(Stroke. 1997;28:729-735.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Memory Research Unit and Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki (Finland).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods A cohort of 486 ischemic stroke patients aged 55 to 85 years admitted consecutively to the Helsinki University Central Hospital (Finland) between December 1, 1993, and March 31, 1995, were examined 3 months after the index stroke. Structured medical, neurological, and radiological (MRI or CT) examinations, mental status, and emotional examination and interview of a close informant were done. Prestroke and poststroke activities of daily living were assessed with five scales: the Index of ADL, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Functional Activities Questionnaire, Blessed Functional Activities Scale, and Barthel Index.
Results History of cardiac failure (P<.001), atrial fibrillation (P<.001), and cardioembolic stroke (P=.011) was more frequent in the older age group, whereas stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis (P=.048) was more common in the younger age group. The older patients more often had major dominant stroke syndrome (P=.018).
Comparison of activities of daily living before and after stroke showed that the older age group deteriorated significantly more than the younger age group after adjustment for sex, education, and living conditions (Barthel Index, P=.005; other scales, P<.0001).
Conclusions The stroke patients in young and old age groups had different risk profiles and stroke features. The older stroke patients were more dependent and disabled beforehand, and after stroke they were relatively even more dependent than the patients in the younger age group. Because older patients already constitute the majority of stroke victims, the importance of early active diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and guidance is stressed.
Key Words: aging activities of daily living disability evaluation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, whether risk factors and stroke features differ between old and young stroke patients is still not well established. Stroke causes considerable disability, need for rehabilitation and support, and considerable economic impact. Whether poststroke disability and its effects on ADL differ between young and old patients is not known in detail.
Our aim was to examine risk factors, ischemic stroke features, and poststroke disability in two age groups (55 to 70 years and 71 to 85 years) in a large consecutive stroke cohort. Our design improves previous studies by examining stroke features, cognition, emotion, and several ADL simultaneously.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 1622 patients with probable CVD were identified during the 16-month period, and after review, 175 did not fulfill the current criteria for stroke.11 12 13 14 15 16 Of the remaining 1447 patients with stroke, we excluded 229 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and 69 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Of the 1149 patients with ischemic stroke, we further excluded those younger than 55 years (n=258), older than 85 years (n=88), those not living in the city of Helsinki (n=158), and those not speaking the Finnish language (n=3). A total of 642 patients fulfilled the given inclusion criteria and were invited to a follow-up visit 3 months after the index stroke. Reasons for nonenrollment were 71 deaths before the 3-month examination (11.1%), 82 refusals by the patient or the patient's physician (12.8%), and 3 who were not identified (0.5%). Thus, 85.1% (486/571) of the living patients were included in the Helsinki Stroke Aging Memory (SAM) cohort.
The 85 patients who refused or were not identified were compared with the 486 patients included in the SAM cohort. The mean±SD age in the former group was 79.2±7.68 and in the SAM cohort 71.2±7.6 years (NS); 67.1% and 49.2% were women (P=.023), and 60.0% and 16.8% were hospitalized at the time of examination (P=.0001), respectively.
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki (Finland), and the subjects and/or their relatives gave informed consent.
General Clinical Assessment
Three months after the index stroke, the subjects in the SAM
cohort underwent a structured medical and neurological history based on
review of all available hospital charts, interview of the subject and
knowledgeable informants, and a structured clinical and neurological
examination made by board-certified neurologists (T.P., R.V.). In
addition, all the cases were reviewed by a senior neurologist (T.E.).
The examination included basic laboratory examinations and MRI of the
head or, in cases of MRI contraindications or refusal, CT of the head.
In the neurological examination, special attention was paid to factors
and features related to dementia and stroke, similar to the method of
the Memory Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of
Helsinki,17 and the Columbia University Stroke Data
Bank.18
In each patient, the case history was obtained regarding arterial
hypertension, symptomatic hypotension, cardiac failure, coronary heart
disease, any cardiac arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, history of
myocardial infarction, diabetes, high total cholesterol, history of
smoking, and use of alcohol. History of hypertension was defined as
systolic blood pressure
160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure
95 mm Hg. Diabetes was defined as previously documented
diagnosis, current use of insulin or oral hypoglycemic medication, or
fasting blood glucose >7.0 mmol/L; total cholesterol was
considered high at >6.5 mmol/L. History of previous CVD included
history of any CVD, transient ischemic attack, ischemic
stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage.
Stroke Type, Localization, and Syndromes
Types of ischemic stroke were classified according to
the TOAST criteria into large-artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism,
small-vessel occlusion (lacunar), and stroke of other determined or
undetermined etiology.19 Localization of the stroke was
divided into right hemispheric, left hemispheric, and bilateral, as
well as anterior (carotid), posterior (vertebrobasilar), and
anteroposterior circulation.11 12 13 14 15 16 20 Further stroke
syndromes assessed included major dominant and nondominant hemispheric,
minor dominant and nondominant hemispheric, deep/lacunar, brain
stem/cerebellar, and unknown.18
Clinical mental status examination performed by the neurologist assessed the following domains included in the definition for dementia according to the DSM-III-R of the American Psychiatric Association21 : short-term memory, long-term memory, executive functions, abstract thinking, judgment, aphasia, apraxia, agnosia, constructional and visuospatial abilities, and personality change. The clinical cognitive assessment included the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; maximum, 30),22 the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS; maximum, 100),23 and selected brief cognitive tests (test of similarities, fluency with four-legged animal category, ornament drawing, apraxia, and agnosia), taking into account the physical limitations and results of the Clock-Drawing Test. Aphasia was assessed clinically using the Acute Aphasia Screening Protocol.24 For each cognitive domain, we used normative values based on a random Finnish-speaking healthy community sample for those under and over 75 years of age (Reference 2525 and R. Ylikoski, T. Erkinjuntti, R. Sulkava, K. Juva, R. Tilvis, and J. Valvanne, unpublished data, 1996). A total of 451 patients were testable. In addition, the neurologist completed the Clinical Dementia Rating26 and the Global Deterioration Scale (maximum, 7).27
Assessment of emotional functions included the DSM-IV checklist for major depression28 and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale noncognitive part (ADASnoncognitive scale; maximum, 50)29 completed by the neurologist.
Assessment of Social Functions
Ability to work, ability to perform instrumental ADL, and ADL
were assessed based on the interview of the patient and a knowledgeable
informant, as well as the neurologist's evaluation. The assessments
reflected the prestroke and poststroke functions estimated 3 months
after the index stroke. The scales used included the Index of ADL
(rating from 1 to 7),30 the IADL (maximum,
8),31 the FAQ (maximum, 30),32 and the BFAS
(maximum, 17).33 34 In addition, the neurologist completed
the BI (maximum, 100).35 Stroke-related impairment was
also assessed using the Schwab England Scale (maximum,
100%),36 the Rankin scale (maximum, 5),37
and the Scandinavian Stroke Scale (maximum, 58).38
Education was divided into two categories: low with 0 to 6 years and high with more than 6 years of formal education.
Data Analysis and Statistics
We compared two age groups, those aged 55 to 70 years and
those aged 71 to 85 years. A
2 test was used for
categorical data and pooled t test for continuous data. The
differences before and after stroke in ADL scales were studied with
ANOVA of repeated measures. A multivariate analysis with the same
method was used to find out whether age group is an independent
correlate of worsening measured with the different ADL scales adjusted
to sex, education, and living alone. The statistics were made using the
BMDP and SAS programs.39 40
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Patients in the older group more frequently had cardiac failure,
coronary heart disease, any cardiac arrhythmia, and atrial fibrillation
(Table 1
). On the other hand, the younger group more often had a
history of high total cholesterol, smoking, and use of alcohol at least
once a week. The two patient groups did not differ in regard to
previous histories of CVD.
Cardioembolic stroke was more frequent in the older group (16.5%
versus 8.7%, P=.011), but stroke was related more often to
large-artery atherosclerosis in the younger group (21.9% versus
15.0%, P=.048) (Table 2
). On the TOAST
classification, 60% of the index strokes were classified as stroke of
undetermined etiology. The two age groups did not differ in regard to
stroke localization. However, the older patient group more frequently
had major dominant syndrome, indicating lesions in the left middle
cerebral artery territory (21.5% versus 13.2%,
P=.018).
|
Poststroke cognitive decline was observed in 69.7% of the patients in
the older age group compared with 58.9% in the younger group
(P=.014) (Table 3
). The corresponding figures
for prestroke cognitive decline were 15.7% and 9.1%, respectively
(P=.03). Dementia according to the DSM-III-R definition was
observed in 90 patients, in 23.5% (57/267) of the older patients and
in 15.9% (33/219) of those in the younger group (P=.044).
Accordingly, more severe decline in cognitive abilities between the two
age groups was demonstrated using the MMSE, 3MS, and Clinical Dementia
Rating scales (Table 3
). Aphasia estimated with the Acute Aphasia
Screening Protocol did not differ between the groups.
|
Frequency of DSM-IV-R major depression was equal in the two age groups, but higher scores in the ADASnoncognitive scale reflected more frequent behavioral problems in the older age group (P=.001).
Poststroke disability was more pronounced in the patients aged 71 to 85
years than in those aged 55 to 70 years as assessed with the Rankin
Scale (2.0 versus 2.5, P<.0001), Schwab England Scale
(72.3% versus 83.3%, P<.0001), and Scandinavian Stroke
Scale (51.4 versus 53.5, P=.024) (Table 3
).
Stroke-related changes in social functions are summarized in Table 4
. When the poststroke scores were subtracted from the
prestroke ones, the relative change in impairment within each scale was
significantly larger in the older patient group. The BI was an
exception, showing only borderline significance (P=.055).
These changes are further illustrated in the Figure
. The
differences between the two age groups remained significant in all the
four ADL scales (ADL, IADL, FAQ, and BFAS) when adjusted for sex,
education, and living alone. In the older age group, a significantly
higher percentage of patients were living in an institution 3 months
after stroke (20.6% versus 12.3%, P=.015).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our stroke cohort was composed of consecutive stroke patients entering a University Central Hospital responsible for primary care of all cases with acute stroke in a defined geographic area. We were able to investigate 85% of the stroke survivors. The nonparticipants were older, more often female, and more often hospitalized 3 months after stroke. This may in fact have slightly influenced the comparison made in the present study, but the selection bias is comparable with other similar stroke cohorts.41 42
Arterial hypertension, a major risk factor for stroke, was equally common in both age groups. High blood pressure also contributes to heart disease, which highlights the need for appropriate treatment of arterial hypertension in older patients.43 Cardiac failure, coronary heart disease, any cardiac arrhythmia, and atrial fibrillation were more common in the older age group; cardioembolism was also (21.9% versus 15.0%). On the other hand, stroke due to large-artery atherosclerosis was more frequent in the younger group.
In the diagnosis of stroke type, we used the TOAST classification designed for clinical drug trials.19 Altogether, 60% of the patients were diagnosed as having stroke of undetermined etiology. This is due mainly to the strict algorithm used in TOAST. However, we may have missed some cases with cardioembolism; in the present series, the frequency was 13%, but in some previous series it was 20% to 25%. The major dominant stroke syndrome was more frequent in the older group, indicating more frequent lesions in the left middle cerebral artery territory, a frequent site for cardioembolism. This highlights the need to examine stroke etiology in older patients with stroke to prevent further cardioembolism.
In a hospitalized stroke cohort of patients aged 60 years and over, any cognitive decline was reported in 78%41 and DSM-III-R dementia was reported in 26.3% of those studied 3 months after stroke.42 In the present study, any poststroke cognitive decline (69.7% versus 58.9%, P=.014) and DSM-III-R dementia (23.5% versus 15.8%, P=.044) were more common in the older age group. Thus, frequency of cognitive decline increased with increasing age, as shown before.41 Depression has been reported in 25% to 30% of stroke patients44 ; in the present study, the frequency of DSM-IV major depression was 17.6% in the older and 15.5% in the younger age group (NS).
Comparison of the prestroke and poststroke changes in the five different ADL scales shows that the social functioning in older patients worsened significantly more than that in the younger ones. The older age group was also more dependent in ADL functions before stroke, but they were even more dependent after stroke than the younger age group. These differences remained significant for the four ADL scales (Index of ADL, IADL, FAQ, and BFAS) when adjusted for sex, education, and living alone. The BI also showed borderline significance.
Previous studies have focused on outcome in terms of living at home and being ADL independent.45 46 47 48 49 However, to our best knowledge the present study is the first to examine the effects of stroke on scores of different widely used ADL scales.
Older patients constitute the majority of stroke victims, and stroke seems to affect older patients more in terms of ADL. Care and support of poststroke conditions have a growing impact on healthcare expenditures, especially as the age structure of the population is changing. Well-organized management of older stroke patients results in a significantly better outcome.50 This challenges us to provide well-organized stroke management with early and active rehabilitation, guidance, and support of older stroke patients.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 31, 1996; revision received December 26, 1996; accepted December 26, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Salonen JT, Puska P, Tuomilehto J, Homan K.
Relation of blood pressure, serum lipids, and smoking to the risk of
cerebral stroke: a longitudinal study in Eastern Finland.
Stroke. 1982;13:327-333.
3.
Lin CH, Shimizu Y, Kato H, Robertson TL, Furonaka H,
Kodama K, Fukunaga Y. Cerebrovascular diseases in a fixed
population of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, with special reference to
relationship between type and risk factors. Stroke. 1984;15:653-660.
4.
Kagan A, Popper JS, Rhoads GG, Yano K. Dietary
and other risk factors for stroke in Hawaiian Japanese men.
Stroke. 1985;16:390-396.
5.
Kiyohara Y, Ueda K, Hasuo Y, Fujii I, Yanai T, Wada J,
Kawano H, Shikata T, Omae T, Fujishima M. Hematocrit as risk
factor of cerebral infarction: long-term prospective population survey
in a Japanese rural community. Stroke. 1986;17:687-692.
6. Iso H, Jacobs DR, Wentworth D, Neaton JD, Cohen JD, for the MRFIT Research Group. Serum cholesterol levels and six-year mortality from stroke in 350,977 men screened for the multiple risk factor interventional trial. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:904-910. [Abstract]
7.
Klatsky AL, Armstrong MA, Friedman GD. Alcohol
use and subsequent cerebrovascular disease hospitalizations.
Stroke. 1989;20:741-746.
8.
Bogousslavsky J, Melle GV, Regli F. The
Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with
first stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1083-1092.
9. Asplund K, Carlberg B, Sundström G. Stroke in the elderly: observations in a population-based sample of hospitalized patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1992;2:152-157.
10.
Wolf P, Abbott R, Kannel W. Atrial fibrillation:
a major contributor to stroke in the elderly. The Framingham
Study. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1561-1564.
11.
Special Report from the World Health Organization.
Stroke-1989: recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and
therapy. Stroke. 1989;20:1407-1431.
12. Walker AE, Robins M, Weinfeld FD. Clinical findings: report on the National Survey of Stroke. Stroke. 1981;12(suppl 1):32-35.
13.
Gent M, Blakely JA, Easton JD, Ellis DJ, Hachinski VC,
Harbison JW, Panake E, Roberts RS, Tech M, Sicurella J, Turpier AG, for
the CATS Group. The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) in
Thromboembolic Stroke: design, organization, and baseline results.
Stroke. 1988;19:1203-1210.
14.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and
Stroke. Special Report From the National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke: classification of cerebrovascular diseases
III. Stroke. 1990;21:637-676.
15. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991;337:1521-1526. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial
(NASCET) Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid
Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress.
Stroke. 1991;22:711-720.
17. Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, Kovanen J, Palo J. Suspected dementia: evaluation of 323 consecutive referrals. Acta Neurol Scand. 1987;76:359-364. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB.
The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline
characteristics. Stroke. 1988;19:547-554.
19.
Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB,
Gordon DL, Marsh EE, for the TOAST Investigators. Classification of
subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a
multicenter clinical trial. Stroke. 1993;24:35-41.
20. Caplan LR. Stroke: A Clinical Approach. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993.
21. American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R). 3rd ed, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.
22. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. `Mini-mental state': a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Teng EL, Chui HC. The modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:314-318. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Crary MA, Haak NJ, Malinsky AE. Preliminary psychometric evaluation of an acute aphasia screening protocol. Aphasiology. 1989;3:611-618.
25. Ylikoski R, Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, Juva K, Tilvis R, Valvanne J. Correlation for age, education and other demographic variables in the use of Mini-Mental State Examination in Finland. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;85:391-396. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin
RL. A new scale for the staging of dementia.
Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566-572.
27.
Reisberg B, Ferris SH, DeLeon MJ, Crook T. The
Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative
dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:1136-1139.
28. American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
29.
Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale
for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141:1356-1364.
30. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;8:20-30. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179-186. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol. 1982;37:323-329.
33.
Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M. The association
between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the
cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. Br J
Psychiatry. 1968;114:797-811.
34. Erkinjuntti T, Hokkanen L, Sulkava R, Palo J. The Blessed Dementia Scale as a screening test for dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1988;3:267-273.
35. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. A simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Rehabilitation. 1965;4:61-65.
36. Schwab R, England A. Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson's disease. In: Gillingham F, Donaldson I, eds. Theme Symposium on Parkinson's Disease. London, UK: E&S Livingston; 1960.
37. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over age of 60. Scot Med J. 1957;2:200-215.
38.
Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of
hemodilution in ischemic stroke: background and study protocol.
Stroke. 1985;16:885-890.
39. BMDP. New System for Windows. Los Angeles, Calif: BMPD; 1994.
40. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 6. 3rd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1990.
41.
Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M,
Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency,
patterns, and relationship to functional abilities.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:202-207.
42.
Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Mayeux R, Paik M, Stern Y,
Sano M, Remien RH, Williams JBW, Mohr JP, Hauser WA, Figueroa M.
Dementia after stroke: baseline frequency, risks, and clinical features
in a hospitalized cohort. Neurology. 1992;42:1185-1193.
43.
Working Group on Hypertension in the Elderly. Statement
on hypertension in the elderly. JAMA. 1986;256:70-74.
44. Tiller JWG. Post-stroke depression. Psychopharmacology. 1992;106:130-133.
45.
Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi M-L, Laaksonen R, Lempinen
M. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing
outcome. Stroke. 1984;15:1039-1044.
46.
Feigeson JS, Gitlow HS, Greenberg SD. The
disability oriented rehabilitation unit: a major factor influencing
stroke outcome. Stroke. 1979;10:5-8.
47. Garraway WM, Whisnant JP, Furlan AP, Phillips LH, Kurland LT, O'Fallon WM. The declining incidence of stroke. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:449-452. [Abstract]
48.
Garraway WM, Whisnant JP, Kurland LT, O'Fallon
WM. Changing pattern of cerebral infarction: 1945-1974.
Stroke. 1979;10:657-663.
49. Sivenius J. Studies on the rehabilitation, epidemiology and clinical features of stroke in East Central Finland. University of Kuopio, Department of Neurology, Series of Reports, No. 6, 1982.
50.
Kaste M, Palomäki H, Sarna S. Where and
how should elderly stroke patients be treated? A randomized
trial. Stroke. 1995;26:249-253.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N K J Oksala, A Oksala, T Pohjasvaara, R Vataja, M Kaste, P J Karhunen, and T Erkinjuntti Age related white matter changes predict stroke death in long term follow-up J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 80(7): 762 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Dallas, S. Rone-Adams, J. L. Echternach, L. M. Brass, and D. M. Bravata Dependence in Prestroke Mobility Predicts Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2298 - 2303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-K. Welmer, M. von Arbin, V. Murray, L. W. Holmqvist, and D. K Sommerfeld Determinants of Mobility and Self-care in Older People With Stroke: Importance of Somatosensory and Perceptual Functions Physical Therapy, December 1, 2007; 87(12): 1633 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K.J. Oksala, M. Heikkinen, J. Mikkelsson, T. Pohjasvaara, M. Kaste, T. Erkinjuntti, and P. J. Karhunen Smoking and the Platelet Fibrinogen Receptor Glycoprotein IIb/IIIA PlA1/A2 Polymorphism Interact in the Risk of Lacunar Stroke and Midterm Survival Stroke, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 50 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang, R. L. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. G. Zhang, H. Meng, and M. Chopp Functional Recovery in Aged and Young Rats After Embolic Stroke: Treatment With a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 847 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Erkinjuntti, G. Roman, S. Gauthier, H. Feldman, and K. Rockwood Emerging Therapies for Vascular Dementia and Vascular Cognitive Impairment Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 1010 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fukukawa, C. Nakashima, S. Tsuboi, N. Niino, F. Ando, S. Kosugi, and H. Shimokata The Impact of Health Problems on Depression and Activities in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Age and Social Interactions as Moderators J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., January 1, 2004; 59(1): P19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Olindo, P. Cabre, R. Deschamps, C. Chatot-Henry, P. Rene-Corail, P. Fournerie, M. Saint-Vil, F. May, and D. Smadja Acute Stroke in the Very Elderly: Epidemiological Features, Stroke Subtypes, Management, and Outcome in Martinique, French West Indies Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1593 - 1597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Di Carlo, M. Lamassa, M. Baldereschi, G. Pracucci, A. M. Basile, C. D.A. Wolfe, M. Giroud, A. Rudd, A. Ghetti, and D. Inzitari Sex Differences in the Clinical Presentation, Resource Use, and 3-Month Outcome of Acute Stroke in Europe: Data From a Multicenter Multinational Hospital-Based Registry Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1114 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Martiskainen, T. Pohjasvaara, J. Mikkelsson, R. Mantyla, T. Kunnas, P. Laippala, E. Ilveskoski, M. Kaste, P.J. Karhunen, and T. Erkinjuntti Fibrinogen Gene Promoter -455 A Allele as a Risk Factor for Lacunar Stroke Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 886 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tilling, J. A.C. Sterne, A. G. Rudd, T. A. Glass, R. J. Wityk, and C. D.A. Wolfe A New Method for Predicting Recovery After Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2001; 32(12): 2867 - 2873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Uchino, D. Billheimer, and S. C. Cramer Entry Criteria and Baseline Characteristics Predict Outcome in Acute Stroke Trials Stroke, April 1, 2001; 32(4): 909 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lamassa, A. Di Carlo, G. Pracucci, A. M. Basile, G. Trefoloni, P. Vanni, S. Spolveri, M. C. Baruffi, G. Landini, A. Ghetti, et al. Characteristics, Outcome, and Care of Stroke Associated With Atrial Fibrillation in Europe : Data From a Multicenter Multinational Hospital-Based Registry (The European Community Stroke Project) Stroke, February 1, 2001; 32(2): 392 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Carod-Artal, J. A. Egido, J. L. Gonzalez, and E. Varela de Seijas Quality of Life Among Stroke Survivors Evaluated 1 Year After Stroke : Experience of a Stroke Unit Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 2995 - 3000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mantyla, T. Pohjasvaara, R. Vataja, O. Salonen, H. J. Aronen, C.-G. Standertskjold-Nordenstam, M. Kaste, and T. Erkinjuntti MRI Pontine Hyperintensity After Supratentorial Ischemic Stroke Relates to Poor Clinical Outcome Stroke, March 1, 2000; 31(3): 695 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Di Carlo, M. Lamassa, G. Pracucci, A. M. Basile, G. Trefoloni, P. Vanni, C. D. A. Wolfe, K. Tilling, S. Ebrahim, and D. Inzitari Stroke in the Very Old : Clinical Presentation and Determinants of 3-Month Functional Outcome: A European Perspective Stroke, November 1, 1999; 30(11): 2313 - 2319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mantyla, H. J. Aronen, O. Salonen, T. Pohjasvaara, M. Korpelainen, T. Peltonen, C.-G. Standertskjold-Nordenstam, M. Kaste, and T. Erkinjuntti Magnetic Resonance Imaging White Matter Hyperintensities and Mechanism of Ischemic Stroke Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30(10): 2053 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Sanchez-Blanco, C Ochoa-Sangrador, L Lopez-Munain, M Izquierdo-Sanchez, and J Fermoso-Garcia Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 1999; 13(6): 464 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pohjasvaara, A. Leppavuori, I. Siira, R. Vataja, M. Kaste, and T. Erkinjuntti Frequency and Clinical Determinants of Poststroke Depression Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2311 - 2317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhu, L. Fratiglioni, Z. Guo, H. Aguero-Torres, B. Winblad, and M. Viitanen Association of Stroke With Dementia, Cognitive Impairment, and Functional Disability in the Very Old : A Population-Based Study Stroke, October 1, 1998; 29(10): 2094 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Grimby, E. Andren, Y. Daving, and B. Wright Dependence and Perceived Difficulty in Daily Activities in Community-Living Stroke Survivors 2 Years After Stroke : A Study of Instrumental Structures Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1843 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pohjasvaara, T. Erkinjuntti, R. Ylikoski, M. Hietanen, R. Vataja, and M. Kaste Clinical Determinants of Poststroke Dementia Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 75 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mantyla, T. Erkinjuntti, O. Salonen, H. J. Aronen, T. Peltonen, T. Pohjasvaara, and C.-G. Standertskjold-Nordenstam Variable Agreement Between Visual Rating Scales for White Matter Hyperintensities on MRI : Comparison of 13 Rating Scales in a Poststroke Cohort Stroke, August 1, 1997; 28(8): 1614 - 1623. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |