(Stroke. 1997;28:1671-1676.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the University Division of Medicine for the Elderly, The Glenfield Hospital, and the University Division of Medical Physics, Leicester Royal Infirmary (R.P.), Leicester, UK.
Correspondence to Dr T.G. Robinson, Department of Medicine, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Rd, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods Thirty-seven acute stroke patients underwent simultaneous surface electrocardiographic and noninvasive beat-to-beat BP recording. Cardiac BRS was assessed by power spectral analysis techniques, and sympathovagal balance was determined from the ratio of the low- to high-frequency powers for pulse interval variability. The responses were compared with a control group matched for age, sex, and BP.
Results Median cardiac BRS was significantly lower in
stroke patients than in control subjects (high-frequency
-index,
4.89 versus 6.50 ms/mm Hg; P=.007; combined
-index, 4.65
versus 5.46 ms/mm Hg; P=.02). Median normalized high- but
not low-frequency power of systolic BP variability was
significantly greater in stroke patients (11.0 versus 6.7 normalized
units; P<.001), probably reflecting differences in the
mechanical effects of respiration on BP in stroke patients. No
significant differences were observed in the power spectrum of pulse
interval variability between stroke patients and control subjects.
Patients with right hemisphere strokes, however, had a significant
reduction in median high-frequency pulse interval power compared with
patients with left hemisphere strokes (8 versus 20 normalized units;
P=.03), which may reflect a change in sympathovagal balance
in favor of increased sympathetic tone in this group.
Conclusions The impairment of cardiac BRS may be important in explaining the increased BP variability after stroke. There was no significant difference in surrogate measures of sympathovagal activity between acute stroke patients and control subjects, but right hemisphere stroke patients had a significant alteration in the sympathovagal balance of pulse interval variability compared with left hemisphere stroke patients. This sympathetic predominance in right hemisphere strokes may be important in the development of cardiac arrhythmias after stroke. The prognostic implications of these findings need to be further explored.
Key Words: baroreflex blood pressure stroke, acute
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date, evidence of impaired cardiac BRS in stroke is limited to animal models8 9 and to patients with chronic disease as determined by invasive methodology.10 11 However, previous work in our department has shown an increase in short-term (beat-to-beat) systolic BP variability independent of the underlying BP level in acute stroke patients compared with control subjects matched with respect to age and sex.12 This may reflect impaired cardiac BRS, since BP variability is inversely related to BRS,13 14 15 or may be related to alterations in the vascular-baroreceptor reflex mediated by centrally induced changes in sympathetic nervous system activity.
The advent of newer, reliable, noninvasive techniques of beat-to-beat
BP measurement16 17 18 19 together with the increased
availability of powerful microcomputers and appropriate
analysis techniques has made possible the calculation of
cardiac BRS from the assessment of continuous BP and PI
recordings taken at rest. BP and PI variability can be
described in terms of the underlying rhythmic factors affecting the
cardiovascular system, including the cardiac cycle, the
respiratory cycle, and vasomotor activity.20 The technique
of PSA with the use of FFT can be used to detect such underlying
rhythmicity by assessing the number, frequency, and amplitude of the
oscillatory components.21 Cardiac BRS can be estimated by
calculation of the square root of the ratio of the powers of PI to SBP,
the
-index, which has been shown to correlate well with cardiac BRS
calculated by means of the "gold standard" pharmacological
techniques.22 23 Furthermore, the powers of various
components of the decomposed spectra of BP and PI variability can be
compared and allow an assessment of the integrity of the underlying
sympathovagal balance of autonomic cardiovascular
system control.20 24 25
The aim of this study was to use these novel noninvasive techniques to assess the effects of acute stroke on cardiac BRS compared with an appropriately matched control population. In addition, it was proposed to indirectly assess the potential integrity of underlying parasympathetic and sympathetic neural cardiovascular control with the use of PSA techniques after acute stroke, and in particular to compare patients with right and left hemisphere strokes given reports of the laterality of cardiovascular control.26 27 28 29
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
160 mm Hg and/or DBP
90 mm Hg
before stroke onset or history of antihypertensive therapy. However,
those patients requiring the continuation of antihypertensive therapy
or any treatment with effects on cardiovascular or
autonomic function were excluded. Unconscious patients and those with
atrial fibrillation or neurological signs lasting <24 hours were also
excluded, as were patients with a past medical history or evidence at
the time of study of diabetes mellitus, impaired renal function
(creatinine >200 µmol/L), ischemic
heart disease, or other conditions associated with autonomic
dysfunction. Thirty-seven control subjects matched with respect to age and sex (18 men; mean age, 67.5 years; range, 45 to 82 years) were also studied. These subjects were recruited from among respondents to a local newspaper advertisement, as well as elective orthopedic admissions before major joint replacement surgery. However, to ensure that the study groups would also be matched for BP, a proportion of untreated hypertensive control subjects (n=11) were recruited from among outpatient subjects at two of the Leicester Teaching Hospitals and through a liaison with several large local general practices. Control subjects with known diagnoses of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, impaired renal function (creatinine >200 µmol/L), or other conditions associated with autonomic dysfunction were excluded. No subject received antihypertensive therapy or medication known to affect cardiovascular or autonomic responses.
Protocol
All stroke patients were assessed within 24 hours of stroke
onset by one of us (T.G.R.). Height (or arm span), weight, and body
mass index (weight [kilograms] divided by height [meters] squared)
were recorded. After it was determined that there was no interarm
difference in BP >10 mm Hg, casual supine BP was measured in the
hemiparetic arm on three occasions with a standard mercury
sphygmomanometer and cuff of appropriate size (diastolic
phase V), and the mean value was taken in subsequent analysis.
Control subjects were also assessed with casual BP recorded in the
nondominant arm.
Noninvasive assessments of the cardiac BRS were thereafter performed in the cardiovascular laboratory. Stroke patients were assessed within 72 hours of ictus and at the time of study were hemodynamically stable, did not require intravenous or subcutaneous fluid administration, and were not clinically or biochemically dehydrated. Control subjects were assessed on one occasion, either on the day before surgery for elective orthopedic admissions or within 2 weeks of the last assessment visit for all other control subjects.
All subjects attended the cardiovascular laboratory at least 2 hours after a light meal and had abstained from smoking, alcohol, and all caffeinated products for at least 12 hours. The investigations took place in a quiet room (ambient temperature, 20°C to 24°C), and the subjects were asked to micturate before the study. The subject was fitted with chest leads for continuous electrocardiographic recording (model CR7, Cardiac Recorders Limited) and the appropriately sized cuff of the 2300 Finapres noninvasive BP monitor (Ohmeda). This is a fully automated instrument that allows continuous noninvasive assessment of finger arterial pressure. It uses the arterial clamp technique of Penaz30 and is well validated against intra-arterial BP measurements in all age groups.16 17 18 19 The cuff was fitted to the middle finger or thumb of the hemiparetic hand in stroke patients and the nondominant hand in control subjects and was maintained at heart level by resting on an adjustable support throughout.
After a period of at least 15 minutes of rest and after achievement of
a satisfactory BP signal from the monitor and stabilization of BP at
the same level (mean 2-minute BP levels not varying by >10 mm Hg
over
10 minutes), recordings were performed for three
sequential periods of 10 minutes each. The Finapres device has a
built-in system (Physio-Cal) that briefly interrupts the BP
recording automatically to keep the finger arteries fully
unloaded and the transmural pressure equal to zero (usually for 2 to 3
beats every 70 beats). This was switched off during the
recording period but applied at 10-minute intervals during the
monitoring period. Subjects were asked to maintain a respiratory rate
>15 breaths per minute, although respiratory rate and tidal volume
were not formally measured. No patients clinically exhibited
Cheyne-Stokes respiration. The analog outputs from the Finapres and
simultaneous surface electrocardiographic
recordings underwent analog-to-digital conversion at a rate of
200 samples per second and were downloaded to a dedicated personal
computer for subsequent analysis and noninvasive estimation of
BRS.
Data Analysis
Software specially written by Leicester University
Division of Medical Physics (R.P.), and which is in routine use in the
department at which these studies were undertaken,31 32
was used in the off-line analysis of the beat-to-beat BP and PI
recordings. The derived PI and SBP series were analyzed
by means of PSA with FFT with 512 samples. The data segments used were
extracted under visual inspection from the most stable (ie, stationary)
segment of each 10-minute recording. The beat-to-beat series of
PI and SBP were interpolated with a third-order polynomial and
resampled with an interval of 0.5 second to produce signals with a
uniform time axis. The power spectra were obtained as the average of
three recordings for each patient and were smoothed with a
13-point triangular window. This produced estimates of power spectra of
PI and SBP, coherence function, and frequency response between PI and
SBP with 58 df. Coherence between BP and PI variability
reflects the amount of linear coupling between the two spectra and is
therefore comparable to the correlation coefficient in regression
analysis. A coherence value >0.40 was considered
significant.33 Recordings with an ectopy rate
>2% were rejected. Spikes on the resampled tracings of the PI and SBP
recordings were manually removed, and a straight line was
interpolated by the computer, although resampled tracings with >4
spikes were excluded from subsequent analysis to avoid
bias.
PSA estimates of cardiac BRS were obtained by calculation of the
-index (square root of the ratio of the powers of PI to BP) for the
LF band (0.05 to 0.15 Hz), for the HF band (0.20 to 0.35 Hz), and for
the combined
-index (0.5x[LF cardiac BRS+HF cardiac BRS]). To
correct for variability in total and VLF powers (0.02 to 0.05 Hz), the
powers of the LF and HF spectra for PI and for SBP were calculated in
normalized units20 34 :
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Statistical Methods
Normality of the data was determined by construction of a normal
probability plot with the use of the Minitab statistical package
(Minitab 10 for Windows, Minitab Inc). If a value of P<.05
was obtained with the Ryan-Joiner test, then the data were not
considered normally distributed. For normally distributed data the
results are presented as mean (SD), and statistical comparisons
between stroke and control groups were made with the use of the
Student's unpaired t test. For nonnormally distributed
data, results are presented as median (range), and statistical
comparisons between stroke and control groups were made with the
Mann-Whitney test. Significance was taken at the 5% level.
Ethical Considerations
Subjects or their caregivers (when appropriate) gave their
informed consent, and the study was approved by the Leicestershire
Hospitals Ethical Committee.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-index, although the difference in the LF
band did not reach statistical significance (Table 2
-index and increasing SBP (r=-.40, P<.02),
although the negative relationship with age was not significant
(r=-.27, P=.11). Neither of these correlation
coefficients was significant in acute stroke patients (age,
r=-.25, P=.19; SBP, r=-.13,
P=.51). Cardiac BRS and PI were positively correlated in the
whole study group (r=.51, P<.001).
|
|
No difference in the mean coherence between the SBP and PI spectra (reflecting the relationship between changes in PI and SBP) was seen for control subjects and acute stroke patients (LF band, 0.47 versus 0.47; HF band, 0.52 versus 0.45). The phase difference between PI and SBP was approximately 0° at HF but at LF was negative, implying that the SBP was leading the PI change, and therefore was consistent with a baroreceptor-derived response.
The analyses of cardiac BRS were repeated to compare the 24
acute stroke patients with a CT diagnosis of cerebral infarction and
confirmed the results of the whole group. The HF BRS (4.75 [2.00 to
14.62] versus 6.50 [2.31 to 21.49] ms/mm Hg; P=.03) and
combined
-indices(4.75 [1.86 to 13.31] versus 5.46 [2.82 to
16.83] ms/mm Hg; P=.05) were significantly lower in stroke
patients than in control subjects, although differences in LF BRS did
not reach statistical significance (4.51 [1.43 to 12.00] versus 5.08
[1.56 to 20.67] ms/mm Hg; P=.4).
The normalized values of the LF and HF components of the PI and
SBP spectra were calculated. No significant differences were observed
in the LF component of either PI or SBP spectra between acute stroke
patients and control subjects (Table 3
).
However, the normalized power of the HF component of the SBP spectrum
was significantly greater in acute stroke patients, with a significant
reduction in the normalized ratio of LF to HF (Table 3
). There was no
significant difference in the ratio of LF to HF for PI between stroke
patients and control subjects. The power spectra for PI (Fig 1
) and SBP (Fig 2
) are shown. The LF and HF components of
the PI and SBP spectra were also compared in the 18 right and 17 left
hemisphere stroke patients; the 2 patients with signs of
cerebellar/brain stem stroke were excluded. Right hemisphere stroke
patients showed a significant reduction in the normalized HF component
of PI variability, with an associated increase in the ratio of LF to HF
(Table 4
).
|
|
|
|
SBP variability, as assessed by the SD of beat-to-beat BP
recordings, was significantly increased in acute stroke
patients compared with control subjects (14.7 [6.9] versus 10.9
[3.5] mm Hg; P=.008), although no significant
difference was observed in PI variability (59.8 [36.7] versus 46.5
[22.5]; P=.09). Cardiac BRS, assessed by the combined
-index, was negatively correlated with SBP variability
(r=-.11, P=.36) and positively correlated with
PI variability (r=.36, P=.003).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The traditional pharmacological vasopressor (with the use of angiotensin or phenylephrine) and vasodepressor (with the use of nitroglycerin or sodium nitroprusside) stimuli are usually considered the gold standard techniques of cardiac BRS estimation. The development of alternative analyses for the assessment of cardiac BRS, including PSA techniques, has obviated the need for drug-induced BP disturbances and their potential shortcomings, and these techniques were used in the present study. The present study has demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiac BRS in patients studied within 72 hours of acute stroke and to our knowledge is the first study assessing cardiac BRS changes in the acute stroke period.
Impaired cardiac BRS may not be a benign phenomenon; it is now well recognized as a useful prognostic indicator after acute myocardial infarction.35 36 37 38 Odemuyiwa and colleagues38 observed that early markedly depressed cardiac BRS (<3 ms/mm Hg) predicted markedly depressed cardiac BRS at 3 months. This may explain the observation that impaired cardiac BRS after acute myocardial infarction identifies a group of patients at high risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death not only acutely but for several months after myocardial infarction.39 40 Indeed, the importance of impaired cardiac BRS in the risk assessment of patients after acute myocardial infarction is currently being assessed in an ongoing multicenter trial, Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction.41
Total SBP power reflecting beat-to-beat variability in SBP was increased in acute stroke patients compared with control subjects, although the difference was not statistically significant. However, SBP variability assessed by the SD of beat-to-beat BP recordings was significantly increased after acute stroke, in keeping with our previous findings.12 The possible explanations of this can now be considered in more detail. The short-term increase in BP variability may be inversely related to cardiac BRS,13 14 15 ie, the greater the BP variability, the less sensitive the baroreceptor. The present study has clearly demonstrated impaired cardiac BRS sensitivity in acute stroke patients compared with control subjects matched with respect to age, sex, and BP. However, baroreceptor-derived responses to BP variability are mediated by changes in PI or vasomotor tone, and no significant difference in PI variability in stroke patients compared with control subjects was observed, as we have previously reported.12 Issues related to vasomotor tone may also be important, and factors involved in vasomotor tone are understood to influence the VLF component of the power spectrum of BP variability,42 although influences on VLF power are imprecise and speculative25 and cannot be commented on in this study because of the short recording periods.
In addition to impaired cardiac BRS, increased short-term BP variability after acute stroke may be related to changes in sympathetic tone, although this was not reflected by an increase in SBP LF power, which may be a surrogate marker of sympathetic vasomotor tone.25 The increase in SBP HF power probably simply reflects the mechanical effects of respiration on BP,43 44 45 46 although formal measurements of respiratory rate or tidal volume were not made in the present study; this is a limitation of this study, particularly given the changes that may occur in the frequency and amplitude of respiration after stroke.
The present study found no significant difference in the power
spectra for PI variability during supine rest between acute stroke
patients and control subjects (Fig 1
). Barron and
colleagues47 have recently reported the results of the PSA
of PI variability in 40 patients studied 4 to 11 days after ictus
compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects. In contrast to the
present study, they found a significant reduction in
respiratory-related activity (frequency range not stated) in stroke
patients. However, the results are expressed in absolute units despite
a significant reduction in total power in the stroke patients. More
importantly, the respiratory pattern of both groups is not clearly
stated, despite the differing effects of spontaneous respiration and
respiration controlled at different rates on the HF
peak.48 Barron and colleagues also reported further
differences in the PI variability power spectra between the 20 right
and 20 left hemisphere strokes and found that respiratory-related
activity was further reduced in right compared with left hemisphere
stroke patients.47 Naver and colleagues49
also assessed PI changes, expressed by the ratio of maximum to minimum
PI during a 1-minute cycle of 6 breaths per minute, and found evidence
of selective parasympathetic dysfunction in right hemisphere stroke.
The present study identified a significant reduction in normalized
HF power in the 18 right hemisphere compared with the 17 left
hemisphere patients. This resulted in a change in the sympathovagal
balance, as evidenced by a significant increase in the normalized ratio
of LF to HF in right hemisphere strokes and a resulting sympathetic
predominance. Such a change in sympathetic tone may be important in
explaining the increased risk of abnormalities of heart rate control
after stroke.50 51 Lane and colleagues52
observed a significant increase in supraventricular
arrhythmias after right hemisphere stroke and suggested that
this may be related to an alteration in parasympathetic/sympathetic
tone.
In summary, the present study, in which novel noninvasive techniques were used as an alternative to traditional pharmacological vasopressor and depressor methods, found that cardiac BRS was significantly reduced in acute stroke patients compared with age-, sex-, and BP-matched control subjects. The HF variability in SBP was significantly greater after acute stroke, probably reflecting differences in respiratory rate as well as volume on the mechanical effects of respiration on BP. No significant differences were found in PI variability between stroke patients and control subjects, suggesting that sympathovagal balance is not altered in the acute poststroke period. However, the increase in BP variability in the acute stroke period may have prognostic implications that require further study.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 7, 1997; revision received April 18, 1997; accepted May 16, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Jansen P, Schulte B, Poels E, Gribnau F. Course of blood pressure after cerebral infarction and transient ischaemic attack. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1987;89:243-246.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Harper G, Castleden C, Potter J. When can we diagnose hypertension after stroke? Age Ageing. 1991;20(suppl 1):P23. Abstract.
4.
Meyer J, Stoica E, Pascu I, Shimazu K, Hartmann
A. Catecholamine concentrations in CSF and plasma of
patients with cerebral infarction and haemorrhage.
Brain. 1973;96:277-288.
5. Feibel J, Baldwin C, Joynt R. Catecholamine-associated refractory hypertension following acute intracranial hemorrhage: control with propranolol. Ann Neurol. 1981;9:340-343.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Myers M, Norris J, Hachinski V, Sole M. Plasma
norepinephrine in stroke. Stroke. 1981;12:200-204.
7. Olsson T. Urinary free cortisol excretion shortly after ischaemic stroke. J Intern Med. 1990;228:177-181.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Doba N, Reis D. Role of the cerebellum
and the vestibular apparatus in regulation of
orthostatic reflexes in the cat. Circ
Res. 1974;34:9-18.
9. Cechetto D, Wilson J, Smith K, Wolski D, Silver M, Hachinski V. Autonomic and myocardial changes in middle cerebral artery occlusion: stroke models in the rat. Brain Res. 1989;502:296-305.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Appenzeller O, Descarries L. Circulatory reflexes in patients with cerebrovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:820-823.
11. Gross M. Circulatory reflexes in cerebral ischaemia involving different vascular territories. Clin Sci. 1970;38:491-502.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Robinson T, Ward-Close S, Potter J. A comparison of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in acute and subacute stroke patients with cerebral infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;7:214-219.
13. Mancia G, Ferrari A, Gregorini L, Parati G, Pomidossi G, Bertinieri G, Grassi G, Zanchetti A. Blood pressure variability in man: its relation to high blood pressure, age and baroreceptor sensitivity. Clin Sci. 1980;59:401S-404S.
14.
Mancia G, Parati G, Pomidossi G, Casadei R, Di Rienzo
M, Zanchetti A. Arterial baroreflex and blood
pressure and heart rate variabilities in humans.
Hypertension. 1986;8:147-153.
15.
Floras J, Hassan M, Vann Jones J, Osikowska B, Sever P,
Sleight P. Factors influencing blood pressure and heart rate
variability in hypertensive humans. Hypertension. 1988;11:273-281.
16. Imholz B, van Montfrans G, Settels J, van der Hoeven G, Karemaker J, Wieling W. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring: reliability of Finapres device during Valsalva manoeuvre. Cardiovasc Res. 1988;22:390-397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Parati G, Casadei R, Groppelli A, di Rienzo M, Mancia
HG. Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood
pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing.
Hypertension. 1989;13:647-655.
18.
Imholz B, Settels J, van der Meiracker A, Wesseling K,
Wieling W. Non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure
measurement during orthostatic stress compared to
intra-arterial pressure. Cardiovasc Res. 1990;24:214-221.
19. Rongen G, Bos W, Lenders J, van Montfrans G, van Lier H, van Goudever J, Wesseling K, Thien T. Comparison of intrabrachial and finger blood pressure in healthy elderly volunteers. Am J Hypertens.. 1995;8:237-248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S.
Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the
frequency domain. Circulation. 1991;84:482-491.
21. Kay S, Marple S. Spectrum analysis: a modern perspective. Proc IEEE. 1981;69:1380-1419.
22.
Pagani M, Somers V, Furlan R, Dell'Orto S, Conway J,
Baselli G, Cerutti S, Sleight P, Malliani A. Changes in
autonomic regulation induced by physical training in mild
hypertension. Hypertension. 1988;12:600-610.
23. James M, Panerai R, Potter J. Spectral and sequence analysis in the assessment of arterial baroreceptor sensitivity in the elderly. J Hypertens. 1996;12:1499. Abstract.
24.
Malliani A, Lombardi F, Pagani M. Power spectrum
analysis of heart rate variability: a tool to explore neural
regulatory mechanisms. Br Heart J. 1994;71:1-2.
25.
Parati G, Saul P, di Rienzo M, Mancia G.
Spectral analysis of blood pressure and heart rate variability
in evaluating cardiovascular regulation: a critical
appraisal. Hypertension. 1995;25:1276-1286.
26. Rosen A, Gur R, Sussman N, Gur R, Hurtig H. Hemispheric asymmetry in the control of heart rate. Neurosci Abs. 1982;8:917. Abstract.
27. Lane R, Novelty R, Cornell C, Zeitlin S, Schwartz G. Asymmetric hemispheric control of heart rate. Psychophysiology. 1988;25:464.
28.
Zamrini E, Meador K, Loring D, Nichols F, Lee G,
Figueroa R, Thompson W. Unilateral cerebral inactivation
produces differential left/right heart rate responses.
Neurology. 1990;40:1408-1411.
29. Lane R, Abrams R, Schwartz C, DuBois M, Van A. Differential effects of right and left unilateral electroconvulsive therapy on heart rate. Psychophysiology. 1991;28:S36.
30. Penaz J. Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger. In: Digest of the International Conference on Medicine and Biological Engineering, Conference Committee of the 10th International Conference on Medicine and Biological Engineering; Dresden, Germany; 1973:104.
31. James M, Panerai R, Potter J. Comparison of spontaneous sequence analysis and pharmacological methods in assessment of the arterial baroreflex in the elderly. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Meeting on Hypertension; June 9-12, 1995; 86.
32. Panerai R, James M, Potter J, Fan L, Evans D. Baroreceptor sensitivity in human subjects: sequence or spectral analysis? Comput Cardiol.. 1995;305-308.
33.
Panerai R, James M, Potter J. Impulse response
analysis of baroreceptor sensitivity. Am J
Physiol. 1997;272:H1866-H1875.
34.
Montano N, Ruscone T, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M,
Malliani A. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate
variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during
graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation. 1994;90:1826-1831.
35. Schwartz P, Zoza A, Pala M, Locati E, Beria G, Zanchetti A. Baroreflex sensitivity and its evaluation during the first year after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:629-636.[Abstract]
36.
Osculati G, Grassi G, Giannattasio C, Seravalle G,
Valagussa F, Zanchetti A, Mancia G. Early alterations of the
baroreceptor control of heart rate in patients with acute myocardial
infarction. Circulation. 1990;81:939-948.
37. Grassi G, Giannattasio C, Seravalle G, Osculati G, Valagussa F, Zanchetti A, Mancia G. Cardiopulmonary receptor and arterial baroreceptor after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:873-878.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Odemuyiwa O, Farrell T, Staunton A, Sneddon J, Poloniecki J, Bennett D, Malik M, Camm J. Influence of thrombolytic therapy on the evaluation of baroreceptor sensitivity after myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1993;125:285-291.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
La Rovere M, Specchia G, Montana A, Schwartz P.
Baroreflex sensitivity, clinical correlates, and
cardiovascular mortality among patients with a first
myocardial infarction: a prospective study.
Circulation. 1988;78:816-824.
40.
Farrell T, Odemuyiwa O, Bashir Y, Cripps T, Malik M,
Ward D, Camm A. Prognostic value of baroreceptor sensitivity
testing after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart
J. 1992;67:129-137.
41. Maggioni A, Zuanetti G. Arrhythmias and the autonomic nervous system. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1994;1:322-331.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Akselrod S, Gordon D, Madwed J, Snidman N, Shannon D, Cohen R. Hemodynamic regulation: investigation by spectral analysis. Am J Physiol. 1985;249:867-875.
43. DeBoer R, Karemaker J, Strackee J. Hemodynamic fluctuations and baroreflex sensitivity in humans: a beat-to-beat model. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:H1680-H1689.
44.
Peters J, Kindred M, Robotham J. Transient
analysis of cardiopulmonary interactions, I:
diastolic events. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64:1506-1517.
45.
Peters J, Kindred M, Robotham J. Transient
analysis of cardiopulmonary interactions, II:
systolic events. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64:1518-1526.
46.
Saul J, Berger R, Albrecht P, Stein S, Chen M, Cohen
R. Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique
insights into cardiovascular regulation.
Am J Physiol. 1991;261:H1231-H1245.
47. Barron S, Rogovski Z, Hemli J. Autonomic consequences of cerebral hemisphere infarction. Stroke. 1994;25:113-116.[Abstract]
48. Sanderson J, Yeung L, Yeung D, Kay R, Tomlinson B, Critchley J, Woo K, Bernardi L. Impact of changes in respiratory frequency and posture on power spectral analysis of heart rate and systolic blood pressure variability in normal subjects and patients with heart failure. Clin Sci. 1996;91:35-63.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Naver H, Blomstrand C, Wallin B. Reduced heart
rate variability after right-sided stroke. Stroke. 1996;27:247-251.
50.
Natelson B. Neurocardiology: an
interdisciplinary area for the 80s. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:178-184.
51. Talman W. Cardiovascular regulation and lesions of the central nervous system. Ann Neurol. 1985;18:1-12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52.
Lane R, Wallace J, Petrosky P, Schwartz G, Gradman
A. Supraventricular tachycardia in
patients with right hemisphere strokes. Stroke. 1992;23:362-366.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Stoneham and J. P. Thompson Arterial pressure management and carotid endarterectomy Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2009; 102(4): 442 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sykora, J. Diedler, A. Rupp, P. Turcani, and T. Steiner Impaired Baroreceptor Reflex Sensitivity in Acute Stroke Is Associated With Insular Involvement, But Not With Carotid Atherosclerosis Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 737 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Delgado-Mederos, M. Ribo, A. Rovira, M. Rubiera, J. Munuera, E. Santamarina, P. Delgado, O. Maisterra, J. Alvarez-Sabin, and C. A. Molina Prognostic significance of blood pressure variability after thrombolysis in acute stroke Neurology, August 19, 2008; 71(8): 552 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Qureshi Acute Hypertensive Response in Patients With Stroke: Pathophysiology and Management Circulation, July 8, 2008; 118(2): 176 - 187. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-J. Liu, X.-J. Ma, F.-M. Shen, J.-G. Liu, H. Chen, and D.-F. Su Arterial Baroreflex: A Novel Target for Preventing Stroke in Rat Hypertension Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1916 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chamorro, X. Urra, and A. M. Planas Infection After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Manifestation of Brain-Induced Immunodepression Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 1097 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Stead, R. M. Gilmore, K. C. Vedula, A. L. Weaver, W. W. Decker, and R. D. Brown Jr Impact of acute blood pressure variability on ischemic stroke outcome Neurology, June 27, 2006; 66(12): 1878 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nasr, A. Pavy-Le Traon, and V. Larrue Baroreflex Sensitivity Is Impaired in Bilateral Carotid Atherosclerosis Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 1891 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Avnon, M. Nitzan, E. Sprecher, Z. Rogowski, and D. Yarnitsky Autonomic asymmetry in migraine: augmented parasympathetic activation in left unilateral migraineurs Brain, September 1, 2004; 127(9): 2099 - 2108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Carey, R. B. Panerai, and J. F. Potter Effect of Aging on Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation During Head-Up Tilt Stroke, August 1, 2003; 34(8): 1871 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Robinson, S. L. Dawson, P. J. Eames, R. B. Panerai, J. F. Potter, and S. Oppenheimer Cardiac Baroreceptor Sensitivity Predicts Long-Term Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke * Editorial Comment Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 705 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Eames, M J Blake, S L Dawson, R B Panerai, and J F Potter Dynamic cerebral autoregulation and beat to beat blood pressure control are impaired in acute ischaemic stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2002; 72(4): 467 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Saleh, A. E. Cribb, and B. J. Connell Reduction in infarct size by local estrogen does not prevent autonomic dysfunction after stroke Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): R2088 - R2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Saleh, A. E. Cribb, and B. J. Connell Estrogen-induced recovery of autonomic function after middle cerebral artery occlusion in male rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): R1531 - R1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Carey, P. J. Eames, M. J. Blake, R. B. Panerai, and J. F. Potter Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Is Unaffected by Aging Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 2895 - 2900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Phillips, D. L. Jardine, P. J. Parkin, T. Hughes, H. Ikram, and H. Ikram Brain Stem Stroke Causing Baroreflex Failure and Paroxysmal Hypertension Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 1997 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Dawson, B. N. Manktelow, T. G. Robinson, R. B. Panerai, and J. F. Potter Which Parameters of Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure and Variability Best Predict Early Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke? Stroke, February 1, 2000; 31(2): 463 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Robinson, J. Potter, R. Panerai, J. T. Korpelainen, K. A. Sotaniemi, and V. V. Myllyla Heart Rate Variability Following Ischemic Stroke • Response Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30 (10): 2238a - 2248. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.F. Potter What should we do about blood pressure and stroke? QJM, February 1, 1999; 92(2): 63 - 66. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Robinson and J. Potter Cardiopulmonary and Arterial Baroreflex-Mediated Control of Forearm Vasomotor Tone Is Impaired After Acute Stroke Stroke, December 1, 1997; 28(12): 2357 - 2362. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |