Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1997;28:2507-2512

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yip, P.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, R.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yip, P.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, R.-C.

(Stroke. 1997;28:2507-2512.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke

A Hospital-Based Stroke Registry in Taiwan (SCAN-IV)

Ping-Keung Yip, MD; Jiann-Shing Jeng, MD; Ti-Kai Lee, MD; Yang-Chyuan Chang, MD; Zei-Shung Huang, MD, PhD; Sien-Kiat Ng, MD; Rong-Chi Chen, MD

From the Departments of Neurology (P-K.Y., J-S.J., Y-C.C, R-C.C.) and Internal Medicine (T-K.L., Z-S.H., S-K.N.), National Taiwan University Hospital, and En Chu Kong Hospital (T-K.L., R-C.C.), Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Correspondence to Ping-Keung Yip, MD, Division of Cerebrovascular Disease, Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan S Rd, Taipei 100, Taiwan, Republic of China. E-mail liu4138{at}ms2.mmh.org.tw


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose To better understand the clinical pattern and further elucidate the risk factors and outcome in different subtypes of cerebral infarction (CI) of the Chinese in Taiwan, we analyzed the National Taiwan University Hospital Stroke Registry in 1995 and performed an ethnic comparison with similar data banks.

Methods From the National Taiwan University Hospital Stroke Registry in 1995, 676 patients (383 men and 293 women; mean age, 64.9 years; SD, 13.8 years; range, 1 to 98 years) with CI were recruited for this analysis. CI was classified into five subtypes based on clinical manifestations, ultrasonographic studies, and neuroimaging findings: large-artery atherosclerosis, lacunae, cardioembolism, other less common determined causes, and undetermined cause. Vascular risk factors, extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis, and 30-day case-fatality rates were investigated in each subtype of CI.

Results Of all CI patients, 17%, 29%, 20%, 6%, and 29% were classified as large-artery atherosclerosis, lacunae, cardioembolism, other determined causes, and undetermined cause subtypes, respectively. The present results were compared with those from eight similar Western stroke registries. The relative incidence of lacunar CI in Chinese patients was more common, but large-artery atherosclerotic CI was less common than in whites. Hypertension was frequently seen in CI patients, especially in those with lacunae (85%) and large-artery atherosclerosis (69%). Patients with cardioembolism had a higher percentage of atrial fibrillation (69%), left ventricular hypertrophy, and ischemic heart disease than the other patients. Patients with large-artery atherosclerosis had more vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and carotid stenosis. Cardioembolic patients had higher case-fatality rates than other CI patients. Of the cardioembolic patients, 17.3% and 21.8% died within 30 days and during hospitalization, respectively.

Conclusions The proportion of CI subtypes varied in different stroke registries. This may be partly due to applied classification criteria and racial-ethnic differences. Awareness of the risk factors and outcome in each subtype of stroke may afford further insights into the surveillance and treatment of cerebrovascular disease.


Key Words: racial differences • registries • stroke classification • Taiwan


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The causes of acute CI are heterogeneous, including large-artery atherosclerosis, disease of small penetrating arteries (lacunae), cardiogenic or artery-to-artery embolism, coagulopathy, and many nonatherosclerotic vasculopathies.1 2 3 Different causes of CI have different clinical presentations, risk factors, courses, and outcomes. Furthermore, these may affect the attitude of investigation and management. Many studies have disclosed that there are significant racial-ethnic differences in the distribution of extracranial or intracranial carotid atherosclerosis and vascular risk factors.4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Chinese,4 5 6 7 Japanese,8 9 Hispanics, and blacks10 11 have a greater preponderance of intracranial atherosclerosis than whites, but different ischemic stroke subtypes have received less attention in the Chinese than in whites. A well-organized SDB can provide much information and insight into these problems.13 14 15

SCAN is a hospital-based investigation. The aims of the SCAN project are to study the epidemiological and pathophysiological characteristics of different types of stroke,16 to assess the relation of various cardiovascular risk factors to cerebrovascular disease and carotid atherosclerosis,16 17 and to probe the extent and severity of atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries.18 19

The present study was the fourth part of the SCAN project; we sought to determine the causes of ischemic stroke in our population, to compare our results with those from similar investigations of different ethnic groups, and to seek explanations for any differences in those results that might exist.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
From the NTUH Stroke Registry in 1995, 676 consecutive patients with CI in 1 year were analyzed prospectively. A detailed medical record regarding medical history, acute stroke presentation, physical and neurological findings, clinical course, outcome, and laboratory results was reviewed in each patient. History of potential vascular risk factors and conditions assumed to be associated with atherosclerosis and stroke were determined in each patient, as previously described.16 Most patients received at least one brain imaging (CT or MRI) study. These patients were further classified into five categories based on clinical features, brain imaging, cardiac imaging (transthoracic and/or transesophageal echocardiography), ultrasonography of extracranial and/or intracranial large arteries, angiography (MR or conventional angiography), and other remarkable laboratory findings. These diagnostic criteria were basically adopted from the TOAST20 classification system. Diagnosis of acute stroke with other determined causes was supported by the criteria of nonatherosclerotic vasculopathy, hematologic/other, migrainous stroke, and drug-related categories noted in the Baltimore-Washington Cooperative Young Stroke Study criteria.21 The diagnostic criteria were as follows.

Large-Artery Atherosclerosis
Clinically, the patient has cerebral cortical impairment (eg, aphasia, neglect, apraxia, anopia, restricted motor involvement) or brain stem or cerebellar dysfunction. A history of intermittent claudication, transient ischemic attacks in the same vascular territory, or carotid bruit supports the clinical diagnosis. Radiologically, ipsilateral extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis by angiogram or ultrasonogram shows significant (>=50%) stenosis, occlusion, or ulcerated plaques. Infarct areas are greater than 1.5 cm in diameter on CT or MRI.

Small-Artery Occlusion (Lacunae)
Clinically, the patient has one of the traditional clinical lacunar syndromes and does not have evidence of cerebral cortical dysfunction. A history of hypertension or diabetes mellitus supports the clinical diagnosis. Radiological findings include a normal image or a small (<1.5 cm in diameter) deep lesion on CT/MRI. Evidence of cardiac sources of embolism or atherothrombosis is absent.

Cardioembolic Infarction
Cinically, the patient has sudden-onset cerebral cortical impairment or brain stem or cerebellar dysfunction. The arterial occlusions are presumably due to an embolus arising in the heart (eg, rheumatic mitral valve disease with or without atrial fibrillation, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, sick sinus syndrome, recent [<=6 weeks before stroke] myocardial infarction, cardiac thrombus, valvular vegetation, akinetic left ventricular segment, atrial myxoma, dilated cardiomyopathy, prosthetic mitral or aortic valve, paradoxical emboli). Radiologically, brain CT/MRI findings are similar to those described for large-artery atherosclerosis. The angiogram or ultrasonogram does not show significant (>=50%) stenosis or ulcerated plaques in the proximal large-artery supply.

Acute Stroke of Other Determined Etiology
This category consists of patients with rare causes of stroke, such as nonatherosclerotic vasculopathies (eg, dissection, postirradiation vasculopathy, fibromuscular dysplasia, arteritis, migraine, drug-related vasculopathy), hematological disorders (eg, protein C, protein S, or antithrombin III deficiency, thrombotic or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, antiphospholipid syndrome, nephrotic syndrome), or other specific vasculopathy.21

Stroke of Undetermined Etiology
This category includes patients without likely etiology determined despite an extensive evaluation. Patients with two or more potential causes of stroke with equal priority are also included in this category.

All patients were evaluated or reviewed by at least two staff neurologists from the list of authorship, and all completed questionnaires were reviewed and coordinated by one of us (J-S.J.) before analysis. Each ischemic stroke was assigned a specific cause or subtype according to predetermined criteria.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with the use of SPSS for Windows. The Mantel-Haenszel {chi}2 test was applied to examine the difference in categorical risk factors between the subtypes of CI.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Of the 676 patients with CI, there were 383 men and 293 women (mean age, 64.9 years; SD, 13.8 years; range, 1 to 98 years). Sixty-four patients (9.5%; 35 men and 29 women) were younger than 45 years. No significant difference in age at onset among subtypes of CI was noted except that patients with stroke of other determined etiology were younger than those in other subtypes. The distribution of age and sex in different subtypes of CI is shown in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Age and Sex Distribution of Different Subtypes of CI

Of the patients with an identified type of CI, lacunar infarction was the most common type (195 patients or 29%). There were 133 patients (20%) with CEI, and 69% of these patients had atrial fibrillation with or without valvular disease. Stroke of other determined etiology was identified in 39 patients (6%). Of these less common etiologies (Table 2Down), postradiotherapy vasculopathy, coagulopathy (eg, protein C or S deficiency, nephrotic syndrome), giant aneurysm, carotid artery dissection, and mitochondrial disease were more frequently seen. Despite many investigations, 196 patients (29%) were without an identified cause for their stroke.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Less Common Identified Causes of Cerebral Infarction in 1995 NTUH Stroke Registry

The characteristics and prevalence of the stroke risk factors in different subtypes of CI are listed in Table 3Down. Hypertension was frequently seen in CI patients, particularly in patients with lacunar infarction (85%) and large-artery atherosclerotic infarction (69%). Approximately one fourth of patients had recurrent stroke in each subtype of CI. Atrial fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, and cardiomegaly were frequently found in CEI patients. The habits of smoking and alcohol drinking were found more often in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis than in other patients. Serum levels of cholesterol did not differ significantly among various subtypes of CI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Clinical Characteristics of 676 Patients With Different Subtypes of Cerebral Infarction

Of all CI patients, 520 had received extracranial duplex ultrasound examinations (77% performance rate). Among these 520 patients, 355 (68%) had extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis, and 63 (12%) had severe carotid stenosis (luminal stenosis >=50%). In different subtypes of CI patients, 50% of patients with large-artery atherosclerosis, 2% with lacunae, 3% with cardioembolism, and 16% with stroke of other determined etiology had carotid stenosis >=50%. (Table 3Up).

The 30-day and in-hospital case-fatality rates of all CI patients were 5.8% and 8.0%, respectively. Patients with CEI had a higher case-fatality rate than other CI patients. Twenty-three CEI patients (17.3%) died within 1 month, and 29 CEI patients (21.8%) died during hospitalization. Compared with the other CI patients, there was a significantly higher in-hospital case-fatality rate in CEI (P<.001; odds ratio, 6.03; 95% confidence interval, 3.25 to 11.21; x2 test). Only one patient with lacunar CI died (due to sepsis) in the present stroke registry.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
To identify the pathogenesis of stroke is critical for both clinical practice and academic research. However, it is sometimes difficult to classify the subtype (cause) of CI.22 For example, lacunar infarction can also be caused by large-artery occlusion, emboli, or intracranial branch atheromatous occlusion in addition to small penetrating artery disease.23 In addition, it is difficult to judge the CI subtype of a case with both atrial fibrillation and high carotid stenosis.24 Therefore, a reliable classification system for acute CI is crucial for clinicians. Several clinical classification systems have been used to categorize the subtypes of CI.2 20 21 25 26 The interobserver reliability of these CI classification systems has been judged fair to good.21 27 28 In the present study we adopted a classification system basically from the TOAST20 and Baltimore-Washington Cooperative Young Stroke Study criteria21 because clinical analyses of subtypes of CI have proved to have good interobserver reliability.21 27

The relative incidences of each subtype of CI in a selective sample of other large-scale stroke registries are listed in Table 4Down. We did not include studies without further classification of subtype of CI. Nine stroke registries, including the present study, are listed for comparison.3 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 The classification of CI differed among these studies. Even the definition of subtype of CI in different studies may not be identical. The terms "cerebral thrombosis," "atherosclerosis," and "large-vessel atherothrombosis" were grouped together as "large-artery atherosclerosis." Both embolic CI and CEI were displayed according to the different study results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Relative Incidences of Cerebral Infarction Causes Reported From Selected Stroke Registry Studies

Of the identified causes of CI, lacunar infarct was the most common subtype (29%) in the present study. Our proportion of lacunar infarct was higher than that in the Western stroke registries, ranging from 10% to 24% in most studies,3 29 30 31 32 33 except NINCDS and UCSD SDBs (27%).26 35 Our percentage of lacunar infarct was comparable to other available Chinese hospital-based studies, such as People's Republic of China (27%),36 Hong Kong (27%),37 and one previous study in Taiwan (29%).38 On the other hand, the large-artery atherosclerotic subtype of CI in our study constituted only 17%. Although the relative proportion of the same subtype in other studies varied from 14% to 66%, most of the Western stroke registries reported a higher proportion in this category. The discrepancy in these studies may be influenced by numerous factors, but the following three factors deserve special attention: (1) different study design, ie, the operational criteria for ischemic stroke subtypes have a major impact on the categories of large-vessel atherosclerosis and undetermined causes; (2) composition of different racial-ethnic populations, eg, 58% were black in the NINCDS SDB, which might account for the higher proportion of lacunar stroke but a smaller proportion of the large-vessel atherosclerotic subtype26 39 ; (3) patient selection methods, ie, the inclusion of outpatients with minor stroke will also result in more lacunar and less large-vessel ischemic stroke, eg, the UCSD SDB.35 The apparent differences in these two subtypes of CI between Westerners and our population confirm the contention of previous studies in racial differences regarding the distribution of occlusive cerebrovascular disease.4 5 6 7 10 12

In most of these studies, approximately 20% of the cases were classified as the CEI subtype, with no significant difference in this subtype between different races.3 29 34 35 In our study and the studies conducted by Sacco et al34 and Yatsu et al,32 29% to 40% of the cases were classified as undetermined causes. In the studies conducted by Friday et al33 and Bogousslavsky et al,3 only 1% and 8% of the cases were classified as undetermined causes, respectively. In general, the higher the relative incidence of undetermined subtype, the lower is the relative incidence of large-artery atherosclerotic subtype.

Since NTUH is a referral hospital that serves more problematic patients, the proportion and composition of the category of stroke of determined causes should be viewed cautiously. However, nasopharyngeal carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer in the Chinese, especially the inhabitants of southeastern mainland China and Taiwan.40 41 42 Most of the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receive radiation therapy on their neck and nasopharyngeal regions. Therefore, it is not surprising that radiation vasculopathy is more frequently seen in Taiwan.43

Hypertension was a more powerful risk factor for patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (69%) and lacunae (85%) than for patients with CEI (55%) and less common identified causes (38%). This result was similar to our previously reported findings16 and the SDB results.39 Hypertension might contribute similarly to the development of large- and small-artery diseases. Diabetes mellitus also showed findings comparable to hypertension. There was no doubt that atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, and ischemic heart disease were more commonly seen in the CEI subtype. Overall, patients with large-artery atherosclerosis had more vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, ischemic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, and carotid stenosis, than other CI patients.

The case-fatality rate of all CI patients at 30 days was 5.8%, lower than the previous studies reported in Taiwan, ranging from 7.8% to 10%.38 44 45 Our study results showed that there was a significant difference in case-fatality rates among subtypes of CI. Patients with CEI had a higher case-fatality rate than the other CI patients. Of these CEI patients, atrial fibrillation with or without valvular heart disease was frequently seen (69%). The 30-day case-fatality rate for CEI patients was 17.3%. In Rochester, Minn, the 30-day mortality rate in patients with CEI was nearly three times greater than in patients without CEI (23% versus 8%).46 In the Framingham Study, CI patients with atrial fibrillation were nearly twice as likely to be fatal as those without atrial fibrillation.47 Another study also showed that stroke patients with atrial fibrillation have a higher risk of death during both the acute and chronic phases after the first acute stroke event.48 In contrast, patients with lacunar infarction had low mortality. Only one patient (0.5%) died in our stroke registry. Other studies also revealed that there was significant difference in mortality after stroke between lacunar and nonlacunar infarction. In Perth, Australia, only 1.6% of those with lacunar CI died within 28 days of stroke.49 In the Rochester50 and Northern Manhattan51 studies, survival was significantly better for patients with lacunar infarction than for patients with nonlacunar infarction.

In conclusion, the proportions of different CI subtypes vary in different stroke registries. This may be explained by different criteria used for classification and methodologies of study and by racial-ethnic differences. Awareness of the risk factors and outcome in each subtype of stroke may afford further insights into the surveillance and treatment of cerebrovascular disease.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CEI = cardioembolic infarction
CI = cerebral infarction
NIN(C)DS = National Institute of Neurological (and Communicative) Disorders and Stroke
NTUH = National Taiwan University Hospital
SCAN = Stroke and Cerebral Atherosclerosis Study of National Taiwan University Hospital
SDB = Stroke Data Bank
TOAST = Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment
UCSD = University of California, San Diego

Received June 27, 1997; revision received September 5, 1997; accepted September 16, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Mohr JP, Sacco RL. Classification of ischemic stroke. In: Barnett HJM, Stein BM, Mohr JP, Yatsu FM, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, Inc; 1992:271–283.

2. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991;337:1521–1526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Bogousslavsky J, Melle GV, Regli F. The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1083–1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Feldmann E, Daneault N, Kwan E, Ho KJ, Pessin MS, Langenberg P, Caplan LR. Chinese-white differences in the distribution of occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Neurology. 1990;40:1541–1545.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Liu LH, Caplan LR, Kwan E, Beldon JR, Ke DS, Nien CK. Racial differences in ischemic cerebrovascular disease: clinical and magnetic resonance angiographic correlations of white and Asian patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1996;6:79–84.

6. Leung SY, Ng THK, Yuen ST, Lauder IJ, Ho FCS. Pattern of cerebral atherosclerosis in Hong Kong Chinese: severity in intracranial and extracranial vessels. Stroke. 1993;24:779–786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Liu HM, Tu YK, Yip PK, Su CT. Evaluation of intracranial and extracranial carotid steno-occlusive diseases in Taiwan Chinese patients with MR angiography: preliminary experiences. Stroke. 1996;27:650–653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Tomita T, Mihara H. Cerebral angiographic study on C. V. D. in Japan. Angiology. 1972;23:228–239.

9. Mitsuyama Y, Thompson LR, Hayashi T, Lee KK, Keehn RJ, Resch JA, Steer A. Autopsy study of cerebrovascular disease in Japanese men who lived in Hiroshima, Japan, and Honolulu, Hawaii. Stroke. 1979;10:389–395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Gorelick PB, Caplan LR, Hier DB, Parker SL, Patel D. Racial differences in the distribution of anterior circulation occlusive disease. Neurology. 1984;34:54–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 1995;26:14–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Caplan LR, Gorelick PB, Hier DB. Race, sex and occlusive cerebrovascular disease: a review. Stroke. 1986;17:648–655.[Free Full Text]

13. Steinke W, Meairs S, Hennerici M. Pathophysiologic assessment of data from a Stroke Data Bank. Neuroepidemiology. 1994;13:324–334.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Ricci S, Celani MG, Righetti E. Clinical methods for diagnostic confirmation of stroke subtypes. Neuroepidemiology. 1994;13:290–295.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Hier DB. Stroke data banks and stroke registries. In: Caplan LR, eds. Brain Ischemia: Basic Concepts and Clinical Relevance. London, England: Springer-Verlag, Inc; 1995:355–363.

16. Jeng JS, Chung MY, Yip PK, Hwang BS, Chang YC. Extracranial carotid atherosclerosis and vascular risk factors in different types of ischemic stroke in Taiwan. Stroke. 1994;25:1989–1993.[Abstract]

17. Chung MY, Jeng JS, Yip PK, Hsu HC, Lee YT. Study on blood lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in different types of ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Sin. 1994;3:194–199.

18. Chen CC, Chung MY, Jeng JS, Yip PK, Hwang BS, Chang YC, Chen RC. A scoring system for evaluation of the extent of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis with B-mode imaging. Acta Neurol Sin. 1995;4:29–33.

19. Jeng JS, Yip PK, Chung MY, Chen CC, Hwang BS, Lin WH, Chang YC, Chen RC. Extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis in 1014 physical check-up subjects (SCAN-III). J Med Ultrasound. 1995;3:144–150.

20. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE, and the TOAST Investigators. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Johnson CJ, Kittner SJ, McCarter RJ, Sloan MA, Stern BJ, Buchholz D, Price TR. Interrater reliability of an etiologic classification of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:46–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Humphrey PRD, Harrison MJG. How often can an embolic stroke be diagnosed clinically? A clinicopathological correlation. Postgrad Med J. 1985;61:1039–1042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Caplan LR. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and underused concept. Neurology. 1989;39:1246–1250.[Free Full Text]

24. Bogousslavsky J, van Melle G, Regli F, Kappenberger L. Pathogenesis of anterior circulation stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the Lausanne Stroke Registry. Neurology. 1990;40:1046–1050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Warlow C, Jones L, McPherson K, Vessey M, Fowler G, Molyneux A, Hughes T, Burn J, Wade D. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project 1981–6, I: methodology, demography and incident cases of first-ever stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51:1373–1380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB. The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke. 1988;19:547–554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Gorden DL, Bendixen BH, Adams HP Jr, Clarke W, Kappelle LJ, Woolson RF, and the TOAST Investigators. Interphysician agreement in the diagnosis of subtypes of acute ischemic stroke: implications for clinical trial. Neurology. 1993;43:1021–1027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Gross CR, Shinar D, Mohr JP, Hier DB, Caplan LR, Price TR, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Fishman IG, Galingo S, Kunitz S. Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of stroke type. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:893–898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Mohr JP, Caplan LR, Melski JW, Goldstein RJ, Duncan GW, Kistler JP, Pessin MS, Bleich HL. The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: a prospective registry. Neurology. 1978;28:754–762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Chambers BR, Donnan GA, Baldin PF. Patterns of stroke: an analysis of the first 700 consecutive admissions to the Austin Hospital stroke unit. Aust N Z J Med. 1983;13:57–64.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Kunitz SC, Gross CR, Heyman A, Kase CS, Mohr JP, Price TR, Wolf PA. The Pilot Stroke Data Bank: definition, design, and data. Stroke. 1984;15:740–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Yatsu FM, Becker C, McLeroy KR, Coull B, Feibel J, Howard G, Toole JF, Walker MD. Community hospital–based stroke programs: North Carolina, Oregon, and New York, I: goals, objectives, and data collection procedures. Stroke. 1986;17:276–284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Friday G, Lai SM, Alter M, Sobel E, LaRue L, Gil-Peralta A, McCoy RL, Levitt LP, Isack T. Stroke in the Lehigh Valley: racial/ethnic differences. Neurology. 1989;39:1165–1168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Sacco RL, Ellenberg JH, Mohr JP, Tatemichi TK, Hier DB, Price TR, Wolf PA. Infarcts of undetermined cause: the NINCDS Stroke Data Bank. Ann Neurol. 1989;25:382–390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Rothrock JF, Lyden PD, Brody ML, Taft-Alvarez B, Kelly N, Mayer J, Wiederholt WC. An analysis of ischemic stroke in an urban southern California population: the University of California, San Diego, Stroke Data Bank. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:619–624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Davis LE, Xie JG, Zou AH, Wang JY, Liu YJ, Go TX, Cai Y. Deep cerebral infarcts in the People's Republic of China. Stroke. 1990;21:394–396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Kay R, Woo J, Kreel L, Wong WY, Teoh R, Nicholls MG. Stroke subtypes among Chinese living in Hong Kong: the Shatin Stroke Registry. Neurology. 1992;42:985–987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Ryu SJ. The Chang Gung Stroke Registry: 1980. Chang Gung Med J. 1986;9:204–216.

39. Chamorro A, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, Foulkes MA, Kase CS, Tatemichi TK, Wolf PA, Price TR, Hier DB. Clinico–computed tomographic correlations of lacunar infarction in the Stroke Data Bank. Stroke. 1991;22:175–181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Hsu MM, Tu SM. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan: clinical manifestations and results of therapy. Cancer. 1983;52:362–368.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Yu MC, Henderson BE. Nasopharyngeal cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc; 1996:603–618.

42. Yeh S. Some geographic aspects of most common diseases in Taiwan, part two. Int Pathol. 1966;7:24–28.

43. Sung SF, Jeng JS, Yip PK, Lin WH, Hwang BS, Chang YC. Ultrasound study of radiation vasculopathy of extracranial carotid arteries. J Neuroimaging. 1997;7:260. Abstract.

44. Hung TP, for the Study Group on Stroke. Prospective Survey and Registry of Stroke in Taiwan Area [in Chinese with English abstract]. Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Health, ROC; 1992.

45. Chang SF, Su CL, Hung TP. Epidemiological study of cerebro-vascular disease in the Taiwan area: current status [in Chinese with English abstract]. J Formos Med Assoc.. 1993;92:S112–S120.

46. Broderick JP, Phillips SJ, O'Fallon WM, Frye RL, Whisnant JP. Relationship of cardiac disease to stroke occurrence, recurrence, and mortality. Stroke. 1992;23:1250–1256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser AS, Kase CS, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB. Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1760–1764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Kaarisalo MM, Immonen-Raiha P, Marttila RJ, Salomaa V, Kaarsalo E, Salmi K, Sarti C, Sivenius J, Torppa J, Tuomilehto J. Atrial fibrillation and stroke: mortality and causes of death after the first acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:311–315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Ward G, Jamrozik K, Stewart-Wynne W. Incidence and outcome of cerebrovascular disease in Perth, western Australia. Stroke. 1988;19:1501–1506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Sacco SE, Whisnant JP, Broderick JP, Philips SJ, O'Fallon WM. Epidemiological characteristics of lacunar infarcts in a population. Stroke. 1991;22:1236–1241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Sacco RL, Shi T, Zamanillo MC, Kargman DE. Predictors of mortality and recurrence after hospitalized cerebral infarction in an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Neurology. 1994;44:626–634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. S. Babiarz, D. M. Yousem, W. Bilker, and B. A. Wasserman
Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Relationship of Cavernous Carotid Artery Calcification
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1505 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S.-C. Tang, J.-S. Jeng, P.-K. Yip, C.-J. Lu, B.-S. Hwang, W.-H. Lin, and H.-M. Liu
Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography for the Detection of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Jackson and C. Sudlow
Are Lacunar Strokes Really Different?: A Systematic Review of Differences in Risk Factor Profiles Between Lacunar and Nonlacunar Infarcts
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 891 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
H. Iso, C. Date, A. Yamamoto, H. Toyoshima, Y. Watanabe, S. Kikuchi, A. Koizumi, Y. Wada, T. Kondo, Y. Inaba, et al.
Smoking Cessation and Mortality from Cardiovascular Disease among Japanese Men and Women: The JACC Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2005; 161(2): 170 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Konishi, K. Yamada, O. Kizu, H. Ito, K. Sugimura, K. Yoshikawa, M. Nakagawa, and T. Nishimura
MR tractography for the evaluation of functional recovery from lenticulostriate infarcts
Neurology, January 11, 2005; 64(1): 108 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
U.G.R. Schulz and P.M. Rothwell
Differences in Vascular Risk Factors Between Etiological Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke: Importance of Population-Based Studies
Stroke, August 1, 2003; 34(8): 2050 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. A. Derby, K. L. Lapane, H. A. Feldman, and R. A. Carleton
Possible Effect of DRGs on the Classification of Stroke : Implications for Epidemiological Surveillance
Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1487 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P.P. Urban, S. Wicht, G. Vukurevic, C. Fitzek, S. Fitzek, P. Stoeter, C. Massinger, and H.C. Hopf
Dysarthria in acute ischemic stroke: Lesion topography, clinicoradiologic correlation, and etiology
Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1021 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. Moncayo, G. Devuyst, G. Van Melle, and J. Bogousslavsky
Coexisting Causes of Ischemic Stroke
Arch Neurol, August 1, 2000; 57(8): 1139 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. J. M. Barnett, R. W. Gunton, M. Eliasziw, L. Fleming, B. Sharpe, P. Gates, and H. Meldrum
Causes and Severity of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
JAMA, March 15, 2000; 283(11): 1429 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yip, P.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, R.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yip, P.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, R.-C.