From the Neurology Service/IDIBAPS (A.C., N.V., E.E., W.S., R.B.) and
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (C.A.), Hospital Clínic,
Barcelona, Spain.
Correspondence to Angel Chamorro, MD, Neurology Service, Hospital Clínic, 170 Villarroel, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail chamorro{at}medicina.ub.es
MethodsFour hundred eighty-one consecutive ischemic
stroke patients were admitted to the Neurology Service within
20.9±10.5 hours of symptoms onset as part of the Barcelona Downtown
Stroke Registry, including 235 patients who received oral
antihypertensive agents within <24 hours after stroke onset.
Demographic, clinical (Mathew scale), and CT scan findings were
collected prospectively. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was
recorded before hospital arrival and at 7 AM on days 1,
2, and 7 of hospitalization. The primary end point was complete
functional recovery at day 7 defined as a score of 0 to 1 on the
modified Rankin scale.
ResultsTwo hundred fifty-two patients achieved complete
recovery on day 7. Using logistic regression, independent predictors of
complete recovery included mild impairment at stroke
presentation, lack of history of hypertension, and absence
of brain edema on CT scan. Also, a 20% to 30% drop in MAP on day 2
after stroke onset almost tripled the odds of full recovery (odds
ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.3). MAP tended to normalize after stroke
in all subjects, more rapidly if hypotensive agents were administered.
Brain edema was also less frequent in patients with a greater drop in
blood pressure. Despite the fact that a drop in MAP >30% from
baseline was observed in 49 patients, this preceded worsening stroke in
only 4 patients. Conversely, worsening stroke occurred in 51 patients
despite stable blood pressure.
ConclusionsThese results suggest that complete recovery in
ischemic stroke is facilitated by a moderate blood pressure
reduction when brain edema develops, most likely as the result of a
more adequate cerebral perfusion pressure. Conversely, stroke worsening
due to pharmacological hypoperfusion is exceptional.
History of arterial hypertension was defined in subjects
who were taking hypotensive drugs regularly before the index event.
History of diabetes, coronary heart disease, smoking, or
hyperlipidemia were defined according to standard
criteria. In-hospital blood pressure was measured by nursing staff
using a calibrated sphygmomanometer with the patients in a supine
position; disappearance of the Korotkoff phase-5 sound was defined as
diastolic blood pressure. Baseline blood pressure referred
to values obtained during hospital transportation or at the ER. Mean
arterial pressure (MAP), defined as
{(diastolic blood pressure)+1/3[(systolic blood
pressure) - (diastolic blood pressure)]} in
mm Hg, was also recorded at 7 AM on days 1, 2, and
7 of hospitalization. Drop in MAP on days 1, 2, and 7 was calculated
according to the formula {[(Follow-up MAP) - (baseline MAP) /
(baseline MAP)]x100}. A drop in MAP of >30% from baseline values
was defined as significant blood pressure reduction.
Statistical analysis
Time from baseline MAP measurement to the 7 AM day 1
measurement was 959±629 minutes for patients with mild stroke on
admission and 856±631 minutes for those with moderate-to-severe stroke
on admission (nonsignificant differences). Overall, there was a
tendency toward progressive reduction in MAP over time. Probably due to
the phenomenon of the regression toward the
mean,30 the decline was greater in patients with
higher baseline values. Yet, after adjusting for unbalanced baseline
values, patients who received antihypertensive agents had a greater
drop in MAP after admission than untreated patients. The differences
were statistically significant on day 2 after stroke onset
(14.1±15.3% versus 10.3±5.4%; P<0.05). On the contrary,
the relative blood pressure drop observed on day 1 between treated and
untreated patients (7.2±16.3 versus 5.2±14.3) did not reach
statistical significance, possibly because the medication had been
administered orally.
Predictors of Functional Recovery
Clinical Worsening and Blood Pressure Course
The prognostic significance of poststroke hypertension is undetermined
in part by the fact that most previous studies grouped together
patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic
stroke,2 9 11 15 despite the fact that the
clinical effects of elevated blood pressure might differ between the
two conditions.31 Carlberg and
colleagues5 found admission blood pressure to be
unrelated to clinical outcome except in patients with impaired
conscious levels, in whom increased blood pressure was associated with
a worse prognosis. Others,32 33 found very high
blood pressure on admission to be associated with a greater stroke
mortality. Conversely, Allen34 reported that
higher systolic blood pressure on admission indicated a good
outcome, and Jørgensen and colleagues15
found an inverse relationship between high systolic pressure
and the risk of further progression. Moreover, the value of
pharmacological hypotension has not been addressed specifically in
acute stroke trials, although some indirect
data35 and a few case
reports10 11 12 warn against excessive blood
pressure lowering in stroke patients. Thus, the Intravenous
Nimodipine West European Stroke Trial study36 had to
be terminated prematurely because of unexpected safety problems
involving hemodynamic effects of the
intravenous administration of nimodipine to
ischemic stroke patients. It is likely that the clinical
repercussion of blood pressure lowering in acute stroke depends greatly
on the rate at which normotension is achieved, in addition to the
manifold effects that different antihypertensive agents might have on
cerebral blood flow, autoregulation, and intracranial
pressure.36
Several limitations of the study deserve explanation. Allocation to
hypotensive medication was not randomized but depended on unselected
criteria. It could be argued that physicians' decisions were somehow
influenced by the rate of recovery shown by patients' prior admission
into the Neurology Service. However, we found no baseline differences
in stroke severity or delay to treatment between treated and untreated
patients. Furthermore, the rate of functional recovery was assessed
using multivariate analysis that controlled the
effect of confounders, including the delay to first blood pressure
recording. Our results suggest that the theoretical risks of
blood pressure lowering do not have a clinical correlate in most acute
ischemic stroke patients.37 In addition,
we found that <1% of the studied population worsened in relation to
the use of hypotensive medication. On the contrary, other factors, such
as previous history of hypertension, the formation of brain edema, or
the initial severity of stroke, predicted the rate of recovery.
In summary, these results illustrate that despite current
recommendations for acute stroke management,22
many stroke patients receive hypotensive medications before they are
admitted into neurological centers. Our data also indicate that both
the rate of early stroke recovery and the incidence of brain edema is
associated with an earlier normalization of blood pressure after the
symptoms' onset. Caution is warranted, however, because the study did
not include patients treated with intravenous hypotensive
agents. Therefore, we cannot exclude that an overzealous blood pressure
reduction at an earlier phase after stroke onset might have produced
opposing clinical results. Nevertheless, we believe that the "wait
and see" attitude currently recommended to most acute
ischemic stroke patients with elevated blood pressure deserves
reconsideration in a randomized study. Better knowledge of the effect
of blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke could result in more
effective therapeutic strategies, including a safer use of
thrombolytic and antithrombotic agents.
Received April 28, 1998;
revision received June 5, 1998;
accepted June 26, 1998.
2.
Britton M, Carlsson A, De Faire U. Blood pressure
course in patients with stroke and matched controls. Stroke. 1986;17:861864.
3.
Oppenheimer S, Hachinski V. Stroke Octet:
complications of acute stroke. Lancet. 1992;339:721724.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Jansen PAF, Schulte BPM, Poels EFJ, Gribnau FWJ.
Course of blood pressure after cerebral infarction and transient
ischemic attack. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1987;89:243246.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Carlberg B, Asplund K, Hägg E. Factors
influencing admission blood pressure levels in patients with acute
stroke. Stroke. 1991;22:527530.
6.
Carlberg B, Asplund K, Hägg E. High blood
pressure in acute stroke: is it white coat hypertension? J
Intern Med. 1990;228:291292.
7.
Olsson T, Marklund N, Gustafson Y, Nasman B.
Abnormalities at different levels of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis early after stroke.
Stroke. 1992;23:15731576.
8.
Myers MG, Norris JW, Hachinski VC, Sole MJ. Plasma
norepinephrine in stroke. Stroke. 1981;12:200203.
9.
Jansen PAF, Thien T, Gribnau FWJ, Schulte BPM,
Willemsen JJ, Lamers KJB, Poels EFJ. Blood pressure and both venous and
urinary catecholamines after cerebral infarction.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1988;90:4145.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Harper G, Castleden CM, Potter JF. Factors affecting
changes in blood pressure after acute stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:17261729.[Abstract]
11.
Ito A, Omae T, Katsuki S. Acute changes in blood
pressure following vascular diseases in the brain stem.
Stroke. 1973;4:8084.
12.
Broderick J, Brott T, Barsan W, Haley EC, Levy D,
Marler J, Sheppard G, Blum C. Blood pressure during the first minutes
of focal cerebral ischemia. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:14381443.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Hayashi S, Nehls DG, Kieck CF, Vielma J, DeGirolami U,
Crowell RM. Beneficial effects of induced hypertension on experimental
stroke in awake monkeys. J Neurosurg. 1984;60:151157.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Strandgaard S, Olesen J, Skinjøj E, Lassen NA.
Autoregulation of brain circulation in severe arterial
hypertension. BMJ. 1973;1:507510.
15.
Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS.
Effect of blood pressure and diabetes on stroke in progression.
Lancet. 1994;344:156159.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Yatsu FM, Zivin J. Hypertension in acute
ischemic stroke: not to treat. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:9991000.
17.
Britton M, de Faire U, Helmers C. Hazards of therapy
for excessive hypertension in acute stroke. Acta Med Scand. 1980;207:253257.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Graham DI. Ischemic brain damage of cerebral
perfusion type after treatment of severe hypertension. Br Med
J. 1975;2:739.
19.
Lavin P. Management of hypertension in patients with
acute stroke. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:6668.
20.
Strandgaard S, Paulson OB. Cerebrovascular consequences
of hypertension. Lancet. 1994;344:519521.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Hachinski V. Hypertension in acute stroke. Arch
Neurol. 1985;42:1002.
22.
Adams HP, Brott T, Crowell RM, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR,
Grotta J, Helgason CM, Marler JR, Woolson RF, Zivin JA, Feinberg W,
Mayberg M. Guidelines for the management of patients with acute
ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:19011904.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Astrup J, Siesjo B, Symon L. Thresholds in cerebral
ischemia: the ischemic penumbra. Stroke. 1981;12:723725.
24.
O'Brien MD, Jordan MM, Waltz AG. Ischemic
cerebral edema and the blood-brain barrier. Arch Neurol. 1974;30:461465.
25.
Hatashita S, Hoff J, Ishii S. Focal brain edema
associated with acute arterial hypertension. J
Neurosurg. 1986;64:643649.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Chamorro A, Pujol J, Saiz A, Vila N, Vilanova JC, Alday
M, Blanc R. Periventricular white matter lucencies in
patients with lacunar stroke: a marker of too high or too low blood
pressure? Arch Neurol. 1997;54:12841288.
27.
Mathew NT, Meyer JS, Rivera JM, Charney JZ, Hartman A.
Double-blind evaluation of glycerol therapy in acute cerebral
infarction. Lancet. 1972;2:13271329.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Hantson L, De Keyser J. Neurological scales in the
assessment of cerebral infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis.
1994;4(suppl 2):714.
29.
Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB. The
Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics.
Stroke. 1988;19:547554.
30.
Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Correlation and
regression. In: Basic and Clinical
Biostatistics. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1990:178179.
31.
Caplan L. Intracerebral
hemorrhage revisited. Neurology. 1988;38:624627.
32.
Britton M, Carlsson A. Very high blood pressure in
acute stroke. J Intern Med. 1990;228:611615.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Hatano S. Experience from a multicenter stroke
register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ. 1976;54:541552.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Allen CMC. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: a
prognostic score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:475480.
35.
Wahlgren NG, MacMahon DG, De Keyser J, Indredavik B,
Ryman T, for the INWEST Study Group. Intravenous Nimodipine West
European Stroke Trial (INWEST) of nimodipine in the treatment of acute
ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis.. 1994;4:204210.
36.
Lisk DR, Grotta JC, Lamki LM. Should hypertension be
treated after acute stroke? A randomized controlled trial using single
photon emission computed tomography. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:855862.
37.
Power WJ. Acute hypertension after stroke: the
scientific basis for treatment decisions. Neurology.. 1993;43:461467.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions
Blood Pressure and Functional Recovery in Acute Ischemic Stroke
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Background and PurposeThe relevance of elevated blood
pressure in acute ischemic stroke and its most appropriate
management are unresolved. We aimed to evaluate the rate of functional
recovery with relation to early blood pressure management in patients
with ischemic stroke.
Key Words: cerebrovascular disorders blood pressure stroke therapy
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Atransient elevation of arterial blood
pressure is observed frequently in patients with acute ischemic
stroke1 2 3 4 as the result of mental
stress,5 6 central
mechanisms,7 neuroendocrine
factors,8 9 alcohol intake before
stroke,10 or the topography of the
infarct.11 Frequently, elevated blood pressure
declines spontaneously after stroke without intervening
medications.12 However, it remains unresolved
whether post-stroke hypertension represents a
pathophysiological response to maintain or enhance
perfusion of reversibly damaged cerebrum or is a marker of the severity
of stroke and the risk of further clinical
progression.13 14 15 Based on clinical studies of
the autoregulation of the cerebral blood flow in humans and animals,
and current concepts concerning the pathophysiology of focal brain
ischemia, most authorities discourage the use of
antihypertensive drugs in acute stroke patients because these agents
may reduce the pressure-dependent cerebral blood flow to the
ischemic penumbra and increase cerebral
damage.16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Conversely, it has also been argued
that post-stroke hypertension could be deleterious and facilitate edema
formation in the ischemic tissue.24 25
However, these conflicting opinions have not received adequate testing
in a large series of acute stroke patients. Rather, the available
clinical data are restricted to a few case reports that include
patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic
stroke.8 10 11 12 in a large series of
ischemic stroke patients, we analyzed the rate of
functional recovery in relation to prehospital and in-hospital blood
pressure values. The risk of stroke worsening as the result of early
blood pressure lowering was also addressed.
![]()
Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
From July 1992 to January 1997 we admitted 481 ischemic
stroke patients to the Neurology Service less than 48 hours from
the time of symptom onset. Of those, 235 patients received oral
antihypertensive agents before admission to the Neurology Service,
either during hospital transportation or at the emergency room. At
hospital admission, baseline characteristics of patients, main work-up
findings, in-hospital events, and treatment regimes were collected
prospectively by stroke neurologists as part of the Downtown Barcelona
Stroke Registry.26 In addition, written
records provided by the emergency medical systems and
emergency room (ER) personnel were reviewed retrospectively to assess
prehospital blood pressure values and determine whether
antihypertensive agents had been prescribed. Because physicians
involved in the early care of patients were not part of the stroke
team, antihypertensive agents were prescribed according to the
physicians' particular understanding of poststroke hypertension. These
agents included diuretics (n=42), calcium channel blockers
(n=44), angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitors (n=70), beta-blockers (n=7), or some combination
of the above (n=72). None of the hypotensive agents given to the
patients was investigational; therefore, informed consent was not
required. Neurological impairment was measured at baseline and on day 7
after stroke onset using the Mathew Stroke
Scale27 (normal=100), whose specific value has
been established.28 According to this ordinal
scale, moderate-to-severe stroke at baseline indicated a score
74,
mild stroke indicated a score >74, and worsening stroke indicated a
Mathew scale score at hospital discharge lower than at baseline.
Routine blood tests, chest x-rays,
electrocardiography, and a brain CT scan were
performed on all patients on hospital arrival. Additional
diagnostic tests were performed as appropriate to document
the causes of stroke, which were classified as lacunar (n=67),
cardioembolic (n=190), atherothrombotic (n=71), and undetermined
(n=153), according to the clinical and radiological criteria used by
the Stroke Data Bank.29 Before death or hospital
discharge, a second brain CT scan was performed to outline the
topography and size of the infarct and assess the development of brain
edema, which was defined as the presence of midline shift or
displacement of the ventricles. None of the patients included in the
study received thrombolytic agents,
intravenous antihypertensive therapy, or investigational
drugs. Antiplatelet agents were given to 199 patients, and
fractionated or unfractionated heparin was given to 282. Functional
status was measured on day 7 using the modified Rankin Scale by
investigators blind to the use of oral antihypertensive agents. A score
of 0 to 1 indicated complete recovery, and a score of 2 to 6 indicated
incomplete recovery or death.
The chi-square test, Student t test, and Mann-Whitney
U test were used as appropriate. Bonferroni correction for
multiple comparisons of continuous variables was used if an overall
difference was found. ANCOVA was used to adjust for unbalanced baseline
MAP values when estimating the effect of several factors on drop in
blood pressure. Functional recovery was evaluated using logistic
regression analysis entering into the model variables with
a P value <0.10 on univariate analysis
and forcing into the model the time from baseline to follow-up blood
pressure measurements. The level of significance was set at 0.05.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Characteristics of the Population and Blood Pressure
Course
The main features of the patients studied are described in Table 1
. As expected, patients who received
antihypertensive therapy had a higher prevalence of
arterial hypertension (77% versus 44%;
P<0.0001) and higher blood pressure values than untreated
patients. However, as shown in Table 2
,
the delay to medical attention, and the initial severity of stroke
symptoms, did not differ between treated and untreated patients.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Main Characteristics of the
Population
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Baseline Traits According to Antihypertensive
Medication
Two hundred fifty-two (52%) patients had a Rankin score of 0 to 1
on day 7. In univariate analysis, factors
associated with complete recovery included younger age, lacunar stroke,
baseline Mathew score >74, absence of history of hypertension, lack of
brain edema on CT scan, and higher MAP at baseline. Further, post-hoc
analysis also showed that 20% to 30% drops in MAP on days 2
and 7, respectively, were associated with complete recovery. Using
logistic regression analysis, a Mathew score >74, lack of
hypertension, absence of edema on CT scan, and a 20% to 30% drop in
MAP on day 2 remained associated with complete recovery, as shown in
Table 3
. On the contrary, variables
that did not remain in the model included stroke type and age.
Additionally, when MAP decline on day 2 was replaced in the model by
MAP decline on day 1 or 7, these variables did not remain in the
regression model.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 3. Independent Predictors of Early Complete Recovery
Using Logistic Regression Analysis
The potential association between edema formation, stroke
worsening, and blood pressure changes over time was also tested.
Worsening stroke occurred in 31 of 235 (13.1%) patients treated with
antihypertensive drugs, and in 24 of 246 (9.7%) untreated patients
(nonsignificant differences). Overall, 49 patients (10%) experienced a
drop in MAP >30% from baseline values, including 18 patients who did
not receive hypotensive agents. However, only 4 patients (0.8%)
sustained worsening symptoms in association with a drop in MAP >30%.
At follow-up 110 (23%) patients developed brain edema, and this CT
finding was associated with a smaller MAP decline over time than in
patients without brain edema. On day 2, the drop in blood pressure was
8.6±16.0% in patients with edema, compared with 13.3±15.5%, in
those without edema (P<0.01); on day 7, the figures
observed in both radiological groups were 15.1±15.9% and 19.0±14.8%
(P<0.01), respectively.
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The present study assessed the rate of early complete
neurological recovery in consecutive acute ischemic stroke
patients in which blood pressure was recorded before hospital
arrival, at the ER, and during the first days of hospital admission.
Stroke outcome was measured in consecutive patients evaluating
clinical, radiological, hemodynamic, and therapeutic
variables that included the administration of hypotensive agents
before admission to the Neurology Service. Moreover, because we
controlled the time elapsed from baseline to follow-up blood pressure
measurements, we ruled out an association between stroke outcome and
differential change in MAP due to time differences between outcome
groups. We confirmed the natural tendency of arterial blood
pressure to decrease after stroke onset,2
although the most relevant finding of the study was that patients with
a moderate drop in blood pressure on day 2 after stroke (20% to 30%
from baseline values) almost tripled the odds of full recovery compared
with patients whose blood pressure did not decline. Conversely, stroke
recovery was unrelated to baseline blood pressure values or the course
attained by blood pressure during the first day after stroke. Although
patients who received hypotensive agents had a greater blood pressure
decline than untreated patients, these differences only reached
statistical significance during the second day after stroke. It is
likely that an earlier blood pressure drop was not achieved because the
medication was administered orally. Therefore, we cannot exclude the
possibility that a more rapid blood pressure reduction might have
increased ischemic damage, as suggested by
others.16 17 19 31 Nevertheless, the lower
incidence of brain edema and the better outcome observed in patients
who sustained a moderate drop in blood pressure on day 2 suggested that
these patients benefited from a more propitious cerebral perfusion
pressure at the time that brain edema becomes clinically significant
after ischemic stroke.24 Finally, the
clinical effects of blood pressure lowering did not include a
significant risk of stroke worsening associated with pharmacologically
mediated hypoperfusion.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Wallace JD, Levy LL. Blood pressure after stroke.
JAMA. 1981;246:21772180.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Leira, M. Millan, E. Diez-Tejedor, M. Blanco, J. Serena, B. Fuentes, M. Rodriguez-Yanez, M. Castellanos, A. Lago, A. Davalos, et al. Age Determines the Effects of Blood Pressure Lowering During the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke: The TICA Study Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 769 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ahmed, N. Wahlgren, M. Brainin, J. Castillo, G. A. Ford, M. Kaste, K. R. Lees, D. Toni, and for the SITS Investigators Relationship of Blood Pressure, Antihypertensive Therapy, and Outcome in Ischemic Stroke Treated With Intravenous Thrombolysis: Retrospective Analysis From Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR) Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2442 - 2449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Ritter, P. Kimmeyer, P. U. Heuschmann, R. Dziewas, R. Dittrich, D. G. Nabavi, and E. B. Ringelstein Blood Pressure Threshold Violations in the First 24 Hours After Admission for Acute Stroke: Frequency, Timing, Predictors, and Impact on Clinical Outcome Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 462 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yong and M. Kaste Association of Characteristics of Blood Pressure Profiles and Stroke Outcomes in the ECASS-II Trial Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rodriguez-Yanez, M. Castellanos, M. Blanco, M. M. Garcia, F. Nombela, J. Serena, R. Leira, I. Lizasoain, A. Davalos, and J. Castillo New-onset hypertension and inflammatory response/poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke Neurology, December 12, 2006; 67(11): 1973 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ruttmann, J. Willeit, H. Ulmer, O. Chevtchik, D. Hofer, W. Poewe, G. Laufer, and L. C. Muller Neurological Outcome of Septic Cardioembolic Stroke After Infective Endocarditis Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2094 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Grant, C. Franzini, J. Wild, K. J. Eede, and A. M. Walker Autoregulation of the cerebral circulation during sleep in newborn lambs J. Physiol., May 1, 2005; 564(3): 923 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Mattle, L. Kappeler, M. Arnold, U. Fischer, K. Nedeltchev, L. Remonda, S. M. Jakob, and G. Schroth Blood Pressure and Vessel Recanalization in the First Hours After Ischemic Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 264 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Lindsberg Editorial Comment--High Blood Pressure After Acute Cerebrovascular Occlusion: Risk or Risk Marker? Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 268 - 269. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.K. McGill, L. Gallagher, H.V.O. Carswell, E.A. Irving, A.F. Dominiczak, and I.M. Macrae Impaired Functional Recovery After Stroke in the Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Stroke, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 135 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Boysen Editorial Comment--Persisting Dilemma: To Treat or Not to Treat Blood Pressure in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 526 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Castillo, R. Leira, M. M. Garcia, J. Serena, M. Blanco, and A. Davalos Blood Pressure Decrease During the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke Is Associated With Brain Injury and Poor Stroke Outcome Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 520 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein Blood Pressure Management in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 137 - 141. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Willmot, J. Leonardi-Bee, and P. M.W. Bath High Blood Pressure in Acute Stroke and Subsequent Outcome: A Systematic Review Hypertension, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Semplicini, A. Maresca, G. Boscolo, M. Sartori, R. Rocchi, V. Giantin, P. L. Forte, and A. C. Pessina Hypertension in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Compensatory Mechanism or an Additional Damaging Factor? Arch Intern Med, January 27, 2003; 163(2): 211 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ahmed, P. Nasman, and N. G. Wahlgren Effect of Intravenous Nimodipine on Blood Pressure and Outcome After Acute Stroke Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1250 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Dawson, B. N. Manktelow, T. G. Robinson, R. B. Panerai, and J. F. Potter Which Parameters of Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure and Variability Best Predict Early Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke? Stroke, February 1, 2000; 31(2): 463 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bassetti and M. Aldrich Night time versus daytime transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: a prospective study of 110 patients J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 1999; 67(4): 463 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |