Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1998;29:1821-1826

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deklunder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deklunder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, C.

(Stroke. 1998;29:1821-1826.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Microemboli in Cerebral Circulation and Alteration of Cognitive Abilities in Patients With Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves

Ghislaine Deklunder, MD, PhD; Martine Roussel, MSc; Jean-Louis Lecroart, PhD; Alain Prat, MD; Corinne Gautier, MD

From Lille University Hospital (G.D., J.-L.L., C.G.) and Charles De Gaulle University (M.R.), Lille, France.

Correspondence to Dr G. Deklunder, EFCV, Hôpital Cardiologique, CHU de Lille, av du Pr. Leclerc, F-59037 Lille Cédex, France. E-mail gdeklunder{at}chru-lille.fr


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose—It has been shown previously that cerebral microemboli may occur frequently in patients with a normal mechanical heart valve (MHV) without prior history of stroke. Some arguments strongly suggest that these microemboli have a gaseous origin. In other circumstances such as extracorporeal circulation or decompression in divers, it has been demonstrated that cerebral microbubbles could lead to some deterioration in cognitive functions. Therefore, we have studied attention and memory, which are among the most impaired cognitive functions as demonstrated in previous studies, in patients with an MHV.

Methods—Three groups of 12 volunteers each were composed of patients with an MHV and embolic signals in the cerebral circulation (group 1), patients with biological prostheses (group 2), and healthy subjects (group 3). Groups were carefully matched for age and verbal intellectual abilities. For each group, a transcranial Doppler examination was performed and a set of cognitive tests assessing sustained and selective attention and episodic and working memory was administered.

Results—The mean embolic rate was 29 per hour in patients with an MHV. No embolus was detected in the other 2 groups. Episodic memory was significantly modified in both groups 1 and 2 compared with the control group for tasks that required high-processing resources. Working memory performance was significantly decreased in MHV patients. No between-groups differences were observed for the other parameters.

Conclusions—Alteration of episodic memory can be attributed to a long-term effect of the surgical procedure. Deterioration of working memory can be related to the presence of cerebral microemboli in MHV patients.


Key Words: heart-valve prosthesis • HITS • cognitive abilities • transcranial Doppler


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Most patients who have a mechanical heart valve (MHV) prosthesis implanted exhibit high-intensity transient signals (HITS) in the cerebral circulation that are usually detected by a transcranial Doppler examination of the middle cerebral artery (MCA).1 The prevalence of HITS is high, from 50% to 100% according to some studies,2 3 4 5 and thus it has an important clinical and economic effect considering the high number of MHVs implanted in patients each year worldwide. In view of this population, the rate of HITS widely varies according to the prosthesis type, size, and status. However, the presence of HITS is also observed in patients with normally functioning MHVs and without other embolic source. In any case, the HITS rate can reach several hundreds per hour.

The nature of HITS in patients with a normal MHV is still being debated, but there are strong arguments in favor of a gaseous origin: microbubbles can be produced at the level of the valve leaflets where local high-pressure gradients are present during the cardiac cycle, especially at valve closure. These pressure gradients could lead to the appearance of a cavitation-like phenomenon that can release part of the dissolved blood gas under the form of microscopic bubbles into the circulation.6 7 8

Circulating microbubbles have been reported in other circumstances, eg, during coronary artery bypass grafting.9 10 A decline in cognitive performances of these patients has been reported, and its amplitude has been correlated to the amount of gas emboli delivered during the extracorporeal circulation (ECC). The consensus is increasing that diffuse microembolization, secondary to ECC, is the primary cause of cerebral damage in any uncomplicated open heart surgery.11 12 13 In divers, central nervous system damage has been reported using magnetic resonance imaging.14 Moreover, a direct deleterious effect of gaseous microembolization has been demonstrated on the cerebral microvasculature.15 16

These observations were made during situations of acute embolization. Although most of the chronic emboli in patients with an MHV are clinically silent, it is reasonable to assume that such repeated events could have subtle cumulative effects on the cerebral microcirculation and thus on some cerebral functions.

The presence of memory and attention disorders is frequently reported in patients with brain damage and particularly after open heart surgery.17 18 As in previous studies conducted on patients after cardiac surgery, the present study was designed to assess attention and memory of patients with MHV-associated HITS. Neuropsychological procedures were selected on the basis of their use in previous studies.

Sustained attention and selective attention were the 2 types of attention explored in this study. The assessment of short-term memory was investigated with regard to the working memory model of Baddeley.19 This model refers to a limited capacity system that is responsible for the temporary storage and processing of information while cognitive tasks are being performed. Long-term memory performance was assessed by testing the episodic memory,20 which concerns facts of personal experience.

A specifically designed battery of neuropsychological tests has been used to explore the sustained and selective attention and the working and episodic memory. This battery of tests was applied to (1) a group of patients with an MHV and repeatedly occurring HITS, (2) a group of patients having undergone a similar cardiac surgery procedure with implantation of a biological valve, and (3) a group of healthy subjects. These last 2 groups did not present any HITS.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
Patients were randomly selected from those regularly attending Lille University Hospital who also met the inclusion criteria. Control subjects were recruited by announcement, and the data obtained from this group were used as reference values for the neuropsychological tests. All subjects were informed about the study protocol and gave consent to enter the study.

Eligible subjects were tested for inclusion criteria and group matching on entry in the study. Thirty-six subjects met the inclusion and pairing criteria and were then assigned to 1 of 3 groups according to their heart valve status: group 1, 12 patients with 1 or 2 MHVs implanted and exhibiting HITS in both the left and right MCA; group 2, 12 patients with a biologic heart valve implanted and presenting no HITS; and group 3, 12 healthy control subjects, with no prostheses.

The noninclusion criteria were defined to eliminate cerebrovascular risk factors and neurological and psychological disorders. Patients with prior history of stroke, multiple sclerosis, vascular disorders with possible cerebral affection, diabetes mellitus, general psychiatric disorders, illiteracy, and pharmacological treatment known to interfere with cognitive performance were excluded on the basis of a neurological examination. Patients were then submitted to clinical and echographic cardiac examinations to exclude patients with arrhythmia, hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, dysfunction of the prosthesis, or presence of any other cardiac embolic source. Duplex carotid examination was performed to exclude subjects with significant carotid atheroma (>70% stenosis or heterogeneous and irregular plaques), which is the most common extracardiac source of cerebral microemboli.21 Blood tests were performed on MHV patients to ensure the efficiency of anticoagulation therapy. Patients with an international normalized ratio <3 were excluded. Because anxiety may affect neuropsychological performance, the anxiety test of Catell22 was administered to all subjects, and they were excluded if their scores reached the pathological anxiety level.

Patients in group 1 had a St. Jude prosthesis (St. Jude Medical, Inc) implanted in either the mitral (5 subjects) or the aortic position (5 subjects) or in both the mitral and aortic positions (2 patients). Mean time from implantation was 32 months (range 12–76 months). The prosthesis size ranged from 27 to 31 in the mitral position and from 21 to 25 in the aortic position.

Patients of group 2 had a Carpentier-Edwards prosthesis (Baxter Inc) implanted in the mitral position (7 subjects) or a Carpentier-Edwards prosthesis (2 subjects) and a Toronto SPV prosthesis (St. Jude; 3 subjects) implanted in the aortic position. Mean time from implantation was 39 months (range 18–88 months).

Subjects in the 3 groups were matched for age and verbal intellectual abilities obtained by administering the vocabulary subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R).23 This test estimates the global intellectual function that is not expected to change after a cardiac operation. Basic clinical and neuropsychological data are provided in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical and Psychological Data of Subjects

Microemboli Detection
Each subject was submitted to a transcranial sonographic examination of the left and right MCA, with the use of Acuson 128XP equipment (Acuson) and a 2-MHz sector scanning probe. The transcranial Doppler study was performed in the pulsed Doppler mode, with the guidance of color Doppler imaging. The MCA was imaged through the temporal acoustic window. The sample volume of the pulsed Doppler was placed in the first segment of the vessel, at approximately 50 mm deep; its length was 5 mm. Real-time spectrum analysis of the Doppler signal was continuously recorded for 10 minutes on each side. The Doppler spectrum and audio signals were recorded on videotape and analyzed off-line by an independent observer who was blinded to the clinical status of the subjects.

The gain of the spectrum analyzer was set up to a low value to obtain a background Doppler signal within a few color levels. The criteria used for the HITS detection were those originally proposed by Spencer1 characteristic chirping sound, initially unidirectional signal in the Doppler spectrum, random appearance within the cardiac cycle, and intensity increase >=10 dB above the background spectrum. The embolic rate was determined by counting the number of HITS during the recording period (20 minutes). Results were reported as the number of events per hour.

Cognitive Tests
Attention
Sustained-attention abilities were evaluated by a simple visual reaction time test with 100 stimuli. The visual stimulus was a red spotlight presented until the subject responded by depressing a button with his or her index finger. The subjects were told to respond as quickly as possible. At the beginning of the procedure, practice trials were administered to familiarize the subjects with the test. Reaction time was measured after each response. At the end of the task, the mean reaction time was computed.

Selective-attention abilities were assessed by a sign-crossing task. A sheet with 500 meaningless, randomized, mixed-up signs was presented to each subject. Three signs placed at the top of the sheet were designed as targets. The subject was asked to scan the sheet as quickly as possible, keeping errors to a minimum, and to cross the target signs each time he or she found one of them. The time used to complete the task was measured as well as the number of correct responses (targets crossed) and false alarms (nontargets crossed).

Focused attention and inhibition abilities were assessed using an adaptation of the Stroop24 color task. In this task, a list of words printed in colored ink was presented to each subject. First, he or she was asked to read the list of words as quickly and accurately as possible. The time to read the list and the number of reading errors were counted. Afterward, each subject was asked to name the color of ink in which the word was presented. The time to name the colors and the number of naming errors were counted. Interference was evidenced by the time ratio of the 2 parts of the task: time to name the colors/time to read the words.

Memory
Episodic memory was assessed by asking the subject to learn and recall a 12-word list.25 The words were read to the subject at a rate of 1 word every 2 seconds. Immediately after this reading, the subject was asked to recall the words. The number of correct recalls and intrusions was counted. Ten minutes after the free recall, a recognition task was performed. A list of 36 words containing the 12 target words among 24 distractors was presented to the subject; for each word, he or she was asked to say whether or not the word was learned earlier. The number of correct and false recognitions was counted.

Episodic memory was also tested by using an adaptation of the paradigm of Smith and Milner.26 The subject named and evaluated the price of 16 miniature articles representing real-life objects (eg, chair, chest, bottle of milk); the subject was instructed that a recall of the articles would be asked later. Afterward, the subject was asked to recall most of the previously presented articles. A recognition stage was performed in which the subject was presented a list of 48 words, including the name of the 16 learned articles among 32 distractors. Each word was read to the subject who had to indicate whether or not the article was in the ones presented. Performance was assessed by the number of items correctly recalled during the recall task and the number of correct and false recognitions during the recognition task.

The visuospatial working memory task was assessed using a modified version of the task developed by Peterson and Peterson.27 The subject was presented with 3 visual meaningless signs that had to be recognized after a delay (7 seconds), during which he or she was distracted by a subsidiary task. The subsidiary task consisted of counting backward by sevens during 7 seconds from a random number given orally by the examiner. At the beginning of the procedure, practice trials were administered to familiarize the subject with the test. The subject was tested on 12 trials. The dependent variables were the number of correct recalls and the number of false recognitions.

Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA with a post hoc Student t test to compare the cognitive abilities of the 3 groups. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Values are reported as mean±SD.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The mean HITS rate of patients in group 1 was 29 per hour (range 12–60 per hour). There was no significant difference in HITS rate between the left or right MCA (mean paired difference=1.3±1.8). No HITS were observed in groups 2 and 3.

Intellectual level assessed by the WAIS-R with the vocabulary and digital symbol subtests did not significantly differ among the 3 groups: (F2,33=0.04, P=NS), (F2,33=0.66, P=NS), and (F2,33=0.42, P=NS), respectively (Table 1Up). The results of the cognitive tests are presented in Table 2Down for each group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Scores for Reaction Time, Sign-Crossing Test, Stroop Color Test, and Episodic Memory and Working Memory Tasks

Attention Evaluation
There was no significant difference between the 3 groups concerning the simple reaction time (F2,33=0.071, P=NS). The number of correct responses and false alarms was not significantly different across groups for the sign-crossing task (F2,33=0.35, P=NS; F2,33=0.72, P=NS). The time required for the task completion did not significantly differ across groups (F2,33=0.19, P=NS), and no significant difference was found for the Stroop24 interference task (F2,33=0.07, P=NS).

Memory Evaluation
Episodic Memory
There was no significant difference between groups for the free recall of the 12-word list (F2,33=1.55, P=NS), the number of correct recalls (F2,33=2.17, P=NS), or the number of false alarms in the recognition task (F2,33=2.43, P=NS). However, there was a significant difference between groups for correct recalls (F2,33=16.95, P<0.05), with a lower performance in groups 1 and 2 compared with the control group, as assessed by the paradigm of Smith and Milner.26 Post hoc analysis showed significant differences between groups 1 and 3 (t22=5.47, P<0.01) and between groups 2 and 3 (t22=5.96, P<0.05) but no differences between groups 1 and 2. The recognition task did not differ across groups in the number of correct responses (F2,33=1.36, P=NS) or false alarms (F2,33=2.57, P=NS).

Working Memory
There was a significant difference between groups in the number of correct responses for the working memory task (F2,33=4.13, P<0.05), with a lower performance in group 1 (Table 2Up). Post hoc analysis showed that the performance in group 1 was lower compared with group 2 (t22=2.26, P<0.05) and the control group (t22=2.63, P<0.05).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Doppler ultrasonography has been used for years to investigate gas bubbles in blood vessels under various circumstances28 29 30 31 and more recently to detect formed element emboli.32 33 In experimental studies, it has been demonstrated that various embolic materials, including fat, gas, and thrombus and platelet aggregates, can be detected with ultrasonography.34 The power of backscattered ultrasound depends, to a large extent, on the size and acoustic impedance of particles in the blood. When circulating emboli are either much larger, eg, formed emboli, or of greatly different acoustic impedance, eg, gas microbubbles, than individual blood cells, they result in an increased Doppler signal power that can be easily detected, the so-called HITS.35 The embolic events may occur, and HITS may be detected in different vascular regions, depending on the location of the embolic source, and in any vascular bed, if a cardiac source is concerned. However, special attention has been focused on the cerebral circulation because stroke is a major concern.

HITS are commonly reported in the cerebral circulation of patients with MHVs.3 5 The embolic signals recorded from these patients have been described as being more intense than those found in patients with other potential embolic sources2 36 and thus are likely to be due to large solid emboli or gaseous bubbles that have a high-ultrasound reflectivity. Several arguments have been made in favor of a gaseous origin of HITS associated with MHV and have been previously discussed.6 Among these arguments, the lack of relationship between the degree of anticoagulation, antithrombotic, or antiplatelet therapy and the HITS rate must be highlighted.37 38 39 Moreover, microembolic signals are not observed in normally functioning biological valves.40 A low HITS rate has however been reported in patients with biological prostheses. It must be stressed that in these reports there was no valve nor carotid control, and the microemboli observed could be of a solid nature.4 41

It can be assumed that microbubbles are generated by the sharp MHV motion, creating a local, transient, high-pressure gradient that may cause a cavitation-like phenomenon, especially during closure, as demonstrated in vitro.8 Microbubbles can survive in the vessels, as demonstrated by decompression follow-up28 or detection of echo contrast agents far from the injection site,42 and therefore can be detected in the arteries, downstream to the prosthesis.

From the literature, it seems that some cognitive abilities are impaired in up to two thirds of patients in the early stages after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with the preoperative status.18 The origin of the cerebral injury after cardiac surgery is probably multifactorial and is still being debated,43 because the neuropsychological impairment observed in open heart patients can be caused by both the severe preexisting cardiac disease and the cardiac surgical procedure itself. However, the cause seems mainly related to prolonged or severe hypoperfusion and to gaseous emboli from the bypass circuit.11 12 The cognitive impairments are reversible in some patients but not in others, in whom impairment still can be observed 2 months17 or 6 months44 later. The cognitive impairment severity seems to be causally related to the bypass duration and the number of microemboli delivered during surgery.10 Because gaseous microemboli delivered during the course of a few hours (duration of surgery) are able to induce some transient or even persisting neuropsychological alterations, it may be hypothesized that the chronic microembolization occurring in patients with an MHV can induce comparable effects. These neurological effects are possibly related to the memory complaints reported by the patients with an MHV.

The present study was designed with 2 control groups. A true control group was composed of healthy subjects to obtain reference values; this is mandatory when nonstandard neuropsychological tests are used and when normative data are not available. The second control group was composed of patients with a biological valve prosthesis implanted. These subjects underwent a similar surgical procedure compared with the subjects who had an MHV implanted. Moreover, the preoperative medical history and disease were similar for the patients of these 2 groups. The formation of the second control group was necessary because it is difficult to have a group of patients with an MHV and free of HITS, whereas most patients with normal biological prostheses do not exhibit HITS.40 This design was expected to discriminate the effects of surgery and microembolization from MHV.

Time from implantation was of similar length in the 2 surgical groups (mean time 32 and 39 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively). It can be assumed that the long-term effect of ECC on cognitive functions was similar in both groups 1 and 2. However, the 2 groups differ after surgery: patients in group 1 showed HITS in their cerebral circulation from implantation whereas patients included in group 2 did not show any HITS. It has been demonstrated that the embolic rate is stable for 1 year in MHV patients (50 patients with St. Jude prostheses, G. Deklunder, unpublished data, 1994; Reference 4545 ). Group 1 of the present study consisted of patients who experienced a stable, repeated microembolization for 12 to 76 months.

The neuropsychological tests used in this study concern the cognitive abilities that are likely to be affected after cardiac surgery,46 47 eg, psychomotor speed, attention, and new learning abilities. Parts of these tests derived for the present study have been described in the experimental cognitive literature.

Contrary to previous postcardiac surgery studies, a decrement in attentional performance was not found in the present study nor was there a slowing of patient responses in the reaction time test. It must be emphasized that the reaction time test used in the present study involved only simple stimuli and simple motor responses whereas other investigators have used reaction time tests involving more complex cognitive processes.17 The discrepancy between the results then can be attributed to different memory loads or different general difficulty levels of the tasks. Nevertheless, because the time of the postoperative testing interval is longer than in the previous studies (32 months), the observed normal attentional performance could be due to a progressive reversibility of the impaired process. Otherwise, this reversibility implies that the brain aggression provoked by the acute microembolization during ECC and the chronic microembolization produced by an MHV is of a different nature.

For episodic memory, a lower performance was observed in the 2 groups of patients with prosthetic valves implanted but only as assessed with the procedure of Smith and Milner.26 In this paradigm, the subjects must name the presented objects and evaluate the price. Thus, the encoding process is double (visual and verbal) and deeper compared with the 12-word list test. In healthy control subjects, this encoding process resulted in a higher percentage of recalled items in the paradigm of Smith and Milner compared with the 12-word list test. On the contrary, patients with prosthetic valves implanted performed worse and did not seem to benefit from the deeper encoding process. The difference between the results in controls and patients could be interpreted as a difference in encoding strategy. Therefore, the long-term memory impairment observed in the 2 groups of patients with prosthetic valves could be attributed to a common surgical event that is probably an ECC effect.

The task of Peterson and Peterson27 used in the present study has been shown to be highly sensitive to the effects of brain injury.48 The results obtained with this task point out a short-term memory deficit in the patients with an MHV whereas patients with biological valves and controls present comparable performance. Because of time constraints for the subjects, the design of the neuropsychological test battery did not address all the subsystems of the short-term memory defined in the model of Baddeley.19 Consequently, it is not possible to adequately identify the specific components of the model that may be affected by the presence of an MHV prosthesis. Whatever the exact mechanism, this impairment has an important clinical implication because it could be related to the presence of repeated microemboli in patients with an MHV. It must be stressed that microemboli production is causally related to the mechanical properties of the prosthesis and that its prevalence is high in any type of commercially available mechanical valve.

Nevertheless, the small size of the groups in the present study does not allow for definite conclusions and does not yield the possibility of determining a relationship between the HITS rate and the degree of cognitive impairment. A serial study that is based on this experiment and that uses a refined battery of tests is currently being conducted to analyze the cumulative effects of microemboli on brain morphology and cognitive functions and to specify the components of the Baddeley19 memory model that are affected.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank K. Dujardin, PhD, Charles De Gaulle University, and O. Godefroy, MD, PhD, Lille University Hospital, for valuable advice in the design of this study and in the interpretation of the results.

Received February 13, 1998; revision received May 25, 1998; accepted June 26, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Spencer MP. Detection of cerebral arterial emboli. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R, eds. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1992:215–230.
  2. Dauzat M, Deklunder G, Aldis A, Rabinovitch M, Burte F, Bret PM. Gas bubble cerebral emboli detected by transcranial Doppler sonography in patients with prosthetic heart valves. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:129–135.[Abstract]
  3. Deklunder G, Dauzat M, Aldis A, Burte FM, Stewart SF, Houdas Y. Microbubbles cerebral emboli detected by transcranial sonography in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 1993;8:I-223. Abstract.
  4. Rams JD, Davis DA, Lolley DM, Berger MP, Spencer M. Detection of microemboli in patients with artificial heart valves using transcranial Doppler: preliminary observations. J Heart Valve Dis. 1993;2:37–41.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Braekken SK, Russell D, Brucher R, Svennevig J. Incidence and frequency of cerebral embolic signals in patients with a similar bileaflet mechanical heart valve. Stroke. 1995;26:1225–1230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Deklunder G, Savoye C, Coquet B, Lecroart JL, Houdas Y. Transcranial high intensity Doppler signals in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses: their relationship with abnormal intracavitary echoes. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5:662–667.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Mackay TG, Georgiadis D, Grosset DG, Lees KR, Wheatley DJ. On the origin of cerebrovascular microemboli associated with prosthetic heart valves. Neurol Res. 1995;17:349–352.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Graf T, Fischer H, Reul H, Rau G. Cavitation potential of mechanical heart valve prostheses. Int J Artif Organs. 1991;14:169–174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Robinson M, Blumenthal JA, Burker EG, Hlatki M, Reves JG. Coronary artery bypass grafting and cognitive function: a review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1990;10:180–189.
  10. Padayachee TS, Parsons S, Theobold R. Detection of microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass: a transcranial Doppler ultrasound investigation using membrane and bubble oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44:298–302.[Abstract]
  11. Stump DA, Rogers AT, Hammon JW, Newman SP. Cerebral emboli and cognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:113–119.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Benedict RH. Cognitive function after open-heart surgery: are postoperative neuropsychological deficits caused by cardiopulmonary bypass? Neuropsychol Rev. 1994;4:223–255.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrison M, Newman S. The impact of microemboli cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393–1399.[Abstract]
  14. Reul J, Weiss J, Jung A, Willmes K, Thron A. Central nervous system lesions and cervical disc herniations in amateur divers. Lancet. 1995;345:1403–1405.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Steinberg GK, De La Paz R, Mitchell SM, Bell TE, Albers GW. MRI and cerebrospinal fluid enzymes as sensitive indicators of subclinical cerebral injury after open-heart valve replacement surgery. Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:205–212.[Abstract]
  16. Hills BA, James PB. Microbubble damage to the blood-brain barrier: relevance to decompression sickness. Undersea Biomed Res. 1991;18:111–116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Smith PL, Treasure T, Newman SP, Joseph P, Ell P, Scheidau A, Harrison M. Cerebral consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass. Lancet. 1986;1:823–825.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Shaw PJ, Bates D, Cartlidge NEF, French JM, Heaviside D, Julian DG, Shaw DA. Early intellectual dysfunction following coronary bypass surgery. Q J Med. 1986;225:59–68.
  19. Baddeley AD. In: Working Memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1986.
  20. Tulving E. Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W, eds. Organization of Memory. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1972.
  21. Wolf PA, Kannel WB, McGee DL. Prevention of ischemic stroke: risk factors. In: Barnett HJM, Stein BM, Mohr JP, Tatsu FM, eds. Stroke, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1986:967–988.
  22. Catell J. Test d'évaluation de l'anxiété. Editions du centre de psychologie appliquée. Paris, France; 1961.
  23. Wechsler D. WAIS-R Manual. San Antonio, Tex: Psychological Corp; 1981.
  24. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18:643–661.
  25. Dujardin K. Modification des processus cognitifs au cours du vieillissement: une approche fonctionnelle par la mesure d'indices électrophysiologiques. Lille, France: Université de Lille III; 1992. Thesis.
  26. Smith ML, Milner B. The role of the right hippocampus in the recall of spatial location. Neuropsychologia. 1981;19:781–793.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Peterson LR, Peterson MJ. Short term retention of individual verbal items. J Exp Psychol. 1959;58:193–198.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Spencer MP, Clarke HF. Precordial monitoring of pulmonary gas embolism and decompression bubbles. Aerospace Med. 1972;43:762–767.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Lafortune M, Chinh Trinh B, Burns P, Breton G, Burke M, Dery R, Gianfelice D, Philie M, Cote J. Air in the portal vein: sonographic and Doppler manifestations. Radiology. 1991;180:667–670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Deverall PB, Padayachee PS, Parsons S, Theobold R, Battistessa SA. Ultrasound detection of microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1988;2:256–260.[Abstract]
  31. Nemec JJ, Marwick TH, Lorig RJ, Davison MB, Chimowitz MI, Litowitz H, Salcedo EE. Comparison of transcranial Doppler ultrasound and transesophageal contrast echocardiography in the detection of interatrial right to left shunts. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:1498–1502.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Spencer MP, Thomas GI, Nicholls SC, Sauvage LR. Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Stroke. 1990;21:415–423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Reis S, Schminke U, Daffertshoffer M, Schindlmayr C, Hennerici M. High intensity transient signals and carotid artery disease. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995;5:124–127.
  34. Markus HS, Brown MM. Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model. Stroke. 1993;24:1–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tegeler CH. High-intensity transient signals detected by Doppler ultrasonography: searching for answers. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:379–382.
  36. Grosset DG, Georgiadis D, Kelman AW, Lees KR. Quantification of ultrasound emboli signals in patients with cardiac and carotid disease. Stroke. 1993;24:1922–1924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Georgiadis D, Mallinson A, Grosset DG, Lees KR. Coagulation activity and emboli counts in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves. Stroke. 1994;25:1211–1214.[Abstract]
  38. Sturtzenegger M, Beer JH, Rihs F. Monitoring combined antithrombotic treatments in patients with prosthetic heart valves using transcranial Doppler and coagulation markers. Stroke. 1995;26:63–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Muller HR, Burckhardt D, Casty M, Pfisterer ME, Buser MW. High intensity transcranial Doppler signals (HITS) after prosthetic valve implantation. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;3:602–606.
  40. Deklunder G, Dauzat M, Gautier C, Houdas Y. Microbubble cerebral emboli in patients with prosthetic heart valves: biological versus mechanical prostheses. In: Gabbay S, Frater RWM, eds. New Horizons and the Future of Heart Valve Bioprostheses. Austin, Tex: Silent Partner; 1994:3–12.
  41. Grosset DG, Cowburn P, Georgiadis D, Dargie HJ, Faichney A, Lees KR. Ultrasound detection of cerebral emboli in patients with prosthetic heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:128–132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Mattrey RF, Steinbach GC. Ultrasound contrast agents: state of the art. Invest Radiol. 1991;26:S5–S11.
  43. Malheiros SMF, Brucki SMD, Gabbai AA, Bertolucci PHF, Juliano Y, Carvalho AC, Buffolo E. Neurological outcome in coronary artery surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995;92:256–260.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Savageau JA, Stanton BA, Jenkins CD, Frater RWM. Neuropsychological dysfunction following elective cardiac operation: a six months reassessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;84:595–600.[Abstract]
  45. Georgiadis D, Kaps M, Siebler M, Hill M, König M, Berg J, Kahl M, Zunker P, Diehl B, Ringelstein EB. Variability of Doppler microembolic signal counts in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves. Stroke. 1995;26:439–443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Blumenthal JA, Madden DJ, Burker EJ. A preliminary study of the effects of cardiac procedures on cognitive performance. Int J Psychosom. 1991;38:13–16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Stump DA. Selection and clinical significance of neuropsychologic tests. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1340–1344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Morris RG. Working memory in Alzheimer-type dementia. Neuropsychology. 1994;8:544–554.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
R. A. Rodriguez, M. Ruel, M. Labrosse, and T. Mesana
Transcranial Doppler and acoustic pressure fluctuations for the assessment of cavitation and thromboembolism in patients with mechanical heart valves
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 179 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Skjelland, A. Michelsen, F. Brosstad, J. L. Svennevig, R. Brucher, and D. Russell
Solid Cerebral Microemboli and Cerebrovascular Symptoms in Patients With Prosthetic Heart Valves
Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1159 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Guerrieri Wolf, B. P. Choudhary, Y. Abu-Omar, and D. P. Taggart
Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization after biologic and mechanical aortic valve replacement: Investigation with multirange and multifrequency transcranial Doppler ultrasound
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 512 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Dittrich and E. B. Ringelstein
Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Microembolic Signals During or After Cardiosurgical Procedures
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 503 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. di Marco, S. Grendene, G. Feltrin, D. Meneghetti, and G. Gerosa
Antiplatelet therapy in patients receiving aortic bioprostheses: A report of clinical and instrumental safety
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1597 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. G. Wolf, Y. Abu-Omar, B. P. Choudhary, D. Pigott, and D. P. Taggart
Gaseous and solid cerebral microembolization during proximal aortic anastomoses in off-pump coronary surgery: The effect of an aortic side-biting clamp and two clampless devices
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N C Radu, E W M Kirsch, M-L Hillion, F Lagneau, L Drouet, and D Loisance
Embolic and bleeding events after modified Bentall procedure in selected patients
Heart, January 1, 2007; 93(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Purandare, A. Burns, K. J Daly, J. Hardicre, J. Morris, G. Macfarlane, and C. McCollum
Cerebral emboli as a potential cause of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: case-control study
BMJ, May 13, 2006; 332(7550): 1119 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Zimpfer, M. Czerny, P. Schuch, R. Fakin, C. Madl, E. Wolner, and M. Grimm
Long-Term Neurocognitive Function After Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 29 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. H. Thoennissen, M. Schneider, A. Allroggen, M. Ritter, R. Dittrich, C. Schmid, H. H. Scheld, E. B. Ringelstein, and D. G. Nabavi
High level of cerebral microembolization in patients supported with the DeBakey left ventricular assist device
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1159 - 1166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Barak and Y. Katz
Microbubbles: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2918 - 2932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
Y. Carrascal, E. Casquero, J. Gualis, S. Di Stefano, S. Florez, E. Fulquet, J. R. Echevarria, and L. Fiz
Cognitive decline after cardiac surgery: proposal for easy measurement with a new test
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2005; 4(3): 216 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M. Perthel, S. Kseibi, A. Bendisch, and J. Laas
Use of a dynamic bubble trap in the arterial line reduces microbubbles during cardiopulmonary bypass and microembolic signals in the middle cerebral artery
Perfusion, May 1, 2005; 20(3): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M. W Hall, R. O Hopkins, J. W Long, S F. Mohammad, and K. A Solen
Hypothermia-induced platelet aggregation and cognitive decline in coronary artery bypass surgery: a pilot study
Perfusion, May 1, 2005; 20(3): 157 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. W. Droste, T. Beyna, B. Frye, V. Schulte, E. B. Ringelstein, and R. M. Schaefer
Reduction of circulating microemboli in the subclavian vein of patients undergoing haemodialysis using pre-filled instead of dry dialysers
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2377 - 2381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. Milo, E. Rambod, C. Gutfinger, and M. Gharib
Mitral mechanical heart valves: in vitro studies of their closure, vortex and microbubble formation with possible medical implications
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 24(3): 364 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M. Perthel, S. Kseibi, A. Bendisch, and J. Laas
The dynamic bubble trap reduces microbubbles in extracorporeal circulation and high intensity transient signals in the middle cerebral artery: a case report
Perfusion, September 1, 2003; 18(5): 325 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. G. Nabavi, J. Stockmann, C. Schmid, M. Schneider, D. Hammel, H. H. Scheld, and E. B. Ringelstein
Doppler microembolic load predicts risk of thromboembolic complications in Novacor patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 160 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Laas, S. Kseibi, M. Perthel, A. Klingbeil, L'E. El-Ayoubi, and A. Alken
Impact of high intensity transient signals on the choice of mechanical aortic valve substitutes
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 93 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Georgiadis, A. Studer, R.W. Baumgartner, and H.R. Zerkowski
Clinical relevance of microembolic signals in patients with prosthetic heart valves
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 22(3): 490 - 491.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J.C. de la Torre
Alzheimer Disease as a Vascular Disorder: Nosological Evidence
Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 1152 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. W. Droste, K. Kuhne, R. M. Schaefer, and E. B. Ringelstein
Detection of microemboli in the subclavian vein of patients undergoing haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration using pulsed Doppler ultrasound
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 462 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. Georgiadis, S. Braun, F. Uhlmann, G. M. Bernacca, W. J. Schulte-Mattler, S. Zierz, and H. R. Zerkowski
Doppler microembolic signals in patients with two different types of bileaflet valves
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2001; 121(6): 1101 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Rolle, J. Pengloan, M. Abazza, J. M. Halimi, M. Laskar, L. Pourcelot, and F. Tranquart
Identification of microemboli during haemodialysis using Doppler ultrasound
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1420 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]