From the Division of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix,
Arizona.
Correspondence to James L. Frey, MD, 222 West Thomas Rd, Ste 415, Phoenix, AZ 85013.
MethodsWe examined 1290 white (WHI), 242 Hispanic (HIS), 83
Native American (NA), and 101 other stroke and transient
ischemic attack (TIA) patients hospitalized at the Barrow
Neurological Institute from 1990 through 1996.
ResultsChi-square analysis detected significant
(P<.05) differences as follows: (1) Stroke types lacunes
more prevalent in NA than WHI and HIS (30% versus 16% and 15%);
cardioembolic more prevalent in WHI than HIS (16% versus 9%, NA
14%); hemorrhages more prevalent in HIS than WHI and NA (48%
versus 37% and 27%); (2) Risk factors hypertension more prevalent
in HIS than WHI (72% versus 66%; NA 71%); diabetes more prevalent in
NA than HIS and WHI (62% versus 36% and 17%); cigarette smoking more
prevalent in WHI than HIS and NA (61% versus 46% and 41%); cardiac
disease more prevalent in WHI than HIS (34% versus 24%; NA 27%);
heavier alcohol intake in NA than HIS than WHI (43% versus 24% versus
17%). There were no significant outcome differences between races for
any stroke type. ANOVA detected significantly lower mean age at stroke
onset in NA than HIS than WHI (56 versus 61 versus 69 years).
ConclusionsThere are significant differences in prevalence of
risk factors and stroke types between WHI, HIS, and NA in our
hospital-based population. Although the three races appear to respond
to risk factors similarly, Hispanics may be especially susceptible to
hemorrhage. Further evaluation of these observations in
community-based studies will be important.
We have utilized unique access to stroke data on hospitalized Hispanics
and Native Americans to analyze features of stroke in these
groups and to compare them with our white patients, as well as with
Hispanic and Native American populations elsewhere. We describe our
hospital-based data recorded from these populations and discuss the
implications for stroke prevention.
Race/ethnicity was determined by the patient or family's response to
the question, "What is your racewhite, black, Hispanic white
(referred to as `Hispanic'), Native American, Asian, or other?"
Because of the small number of black and Asian subjects, evaluation was
limited to data on white, Hispanic, and Native American groups. Risk
factor identification was in accordance with the following definitions:
hypertensionhistory of hypertension (treated or untreated) or left
ventricular hypertrophy on ECG or echocardiogram;
diabeteshistory of diabetes (treated or untreated); cigarette
smokinghistory of more than 20-pack years, currently smoking or not;
cardiac diseasehistory of either congestive heart failure, angina,
myocardial infarction, pacemaker, or atrial fibrillation; alcohol
intakehistory of heavy alcohol intake defined as >12 oz of wine,
24 oz of beer, or 3 oz of liquor per day;
hypercholesterolemiaabnormal
cholesterol elevation by history (treated or untreated) or
documented during hospitalization.
After review of the entire medical record, stroke type was
assigned to each subject based on uniform diagnostic
criteria. Lacunar, atherothrombotic, intraparenchymal
hemorrhage, hemorrhagic infarct, cardioembolic, TIA,
"unknown," and "other" strokes were identified. TIA was defined
as stroke symptoms resolving within 24 hours.
Criteria for lacunar infarction included an appropriate clinical
syndrome with or without lesion on CT and/or MRI scan, or an atypical
clinical syndrome with a sub-cortical lesion <1.5 cm diameter on CT
and/or MRI. Less than 50% ipsilateral carotid stenosis by
ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, or conventional
angiography, and negative testing for potential cardioembolic source
were required. A history of diabetes mellitus or hypertension was
supportive.
Criteria for atherothrombotic infarction included an appropriate
clinical syndrome with or without lesion on CT and/or MRI or an
atypical syndrome with an appropriate scan lesion. Greater than 50%
stenosis of an appropriate large artery and negative cardiac
evaluation were required. A history of previous TIAs in the same
vascular territory was supportive.
Criteria for intraparenchymal hemorrhage included appropriate
clinical syndrome with CT and/or MRI findings compatible with
intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Hemorrhages related to
trauma, aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation rupture were
excluded.
Criteria for cardioembolic stroke included an appropriate clinical
syndrome with or without lesion on CT and/or MRI or an atypical
clinical syndrome with an appropriate scan lesion. Cardiac evaluation
disclosing a potential intracardiac or transthoracic
(paradoxical) embolic source and absence of relevant cerebrovascular
stenosis were required. Evidence of stroke in more than one
vascular territory was supportive.
A stroke was classified as "unknown" when criteria for the above
categories could not be fulfilled or when two or more causes could not
be differentiated.
"Other" strokes were those caused by conditions such as migraine,
vessel dissection, vasculitis, or coagulopathies. Hemorrhagic
infarctions were included in this category because numbers were small
(1.2% for white, 2.5% Hispanic, and 1.2% Native American).
"Time-to-examination" was defined as the time between symptom onset
to time of examination at our facility.
"Outcome" was defined as either favorable (discharged to home or to
a rehabilitation facility) or unfavorable (discharged to long-term care
facility or death).
Statistical Analysis
Sociodemographics and Risk Factors
Stroke Types
Outcome
Our data indicate a lower age at stroke onset in Hispanics and Native
Americans. Data from the northern Manhattan and San Diego stroke
studies also document a tendency for younger age at stroke onset in
Hispanics than in whites (67 versus 80 years in the northern Manhattan
study, 60 versus 63 years in the San Diego study).2 3 4
Although it is tempting to construe the younger age at stroke onset in
our Hispanics and Native Americans as an indication of poorer vascular
health, census data disclose that Hispanic and Native American
populations are younger than whites.16 United States census
data disclose a median age in Hispanics of 26 years, in Native
Americans of 27 years, and in whites of 35 years.17 Thus,
our finding of a lower age at stroke onset in Hispanics and Native
Americans is more likely a reflection of the generally younger ages of
Hispanic and Native American populations than of poorer vascular
health.
Our Hispanics with stroke have the highest proportion of hypertension,
the second highest proportion of diabetes, and the second highest
proportion of heavy alcohol intake. The prevalence of hypertension and
diabetes in our Hispanic stroke patients is higher than in the age
matched southwestern Hispanic population (72% versus 46% for
hypertension, 36% versus 31% for diabetes), implying a relation
between these risk factors and stroke.18 19 20 21
As in the northern Manhattan study,1 Hispanics in our study
have the highest proportion of hemorrhages. This proportion is
four times higher than in the northern Manhattan study1 and
is likely contributed to by referral bias (hemorrhages are the
most frequent stroke type for all three races in our center). However,
the higher proportion of hemorrhages among Hispanics with
stroke may also reflect the effects of combined risk factors. These
include less vigorous blood pressure control, something that has been
documented in Hispanic population studies22 23 ; sensitivity
to the effect of hypertension because of relative arterial
wall thinness24 ; and alcohol intake, which has been
implicated as a contributor to hemorrhage,25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
and which has been identified as a potential risk factor in southwest
Hispanic population studies.33 34 35
Our Native American patients have the highest proportion of diabetes
mellitus and the second highest proportion of hypertension. The
prevalence of diabetes mellitus in our Native Americans with stroke is
similar to that of the age matched Arizona Native American population
(62% and 64%).36 37 The prevalence of hypertension in our
Native Americans with stroke is higher than that of the age matched
Arizona Native American population (71% versus 44%).38 It
is not surprising that this risk factor combination is associated with
a higher percentage of lacunar strokes in our Native Americans, given
the documented relationship between these two risk factors and lacunar
infarction in whites.39 40
Although there are definitional differences between studies, the
proportion of heavy alcohol users in our Native American patients with
stroke is higher than that of southwestern Native American populations
in general (43% versus 22%).41 42 43 Heavy alcohol use is a
documented risk factor for stroke28 30 and therefore may be
a contributor in our Native American patients. The higher proportion of
heavy alcohol intake in our Native Americans might have been expected
to correlate with a higher percentage of
hemorrhages.27 28 29 30 However, this was not the case,
perhaps because of increased arterial wall thickness
secondary to diabetes.
Although the proportion of smoking in our Native American stroke
patients is lower than for whites and Hispanics, it is higher than that
of the non-age matched southwestern Native American population (41%
versus 16%).43 This raises concern about the role of
smoking as a stroke risk factor for Native Americans, which could be
better addressed with more specific age-focused population studies.
Although cholesterol differences between the races were not
significant, the trend for hypercholesterolemia
in our white patients is compatible with a higher proportion of
atherothrombotic infarctions in this population. Similarly, the trend
for lower cholesterol in our Hispanic patients is
compatible with a higher proportion of hemorrhages. These
findings are consistent with other studies, which have
validated these relationships between cholesterol and
stroke type.44 45
The observed favorable outcomes for lacunar and atherothrombotic
infarctions and less favorable outcomes for cardioembolic strokes and
hemorrhages are consistent with what is generally known
about the prognosis for these stroke types.46 47 48 The lack
of significant racial outcome differences for each stroke type is not
necessarily surprising. We are unaware of any biological reasons why
such outcome differences should exist, and there are no published data
regarding outcome differences for stroke types between races.
Special Discussion
Our data and those from the northern Manhattan study support the notion
of similar vascular risk profiles between these two Hispanic subgroups.
Both sets of data document a higher proportion of hemorrhages
in Hispanics than whites, a lower proportion of cardioembolic strokes,
and a slightly lower proportion of atherothrombotic
strokes.1 2 These data also suggest that susceptibility to
risk factors is similar between Hispanics and whites. Hispanics are
known to have less cardiac disease and smoking, correlating with fewer
cardioembolic and atherothrombotic strokes.18 52 The
notable exception is the propensity of Hispanics to develop brain
hemorrhage despite a lower general population prevalence of
hypertension.1 9 This phenomenon may ultimately be
explained by analysis of other risk factors in Hispanics with
hemorrhage.
Native Americans are thought to have migrated to this continent from
eastern Asia via the arctic regions of western Canada between the
thirteenth and sixteenth centuries. Although Native American
populations are geographically dispersed and culturally diverse, they
have maintained a strong tendency for hypertension and diabetes
mellitus and a less prominent tendency for
hypercholesteremia.38 54
Native American populations appear to be susceptible to the effects of
risk factors in the same way as white populations. Arizona Native
Americans, for example, have a higher prevalence of hypertension and
diabetes than Dakota Native Americans, but Dakota Native Americans have
a higher rate of CHD.38 54 The explanation for more CHD in
Dakota Native Americans is a higher prevalence of
hypercholesterolemia and smoking.
Hypercholesterolemia and smoking are the same
risk factors for CHD as in the white population.
Our Arizona Native American patients' tendency for lacunar stroke in
association with hypertension and diabetes is similar to what is known
for white populations.39 The tendency for lacunar stroke
would likely be applicable to all Native American populations to the
extent that they share the tendency for hypertension and diabetes. Our
data on risk factors and stroke types for Native Americans and similar
data for CHD in Native Americans imply that specific risk factors
predispose Native Americans to the same types of vascular events as
they do for whites.
In summary, our white, Hispanic, and Native American stroke patients
have different risk factor profiles and different proportions of stroke
types. Nonetheless, the three races appear to respond to risk factors
similarly. Because our hospital-based data are subject to referral
bias, it will be important to corroborate these observations and
conclusions with data from community studies. For now, it appears that
efforts to prevent stroke in Hispanics and Native Americans should
emphasize control of risk factors in the same way as is suggested for
whites.
Received December 31, 1996;
revision received October 2, 1997;
accepted October 2, 1997.
2.
Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC.
Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic
cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.
Stroke.. 1995;26:1420.
3.
Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnic
differences in stroke risk factors among hospitalized patients with
cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.
Neurology. 1995;45:659663.
4.
Zweifler RM, Lyden PD, Taft B, Kelly N, Rothrock JF.
Impact of race and ethnicity on ischemic stroke: the University
of California at San Diego Stroke Data Bank. Stroke. 1995;26:245248.
5.
Yatsu FM. Strokes in Asians, and Pacific-Islanders,
Hispanics, and Native Americans. Circulation. 1991;83:14711472.[Abstract]
6.
Frey JL, Jahnke HK, Bulfinch EW. Differences in stroke
between white, Hispanic, and Native American populations of Arizona.
Stroke. 1995;26:157. Abstract.
7.
Gillum RF. Epidemiology of
stroke in Hispanic Americans. Stroke. 1995;26:17071712.
8.
Bruno A, Qualls C. Clinical features of
ischemic stroke in Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in New
Mexico: a study of 341 consecutive patients at two hospitals.
Ethn Dis.. 1994;4:7781.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Bruno A, Carter S, Qualls C, Nolte KB. Incidence of
spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage among
Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in New Mexico. Neurology.. 1996;47:405408.
10.
Aronow WS, Schoenfeld MR. Prevalence of
atherothrombotic brain infarction and extracranial carotid
arterial disease and their association in elderly blacks,
Hispanics, and whites. Am J Cardiology. 1993;71:9991000.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Kattapong VJ, Becker TM. Ethnic differences in
mortality from cerebrovascular disease among New Mexico's Hispanics,
Native Americans, and non-Hispanic whites, 1958 through 1987.
Ethn Dis. 1993;3:7582.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Howard G, Anderson R, Sorlie P, Andrews V, Backlund E,
Burke GL. Ethnic differences in stroke mortality between non-Hispanic
whites, Hispanic whites, and blacks: the National Longitudinal
Mortality Study. Stroke. 1994;25:21202125.[Abstract]
13.
Gillum RF. The epidemiology of
stroke in Native Americans. Stroke. 1995;26:514521.
14.
United States Bureau of the Census. 1990
Census:National and State Population Counts for Hispanic American.
Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1991.
15.
DeGraba TJ, Fisher M, Yatsu FM. Atherogenesis of
strokes. In: Barnett HJM, Mohr JP, Stein BM, Yatsu FM, eds.
Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. 2nd ed.
New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992: 2948.
16.
Arizona Department of Health Services. 1990
Arizona Census Population by Race/Ethnicity and by Age Group.
Office of Chronic Disease Prevention, Bureau of Prevention and Health
Promotion; May 1997.
17.
United States Bureau of the Census. Resident
Population, by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Single Years of Age:
1995; Population Paper Listing 41:Washington, DC: U. S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; 1995.
18.
Pappas G, Gergen PJ, Carroll M. Hypertension prevalence
and the status of awareness, treatment, and control in the Hispanic
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES). Am J
Public Health. 1990;80:143136.
19.
Stern MP, Gaskill SP, Allen CR Jr, Garza V, Gonzales
JL, Waldrop RH. Cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican
Americans in Laredo, Texas: I. prevalence of overweight and diabetes
and distribution of serum lipids. II. prevalence and control of
hypertension. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113:546562.
20.
Harris MI. Epidemiological correlates of NIDDM in
Hispanics, whites, and blacks in the U.S. population. Diabetes
Care. 1991;14:(suppl 3):639648.
21.
Sorel JE, Ragland DR, Syme SL. Blood pressure in
Mexican Americans, whites, and blacks: the second National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey and the Hispanic Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:370378.
22.
Haffner SM, Morales PA, Hazuda HP, Stern MP. Level of
control of hypertension in Mexican American and non Hispanic whites.
Hypertension. 1993;21:8388.
23.
Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, Cutler JA, Higgens M,
Horan MJ, Labarthe D. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult
population: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey, 19881991. Hypertension. 1995;25:305313.
24.
D'Augustino RB, Burke G, O'Leary D, Rewers M, Selby
J, Savage PJ, Saad MF, Bergman RN, Howard G, Wagenknecht L, Haffner SM.
Ethnic differences in carotid wall thickness: the Insulin Resistance
Atherosclerosis Study. Stroke.. 1996;27:17441749.
25.
Juvela S, Hillbom M, Palomaki H. Risk factors for
spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Stroke.. 1995;26:15581564.
26.
Calandre L, Arnal C, Fernandez Ortega J, Bermejo F,
Felgeroso B, del Ser T, Vallejo A. Risk factors for spontaneous
cerebral hematomas: case-controlled study. Stroke. 1986;17:11261128.
27.
Klatsky AL, Armstrong MA, Friedman GD. Alcohol use and
subsequent cerebrovascular disease hospitalizations. Stroke. 1989;20:741746.
28.
Gorelick PB. The status of alcohol as a risk factor for
stroke. Stroke. 1989;20:16071610.
29.
Monforte R, Estruch R, Graus F, Nicolas JM,
Urbano-Marquez A. High ethanol consumption as risk factor for
intracerebral hemorrhage in young and
middle-aged people. Stroke.. 1990;21:15291532.
30.
Gill JS, Shipley MJ, Tsementzis SA, Hornby RS, Gill SK,
Hitchcock ER, Beevers DG. Alcohol consumption: a risk for hemorrhagic
and non-hemorrhagic stroke. Am J Med. 1991;90:489497.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Ojemann RG, Heros RC. Spontaneous brain
hemorrhage. Stroke. 1983;14:468475.
32.
Caplan LR. Intracerebral
haemorrhage. Lancet. 1992;339:656658.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Jessor R, Graves TD, Hanson RC, Jessor SL. Society,
personality, and deviant behavior: a study of a tri-ethnic community.
New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1968:184.
34.
Neff JA, Hoppe SK, Perea P. Acculturation and alcohol
use: drinking patterns and problems among Anglo and Mexican American
male drinkers. Hispanic J Beh Sci. 1987;l9:151181.
35.
State of New Mexico Department of Health, Division of
Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Planning. The New
Mexico Telephone Household Survey: Assessing Alcohol and Other Drug
Dependence Among Adults; Final project report. February 10, 1995.
36.
Lee ET, Howard BV, Savage PJ, Cowan LD, Fabsitz RR,
Oopik AJ, Yeh J, Go O, Robbins DC, Welty TK. Diabetes and impaired
glucose tolerance in three American Indian populations aged 4574
years: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:599610.[Abstract]
37.
Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Hamman RF, Miller M. Diabetes
incidence and prevalence in Pima Indians: a 19-fold greater incidence
than in Rochester, Minnesota. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108:497505.
38.
Welty TK, Lee ET, Yeh J, Cowan LD, Go O, Fabsitz RR, Le
N, Oopik AJ, Robbins DC, Howard BV. Cardiovascular
disease risk factors among American Indians: the Strong Heart Study.
Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:269287.
39.
Chamorro A, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, Foulkes MA, Kase
CS, Tatemichi TK, Wolf PA, Price TR, Hier DB. Clinical-computed
tomographic correlations of lacunar infarction in the stroke data bank.
Stroke.. 1991;22:175181.
40.
Tuszynski MH, Petito CK, Levy DE. Risk factors and
clinical manifestations of pathologically verified lacunar infarctions.
Stroke. 1989;20:990999.
41.
May PA. Substance abuse and American Indians:
prevalence and susceptibility. Intl J Addictions. 1982;17:11851209.
42.
May PA, Smith MB. Some Navajo Indian opinions about
alcohol abuse and prohibition: a survey and recommendations for policy.
J Studies Alcohol. 1988;49:324334.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Sugarman JR, Warren CW, Oge L, Helgerson SD. Using, the
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to monitor year 2000
objectives among American Indians. Pub Health Reports. 1992;107:449456.
44.
Tell GS, Crouse JR, Furberg CD. Relation between blood
lipids, lipoproteins, and cerebrovascular
atherosclerosis: a review. Stroke. 1988;19:423435.
45.
Iso H, Jacobs DR, Wentworth D, Neaton JD, Cohen
JD. Serum cholesterol levels and six-year mortality from
stroke in 350,977 men screened for the multiple risk factor
intervention trial. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:904910.[Abstract]
46.
Streifler JY, Furlan AJ, Barnett HJM. Cardiogenic brain
embolism: incidence, varieties, treatment. In: Barnett HJM, Mohr JP,
Stein BM, Yatsu FM, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and
Management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone;
1992:967994.
47.
Mohr JP. Lacunes. In. Barnett HJM, Mohr JP, Stein BM,
Yatsu FM, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and
Management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone;
1992:539560.
48.
Anderson CS, Jamrozik KD, Broadhurst RJ, Stewart-Wynne
EG. Predicting survival for 1 year among different subtypes of stroke:
results from the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 1994;25:19351944.[Abstract]
49.
McLemore SD, Romo R. The origins and development of the
Mexican American people. In: De La Garza RO, Bean FD, Bonjean CM, Romo
R, Alvarez R, eds. The Mexican American Experience: An
Interdisciplinary Anthology. Austin, Tex: University of Texas
Press; 1985.
50.
Moore J, Pachon H. Hispanics In the United
States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1985.
51.
Hanis CL, Ferrell RE, Barton SA, Aguilar L,
Garza-Ibarra A, Tulloch Br, Garcia CA, Schull WJ. Diabetes among
Mexican Americans in Starr County, Texas. Am J
Epidemiol. 1983;118:65972.
52.
Mitchell BD, Hazada HP, Haffner SM, Patterson JK, Stern
MP. Myocardial infarction in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites:
the San Antonio Heart Study. Circulation.. 1991;83:4551.
53.
Winkelby MA, Fortmann SP, Rockhill B. Health-related
risk factors in a sample of Hispanics and whites matched on
sociodemographic characteristics: the Stanford Five-City Project.
Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:13651375.
54.
Howard BV, Lee ET, Cowan LD, Fabsitz RR, Howard WJ,
Oopik AJ, Robbins DC, Savage PJ, Yeh JL, Welty TK. Coronary
heart disease prevalence and its relation to risk factors in American
Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:254268.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions
Differences in Stroke Between White, Hispanic, and Native American Patients
The Barrow Neurological Institute Stroke Database
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Background and
PurposeIdentification of specific features of stroke in minority
populations should lead to more effectively focused treatment and
prevention.
Key Words: epidemiology Hispanic Americans Indians, North American racial differences stroke
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Documentation of
specific features of stroke in minority populations should lead to more
effectively focused diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. The scope of
epidemiological data regarding stroke in Hispanics is
limited,1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 and only two studies have compared
information for whites, Hispanics, and Native Americans from the same
region.6 11
![]()
Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Data were collected on 1716 subjects (1290 white, 242 Hispanic,
83 Native American, 101 other) admitted to the Barrow Neurological
Institute of St Joseph's Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, with stroke
or TIA from 1990 through 1996. Patients were identified through
emergency department admission logs, and data were collected from
concurrent and retrospective chart review and interviews with patient
or family.
Differences were determined by
2 and ANOVA
methodology where appropriate. Significance was defined as
P<.05.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Seventy-five percent of our patients were white, 14% Hispanic,
5% Native American, and 6% other. This distribution is
representative of the proportion of each of these
ethnic groups within the Arizona population.14
Mean age at stroke onset was significantly lower in Native
Americans than Hispanics and whites, and age in Hispanics was
significantly lower than in whites (Table 1
). Hypertension was significantly more
prevalent in Hispanics than whites. Diabetes was significantly more
prevalent in Native Americans than Hispanics and whites and more
prevalent in Hispanics than whites. Cigarette smoking was significantly
more common in whites than Hispanics and Native Americans. Cardiac
disease was significantly more prevalent in whites than Hispanics.
History of hypercholesterolemia was not
significantly different between the races. Heavy alcohol intake was
significantly more prevalent in Native Americans than Hispanics and
whites and significantly more prevalent in Hispanics than whites.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Distribution of Stroke Risk Factors by Race
Hemorrhages were predominant in all races but were
significantly more prevalent in Hispanics than either whites or Native
Americans. Lacunes were significantly more prevalent in Native
Americans than whites. Cardioembolic strokes were significantly more
prevalent in whites than Hispanics. Atherothrombotic strokes occurred
without significant differences between the races (Table 2
). Fourteen percent of all patients had
TIAs and were excluded from this analysis.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Distribution of Stroke Type by Race
Chi-square analysis detected no significant interracial
outcome differences for the four known stroke types. However,
analysis of each stroke type for all races together disclosed
the greatest likelihood of a favorable outcome for lacunar stroke, a
lesser likelihood of favorable outcome for atherothrombotic and
cardioembolic strokes, and the least likelihood of favorable outcome
for hemorrhages (Table 3
).
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 3. Relative Likelihood of Favorable and Unfavorable
Outcome by Stroke Type
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Our white patients exhibit the highest proportion of cardioembolic
stroke. This is consistent with the higher prevalence of
cardiac disease in whites. These findings are also consistent
with data from both the northern Manhattan and the San Diego stroke
studies with respect to comparison of whites with
Hispanics.1 2 3 4 Also, the higher proportion of smokers in
our white patients with stroke is consistent with the trend for
more atherothrombotic strokes in whites, as well as with data regarding
stroke risk from cerebral
atherosclerosis.15
There are two large Hispanic populations in the United States.
Those in the southwest (Mexican Americans) are thought to
represent a genetic mixture of Spanish and Native
American.49 Those in the east (Puerto Ricans and Cubans)
represent a genetic mixture which is predominantly
Spanish, with contributions from Africa and other European
countries.50 Nonetheless, the Southwestern and Eastern
Hispanic populations have similar heritable vascular risk factors:
higher prevalence of diabetes and a lower prevalence of hypertension
than whites.18 19 20 51 Hispanics also have a lower
prevalence of cigarette smoking.52 53
![]()
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
CHD
=
coronary heart disease
LVH
=
left ventricular hypertrophy
MRI
=
magnetic resonance imaging
TIA
=
transient ischemic attack
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Sacco RL, Hauser WA, Mohr JP. Hospitalized stroke
in blacks and Hispanics in northern Manhattan. Stroke. 1991;22:14911496.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Ellis Does Race/Ethnicity Really Matter in Adult Neurogenics? Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2009; 18(4): 310 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tsivgoulis, J. L. Frey, M. Flaster, V. K. Sharma, A. Y. Lao, S. L. Hoover, W. Liu, E. Stamboulis, A. W. Alexandrov, M. D. Malkoff, et al. Pre-Tissue Plasminogen Activator Blood Pressure Levels and Risk of Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3631 - 3634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, J. M. Galloway, T. K. Welty, D. O. Wiebers, J. P. Whisnant, R. B. Devereux, J. R. Kizer, B. V. Howard, L. D. Cowan, J. Yeh, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors for Stroke in American Indians: The Strong Heart Study Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): 1577 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y.-J. Shen, J. F. Yao, S. S. Brar, M. B. Jorgensen, X. Wang, and W. Chen Racial/Ethnic Differences in Ischemic Stroke Rates and the Efficacy of Warfarin Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): 2736 - 2743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): e873 - e923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1583 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Bravata, C. K. Wells, B. Gulanski, W. N. Kernan, L. M. Brass, J. Long, and J. Concato Racial Disparities in Stroke Risk Factors: The Impact of Socioeconomic Status Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1507 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Stansbury, H. Jia, L. S. Williams, W. B. Vogel, and P. W. Duncan Ethnic Disparities in Stroke: Epidemiology, Acute Care, and Postacute Outcomes Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 374 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Frey, H. K. Jahnke, P. W. Goslar, S. Partovi, and M. S. Flaster tPA by telephone: Extending the benefits of a comprehensive stroke center Neurology, January 11, 2005; 64(1): 154 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Arauz, L. Murillo, C. Cantu, F. Barinagarrementeria, and J. Higuera Prospective Study of Single and Multiple Lacunar Infarcts Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Risk Factors, Recurrence, and Outcome in 175 Consecutive Cases Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2453 - 2458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Suh, S.-H. Lee, K. R. Kim, S. T. Park, S. M. Lim, S. J. Kim, C. G. Choi, and H. K. Lee Pattern of Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis in Korean Patients with Stroke: Different Involvement of Intracranial versus Extracranial Vessels AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2003; 24(2): 239 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Morgenstern, L. Steffen-Batey, M. A. Smith, and L. A. Moye Barriers to Acute Stroke Therapy and Stroke Prevention in Mexican Americans Stroke, June 1, 2001; 32(6): 1360 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, K. Becker, C. D. Furberg, P. B. Gorelick, G. Hademenos, M. Hill, G. Howard, V. J. Howard, B. Jacobs, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103(1): 163 - 182. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, K. Becker, C. D. Furberg, P. B. Gorelick, G. Hademenos, M. Hill, G. Howard, V. J. Howard, B. Jacobs, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 280 - 299. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Saposnik, L. R. Caplan, L. A. Gonzalez, A. Baird, J. Dashe, A. Luraschi, R. Llinas, S. Lepera, I. Linfante, C. Chaves, et al. Differences in Stroke Subtypes Among Natives and Caucasians in Boston and Buenos Aires Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2385 - 2389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Fustinoni and J. Biller Ethnicity and Stroke : Beware of the Fallacies Stroke, May 1, 2000; 31(5): 1013 - 1015. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Han and W. E. Haley Family Caregiving for Patients With Stroke : Review and Analysis Stroke, July 1, 1999; 30(7): 1478 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bruno Are There Differences in Vascular Disease Between Ethnic and Racial Groups? Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |