| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1996;27:1578-1585.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Laboratory for Experimental Brain Research, Lund (Sweden) University, and Laboratory for Experimental Neurology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil (C.C.)
Correspondence to Dr Cicero Coimbra, Laboratory for Experimental Neurology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, R Botucatu 862, 04023-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Rats were subjected to 10 minutes of forebrain ischemia. Hypothermia (33°C) was induced at 2 hours of recovery and maintained for 7 hours. Dipyrone (100 mg·kg-1IP) was given every 3 hours from 14 to 72 hours of recovery. Temperature was measured every 6 hours for 60 days. Neuronal damage was assessed at 7 days and 2 months of recovery.
Results From 17 to 72 hours of recovery, a period of hyperthermia was observed, which dipyrone abolished but postischemic hypothermia treatment did not. Dipyrone treatment diminished neuronal damage by 43% at 7 days, and at 2 months of survival, a minor (16%) protection was seen. Postischemic hypothermia treatment alone delayed neuronal damage. In contrast, combined treatment of hypothermia followed by dipyrone markedly diminished neuronal damage by more than 50% at both 7 days and 2 months of recovery.
Conclusions Neuronal degeneration may be ongoing for months after a transient ischemic insult, and prolonged protective measures need to be instituted for long-lasting neuroprotective effects. Hyperthermia during recovery worsens ischemic damage, and processes associated with inflammation may contribute to the development of neuronal damage. An early and extended period of postischemic hypothermia provides a powerful and long-lasting protection if followed by treatment with anti-inflammatory/antipyretic drugs.
Key Words: temperature neuronal damage rats hypothermia anti-inflammatory agents
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intraischemic hyperthermia is known to aggravate neuronal damage.6 However, the effect of postischemic hyperthermia has not been addressed experimentally in much detail. This is of clinical relevance because several reports have indicated that fever worsens outcome after ischemia.7 We recently observed a sustained period of spontaneous hyperthermia from the end of the 1st day to the end of the 3rd day of recovery in our model of rat forebrain ischemia.8 Maintaining normothermic levels during this period by effective antipyretic therapy or cooling decreased neuronal loss observed at 7 days of recovery in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. This suggested that vulnerable neurons may succumb because of hyperthermic stress late during recovery.
In this study, we investigated whether postischemic hypothermia of moderate duration or antipyretic treatment provides a long-lasting (2 months) neuroprotective effect. Also, since the two treatments provide a substantial neuroprotection at 7 days of recovery and are instituted at different phases of recovery, we investigated the effect of sequential treatment with hypothermia followed by antipyresis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Postischemic Hypothermia
In all rats treated with hypothermia, anesthesia was induced again with 3.5% halothane in N2O/O2 (70:30) at 2 hours into recirculation and maintained at 1.0% halothane. Core temperature was reduced to 33.0°C within 15 to 25 minutes by spraying alcohol onto the chest and abdominal skin, which was thereafter placed in contact with a metallic surface. The 33.0±0.5°C range was maintained by keeping part of the ventral skin in contact with a metallic surface and part on a heating pad set at 33.0°C. Anesthesia was then discontinued, and the rats were allowed to rewarm spontaneously, reaching a core temperature of 38.0°C within 90 to 120 minutes.
With a heating pad, core temperature was maintained in the range of 37.5° to 38.5°C in the normothermia group from 2 to 9 hours of recovery with rats under halothane anesthesia. Ventilatory assistance was maintained for an additional 30 minutes after either hypothermic or normothermic treatment.
Postischemic Temperature Measurements
After ischemia, the rats were maintained at a 12-hour light/dark cycle with lights off from 6 PM to 6 AM. Temperature was measured with a digital thermometer (Ellab) at 1 AM, 7AM, 1 PM, and 7 PM from the first to the last day of recovery. The probe was lubricated with tap water and the sensor tip introduced at 10 cm from the anus 20 to 30 seconds before core temperature measurement was made and just before the intraperitoneal injections during dipyrone or saline treatment.
Histopathology
At either 7 days or 2 months of survival, the rats were anesthetized and perfusion fixed with 0.9% NaCl followed by phosphate-buffered 4.0% formaldehyde. The brains were allowed to fix in situ for 24 hours and then were removed, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Serial coronal sections at 8 mm were obtained and stained with celestine blue and acid fuchsin.10
Brain damage in the hippocampus was evaluated at a coronal level 3.8 to 4.0 mm caudal to bregma and quantified by visual counting of surviving intact (violet) cells at a magnification of x400. Each examined area of the CA1 region was 400 µm in length. The medial and middle CA1 region contained a mean value of 70 cells, and the medial part contained 75 cells. Each examined area of the CA1 region was 400 µm in length. The percentage of damaged neurons of the total neuronal population was calculated for lateral, medial, and middle CA1 hippocampal subsectors in each hemisphere, and a mean value was calculated. The mean damage of the three subsectors was also calculated. In rats perfused 2 months after ischemia, cortical thickness was measured from the external wall of the lateral ventricle to the cortical surface in the temporoparietal cortex above the entorhinal fissure at the same level as the evaluation of hippocampal damage. Similarly, the areas of the striatum and lateral ventricles were calculated at the level of 0.4 to 0.2 mm rostral from bregma by computerized image analysis with the Image program (Dr Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md) and a Macintosh Quadra 950 computer. The mean of the two hemispheric values is provided.
Experimental Groups
In this study, 104 rats were distributed into 13 experimental groups, as shown in Table 1.
Hypothermia (core temperature, 32.5° to 33.5°C) for 7 hours was initiated 2 hours after ischemia. The normothermia group was maintained at a core temperature of about 38.0°C, with a period of anesthesia similar to that of hypothermia-treated rats. Dipyrone-treated rats received 100 mg·kg-1 dipyrone (0.6 mL of 5% solution), and the saline (vehicle)-treated rats received the same volume of 0.9% NaCl. Treatment was administered intraperitoneally every 3 hours from 14 to 72 hours after ischemia. The rats were perfused at either 7 days or 2 months of recovery.
|
If not otherwise stated, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for the evaluation of differences among experimental groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Rats are active during the nighttime, so nocturnal core temperature could be affected by activity and food intake. Therefore, we compared the mean temperature at 1 PM in saline- and dipyrone-treated rats and in the combined hypothermia+saline- and hypothermia+dipyrone-treated rats (Fig 3
). A sustained elevation in temperature was seen in saline-treated and hypothermia+saline-treated rats immediately after the induced hypothermia period, extending in duration to 3 to 4 days after ischemia. This hyperthermic episode was obliterated in both the dipyrone- and hypothermia+dipyrone-treated groups, in which temperature decreased to approximately 38°C. The temperature during the subsequent 60 days did not differ among the experimental groups.
|
Neuronal Damage in the Hippocampus, Neocortex, and Striatum
The effects of the different treatments on neuronal damage in the lateral and medial CA1 subsectors of the hippocampus at 7 days and 2 months of survival are shown in Figs 4 and 5, respectively. At 7 days of recovery, dipyrone treatment alone decreased neuronal damage by 40% in the lateral CA1 region and by 26% in the medial CA1 region. This protection was abolished at 2 months of recovery (Fig 5
), when dipyrone only slightly protected the lateral (damage decreased by 19%, P<.05) but not the medial CA1 subsector compared with saline treatment. Similarly, at 7 days of recovery, hypothermia provided a robust protective effect, with 53% protection in the lateral CA1 region and 34% protection in the medial CA1 region. In contrast, at 2 months of recovery, hypothermia alone provided moderate protection to the lateral (damage decreased by 23%, P<.01) and medial (damage decreased by 22%, P<.05) CA1 subsectors compared with normothermia. The combined hypothermia+dipyrone treatment, on the other hand, was markedly protective at both 7 days and 2 months. At 7 days, 37% and 51% neuronal necrosis was observed in the lateral and medial CA1 regions, respectively. At 2 months of recovery, neuronal damage was depressed to 23% and 56%, respectively.
|
Neuronal necrosis in the CA1 sector of the hippocampus can be assessed with reasonable accuracy at 2 months of recovery because the neurons display a homogeneous band of cell bodies in the stratum pyramidale. It is not possible to assess cell loss in the striatum and cortex by cell counting because degenerated cells are absorbed by glial cells, and subsequently, the tissue collapses and shrinks, causing an underestimation of cell damage. We therefore measured the thickness of the temporal cortex, an area of cortex where damage is mainly found following this duration of ischemia.11 The cortex was significantly thinner in the saline-treated rats compared with both the hypothermia- and hypothermia+dipyrone-treated rats (Table 2
). Similarly, in the dorsolateral striatum, damage was reflected as a shrinkage of the caudate nucleus and enlargement of the ventricles (Fig 6
). Hypothermia and hypothermia+dipyrone significantly diminished ventricular enlargement, whereas hypothermia alone significantly prevented striatal shrinkage (Table 2
).
|
|
At 7 days of recovery, brains treated with saline, hypothermia, or dipyrone or the combined regimen displayed variable degrees of gliosis and multiple red condensed neurons surrounded by dark-staining microglial nuclei. At this time, the thicknesses of the strata oriens and radiatum were not markedly changed compared with normal brain. At 2 months of recovery, extensive gliosis, microdeposits of amorphous acidophilic material, and red-staining shrunken neurons were seen in brains not treated with the combination of hypothermia and dipyrone (Fig 7b and 7c
). Two types of red-staining cells could be identified. One was morphologically similar to that usually observed at 1 week of recovery and described above and was diffusely seen throughout the CA1 pyramidal layer (Fig 7b and 7c
). The other, stained dark red, showed aberrant, multiple shapes, occasionally suggestive of entangled filaments and sometimes surrounded by small, rounded fragments of the same color (Fig 7c
). The reason for the presence of light red residues of cell bodies and the appearance of an amorphous substance in the CA1 region (Fig 7b and 7c
) of untreated and partially treated rats at 2 months of survival is unknown. The patchy aggregation of polymorphous dark red neuronal residues observed in the medial CA1 subsector of the hippocampus of some rats subjected to hypothermic treatment followed by spontaneous hyperthermia may represent calcified cells similar to those reported earlier.12
|
At 2 months of recovery, the degeneration of neurons had affected the dendritic processes, causing a collapse of the strata oriens and radiatum of the CA1 region (Fig 8b and 8c
). In rats treated with hypothermia, a treatment in which moderate protection was attained (Fig 5
), the shrinkage of the CA1 region was less conspicuous (Fig 8d
).
|
In contrast, in rats subjected to combined hypothermia+dipyrone treatment, the general appearance of the CA1 region (Figs 7d and 8e![]()
) could not be distinguished from that of sham-operated rats (Figs 7a and 8a![]()
), apart from a lower density of cells per unit area. A major finding is the lack of extensive microglial infiltration at 2 months of recovery, contrasting with the high density of nuclei of these cells normally observed 7 days after the same ischemic insult. Also, the thicknesses of the strata radiatum and oriens were not markedly different from those of sham-operated rats (Fig 8e
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our earlier studies, we demonstrated that 5 hours of hypothermia (33°C) initiated at 2, 6, and 12 hours of recovery provided a robust protection of up to 50% assessed at 7 days after ischemia. In contrast, 5 hours of hypothermia induced at 24 and 36 hours of recovery did not provide any neuroprotective effect.2 Also, 12 hours of hypothermia initiated at 1 hour of recovery after 5 minutes of ischemia in the gerbil delayed neuronal damage.4 However, when hypothermia was prolonged to 24 hours, a sustained protection was achieved.5 Three hours of hypothermia also prevented the development of neuronal damage, as seen at 7 days of recovery,13 a protection more or less abolished at 2 months.3 Here we demonstrate a smaller but still significant neuroprotective effect by 7 hours of hypothermia at 2 months of recovery. Taken together, these data show that if postischemic hypothermia is instituted within hours after reperfusion and is of sufficient duration, a long-lasting neuroprotection will be attained. However, the severity of the insult, the delay in the induction of hypothermia, and the duration of the hypothermic treatment as well as superimposed secondary insults or some other differences between animal models may all contribute to differences in the effectiveness of hypothermic treatments.
We have earlier observed a period of hyperthermia in rats subjected to the two-vessel occlusion model of forebrain ischemia, from the end of the 1st day to the end of the 3rd day of recovery.8 This hyperthermic episode evidently enhances neuronal loss because the anti-inflammatory and antipyretic drug dipyrone or cooling the rats to normothermic levels diminishes neuronal loss observed at 1 week of recovery.8 However, the dipyrone treatment merely delays neuronal damage (Figs 4 and 5![]()
), suggesting that slowly evolving pathogenic processes are activated during recovery and lead to neuronal degeneration over an extended period of time. These processes can be inhibited by immediate prolonged hypothermia because the combined treatment of hypothermia and dipyrone provides a long-lasting protection. Hypothermia alone also delays neuronal damage rather then provides a permanent protection, apparently because a hyperthermic episode also develops after the 7 hours of hypothermic treatment (Fig 3
). The superimposed period of hyperthermia is obviously capable of initiating or reviving pathophysiological mediators made quiescent by the hypothermic treatment. In other words, the powerful and long-lasting protection provided by the combined hypothermia/antipyresis treatment may be the result of the hypothermia alone provided that the complication of a secondary hyperthermic insult is abolished. The failure of previous studies to achieve a sustained and marked protective effect in the hippocampal CA1 region3 may therefore have been due to a borderline or suboptimal duration of postischemic hypothermia and/or an unrecognized delayed hyperthermic episode.
|
The morphological data presented here indicate ongoing neurodegenerative processes late during recovery in rats treated with hypothermia or dipyrone only. In the rats treated with hypothermia, the demise of pyramidal cells is seen at 2 months of recovery since microglial infiltration occurs (Fig 7c
), suggesting that neurodegeneration is progressing. We have identified the microglia by immunocytochemical staining with OX-42 antibody.14 The fact that ongoing neurodegeneration is occurring at 2 months of recovery would lead one to expect even less neuronal survival at later recovery times. A similar "postresuscitation encephalopathy" characterized by neuronal degeneration associated with dark and shrunken neurons and astrocytic-microglial proliferation was described in the cortex and hippocampus at 6 months after resuscitation in a rat model of brain ischemia induced by cardiac arrest.12 15 Also, a slowly progressing cell death has been reported after transient ischemia in the rat.16 In contrast, with combined hypothermia/antipyresis treatment, neurodegeneration is not increased at 2 months of recovery compared with that occurring at 1 week of recovery. Also, and more important, in this group there are no signs of infiltration by microglial cells (Fig 7d
) at the late recovery time, suggesting that the treatment may provide a persistent neuroprotection.
The pathophysiological mediators affected by temperature late into the recovery period are unknown. It is possible that temperature manipulations may affect not a single but multiple pathophysiological entities. Glutamate release has been shown to be proportional to intraischemic temperature.17 Therefore, at least theoretically, hypothermia and hyperthermia may depress and enhance glutamate and calcium toxicity, respectively, late into the postischemic period. Also, hypothermia could protect mitochondrial function and reduce the accumulation of oxygen species, thereby preventing free radical damage.18
In vitro studies have shown that brain macrophages are able to release glutamate19 and other neurotoxins, including reactive oxygen species.20 21 22 23 Therefore, the inflammatory process that follows neuronal damage24 25 may represent a source of neurotoxic substances, such as superoxide, nitric oxide, or cytokines,26 27 28 which could induce a rise in temperature quite late after the ischemic episode. Interleukin-1ß induces fever29 and is expressed in the postischemic brain.30 Fever induced by interleukin-1ß is potently depressed by dipyrone.31 32 The microglial proliferation seen at 2 months of recovery suggests that the initial damage occurring during the first days after ischemia may trigger an inflammatory response that becomes a vicious cycle enhancing a slowly progressive neurodegeneration. Since cooling depresses and hyperthermia enhances inflammation,33 34 hypothermia may interrupt this cycle, and conversely, hyperthermia would enhance or reactivate this process.
In general, postischemic hyperthermia may have a dual detrimental effect on the survival of those neuronal populations that have not normalized cellular homeostasis after ischemia: an immediate and a sustained one. The immediate effect would trigger a spurt of cell death by acutely enhancing glutamate and calcium toxicity and free radical mechanisms. The sustained one would involve microglia-derived mediators of a chronic inflammatory response, maintaining a secondary, prolonged release of neurotoxic substances. Combined hypothermia and dipyrone treatment would prevent both the initial detrimental processes as well as processes enhanced and made self-sustained by the transient rise in temperature during the first days after ischemia.
The slow maturation of neuronal degeneration seen in this study may be relevant to the findings in stroke patients, in whom progressive mental deterioration, not seen at 3 weeks after the insult, is evident years after the stroke.35 Also, the detrimental effects of hyperthermia on neuronal survival after ischemia are consistent with the observations of Hindfelt7 on the consequences of hyperthermia during the first week after ischemic stroke, as assessed by the neurological evolution from the initial examination to that observed 2 months later. According to Hindfelt, the occurrence of subfebrility (37.5° to 38.0°C) is related to a poorer neurological recovery, and fever (temperature higher than 38.5°C) is particularly detrimental. Likewise, fever is associated with a larger brain lesion on computed tomographic examination of stroke patients.36 37 38
In summary, this study provides tangible evidence of a temperature-sensitive encephalopathic process during reperfusion after an ischemic insult. It also shows that proper temperature control late into the postischemic period prevents the activation of chronic neurodegeneration. Moreover, postischemic hypothermia provides powerful and long-lasting protection, if cooling is maintained for an adequate period and not excessively delayed and if it is followed by treatment with anti-inflammatory/antipyretic drugs. The data suggest a prolonged (life-long?) administration of anti-inflammatory/antipyretic drugs as an additional therapy after brain ischemia.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 6, 1996; revision received May 10, 1996; accepted June 7, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-treated microglial cells. Eur J Immunol.. 1987;17:1271-1278.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Division of Basic Medical SciencesFaculty of MedicineMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt John's, NF, Canada
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These results are in agreement with recent studies in the gerbil1R 2R that achieved lasting protection (6-month survival time) with even longer durations of postischemic hypothermia. Taken together, these findings illustrate the necessity of prolonged rather than acute treatment with hypothermia for permanent protection to be achieved. Similar prolonged (perhaps days or weeks?) treatment regimens are likely to be required in pharmacological studies. Also, based on the above work, it is imperative that long survival times (>1 month) be used in all preclinical studies because several drug treatments3R 4R have recently been shown to delay rather than prevent cell death. Finally, since hyperthermia markedly worsens ischemic injury and fever is commonly associated with stroke and other types of brain injury, the clinician should not only aggressively treat any incidence of hyperthermia but take steps to prevent its development.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Spencer, A. Mouihate, and Q. J. Pittman Peripheral Inflammation Exacerbates Damage After Global Ischemia Independently of Temperature and Acute Brain Inflammation Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1570 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitati The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): e955 - e977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 4: Advanced Life Support Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-25 - III-54. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 6: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-73 - III-90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Audebert, M. M. Rott, T. Eck, and R. L. Haberl Systemic Inflammatory Response Depends on Initial Stroke Severity but Is Attenuated by Successful Thrombolysis Stroke, September 1, 2004; 35(9): 2128 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Gladstone, S. E. Black, and A. M. Hakim Toward Wisdom From Failure: Lessons From Neuroprotective Stroke Trials and New Therapeutic Directions Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 2123 - 2136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Becker, M. L. Weisfeldt, M. H. Weil, T. Budinger, J. Carrico, K. Kern, G. Nichol, I. Shechter, R. Traystman, C. Webb, et al. The PULSE Initiative: Scientific Priorities and Strategic Planning for Resuscitation Research and Life Saving Therapies Circulation, May 28, 2002; 105(21): 2562 - 2570. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Roof, G. P. Schielke, X. Ren, and E. D. Hall A Comparison of Long-Term Functional Outcome After 2 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Models in Rats Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2648 - 2657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Doerfler, S. Schwab, T. T. Hoffmann, T. Engelhorn, and M. Forsting Combination of Decompressive Craniectomy and Mild Hypothermia Ameliorates Infarction Volume After Permanent Focal Ischemia in Rats Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2675 - 2681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Mackensen, M. Patel, H. Sheng, C. L. Calvi, I. Batinic-Haberle, B. J. Day, L. P. Liang, I. Fridovich, J. D. Crapo, R. D. Pearlstein, et al. Neuroprotection from Delayed Postischemic Administration of a Metalloporphyrin Catalytic Antioxidant J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4582 - 4592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dong, F. Moody-Corbett, F. Colbourne, Q. Pittman, and D. Corbett Electrophysiological Properties of CA1 Neurons Protected by Postischemic Hypothermia in Gerbils Stroke, March 1, 2001; 32(3): 788 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Gunn and P. D. Gluckman Should We Try to Prevent Hyperthermia After Cardiac Arrest? Pediatrics, July 1, 2000; 106(1): 132 - 133. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yanamoto, I. Nagata, I. Nakahara, N. Tohnai, Z. Zhang, H. Kikuchi, and C. Iadecola Combination of Intraischemic and Postischemic Hypothermia Provides Potent and Persistent Neuroprotection Against Temporary Focal Ischemia in Rats • Editorial Comment Stroke, December 1, 1999; 30(12): 2720 - 2726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|