| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1997;28:1189-1194.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research (J.H., J.W., O.W., I.W.) and the Division of Cardiology (H.E.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; and the Thorax Center, Erasmus University Dijkzigt Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (P.J. de F.).
Correspondence to Inger Wendelhag, Wallenberg Laboratory-Fack 16, Sahlgrenska Hospital, S-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden. E-mail inger.wendelhag{at}wlab.wall.gu.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Patients (n=32) with at least two coronary segments with visible signs of atherosclerosis as defined in a computer-assisted analysis of coronary angiograms were also examined with B-mode ultrasound. The extent of coronary atherosclerosis was expressed as the average diameter stenosis of coronary segments, and peripheral atherosclerosis was defined as intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque occurrence in the common carotid artery, the carotid bulb, and the common femoral artery.
Results The results showed a significant correlation between the ultrasound measurement of IMT of the carotid bulb and diameter stenosis of the included coronary segments (r=.68, P=.01) and of carotid plaques and diameter stenosis (P<.001). The correlation between common carotid IMT and diameter stenosis of included coronary segments was not statistically significant (r=.31, NS). There were no significant relationships between common femoral IMT or femoral plaques and diameter stenosis of included coronary segments.
Conclusions Although this study is small, it points to a very important aspect of ultrasound measurements of atherosclerosis: measurements performed in the common carotid artery or the femoral artery may not relate to coronary atherosclerosis in the same way as measurements performed in the carotid bulb. The findings underline the importance of measuring IMT not only in the common carotid artery but also in the carotid bulb and present data separately. These results have to be confirmed in a larger-scale study.
Key Words: angiography carotid artery disease coronary artery disease ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some studies regarding the association between ultrasound variables and coronary artery disease have also been published.10 11 12 13 14 These studies showed a varying degree of correlation between carotid IMT and coronary artery disease. None of these studies have, however, compared coronary atherosclerosis with IMT measurements of the carotid bulb, a segment of the carotid vessel that may be more like the coronary arteries in terms of hemodynamic properties.15 The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between coronary atherosclerosis as measured by quantitative angiography and peripheral atherosclerosis as measured by B-mode ultrasound in three different arterial regions: the common carotid artery, the carotid artery bulb, and the common femoral artery.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean value for total cholesterol for the patients included in the present analyses when recruited to the MAAS study was 6.33±0.98 mmol/L; body height and weight were 173±7 cm and 77.8±12.9 kg, respectively; and body mass index was 25.9±3 kg/m2. At the time of the 4-year examination, there were 9 patients (28%) that had never smoked, 20 patients (63%) who were past smokers, and 3 patients (9%) who were current smokers. Eight patients had had a myocardial infarction, but none had had a stroke.
Lipid Analysis
Analyses of total cholesterol, HDL
cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were made
using standardized methods at the MAAS-lipid reference laboratory in
Rotterdam, The Netherlands.16
Ultrasonography
Examination was performed with an ultrasound scanner (Acuson
128) equipped with a 7-MHz linear transducer and a transducer aperture
of 38 mm. The electrocardiographic signal (lead II) was
simultaneously recorded to synchronize the image
capture to the top of the R wave to minimize variability during the
cardiac cycle.18
The right carotid artery was scanned at the level of the bifurcation, as described earlier in detail.19 The examination included approximately 2 cm of the common carotid artery, the carotid bulb, and 1 cm of the internal and external arteries. The right femoral artery was examined distal to the inguinal ligament at the site where the artery divides into the superficial femoral artery and the profound femoral artery. The femoral artery was scanned approximately 4 cm proximal and 1 cm distal to the flow divider. These regions were scanned longitudinally and transversely to assess the occurrence of plaques. If a plaque was present, a frozen B-mode image of the thickest part of the plaque in the longitudinal view was recorded on videotape. The procedure was repeated three times to achieve three separate images for analysis. A short sequence of real-time images was also recorded to assist in the interpretation of the frozen images. Pulsed Doppler was used to provide information on velocity of blood flow.
Images for IMT measurements were recorded from the carotid bulb, the common carotid artery and the common femoral artery, respectively. IMT measurements were not performed in the internal carotid artery because of the high percentage of missing images from this area.20 21 At the position of the thickest part of the far wall (visually judged), a frozen longitudinal image was captured and recorded on videotape. The procedure was repeated three times to achieve three separate images for analysis. Again, a short sequence of real-time images was recorded on videotape to assist in the interpretation of the frozen images.
Measurement of IMT
The ultrasound images from the videotape were analyzed
in a computerized analyzing system.22 IMT was defined as
the distance from the leading edge of the lumen-intima interface to the
leading edge of the media-adventitia interface of the far wall. The
measurement of IMT in the carotid artery was made along a 10-mm-long
section in the common carotid artery and in the carotid bulb. About 10
boundary points were marked along each echo interface by use of a
digitizer table and a mouse. Between these marked points, the echo
interfaces were interpolated by the computer so that 100 boundary
points were analyzed for each 10-mm section. The computer
program calculated the average thickness along the 10-mm-long section
(IMTmean) and also the maximum thickness of the
analyzed section (IMTmax). Measurements in the
common femoral artery were made in the same way as for the carotid
artery but along a 15-mm-long section proximal to the
bifurcation.19 The means of three separately
analyzed images in the common carotid artery, the carotid bulb,
and the common femoral artery, respectively, were used in the
analyses.
Most of the examinations were performed by the same investigator, and all analyses of IMT and plaque occurrence were made by the same observer. In a previous study of reproducibility, 17 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and 18 control subjects were examined on two different occasions within 7 to 14 days to estimate intraobserver variability. The coefficient of variation for recording and measurements in the common carotid artery was 10.6% for IMTmean and 10.4% for IMTmax. The corresponding figures for measurements in the carotid bulb were 13.2% and 17%, respectively. Measurements of IMTmean and IMTmax in the common femoral artery had coefficients of variation of 11.9% and 14.4%, respectively.19
Assessment of Plaque Occurrence
A semiquantitative subjective scale was used to grade the size
of plaques.19 This analysis included plaques in
the near and far walls of the vessel. A plaque was defined as a
distinct area with an IMT >50% thicker than neighboring sites
(visually judged).19 Grade 0 was defined as no plaque;
grade 1 as one or more small plaques (each less than approximately
10 mm2 in the carotid artery and 20
mm2 in the femoral artery); and grade 2, moderate to large
plaques. The differentiation between grades 1 and 2 was made
subjectively in most cases, and quantitative measurements were made in
the computerized analyzing system22 only when the correct
classification was not obvious to the observer. Grade 3 was defined as
large plaques that caused a hemodynamic change in blood
flow in the carotid artery, as defined by the pulsed Doppler curve,
if peak systolic velocity was >1.2 m/s at 60° Doppler
angle23 and in the femoral artery if there was a 100%
increase in peak systolic velocity at the site of the plaque in
relation to the segment proximal to the plaque concomitant with a loss
of reverse flow.24 However, in the present study, no
large plaque of grade 3 was found in the carotid artery, and only one
subject had a plaque of grade 3 in the femoral artery. Therefore,
plaques of grades 2 and 3 were merged into one group of moderate to
large plaques.
Coronary Angiography and Quantitative Analysis
Coronary angiography was performed according to
standards required for quantitative analysis,25
which have been described in detail elsewhere.16 17 The
intention was to have 9 to 10 analyzable segments: 3 proximal segments
in the right coronary artery, 3 to 4 in the circumflex, and 3
in the left anterior descending and left main stem. The angiogram was
accepted only if at least 5 segments were analyzed according to
the protocol.16 All angiograms were sent to the
angiographic reference laboratory in Rotterdam and assessed by two
members of the MAAS angiography committee, who selected the
coronary segments suitable for quantitative analysis,
irrespective of the presence of lesions. Quantitative analyses
were done by the computer-assisted CAAS system.25 Two
efficacy variables that allow measurement of absolute lumen
diameter were defined17 26 : (1) the per-patient average
mean lumen diameter of all segments included and (2) the per-patient
average minimum lumen diameter of all segments that were
angiographically diseased, defined as diameter stenosis >20%.
As a third parameter, the per-patient average of diameter
stenosis was also reported for all angiographically diseased
segments.
Statistical Analysis
All statistics were analyzed using SPSS for Windows 6.1.
Nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation test was used in
the correlation analysis, with the relationship illustrated by
Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). For comparison of
plaque occurrence in the common carotid and common femoral arteries
with angiographic variables, Mantel-Haenszel's test for linear
association was used. For comparison between groups, the Mann-Whitney
U test was used. Furthermore, a t-distributed
variable was used to calculate 95% CIs for differences. Two-sided
values of P<.05 were regarded as statistically
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IMT in Relation to Angiographic Variables
When common carotid IMT was compared with the CAAS angiographic
variables (mean lumen diameter, minimum lumen diameter, and
diameter stenosis), no significant correlations were found.
IMTmean and IMTmax measured in the carotid bulb
were, however, significantly correlated with percent diameter
stenosis of coronary segments (r=.68 and
r=.69, respectively; P=.01)
(Table
, Fig 1
). There were no significant
correlations between IMT of the femoral artery and any of the three
angiographic variables (Table
, Fig 1
).
|
|
Plaque Occurrence in Relation to Angiographic Variables
Mean and minimum lumen diameter and diameter stenosis of
coronary segments were all tested against plaque occurrence in
the carotid and the femoral arteries separately. A significant
correlation was seen between percent diameter stenosis and
plaque occurrence in the carotid artery (P<.001; Fig 2
). No significant correlation was seen between diameter
stenosis and plaque occurrence in the femoral artery (NS; Fig 2
).
|
Relationship Between IMT Measured in Different Arterial
Regions
There was no correlation between IMT measured in the two different
arteries. The relationships between IMT of the common carotid artery
and IMT of the common femoral artery was r=.08 (NS); between
the IMT of the carotid bulb and IMT of the common femoral artery, it
was r=.21 (NS). The correlation between IMT measured in two
different regions of the same artery, IMT of the common carotid artery
and IMT of the carotid bulb, was r=.35 (NS).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The value of carotid IMT as a surrogate variable for coronary artery disease has been investigated in several previous studies. Some of these studies used an IMT scoring system to evaluate the carotid arteries in patients undergoing coronary angiography. These studies reported that the extent of carotid artery disease was related to the extent of coronary artery disease.10 11 A more commonly used parameter in ultrasound studies is common carotid IMT. Good-quality images of the far wall of the straight part of the common carotid artery are easy to obtain, and IMT can be measured in nearly all subjects. However, only poor positive correlations between far-wall common carotid IMT and the extent of coronary artery disease have been observed.12 13 14 These results accord well with the findings in the present study. One recently published study showed a rather weak but statistically significant correlation between common carotid IMT and the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (r=.23 and r=.26, respectively; n=350; P<.001). The authors concluded that the relatively poor correlation should be considered in the interpretation of clinical trials that use carotid IMT as a surrogate variable for coronary atherosclerosis.14 These authors did not study the carotid bulb.
Plaque in the coronary arteries has been shown to occur more frequently at regions of flow separation and of low and oscillating shear stress.15 A similar hemodynamic situation with flow separation and low oscillating shear stress is also found in the internal carotid artery and in the carotid bulb, and the development of atherosclerosis in carotid arteries also typically begins with an increased IMT in the bifurcation area. This may explain why IMT of the carotid bulb may be more closely related to coronary artery disease than IMT of the common carotid artery.
It is interesting to note that no significant relationship was observed between coronary atherosclerosis and IMT measured in the femoral artery or between IMT of the carotid artery and IMT of the femoral artery. These results corroborate findings in an earlier study performed in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, in which no significant relationship was noted between common carotid IMT and common femoral IMT.9 One might speculate that partly different factors may be involved in regulating the development of atherosclerosis in the femoral artery compared with the factors that regulate atherosclerosis development in the carotid artery and in the coronary arteries.9 27
Coronary atherosclerosis was defined by the CAAS variables: mean lumen diameter, minimum lumen diameter, and diameter stenosis. In our study, only percent diameter stenosis turned out to be significantly correlated to ultrasound findings. Mean lumen diameter and minimum lumen diameter are both absolute measurements. Diameter stenosis, on the other hand, is dependent on a relative diameter, which is determined by comparing the diameter at the site of maximal reduction with the diameter in adjacent areas that appear to be either normal or only minimally diseased. One problem is that this "normal" portion of the vessel could be atheromatous in a diffuse manner, leading to calculation of a less severe lesion.26 Nevertheless, one might speculate that diameter stenosis, being a relative measure, better mirrors wall thickness than mean lumen diameter and minimum lumen diameter in the type of cross-sectional study that we have performed. In prospective studies, on the other hand, in which each patient serves as his or her own control, the other variables are of great value.
One of the limitations when comparing the degree of atherosclerosis in peripheral and coronary arteries is that different methods are used. In ultrasound studies of carotid arteries, IMT is the main variable studied, whereas with coronary angiography, residual lumen or relative stenosis is measured and not wall thickness. According to findings presented by Glagov et al,15 large increases in wall thickness due to atherosclerosis may be seen both in carotid and coronary arteries before a decrease in lumen diameter and stenosis development occurs. Therefore, it is to be expected that ultrasound and coronary angiography will yield different findings during the early development of atherosclerosis. Another problem is that coronary angiography cannot be performed in healthy subjects for ethical reasons, which limits the study population to subjects who undergo coronary angiography for medical reasons.
A subsequent question is whether the relationship would be better if intracoronary ultrasound were used to define coronary atherosclerosis. Intracoronary ultrasound and noninvasive ultrasound of carotid and femoral arteries, in addition to lumen diameter, both measure IMT. Therefore, in future studies, it would be of interest to compare findings from external ultrasound of carotid and femoral arteries with intravascular ultrasound from coronary arteries.
In conclusion, our study showed an association between IMT measured in the carotid bulb and coronary atherosclerosis. However, an association was not seen between IMT in the common carotid artery and coronary atherosclerosis or between the common femoral artery IMT and coronary atherosclerosis. These findings underline the importance of measuring IMT not only in the common carotid artery but also in the carotid bulb and presenting the results separately for these two arterial segments.28 Although this study is small, it used refined, computerized, quantitative techniques, both for ultrasound measurement of IMT and for angiographic measurement of coronary atherosclerosis. The results point to a very important aspect of ultrasound measurement of atherosclerosis: measurements performed in the common carotid artery or the femoral artery may not relate to coronary atherosclerosis in the same way as measurements performed in the carotid bulb. These results have to be confirmed in a larger-scale study.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 17, 1996; revision received March 3, 1997; accepted March 21, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. G. Frontini, S. R. Srinivasan, J. Xu, R. Tang, M. G. Bond, and G. S. Berenson Usefulness of Childhood Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Versus Other Lipoprotein Measures in Predicting Adult Subclinical Atherosclerosis: The Bogalusa Heart Study Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): 924 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Rundek, H. Arif, B. Boden-Albala, M. S. Elkind, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco Carotid plaque, a subclinical precursor of vascular events: The Northern Manhattan Study Neurology, April 1, 2008; 70(14): 1200 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Amato, P. Montorsi, A. Ravani, E. Oldani, S. Galli, P. M. Ravagnani, E. Tremoli, and D. Baldassarre Carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis: correlation with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary intravascular ultrasound findings Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2007; 28(17): 2094 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Bots, D. Baldassarre, A. Simon, E. de Groot, D. H. O'Leary, W. Riley, J. J. Kastelein, and D. E. Grobbee Carotid intima-media thickness and coronary atherosclerosis: weak or strong relations? Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2007; 28(4): 398 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tivesten, J. Hulthe, K. Wallenfeldt, J. Wikstrand, C. Ohlsson, and B. Fagerberg Circulating Estradiol Is an Independent Predictor of Progression of Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness in Middle-Aged Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4433 - 4437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kanadasi, M. Cayli, M. San, K. Aikimbaev, C. C. Alhan, M. Demir, and M. Demirtas The Presence of a Calcific Plaque in the Common Carotid Artery as a Predictor of Coronary Atherosclerosis Angiology, October 1, 2006; 57(5): 585 - 592. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yokoyama, N. Katakami, and Y. Yamasaki Recent Advances of Intervention to Inhibit Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2420 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kafetzakis, G. Kochiadakis, A. Laliotis, I. Peteinarakis, E. Touloupakis, N. Igoumenidis, and A. Katsamouris Association of Subclinical Wall Changes of Carotid, Femoral, and Popliteal Arteries With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2538 - 2543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hallerstam, P. T. Larsson, E. Zuber, and S. Rosfors Carotid Atherosclerosis is Correlated with Extent and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease Evaluated by Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Angiology, May 1, 2004; 55(3): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Bots, G. W. Evans, W. A. Riley, and D. E. Grobbee Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Intervention Studies: Design Options, Progression Rates, and Sample Size Considerations: A Point of View Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2985 - 2994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Li, W. Chen, S. R. Srinivasan, M. G. Bond, R. Tang, E. M. Urbina, and G. S. Berenson Childhood Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Carotid Vascular Changes in Adulthood: The Bogalusa Heart Study JAMA, November 5, 2003; 290(17): 2271 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-A. JANSSON, F. PELLME, A. HAMMARSTEDT, M. SANDQVIST, H. BREKKE, K. CAIDAHL, M. FORSBERG, R. VOLKMANN, E. CARVALHO, T. FUNAHASHI, et al. A novel cellular marker of insulin resistance and early atherosclerosis in humans is related to impaired fat cell differentiation and low adiponectin FASEB J, August 1, 2003; 17(11): 1434 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Liuba, J. Persson, J. Luoma, S. Yla-Herttuala, and E. Pesonen Acute infections in children are accompanied by oxidative modification of LDL and decrease of HDL cholesterol, and are followed by thickening of carotid intima-media Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2003; 24(6): 515 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Gianaros, M. E. Bleil, M. F. Muldoon, J.R. Jennings, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, J. M. McCaffery, and S. B. Manuck Is Cardiovascular Reactivity Associated With Atherosclerosis Among Hypertensives? Hypertension, November 1, 2002; 40(5): 742 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Raso, N. M. van Popele, M. A. D. H. Schalekamp, and T. J. M. van der Cammen Intima-Media Thickness of the Common Carotid Arteries Is Related to Coronary Atherosclerosis and left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Older Adults Angiology, September 1, 2002; 53(5): 569 - 574. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hulthe and B. Fagerberg Circulating Oxidized LDL Is Associated With Subclinical Atherosclerosis Development and Inflammatory Cytokines (AIR Study) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2002; 22(7): 1162 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.H.F. Rudd, E.A. Warburton, T.D. Fryer, H.A. Jones, J.C. Clark, N. Antoun, P. Johnstrom, A.P. Davenport, P.J. Kirkpatrick, B.N. Arch, et al. Imaging Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation With [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Circulation, June 11, 2002; 105(23): 2708 - 2711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T.P. Keulen, M. Kruijshoop, N. C. Schaper, A. P.G. Hoeks, and T. W.A. de Bruin Increased Intima-Media Thickness in Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia Associated With Apolipoprotein B Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2002; 22(2): 283 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Wiklund, J. Hulthe, J. Wikstrand, C. Schmidt, S.-O. Olofsson, and G. Bondjers Effect of Controlled Release/Extended Release Metoprolol on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: A 3-Year Randomized Study Stroke, February 1, 2002; 33(2): 572 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Marx, T.W. Jax, G. Plehn, C.M. Schannwell, M. Horlitz, R.M. Klein, H. Lapp, and H. Gulker Morphological differences of the internal thoracic artery in patients with and without coronary artery disease - evaluation by duplex-scanning Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 755 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Morrisett and W. Insull Jr Evaluating Atherosclerotic Lesions by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Dimensional to Compositional Quantitation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2001; 21(10): 1563 - 1564. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hulthe, O. Wiklund, E. Hurt-Camejo, and G. Bondjers Antibodies to Oxidized LDL in Relation to Carotid Atherosclerosis, Cell Adhesion Molecules, and Phospholipase A2 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2001; 21(2): 269 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hulthe, L. Bokemark, and B. Fagerberg Antibodies to Oxidized LDL in Relation to Intima-Media Thickness in Carotid and Femoral Arteries in 58-Year-Old Subjectively Clinically Healthy Men Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2001; 21(1): 101 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hulthe, L. Bokemark, J. Wikstrand, and B. Fagerberg The Metabolic Syndrome, LDL Particle Size, and Atherosclerosis : The Atherosclerosis and Insulin Resistance (AIR) Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2000; 20(9): 2140 - 2147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schmidt, J. Hulthe, J. Wikstrand, H. Gnarpe, J. Gnarpe, S. Agewall, and B. Fagerberg Chlamydia pneumoniae Seropositivity Is Associated With Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness Stroke, July 1, 2000; 31(7): 1526 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zureik, P. Ducimetiere, P.-J. Touboul, D. Courbon, C. Bonithon-Kopp, C. Berr, and C. Magne Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Predicts Occurrence of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques : Longitudinal Results From the Aging Vascular Study (EVA) Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2000; 20(6): 1622 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Espeland, R. Tang, J. G. Terry, D. H. Davis, M. Mercuri, and J. R. Crouse III Associations of Risk Factors With Segment-Specific Intimal-Medial Thickness of the Extracranial Carotid Artery Stroke, May 1, 1999; 30(5): 1047 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||