(Stroke. 1998;29:2404-2411.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
1-Receptor Ligand 4-Phenyl-1-(4-Phenylbutyl) Piperidine Modulates Basal and N-Methyl-D-AspartateEvoked Nitric Oxide Production In Vivo
From the Departments of Neurology (A.B.) and Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (A.B., M.S., R.C.K., R.J.T., J.R.K.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and National Institute on Drug Abuse (E.D.L.), Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence to Anish Bhardwaj, MD, Neuroscience Critical Care Division, Meyer 8140, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail abhardwa{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Receptor ligands ameliorate ischemic neuronal
injury and modulate neuronal responses to
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor
stimulation. Because NMDA-evoked synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) may
play an important role in excitotoxic-mediated injury, we tested the
hypothesis that
-receptor ligands attenuate basal and NMDA-evoked NO
production in the striatum in vivo.
MethodsMicrodialysis probes were placed bilaterally into the
striatum of halothane-anesthetized adult Wistar rats. Rats were
divided into 7 treatment groups and perfused with artificial
cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing 3 µmol/L
[14C]L-arginine for 2 to 3 hours followed by
NMDA in various combinations with the following drugs:
L-nitroarginine (L-NNA); the
1-receptor
ligand 4-phenyl-1-(4-phenylbutyl) piperidine (PPBP); the selective
1-receptor antagonist
1-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4-(2'-oxoethyl) piperidine hydrobromide (DuP
734); and the noncompetitive NMDA receptor blocker MK-801 in aCSF.
Right-left differences between
[14C]L-citrulline in the effluent from rats
treated with different drug combinations were assumed to reflect
differences in NO production.
ResultsAfter a 3-hour loading period with
[14C]L-arginine, addition of 1 mmol/L
NMDA increased [14C]L-citrulline recovery
compared with aCSF alone. This NMDA-evoked increase was inhibited by
1 mmol/L of L-NNA and PPBP. Perfusion of 1 mmol/L of the
1-receptor antagonist DuP 734 with 1
mmol/L PPBP augmented NMDA-evoked
[14C]L-citrulline recovery compared with
perfusion with PPBP and NMDA. MK-801 attenuated the basal as well as
NMDA-evoked [14C]L-citrulline recovery. PPBP
did not cause any further attenuation in the basal and NMDA-evoked
[14C]L-citrulline recovery in the presence of
MK-801.
ConclusionsThese data indicate that a
1-receptor
ligand attenuates basal as well as NMDA-evoked NO production.
Because the attenuated NO production was reversed by DuP 734,
PPBP appears to act as an agonist at the
1-receptor.
Attenuated NO production by
1-receptor agonists
provides one possible mechanism for focal ischemic
neuroprotection.
Key Words: excitotoxicity ligands microdialysis nitric oxide receptors, sigma rats
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-receptor ligands have been reported to modulate
several neurotransmitter systems and affect behavior and
cognition.1 2 3 4 5 6 These ligands have been shown to
modulate neuronal responses to pharmacological
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor stimulation
in vitro7 8 and to provide ischemic
neuroprotection in vivo and in vitro.9 10 11 12 13 14
Recently, purification, molecular cloning, and high levels of
expression of the
1-binding sites in the
sterol-producing tissues have been reported.15 We
have previously demonstrated that the potent
1-receptor ligand 4-phenyl-1-(4-phenylbutyl)
piperidine (PPBP) prevents early evidence of brain injury in
rat12 and cat13 models of
transient focal ischemia. Similarly, (+)-pentazocine, another
potent
1-receptor ligand, afforded significant
neuroprotection in ischemic injury in the rat model of transient focal ischemia.14 Thus,
there appears to be a role for
-receptors in modulating
ischemic neuronal injury. Furthermore, it is postulated that
this protective action is mediated by an alteration of NMDA receptor
function.7
Excitotoxic mechanisms have been implicated in the propagation of
ischemic neuronal injury.16 Nitric oxide
(NO) plays a multifaceted role in the brain as a
neurotransmitter17 18 and a regulator of cerebral
blood flow.19 If present in abnormally high
concentrations, NO may exert neurotoxic
effects.16 20 21 Experiments in primary neuronal
cultures implicate NO as a mediator of glutamatergic neurotoxicity
acting through the NMDA receptors.16 Excessive
stimulation of NMDA receptors allows influx of calcium ions into
neurons and thereby stimulate NO synthase
(NOS).22 NO is formed from arginine by NOS, which
oxidizes a guanidino nitrogen of arginine, releasing NO and
citrulline.17 Activity of NOS in vitro can be
measured by the conversion of radiolabeled arginine to
citrulline.17 We have adapted this technique to
the in vivo setting by infusing
[14C]L-arginine into a
microdialysis probe and measuring recovery of
[14C]L-citrulline in the dialysis
effluent. We have previously shown that NMDA,
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid
(AMPA), and metabotropic glutamate receptor stimulation enhances
labeled citrulline recovery in the
hippocampus.23 24 25 Because
-ligands that
provide neuroprotection from NMDA toxicity in vitro have little
protective effect from kainate toxicity,26 we
focused on NMDA receptor activation in the present study.
Using modifications of this technique in vivo, we tested the hypotheses
that (1) NMDA-evoked NO production is attenuated by the
1-receptor ligand PPBP, (2) attenuation of
NMDA-evoked NO production by PPBP can be reversed by the
selective
1-receptor antagonist
1-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4-(2'-oxoethyl) piperidine hydrobromide (DuP
734), and (3) PPBP attenuates basal and NMDA-evoked NO
production by its interaction with the NMDA receptor.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rat's head was placed in a Kopf stereotaxic frame for placement of microdialysis cannulas into the striatum (0.5 mm anterior and 2.5 mm lateral to the bregma; depth 6 mm from the dura).27 A 2x2-mm2 area of the skull was removed with a variable-speed drill. A thin layer of bone was left intact and removed with forceps under microscopic observation to minimize trauma to the cortex. Cannulas were advanced to predetermined coordinates with a micromanipulator and were fixed in position with dental cement. The animals were then removed from the stereotaxic apparatus and allowed a 60-minute postsurgical equilibration period before the experiment began.
Microdialysis
Dialysis probes used in these studies were made according to the
description of Johnson and Justice28 and modified
by Van Wylen et al29 and as described
previously.23 24 25 The probes consisted of a
single hollow dialysis fiber, one end of which was sealed with epoxy.
The dialysis membrane diameter was 300 µm and had a molecular
mass cutoff of 5 kDa. Two hollow silica perfusion tubes were inserted
into the dialysis fiber so that their ends were 3 mm apart. The
distance between the tips constituted the effective dialyzing area of
the cannula.29 Starting 1 hour after insertion,
the cannulas were perfused at a rate of 1 µL/min. The concentration
of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) was as follows (mmol/L): NaCl
131.8, NaHCO3 24.6, CaCl2
2.0, KCl 3.0, MgCl2 0.65, urea 6.7, and dextrose
3.7. The aCSF was filtered, warmed to 37°C, and bubbled with 95%
N2/5% CO2 until
O2 and CO2 tensions were
similar to those of aCSF and brain tissue.29
Estimation of NO Production
We estimated NO production using modifications of the
assay described by Bredt et al.17 Arginine is
converted to equimolar concentrations of citrulline and NO by the
action of NOS.17 During continuous infusion of
aCSF containing 3 µmol/L
[14C]L-arginine, 20-µL effluent
dialysate samples were collected during 20-minute epochs and assayed
for [14C]L-citrulline content.
Samples were diluted with 200 µL water and poured over 0.5 mL resin
AG-50WX8 (Na+ form, pH 7.0) 400-mesh columns.
Columns were washed with 2 mL buffer containing 30 mmol/L HEPES
(pH 5.2), 3 mmol/L EDTA, and 1 mL water. Radioactivity of the flow
through the column was quantified by liquid scintillation spectroscopy.
To determine resin efficiency of arginine trapping, 20 µL aCSF
containing 3 µmol/L
[14C]L-arginine (not used for
dialysis) was diluted in 200 µL water, poured over a column, and
washed as above. Specific activity was corrected for counting
efficiency and background activity and expressed as femtomoles per
minute of perfusion. As an internal control, 100 µL aCSF not used for
dialysis was directly assayed for activity to ensure that
consistent concentrations of
[14C]L-arginine were added to the
aCSF.
Experimental Groups
Rats were divided into 7 treatment groups to receive
perfusates containing various combinations of NMDA,
L-nitroarginine (L-NNA), the
1-receptor ligand PPBP, the selective
1-receptor antagonist DuP 734, and
the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 in aCSF
containing [14C]L-arginine. In all
experimental groups, the perfusion with labeled arginine lasted 6
hours. The agonists NMDA and PPBP were added at 3 hours of perfusion to
permit time for loading of the cells with labeled arginine. The
inhibitors and antagonists (L-NNA, DuP 734,
MK-801) were added at 2 hours of perfusion to permit tissue delivery
before challenging with an agonist. Within each group, the particular
drug combination was randomly assigned to either right or left
striatum, and the effluent concentrations of
[14C]L-citrulline were compared on
a paired basis. Because recovery across the dialysis probe is
15%
to 20% in vitro and because radial diffusion is expected to rapidly
reduce the concentration of administered drugs in surrounding tissue,
we infused 1 mmol/L concentration of NMDA to presumably attain 20
to 200 µmol/L interstitial concentrations.
In group 1 (n=8), perfusion with control aCSF was compared with
perfusion with 1 mmol/L NMDA to demonstrate that NMDA enhances
citrulline recovery in the striatum. To demonstrate that NMDA-evoked
citrulline recovery is attenuated by the NOS inhibitor
L-NNA, perfusion with 1 mmol/L NMDA was compared with perfusion
with 1 mmol/L NMDA+1 mmol/L L-NNA in group 2 (n=7). In group
3 (n=8), perfusion with 1 mmol/L PPBP was compared with aCSF
perfusion to test the hypothesis that PPBP attenuates basal labeled
citrulline recovery. To test the hypothesis that NMDA-evoked NO
production is attenuated by PPBP, perfusion with 1 mmol/L
NMDA was compared with 1 mmol/L NMDA+1 mmol/L PPBP in group 4
(n=8). To test the hypothesis that PPBP does not attenuate basal
citrulline recovery in the presence of NMDA receptor blockade,
perfusion with 1 mmol/L MK-801 was compared with perfusion of
1 mmol/L MK-801+1 mmol/L PPBP in group 5 (n=8). In group 6
(n=8), 1 mmol/L NMDA+1 mmol/L MK-801 was compared with a
perfusion of 1 mmol/L NMDA+1 mmol/L MK-801+1 mmol/L PPBP
to test the hypothesis that PPBP does not attenuate NMDA-enhanced
citrulline recovery in the presence of NMDA receptor blockade. To test
the hypothesis that the attenuation of NMDA-evoked citrulline recovery
by PPBP can be reversed by the selective
1-receptor blocker DuP 734, perfusion with
1 mmol/L NMDA+1 mmol/L PPBP was compared with perfusion with
1 mmol/L NMDA+1 mmol/L PPBP+1 mmol/L DuP 734 in group 7
(n=7).
After 6 hours of perfusion, rats were killed with an intravenous injection of potassium chloride while still anesthetized, and dialysis probes were perfused with methylene blue. The brain was stored in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours and then dissected to visualize the probe tracts.
Immunohistochemical Studies
Naive rats were given intravenous heparin and were
perfused through the ascending aorta with 4%
paraformaldehyde and 1% acrolein. Brains were removed,
frozen en bloc, and stored at -80°C until processing.
Immunohistochemical experiments were performed on 40-µm floating
sections of tissue. The tissue was processed with the use of a
peroxidase/antiperoxidase detection method with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine
as the chromogen. Incubation with or without the primary antibody was
performed at 4°C for 48 hours on a rocker plate. Nonspecific binding
was inhibited by preincubating tissues with 4% goat serum. The
neuronal and endothelial NOS antibodies were polyclonal
rabbit antibodies that recognized a 155- and 135-kDa protein,
respectively.30
Materials
[14C]L-Arginine (317
mCi/mmol) was obtained from Amersham; L-NNA, NMDA, and MK-801 were
obtained from Sigma Chemical Co; PPBP was prepared by Dr Kenji
Hashimoto at the National Institute of Drug Abuse, and DuP 734 was
obtained from Dupont Co. The endothelial NOS antibody
was obtained from Transduction Laboratories.
Statistical Analysis
Within each group, the effluent citrulline data were
analyzed by 2-way ANOVA; the 2 treatments delivered to the 2
striata were 1 within-subject factor, and the 6 hourly collections were
a second within-subject factor. If the overall effect of treatment or
the treatmentxtime interaction was significant, comparisons of mean
values between the 2 treatments at individual time points were made by
orthogonal contrasts. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Data are presented as mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunohistochemistry of the neuronal and
endothelial isoforms of NOS demonstrated the presence
of the neuronal isoform in neurons and the endothelial
isoform in the endothelium of blood vessels in the
striatum of Wistar rats (Figure 1
).
|
In the microdialysis studies, all groups of animals were perfused with
aCSF containing labeled arginine bilaterally in the striatum for 3
hours before addition of NMDA or PPBP to "load" the cells with the
labeled substrate. In group 1, perfusion with
[14C]L-arginine in aCSF resulted in
time-dependent increases in
[14C]L-citrulline in the effluent.
These time-dependent increases were presumed to represent the
time required for transport of labeled arginine into the tissue and the
time required for transport of labeled citrulline back to the probe.
Upon switching the perfusion to NMDA, labeled citrulline recovery was
markedly increased during the first 20-minute collection period, and
this increase was sustained for the entire 3-hour experimental period
compared with aCSF perfusion alone (Figure 2A
). In group 2, perfusion with L-NNA
after the second hour decreased labeled citrulline recovery during the
first collection period compared with contralateral perfusion with aCSF
alone. Upon switching to the combined perfusion of NMDA+L-NNA after the
third hour, labeled citrulline recovery remained completely suppressed
compared with contralateral perfusion with NMDA alone (Figure 2B
).
|
In group 3, perfusion with PPBP decreased labeled citrulline recovery
by the first collection period compared with perfusion with aCSF alone
(Figure 3A
). Citrulline recovery remained
below basal levels for the entire 3-hour PPBP perfusion period. In
group 4, combined perfusion with NMDA+PPBP produced a rapid decrease in
labeled citrulline recovery in contrast to the increase seen with NMDA
alone (Figure 3B
). Citrulline recovery remained significantly
suppressed throughout the subsequent 3-hour perfusion period.
|
In group 5, perfusion of MK-801 bilaterally after the second hour
decreased basal labeled citrulline recovery. There was no further
decrease upon switching to perfusion with MK-801+PPBP after the third
hour compared with MK-801 alone (Figure 4A
). In group 6, perfusion of MK-801
bilaterally after the second hour decreased basal labeled citrulline
recovery bilaterally (Figure 4B
). Upon switching the perfusion to
NMDA+MK-801, there was a small time-dependent increase in labeled
citrulline recovery. Coadministration of PPBP with NMDA failed to
attenuate this increase in the presence of MK-801.
|
In group 7, perfusion with DuP 734 after the second hour did not alter
basal citrulline recovery (Figure 5
).
Coadministration of NMDA+PPBP after the third hour in the absence of
DuP 734 rapidly decreased citrulline recovery. This decrease was not
observed in the presence of DuP 734 (Figure 5
).
|
Neuronal injury was assessed by cresyl violet staining 24 hours after
removal of bilateral microdialysis probes in 3 rats. A margin of
increased cellularity surrounding the probe tract was seen both on the
side perfused for 6 hours with aCSF and on the side perfused for 6
hours with 1 mmol/L NMDA (Figure 6
).
There was no apparent difference in the thickness of this cell boundary
layer between sides, and there was no observable necrosis beyond this
boundary layer.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-receptor ligand PPBP; (3) PPBP did
not attenuate basal or NMDA-evoked citrulline recovery in the presence
of NMDA receptor blocker MK-801; and (4) the
1-receptor antagonist DuP 734
reversed the attenuating effect of PPBP on the NMDA-evoked citrulline
recovery.
Technical Considerations
In this study, the tips of the microdialysis probes were localized
in the caudate-putamen complex of the striatum, as confirmed by
postmortem infusion of methylene blue dye. It is well established that
the striatum is highly vulnerable to ischemia and excitotoxic
glutamatergic injury.31 32 33 Using
well-characterized antibodies, we confirmed the presence of neuronal
and endothelial isoforms of NOS in the striatum,
demonstrating that abundant NO synthetic mechanisms are present in
the striatum. In the present study, NMDA enhanced striatal
citrulline recovery, which was attenuated by the NOS
inhibitor L-NNA. This observation confirms our previous
findings23 25 34 demonstrating NMDA-evoked NO
production in the rat hippocampus and lamb neocortex. The
increase in radiolabeled citrulline recovery with NMDA receptor
stimulation is assumed to reflect increased NO production
because the responses were inhibited by nitroarginine in all 3 brain
regions assayed.
Citrulline recovery is only an indirect marker of NO production
in vivo because of the complex compartmental kinetics involving (1)
diffusion of labeled arginine across the dialysis membrane, (2)
diffusion through the tortuous interstitial space, (3)
cellular uptake of labeled arginine, (4) cellular efflux of
labeled citrulline, and (5) diffusion of labeled citrulline back to and
across the dialysis membrane. The time-dependent increase in recovery
of labeled citrulline during control perfusion with aCSF is presumed to
reflect this complex kinetic process rather than an actual increase in
NO synthesis over time. In our previous studies with microdialysis in
hippocampus,23 24 25 we started perfusion with
various combinations of agonists and antagonists
simultaneously with labeled arginine. In the present
study on striatum, we altered the experimental paradigm to include a
3-hour period of labeled arginine perfusion before adding an agonist.
This 3-hour loading period allowed basal citrulline recovery to
increase to levels that permitted decreases as well as increases to be
detected with various pharmacological challenges. Moreover, we were
able to reduce the sampling time from 60 to 20 minutes and thereby to
improve the time resolution. We found that agents that inhibit
citrulline recovery, such as L-NNA, PPBP, and MK-801, did so during the
first 20-minute collection with no further decreases on subsequent
samples. If the sum of the response time for the delivery of drugs
through the dialysis probes plus the response time for labeled
citrulline to be transported back across the dialysis membrane was in
the order of tens of minutes, the first 20-minute collection value
would be intermediate between the baseline and steady state values. Our
observations that the value obtained from first 20-minute sample was
close to the steady state response of these inhibitors
indicate that the overall response time of the microdialysis
system is less than a few minutes. This rapid response is
consistent with the rapid decrease in cyclic GMP in
microdialysates reported to result from nitroarginine
infusion35 36 and with the rapid spread of
infused radiolabeled sucrose from the dialysis probe (
1-mm diameter
spread by 14 minutes).35
We used bilateral microdialysis perfusion in a paired experimental
design to reduce interanimal variability arising from
physiological factors, such as arterial
blood pressure, blood gases, and depth of anesthesia. This
approach assumes that the response to NMDA would normally be equivalent
on the 2 sides in the absence of administration of an
antagonist to only 1 side. Because treatments were randomly
assigned to the left or right striatum, we did not believe it was
necessary to perform an additional control series in which both sides
received NMDA alone. It is conceivable that there are transcallosal
effects between the striatum that would influence the magnitude of the
evoked responses, but it seems unlikely that this effect would have a
major qualitative impact on left-right comparisons with unilateral
antagonist administration. When
N
-nitro-D-arginine methyl
ester was given to 1 hippocampus as a control for the NOS
inhibitor
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl
ester, the NMDA-evoked increases in citrulline recovery were equivalent
on the 2 sides.23
The 56 rats used in this study were not randomly assigned to the 7 experimental groups. Rather, the experiments for each group were performed over a 1- to 2-week period so that the same lot of labeled arginine and Dowex resin was used for each group to reduce within-group variability. Some differences in the absolute levels of citrulline recovery before addition of NMDA or PPBP are evident between different groups that received similar treatments. Some of this variability may be due to differences in the efficiency of arginine trapping by the Dowex column or to biological variability.
Although PPBP blocked the increase in citrulline recovery during the
first hour of NMDA perfusion, citrulline recovery eventually
began to increase from the low basal level (Figure 3B
). Because NMDA is
not rapidly metabolized, the tissue concentration of NMDA may have
eventually increased to a level sufficient to partially counteract the
inhibitory effect of PPBP. Even in the presence of MK-801,
there is a small increase in citrulline recovery over time (Figure 4B
).
However, the increase in citrulline with PPBP+NMDA during the last 2
hours shown in Figure 3B
is greater than that in another similarly
treated group shown in Figure 5
. As discussed above, interassay
variability and anesthetic and physiological status
of the animal may contribute to some of these differences between
animal groups. Therefore, emphasis is placed on within-group
comparisons.
Variability may also arise from tissue injury resulting from placement of a 300-µm diameter probe. We evaluated histology 24 hours after probe removal to permit time for any neuronal injury to mature. A rim of dense cellularity was observed around the probe tract that had been perfused with aCSF. However, the area of drug delivery and sampling by the microdialysis probe was much greater than this dense cellular rim. Autoradiography revealed that labeled sucrose spreads over a 1-mm diameter cylinder by 14 minutes of dialysis perfusion,35 and we have found that labeled arginine spreads 3 mm by 1 hour of infusion.25 Although probe insertion can cause transient disruption of the blood-brain barrier and an increase in the extracellular space in the immediate vicinity around the probe,36 37 the volume of tissue sampled by the probe probably extends well beyond the injured volume.
Injection of NMDA into the lateral ventricle of adult rats can cause injury to neurons and the blood-brain barrier in neighboring tissue.33 38 However, with infusion of 1 mmol/L into the dialysis probe, we did not observe substantial increases in the area of gliosis surrounding the probe tract or neuronal injury beyond the rim of gliosis. Thus, the amount of NMDA delivered into the tissue appeared to be below the toxic range.
-Receptor Ligand Effects
Others7 9 10 11 as well as our group have
demonstrated that
-receptor ligands ameliorate injury in animal
models of transient focal ischemia. The mechanism of this
protection is not completely understood. Several mechanisms of
protection for
-receptor ligands are supported by studies in vitro.
For example,
-receptor ligands inhibit ischemia-induced
glutamate release in vitro, but they do not block glutamate release
caused by high potassium or calcium.39 In
addition,
-receptor ligands, particularly
1-receptor ligands, reduce NMDA-induced
increase in intracellular calcium in isolated
neurons.40 In hippocampal slices, there was more
than an additive protective effect of combined administration of an
NMDA receptor antagonist and a
-receptor
ligand,39 presumably by decreasing the ratio of
endogenously released glutamate to antagonist
at the receptor.
-Receptor ligands that protect against glutamate
toxicity in neuronal cell culture decrease evoked increases in cyclic
GMP without directly inhibiting NOS.8 Other
neurotransmitter systems may also be involved in the neuroprotection
seen with
-receptor ligands. For example, (+)-pentazocine, as well
as other
-receptor ligands, inhibits stimulated striatal dopamine
release.5 In vivo,
-receptor ligands can
prevent cortical spreading depression.41 In our
previous studies, PPBP ameliorated ischemic injury in the cat
model of transient focal ischemia, and this neuroprotection was
not afforded by a more favorable redistribution of cerebral blood flow
or effect on temperature.13 In the rat model of
transient focal ischemia, (+)-pentazocine decreased infarction
volume, whereas (-)-pentazocine did not demonstrate any
neuroprotection.14 In the rat brain,
(+)-pentazocine is a potent ligand for the
1-receptor,42 while
(-)-pentazocine appears to be a less selective drug that has activity
primarily at µ-,
-, and
-opioid
receptors.43 Many
-receptor ligands have
alternative receptor effects that are concentration dependent. In this
regard, both PPBP and (+)-pentazocine are considered selective
1-receptor ligands,44
but at high concentrations (+)-pentazocine is also an
inhibitor of the NMDA receptor binding at the phencyclidine
site.45 Therefore, in the present study we
used PPBP as the prototype of the
1-receptor
ligands and studied its effects on basal and NMDA-evoked NO
production in vivo.
We found that administration of either PPBP or the noncompetitive NMDA
antagonist MK-801 alone rapidly suppressed citrulline
recovery. These observations suggest that tonic activation of NMDA
receptors is a major stimulus to NOS activity under basal conditions in
striatum and that
1-receptor ligands are
potent inhibitors of this basal activity. Moreover,
coadministration of PPBP with NMDA in the microdialysis infusate not
only inhibited the increase in citrulline recovery but rapidly
decreased citrulline recovery to below basal levels. Thus,
1-receptor ligands are potent
inhibitors of NMDA-evoked activation of NO
production.
-Receptor ligands may act through
-receptors or directly on the
NMDA receptor ion channel. For example,
-receptor ligands have been
reported to noncompetitively inhibit currents generated by NMDA
receptors expressed in Xenopus
oocytes,46 thereby suggesting that these ligands
can act directly on the NMDA receptor channel complex independent of
-receptors. Our observation that PPBP produced no additional
decrement of citrulline recovery in the presence of MK-801 supports
this possibility. However, MK-801 by itself reduced basal citrulline
recovery to extremely low levels. Any effect of PPBP, independent of
NMDA receptor modulation, is difficult to detect in this situation.
Moreover, a specific
1-receptor
antagonist reversed the suppressive effect of PPBP on
NMDA-evoked citrulline recovery. We therefore believe that the primary
site of action of PPBP is on
1-receptors
rather than directly on the NMDA receptor complex.
-Receptors may
act to modulate the signal transduction pathway between NMDA receptors
and NOS activation.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the
1-receptor ligand PPBP attenuates basal and
NMDA-evoked NO production in the striatum, as measured
indirectly by conversion of arginine to citrulline. This attenuation is
possibly mediated by an interaction of the
1-receptor with the signal transduction
pathway between the NMDA receptor complex and the NOS enzyme. If it is
assumed that excessive NO production during and after
ischemia is neurotoxic, this inhibition may represent
one mechanism by which
1-receptor ligands
exert their neuroprotective effect.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 14, 1998; revision received June 15, 1998; accepted August 11, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-receptor ligand, decreases brain injury after transient
focal ischemia in cats. Stroke. 1995;26:16761682.
ligands against
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and hypoxia-mediated
neurotoxicity in neuronal culture toxicity studies. Brain
Res. 1995;675:110120[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-Ligands and
non-competitive NMDA antagonists inhibit glutamate release
during cerebral ischemia. Neurosci Lett. 1990;117:169174.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-ligands of
intracellular free Ca++ mobilization by
N-methyl-D-aspartate in primary culture of rat frontal
cortical neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;275:207214.
1-receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994;266:131138.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
receptors in rat
brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;236:159163.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Department of Internal Medicine Cardiovascular Division University of Iowa College of Medicine Iowa City, Iowa
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study makes a new contribution in this area by
providing evidence that
1-receptor ligands
attenuate production of NO by nNOS under basal conditions and
in response to activation of NMDA receptors. Previous studies
suggested that
-receptor ligands have neuroprotective effects in
models of focal ischemia. Thus, inhibition of
production of NO by nNOS is a possible mechanism by which
1-receptor agonist protects brain after ischemia.
Received April 14, 1998; revision received June 15, 1998; accepted August 11, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. B. Smith, J. Duplantier, Y. Dun, B. Mysona, P. Roon, P. M. Martin, and V. Ganapathy In Vivo Protection against Retinal Neurodegeneration by Sigma Receptor 1 Ligand (+)-Pentazocine Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 4154 - 4161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Dun, M. Thangaraju, P. Prasad, V. Ganapathy, and S. B. Smith Prevention of Excitotoxicity in Primary Retinal Ganglion Cells by (+)-Pentazocine, a Sigma Receptor-1 Specific Ligand Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 4785 - 4794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jiang, B. Mysona, Y. Dun, J. P. Gnana-Prakasam, N. Pabla, W. Li, Z. Dong, V. Ganapathy, and S. B. Smith Expression, Subcellular Localization, and Regulation of Sigma Receptor in Retinal Muller Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5576 - 5582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Vagnerova, P. D. Hurn, A. Bhardwaj, and J. R. Kirsch Sigma 1 receptor agonists act as neuroprotective drugs through inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 430 - 4, table of contents. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Goyagi, T. J.K. Toung, J. R. Kirsch, R. J. Traystman, R. C. Koehler, P. D. Hurn, and A. Bhardwaj Neuroprotective {kappa}-Opioid Receptor Agonist BRL 52537 Attenuates Ischemia-Evoked Nitric Oxide Production In Vivo in Rats Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1533 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Goyagi, A. Bhardwaj, R. C. Koehler, R. J. Traystman, P. D. Hurn, and J. R. Kirsch Potent {sigma}1-Receptor Ligand 4-Phenyl-1-(4-Phenylbutyl) Piperidine Provides Ischemic Neuroprotection Without Altering Dopamine Accumulation In Vivo in Rats Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 532 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Goyagi, S. Goto, A. Bhardwaj, V. L. Dawson, P. D. Hurn, and J. R. Kirsch Neuroprotective Effect of {{sigma}}1-Receptor Ligand 4-Phenyl-1-(4-Phenylbutyl) Piperidine (PPBP) Is Linked to Reduced Neuronal Nitric Oxide Production Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1613 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Goyagi, A. Bhardwaj, P. D. Hurn, R. D Traystman, and J. R. Kirsch NEUROPROTECTIVE {alpha}1-RECEPTOR LIGAND, PPBP [4 PHENYL-1- (4-PHENYLBUTYL) PIPERIDINE] ATTENUATES ISCHEMIA-EVOKED STRIATAL NITRIC OXIDE PRODUCTION IN VIVO. Can J Anesth, June 1, 2001; 48(90001): A61 - 61. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||