| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1999;30:2167-2173.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital (R.R.) and Institute of Psychiatry (R.R., R.H.), and Department of Health Care of the Elderly, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, Dulwich Hospital (S.J.), London, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Rahul Rao, Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Job Ward, Thomas Guy House, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK. E-mail rrao{at}globalnet.co.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsA battery of neuropsychological tests was administered to 4 groups of community residents older than 65 years. The groups comprised 25 patients with carotid stenosis and TIA, 25 nonamputees with PVD, 25 patients with stroke, and 25 matched (with the stroke group) controls.
ResultsStroke patients showed greater impairment than controls in all tests. PVD patients did not perform significantly worse (P<0.05 after Bonferroni correction) than control subjects on any of the neuropsychological tests. However, 25% of PVD patients had scores lying within the bottom 5% of control group scores for attention, calculation, and 1 test of frontal lobe function. TIA patients were more impaired in general intellectual impairment and frontal lobe function than controls. Frontal lobe impairment, suicidal thinking, and age were all independent predictors of global cognitive impairment in the TIA group. Frontal lobe impairment was the only predictor of global cognitive impairment in the PVD group.
ConclusionsTIA and PVD patients showed similar patterns of neuropsychological impairment, but TIA may result in more prolonged cognitive impairment, particularly in frontal lobe function. This group may be at increased risk of vascular dementia as well as impulsivity and suicide.
Key Words: cerebral ischemia, transient cognition frontal lobe neuropsychological tests peripheral vascular disease suicide
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The group most widely studied in exploring the effects of acute or transient ischemia on cognitive function is preoperative patients with carotid stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Early descriptions of "organic impairment" associated with angiographically demonstrable carotid stenosis failed to provide data on areas of cognitive dysfunction.6 7 However, these studies are made less valid by the inclusion of stroke patients in their control groups,8 9 10 11 lack of standardization in defining severity of carotid stenosis, and lack of adequate matching of control groups.12 13 14
Measures of impairment in verbal and performance IQ have shown conflicting results in these studies. However, frontal lobe dysfunction in patients with carotid stenosis has been a more consistent finding.8 12 14 15
Relatively little is known about cognitive impairment associated with
peripheral vascular disease (PVD), but PVD is known to be a
risk factor for TIA.16 A study assessing 373 consecutive
patients with clinically demonstrated and Doppler-proven PVD found
that 72 of the 144 patients who had not experienced a TIA or stroke
were found to have between 60% and 99% carotid
stenosis.17 Another study screened 78 patients
with PVD who had not experienced a previous stroke or TIA and in whom a
carotid bruit was not elicited clinically. This study found that 33%
of patients had carotid stenosis of 16% to 50%, 14% had
stenosis of >50%, and in 5% the stenosis was
75%.
All patients with the highest degree of stenosis were older
than 68 years. Both studies highlight the possibility of accompanying
cerebrovascular disease in neurologically asymptomatic
older patients with PVD.18
There is clearly a need for further studies using more refined inclusion criteria and standardized neuropsychological batteries in selected groups of symptomatic patients with a defined degree of carotid stenosis, together with carefully chosen control groups. Although previous studies have explored cognitive impairment in the presence of PVD,19 20 there have been no studies published to date that have made comparisons between groups of patients with stroke, TIA, PVD, and a control group. This would allow a comparison of "grades" of vascular disease in carefully selected groups.
This study examined the hypothesis that the prevalence of general intellectual and frontal lobe impairment in patients older than 65 years with stroke, transient cerebrovascular ischemia, and PVD would be significantly higher than in a control group matched (with the stroke group) for age and sex.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
Stroke Group (Group 1)
The stroke group consisted of 25 consecutive patients with
anterior circulation stroke confirmed by clinical examination and
structural brain imaging. Twelve patients had right (4 male), 10 left
(3 male), and 3 bilateral (2 male) infarcts in the carotid
distribution. The study was confined to patients who had been admitted
to the hospital with stroke between 6 months and 1 year before
interview, followed by a period of inpatient rehabilitation. This time
interval was chosen because it was thought that most patients who had
survived their stroke would have been discharged from the hospital by 6
months after their stroke and would also have had the benefit of a
period of rehabilitation. The upper limit of 1 year was chosen to
minimize the attrition from the study through death and further
stroke(s).
Patients were selected if they were still residing in the hospital catchment area and were aged 65 years or older at the time of their first anterior circulation stroke. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) an additional stroke; (2) history of PVD; (3) history of drug or alcohol misuse; (3) history of Parkinson's disease, head injury, or epilepsy; and (4) carcinomatosis or uncontrolled metabolic, endocrine, or respiratory disorders.
TIA Group (Group 2)
The TIA groups consisted of 25 consecutive patients aged 65
years or older who were on the waiting list for carotid
endarterectomy. All patients had experienced at
least 1 TIA and showed a stenosis of >70% on Doppler
ultrasonography of 1 or both internal carotid arteries. Twelve patients
had right-sided (5 male), 10 left-sided (8 male), and 3 bilateral (2
male) stenosis.
Patients with a history of stroke or clinical evidence of stroke during preoperative screening were excluded; other exclusion criteria were the same as those of the stroke group.
PVD Group (Group 3)
The PVD group consisted of 25 consecutive patients aged 65 years
or older on the waiting list for femoropopliteal bypass. Patients with
a history of stroke or TIA were excluded, as were amputees. Other
exclusion criteria were the same as those of the stroke group.
Control Group (Group 4)
The control group consisted of 25 patients aged 65 years or
older who had undergone elective total hip or knee replacement
for osteoarthritis, followed by inpatient rehabilitation. All
operations had been performed between 6 and 11 months before interview.
Exclusion criteria were a history of stroke, TIA, or PVD. Other
exclusion criteria were the same as those of the stroke group.
Procedures
Patients' general practitioners were contacted
before patients were interviewed. In each case, documentation was made
of patients whose general practitioners refused that the
patient be interviewed and those patients considered by their general
practitioners to be too frail, cognitively impaired, or
uncommunicative. Patients who had died or moved out of the hospital
catchment area since the study began were also excluded.
For all groups, written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All participants were interviewed outside the hospital by 1 interviewer (R.R.).
A battery of 12 neuropsychological tests was administered to each
patient. This comprised 9 tests from CAMCOG, a detailed cognitive
examination drawn from Cambridge Mental Disorders of the Elderly
Examination (CAMDEX).21 CAMCOG assesses the following
cognitive domains: (1) abstract thinking, (2) attention, (3)
calculation, (4) language, (5) memory, (6) orientation, (7) praxis, (8)
perception (recognition), and (9) Mini-Mental State Examination
(MMSE).22 A cutoff value of
69 on CAMCOG has been found
to discriminate well between demented and nondemented community
residents.23
Other tests, which examined frontal lobe function, included the following: (10) Trail-Making Test, (11) Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale (BDCS), and (12) Controlled Word Association Test. The Trail-Making Test is an observer-rated test of psychomotor speed, with high specificity and sensitivity in the detection of organic brain damage, particularly prefrontal dysfunction.24 The BDCS is a measure of the degree of independent regulation of behavior in elderly people.25 It is known to be associated with both impulsivity and caregiver ratings of disinhibition and draws on aspects of frontal lobe functioning. The BDCS includes 7 novel or repetitive motor tasks and 1 verbal task. The Controlled Word Association Test requires the respondent to generate as many words as possible (excluding names and proper nouns) beginning with the letters F, A, and S. In each case, the number of words generated within 1 minute is assessed.26
Other measures included general sociodemographic data, blood pressure, and therapeutic drug intake. Histories of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, and arrhythmia were also recorded from medical notes and information from the general practitioner. Chronic physical illness was assessed from a scale adapted from the Gospel Oak Study,27 constituting 11 chronic physical disorders commonly associated with later life. Patients were also classified according to diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences (SPSS/PC+ 4.0).28 The
2 statistic was applied to categorical data,
with Yates correction applied appropriately. One-way ANOVA was
performed to compare scale scores between groups. Further associations
in TIA and PVD groups were examined with the Spearman correlation
coefficient.
Hierarchical multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine predictors of CAMCOG score in TIA and PVD groups. Categorical variables with >1 df were recategorized into binary variables, and scale scores were also recategorized according to whether they fell below or at/above the median value for that group.
For each group, variables with a 2-tailed P value of
0.2 correlated with CAMCOG were then entered into the logistic
regression equation by the stepwise method, with CAMCOG as the
dependent variable. Those variables showing stronger
associations with CAMCOG scores were entered into the equation before
variables showing less significant associations.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2=4.2, df=3, P=0.24) or
sex (1-way ANOVA corrected
2=2.5,
df=3, P=0.5) between groups for patients excluded
from the study. A comparison of sociodemographic and cognitive
variables across groups is shown in Table 1
|
Comparison of neuropsychological variables by 1-way ANOVA with post
hoc Bonferroni and Tukey honestly significant difference
corrections is displayed in Table 2
.
Stroke patients displayed poorer performance than controls on
abstract thinking (P=0.001), attention
(P=0.001), calculation (P=0.0007),
language (P=0.001), memory (P=0.002), orientation
(P=0.005), perception (P=0.03), praxis
(P=0.001), and MMSE (P=0.00001). The
stroke group showed poorer verbal fluency for categories A and S (F,
P=0.1; A, P=0.005; S, P=0.005) than
controls, took significantly longer to complete Trail-Making A
(P=0.01) and B (P=0.01) tests, and showed greater
impairment on the BDCS (P=0.0003). TIA patients showed
greater impairment on the BDCS (P=0.002) and MMSE
(P=0.003). PVD patients did not differ from the control
group in any of the aforementioned neuropsychological
variables.
|
To examine the pattern of cognitive impairment across groups, the
Z value for each cognitive variable in the control group
(SD=1, Z=0) was used as baseline against which to compare
distributions of neuropsychological variables in other groups.
Differences between Z values were then calculated for each
stroke, TIA, and PVD patient (ie, scale score-mean control total scale
score/SD of control scale score), and a mean Z value was found for each
domain of neuropsychological function. Distribution of Z
values is shown in Figure 1
.
|
Since group means may hide the distribution of scale scores within a
group, the number of patients in each group whose score on a
neuropsychological variable fell within the bottom 5% of scale
scores was determined (Figure 2
). It is
striking that 40% of TIA patients showed scores on tests of attention,
calculation, and frontal lobe function (BDCS) lying in the bottom 5%
of control scores. A similar finding was observed for 25% of PVD
patients for the same scales.
|
The PVD group differed significantly from the stroke group on all tests except aspects of frontal lobe function (verbal fluency F and BDCS) and memory; the TIA group only differed from the stroke group on the Trail-Making Test and verbal fluency S.
Hierarchical Linear Regression Analysis for TIA and
PVD Groups
To examine predictors of cognitive impairment in the TIA and PVD
groups, correlation matrices were set up for each group, in which a
number of sociodemographic, physical, and neuropsychological
variables were correlated with CAMCOG score with the Spearman
correlation coefficient (Table 3
).
Coefficients with a 2-tailed significance of <0.2 were then entered
into a linear regression equation with the use of the stepwise method.
Those variables showing stronger associations with CAMCOG scores
were entered into the equation before variables showing less
significant associations. The significance of each independent
variable in its relationship with the dependent variable was
tested by assessing the change in adjusted
R2 at each step, with no more
variables removed when the P value of the F statistic
(ratio of predicted mean square to difference between observed and
predicted mean square) after we entered the new variable was
>0.1.
|
In the TIA group, verbal fluency F (F=13.8, P=0.001), suicidal thinking (F=13.0, P=0.005), and BDCS (F=12.1, P=0.03) were the only predictors of CAMCOG score. Verbal fluency F and suicidal thinking accounted for 52% of the variance in CAMCOG score. In the PVD group, verbal fluency F (F=24.1, P=0.0001) and Trail-Making B time (F=18.4, P=0.02) accounted for 59% of the variance in CAMCOG score. The presence of cardiovascular disease or diabetes did not predict cognitive impairment in either group.
In view of the significant differences in mean MMSE and BDCS scores
between TIA and control groups, scores on these scales were
reclassified according to whether values fell below or at/above the
median score. A
2 test (with Yates correction)
was then performed against people experiencing TIAs for
5 years/<5
years. There was no relationship with number of TIA years for the MMSE
(corrected
2=0.0, df=1,
P=1.0), but TIA patients scoring <15 on the BCDS were more
likely to have experienced TIAs for
5 years (corrected
2=4.1, df=1,
P=0.04).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carotid Stenosis and Cognitive Impairment
Few studies have compared cognitive function between patients with
stroke and those with TIAs and/or carotid stenosis. Only 1
study compared patients with anterior circulation stroke, patients with
TIAs, and a healthy (nonvascular) control group in terms of general
intellectual function. In this study, Sinatra et al29
found no differences between stroke and TIA groups for verbal memory.
Mononen et al30 assessed TIA patients before carotid
endarterectomy. No differences were observed
between stroke and TIA patients in tests of verbal fluency (for words
beginning with A and S), attention, verbal
memory, and visual memory. Another study by De Renzi and
Faglioni31 showed that patients with both TIAs and
stroke performed more poorly in terms of reaction time (psychomotor
speed) than a control group, with the TIA group performing marginally
worse than the stroke group.
Stroke patients did not show greater impairment than TIA patients in any of the neuropsychological components of CAMCOG in the present study. Moreover, stroke and TIA patients were significantly more impaired than controls on global cognitive impairment (MMSE) and on BDCS.
Only 3 previous studies have compared TIA patients with no history of stroke and a matched nonvascular control group.15 32 33 Benke et al32 studied abstract thought, verbal fluency, block design, and verbal memory in asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy patients and nonmatched controls. TIA patients were more impaired in all tests except verbal memory. Iddon et al33 compared symptomatic carotid endarterectomy patients with controls matched for verbal IQ and age. Tests included set shifting, visual memory, verbal memory, verbal fluency, and the MMSE. No differences were found between carotid endarterectomy and control patients on any of the aforementioned tests. In the third study, King et al15 assessed symptomatic patients and with age- and sex-matched control subjects. Patients were compared on subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale measuring verbal IQ (information, similarities, comprehension) and performance IQ (block design and object assembly), as well on Trail-Making A and B tests. No differences were observed between groups for verbal IQ, but carotid endarterectomy patients showed greater impairment in performance IQ and Trail Making Test time. As a whole, the above studies of carotid endarterectomy patients show conflicting results. However, frontal lobe dysfunction accompanying carotid stenosis was demonstrable in 2 of these studies.
In the present study, 2 measures of frontal lobe function (verbal fluency F and BDCS score) were independent predictors of global cognitive impairment in TIA patients. Forty percent of TIA patients also had deficits in attention and BDCS scores within the bottom 5% of scores for control patients. This may be relevant because impairment in executive function and some aspects of attention are associated with frontal-subcortical brain dysfunction. Divided attention is sensitive to frontal lobe damage.34 The BDCS encompasses most aspects of executive function such as goal formation, planning, execution of plans, and monitoring of performance
The present study did not have the benefit of brain imaging to assess the contribution of neurologically silent cerebrovascular disease to impairment in frontal lobe function in TIA patients. Lacunar infarcts are commonly associated with disruption of frontal connections to the basal ganglia and anterior limb/genu of the internal capsule, which may result in impaired frontal lobe function.35 A similar clinical presentation is observed with periventricular36 and deep37 38 white matter lesions. It is possible that severe carotid stenosis may result in ischemic changes that give rise to both pathologies.39
Indeed, silent microembolism has been noted with carotid stenosis of >70%.40 Silent lacunar infarction affecting subcortical systems is also a recognized consequence of carotid stenosis.41 One study of 75 patients with angiographically demonstrable carotid stenosis found that all 5 patients suffering TIA had at least 1 clinically silent hypodense lesion resembling lacunar infarction.42 Finally, carotid stenosis is known to have a strong association with white matter lesions in older people.43
The finding of suicidal thinking as a predictor of cognitive impairment in TIA patients may be related to behavioral sequelae of frontal lobe dysfunction rather than mood disorder per se, since depressive disorder was not associated with CAMCOG score. This is further supported by the poor performance of TIA patients on the BDCS, which has been validated against measures of impulsivity. It is known that people with cerebrovascular disease are at increased risk of suicide.44 A possible cerebrovascular substrate has previously been suggested after the finding of an association with mixed vascular/Alzheimer-type dementia rather than Alzheimer's disease.45
PVD and Cognitive Impairment
There remains some awareness that cerebrovascular pathology
may accompany PVD. Phillips et al19 assessed memory,
language, praxis, visuospatial skills, and abstract reasoning in lower
limb amputees and in age- and education-matched community volunteers.
PVD patients showed greater impairment than controls on tests of
psychomotor speed and abstract reasoning.
In a later study, Phillips and Mate-Cole20 compared patients with PVD with age- and education-matched stroke patients and controls. Tests of verbal fluency, abstract thought, verbal and visual memory, attention, psychomotor speed, language, and visuospatial skills were used. PVD patients showed greater impairment than controls on visual memory, Trail-Making B test, and visuospatial skills. Although the PVD group as a whole did not differ significantly from the control group in any neuropsychological domain in the present study, at least 20% of PVD patients fell within the bottom 5% of control group scores in the areas of attention, memory, and BDCS score. This should be considered along with the finding that only aspects of frontal lobe function (verbal fluency F and Trail-Making B time) were independent predictors of cognitive impairment in the PVD group.
Conclusions
The finding of impairment across multiple cognitive domains in
older people after their first stroke is not a novel finding.
Information regarding the localization of infarcts in stroke patients
is reported elsewhere (R. Rao, MRCPsych, et al, unpublished data,
1999). However, areas of focal neuropsychological deficit in
patients with TIA accompanying carotid stenosis and in PVD
patients suggest a role for silent cerebrovascular ischemia in
the pathogenesis of intellectual impairment. This model is particularly
attractive for TIA patients, who demonstrated both global impairment on
a screen of cognitive function (MMSE) and impairment confined to
frontal lobe dysfunction (BDCS). The general pattern of
neuropsychological impairment appears similar in patients with TIA and
in those with PVD, suggesting some similarity in etiopathological
mechanisms.
A gradation in scale scores across grades of vascular risk is also noticeable for most neuropsychological variables. Unfortunately, information was not available concerning the state of the carotid arteries in PVD patients; this would have provided valuable information, particularly in those patients whose psychometric profiles resembled those of the TIA group.
Despite the age group involved, the present study did not exclude patients with Alzheimer's disease, which may have influenced neuropsychological performance. This is particularly relevant in patients with vascular risk factors for 2 main reasons. First, there is growing awareness that vascular risk factors are common to both Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia.46 This may have led to some degree of contamination of groups with vascular pathology. Second, it is known that the superimposition of stroke on subclinical Alzheimer's disease may accelerate the onset of dementia by reducing cognitive reserve.47 It is also possible that, given the increased sensitivity in the detection of mild frontal lobe dysfunction by some neuropsychological tests, the presence of such impairment may have been attributable to frontotemporal dementia rather than cognitive impairment of vascular origin. Although the MMSE is strongly biased toward language impairment, none of the patients in this study were aphasic or lacked sufficient comprehension of English to make the interpretation of performance on the MMSE invalid.
Since all patients in the stroke group had undergone a period of rehabilitation, this may have biased the selection process toward a sample with comparatively less neuropsychological impairment than would have been the case had rehabilitation not been implemented. This may downplay the cognitive sequelae of vascular damage.
The small numbers in this study suggest that the findings should be interpreted with some degree of caution. It is also possible that the relatively higher systolic blood pressure in all vascular groups may have influenced cognitive function, since hypertension has a recognized association with certain areas of cognitive impairment, such as attention deficit.48
Patients with TIA represent a sizable group in terms of morbidity. One community study found this group to form a higher percentage of the population than those with dementia and Parkinson's disease combined.49 In addition to patients with carotid stenosis, other TIA subgroups may also be at risk, with a more recent study suggesting that TIAs in the presence of atrial fibrillation are also associated with cognitive dysfunction.50 Future studies would benefit from employing larger numbers of TIA and PVD patients, together with closer inspection of frontal lobe dysfunction by complementing neuropsychological testing with behavioral assessment and structural/functional brain imaging. The findings from the present study suggest that patients with TIAs are at greater risk of cognitive impairment and may therefore benefit from brief cognitive screening in both primary and secondary care settings.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 16, 1999; revision received July 7, 1999; accepted July 7, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Laurin, K. H. Masaki, L. R. White, and L. J. Launer Ankle-to-Brachial Index and Dementia: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study Circulation, November 13, 2007; 116(20): 2269 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Mangiafico, F. Sarnataro, M. Mangiafico, and C. E. Fiore Impaired cognitive performance in asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease: relation to C-reactive protein and D-dimer levels Age Ageing, January 1, 2006; 35(1): 60 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Burton, R. A. Kenny, J. O'Brien, S. Stephens, M. Bradbury, E. Rowan, R. Kalaria, M. Firbank, K. Wesnes, and C. Ballard White Matter Hyperintensities Are Associated With Impairment of Memory, Attention, and Global Cognitive Performance in Older Stroke Patients Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1270 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ballard, E. Rowan, S. Stephens, R. Kalaria, and R. A. Kenny Prospective Follow-Up Study Between 3 and 15 Months After Stroke: Improvements and Decline in Cognitive Function Among Dementia-Free Stroke Survivors >75 Years of Age Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2440 - 2444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Waldstein, C. F. Tankard, K. J. Maier, J. R. Pelletier, J. Snow, A. W. Gardner, R. Macko, and L. I. Katzel Peripheral Arterial Disease and Cognitive Function Psychosom Med, September 1, 2003; 65(5): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. K. Srikanth, A. G. Thrift, M. M. Saling, J. F.I. Anderson, H. M. Dewey, R. A.L. Macdonell, and G. A. Donnan Increased Risk of Cognitive Impairment 3 Months After Mild to Moderate First-Ever Stroke: A Community-Based Prospective Study of Nonaphasic English-Speaking Survivors Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1136 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. McDowd, D. L. Filion, P. S. Pohl, L. G. Richards, and W. Stiers Attentional Abilities and Functional Outcomes Following Stroke J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., January 1, 2003; 58(1): P45 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J K Lovett and P M Rothwell Suicide in a patient with symptomatic carotid occlusion J R Soc Med, January 2, 2002; 95(2): 93 - 94. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |