(Stroke. 1997;28:322-325.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Neurologische Klinik der Medizinischen Klinik zu Luebeck (M.K., I.K., D.W.D.); Hyperbares Zentrum Norddeutschland am Friedrich-Ebert-Krankenhaus, Neumuenster (J.H., M.W., K.T.); and Klinik und Poliklinik fur Neurologie, Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster (D.W.D.) (Germany).
Correspondence to Prof Dr med M. Kaps, Neurologische Klinik der Medizinischen Klinik zu Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Luebeck, Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Transcranial monitoring of MES was performed in five patients with prosthetic aortic valves, who inspired 100% oxygen through a facial mask. In one patient 100% oxygen was administered under hyperbaric (2.5 kPa) conditions in a hyperbaric chamber.
Results Inspiration of 100% oxygen reduced the total number of MES from 96/30 min to 2/30 min. Increasing the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the hyperbaric chamber led to an increase from 0.3 MES per minute (1.0 kPa) to 0.9 MES per minute (2.5 kPa).
Conclusions The dependence of occurrence of MES in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves on the oxygen partial pressure in blood provides strong evidence that these microemboli are gaseous.
Key Words: embolism heart valve prosthesis transcranial Doppler ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is a definite need to clarify this question because brain embolism is a major complication after valve insertion,7 8 and the role of MES and TCD for individual risk assessment, prognosis, and prevention strategies remains uncertain despite large-scale clinical and experimental studies.
We hypothesized that the number of MES produced by mechanical valves can be modified by variation of PaO2 if gaseous bubbles are the underlying cause. Therefore, we performed emboli monitoring by TCD under hyperbaric conditions and inspiration of 100% oxygen.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The middle cerebral artery was insonated bilaterally through the temporal window. A 2-MHz probe was secured in a head ribbon. A setting guaranteeing optimal embolus discrimination from the background spectrum was used9 with a low sample volume of 5 mm; ultrasound intensity was 20 mW/cm2. This setting was maintained throughout the recording.
The same pulsed TCD device (Multi-Dop X; DWL) was used for all studies. It employed a 64-point fast Fourier transform and used a graded color scale to display the intensity of the received Doppler signal. The Doppler signal was recorded onto a digital audiotape deck recorder (DTC-690; Sony Germany GmbH) with normal speed. The tapes (DM120; Maxell Europe Ltd) were given numbers to allow blinded off-line analysis. The observers' analysis of MES constituted (1) listening to the signal through a headphone (MDR CD250; Sony Germany GmbH) and (2) watching the signal on the screen at highest speed. The definitions of Spencer10 11 for MES were used: typical visible and audible (click, chirp, whistle) short-duration, high-intensity signal within and sometimes also outside the Doppler flow spectrum, occurring at random in the cardiac cycle. A unanimous decision of two observers (M.K. and I.K.) was applied as the gold standard.
In addition to the aforementioned off-line analysis, the multigated embolus detection software TCD-8 for MDX (version 8.00 K) was used on-line. The distance between the two sample volumes was set at 5 mm. The relative intensity increase was calculated by the machine from the deeper sample volume, ie, the one first passed by an embolus during its migration to the periphery. The decibel values determined by this software differed from other decibel specifications. In contrast to manual calculation of the relative intensity increase of MES compared with the adjacent background spectrum intensity, this automatic calculation uses the entire screen as a background. This includes spectrum-free areas of low intensity. Consequently, the decibel values of MES detected during this approach were higher than those calculated in previous studies. On the basis of recent experience (M.K. et al, unpublished data, 1996), events corresponding to intensity fluctuations of the normal Doppler spectrum could readily be detected in artifact-free periods of normal people with a detection threshold of lower than 11 dB. Therefore, a detection threshold of 11 dB was used in all studies. We chose this low value to include as many signals as possible and to postpone the definition of an appropriate intensity increase cutoff level between events corresponding to intensity fluctuations of the normal Doppler spectrum and MES. The software recorded all events at and above the preset intensity increase threshold and indicated the calculated spatial distance between the two sample volumes. Fig 1
illustrates the method of operation of the software.
|
Patients With Prosthetic Aortic Valves
Three men and two women, aged 58 to 75 years, were investigated 8 months to 5 years after aortic valve implantation (all Carbomedics). Bilateral TCD monitoring was performed at first with the patient resting in a supine position for 30 minutes (21% oxygen, atmospheric pressure). During the next 30 minutes, patients breathed 100% oxygen by a face mask that was not close fitting. PaO2 was measured during both procedures (air respiration, 100% oxygen) by a capillary probe. All patients were on oral anticoagulation. Two patients had concomitant coronary heart disease, and one had a pacemaker.
Hyperbaric Exposure
A 59-year-old man with an artificial prosthetic aortic valve (Carbomedics 23) for 4 years, determined to be fit for hyperbaric exposure, was recorded in a hyperbaric multiplace chamber. The hyperbaric chamber (HAUX Starmed 2200/5.5) is based at Hyperbares Zentrum Norddeutschland, Friedrich-Ebert-Krankenhaus, Neumunster, Germany, and is normally used for hyperbaric oxygen therapy. During emboli detection, the patient was in a sitting position and monitored noninvasively (transcutaneous PO2 measurements, electrocardiogram, and blood pressure). Two physicians participated in the hyperbaric exposure procedure. During the recordings the ultrasound device was outside the hyperbaric chamber, and the leads of the probes were placed through a specially designed transmural access.
The experiment began with inspiration of normobaric air and continued with the patient breathing 100% oxygen for another 30 minutes using a close-fitting face mask. The descent was performed under compressed air at a rate of 0.1 kPa/min and took 15 minutes. At a constant pressure of 2.5 kPa (in reference to seawater depth of 15 m), 100% oxygen was administered for another 30 minutes. This was followed by an ascent phase to 1.75 kPa, also at a rate of 0.1 kPa/min. After a 10-minute period in which the patient did not breathe oxygen (to minimize oxygen toxicity), another interval of 30 minutes with inspiration of 100% oxygen followed. The final ascent was also performed at a rate of 0.1 kPa/min. After a return to 1 kPa, the study was completed with a second monitoring period for 20 minutes under normobaric pressure.
The number of MES was calculated in counts per minute to compensate for different monitoring durations (ie, 20 minutes of emboli monitoring under 100% oxygen and 2.5 kPa versus 30 minutes under 21% oxygen and normobaric pressure). The evaluation of data was descriptive. Statistical analysis was not performed because of the small number of patients. The approval of the local ethics committee and informed consent were obtained for the study.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hyperbaric Chamber Investigation
During breathing of normobaric air (1 kPa), a rate of 1.4 MES per minute was recorded (Fig 2
), which dropped to 0.3 MES per minute under inspiration of 100% oxygen (1 kPa). Increasing the pressure to 2.5 kPa during breathing of compressed air resulted in an increase to 1.46 MES per minute.
|
The following phase of oxygen breathing (100%, 2.5 kPa) again showed a decrease to 0.9 MES per minute. A second phase of oxygen breathing at 1.75 kPa resulted in another decrease to 0.3 MES per minute. After hyperbaric exposure, the rate of MES returned to resting values identical to the embolic counts at the start of the experiment.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast, increasing the pressure to 2.5 kPa in a hyperbaric chamber raises the concentration of dissolved oxygen 8 to 10 times compared with normobaric conditions. With a higher oxygen concentration, cavitation is much more effective under a hyperbaric environment and the rate of MES increases. This interference would not be expected if microemboli consisted of solid platelet aggregates or atherothrombotic, thrombotic, or atherosclerotic material. Two other aortic valve patients undergoing hyperbaric compression have been described recently.12 The first patient revealed an increase in bubble count under hyperbaric compression, which is in agreement with our results. The decrease of MES in the second patient is difficult to explain, because data regarding partial pressures of oxygen in the blood before and during the hyperbaric experiment are lacking. The author hypothesized a reduction in diameter and number of gas bubbles under hyperbaric compression. However, the opposite applies, because bubble signals increase as a result of much higher oxygen concentration.
Under oxygen inhalation, MES could only be recorded in one patient. However, a relevant elevation of PaO2 could not be achieved in this patient, probably because of chronic obstructive lung disease and insufficient oxygen inspiration.
If the composition of microemboli is known, estimation of size is possible. The gaseous nature of MES indicates a bubble size of approximately 3 to 4 µm. This allows passage through the capillary bed without blockade of microcirculation. In contrast, signals of a similar relative intensity increase, if caused by a solid material, would indicate a particle size of much more than 10 µm (D. Russell, conversation, 1996), which is critical in terms of capillary blockade.13 This explains why as many as 1500 MES per hour occur in some patients without any obvious neurological or neurophysiological deficits and why MES could not be related to a history of neurological deficit, cardiac rhythm, or intensity of coagulation.4 14 Our results also do not support the theory of hemodynamic vortices as the underlying cause of MES.15
The ability of prosthetic valves to produce cavitation bubbles can be observed in bench models16 and during transesophageal echocardiography. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that there is a striking difference in prevalence and quantity of MES rates among different valve types.5 Most of these gas bubbles have a very short life span and dissolve on their way to the brain. This is confirmed by the finding that the rate of MES detected in the internal carotid artery of aortic valve patients is much higher than in the middle cerebral artery.12 In any case, some gas bubbles are stable enough to enter the cerebral circulation, as demonstrated in patients with patent foramen ovale who received agitated saline intravenously for diagnostic purposes.
Patients with prosthetic aortic valves are prone to concomitant cardiac disorders, which are potential embolic sources. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that MES in these patients are due to a mixture of gaseous and solid particles or platelet aggregates induced by gas bubbles. However, the rate of embolic counts in patients with cardiac diseases such as atrial fibrillation or myocardial infarction is surprisingly much lower. Therefore, microemboli formation appears to predominantly be a result of cavitation, which depends on concentration and solubility of blood gases.
In conclusion, our findings indicate a benign nature of microemboli that arise from prosthetic cardiac valves. Because these gas bubbles are small, it seems unlikely that they are associated with a high immediate risk of neurological deficit. Moreover, our results are not in favor of MES as a useful predictor of stroke risk in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 12, 1996; revision received November 4, 1996; accepted November 18, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Georgiadis D, Mackay TG, Kelman AW, Grosset DG, Wheatley DJ, Lees KR. Differentiation between gaseous and formed embolic materials in vivo: application in prosthetic heart valve patients. Stroke. 1994;25:1559-1563.[Abstract]
3. Markus HS, Droste DW, Brown MM. Detection of asymptomatic cerebral embolic signals with Doppler ultrasound. Lancet. 1994;343:1011-1012.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Georgiadis D, Grosset DG, Kelman A, Faichney A, Lees KR. Coincidence and characteristics of intracranial microemboli signals in patients with different types of prosthetic valves. Stroke. 1994;25:587-592.[Abstract]
5. Grosset DG, Cowburn P, Georgiadis D, Dargie HJ, Faichney A, Lees KR. Ultrasound detection of patients with prosthetic heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:128-132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Braekken SK, Russell D, Brucher R, Scennevig J. Incidence and frequency of cerebral embolic signals in patients with a similar bileaflet mechanical heart valve. Stroke. 1995;26:1225-1230.
7. Fuster V, Pumphrey CW, McGoon MD, Chesebro JH, Pluth JR, McGoon DC. Systemic thromboembolism in mitral and aortic Starr-Edwards prostheses: a 10-year follow-up. Circulation. 1982;66(suppl I):I-157-I-161.
8. Lindblom D, Lindblom U, Qvist J, Lundstrom II. Long term survival rates after heart valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:566-573.[Abstract]
9. Droste DW, Markus HS, Brown MM. The effect of different settings of ultrasound pulse amplitude, gain and sample volume on the appearance of emboli studied in a transcranial Doppler model. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:152-156.
10. Spencer MP. Detection of cerebral arterial emboli. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R, eds. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:216-230.
11.
Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. Basic identification criteria of Doppler microembolic signals. Stroke. 1995;26:1123.
12. Spencer MC. Hyperbaric compression and Doppler-detected microemboli in prosthetic valve patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1996;6(suppl 3):69. Abstract.
13. Nanda NC. Echocontrast enhancers: how safe are they? In: Nanda NC, Schlief R, eds. Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement. Norwell, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993:97-110.
14. Georgiadis D, Mallinson A, Grosset DG, Lees KR. Coagulation activity and emboli counts in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves. Stroke. 1994;25:1211-1214.[Abstract]
15. Nicholls SC, Byrd S, Newell DW. Turbulence spectral artifact in transcranial Doppler embolism monitoring. Presented at the 1994 Symposium on Cerebral Hemodynamics: Transcranial Doppler, Cerebral Blood Flow, and Other Modalities; February 14-17, 1994; San Diego, Calif.
16. Graf T, Fischer H, Reul H, Rau G. Cavitation potential of mechanical heart valve prostheses. Int J Artif Organs. 1991;14:169-174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. King and H. S. Markus Doppler Embolic Signals in Cerebrovascular Disease and Prediction of Stroke Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis * Supplemental Online References Stroke, December 1, 2009; 40(12): 3711 - 3717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gerriets, N. Schwarz, G. Sammer, J. Baehr, E. Stolz, M. Kaps, W.-P. Kloevekorn, G. Bachmann, and M. Schonburg Protecting the brain from gaseous and solid micro-emboli during coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized controlled trial Eur. Heart J., June 18, 2009; (2009) ehp178v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rodriguez, H. J. Nathan, M. Ruel, F. Rubens, D. Dafoe, and T. Mesana A method to distinguish between gaseous and solid cerebral emboli in patients with prosthetic heart valves Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 35(1): 89 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Guerrieri Wolf, B. P. Choudhary, Y. Abu-Omar, and D. P. Taggart Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization after biologic and mechanical aortic valve replacement: Investigation with multirange and multifrequency transcranial Doppler ultrasound J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 512 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dittrich and E. B. Ringelstein Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Microembolic Signals During or After Cardiosurgical Procedures Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 503 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Thoennissen, M. Schneider, A. Allroggen, M. Ritter, R. Dittrich, C. Schmid, H. H. Scheld, E. B. Ringelstein, and D. G. Nabavi High level of cerebral microembolization in patients supported with the DeBakey left ventricular assist device J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1159 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Barak and Y. Katz Microbubbles: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2918 - 2932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A Rodriguez, K. A Williams, A. Babaev, F. Rubens, and H. J Nathan Effect of perfusionist technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass Perfusion, January 1, 2005; 20(1): 3 - 10. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Milo, E. Rambod, C. Gutfinger, and M. Gharib Mitral mechanical heart valves: in vitro studies of their closure, vortex and microbubble formation with possible medical implications Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 24(3): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Nabavi, J. Stockmann, C. Schmid, M. Schneider, D. Hammel, H. H. Scheld, and E. B. Ringelstein Doppler microembolic load predicts risk of thromboembolic complications in Novacor patients J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 160 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Russell and R. Brucher Online Automatic Discrimination Between Solid and Gaseous Cerebral Microemboli With the First Multifrequency Transcranial Doppler Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 1975 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Droste, K. Kuhne, R. M. Schaefer, and E. B. Ringelstein Detection of microemboli in the subclavian vein of patients undergoing haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration using pulsed Doppler ultrasound Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 462 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Baumgartner, A. Frick, C. Kremer, E. Oechslin, E. Russi, J. Turina, and D. Georgiadis Microembolic signal counts increase during hyperbaric exposure in patients with prosthetic heart valves J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2001; 122(6): 1142 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Markus Monitoring Embolism in Real Time Circulation, August 22, 2000; 102(8): 826 - 828. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.J. Wheatley, L. Raco, G.M. Bernacca, I. Sim, P.R. Belcher, and J.S. Boyd Polyurethane: material for the next generation of heart valve prostheses? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2000; 17(4): 440 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kleine, M. Perthel, J. M. Hasenkam, H. Nygaard, S. B. Hansen, and J. Laas Downstream turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) following aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Hall or St. Jude Medical valve substitutes Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 17(1): 20 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Wilhelm, J. Ristich, L. E. Knepper, R. Holubkov, S. R. Wisniewski, R. L. Kormos, and W. R. Wagner Measurement of Hemostatic Indexes in Conjunction With Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices Stroke, December 1, 1999; 30(12): 2554 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Kemeny, D. W. Droste, S. Hermes, D. G. Nabavi, G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, M. Siebler, and E. B. Ringelstein Automatic Embolus Detection by a Neural Network Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 807 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Goertler, M. Baeumer, R. Kross, T. Blaser, G. Lutze, S. Jost, and C.-W. Wallesch Rapid Decline of Cerebral Microemboli of Arterial Origin After Intravenous Acetylsalicylic Acid Stroke, January 1, 1999; 30(1): 66 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gencbay, F. Turan, M. Degertekin, B. Yaymaci, and I. Dindar Contrast Echoes Detected During Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Commissurotomy with Inoue Balloons and Their Relation to Cerebral Microembolic Signals Angiology, November 1, 1998; 49(11): 909 - 914. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Valton, V. Larrue, A. P. le Traon, P. Massabuau, and G. Geraud Microembolic Signals and Risk of Early Recurrence in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Stroke, October 1, 1998; 29(10): 2125 - 2128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Geiser, M. Sturzenegger, U. Genewein, A. Haeberli, and J. H. Beer Mechanisms of Cerebrovascular Events as Assessed by Procoagulant Activity, Cerebral Microemboli, and Platelet Microparticles in Patients With Prosthetic Heart Valves Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1770 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bot, E.F. Bruggemans, B.J. Delemarre, G.L. van Rijk-Zwikker, A. van der Kleij, M. Kaps, J. Hansen, M. Weiher, K. Tiffert, and D. Droste Microembolic Signals Under Increased Ambient Pressure • Response Stroke, May 1, 1998; 29(5): 1069 - 1070. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Georgiadis, R. W. Baumgartner, R. Karatschai, A. Lindner, and H. R. Zerkowski Further evidence of gaseous embolic material in patients with artificial heart valves J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1998; 115(4): 808 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jacobs, M. Neveling, M. Horst, M. Ghaemi, J. Kessler, H. Eichstaedt, J. Rudolf, P. Model, H. Bonner, E. R. de Vivie, et al. Alterations of Neuropsychological Function and Cerebral Glucose Metabolism After Cardiac Surgery Are Not Related Only to Intraoperative Microembolic Events Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 660 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bernd Ringelstein, D. W. Droste, V. L. Babikian, D. H. Evans, D. G. Grosset, M. Kaps, H. S. Markus, D. Russell, and M. Siebler Consensus on Microembolus Detection by TCD Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 725 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Droste, T. Hansberg, V. Kemeny, D. Hammel, G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, D. G. Nabavi, M. Kaps, H. H. Scheld, and E. B. Ringelstein Oxygen Inhalation Can Differentiate Gaseous From Nongaseous Microemboli Detected by Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Stroke, December 1, 1997; 28(12): 2453 - 2456. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Georgiadis, A. Wenzel, D. Lehmann, A. Lindner, H.R. Zerkowski, S. Zierz, and M.P. Spencer Influence of Oxygen Ventilation on Doppler Microemboli Signals in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves Stroke, November 1, 1997; 28(11): 2189 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Babikian, C. A. C. Wijman, C. Hyde, N. L. Cantelmo, M. R. Winter, E. Baker, and V. Pochay Cerebral Microembolism and Early Recurrent Cerebral or Retinal Ischemic Events Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1314 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Georgiadis, M. Preiss, A. Lindner, Y. Gybels, S. Zierz, and H. R. Zerkowski Doppler Microembolic Signals in Children With Prosthetic Cardiac Valves Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1328 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |