(Stroke. 1997;28:768-773.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical School, Rotterdam (M.L.B., A.H., D.E.G.); the Julius Center for Patient-Oriented Research, Utrecht University (M.L.B., D.E.G.), Utrecht; and the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Rotterdam (E.C. van der W., P.J.K.), the Netherlands.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods The Rotterdam Study is a population-based cohort study of 7983 subjects, aged 55 years and over, conducted in a district of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. At baseline examination, a history of episodes of disturbances in sensibility, strength, speech, and vision that lasted less than 24 hours and occurred within the preceding 3 years was determined by a trained physician. When such a history was present, information on time of onset, duration, and disappearance of symptoms and a detailed description of the symptoms (in ordinary language) were obtained. Subjects were classified by a neurologist as typical TIA or nonspecific TNA.
Results Prevalence of TNAs was 1.9% in subjects aged 55 to 64 years, 3.5% in subjects aged 65 to 74 years, 4.3% in subjects aged 75 to 84 years, and 5.1% in subjects aged 85 years or over. Prevalence figures for typical TIA were 0.9%, 1.7%, 2.3%, and 2.2% and for nonspecific TNA 1.0%, 1.8%, 2.0%, and 2.9%, respectively. Clinical parameters such as number of attacks, onset, duration, and disappearance of symptoms were similar for typical TIA and nonspecific TNA. Increased age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, low HDL cholesterol, Q-wave myocardial infarction on electrocardiogram, and carotid atherosclerosis were related to typical TIA, whereas increased age, hypertension, low HDL cholesterol, smoking, and angina pectoris were associated with nonspecific TNA.
Conclusions About half of the subjects with a TNA had symptoms that were not entirely typical for a TIA. Differences in associations with risk factors between typical TIA and nonspecific TNA point toward different underlying mechanisms of symptoms and may lead to different ancillary investigations and possibly treatment.
Key Words: cerebrovascular disorders epidemiology cerebral ischemia, transient the Netherlands
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we assessed the prevalences of typical TIA and nonspecific TNA and their determinants in a Dutch population-based cohort of 55 years and over.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assessment of History of TNA
During the visit at the research center, a trained Rotterdam
Study physician asked all participants, "Did you experience a short
period with disturbances of sensibility in your face, arms, or
legs, which lasted less than 24 hours over the last 3 years?"
Similar questions were asked for disturbances in strength,
speech, and vision. When answers were positive, time of onset,
duration, and disappearance of symptoms and whether a general
practitioner had been consulted were recorded.
Additionally, a detailed description of the symptoms in ordinary
language was obtained.8 On the basis of this information,
one of the investigators, a neurologist (P.J.K.), classified subjects
as typical TIA, nonspecific neurological attacks (atypical TIA), or no
TIA.9 An attack was regarded as being a typical TIA
according to the guidelines of the Ad Hoc Committee for the
Classification and Outline of Cerebrovascular Disease4 :
ie, (1) weakness, clumsiness, or sensory alteration in one or both
limbs on the same side, speech or language disturbance, loss of
vision in one eye or part of the eye, or homonymous hemianopsia for
symptoms that pertain to the carotid territory; (2) weakness or
clumsiness (sometimes changing from one side to another), sensory
alteration, complete blindness or homonymous hemianopsia, ataxia,
imbalance, or unsteadiness not associated with vertigo; and/or (3) two
or more of the following: diplopia, dysphagia, dysarthria, or vertigo
for symptoms that pertain to the vertebrobasilar
territory.10 The attack was judged nonspecific if the
subject had one or more of the following symptoms: disturbances
of vision in one or both eyes consisting of flashes, objects,
distorted-view tunnel vision, or image moving on change of posture;
alteration of muscle strength consisting of tiredness or heavy
sensation in one or more limbs, either unilateral or bilateral; sensory
symptoms alone (unilateral or bilateral) or a gradual spread of sensory
symptoms; brain stem symptoms and coordination difficulties consisting
of isolated disorder of swallowing or articulation, double vision,
dizziness, or uncoordinated movements; and accompanying symptoms
including unconsciousness, limb jerking, tingling of the limbs or lips,
disorientation, and amnesia.6 A reproducibility study in
which 121 case histories were reclassified by the same neurologist,
blinded for the initial diagnosis, revealed a weighted
of 0.77
(P<.05), indicating a good reproducibility.
A second source of information on TIA came from those subjects who had replied affirmatively to the question "Did you ever suffer from a stroke?" Of these subjects, supplementary medical information, such as a copy of the hospital discharge records or a detailed description of the signs and symptoms, was obtained from the general practitioner. On the basis of the available information, these subjects were also classified by the same neurologist as having had a stroke, a (typical/nonspecific) TNA but not a stroke, or neither a TNA nor a stroke. As described elsewhere, 14% of the subjects were classified as having had a TNA but no stroke.11 The two sources were combined in the present analyses. In short, of all subjects with available information on the questions on TNA and stroke, negative answers on both questions were reported by 6830 subjects; 246 reported a stroke but not a TNA; 157 subjects reported no stroke but a TNA; and 70 reported both a stroke and a TNA. Of these 70 subjects, 36 were considered to have a typical TIA, 21 were considered to have had a stroke after the TNA, and 13 were considered to have had a nonspecific TNA.
Cardiovascular Risk Factors
In the Rotterdam Study, information on health status,
medical history, current drug use, and smoking was obtained using a
computerized questionnaire, which included a Dutch version of the Rose
questionnaire for assessment of prevalent angina
pectoris.12 Determination of a history of myocardial
infarction was based on the question "Did you ever suffer from a
myocardial infarction for which you were hospitalized?" Diabetes
mellitus was considered present when subjects were currently using
oral blood sugarlowering drugs or receiving insulin treatment. With
respect to smoking, subjects were categorized into groups of current
smokers, former smokers, and those who had never smoked. During two
visits at the research center, several cardiovascular
risk factors were measured. Height and weight were measured, and body
mass index (kilograms per meter squared) was calculated. Sitting blood
pressure was measured at the right upper arm using a random-zero
sphygmomanometer. The average of two measurements obtained at one
occasion, separated by a count of the pulse rate, was used in the
present analysis. Hypertension was defined as a
systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or higher, a
diastolic blood pressure of 95 mm Hg or higher, or
current use of antihypertensive drugs for the indication hypertension.
Carotid atherosclerosis was assessed using ATL
Ultramark IV with a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer. The common carotid
artery and the carotid bifurcation were evaluated on-line for the
presence (yes/no) of atherosclerotic lesions on both the near and the
far wall of the carotid artery. Atherosclerosis was
considered present when one or more plaques were seen during
ultrasonography as described elsewhere.13 Plaques were
defined as a focal widening relative to adjacent segments, with
protrusion into the lumen composed of either calcified deposits only or
a combination of calcification and noncalcified material. No attempt
was made to quantify the size or extent of the lesions or the
percentage of stenosis of the carotid arteries. An ECG was made
in 6579 subjects, and the presence of a myocardial infarction (Q-wave)
and arrhythmia was assessed using an automated
diagnostic classification system of the Modular
Electrocardiogram Analysis System
(MEANS).14 15 Because of the limited number of subjects
with cardiac arrhythmias, we defined arrhythmia as
either atrial flutter (0.2%), atrial fibrillation (2.9%), atrial
arrhythmia (0.5%), or atrioventricular
arrhythmia (1.0%). A nonfasting venous blood sample was taken
as described elsewhere.16 Serum total
cholesterol was determined using an automated enzymatic
procedure. HDL cholesterol was measured similarly, after
precipitation of the non-HDL fraction with phosphotungstate
magnesium.
Data Analysis
Subjects of the Rotterdam Study pilot phase were excluded
(n=384) because of differences in the questionnaire. No information was
available on the TNA symptom questions in the interview of 245
subjects. Complete self-reported information was therefore available
for 7354 subjects. Results on prevalence are presented by age
and sex. The age on the day of participation (interview) was used in
the analysis of prevalence. Logistic regression was applied to
study the association between cardiovascular risk
factors and both typical TIA and nonspecific TNA. ORs were calculated
as measures of strength of the association, and results are expressed
with a corresponding 95% CI.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
No difference in frequency of general clinical characteristics
such as number of attacks, time of onset of symptoms, and disappearance
of symptoms was found between typical TIA and nonspecific TNA (Fig 1
). The proportion of subjects with disappearance of the
symptoms "at once" was clearly higher in those with nonspecific
attacks than in those with typical attacks (47.5% versus 33.0%).
Results were similar for men and women and across age groups. Of the
subjects with TIA, 74.0% consulted a general practitioner
for their symptoms, and 71.3% of those with a nonspecific TNA did also
(P=.65, for the age- and sex-adjusted difference).
Unfortunately, information on whether or not a patient had been
referred to a neurologist was not collected.
|
Analyses with adjustments for age and sex revealed that typical
TIA was significantly and positively associated with age (OR per year,
1.04; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.06), male sex (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06 to
1.64), diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.99), Q-wave
myocardial infarction (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.91), and carotid
plaques (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.68) and inversely with HDL
cholesterol (OR per mmol/L, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23 to
0.80). Analyses for nonspecific TNA showed significant
associations with age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.06), hypertension
(OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.43), current smoking (OR, 1.73; 95% CI,
1.15 to 2.60), and angina pectoris (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.53)
and inverse associations with HDL cholesterol (OR, 0.46;
95% CI, 0.26 to 0.83). In a multivariate logistic
model including all these risk factors, increasing age and presence of
carotid plaques remained independent predictors of typical TIA, whereas
hypertension, smoking, and angina pectoris proved to be independent
predictors of nonspecific TNA (Table 4
). Cardiac
arrhythmia was not related to either typical TIA or nonspecific
TNA: age- and sex-adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 1.24 (0.59 to 2.61) and
1.20 (0.57 to 2.53), respectively.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In cross-sectional studies, several factors may lead to an underestimation of the true prevalence. In the present study, subjects living in homes for the elderly were included, whereas subjects residing in nursing homes were not included. Exclusion of these usually very old subjects with a high prevalence of disabling disease may have led to an underestimation of the TIA prevalence. Similarly, information on subjects who declined the invitation to participate in the Rotterdam Study (22%) is missing. In this group, the prevalence of TIA might have been higher than in the participating subjects. Also, other subjects, in particular those with impaired cognitive function, may have been "missed" because of false-negative answers to the screening questions; the extent of this, however, cannot be ascertained. Available prevalence estimates for the Netherlands are very limited and come from studies among general-practitioner practices.17 18 A direct comparison is, however, not possible because of lack of age- and sex-specific prevalence data.
A limited number of population-based studies on the prevalence of
TIA have been performed in industrialized countries.19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Because frequency of occurrence of TNA is a function of the population
cardiovascular risk profile, which is known to differ
across countries, prevalence estimates of TNAs are likely to vary
across studies. Furthermore, the studies differed in methods used to
assess TNAs (ie, a questionnaire only, a questionnaire combined with
physical examination, a questionnaire combined with an examination by a
neurologist), in population size, in time period, and in extent of
nonresponse. These factors limit comparison of the findings across
studies. Consequently, the findings of the prevalence studies show
considerable variation (Fig 2
).
|
Several factors have been put forward as causes of TIAs, of which extracranial atherosclerosis, predominantly in the carotid artery, and cardiac disease (acute myocardial infarction, valvular disease, arrhythmias) are the most frequent. In the present study, we observed that indicators of large-vessel atherosclerosis, such as Q-wave myocardial infarction and presence of carotid plaques, were more strongly related to typical TIA than to nonspecific TNA. This may suggest that typical symptoms are more likely to be of atherosclerotic origin. The higher cardiac event rate among those subjects with nonspecific TNAs in the Dutch TIA trial generated the hypothesis that some of the nonspecific atypical attacks may be due to cardiac arrhythmia.6 Because long-term ECG monitoring was not performed in the present study, we could not confirm or refute the hypothesis. As in the Dutch TIA trial, baseline ECG abnormalities did not differ between typical and nonspecific TNA. The association between atypical symptoms and angina pectoris in the present study may imply that in some of the subjects with atypical symptoms, the attack may initially have been angina pectoris followed by anxiety-induced hyperventilation with associated sensory symptoms.
The distinction between typical and nonspecific TNA may be important for diagnostic procedures and possibly treatment of these patients presenting at the clinic. If our findings are confirmed in future studies, it may be recommended that subjects with nonspecific attacks should be carefully evaluated by a neurologist.9
In conclusion, about half of the subjects with TNAs had symptoms that were not entirely typical for a TIA. Differences in associations with risk factors between typical TIA and nonspecific TNA point toward different underlying mechanisms of symptoms and may lead to different ancillary investigations and possibly treatment.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 7, 1996; revision received January 17, 1997; accepted January 20, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Howard G, Evans GW, Crouse JR III, Toole JF, Ryu JE, Tegeler C, Frye-Pierson RN, Mitchell E, Sanders L. A prospective reevaluation of transient ischemic attacks as risk factors for death and fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events. Stroke. 1994;25:342-345. [Abstract]
3.
Dennis M, Bamford J, Sandercock P, Warlow C.
Prognosis of transient ischemic attacks in the Oxfordshire
Community Stroke project. Stroke. 1990;21:848-853.
4. Ad Hoc Committee on the Classification and Outline of Cerebrovascular disease II. Stroke. 1975;6:566-616.
5. Millikan CH. The transient ischemic attack. Adv Neurol. 1979;25:135-140. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Koudstaal PJ, Algra A, Pop GAM, Kappelle LJ, van Latum JC, van Gijn J, for the Dutch TIA Study group. Risk of cardiac events in atypical transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet. 1992;340:630-633. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Hofman A, Grobbee DE, De Jong PTVM, Van den Ouweand FAM. Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991;7:403-422. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Koudstaal PJ, van Gijn J, Staal A, Duivenvoorden HJ,
Gerritsma JGM, Kraaijenveld CL. Diagnosis of transient
ischemic attacks: improvement of interobserver agreement by a
checklist in ordinary language. Stroke. 1986;17:723-728.
9. Koudstaal PJ. Transient ischemic attacks: diagnosis and prognosis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4(suppl 1):40-46.
10. Koudstaal PJ. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis of transient ischemic attacks. In: Adams HP, ed. Handbook of Cerebrovascular Diseases. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1993:35-45.
11.
Bots ML, Looman SJ, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Hoes AW,
Grobbee DE. Prevalence of stroke in the general population: the
Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 1996;27:1499-1501.
12. Rose GA, Blackburn H, Gillum RF, Prineas RL. Cardiovascular Survey Methods. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1982.
13. Bots ML, Hofman A, de Jong PTVM, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness as an indicator of atherosclerosis at other sites of the carotid artery: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6:147-153. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Van Bemmel JH, Kors JA, van Herpen G. Methodology for the Modular Electrocardiogram Analysis System (MEANS). Methods Inf Med. 1990;29:346-353. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1767-1773. [Abstract]
16. van der Bom JG, Bots ML, de Bruijn AM, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Measurement of beta-thromboglobulin in the elderly: findings from the Rotterdam Study. Fibrinolysis. 1994;8(suppl 2):157-159.
17. Meyboom-de Jong B, Smith RJA. Cerebrovascular diseases in the elderly in the general practitioners practice [in Dutch]. Huisarts Wet. 1989;32:359-365.
18. Nijmeegs Universitair Huisartsen Instituut. Morbidity Figures From General Practice: Data From Four General Practices, 1978-1982. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Nijmeegs Universitair Huisartsen Instituut; 1985.
19.
Ostfeld AM, Shelleke RB, Klawans HL. Transient
ischemic attacks and risk of stroke in an elderly poor
population. Stroke. 1973;4:980-986.
20.
Karp HR, Heyman A, Heyden S, Bartel AG, Tyroler HA,
Hames CG. Transient cerebral ischemia: prevalence and
prognosis in a biracial rural community. JAMA. 1973;225:125-128.
21.
Urakami K, Igo M, Takahashi K. An epidemiologic
study of cerebrovascular disease in western Japan with special
reference to transient ischemic attacks.
Stroke. 1987;18:396-401.
22.
Li S, Schoenberg BS, Wang CC, Cheng X, Bolis CL, Wang
K. Cerebrovascular disease in the People's Republic of China:
epidemiologic and clinical features. Neurology. 1985;35:1708-1713.
23. Frariglioni L, Arfaioli C, Nencini P, Giananneschi A, Iaquinta L, Marchi M, Inzitari D. Transient ischemic attacks in the community: occurrence and clinical characteristics. Neuroepidemiology. 1989;8:87-96. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP, O'Fallon WM, Frye RL. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus in residents of Rochester, Minnesota. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990;655:344-359.
25. Toole JF, Chambless LE, Heiss G, Tyroler HA, Paton CC. Prevalence of stroke and transient ischemic attacks in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:500-503. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Mittelmark MB, Psaty BM, Rautaharju P, Fried LP, Borhani NO, Tracy RP, Gardin JM, O'Leary DH. Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases among older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;127:311-317.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. C. Sheehan, A. Merwick, L. A. Kelly, N. Hannon, M. Marnane, L. Kyne, P. M.E. McCormack, J. Duggan, A. Moore, J. Moroney, et al. Diagnostic Usefulness of the ABCD2 Score to Distinguish Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Ischemic Stroke From Noncerebrovascular Events: The North Dublin TIA Study Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3449 - 3454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Bos, M. J. E. van Rijn, J. C. M. Witteman, A. Hofman, P. J. Koudstaal, and M. M. B. Breteler Incidence and Prognosis of Transient Neurological Attacks JAMA, December 26, 2007; 298(24): 2877 - 2885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Sherman Reconsideration of TIA diagnostic criteria Neurology, April 27, 2004; 62(8_suppl_6): S20 - S21. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Verro Early risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack: back to the future Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 30, 2004; 170(7): 1113 - 1114. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C.C. Johnston and M. D. Hill The patient with transient cerebral ischemia: a golden opportunity for stroke prevention Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 30, 2004; 170(7): 1134 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Johnston, P. B. Fayad, P. B. Gorelick, D. F. Hanley, P. Shwayder, D. van Husen, and T. Weiskopf Prevalence and knowledge of transient ischemic attack among US adults Neurology, May 13, 2003; 60(9): 1429 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Johnston Transient Ischemic Attack N. Engl. J. Med., November 21, 2002; 347(21): 1687 - 1692. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hollander, M.L. Bots, A. I. del Sol, P.J. Koudstaal, J.C.M. Witteman, D.E. Grobbee, A. Hofman, and M.M.B. Breteler Carotid Plaques Increase the Risk of Stroke and Subtypes of Cerebral Infarction in Asymptomatic Elderly: The Rotterdam Study Circulation, June 18, 2002; 105(24): 2872 - 2877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Voko, M. L. Bots, A. Hofman, P. J. Koudstaal, J. C. M. Witteman, and M. M. B. Breteler J-Shaped Relation Between Blood Pressure and Stroke in Treated Hypertensives Hypertension, December 1, 1999; 34(6): 1181 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |