(Stroke. 1997;28:483-490.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Presented in part at the Joint 3rd World Stroke Congress and 5th European Stroke Conference, Munich, Germany, September 1-4, 1996.
, PhD
From the Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Diffusion-weighted and absolute diffusion images
were acquired, and the absolute apparent diffusion constants in three
orthogonal spatial directions (Dxx,
Dyy, and Dzz) were
measured. These were combined to calculate images of the
orientation-independent apparent diffusion parameter
Dav=1/3
Trace{
}=1/3(Dxx+Dyy+Dzz).
Values of the individual diffusion constants and
Dav were evaluated in 6 patients and 6 normal
volunteers.
Results Patient data show that comparison of diffusion constants between contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres after ischemia may give results varying by more than 100% depending on orientation. Findings in normal-appearing regions containing a mixture of gray and white matter in patients (n=5) and in normal volunteers (n=6) show that Dav=(0.92±0.11)x103 mm2/s, with a small intersubject variation, whereas Dxx, Dyy, and Dzz vary strongly. Hemispheric ratios (ipsilateral/contralateral [I/C]) in these subjects were (I/C)Dav=1.00±0.05, (I/C)Dxx=1.02±0.15, (I/C)Dyy=1.07±0.24, and (I/C)Dzz=0.96±0.28. The individual subjects in this group all had an (I/C)Dav within 10% of unity, while the other three ratios showed intersubject variations as large as 100%.
Conclusions (I/C)Dav ratios are a reliable means to quantitate changes in absolute diffusion constants for the study of stroke evolution independent of tissue orientation, gradient orientation, and diffusion time. The use of these ratios will enable reproducible intersubject and interclinic quantitation.
Key Words: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging stroke, acute stroke assessment
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DW MRI of acute stroke patients has confirmed expectations that ischemic regions are identifiable before T2 increases occur.3 4 5 6 7 8 However, since the eventual tissue damage depends on the length of the ischemic period, and human studies are generally obtained at a single point in time, it is presently impossible to determine the exact extent of ischemic evolution after onset. Thus, to obtain clues concerning outcome and the need for treatment, it is necessary to evaluate more than one tissue parameter. In addition to the essential estimate of tissue perfusion, clinical MRI studies have therefore used combined T2-weighted and DW imaging to assess the viability of acute ischemic regions.3 4 5 7 8 Welch et al9 recently suggested that in analogy to animal studies,10 human stroke signatures can be designed using changes in absolute D values and T2s with respect to normal tissue in the same slice after segmenting out CSF. However, results by Warach et al4 in a large patient population indicate that the time course of absolute D values after ischemic insults in humans differs from that in animal models. This is not unexpected given the great variability in the length of occlusion and the extent of collateral flow in humans. The results of Warach et al on ischemic evolution were confirmed by Sorensen et al7 and Marks et al8 but contradicted by data from the Welch group.9 This controversy was the subject of a recent letter to the editor of Stroke by Warach et al.11 In the present article, we will show that the results found by both groups are not mutually exclusive but appear contradictory, primarily on the basis of differences in quantification of the absolute diffusion constants.
The interlaboratory variation in diffusion constants has previously
been noticed in animal brain studies12; this discrepancy
has been explained in terms of the presence of different apparent
diffusion constants in different directions with respect to the white
matter tracts (diffusional anisotropy). As a consequence, exact
description of diffusional properties requires the use of nine
diffusion constants instead of a single constant.13 14
These constants describing the apparent diffusion in different
directions are given in the so-called "diffusion
tensor"13 14 :
![]() | (1) |
![]() |
![]() |
is the proton gyromagnetic ratio,
the gradient
length, and tdif the diffusion time
tdif=(
/3), with
the time between the
starts of the two gradients in the diffusion experiment. Thus, measured
diffusion constants will depend on the orientation of the subject with
respect to the gradient axes (scanner), as well as on the orientation
of the gradient axes used for the diffusion measurement. For instance,
use of a single gradient direction i measures a single
diagonal element Dii, while combined use of all
three gradient directions measures the sum of all nine elements. As a
consequence, the use of arbitrary gradient directions may lead to large
variations in reported absolute diffusion constants between
laboratories. This problem may be further magnified by ischemic
overlapping of both white and gray matter regions. Animal studies have
shown that the directional dependence and most of the diffusional
contrast between gray and white matter can be removed by studying the
so-called trace (or average) of the diffusion tensor
![]() | (3) |
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Subject 7 (patient 1) was a 29-year-old black woman with a history of idiopathic cardiomyopathy presenting with acute onset of right-sided hemiparesis and expressive aphasia. CT scan performed on the day of admission demonstrated no evidence of infarction, whereas MRI showed increased T2-weighted signal in the region of the left insular cortex and the left temporal lobe (time between onset and initial MRI was approximately 8 hours). Diffusion imaging was not possible on the first day. The follow-up MRI on day 3 showed extension of the area of T2 prolongation with involvement of the left caudate and lentiform nuclei, as well as the region near the left central sulcus. Patient 2 (subject 8) was a 41-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and prior infarcts in the right caudate nucleus and lentiform nucleus. On admission (23 hours after onset), combined T2 and diffusion imaging showed a new lesion. Results of conventional angiography were normal.
Methods
DW images were collected using a 1.5-T GE Signa clinical
scanner. A modified combined multislice spin-echo/EPI sequence with a
pair of diffusion gradients centered around the 180° pulse was used.
The dephase gradients for spatial encoding were placed directly before
acquisition to avoid interference with the diffusion measurement. No
additional dephase-rephase gradient crushers around the 180° pulse
were used, since crushing of unwanted signals is automatic in the first
diffusion experiment at low b value. Thus, no interference of other
pulsed gradients is present between the diffusion gradient pair. The
current hardware allows diffusion gradients of up to 2.2 G/cm, with a
rise time of 320 µs. Raw data sets of 128x128 points each were
collected at eight interleaves, zero-filled, and Fourier transformed to
obtain 256x256 images. One patient was scanned using single-shot EPI
(128x128). Total scanning time for the diffusion study was 20 to 25
minutes for the studies using eight interleaves; it was a few minutes
for the single-shot EPI. Cardiac gating with repetition time of 3 or 4
cardiac cycles was used to obtain 20 slices per repetition time; echo
time was 100 milliseconds, field of view was 24 cm, and slice thickness
was 5 mm. A head holder was used to minimize involuntary head
motions. The length (
) of the diffusion gradients was 25 ms, and the
diffusion time tdif was 40.2
milliseconds.
In each experiment, three sets of DW images with diffusion gradients in the x, y, and z directions were taken. Six gradient strengths corresponding to a b-value range between 2 and 527 s/mm2 were used to calculate pure diffusion maps for Dxx, Dyy, and Dzz using Equation 2. These were combined to calculate Dav images. The images at the lowest b value correspond to T2-weighted EPI images in the Figures. The images at the highest b value correspond to the DW images. The sum of the DW images in the three directions are the isotropic DW images. For different brain structures, ROIs were chosen and the apparent diffusion constants evaluated. The error numbers reported in Tables 1 and 2 are the maximum deviations from the average, obtained by repeating the area evaluations three times for newly defined boundaries and independently by two different individuals. In normal subjects, ROIs for different brain structures were analyzed and compared with the contralateral region. In stroke patients, Dav was evaluated in several ischemic regions and in the same regions contralaterally, as well as in normal-appearing regions in both hemispheres.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fig 2
shows images for patient 2 (23 hours after onset),
who had both an old and a relatively new lesion. Both infarcts are
bright on the T2-weighted image, but the newer infarct is brighter on
the Dav-weighted image, which also contains T2
contrast. The pure Dav image shows the newer
infarct dark and the older infarct bright. With use of diffusion images
in individual directions, contradictions again arise about the status
of the infarct, as illustrated by the absolute diffusion constants in
Table 2
. First of all, in the new lesion, the
Dzz value is close to normal, whereas
Dxx and Dyy are
significantly lower than in the contralateral region. For the older
infarct, the diffusion values are higher than normal, in agreement with
the progression to vasogenic edema or encephalomalacia. In the
completely malacic stage, a diffusion constant of free water is
expected, namely, 3.0x 103 mm2/s,
which should be independent of gradient orientation. In agreement with
this, values of
Dav=Dzz=Dxx=Dyy=2.6
to 3.0x103 mm2/s were found in two
older stroke patients, one of whom had an infarct of more than 1 year
old. When patients have old infarcts, the absolute diffusion constants
are already directionally independent, but confusion about infarct
evolution would occur on comparison of the diffusion constant of the
old lesion with that of the normal contralateral region, where the
white matter structure is still intact (eg, Table 2
, region 2). This
illustrates the incorrectness of using a single diffusion direction for
stroke evaluation.
|
Fig 3
shows absolute Dii values,
Dav values, and hemispheric ratios (I/C) for
ROIs containing both white and gray matter in normal volunteers
(subjects 1 to 6) and in normal-appearing regions in stroke patients
(subjects 7 to 12). The Dav value is the mean of
two similar regions (one right, one left), and the I/C ratio is the
ratio of the diffusion constants measured in these regions. In normal
subjects, the right/left ratio was used for I/C, and in stroke patients
the I/C ratio was used. The Dii values scatter
widely, and so do the I/C ratios for Dii. The
Dav values, on the other hand, are between
0.79x103 mm2/s and
0.99x103 mm2/s, which is the range
covered by the Dav for white and gray matter,
which we found to be (0.83±0.06)x103
mm2/s and (0.92±0.15)x103
mm2/s (average±SD), respectively. One exception to this
range was subject 11, for whom we had major motion artifacts leading to
an artificially high diffusion constant. An interesting aspect of this
case was that the I/C ratio for Dav was again
within 10% of unity. The average±SD for the 12 subjects was
Dav=(0.92±0.10)x103
mm2/s. We would like to point out that the measurement of a
Dav value of gray matter that is higher than
that of white matter may be due to difficulties in selecting clean gray
matter areas in the proximity of CSF, which has a high diffusion
constant. The images show negligible contrast between white and gray
matter, indicating that they are indistinguishable within the
signal-to-noise ratio attainable for the Dav
image.
|
Of the I/C ratios for Dav in normal-appearing
ROIs, only 1 patient (subject 9) was outside the 10% deviation from
unity. On investigation, we found that this person had once moved
permanently between acquisition of two of the different tensor
component images, leading to interslice contamination. The result for
this person seems normal because it is an average of the ipsilateral
and contralateral ROIs. Thus, the Dav value for
this person should be regarded as a technical error and does not
contribute to the true meaning of the results. We have left it to
illustrate that care should be taken in analyzing the data.
These displacements between acquisition of the images of the individual
tensor components can be avoided when using single-scan
Dav measurements.15 16
Without this erroneous subject, the average±SD values for the
hemispheric ratios were
(I/C)Dav=1.00±0.05,
(I/C)Dxx=1.02±0.15,
(I/C)Dyy=1.07±0.24, and
(I/C)Dzz=0.96±0.28. Thus, the SDs
for the individual tensor elements are much larger than for
Dav, and a large range (
10%) of possible I/C
values is found for the individual subjects (Fig 3
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to the incorrect interpretations that are possible when
assessing I/C differences in stroke using single gradient axes, it is
also impossible to give a general reference D value for
white or gray matter in this situation. This is clearly illustrated
when comparing the normal white matter regions B1, B2, B4, and A4 in
Table 1
, which show variation between 0.57x103
mm2/s and 0.81x103 mm2/s
for Dxx, between 0.60x103
mm2/s and 1.38x103 mm2/s
for Dyy, and between
0.94x103 mm2/s and
1.51x103 mm2/s for
Dzz, obviously due to the differences in fiber
orientations between the white matter structures. These problems are
confirmed by the results for the other patients and volunteers in Figs 2
and 3
. In addition to the variation of the individual tensor
components for different white matter structures, stroke diagnosis will
be complicated by the fact that most stroke regions encompass multiple
white and gray matter areas. The results for arbitrary regions
containing both white and gray matter chosen in normal volunteers and
in normal-appearing regions in stroke patients (Fig 3
) show that
Dav is indeed very reproducible for most brain
structures, whereas the results for the individual tensor components
vary greatly. Because the average values for white and gray matter are
comparable within error in the individual absolute
Dav images, the contrast between white and gray
is generally negligible. This results in a picture for the
Dav images in which basically only two
components are present: brain tissue and CSF, allowing clean evaluation
of stroke regions.14 Because CSF consists mainly of water,
its diffusion constant is supposed to be that of pure water at 37°C,
which is 3.02x103
mm2/s.18 The CSF diffusion values can
therefore actually be used as a check for the presence of artifacts.
The results in Tables 1
and 2
indeed confirm the correct CSF value,
indicating good accuracy of the measurements.
One argument against the need for using Dav
values to assess stroke evolution is that hemispheric ratios for the
individual Dii values may provide accurate
insight into the changes in diffusion in stroke patients. To assess the
reliability of this approach, we evaluated hemispheric ratios for
Dav and the individual tensor elements in the 12
subjects in this study. The results in Fig 3
again show that only the
hemispheric ratios values for Dav
([I/C]Dav) are reliable, and except for 1
patient (subject 9) who was eliminated because of a technical error
related to permanent head displacement between acquisition of the
different tensor components (see "Results"), all
(I/C)Dav are restricted to within 10% of
unity. This is well reflected in the small SD of 5% in
(I/C)Dav for the 11 subjects, whereas the
SDs in the hemispheric ratios of the individual tensor components are
15%, 24%, and 27% for x, y, and z
directions, respectively. Thus, although the average hemispheric ratios
for the 11 subjects are still within 10% of unity, the intersubject
variation is much larger than this range (see Fig 3
), and only
(I/C)Dav can be used reliably for
quantitation.
Evaluation of the Exact Area of Stroke Regions
When the DW images in the top row of Fig 1
are studied, the stroke
regions look similar for all individual gradient axes, which should be
attributed to influences from spin-density and T2/T1 contrast that
interfere with the diffusion contrast. Similarly, the individual
absolute diffusion images (2nd row in Fig 1
) cannot provide a correct
picture because of the interference of white matter diffusional
anisotropy. Thus, these human results confirm the results of animal
studies,14 15 17 in that a Dav
image is needed (3rd row) to accurately outline ischemic
regions. This is especially clear in Fig 1
(Table 1
), where three
regions of different diffusion constant (A1 to A3) can be separated
inside the lesion area. Of these, region A1 has a reduced
Dav, but a one-time evaluation of only
Dav cannot distinguish between an initial
lowering in Dav and a Dav
that is already increasing because of edema. The increased intensity in
the T2-weighted image shows that the latter is the case. Similar
reasoning applies to region A3. Region A2, on the contrary, still has a
low Dav and no changes in the T2-weighted image,
indicating potential salvageability.
For the separation of old and new strokes, DW images also provide clear
information (Fig 2
), but again the sole use of pure DW images is not
conclusive (due to potential T2 changes); additional absolute diffusion
and/or T2-weighted information is necessary. For instance, the three
images in Fig 2
clearly indicate the presence of an old and a new
stroke from comparison of the T2-weighted and the DW images, but the
combined information from the pure diffusion image shows that although
the new stroke seems already infarcted (hyperintense on T2
weighting19 ), it has not yet evolved to complete vasogenic
edema, as demonstrated by the low Dav. The
viability thresholds for absolute values of Dav,
spin-density, T1, and T2 are not yet determined in humans, but the
animal studies10 17 20 21 could provide some guidelines.
In any event, use of truly quantifiable parameters such as
Dav and changes in spin-density, T1, and T2
should allow correct evaluation of the status of different regions
within an ischemic area.
The most important conclusion about stroke evolution, illustrated in
Tables 1
and 2
, is that variability in individual axes used by
different laboratories can lead to contradictory conclusions about
stroke evolution. This is true for older strokes (age indicated by high
T2) when the contralateral site is a white matter region (eg, Table 2
,
region 2 where the y direction result indicates much faster
evolution than x or z results) and for newer
strokes in white/gray matter mixed regions (eg, Table 1
, region 3). In
the latter example, the z direction gives an apparent
diffusion constant indicating fast evolution from ischemia to
infarction, with a diffusion value and T2 higher than normal on day 3,
similar to the results for the z direction reported by Welch
et al.9 The diffusion results in the other directions are
equal to or lower than normal, indicating slower evolution, similar to
results by other groups. It should be noted that the use of individual
directions need not always lead to discrepancies in stroke evolution
because the effect depends on the constitution of the ROI (percent
white or gray matter). To avoid confusion, the trace
(Dav) should be used. We also would like to
point out that the anisotropic effects measured here could potentially
be of interest for understanding stroke evolution and that measurement
of the complete tensor would be extremely important if stroke evolution
is directionally dependent. Future experiments on large groups of
patients will have to define whether this is necessary.
Influence of the Diffusion Time
Although Dav images are independent of the
orientation of the subject, it is extremely important to realize that
they still contain information about diffusional restriction. This is
due to the fact that the signal intensity variation as a function of
gradient strength also depends on the diffusion time
tdif. This variation in
Dav due to changes in
tdif has been demonstrated in the cat
brain12 14 17 where, on reducing
tdif, an increase in Dav
was found. Contrary to Dav, the hemispheric
ratio should be independent of the diffusion time, since this
contribution is divided out. Therefore, we recommend use of the
(I/C)Dav ratio to allow comparison of
stroke evolution independent of diffusion time.
Data Reproducibility
Our results indicate that it is possible to obtain very
reproducible diffusion constants in normal volunteers and
normal-appearing regions in stroke patients but that the stroke regions
may vary dramatically from case to case. One origin of this may be the
lesion heterogeneity and the errors in evaluation resulting from the
choice of an ROI for analysis. However, we do believe that this should
not lead to major discrepancies between laboratories in conclusions
regarding stroke evolution in large patient groups. The consistent
normal data also indicate that the methodology used is robust. If
laboratories find discrepancies among normal subjects, there may be
many underlying causes, mainly related to image quality (eddy currents,
b values too low, low signal-to-noise ratio, patient restriction with
interleaved EPI), that have to be evaluated carefully.
Meaning of Absolute Diffusion Constants
Finally, we would like to caution the reader about the use of
absolute diffusion constants in determining the evolution of stroke.
The philosophical basis of a stroke signature is based partially on a
series of detailed animal studies, which have shown close spatial
relationships between the areas of initially reduced D
values, regions of abnormal pH, ATP, and glucose,22 and
ultimate areas of histopathological damage.10 21 23 24 25 26 27 28
Focal ischemia studies also show that the absolute value of the
water diffusion constant evolves during prolonged periods of
ischemia and, in individual animal models, correlates with
outcome.17 26 29 30 In addition, transient focal
ischemia studies show that the absolute diffusion constant
correlates with cerebral blood flow during occlusion, signifying that
the absolute value of D is a good indicator of risk of
injury at a certain time point.17 However, it should be
stressed that even the largest reductions in D value are
reversible to normal in both global31 32 and
focal17 transient ischemia models, therefore
indicating that both the absolute D value and the period of
reduction in D are the major determinants for the resulting
injury. Unfortunately, clinical diffusion MRI can only base prognostic
determination on a single examination, which prevents determination of
the period of reduction in the D value. Further studies are
needed to establish whether the use of multiple MR parameters,
including perfusion and T2, can provide data that can substitute for
this missing link and thus provide accurate stroke diagnosis and
prognosis.
Conclusions
In summary, our data on human stroke patients and normal
volunteers show that measurement of apparent diffusion constants in
individual directions (Dii) and the I/C ratios
of Dii may lead to erroneous interpretation of
stroke data with respect to stroke evolution, which could be
detrimental when used to obtain stroke signatures. In agreement with
previous animal studies,14 15 17 we found that measurement
of Dav is very reproducible in normal volunteers
and in normal-appearing regions in stroke patients. Our data also show
that the ischemic area indicated by isotropic DW images and
absolute Dav images may differ because of
interference of T2 contrast. Thus, although a qualitative
interpretation of the stroke status can be obtained by comparing
T2-weighted and DW images, absolute quantitation can only be achieved
using absolute diffusion constants. Finally, we showed that the
hemispheric ratio for Dav is very reproducible
in normal volunteers and in normal-appearing regions in stroke
patients. Based on the fact that hemispheric ratios are independent of
the diffusion time, we recommend using these ratios to evaluate
diffusional changes in stroke. To assess the influence of motion
artifacts on the data, one can use (I/C)Dav
ratios and absolute Dav values in normal regions
of tissue and CSF as a reference for data quality. The use of a
reliable general approach for quantitation of diffusion constants
should facilitate the diagnosis of stroke status and therefore the
testing of new therapies.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
). Part of this work was done during the tenure of
an Established Investigatorship from the American Heart Association (Dr
van Zijl). The authors are grateful to Theodore J. Passe, MD, for
assistance in patient recruitment. | Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 25, 1996; revision received December 18, 1996; accepted December 18, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J, Chileuitt L, Shimizu H, Kucharczyk J, Wendland MF, Weinstein PR. Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med.. 1990;14:330-346. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Warach S, Chien D, Li W, Ronthal MM, Edelman
RR. Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute
human stroke. Neurology.. 1992;42:1717-1723.
4. Warach S, Gaa D, Siewert B, Wielopolski P, Edelman RR. Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol.. 1995;37:231-241. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Warach S, Benfield A, Edelman RR. Time course of abnormal apparent diffusion coefficient in human stroke. In: Proceedings of the 3rd meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; August 19-25, 1995; Nice, France. Abstract, page 82.
6.
Ulu
A, Oliverio P, Beauchamp N, Soher B, Bryan
RN, Oppenheimer S, van Zijl PCM. In: Proceedings of the 3rd
meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; August 19-25,
1995; Nice, France. Abstract, page 1384.
7.
Sorenson AG, Buananno FS, Gonzalez RG, Schwamm LH, Lev
MH, Huang-Hellinger FR, Reese TG, Weisskoff RM, Davis TL, Suwanwela N,
Can U, Moreira JA, Copen WA, Look RB, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR,
Koroshetz WJ. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection
diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar
imaging. Radiology.. 1996;199:391-401.
8.
Marks MP, de Crespiguy A, Lentz D, Enzmann DR, Albers
GW, Moseley ME. Acute and chronic stroke: navigated spin-echo
diffusion-weighted MR Imaging. Radiology.. 1996;199:403-408.
9.
Welch KMA, Windham J, Knight RA, Nagesh V, Hugg JW,
Jacobs M, Peck D, Booker P, Dereski MO, Levine SR. A model to
predict the histopathology of human stroke using diffusion and
T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke.. 1995;26:1983-1989.
10. Knight RA, Dereski MO, Helpern JA, Ordidge RJ, Chopp M. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of evolving focal cerebral ischemia: comparison with histopathology in cats. Stroke.. 1994;25:1252-1262. [Abstract]
11. Warach S, Moseley M, Sorenson AG, Koroshetz W. Time course of diffusion imaging abnormalities in human stroke. Stroke.. 1996;27:1254-1256. Letter.
12. van Zijl PCM, Davis D, Moonen CTW. Diffusion spectroscopy in living systems. In: Gillies RJ, ed. NMR in Physiology and Biomedicine. 1994:185-198.
13. Basser PJ, Matiello J, Le Bihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J.. 1994;66:259-267. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. van Gelderen P, de Vleeschonwer MHM, DesPres D, Pekar J, van Zijl PCM, Moonen CTW. Water diffusion and acute stroke. Magn Reson Med.. 1994;31:154-163. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Mori S, van Zijl PCM. Single-scan magnetic resonance imaging of the trace of the diffusion tensor. Magn Reson Med.. 1995;33:41-52. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Wong EC, Cox RW, Song AW. Optimized isotropic diffusion weighting. Magn Reson Med.. 1995;34:139-143. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Miyabe M, Mori S, van Zijl PCM, Kirsch JR, Eleff SM, Koehler RC, Traystman RJ. Correlation of the average water diffusion constant with cerebral blood flow and ischemic damage after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in cats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab.. 1996;16:881-891. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Harris KR, Woolf LA. Pressure and temperature dependence of the self-diffusion coefficient of water and oxygen-18 water. J Chem Soc Faraday.. 1980;176:377-385.
19.
Bose B, Jones SC, Lorig R, Friel HT, Weinstein M,
Little JR. Evolving focal cerebral ischemia in cats:
spatial correlation of NMR imaging, cerebral blood flow, tetrazolium
staining, and histopathology. Stroke.. 1988;19:28-37.
20.
Knight RA, Ordidge RJ, Helpern JA, Chopp M, Rodolosi
LC, Peck D. Temporal evolution of ischemic damage in rat
brain measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Stroke.. 1991;22:802-808.
21. Hoehn-Berlage M, Eis M, Back T, Kohno K, Yamashita K. Changes of relaxation times (T1, T2) and apparent diffusion coefficient after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat: temporal evolution, regional extent and comparison with histology. Magn Reson Med.. 1995;34:824-834. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Hossmann K-A, Fischer M, Bockhorst K, Hoehn-Berlage MA. NMR imaging of the apparent diffusion constant (ADC) for the evaluation of metabolic suppression and recovery after prolonged ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab.. 1994;14:723-731. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Kucharczyk J, Mintorovitch J, Asgari HS, Moseley M. Diffusion/perfusion imaging of acute cerebral ischemia. Magn Reson Med.. 1991;19:311-315. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Minematsu K, Li L, Sotak CH, Davis MA, Fisher M.
Reversible focal ischemic injury demonstrated by
diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in rats.
Stroke.. 1992;23:1304-1311.
25. Helpern JA, Dereski MO, Knight RA, Ordidge RJ, Chopp M, Oing ZX. Histopathological correlations of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging parameters in experimental ischemia. Magn Reson Imaging.. 1993;11:241-246. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Jiang Q, Zhang ZG, Chopp M, Helpern JA, Ordidge RJ, Garcia JH, Marchese BA, Qing ZX, Knight RA. Temporal evolution and spatial distribution of the diffusion constant of water in rat brain after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neurol Sci.. 1993;120:123-130. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Pierpaoli C, Righini A, Linfante I, Tao-Cheng JH, Alger
J, Di Chiro G. Histopathologic correlates of abnormal water
diffusion in cerebral ischemia: diffusion-weighted MR imaging
and light and electron microscopic study. Radiology.. 1993;189:439-448.
28. Back T, Hoehn-Berlage M, Kohno K, Hossmann K-A. Diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in experimental stroke. Stroke.. 1994;25:494-500. [Abstract]
29. Dardzinski BJ, Sotak CH, Fisher M, Hasegawa Y, Li L, Minematsu K. Apparent diffusion constant mapping of experimental focal cerebral ischemia using diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med.. 1993;30:318-325. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Hasegawa Y, Fisher M, Latour LL, Dardzinski BJ, Sotak
CH. MRI diffusion mapping of reversible and irreversible
ischemic injury in focal brain ischemia.
Neurology.. 1994;44:1484-1490.
31. Davis D, Ulatowski J, Eleff S, Izuta M, Mori S, Shungu D, van Zijl PCM. Rapid monitoring of changes in water diffusion coefficients during reversible ischemia in cat and rat brain. Magn Reson Med.. 1994;31:454-460. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Pierpaoli C, Alger J, Righini A, Mattiello J, Dickerson R, DesPres D, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. High temporal resolution diffusion MRI of global cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab.. 1996;16:892-905.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. K. Lim, J. K. Kim, K. A. Kim, and K.-S. Cho Prostate Cancer: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map with T2-weighted Images for Detection--A Multireader Study Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 145 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M BLAMIRE The technology of MRI -- the next 10 years? Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2008; 81(968): 601 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Colvin, T. E. Yankeelov, M. D. Does, Z. Yue, C. Quarles, and J. C. Gore New Insights into Tumor Microstructure Using Temporal Diffusion Spectroscopy Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5941 - 5947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, V. Soppi, T. Mustonen, M. Kononen, T. Koivisto, A. Koskela, J. Rinne, and R. L. Vanninen Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Subacute Stage: Elevated Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Normal-appearing Brain Tissue after Treatment Radiology, December 19, 2006; (2006) 2422051698. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S M. Maniega, M E Bastin, P A Armitage, A J Farrall, T K Carpenter, P J Hand, V Cvoro, C S Rivers, and J M Wardlaw Temporal evolution of water diffusion parameters is different in grey and white matter in human ischaemic stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 75(12): 1714 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M E Bastin, S Sinha, A J Farrall, J M Wardlaw, and I R Whittle Diffuse brain oedema in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2003; 74(12): 1693 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Doege, C. M. Kerskens, B. I. Romero, P. Brunecker, J. Junge-Hulsing, W. von Pannwitz, B. Muller, and A. Villringer Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion Deficits in Patients with Small Subcortical Ischemia AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2003; 24(7): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Kamal, J. P. Dyke, J. M. Katz, B. Liberato, C. G. Filippi, R. D. Zimmerman, and A. M. Ulug Temporal Evolution of Diffusion after Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracranial Hemorrhage AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 895 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tamura, S. Takahashi, N. Kurihara, S. Yamada, J. Hatazawa, and T. Okudera Practical Visualization of Internal Structure of White Matter for Image Interpretation: Staining a Spin-Echo T2-Weighted Image with Three Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Images AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2003; 24(3): 401 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.M. Wardlaw, S.L. Keir, M.E. Bastin, P.A. Armitage, and A.K. Rana Is diffusion imaging appearance an independent predictor of outcome after ischemic stroke? Neurology, November 12, 2002; 59(9): 1381 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Kamal, A. Z. Segal, and A. M. Ulug Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attacks AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2002; 23(9): 1533 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Carhuapoma, P. B. Barker, D. F. Hanley, P. Wang, and N. J. Beauchamp Human Brain Hemorrhage: Quantification of Perihematoma Edema by Use of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2002; 23(8): 1322 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sinha, M. E. Bastin, I. R. Whittle, and J. M. Wardlaw Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of High-Grade Cerebral Gliomas AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2002; 23(4): 520 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Helenius, L. Soinne, J. Perkio, O. Salonen, A. Kangasmaki, M. Kaste, R. A. D. Carano, H. J Aronen, and T. Tatlisumak Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Normal Human Brains in Various Age Groups AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 194 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Kidwell, J. L. Saver, J. Mattiello, S. Warach, D. S. Liebeskind, S. Starkman, P. M. Vespa, J. P. Villablanca, N. A. Martin, J. Frazee, et al. Diffusion-perfusion MR evaluation of perihematomal injury in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage Neurology, November 13, 2001; 57(9): 1611 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Oppenheim, C. Grandin, Y. Samson, A. Smith, T. Duprez, C. Marsault, and G. Cosnard Is There an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Threshold in Predicting Tissue Viability in Hyperacute Stroke? Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2486 - 2491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Murata, H Kimura, H Kado, M Omori, J Onizuka, T Takahashi, H Itoh, and Y Wada Neuronal damage in the interval form of CO poisoning determined by serial diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging plus 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2001; 71(2): 250 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. M. Lin, C. G. Filippi, A. B. Steever, and R. D. Zimmerman Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage: Comparison between Gradient-echo Images and b0 Images Obtained from Diffusion-weighted Echo-planar Sequences AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2001; 22(7): 1275 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mukherjee and R. C. McKinstry Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome: Evaluation with Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 756 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Filippi, A. M. Ulu, E. Ryan, S. J. Ferrando, and W. van Gorp Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Patients with HIV and Normal-appearing White Matter on MR Images of the Brain AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Karonen, Y. Liu, R. L. Vanninen, L. Østergaard, P. L. Kaarina Partanen, P. A. Vainio, E. J. Vanninen, J. Nuutinen, R. Roivainen, S. Soimakallio, et al. Combined Perfusion- and Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke during the 1st Week: A Longitudinal Study Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 886 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Back, J. G. Hirsch, K. Szabo, and A. Gass Failure to Demonstrate Peri-Infarct Depolarizations by Repetitive MR Diffusion Imaging in Acute Human Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 2901 - 2906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Melhem, R. Itoh, L. Jones, and P. B. Barker Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Brain: Effect of Diffusion Weighting on Trace and Anisotropy Measurements AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2000; 21(10): 1813 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. DeLano, T. G. Cooper, J. E. Siebert, M. J. Potchen, and K. Kuppusamy High-b-value Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Adult Brain: Image Contrast and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map Features AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2000; 21(10): 1830 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Keir and J. M. Wardlaw Systematic Review of Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2723 - 2731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Augustin, R. Bammer, J. Simbrunner, R. Stollberger, H.-P. Hartung, and F. Fazekas Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Patients with Subacute Cerebral Ischemia: Comparison with Conventional and Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1596 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Engelter, J. M. Provenzale, J. R. Petrella, D. M. DeLong, and J. R. MacFall The Effect of Aging on the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of Normal-Appearing White Matter Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 425 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Tanner, L. A. Ramenghi, J. P. Ridgway, E. Berry, M. A. Saysell, D. Martinez, R. J. Arthur, M. A. Smith, and M. I. Levene Quantitative Comparison of Intrabrain Diffusion in Adults and Preterm and Term Neonates and Infants Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1643 - 1649. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Gadian, F. Calamante, F. J. Kirkham, M. Bynevelt, C. L. Johnson, D. A. Porter, W. K. Chong, M. Prengler, and A. Connelly Diffusion and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Childhood Stroke J Child Neurol, May 1, 2000; 15(5): 279 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mukherjee, M. M. Bahn, R. C. McKinstry, J. S. Shimony, T. S. Cull, E. Akbudak, A. Z. Snyder, and T. E. Conturo Differences between Gray Matter and White Matter Water Diffusion in Stroke: Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging in 12 Patients Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 211 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yoneda, M. Maeda, H. Kimura, A. Fujii, K. Katayama, and M. Kuriyama Vasogenic edema on MELAS: A serial study with diffusion-weighted MR imaging Neurology, December 1, 1999; 53(9): 2182 - 2182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y-K. Wang, P. B. Barker, R. J. Wityk, A. M. Ulug, P. C. M. van Zijl, and N. J. Beauchamp Diffusion-Negative Stroke: A Report of Two Cases AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 1999; 20(10): 1876 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Yang, B. M. Tress, P. A. Barber, P. M. Desmond, D. G. Darby, R. P. Gerraty, T. Li, and S. M. Davis Serial Study of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Anisotropy in Patients With Acute Stroke Stroke, November 1, 1999; 30(11): 2382 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Darby, P. A. Barber, R. P. Gerraty, P. M. Desmond, Q. Yang, M. Parsons, T. Li, B. M. Tress, and S. M. Davis Pathophysiological Topography of Acute Ischemia by Combined Diffusion-Weighted and Perfusion MRI Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30(10): 2043 - 2052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Sorensen, O. Wu, W. A. Copen, T. L. Davis, R. G. Gonzalez, W. J. Koroshetz, T. G. Reese, B. R. Rosen, V. J. Wedeen, and R. M. Weisskoff Human Acute Cerebral Ischemia: Detection of Changes in Water Diffusion Anisotropy by Using MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Beauchamp Jr, P. B. Barker, P. Y. Wang, and P. C. M. vanZijl Imaging of Acute Cerebral Ischemia Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 307 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Sunshine, R. W. Tarr, C. F. Lanzieri, D. M. D. Landis, W. R. Selman, and J. S. Lewin Hyperacute Stroke: Ultrafast MR Imaging to Triage Patients prior to Therapy Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 325 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Karonen, R. L. Vanninen, Y. Liu, L. Ostergaard, J. T. Kuikka, J. Nuutinen, E. J. Vanninen, P. L. K. Partanen, P. A. Vainio, K. Korhonen, et al. Combined Diffusion and Perfusion MRI With Correlation to Single-Photon Emission CT in Acute Ischemic Stroke : Ischemic Penumbra Predicts Infarct Growth Stroke, August 1, 1999; 30(8): 1583 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. Lecouvet, T. P. J. Duprez, J. M. Raymackers, A. Peeters, and G. Cosnard Resolution of early diffusion-weighted and FLAIR MRI abnormalities in a patient with TIA Neurology, March 1, 1999; 52(5): 1085 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Corvol, C. Oppenheim, R. Manai, M. Logak, D. Dormont, Y. Samson, C. Marsault, and G. Rancurel Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Case of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Stroke, December 1, 1998; 29(12): 2649 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Nagesh, K. M. A. Welch, J. P. Windham, S. Patel, S. R. Levine, D. Hearshen, D. Peck, K. Robbins, L. D'Olhaberriague, H. Soltanian-Zadeh, et al. Time Course of ADCw Changes in Ischemic Stroke: Beyond the Human Eye! Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1778 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.J. van Everdingen, J. van der Grond, L.J. Kappelle, L.M.P. Ramos, and W.P.T.M. Mali Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1783 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Singer, J. Chong, D. Lu, W. J. Schonewille, S. Tuhrim, and S. W. Atlas Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Acute Subcortical Infarction Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 133 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mukherjee, J. H. Miller, J. S. Shimony, T. E. Conturo, B. C. P. Lee, C. R. Almli, and R. C. McKinstry Normal Brain Maturation during Childhood: Developmental Trends Characterized with Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 349 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |