| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1999;30:2119-2125.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Discipline of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Australia.
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr David Dunbabin; Discipline of Medicine, University of Tasmania, 43 Collins St, Hobart, TAS 7000 Australia. E-mail David.Dunbabin{at}med.utas.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsSeventeen healthy subjects and 38 consecutive patients
with a first acute ischemic stroke involving the middle
cerebral artery territory were included. TCD was used to detect
spontaneous recanalization.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to determine the
change in CMCT on days 1 and 14. Improvement of the CMCT at day 14 was
indicated if it decreased in comparison with previous data recorded
at day 1 or when a nonrecordable motor response at day 1 reappeared
at day 14. No CMCT improvement was indicated when there was no
recordable motor response at day 1 and day 14 or the CMCT at day 14
worsened, becoming absent or more delayed. The Pearson
2
test was used to assess the statistical significance of the results in
this study.
ResultsSpontaneous recanalization was observed in 62% of the patients: 24% before 24 hours and 38% after this period. No recanalization was observed in 14 patients. The CMCT improved in 87% of the patients who had recanalized before 24 hours and 62% in the recanalized after 24 hours group (P=0.005). In contrast, CMCT improved in only 17% of the patients in the non-recanalized group
ConclusionsThese data show that spontaneous recanalization results in a better recovery of the central motor pathway leading to a better CMCT improvement in acute ischemic stroke.
Key Words: electrophysiology reperfusion stroke, ischemic stroke outcome
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is possible to detect delays or lack of conduction in descending motor pathways in intact human beings by use of single-pulse high-voltage magnetic stimulation of the cortex and the cervical spine segments. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex painlessly stimulates only the largest motor neuron and the fastest conduction axons.9 Cervical cord stimulation is believed to activate the anterior roots.10 The difference in time between the motor cortex and cervical activation of hand or forearm muscles represents the conduction velocity of the corticalcervical cord motor neurons and is known as the central motor conduction time1 (CMCT).
Magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex, introduced for the first time by Barker,11 may become a routine and useful method in clinical neurophysiology.12 This technique has been widely used to evaluate the integrity of the central motor pathways in patients with motor disturbances in many neurological disorders, including stroke.13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Most of the authors reported that there was some degree of electrophysiological improvement after the onset of stroke. However, none of the studies that have been completed were designed to determine whether there is an association between spontaneous recanalization and the improvement of the CMCT. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of spontaneous recanalization on the improvement of the CMCT in acute ischemic stroke.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assessment of Spontaneous Recanalization
by TCD
In this study TCD measurements were performed using the
Medasonics Transpect TCD device, with a hand-held transducer in a
range-gated, pulsed-wave mode at a frequency of 2 MHZ. A series of TCD
tests was performed on the patients. Blood flow velocities of the MCAs,
anterior cerebral arteries (ACAs), and posterior cerebral arteries
(PCAs) were recorded on both sides through the
transtemporal window that is located just above the
zygomatic bone and the front of the ear.30
Insonation of the MCAs, ACAs, and PCAs
The blood flow signal from the MCA was detected starting with
the posterior portion of the window near the ear and then the probe was
moved slowly anteriorly and superiorly. At the same time the probe was
angled to get the strongest and clearest signal. The depth was set at
55 mm. When the blood flow signal from the MCA with flow direction
toward the probe was detected, it was traced up to 30 or 35 mm.
Doppler shifts were recorded in each 5-mm step. To detect a
blood flow signal from the ACA the depth was set at 65 mm. The
probe angulation was set anteriorly and superiorly. The flow direction
of the ACA was away from the probe. The ACA was traced down to 75 or
80 mm in steps of 5 mm. To detect a blood flow signal from
the PCA, the probe was aimed posteriorly and inferiorly.
The blood flow signal from the PCA usually was detected at 65 mm
and could be traced from a 60- to 70-mm depth, and its flow direction
was toward the probe.
The Doppler shifts with mean blood flow velocity (MV), peak systolic velocity (PSV), and the Gosling Pulsatility Index (PI) were calculated and displayed automatically by the Medasonics Transpect TCD device. Data for MV and PI from each 5-mm step were recorded into a videotape for comparison with further changes of blood flow velocity that occurred in each of the following sections of TCD tests. The relevant color Doppler shifts recorded in each patient were printed out by a Mitsubishi color video copy processor device on a paper-sheet model CK 100S with standard size 110x110 mm.
Criteria for Spontaneous Recanalization
In this study an occlusion at the proximal MCA was indicated
when there was absence of flow signal in TCD while blood flow signal
from the ipsilateral ACA and PCA were detected. When both MCAs could be
insonated, the clinically affected MCA was compared with the unaffected
side as MV%=[MV (affected)/MV (unaffected)]x100%. The asymmetry
index percentage (AI%) between both sides was calculated with the
formula AI%=MV % (MCA affected side)-100%.21 A distal
MCA division occlusion was indicated when there was a diffuse dampening
of blood flow velocity in the affected MCA resulting in an abnormal
asymmetry index of blood flow velocity below -21% with the
contralateral MCA.7 31 During the follow-up period,
spontaneous recanalization was indicated when the
blood flow signal that was previously absent reappeared for a proximal
MCA occlusion or when a previously abnormal asymmetry index of blood
flow velocity came within the normal range for a distal MCA
occlusion.7 Leptomeningeal collateral blood flow supply to
the compromised cerebral territory was indicated when there was an
abnormal increase of blood flow velocity with an asymmetry index of
27% for the ACAs and 28% for the PCAs or in the contralateral
MCA.32 33 34
Assessment of Electrophysiological Recovery
In this study the Magstim Model 200 was used to excite the motor
cortex and spinal motor roots. This device can stimulate the
neuromuscular tissue by inducing small currents in the tissue with a
brief pulse of electromagnetic energy. Due to the limited availability
of the TMS device, the TMS tests could not be performed exactly at day
1 and day 14 as planned. The mean day in which the TMS tests were
performed on the patients after the onset of stroke (day 1) was
1.78±0.98 days for the first test and 12.36±4.05 days for the second
test (day 14). Patients were seated or lying half-supine in bed, with
the arm being studied supported by a pillow. An explanation of
electromagnetic brain stimulation was given to all patients before the
investigation.
Cortical Stimulation
To stimulate the motor cortex, a circular coil (Magstim 9 cm)
was placed in the tangential plane above the vertex. The left
hemisphere was stimulated by a counterclockwise current, with
side A of the coil visible from above and side B facing the vertex,
while the right hemisphere was stimulated by a clockwise current, with
side B of the coil visible from above and side A facing the vertex.
The stimulus intensity was set at 100% power for all patients. To document the presence of a response and to obtain appropriate values of CMCT, facilitation was provided by a gentle voluntary contraction of the thenar muscle being studied. If no voluntary contraction of the thenar muscle could be achieved in the paretic side, the patient was asked to contract the thenar muscle of the normal side.14 An absent response to stimulation was documented if no response was obtained after 4 stimuli with 100% power output of the stimulator and with facilitation from muscle contraction. Patients were stimulated twice from the vertex, and the shortest cortical latency was noted, because this has been shown to provide the basis for the best estimate of the CMCT.14
Cervical Stimulation
To stimulate the cervical motor roots the same coil was closely
applied to the skin over the seventh cervical spine (C7) and centered
in the coronal plane. Counterclockwise current was used to stimulate
roots to the right arm and clockwise current for the left arm. During
stimulation of the spinal roots the muscles were relaxed. As for
stimulation of the cortex, the stimulus intensity used was 100% power,
and responses were recorded in a surface electromyogram of the
thenar muscle. Two responses were recorded, and the longest latency
obtained was noted.
Recording of the Surface Electromyogram
The surface electromyogram was recorded with use of
miniature skin-mounted preamplifiers from the thenar muscle (abductor
pollicis brevis), with electrodes over the thenar eminence in the
direction of the first metacarpal bone. The ground electrode was
attached to the back of the hand being studied. The recording
electrode comprised 2 silver discs 5 mm in diameter set 20 mm
apart. All motor evoked potential (MEP) response signals from the
cortical and cervical stimulation were recorded and displayed
automatically on the screen of the Nicolet Viking IV recording
device. The results of MEP responses recorded on both sides were
later printed out so that hand calculations of the CMCT could be
performed.
Measurement of the CMCT
TMS tests were also performed on both sides on 17 healthy
subjects to measure their CMCT. The same TMS techniques previously
described were also used in the healthy subjects. The CMCT was provided
by subtraction of the longest cervical latency from the shortest
cortical latency. The range of CMCT recorded in active thenar
muscle obtained from the 17 healthy subjects with a mean of
5.5824±1.104 ms was used as normal data to group the CMCT obtained
from the stroke patients included in this study as normal, delayed, and
absent. The CMCT was considered abnormal if it fell outside the 99% CI
limit of these normal CMCT values (mean±2.5 SDs) that ranged from
2.8224 ms to 8.3425 ms. The CMCT was defined as delayed when it fell
above 8.34 ms and as absent when there was no motor response.
In this study, improvement of the CMCT was indicated when there was a
decrease of the CMCT at day 14 in comparison with previous data
recorded at day 1 (CMCT decreased) or when a nonrecordable
motor response at day 1 reappeared at day 14 (CMCT reappeared). On the
other hand, no CMCT improvement was indicated when there was no
recordable motor response at days 1 and 14 (CMCT absent at day 1
and day 14) or the CMCT at day 14 worsened and became absent (CMCT
normal or delayed at day 1 but absent at day 14) or increased (CMCT
increased at day 14). The Pearson
2 test and
the Mantel-Haenszel
2 test were used to assess
the statistical significance of the results in this study.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
TMS tests were performed on both sides at day 1 on 38 stroke
patients and were repeated on 33 of them at day 14. No significant
variation of the CMCT was observed in the normal side; however, on the
affected side the CMCT suffered a dramatic change. The earlier
spontaneous recanalization occurred, the better the
CMCT (Figure 1
). At day 14 the CMCT of
the affected side decreased in 50% of the patients who had recanalized
before 24 hours. In addition, the motor response that was previously
absent at day 1 reappeared in 38% of the patients in this group. For
those who recanalized after 24 hours, the CMCT recorded at day 14
decreased in 62% of the patients. In the nonrecanalized group the CMCT
did not show any change (58%) or even worsened, becoming absent (8%)
or more delayed (16%).
|
TMS tests were performed on 12 of the 14 patients in whom
recanalization did not occur. No improvement of the
CMCT of the affected side was observed in 10 (83%) of them. The CMCT
of the affected side worsened in 3 of these patients at day 14. It
became absent (Figure 1
) in 1 (case 017) and more delayed in the
other 2. In addition, no change was observed in any of the 7 patients
in whom there was no recordable MEP at day 1 in this group.
Pearson
2 tests showed a significantly
better CMCT improvement in the patients in whom spontaneous
recanalization occurred (P=0.005). The
CMCT improved in 87% of the patients in whom spontaneous
recanalization occurred before 24 hours and in 62%
in the group in which it occurred after 24 hours (Figures 2
and 3A
).
In contrast, this electrophysiological
outcome was poor (17%) in the nonrecanalized group (Figures 2
and 3B
). These findings show that spontaneous reperfusion of
cerebral blood flow results in a better CMCT in acute ischemic
stroke.
|
|
The influence of leptomeningeal collateral blood supply on the
improvement of the CMCT is shown in Table 2
. For the group in which no collateral
blood flow was detected, the CMCT at day 14 improved in 64% of the
patients in whom recanalization occurred, whereas
no CMCT improvement was observed in any of the patients from the
nonrecanalized group (2P=0.01). On the other hand, for the
group in which an efficient collateral blood flow supply was detected,
the CMCT improved in both groups, whether or not spontaneous
recanalization occurred, with a better outcome in
the recanalized group (80% versus 40%).
|
Results of the Mantel-Haenszel
2 test
shown in the stratified table (Table 2
) suggest that there is a
significant interaction between spontaneous
recanalization and leptomeningeal collateral
circulation, and both affect the improvement of the CMCT. In addition,
these data confirm that spontaneous recanalization
results in a better electrophysiological
recovery in acute ischemic stroke (Mantel-Haenszel
2=6.76, P=0.009).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many studies have dealt with transcranial motor cortex stimulation in stroke patients.13 18 19 23 27 28 The CMCTs were grouped in these studies as normal, delayed, and absent, and the change in CMCT was assessed according to this classification. According to their reports, no significant change of the CMCT was observed in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. In this study, the change in CMCT was assessed with a self-control trial technique, which compared the CMCTs recorded at day 1 and day 14. This method of assessment showed a significant improvement of the CMCT in the affected side in the reperfused groups at day 14. This electrophysiological improvement may be due to a plastic reorganization in the affected area.
Many animal studies have demonstrated that neurons of the brain
and spinal cord also have the same capacity to regenerate as
peripheral nerves after injury by collateral growth or
sprouting.35 There are relevant evidence from animal
experiments indicating that there is considerable potential for
reorganization of representations and functions in sensory and
motor cortex after occurrence of localized lesions. Three major
mechanisms for this plastic reorganization were suggested: "unmasking
of existing but functionally inactive pathways, sprouting of fibers
from surviving neurons and formation of new synapses, and redundancy of
CNS circuitry allowing alternative pathways to take over
functions."36 These changes in neural plasticity occur
over a period of weeks. More acutely, others have suggested that
previously silent fiber pathways in the brain stem could become
immediately active when the sensory fibers in the spinal cord were
cut.35 A similar process could also occur in the cerebral
cortex. Our data (for example, the case shown in Figure 3A
with
an absent motor response at day 1 that reappeared at day 14) supports
this hypothesis. When worsening of neurological impairment with cell
death occurs due to permanent occlusion of cerebral artery, the
ischemic penumbra around the central necrotic core may be
detected only during the acute phase of stroke (<14 days). A
clear example of this deterioration is the case shown in Figure 3B
, in which the recordable MEP detected at day 1
disappeared completely in the TMS test repeated at day 14.
In this study the CMCT improved in most of the patients in whom spontaneous recanalization occurred. In addition, cortical MEPs that were previously absent reappeared in TMS tests repeated at day 14 after the onset of stroke in many of the patients in the reperfused groups. These data suggest that plastic reorganization occurs in the human brain after the onset of stroke, and cerebral reperfusion influences this process positively, leading to a better recovery of the central motor pathway.
On the other hand, the CMCT worsened in most (80%) of the patients from the nonreperfused group. This poor outcome may be due to an increase of neuronal death in the ischemic penumbra area located around the central necrotic core. It is well known that there is a critical hypoperfusion and neuronal hypoxia37 38 39 ; however, neuronal cells are still viable in this area.40 Reduction of oxygen supply to brain tissue results in a cascade of biochemical reactions in the affected cerebral territory, with a massive calcium influx into the cell and breakdown of the membrane leading to neuronal cell death. If cerebral blood flow is not restored within a short time after the onset of stroke, there may be an extension of neuronal death into the ischemic penumbra, resulting in a clinical and electrophysiological deterioration with a poor stroke outcome.
Another possible mechanism of this electrophysiological deterioration in the nonreperfused group may be an inappropriate activation of apoptosis. Previous studies have shown that certain types of nerve-cell death in the brain occur by an apoptotic mechanism.41 42 43 The authors of these studies have demonstrated that moderate hypoxic-ischemic episodes can cause DNA fragmentation as well as other morphological features of apoptosis in neurons destined to die, whereas more severe hypoxic-ischemic episodes lead to neuronal necrosis and infarction. Therefore, apoptosis may be the mechanism involved in further neuronal death in the ischemic cerebral area around the central necrotic core due to delayed degeneration when cerebral reperfusion does not occur.
In this study, even though there was a better CMCT improvement with a better stroke outcome in the group in which an early efficient collateral blood flow supply was detected, the result did not reach statistical significance when the change in CMCT was analyzed according to the presence of leptomeningeal collateral circulation alone. When both spontaneous recanalization and collateral blood supply were present, the stroke outcome was significantly better than what was observed in the group in which collateral blood supply alone was detected. These data show that leptomeningeal collateral circulation alone is not sufficient to obtain a good clinical and electrophysiological recovery, despite the fact that it contributes to minimize the catastrophic effect of stroke.
The CMCT recorded at day 1 from the normal or nonparetic side in active thenar muscle was delayed in 3 of the stroke patients included in this study. All of them were in the severe stroke severity group. Berardelli and colleagues22 also reported an abnormal delay in CMCT in the unaffected side in 2 of the 20 stroke patients with hemispheric infarction on whom they used transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex to study the change in CMCT in hemiplegia. These data show that ischemic stroke affects the CMCT not only of the compromised cerebral hemisphere but also of the contralateral side.
This delay in CMCT of the nonparetic side in these stroke patients may be due to a compression of the motor pathway from the affected side due to cerebral edema. It is well known that cerebral edema is one of the most important clinical complications in acute ischemic stroke.44 45 46 47 Slivka and coworkers48 examined rats with temporary and permanent occlusion of the right MCA. They found that hemispheric volume, water, and sodium from the infarcted right hemisphere were significantly greater than those from the left hemisphere, beginning 6 hours after MCA occlusion and continuing for 48 hours, with a peak at 24 hours.
This delay in CMCT in the nonparetic side may also be due to a distant neurological disturbance from the compromised cerebral territory called diaschisis.35 Diaschisis was thought to be a temporary block of function or inhibition produced by shock of damage or irritation to brain tissue. When a part is disturbed by injury or disease, that trauma can affect other parts quite far from the site of the original damage.
Another possible cause of the delay in CMCT in the nonparetic side may be associated with an inadequate facilitation of the thenar muscle studied in some of the patients included in this study, who suffered a left stroke with comprehension deficit. Ferbert and his colleagues23 reported different ranges of normal CMCT with TMS tests performed in passive and active thenar muscles. They found a more delayed CMCT in TMS tests performed on healthy subjects with passive thenar muscle, with a higher 99% CI upper limit than data recorded in active thenar muscles.
In conclusion, this study provides evidence for the first time that spontaneous recanalization results in a better recovery of the central motor pathway, which leads to a better CMCT improvement in acute ischemic stroke.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 15, 1999; revision received June 30, 1999; accepted July 20, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Fieschi C, Bozzao L. Transient embolic occlusion
of the MCA cerebral artery and internal carotid arteries in cerebral
apoplexy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1969;32:236240.
3.
Jorgensen HS, Sperling B, Nakayama H, Raaschou
HO, Olsen TS. Spontaneous reperfusion of cerebral infarcts in patients
with acute stroke: incidence, time course, and clinical outcome in the
Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:865873.
4. Kaps M, Teschendorf U, Dorndorf W. Haemodynamic studies in early stroke. J Neurol. 1992;239:138142.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF, Norris JW. Intracranial blood flow velocities in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:13781383.[Abstract]
6. Zanette EM, Roberti C, Pozzilli C, Roberti C, Toni D, Lenzi GL, Fieschi C. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and single photon emission tomography following cerebral infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1993;3:370374.
7.
Zanette EM, Roberti C, Mancini G, Pozzilli C,
Bragoni M, Toni D. Spontaneous middle cerebral artery reperfusion in
acute ischemic stroke: a follow-up study with
transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 1995;26:430433.
8. Zbornikova V. Different flow patterns in infarction of the middle cerebral artery. J Neuroimaging. 1997;7:6977.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Adams RD, Victor M, Ropper AH. Approach to the patients with neurologic diseases. In: Adams RD, Victor M, Ropper AH, eds. Principles of Neurology. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1997:38.
10. Mills KR, Murray NM. Electrical stimulation over the human vertebral column: which neural elements are excited? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;63: 583589.
11. Baker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985;1:11061107.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a useful tool for clinical neurophysiology. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:344345. Editorial.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NMF, Schriefer TN. Magnetic brain stimulation: central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1987;22:744752.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NMF. Response in small
hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J
Physiol (Lond). 1987;388:397419.
15.
Claus D, Harding AE, Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray
NMF, Thomas PK. Central motor conduction in degenerative ataxic
disorders: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry. 1988;51:790795.
16. Mullges W, Ferbert A, Buchner H. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychogenic paralysis. Nervenarzt. 1991;62:349353.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Dominkus M, Grisold W, Jelinek V.
Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials as a
prognostic indicator for motor recovery in stroke patients.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53:745748.
18. Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NEF, French JM, Miller S. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke, I: natural history of central motor conduction. Brain. 1993;116(pt 6):13551370.
19. Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NEF, French JM, Miller S. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke, II: central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain. 1993;116(pt 6):13711385.
20.
Rapisarda G, Bastings E, Denoordhout AM, Pennisi
G, Delwaide PJ. Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by
early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke.. 1996;27:21912196.
21.
Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Manfredi M, Zamponi
A, Cecconi V, Dolce G. Cortical and cervical stimulation after
hemispheric infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:861865.
22. Berardelli A, Inghillari M, Cruccu G, Mercury B, Manfredi M. Electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation in patients with cortical spinal damage due to stroke or motor neuron disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;81:389396.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Ferbert A, Vielhaber S, Meincke U, Buchner H.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation in pontine infarction:
correlation to degree of paresis. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry. 1992;55:294299.
24. Macdonell RAL, Donnan GA, Bladin PF. A comparison of somatosensory evoked and motor evoked potential in stroke. Ann Neurol. 1989;25:6873.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Abbruzzese G, Morena M, Dall'Agata D, Abbruzzese M, Favale E. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in lacunar syndromes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;81:202208.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Rijckevorsel-Harmant K, Boon V. Central magnetic stimulation, somatosensory potentials and clinical evaluation during a rehabilitation treatment in hemiplegic patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;87:102. Abstract.
27. Zgur T, Prevec TS, Golfar N. Correlation of motor evoked potentials to motor deficit during the recovery of ischemic stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;87:102. Abstract.
28. Arac N, Sagduyu A, Binai S, Ertekin C. Prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:21832186.[Abstract]
29.
Cote R, Hachinski VC, Shurvell BL, Norris JW,
Wolfson C. The Canadian Neurological Scale: a preliminary study in
acute stroke. Stroke. 1986;17:731737.
30. Fujioka KA, Douville CM. Anatomy and freehand examination techniques. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:931.
31. Halsey JH, Tan M-J. Evaluation of acute stroke. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R. Transcranial Doppler. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:145151.
32.
Bozzao L, Fantozzi LM, Bastianello S, Bozzao A,
Fieschi C. Early collateral blood supply and late parenchymal brain
damage in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Stroke. 1989;20:735740.
33.
Brass LM, Duterte DL, Morh JP. Anterior cerebral
artery velocity changes in disease of the middle cerebral artery stem.
Stroke. 1989;20:17371740.
34. Vander Eecken HM, Adams RD. The anatomy and functional significance of meningeal arterial anastomoses of the human brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1953;12:132157.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Stein DG, Brailowsky S, Will B. Brain Repair. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
36. Lee RG, van Donkelaar P. Mechanisms underlying functional recovery following stroke. Can J Neurol Sci. 1995;22:257263. Review.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Gunning AJ, Pickering GW, Rob B, Smith AH,
Russell RR. Mural thrombosis of the internal carotid artery and
subsequent embolization. Q J Med. 1964;33:155.
38.
Astrup J, Symon L, Branston NM, Lassen NA.
Cortical evoked potential and extracellular K+
and H+ at critical levels of brain
ischemia. Stroke. 1977;8:5157.
39. Olsen TS, Larsen B, Herning M, Skriver EB, Lassen NA. Blood flow and vascular reactivity in collaterally perfused brain tissue: evidence of an ischaemic penumbra in patients with acute ischemic stroke. 1983;14:332341.
40. Huber M, Heiss WD. Acute ischemic stroke. Sem Thromb Hemost.. 1996;22:5360.
41. Dragunow M, Preston K. The role of inducible transcription factors in apoptotic nerve cell death. Brain Res Rev. 1995;21:128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Hughes PE, Alexi T, Walton M, Williams CE, Dragunow M, Clark RG, Gluckman PD. Activity and injury-dependent expression of inducible transcription factors, growth factors and apoptosis-related genes within the central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 1999;57:42150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Dragunow M, Preston K. The role of inducible transcription factors in apoptotic nerve cell death. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1995;21:128.
44. Klatzo I. Neuropathological aspects of brain edema. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1967;26:114. Presidential address.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Ito U, Go KG, Walker JT Jr, Spatz M, Klatzo I. Experimental cerebral ischemia in Mongolian gerbils, III: behaviour of blood brain barrier. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1976;34:16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Ito U, Ohno K, Tomita, et al. Cerebral changes during recirculation following temporary ischemia in Mongolian gerbils. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1976;16(pt 2):313322.
47.
Ito U, Ohno K, Nakamura R, Suganuma F, Yanaba Y.
Brain edema during ischemia and after restoration of blood
flow: measurement of water, sodium, potassium content and plasma
protein permeability. Stroke. 1979;10:542547.
48.
Slivka A, Murphy E, Horrocks L. Cerebral edema
after temporary and permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the
rat. Stroke. 1995;26:10611065.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Yang, M. D. Hill, W. F. Morrish, M. E. Hudon, P. A. Barber, A. M. Demchuk, R. J. Sevick, and R. Frayne Comparison of Pre- and Postcontrast 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for the Evaluation of Distal Intracranial Branch Occlusions in Acute Ischemic Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2002; 23(4): 557 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S J BONIFACE Plasticity after acute ischaemic stroke studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2001; 71(6): 713 - 715. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina, J. Montaner, S. Abilleira, J. F. Arenillas, M. Ribo, R. Huertas, F. Romero, and J. Alvarez-Sabin Time Course of Tissue Plasminogen Activator-Induced Recanalization in Acute Cardioembolic Stroke: A Case-Control Study Stroke, December 1, 2001; 32(12): 2821 - 2827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina, J. Montaner, S. Abilleira, B. Ibarra, F. Romero, J. F. Arenillas, and J. Alvarez-Sabin Timing of Spontaneous Recanalization and Risk of Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Cardioembolic Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2001; 32(5): 1079 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Wu, W. J. Koroshetz, L. Ostergaard, F. S. Buonanno, W. A. Copen, R. G. Gonzalez, G. Rordorf, B. R. Rosen, L. H. Schwamm, R. M. Weisskoff, et al. Predicting Tissue Outcome in Acute Human Cerebral Ischemia Using Combined Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging Stroke, April 1, 2001; 32(4): 933 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |