(Stroke. 1997;28:1601-1606.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Neurology, Leicester Royal Infirmary (A.R.K., R.J.A.); Department of Neurology, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool (P.J.M.); and Department of Academic Radiology, University of Nottingham (A.R.M.) (UK).
Correspondence to A.R. Kenton, MRCP, Department of Neurology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Forty-four patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke were studied with both TCCS and MRA within 24 hours of stroke onset. The appearances of all vessels identified on MRA were divided into three categories: normal, attenuated, and absent vessels. The basal cerebral arteries were identified with the use of TCCS, and their velocities were measured with pulsed-wave Doppler. The side-to-side asymmetry was calculated and expressed as an asymmetry index.
Results Five patients could not be studied with TCCS because of lack of a suitable acoustic window. An additional 4 patients were too restless to tolerate MRA scanning. Three patients had intracerebral hemorrhages, 2 patients had intracerebral gliomas, and the remaining 30 patients had cerebral infarctions. In the group of patients with acute cerebral infarction, TCCS identified 10 patients with normal asymmetry indices, 1 patient with an increased asymmetry index, 9 patients with decreased asymmetry indices, and 10 patients with occlusion of the symptomatic middle cerebral artery (MCA). MRA identified 8 normal angiograms, 6 patients had attenuated MCA branch vessels, 4 patients had MCA branch occlusions, 2 angiograms demonstrated MCA main stem attenuation, and 10 angiograms showed MCA occlusion.
Conclusions TCCS and MRA are both noninvasive techniques that can be used to study the acute stroke patient. They both yield information regarding the pathophysiology of acute stroke and may be useful techniques in deciding on therapeutic interventions. The findings agree closely with each other, and these techniques may be useful in the long-term follow-up of stroke patients.
Key Words: cerebral infarction magnetic resonance angiography stroke, acute ultrasonics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MRA is another noninvasive technique that has been used to visualize the circle of Willis in acute stroke.10 It has been used in imaging the carotid vessels in the assessment of carotid stenosis11 and also to visualize the intracranial vasculature in cases of arteriovenous malformations,12 aneurysms,13 and venous thrombosis.14 MRA has been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting intracranial abnormalities compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.15
Many new therapeutic interventions, such as thrombolysis, must be administered within a short time after the onset of symptoms. While novel imaging techniques may provide important information regarding the cerebral circulation, these must be readily available and rapidly acquired. Additionally, monitoring of response to such intervention is not always possible with MRI scanning, even in the setting of a large city hospital, because of scanner availability.
We studied 44 patients who presented with an acute stroke syndrome with both TCCS and MRA within 24 hours of stroke onset. The aims of the study were to assess the practicality of using these techniques in the setting of acute stroke and to assess the agreement between them. In addition, it was hypothesized that if TCCS and MRA yielded similar results, then TCCS may be used to monitor the cerebral circulation in stroke patients who have undergone an initial comprehensive MR examination, since it is relatively inexpensive and may be used at the bedside.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TCCS was performed with the use of a 2.25-MHz curved phase array probe
(Diasonics). The transtemporal acoustic window was used to
visualize the basal cerebral arteries. The vessels were then
interrogated with the use of pulsed-wave Doppler and the velocities
measured from the spectral display. The side-to-side difference in
blood flow velocity (AI) was calculated according to the formula
proposed by Zanette et al9 :
![]() |
An occluded vessel was inferred by lack of signal on the color display despite visualization of at least two other vessels and lack of any signal when interrogated with pulsed-wave Doppler. The mean time from symptom onset to TCCS was 15.4 hours (range, 4 to 24 hours). TCCS was performed within 4 hours of MRA (range, 15 minutes to 4 hours; median, 2 hours).
MRA was performed on a 1-T Magnetom system (Siemens) with the use of a circularly polarized transmit-receive head coil with 26-cm inner diameter. Three-dimensional time of flight images were obtained with the use of a fast imaging with steady state free precession three-dimensional sequence, in the majority of cases with the use of magnetization transfer and tilted optimized nonrandom excitation to improve contrast between flowing blood and background tissue (repetition time, 36 ms; echo time, 10 ms; flip angle, 20°; acquisition, 1; field of view, 230x230; matrix 256x256; slab thickness, 50 mm; time of acquisition, 9 minutes, 52 seconds. With the use of magnetization transfer contrast and tilted optimized nonrandom excitation, a 192x256 matrix in conjunction with a repetition time of 42 ms gave a total acquisition time of 8 minutes, 30 seconds). During postprocessing, MIP was used to produce angiographic-like images. These were viewed in 12 projections rotated about a side-to-side axis through the imaging volume. The source data and targeted MIPs were used if there were equivocal results from the full MIP data set. The vessels were classified into three groups according to their MRA appearances: normal, attenuated, and absent. MRA was performed with the investigators blinded to the results of the clinical examination and TCCS. TCCS was performed with the investigators blinded to the results of MRA and MRI but not to the clinical state of the patient (the same investigator [A.R.K.] performed both the TCCS and the clinical examination).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty-six patients were diagnosed as having a cerebral infarction on MRI, and in 4 patients who had a normal MRI, the diagnosis was made on clinical grounds after other causes had been excluded.
A summary of the results is presented in Table 1
.
|
Of the patients presenting with acute cerebral infarction, 10 were found to have normal AIs in the MCA (ie, ±20%). Average mean MCA blood flow velocities were 53.4 cm/s (range, 34.0 to 88.8 cm/s) in the symptomatic vessel and 55.5 cm/s (range, 35.6 to 88.6 cm/s) in the asymptomatic vessel. There was no significant difference between these velocities. Eight of these patients had normal MRA scans. T2-weighted MRI scans of these 8 patients were normal in 2 patients, revealed scattered high-signal areas (indicative of small-vessel disease) in 2 patients, revealed a small high-signal area in the internal capsule in 2 patients, and revealed a small high-signal area in the parietal lobe in 2 patients. MRA in the remaining 2 patients with a normal AI revealed MCA branch vessel attenuation on the symptomatic side; T2-weighted MRI was normal in 1 patient and revealed small-vessel disease in the other patient.
In 10 patients no color-coded or spectral Doppler signal could be
detected from the MCA despite obtaining adequate signals from both the
ACA and PCA (Fig 1a
). Main stem MCA
occlusion was therefore diagnosed. The AI of all these patients was
-200%. The average mean MCA velocity in the asymptomatic
vessel was 41.1 cm/s (range, 34.3 to 48.4 cm/s). All 10 patients had
absent MCAs on the symptomatic side on MRA (Fig 1b
). In
addition, 1 patient had an occlusion of the ipsilateral ICA (tandem
lesion), confirmed by color-coded duplex ultrasonography. In 7 of the
patients with MCA occlusion, velocities in the symptomatic
ACA were significantly greater than the contralateral hemisphere (AI
>+27%).2 MRA failed to show any differences between the
ACAs in these patients. T2-weighted MRI scans revealed large MCA
territory infarctions in 8 patients (Fig 1c
), a basal ganglia
infarction in 1 patient, and scattered high signal areas in 1
patient.
|
Nine patients were found on TCCS to have a reduced AI (range, -20.1%
to -78.9%; mean, -44.8%) (Fig 2a
).
The average MCA velocity was 30.5 cm/s (range, 21.1 to 44.2 cm/s) on
the symptomatic side and 48.5 cm/s (range, 30.5 to 69.4
cm/s) on the asymptomatic side; the difference in the
average velocity in the two groups was statistically significant
(P<.006, Student's t test). MRA revealed 2
patients to have marked attenuation of the proximal segment of the MCA,
and MRI scans showed a parietal lobe infarction in 1 patient and a
haemorrhagic parietal lobe infarction in the other. Four patients had
evidence of M2 branch vessel occlusion on the symptomatic
side (Fig 2b
). One patient also had an occluded ICA diagnosed by
color-coded duplex ultrasonography, and TCCS showed retrograde filling
of the ipsilateral ACA combined with a high flow velocity in the
anterior communicating artery, indicating interhemispheric collateral
flow. MRI scans showed high signal areas consistent with
infarction in MCA branch vessel territory in all patients (Fig 2
c). The remaining 3 patients with a reduced AI had M2 branch vessel
attenuation on MRA; MRI was normal in 1 patient and showed evidence of
a small parietal lobe and basal ganglia infarction in 2 patients.
|
One patient presented with a high AI (+62.4%); mean MCA velocity was 55.4 cm/s. MRA indicated MCA branch attenuation on the symptomatic hemisphere, and MRI revealed a parietal lobe infarction.
The average mean symptomatic MCA velocity in all patients
with an abnormal MRA was significantly lower (P<.02,
Student's t test) than that of patients with a normal MRA
(Table 2
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conventional TCD and MRA have both been shown to have a high specificity and sensitivity compared with conventional angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with cerebrovascular disorders.2 20 21 22 In a previous report23 it was shown that the combination of TCD and MRA was more reliable in identifying MCA stenoses than digital subtraction angiography alone. At this time there have been no reported studies comparing TCCS with MRA or conventional angiography in acute stroke in adults. We did not use standard angiography in this study because it was thought not to be ethically justified because of the associated mortality and morbidity. Thus, there is no gold standard as such, and therefore it is not possible to state which imaging technique gave the "correct" result when the two methods produced different results.
It is not always possible to visualize the M2 branches of the MCA using TCCS. This is due to the slower flow in these branches compared with the M1 portion and possibly due to the increased angle that the branches subtend to the ultrasound probe. Therefore, since it is not usually known exactly how many M2 branches there are, it is not possible to make a certain diagnosis of M2 branch occlusion with TCCS. A previous study comparing TCD and intra-arterial angiography showed that multiple branch occlusion was associated with a low AI.9 This was confirmed in our study, in which all 4 patients with branch occlusion had low AI's. In addition, these patients had low absolute MCA velocities in the symptomatic hemisphere.
There was exact agreement between the two techniques for diagnosing MCA main stem occlusion. However, this finding can only be reported with confidence with TCCS if the other vessels can be clearly identified. Otherwise, failure to identify the MCA may be a result of poor ultrasound penetration. This highlights another area in which TCCS is superior to conventional TCD: with the B-mode facility and color-coding of TCCS, the major vessels can usually be identified rapidly and with more certainty than with TCD, and therefore the lack of an MCA signal is apparent immediately. This reduces the lengthy "search" required with TCD to image the ACA and PCA to make a definite diagnosis of MCA occlusion. An associated finding in acute MCA occlusion is elevated blood flow velocity in the ipsilateral ACA. This is due to a shunting of blood from the occluded MCA to the patent ACA and has been reported in previous studies.4 9 24 This finding was present in 7 of our patients with MCA main stem occlusion.
In our study group many of the patients were restless after the event, and the quality of the MRA was consequently reduced. This can make interpretation of the finer branches of the MCA difficult and may lead to an overestimation of the number of attenuated MCA branch vessels present. In addition, some patients with acute stroke have very low absolute MCA velocities, and this may give rise to reduced flow-related enhancement with this time-of-flight technique and thus an overestimation of the number of MCA branch occlusions.
Although MRA in this study was able to provide detailed anatomic information, it did not provide any quantitative data regarding blood flow velocity. The use of phase contrast techniques25 may, however, provide flow information that not only relates to the direction of flow but may also provide true quantitative flow velocity data.
There was a significant difference between the mean MCA velocities in
the patients with normal MR angiograms and the 12 patients with
attenuated or occluded MCA branch vessels on MRA (Table 2
). Eight of
these 12 patients had a mean MCA velocity outside the normal reference
range (ie, <40 cm/s). The lower velocities in patients with an
abnormal MRA probably reflected the presence of distal flow
disturbances in the MCA. The mean MCA velocity in patients with
a normal MRA was 56.4 cm/s, and none of these patients had a mean MCA
velocity under 40 cm/s. The value of 56.4 cm/s agrees closely with
reference data for healthy subjects older than 60 years (mean MCA
velocity, 58 cm/s; 95% confidence interval, 55 to 61
cm/s).17 All patients with a normal MRA had either a
hemiparesis or a facial palsy, and none had evidence of higher cortical
dysfunction. The normal MCA velocities recorded in this group are
in keeping with the presumed small-vessel pathology underlying such
lacunar infarctions26 and agree with previous
studies.27
By using the threshold value of 40 cm/s for the lower end of the normal range for mean MCA velocity, it was possible to identify 8 of the 12 patients with an abnormal MRA (excluding proximal MCA occlusion). This compares well with the use of the AI, which identified 9 of the 12 abnormal MRAs.
Not surprisingly, patients with MCA branch occlusions tended to present with milder neurological deficits and a correspondingly smaller area of infarction on MRI than those patients presenting with a proximal occlusion of the MCA. Nine of the 10 patients presenting with proximal MCA occlusion had severe neurological deficits, including hemiparesis, homonymous hemianopia, and, if the dominant hemisphere was affected, dysphasia. All these patients had large MCA territory infarctions on MRI. However, 1 patient (patient 2) presented with a hemiparesis and facial palsy only and was found to have an infarction in the basal ganglia. A perfusion MRI scan of this patient showed only a deficit in the basal ganglia. This implies that the MCA occlusion may have been of long duration.
TCCS is a useful tool in the assessment of the acute stroke patient. The equipment is portable and can therefore be used as a bedside investigation. This may prove advantageous in certain patient groups, such as those too ill to undergo conventional neuroimaging. TCCS can be easily repeated and may prove useful in monitoring the patient's response to therapeutic intervention. The scans can be performed rapidly: the cerebral vessels are imaged within minutes if there is an adequate acoustic window. This may have implications for the assessment of patients undergoing treatment that must be performed within a strict time limit. TCCS can be performed early in the clinical course of the stroke and, like MRA, may show flow abnormalities, the effects of which are not yet apparent on either CT or standard T1- and T2-weighted MRI. However, there is quite a substantial failure rate as a result of lack of a suitable acoustic window, especially in elderly women. This is a particular problem in cerebrovascular disease since most of the patients are elderly.
MRA is more able to demonstrate the anatomy of the circle of Willis, especially the finer branches of the basal cerebral arteries. An advantage of MRA is that it is not limited by the availability of an acoustic window, which precluded TCCS in 5 patients. However, in our study 4 patients had to be excluded because they were too restless for adequate imaging once in the MR scanner.
We have shown that both MRA and TCCS can identify proximal MCA occlusion. MRA can identify attenuation and occlusion of distal MCA branches that cannot be imaged satisfactorily with TCCS. The latter findings can be inferred if mean MCA velocity is below the threshold value of 40 cm/s or if the AI is greater than -20%. With a trend toward an increasing number of stroke patients undergoing MR imaging, the addition of MRA is a valuable tool for determining the patience of the major cerebral vessels. MRA may also be used not only in conjunction with standard T1- and T2-weighted imaging but also with the newer techniques of perfusion MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging. This combination of investigations would provide the clinician with a powerful tool for the comprehensive assessment of the stroke patient. TCCS may also be used in the acute situation, and although it does not provide the anatomic detail of MRA, it can reliably diagnose proximal MCA occlusion. In the routine clinical setting, MRA may be used as the initial imaging technique in combination with standard T2-weighted imaging to diagnose the cause of the stroke and to determine vessel patency. If MRI is contraindicated, TCCS may be used instead. If further follow-up is required, TCCS may be the technique of choice since it can be performed as a bedside test, is relatively inexpensive, and may be more accessible than MRA in major city hospitals.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received December 28, 1996; revision received March 18, 1997; accepted April 11, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Zanette EM, Roberti C, Mancini G, Pozzilli C, Bragoni
M, Toni D. Spontaneous middle cerebral artery reperfusion in
ischemic stroke: a follow-up study with
transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 1995;26:430-433.
3.
Ringelstein EB, Biniek R, Weiller C, Ammeling B, Nolte
PN, Thron A. Type and extent of hemispheric brain infarctions
and clinical outcome in early and delayed middle cerebral artery
recanalization. Neurology. 1992;42:289-298.
4.
Kaps M, Damian MS, Teschendorf U, Dorndorf W.
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound findings in middle
cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 1990;21:532-537.
5. Ni XS, Horner S, Fazekas F, Niederkorn K. Serial transcranial Doppler sonography in ischemic strokes in middle cerebral artery territory. J Neuroimaging. 1994;4:232-236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Bogdahn U, Becker G, Winkler J, Greiner K, Perez J,
Meurers B. Transcranial color-coded real-time
sonography in adults. Stroke. 1990;21:1680-1688.
7. Martin PJ, Evans DH, Naylor AR. Measurement of blood flow velocity in the basal cerebral circulation: advantages of transcranial color-coded sonography over conventional transcranial Doppler. J Clin Ultrasound. 1995;23:21-26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Rorick MB, Nichols FT, Adams RJ. Transcranial Doppler correlation with angiography in detection of intracranial stenosis. Stroke. 1994;25:1931-1934.[Abstract]
9.
Zanette EM, Fieschi C, Bozzao L, Roberti C, Toni D,
Argentino C, Lenzi GL. Comparison of cerebral angiography and
transcranial Doppler sonography in acute
stroke. Stroke. 1989;20:899-903.
10.
Warach S, Li W, Ronthal M, Edelman RR. Acute
cerebral ischemia: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR
imaging and MR angiography. Radiology. 1992;182:41-47.
11. Carriero A, Ucchino S, Magarelli N, Legnini M, Macri MA, Napolitano AM, Bonomo L. Carotid bifurcation stenosis: a comparative study between MR angiography and duplex scanning with respect to digital subtraction angiography. J Neuroradiol. 1995;22:103-111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Turski PA, Korosec FR, Graves VB, Strother CM. Vascular malformations. In: Potchen JE, Haacke EM, Siebert JE, Gottschalk A, eds. Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Concepts and Applications. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1993:380-404.
13.
Huston J, Rufenacht DA, Ehman RL, Wiebers DO.
Intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations: comparison
of time-of-flight and phase-contrast angiography.
Radiology. 1991;181:721-730.
14. Padayachee TS, Bingham JB, Graves MJ, Colchester ACF, Cox TCS. Dural sinus thrombosis: diagnosis and follow up by magnetic resonance angiography and imaging. Neuroradiology. 1991;33:165-167.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Riles TS, Eidelman EM, Litt AW, Pinto RS, Oldford
F, Schwartzenberg GW. Comparison of magnetic resonance
angiography, conventional angiography, and duplex scanning.
Stroke. 1992;23:341-346.
16. Martin PJ. Evaluation and Application of Transcranial Colour-Coded Sonography. Leicester, UK: Leicester University; 1994. Thesis.
17. Martin PJ, Evans DH, Naylor AR. Transcranial color-coded sonography of the basal cerebral circulation: reference data from 115 volunteers. Stroke. 1994;25:390-396.[Abstract]
18. Wada T, Kodaira K, Fujishiro K, Maie KI, Tsukiyama E, Mikawa H, Shimuzu H, Fukumoto T, Okamura T. Quantitative measurement of middle cerebral artery flow velocity using transcranial Doppler sonography. Arters et Veines. 1990;9:682-685.
19. von Reutern GM, von Budingen HJ. Doppler examination of the basal cerebral arteries (transcranial or intracranial sonography). In: Ultrasound Diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Disease. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1993:176-248.
20.
Stock KW, Radue EW, Jacob AL, Bao XS, Steinbrich
W. Intracranial arteries: prospective blinded comparative study
of MR angiography and DSA in 50 patients. Radiology. 1995;195:451-456.
21. Dagirmanjian A, Ross JS, Obuchowski N, Lewin JS, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, Masaryk TJ. High resolution, magnetization transfer saturation, variable flip angle, time-of-flight MRA in the detection of intracranial vascular stenoses. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:700-706.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Camerlingo M, Casto L, Censori B, Ferraro B, Gazzaniga GC, Mamoli A. Transcranial Doppler in acute ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery territories. Acta Neurol Scand. 1993;88:108-111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Rother J, Schwartz A, Wentz KU, Rautenberg W, Hennerici M. Middle cerebral artery stenosis: assessment by magnetic resonance angiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Cerebrovasc Dis.. 1994;4:273-279.
24. Mattle HP, Grolimund P, Huber P, Sturzenegger M, Zurbrugg HR. Transcranial Doppler sonographic findings in middle cerebral artery disease. Ann Neurol. 1988;45:289-295.
25. Dumoulin C, Souza S, Walker M, Wagle W. Three-dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1989;9:139-149.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Horowitz DR, Tuhrim S, Weinberger JM, Rudolph
SH. Mechanisms in lacunar infarction. Stroke. 1992;23:325-327.
27. Naylor AR, Sandercock PAG, Sellar RJ, Warlow CP. Patterns of vascular pathology in acute, first-ever cerebral infarction. Scott Med J. 1993;38:41-44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Nedelmann, E. Stolz, T. Gerriets, R. W. Baumgartner, G. Malferrari, G. Seidel, M. Kaps, and for the TCCS Consensus Group Consensus Recommendations for Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography for the Assessment of Intracranial Arteries in Clinical Trials on Acute Stroke Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3238 - 3244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Eggers, I. R. Konig, B. Koch, G. Handler, and G. Seidel Sonothrombolysis With Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography and Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Main Stem Occlusion: Results From a Randomized Study Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1470 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kunz, G. Hahn, D. Mucha, A. Muller, K.M. Barrett, R. von Kummer, and G. Gahn Echo-Enhanced Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography in the Diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Events: A Validation Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2122 - 2127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-C. Tang, J.-S. Jeng, P.-K. Yip, C.-J. Lu, B.-S. Hwang, W.-H. Lin, and H.-M. Liu Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography for the Detection of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 451 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Gerriets, M Goertler, E Stolz, T Postert, U Sliwka, F Schlachetzki, G Seidel, S Weber, and M Kaps Feasibility and validity of transcranial duplex sonography in patients with acute stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2002; 73(1): 17 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Akopov and G.T. Whitman Hemodynamic Studies in Early Ischemic Stroke: Serial Transcranial Doppler and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Evaluation Stroke, May 1, 2002; 33(5): 1274 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Klotzsch, A. Bozzato, G. Lammers, M. Mull, and J. Noth Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography of Intracranial Stenoses AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 208 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gerriets, E. Stolz, S. Konig, S. Babacan, I. Fiss, M. Jauss, and M. Kaps Sonographic Monitoring of Midline Shift in Space-Occupying Stroke : An Early Outcome Predictor Stroke, February 1, 2001; 32(2): 442 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gerriets, T. Postert, M. Goertler, E. Stolz, F. Schlachetzki, U. Sliwka, G. Seidel, S. Weber, and M. Kaps DIAS I: Duplex-Sonographic Assessment of the Cerebrovascular Status in Acute Stroke : A Useful Tool for Future Stroke Trials Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2342 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Postert, B. Braun, S. Meves, O. Koster, H. Przuntek, S. Weber, and T. Buttner Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography in Acute Hemispheric Brain Infarction Stroke, September 1, 1999; 30 (9): e1819 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Alexandrov, A. M. Demchuk, T. H. Wein, and J. C. Grotta Yield of Transcranial Doppler in Acute Cerebral Ischemia Stroke, August 1, 1999; 30(8): 1604 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gerriets, G. Seidel, I. Fiss, B. Modrau, and M. Kaps Contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded duplex sonography: Efficiency and validity Neurology, April 1, 1999; 52(6): 1133 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gerriets, E. Stolz, B. Modrau, I. Fiss, G. Seidel, and M. Kaps Sonographic monitoring of midline shift in hemispheric infarctions Neurology, January 1, 1999; 52(1): 45 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maurer, S. Shambal, D. Berg, M. Woydt, E. Hofmann, D. Georgiadis, A. Lindner, and G. Becker Differentiation Between Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Ischemic Stroke by Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex-Sonography Stroke, December 1, 1998; 29(12): 2563 - 2567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Goertler, R. Kross, M. Baeumer, S. Jost, R. Grote, S. Weber, and C.-W. Wallesch Diagnostic Impact and Prognostic Relevance of Early Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography in Acute Stroke Stroke, May 1, 1998; 29(5): 955 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |