Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bulfinch, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bulfinch, E. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Hispanic-American Health
*Native-American Health

(Stroke. 1998;29:29-33.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Differences in Stroke Between White, Hispanic, and Native American Patients

The Barrow Neurological Institute Stroke Database

James L. Frey, MD; Heidi K. Jahnke, RN, BSN; Eric W. Bulfinch, EdD

From the Division of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

Correspondence to James L. Frey, MD, 222 West Thomas Rd, Ste 415, Phoenix, AZ 85013.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose—Identification of specific features of stroke in minority populations should lead to more effectively focused treatment and prevention.

Methods—We examined 1290 white (WHI), 242 Hispanic (HIS), 83 Native American (NA), and 101 other stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients hospitalized at the Barrow Neurological Institute from 1990 through 1996.

Results—Chi-square analysis detected significant (P<.05) differences as follows: (1) Stroke types— lacunes more prevalent in NA than WHI and HIS (30% versus 16% and 15%); cardioembolic more prevalent in WHI than HIS (16% versus 9%, NA 14%); hemorrhages more prevalent in HIS than WHI and NA (48% versus 37% and 27%); (2) Risk factors— hypertension more prevalent in HIS than WHI (72% versus 66%; NA 71%); diabetes more prevalent in NA than HIS and WHI (62% versus 36% and 17%); cigarette smoking more prevalent in WHI than HIS and NA (61% versus 46% and 41%); cardiac disease more prevalent in WHI than HIS (34% versus 24%; NA 27%); heavier alcohol intake in NA than HIS than WHI (43% versus 24% versus 17%). There were no significant outcome differences between races for any stroke type. ANOVA detected significantly lower mean age at stroke onset in NA than HIS than WHI (56 versus 61 versus 69 years).

Conclusions—There are significant differences in prevalence of risk factors and stroke types between WHI, HIS, and NA in our hospital-based population. Although the three races appear to respond to risk factors similarly, Hispanics may be especially susceptible to hemorrhage. Further evaluation of these observations in community-based studies will be important.


Key Words: epidemiology • Hispanic Americans • Indians, North American • racial differences • stroke


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Documentation of specific features of stroke in minority populations should lead to more effectively focused diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. The scope of epidemiological data regarding stroke in Hispanics is limited,1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 and only two studies have compared information for whites, Hispanics, and Native Americans from the same region.6 11

We have utilized unique access to stroke data on hospitalized Hispanics and Native Americans to analyze features of stroke in these groups and to compare them with our white patients, as well as with Hispanic and Native American populations elsewhere. We describe our hospital-based data recorded from these populations and discuss the implications for stroke prevention.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Data were collected on 1716 subjects (1290 white, 242 Hispanic, 83 Native American, 101 other) admitted to the Barrow Neurological Institute of St Joseph's Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, with stroke or TIA from 1990 through 1996. Patients were identified through emergency department admission logs, and data were collected from concurrent and retrospective chart review and interviews with patient or family.

Race/ethnicity was determined by the patient or family's response to the question, "What is your race—white, black, Hispanic white (referred to as `Hispanic'), Native American, Asian, or other?" Because of the small number of black and Asian subjects, evaluation was limited to data on white, Hispanic, and Native American groups. Risk factor identification was in accordance with the following definitions: hypertension—history of hypertension (treated or untreated) or left ventricular hypertrophy on ECG or echocardiogram; diabetes—history of diabetes (treated or untreated); cigarette smoking—history of more than 20-pack years, currently smoking or not; cardiac disease—history of either congestive heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, pacemaker, or atrial fibrillation; alcohol intake—history of heavy alcohol intake defined as >12 oz of wine, 24 oz of beer, or 3 oz of liquor per day; hypercholesterolemia—abnormal cholesterol elevation by history (treated or untreated) or documented during hospitalization.

After review of the entire medical record, stroke type was assigned to each subject based on uniform diagnostic criteria. Lacunar, atherothrombotic, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, hemorrhagic infarct, cardioembolic, TIA, "unknown," and "other" strokes were identified. TIA was defined as stroke symptoms resolving within 24 hours.

Criteria for lacunar infarction included an appropriate clinical syndrome with or without lesion on CT and/or MRI scan, or an atypical clinical syndrome with a sub-cortical lesion <1.5 cm diameter on CT and/or MRI. Less than 50% ipsilateral carotid stenosis by ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, or conventional angiography, and negative testing for potential cardioembolic source were required. A history of diabetes mellitus or hypertension was supportive.

Criteria for atherothrombotic infarction included an appropriate clinical syndrome with or without lesion on CT and/or MRI or an atypical syndrome with an appropriate scan lesion. Greater than 50% stenosis of an appropriate large artery and negative cardiac evaluation were required. A history of previous TIAs in the same vascular territory was supportive.

Criteria for intraparenchymal hemorrhage included appropriate clinical syndrome with CT and/or MRI findings compatible with intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Hemorrhages related to trauma, aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation rupture were excluded.

Criteria for cardioembolic stroke included an appropriate clinical syndrome with or without lesion on CT and/or MRI or an atypical clinical syndrome with an appropriate scan lesion. Cardiac evaluation disclosing a potential intracardiac or transthoracic (paradoxical) embolic source and absence of relevant cerebrovascular stenosis were required. Evidence of stroke in more than one vascular territory was supportive.

A stroke was classified as "unknown" when criteria for the above categories could not be fulfilled or when two or more causes could not be differentiated.

"Other" strokes were those caused by conditions such as migraine, vessel dissection, vasculitis, or coagulopathies. Hemorrhagic infarctions were included in this category because numbers were small (1.2% for white, 2.5% Hispanic, and 1.2% Native American).

"Time-to-examination" was defined as the time between symptom onset to time of examination at our facility.

"Outcome" was defined as either favorable (discharged to home or to a rehabilitation facility) or unfavorable (discharged to long-term care facility or death).

Statistical Analysis
Differences were determined by {chi}2 and ANOVA methodology where appropriate. Significance was defined as P<.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Seventy-five percent of our patients were white, 14% Hispanic, 5% Native American, and 6% other. This distribution is representative of the proportion of each of these ethnic groups within the Arizona population.14

Sociodemographics and Risk Factors
Mean age at stroke onset was significantly lower in Native Americans than Hispanics and whites, and age in Hispanics was significantly lower than in whites (Table 1Down). Hypertension was significantly more prevalent in Hispanics than whites. Diabetes was significantly more prevalent in Native Americans than Hispanics and whites and more prevalent in Hispanics than whites. Cigarette smoking was significantly more common in whites than Hispanics and Native Americans. Cardiac disease was significantly more prevalent in whites than Hispanics. History of hypercholesterolemia was not significantly different between the races. Heavy alcohol intake was significantly more prevalent in Native Americans than Hispanics and whites and significantly more prevalent in Hispanics than whites.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Distribution of Stroke Risk Factors by Race

Stroke Types
Hemorrhages were predominant in all races but were significantly more prevalent in Hispanics than either whites or Native Americans. Lacunes were significantly more prevalent in Native Americans than whites. Cardioembolic strokes were significantly more prevalent in whites than Hispanics. Atherothrombotic strokes occurred without significant differences between the races (Table 2Down). Fourteen percent of all patients had TIAs and were excluded from this analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Distribution of Stroke Type by Race

Outcome
Chi-square analysis detected no significant interracial outcome differences for the four known stroke types. However, analysis of each stroke type for all races together disclosed the greatest likelihood of a favorable outcome for lacunar stroke, a lesser likelihood of favorable outcome for atherothrombotic and cardioembolic strokes, and the least likelihood of favorable outcome for hemorrhages (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Relative Likelihood of Favorable and Unfavorable Outcome by Stroke Type


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our white patients exhibit the highest proportion of cardioembolic stroke. This is consistent with the higher prevalence of cardiac disease in whites. These findings are also consistent with data from both the northern Manhattan and the San Diego stroke studies with respect to comparison of whites with Hispanics.1 2 3 4 Also, the higher proportion of smokers in our white patients with stroke is consistent with the trend for more atherothrombotic strokes in whites, as well as with data regarding stroke risk from cerebral atherosclerosis.15

Our data indicate a lower age at stroke onset in Hispanics and Native Americans. Data from the northern Manhattan and San Diego stroke studies also document a tendency for younger age at stroke onset in Hispanics than in whites (67 versus 80 years in the northern Manhattan study, 60 versus 63 years in the San Diego study).2 3 4 Although it is tempting to construe the younger age at stroke onset in our Hispanics and Native Americans as an indication of poorer vascular health, census data disclose that Hispanic and Native American populations are younger than whites.16 United States census data disclose a median age in Hispanics of 26 years, in Native Americans of 27 years, and in whites of 35 years.17 Thus, our finding of a lower age at stroke onset in Hispanics and Native Americans is more likely a reflection of the generally younger ages of Hispanic and Native American populations than of poorer vascular health.

Our Hispanics with stroke have the highest proportion of hypertension, the second highest proportion of diabetes, and the second highest proportion of heavy alcohol intake. The prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in our Hispanic stroke patients is higher than in the age matched southwestern Hispanic population (72% versus 46% for hypertension, 36% versus 31% for diabetes), implying a relation between these risk factors and stroke.18 19 20 21

As in the northern Manhattan study,1 Hispanics in our study have the highest proportion of hemorrhages. This proportion is four times higher than in the northern Manhattan study1 and is likely contributed to by referral bias (hemorrhages are the most frequent stroke type for all three races in our center). However, the higher proportion of hemorrhages among Hispanics with stroke may also reflect the effects of combined risk factors. These include less vigorous blood pressure control, something that has been documented in Hispanic population studies22 23 ; sensitivity to the effect of hypertension because of relative arterial wall thinness24 ; and alcohol intake, which has been implicated as a contributor to hemorrhage,25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 and which has been identified as a potential risk factor in southwest Hispanic population studies.33 34 35

Our Native American patients have the highest proportion of diabetes mellitus and the second highest proportion of hypertension. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in our Native Americans with stroke is similar to that of the age matched Arizona Native American population (62% and 64%).36 37 The prevalence of hypertension in our Native Americans with stroke is higher than that of the age matched Arizona Native American population (71% versus 44%).38 It is not surprising that this risk factor combination is associated with a higher percentage of lacunar strokes in our Native Americans, given the documented relationship between these two risk factors and lacunar infarction in whites.39 40

Although there are definitional differences between studies, the proportion of heavy alcohol users in our Native American patients with stroke is higher than that of southwestern Native American populations in general (43% versus 22%).41 42 43 Heavy alcohol use is a documented risk factor for stroke28 30 and therefore may be a contributor in our Native American patients. The higher proportion of heavy alcohol intake in our Native Americans might have been expected to correlate with a higher percentage of hemorrhages.27 28 29 30 However, this was not the case, perhaps because of increased arterial wall thickness secondary to diabetes.

Although the proportion of smoking in our Native American stroke patients is lower than for whites and Hispanics, it is higher than that of the non-age matched southwestern Native American population (41% versus 16%).43 This raises concern about the role of smoking as a stroke risk factor for Native Americans, which could be better addressed with more specific age-focused population studies.

Although cholesterol differences between the races were not significant, the trend for hypercholesterolemia in our white patients is compatible with a higher proportion of atherothrombotic infarctions in this population. Similarly, the trend for lower cholesterol in our Hispanic patients is compatible with a higher proportion of hemorrhages. These findings are consistent with other studies, which have validated these relationships between cholesterol and stroke type.44 45

The observed favorable outcomes for lacunar and atherothrombotic infarctions and less favorable outcomes for cardioembolic strokes and hemorrhages are consistent with what is generally known about the prognosis for these stroke types.46 47 48 The lack of significant racial outcome differences for each stroke type is not necessarily surprising. We are unaware of any biological reasons why such outcome differences should exist, and there are no published data regarding outcome differences for stroke types between races.

Special Discussion
There are two large Hispanic populations in the United States. Those in the southwest (Mexican Americans) are thought to represent a genetic mixture of Spanish and Native American.49 Those in the east (Puerto Ricans and Cubans) represent a genetic mixture which is predominantly Spanish, with contributions from Africa and other European countries.50 Nonetheless, the Southwestern and Eastern Hispanic populations have similar heritable vascular risk factors: higher prevalence of diabetes and a lower prevalence of hypertension than whites.18 19 20 51 Hispanics also have a lower prevalence of cigarette smoking.52 53

Our data and those from the northern Manhattan study support the notion of similar vascular risk profiles between these two Hispanic subgroups. Both sets of data document a higher proportion of hemorrhages in Hispanics than whites, a lower proportion of cardioembolic strokes, and a slightly lower proportion of atherothrombotic strokes.1 2 These data also suggest that susceptibility to risk factors is similar between Hispanics and whites. Hispanics are known to have less cardiac disease and smoking, correlating with fewer cardioembolic and atherothrombotic strokes.18 52 The notable exception is the propensity of Hispanics to develop brain hemorrhage despite a lower general population prevalence of hypertension.1 9 This phenomenon may ultimately be explained by analysis of other risk factors in Hispanics with hemorrhage.

Native Americans are thought to have migrated to this continent from eastern Asia via the arctic regions of western Canada between the thirteenth and sixteenth centuries. Although Native American populations are geographically dispersed and culturally diverse, they have maintained a strong tendency for hypertension and diabetes mellitus and a less prominent tendency for hypercholesteremia.38 54

Native American populations appear to be susceptible to the effects of risk factors in the same way as white populations. Arizona Native Americans, for example, have a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes than Dakota Native Americans, but Dakota Native Americans have a higher rate of CHD.38 54 The explanation for more CHD in Dakota Native Americans is a higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and smoking. Hypercholesterolemia and smoking are the same risk factors for CHD as in the white population.

Our Arizona Native American patients' tendency for lacunar stroke in association with hypertension and diabetes is similar to what is known for white populations.39 The tendency for lacunar stroke would likely be applicable to all Native American populations to the extent that they share the tendency for hypertension and diabetes. Our data on risk factors and stroke types for Native Americans and similar data for CHD in Native Americans imply that specific risk factors predispose Native Americans to the same types of vascular events as they do for whites.

In summary, our white, Hispanic, and Native American stroke patients have different risk factor profiles and different proportions of stroke types. Nonetheless, the three races appear to respond to risk factors similarly. Because our hospital-based data are subject to referral bias, it will be important to corroborate these observations and conclusions with data from community studies. For now, it appears that efforts to prevent stroke in Hispanics and Native Americans should emphasize control of risk factors in the same way as is suggested for whites.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CHD = coronary heart disease
LVH = left ventricular hypertrophy
MRI = magnetic resonance imaging
TIA = transient ischemic attack

Received December 31, 1996; revision received October 2, 1997; accepted October 2, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Sacco RL, Hauser WA, Mohr JP. Hospitalized stroke in blacks and Hispanics in northern Manhattan. Stroke. 1991;22:1491–1496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke.. 1995;26:14–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnic differences in stroke risk factors among hospitalized patients with cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Neurology. 1995;45:659–663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Zweifler RM, Lyden PD, Taft B, Kelly N, Rothrock JF. Impact of race and ethnicity on ischemic stroke: the University of California at San Diego Stroke Data Bank. Stroke. 1995;26:245–248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Yatsu FM. Strokes in Asians, and Pacific-Islanders, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Circulation. 1991;83:1471–1472.[Abstract]

6. Frey JL, Jahnke HK, Bulfinch EW. Differences in stroke between white, Hispanic, and Native American populations of Arizona. Stroke. 1995;26:157. Abstract.

7. Gillum RF. Epidemiology of stroke in Hispanic Americans. Stroke. 1995;26:1707–1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Bruno A, Qualls C. Clinical features of ischemic stroke in Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in New Mexico: a study of 341 consecutive patients at two hospitals. Ethn Dis.. 1994;4:77–81.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Bruno A, Carter S, Qualls C, Nolte KB. Incidence of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in New Mexico. Neurology.. 1996;47:405–408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Aronow WS, Schoenfeld MR. Prevalence of atherothrombotic brain infarction and extracranial carotid arterial disease and their association in elderly blacks, Hispanics, and whites. Am J Cardiology. 1993;71:999–1000.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Kattapong VJ, Becker TM. Ethnic differences in mortality from cerebrovascular disease among New Mexico's Hispanics, Native Americans, and non-Hispanic whites, 1958 through 1987. Ethn Dis. 1993;3:75–82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Howard G, Anderson R, Sorlie P, Andrews V, Backlund E, Burke GL. Ethnic differences in stroke mortality between non-Hispanic whites, Hispanic whites, and blacks: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Stroke. 1994;25:2120–2125.[Abstract]

13. Gillum RF. The epidemiology of stroke in Native Americans. Stroke. 1995;26:514–521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. United States Bureau of the Census. 1990 Census:National and State Population Counts for Hispanic American. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1991.

15. DeGraba TJ, Fisher M, Yatsu FM. Atherogenesis of strokes. In: Barnett HJM, Mohr JP, Stein BM, Yatsu FM, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992: 29–48.

16. Arizona Department of Health Services. 1990 Arizona Census Population by Race/Ethnicity and by Age Group. Office of Chronic Disease Prevention, Bureau of Prevention and Health Promotion; May 1997.

17. United States Bureau of the Census. Resident Population, by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Single Years of Age: 1995; Population Paper Listing 41:Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; 1995.

18. Pappas G, Gergen PJ, Carroll M. Hypertension prevalence and the status of awareness, treatment, and control in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES). Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1431–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Stern MP, Gaskill SP, Allen CR Jr, Garza V, Gonzales JL, Waldrop RH. Cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican Americans in Laredo, Texas: I. prevalence of overweight and diabetes and distribution of serum lipids. II. prevalence and control of hypertension. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113:546–562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Harris MI. Epidemiological correlates of NIDDM in Hispanics, whites, and blacks in the U.S. population. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:(suppl 3):639–648.

21. Sorel JE, Ragland DR, Syme SL. Blood pressure in Mexican Americans, whites, and blacks: the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:370–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Haffner SM, Morales PA, Hazuda HP, Stern MP. Level of control of hypertension in Mexican American and non Hispanic whites. Hypertension. 1993;21:83–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, Cutler JA, Higgens M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. Hypertension. 1995;25:305–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. D'Augustino RB, Burke G, O'Leary D, Rewers M, Selby J, Savage PJ, Saad MF, Bergman RN, Howard G, Wagenknecht L, Haffner SM. Ethnic differences in carotid wall thickness: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Stroke.. 1996;27:1744–1749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Juvela S, Hillbom M, Palomaki H. Risk factors for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke.. 1995;26:1558–1564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Calandre L, Arnal C, Fernandez Ortega J, Bermejo F, Felgeroso B, del Ser T, Vallejo A. Risk factors for spontaneous cerebral hematomas: case-controlled study. Stroke. 1986;17:1126–1128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Klatsky AL, Armstrong MA, Friedman GD. Alcohol use and subsequent cerebrovascular disease hospitalizations. Stroke. 1989;20:741–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Gorelick PB. The status of alcohol as a risk factor for stroke. Stroke. 1989;20:1607–1610.[Free Full Text]

29. Monforte R, Estruch R, Graus F, Nicolas JM, Urbano-Marquez A. High ethanol consumption as risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage in young and middle-aged people. Stroke.. 1990;21:1529–1532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Gill JS, Shipley MJ, Tsementzis SA, Hornby RS, Gill SK, Hitchcock ER, Beevers DG. Alcohol consumption: a risk for hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic stroke. Am J Med. 1991;90:489–497.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Ojemann RG, Heros RC. Spontaneous brain hemorrhage. Stroke. 1983;14:468–475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Caplan LR. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet. 1992;339:656–658.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Jessor R, Graves TD, Hanson RC, Jessor SL. Society, personality, and deviant behavior: a study of a tri-ethnic community. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1968:184.

34. Neff JA, Hoppe SK, Perea P. Acculturation and alcohol use: drinking patterns and problems among Anglo and Mexican American male drinkers. Hispanic J Beh Sci. 1987;l9:151–181.

35. State of New Mexico Department of Health, Division of Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Planning. The New Mexico Telephone Household Survey: Assessing Alcohol and Other Drug Dependence Among Adults; Final project report. February 10, 1995.

36. Lee ET, Howard BV, Savage PJ, Cowan LD, Fabsitz RR, Oopik AJ, Yeh J, Go O, Robbins DC, Welty TK. Diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in three American Indian populations aged 45–74 years: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:599–610.[Abstract]

37. Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Hamman RF, Miller M. Diabetes incidence and prevalence in Pima Indians: a 19-fold greater incidence than in Rochester, Minnesota. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108:497–505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Welty TK, Lee ET, Yeh J, Cowan LD, Go O, Fabsitz RR, Le N, Oopik AJ, Robbins DC, Howard BV. Cardiovascular disease risk factors among American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:269–287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Chamorro A, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, Foulkes MA, Kase CS, Tatemichi TK, Wolf PA, Price TR, Hier DB. Clinical-computed tomographic correlations of lacunar infarction in the stroke data bank. Stroke.. 1991;22:175–181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Tuszynski MH, Petito CK, Levy DE. Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pathologically verified lacunar infarctions. Stroke. 1989;20:990–999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. May PA. Substance abuse and American Indians: prevalence and susceptibility. Intl J Addictions. 1982;17:1185–1209.

42. May PA, Smith MB. Some Navajo Indian opinions about alcohol abuse and prohibition: a survey and recommendations for policy. J Studies Alcohol. 1988;49:324–334.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Sugarman JR, Warren CW, Oge L, Helgerson SD. Using, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to monitor year 2000 objectives among American Indians. Pub Health Reports. 1992;107:449–456.

44. Tell GS, Crouse JR, Furberg CD. Relation between blood lipids, lipoproteins, and cerebrovascular atherosclerosis: a review. Stroke. 1988;19:423–435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Iso H, Jacobs DR, Wentworth D, Neaton JD, Cohen JD. Serum cholesterol levels and six-year mortality from stroke in 350,977 men screened for the multiple risk factor intervention trial. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:904–910.[Abstract]

46. Streifler JY, Furlan AJ, Barnett HJM. Cardiogenic brain embolism: incidence, varieties, treatment. In: Barnett HJM, Mohr JP, Stein BM, Yatsu FM, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992:967–994.

47. Mohr JP. Lacunes. In. Barnett HJM, Mohr JP, Stein BM, Yatsu FM, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992:539–560.

48. Anderson CS, Jamrozik KD, Broadhurst RJ, Stewart-Wynne EG. Predicting survival for 1 year among different subtypes of stroke: results from the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 1994;25:1935–1944.[Abstract]

49. McLemore SD, Romo R. The origins and development of the Mexican American people. In: De La Garza RO, Bean FD, Bonjean CM, Romo R, Alvarez R, eds. The Mexican American Experience: An Interdisciplinary Anthology. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press; 1985.

50. Moore J, Pachon H. Hispanics In the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1985.

51. Hanis CL, Ferrell RE, Barton SA, Aguilar L, Garza-Ibarra A, Tulloch Br, Garcia CA, Schull WJ. Diabetes among Mexican Americans in Starr County, Texas. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118:659–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Mitchell BD, Hazada HP, Haffner SM, Patterson JK, Stern MP. Myocardial infarction in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites: the San Antonio Heart Study. Circulation.. 1991;83:45–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Winkelby MA, Fortmann SP, Rockhill B. Health-related risk factors in a sample of Hispanics and whites matched on sociodemographic characteristics: the Stanford Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:1365–1375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Howard BV, Lee ET, Cowan LD, Fabsitz RR, Howard WJ, Oopik AJ, Robbins DC, Savage PJ, Yeh JL, Welty TK. Coronary heart disease prevalence and its relation to risk factors in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:254–268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
C. Ellis
Does Race/Ethnicity Really Matter in Adult Neurogenics?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2009; 18(4): 310 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Tsivgoulis, J. L. Frey, M. Flaster, V. K. Sharma, A. Y. Lao, S. L. Hoover, W. Liu, E. Stamboulis, A. W. Alexandrov, M. D. Malkoff, et al.
Pre-Tissue Plasminogen Activator Blood Pressure Levels and Risk of Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3631 - 3634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Zhang, J. M. Galloway, T. K. Welty, D. O. Wiebers, J. P. Whisnant, R. B. Devereux, J. R. Kizer, B. V. Howard, L. D. Cowan, J. Yeh, et al.
Incidence and Risk Factors for Stroke in American Indians: The Strong Heart Study
Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): 1577 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Y.-J. Shen, J. F. Yao, S. S. Brar, M. B. Jorgensen, X. Wang, and W. Chen
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Ischemic Stroke Rates and the Efficacy of Warfarin Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): 2736 - 2743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al.
Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.
Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): e873 - e923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al.
Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.
Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1583 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. M. Bravata, C. K. Wells, B. Gulanski, W. N. Kernan, L. M. Brass, J. Long, and J. Concato
Racial Disparities in Stroke Risk Factors: The Impact of Socioeconomic Status
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1507 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. P. Stansbury, H. Jia, L. S. Williams, W. B. Vogel, and P. W. Duncan
Ethnic Disparities in Stroke: Epidemiology, Acute Care, and Postacute Outcomes
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 374 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. L. Frey, H. K. Jahnke, P. W. Goslar, S. Partovi, and M. S. Flaster
tPA by telephone: Extending the benefits of a comprehensive stroke center
Neurology, January 11, 2005; 64(1): 154 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Arauz, L. Murillo, C. Cantu, F. Barinagarrementeria, and J. Higuera
Prospective Study of Single and Multiple Lacunar Infarcts Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Risk Factors, Recurrence, and Outcome in 175 Consecutive Cases
Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2453 - 2458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D. C. Suh, S.-H. Lee, K. R. Kim, S. T. Park, S. M. Lim, S. J. Kim, C. G. Choi, and H. K. Lee
Pattern of Atherosclerotic Carotid Stenosis in Korean Patients with Stroke: Different Involvement of Intracranial versus Extracranial Vessels
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2003; 24(2): 239 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. B. Morgenstern, L. Steffen-Batey, M. A. Smith, and L. A. Moye
Barriers to Acute Stroke Therapy and Stroke Prevention in Mexican Americans
Stroke, June 1, 2001; 32(6): 1360 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, K. Becker, C. D. Furberg, P. B. Gorelick, G. Hademenos, M. Hill, G. Howard, V. J. Howard, B. Jacobs, et al.
Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association
Circulation, January 2, 2001; 103(1): 163 - 182.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, K. Becker, C. D. Furberg, P. B. Gorelick, G. Hademenos, M. Hill, G. Howard, V. J. Howard, B. Jacobs, et al.
Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association
Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 280 - 299.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Saposnik, L. R. Caplan, L. A. Gonzalez, A. Baird, J. Dashe, A. Luraschi, R. Llinas, S. Lepera, I. Linfante, C. Chaves, et al.
Differences in Stroke Subtypes Among Natives and Caucasians in Boston and Buenos Aires
Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2385 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
O. Fustinoni and J. Biller
Ethnicity and Stroke : Beware of the Fallacies
Stroke, May 1, 2000; 31(5): 1013 - 1015.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Han and W. E. Haley
Family Caregiving for Patients With Stroke : Review and Analysis
Stroke, July 1, 1999; 30(7): 1478 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Bruno
Are There Differences in Vascular Disease Between Ethnic and Racial Groups?
Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 2 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bulfinch, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frey, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bulfinch, E. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Hispanic-American Health
*Native-American Health