging from 2 to 60 signals per hour. In the traumatic group, 4 of 10 patients (40%) had emboli on the initial TCD examination, and 2 of 10 (20%) had emboli detected on subsequent monitoring 4 and 5 days later. In the spontaneous group, all 4 of 7 patients (57%) with emboli had them on the first TCD examination. Of the 9 dissected arteries containing a pseudoaneurysm, 5 (56%) had evidence of emboli in the ipsilateral MCA; of the 8 arteries without an aneurysm seen on angiogram, 5 (63%) had emboli documented in the MCA. There was no statistical correlation by
2 analysis between the presence of a pseudoaneurysm and either evidence of emboli by TCD examination or stroke. (Table 2
). There was also no correlation by
2 analysis between the presence of emboli and low PI or low velocity in the ipsilateral MCA.
|
Seven of the 10 patients (70%) with TCD documentation of emboli presented with a stroke, whereas only 1 of 7 patients (14%) without emboli did so. By Fisher's exact test this result was statistically significant, with 95% confidence (P=.0364 [one-sided] and P=.0498 [two-sided]).
A total of 11 of 17 patients (65%) were treated initially with ASA, and 7 of these had embolic phenomena on TCD 1 to 3 days after initiation of therapy. Three patients taking ASA were ultimately changed to heparin because of persistent emboli; of these, 2 were asymptomatic and the third suffered a stroke on ASA. Nine of 17 patients (53%) received heparin followed by warfarin for 3 to 6 months as the definitive treatment. In both ASA and heparin/warfarin treatment groups, emboli monitoring was performed serially until no embolic events were detectable and the patient's clinical status was stable.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diagnosis of carotid dissection has typically been made by angiography.4 5 7 Common angiographic findings include luminal stenosis, occlusion, pseudoaneurysm, intimal flap, and distal branch occlusion.4 5 More recently, MRI and MR angiography have been used to accurately diagnose carotid dissection.4 10 22 Duplex sonography can identify carotid dissection when associated stenosis is greater than 50%.9 None of these modalities, however, is able to identify patients at risk for cerebral ischemia.
In a prior report in which TCD examination was used, 6 patients with ICA dissection revealed abnormalities in the intracranial circulation, including decreased PI and decreased BFV ipsilateral to the dissection.9 Achtereekte et al23 also described a patient in whom the diagnosis of dissection was made initially by TCD. We are not aware, however, of any reported uses of TCD for emboli monitoring in carotid dissection in the literature.
In the 17 cases of carotid dissection in this report, TCD was performed to assess the hemodynamics of the intracranial circulation and also to detect embolization from the dissected vessel. The traumatic dissections in our series, like those in the literature, had a high incidence of cerebral ischemia (70%), most commonly stroke. Unlike other series, however, the spontaneous dissections also presented most commonly with ischemia (86%), although the high incidence may reflect the small sample size. The angiographic findings in the present series, including the incidence of pseudoaneurysms, are similar to those described in previous reports.1 2 4
TCD identified hemodynamic changes in the cerebral circulation distal to the dissection as well as the collateral flow pattern to the affected hemisphere. The differences in MCA velocities and PI reflect the varied compensatory responses in the circulation, which depend on change in perfusion pressure above the lesion. These hemodynamic indices are potentially useful in detection of hemodynamic insufficiency secondary to dissection, a rare situation in which surgical therapy (extracranial-intracranial bypass or reconstruction of the artery) may be used. TCD may also be used to follow patients noninvasively to assess resolution of the dissection.
The most valuable aspect of the TCD examination in the present series of patients was the ability to detect and follow microemboli in the MCA distal to a carotid dissection. In normal control subjects, TCD does not detect embolic phenomena.24 After carotid dissection, we found a high incidence of microemboli (59%). We typically monitored patients for 20 to 30 minutes for microemboli. With longer monitoring times, it is possible that more positive studies would have been found; in the future, automated emboli detection systems may provide more accurate data. The presence of emboli by TCD is not only a useful diagnostic sign of carotid dissection but appears to correlate with patients at high risk for stroke and may prove useful in guiding therapy. The mechanism of cerebral ischemia in carotid dissection has been hypothesized to be most frequently embolic in nature.1 18 Although the presence of distal branch occlusion on angiography is diagnostic, this finding was present in only 4 of 17 patients. There is a significant correlation between the presence of emboli on TCD and stroke: 70% of patients with TCD evidence of emboli presented with stroke as opposed to 14% of those without. This finding was statistically significant despite the small size, indicating a strong correlation between the presence of microemboli and stroke in these patients.
The definitive therapy for spontaneous or traumatic arterial dissection is not clear. The most common treatment has been heparinization followed by oral anticoagulation with warfarin for 3 to 6 months.4 18 Other authors have used antiplatelet therapy, especially in traumatic cases in which there may be a contraindication to anticoagulation.1 Surgical therapy, including endarterectomy, resection of the injured segment, carotid ligation, and extracranial-intracranial bypass, has been used for patients with hemodynamic insufficiency or persistent ischemia secondary to emboli.1 25 26 Because of the increased risk of stroke in patients with TCD microemboli, we advocate anticoagulation with heparin, followed by warfarin, in these patients unless there is a contraindication.
Emboli monitoring was also performed after initiation of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy in all patients. Although daily TCD examinations were performed until disappearance of embolic signals was noted, continuous bedside monitoring was not available. From this small series, it appears that ASA is not always adequate therapy to prevent embolization, emphasizing the importance of heparin/warfarin anticoagulation in these patients. In the future, continuous monitoring could potentially be used to adjust the level of anticoagulation until the embolic signals resolved. The optimal duration of treatment is not certain; however, emboli monitoring after cessation of therapy could then be used to ensure that treatment was successful. Also of interest was the lack of correlation between the presence of a pseudoaneurysm and emboli on TCD or stroke. The absence of a pseudoaneurysm may not be a valid reason to omit anticoagulation therapy in the acute setting. Pseudoaneurysms are still the most likely nidus for emboli that cause delayed cerebral ischemia.1 27 Adequate follow-up was not available in this study to confirm this. The absence of emboli by TCD does not eliminate the risk of stroke, particularly since the limited examination time may not have been sufficient to detect all microemboli. This source of error may be reduced by multiple, serial exams or continuous monitoring. In a larger series, it may be possible to evaluate this more fully.
In conclusion, although carotid dissection (especially spontaneous) may carry a benign prognosis, the risk of stroke is still significant. TCD is a new modality that can be used as an adjunctive tool in cases of suspected carotid dissection. The value of TCD to monitor therapy requires further investigation. In this initial series, the presence of microemboli by TCD may be a marker for patients at high risk for stroke; given the retrospective nature of this series, it is not possible to determine the true predictive value of this finding. Because our patients were treated with either antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy, it is unclear what the natural history would have been. One patient treated with ASA had persistent emboli and a subsequent stroke; the emboli resolved with heparin anticoagulation. Thus, given the high incidence of embolic phenomena on TCD, we believe that carotid dissection should be treated aggressively with anticoagulation and that efficacy of treatment should be followed with TCD monitoring. In the future, it may be possible to stratify patients without any embolic signals into a lower risk group that may be treated with ASA. According to this strategy, it may be possible to reduce the incidence of stroke secondary to carotid dissection by early identification of dissections and institution of early treatment, particularly in high-risk patients.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 1, 1995; revision received March 11, 1996; accepted April 1, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Mokri B, Piepgras DG, Houser OW. Traumatic dissections of the extracranial internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg. 1988;68:189-197.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mokri B, Schievink WI, Olsen K, Piepgras DG. Spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid artery: presentation with lower cranial nerve palsies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:431-435.
4. Anson J, Crowell RM. Cervicocranial arterial dissection. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:89-96.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Fisher CM, Ojemann RG, Roberson GH. Spontaneous dissection of cervico-cerebral arteries. Can J Neurol Sci. 1978;5:9-19.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Watridge CB, Muhlbauer MS, Lowery RD. Traumatic carotid artery dissection: diagnosis and treatment. J Neurosurg. 1989;71:854-857.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Davis JM, Zimmerman RA. Injury of the carotid and vertebral arteries. Neuroradiology. 1983;25:55-69.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Levy C, Laissy JP, Raveau V, Amarenco P, Servois V, Bousser MG, Tubiana JM. Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography. Radiology. 1994;190:97-103.
9.
Sturzenegger M. Ultrasound findings in spontaneous carotid artery dissection. Arch Neurol. 1991;48:1057-1063.
10. Zuber M, Meary E, Neder JF, Mas JL. Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic CT scan in cervical artery dissection. Stroke. 1994;25:576-581.[Abstract]
11. Aaslid R. Developments of principles of transcranial Doppler. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R, eds. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:1-8.
12. Fujioka KA, Douville CM. Anatomy and freehand examination techniques. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R, eds. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:9-31.
13. Russell D. The detection of cerebral emboli using Doppler ultrasound. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R, eds. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:207-213.
14. Spencer M. Detection of cerebral arterial emboli. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R, eds. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:215-230.
15. Lash S, Newell DW, Mayberg MR, Spence A, Douville C, Byrd S, Winn HR. Artery-to-artery cerebral emboli detection with transcranial Doppler: analysis of eight cases. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1993;3:15-22.
16.
Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. Basic identification criteria for Doppler microembolic signals. Stroke. 1995;26:1123.
17. Yamada S, Kindt GW, Youmans JR. Carotid artery occlusion due to nonpenetrating injury. J Trauma. 1967;7:333-342.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Hart RG, Easton JD. Dissections of cervical and cerebral arteries. Neurol Clin North Am. 1983;1:255-282.
19. Sturzenegger M, Huber P. Cranial nerve palsies in spontaneous carotid artery dissection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56:1191-1199.
20.
Waespe W, Niesper J, Imhof HG, Valavanis A. Lower cranial nerve palsies due to internal carotid artery dissection. Stroke. 1988;19:1561-1564.
21.
Bogousslavsky J, Despland PA, Regli F. Spontaneous carotid dissection with acute stroke. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:137-140.
22. Sue DE, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Chance J. Dissection of cranial arteries in the neck: correlation of MRI and arteriography. Neuroradiology. 1992;34:273-278.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Achtereekte HAM, van der Kruijk RA, Hekster REM, Keunen RWM. Diagnosis of traumatic carotid artery dissection by transcranial Doppler ultrasound: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1994;42:240-244.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Tegeler CH, Hitchings LP, Eicke M, Leighton J, Fredericks RK, Downers TR, Stump DA, Burke GL. Microemboli detection in stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Tech. 1990;9:283-284. Abstract.
25. Sundt TM, Pearson BW, Piepgras DG, Houser OW, Mokri B. Surgical management of aneurysms of the distal extracranial internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg. 1986;64:169-182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Morgan MK, Sekhon LHS. Extracranial-intracranial saphenous vein bypass for carotid or vertebral artery dissections: a report of six cases. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:237-246.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Pozzati E, Giuliani G, Acciarri N, Nuzzo G. Long-term follow-up of occlusive cervical carotid dissection. Stroke. 1990;21:528-531.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. P. Edmundson, K. M. Hirpara, R. S. Ryan, T. O'Malley, and P. O'Grady Delayed presentation of carotid artery dissection following major orthopaedic trauma resulting in dense hemiparesis J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2009; 91-B(4): 536 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Menon, S Kerry, J W Norris, and H S Markus Treatment of cervical artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 79(10): 1122 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Engelter, T. Brandt, S. Debette, V. Caso, C. Lichy, A. Pezzini, S. Abboud, A. Bersano, R. Dittrich, C. Grond-Ginsbach, et al. Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection Stroke, September 1, 2007; 38(9): 2605 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Lee, S. W. Yong, O. Y. Bang, Y. S. Shin, B. M. Kim, and S. Y. Kim Comparison of Spontaneous Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection With Large Artery Disease Arch Neurol, December 1, 2006; 63(12): 1738 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. H. Lee, R. D. Brown Jr, J. N. Mandrekar, and B. Mokri Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: A population-based study Neurology, November 28, 2006; 67(10): 1809 - 1812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.Y. Ahn, I.B. Han, T.G. Kim, P.H. Yoon, Y.J. Lee, B.-H. Lee, S.H. Seo, D.I. Kim, C.K. Hong, and J.Y. Joo Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissections with Stent Placement or Stent-assisted Coiling AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1514 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tola, M. Yurdakul, and T. Cumhur B-Flow Imaging in Low Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Dissection J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2005; 24(11): 1497 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Norris Extracranial Arterial Dissection: Anticoagulation Is the Treatment of Choice: For Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 2041 - 2042. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Thanvi, S K Munshi, S L Dawson, and T G Robinson Carotid and vertebral artery dissection syndromes Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2005; 81(956): 383 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Neri, G. Sani, M. Massetti, G. Frati, D. Buklas, R. Tassi, M. Giubbolini, A. Benvenuti, and C. Sassi Residual dissection of the brachiocephalic arteries: Significance, management, and long-term outcome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2004; 128(2): 303 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Cohen, R. R. Leker, M. Gotkine, M. Gomori, and T. Ben-Hur Emergent Stenting to Treat Patients With Carotid Artery Dissection: Clinically and Radiologically Directed Therapeutic Decision Making Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34 (12): e254 - e257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Beletsky, Z. Nadareishvili, J. Lynch, A. Shuaib, A. Woolfenden, and J. W. Norris Cervical Arterial Dissection: Time for a Therapeutic Trial? Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2856 - 2860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Cohen, J. M. Gomori, and F. Umansky Endovascular Management of Spontaneous Bilateral Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Dissections AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2052 - 2056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arnold, K. Nedeltchev, M. Sturzenegger, G. Schroth, T. J. Loher, F. Stepper, L. Remonda, C. Bassetti, and H. P. Mattle Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Stroke Caused by Cervical Artery Dissection: Analysis of 9 Patients and Review of the Literature Arch Neurol, April 1, 2002; 59(4): 549 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. I. Schievink Spontaneous Dissection of the Carotid and Vertebral Arteries N. Engl. J. Med., March 22, 2001; 344(12): 898 - 906. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina, J. Alvarez-Sabin, W. Schonewille, J. Montaner, A. Rovira, S. Abilleira, and A. Codina Cerebral microembolism in acute spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection Neurology, December 12, 2000; 55(11): 1738 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Koennecke and S. Seyfert Mydriatic Pupil as the Presenting Sign of Common Carotid Artery Dissection Stroke, December 1, 1998; 29(12): 2653 - 2655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B Blunt and C. Galton Cervical carotid or vertebral artery dissection BMJ, January 25, 1997; 314(7076): 243 - 243. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |