(Stroke. 1999;30:2360-2365.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurological Surgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
Correspondence to Toshihiro Ueda, MD, PhD, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Shigenobu-cho, Onsen-gun, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan. E-mail tueda{at}m.ehime-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsSeventy-six patients received intra-arterial thrombolysis within 6 hours of symptom onset. The multiple regression method was used to analyze associations between the modified Rankin scale (MRS) at 6 months after treatment and clinical factors including age, infarction type, duration of ischemia, dose of urokinase, degree of recanalization, hemorrhage, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSSS), and residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment single-photon emission-computed tomography; these values were assessed with the use of the regional-to-cerebellar activity (R/CE) ratio of ischemic region to cerebellum and asymmetry index.
ResultsMRS at 6 months was good (0 to 3) in 65% and poor (4 to 6) in 35%. Factors significantly related to MRS at 6 months were R/CE ratio (P<0.0001), NIHSSS at baseline and the following day (P<0.0001), cardioembolic infarction (P=0.0014), age (P=0.0074), and recanalization grade (P=0.007). NIHSSS of >20, R/CE ratio of <0.35, cardioembolic infarction, incomplete recanalization (grade <3), and older age (>75 years) were determined to be significant independent predictors of poor outcome.
ConclusionsThe residual CBF, neurological score at baseline and the following day, age, and recanalization grade correlated significantly with long-term outcome. The NIHSSS of >20 and R/CE ratio of <0.35 were determined to be significant independent predictors of poor outcome by multivariable analysis.
Key Words: cerebral blood flow outcome stroke, ischemic thrombolytic therapy tomography, emission computed
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although a number of studies without control groups have supported the possibility that intra-arterial thrombolysis might achieve faster, more complete recanalization with less fibrinolytic agent and smaller risk of hemorrhage by direct administration at the site of thrombus,10 11 12 13 14 its efficacy remains to be determined. Recently, the Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT) trial,15 which was the first randomized, double-blind trial of intra-arterial thrombolysis within 6 hours from symptom onset, demonstrated that recanalization was enhanced with pro-urokinase (rpro-UK). However, no prospective studies have assessed the clinical or radiologic predictive variables related to long-term outcome in patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. Particularly, no analysis of the relation between pretreatment cerebral perfusion status and long-term outcome has been reported in prospective studies of either intra-arterial thrombolysis or intravenous thrombolysis. A retrospective study may still be useful to address these issues until a randomized double-blind trial of intra-arterial thrombolysis can be completed and its data made available.
The purpose of this study was to assess predictive factors, including age, infarction type, duration of ischemia, dose of an agent, degree of recanalization, hemorrhage, pretreatment and posttreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSSS),16 and residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment SPECT, related to long-term outcome with the use of multivariable statistical analysis in both cardioembolic and atherosclerotic infarction patients with intra-arterial thrombolysis.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our inclusion criteria for intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy were as follows: (1) no apparent hypodensity areas were observed on the admission CT scan, (2) the patient could be treated within 6 hours, in principle, of symptom onset, and (3) occluded arteries suggested by symptoms were demonstrated by cerebral angiography. Six patients who were treated 6 to 7.5 hours after symptom onset were included in this study because they had a good CBF value by pretreatment SPECT. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their relatives. The exclusion criteria were (1) recent hemorrhagic stroke, (2) critical systemic condition, (3) serious disabling disease, and (4) classic contraindications to thrombolytic therapy (recent surgical operation, known bleeding tendency, etc). This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.
The patient's neurological status was evaluated on admission, the following day, and 1 week and 1 month after treatment according to NIHSSS, which expresses the severity of neurological status numerically from 0 (normal) to 42. Clinical outcome at 6 months after treatment was assessed according to the modified Rankin scale (MRS)18 : grades 0 to 5 and 6 (death). Factors related to clinical outcome were investigated in all patients, cardioembolic infarction group, and atherosclerotic infarction group. Patients were classified by the MRS into 2 groups: good outcome (MRS 0 to 3) and poor outcome (MRS 4 to 6). First, the multivariable analysis performed with the multiple regression method investigated the association between the MRS at 6 months and clinical factors including age, infarction type, duration of ischemia, dose of urokinase, degree of recanalization, hemorrhage, pretreatment and posttreatment (the following day) NIHSSS, and residual CBF evaluated by SPECT in all patients and cardioembolic infarction group. The MRS at 6 months was analyzed as the dependent variable, whereas the other clinical factors were analyzed as independent variables. There was no analysis of the atherosclerotic infarction group because there were not enough patients for multivariable assessment. Second, significant predictive values of variables of the poor outcome group compared with those of the good outcome group were identified.
CT was performed on all patients immediately after admission. When no clear hypodensity area was noted at the sites suggested by the clinical symptoms, SPECT was performed with the use of 99mTc-labeled hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) and a 4-head gamma camera (SPECT 2000H-40, Hitachi) with a low-energy, high-resolution collimator. Details of our method of analyzing SPECT data were described in previous reports.8 9 In short, of 16 axial sections, the section most clearly showing the ischemic region was selected, and regions of interest (ROIs) were set within the ischemic region (a), the corresponding region on the contralateral side (b), and the entire cerebellar hemisphere on the ischemic side (c), and the mean count was determined in each region. Linear adjustment19 was made by assuming the blood flow in the normal cerebellar hemisphere to be 55 mL/100 g per minute.20 The CBF was assessed semiquantitatively by calculating 2 parameters: (1) the ischemic regional-to-cerebellar activity (R/CE) ratio (R/CE ratio=a/c) and (2) the asymmetry index (AI=1+[b-a]/[a+b]). The ROIs were hand-drawn in apparent whole ischemic areas based on qualitative inspection of the rCBF maps. The contralateral, mirror-image ROI was drawn automatically.
Digital subtraction angiography was performed with the use of a 5F
catheter through a femoral artery. Patients were given an
intravenous injection of heparin (5000 U) before
angiography. The tip of a FasTracker-18 (Target Therapeutics) was
advanced into the thrombus or upstream from the occlusion side over a
0.014-inch Taper Dasher guide wire (Target Therapeutics). Urokinase
(240 000 U) was dissolved in 20 mL of
physiological saline and injected manually for
10 minutes. The maximum dose of urokinase was 960 000 U. Comparing
the preinfusion and postinfusion angiograms, restoration of
arterial patency was classified into 5 categories by use of
the method described by Mori et al21 : grade 0, unchanged;
grade 1, movement of thrombus not associated with any improvement in
perfusion; grade 2, partial recanalization with
reperfusion in <50% of the ischemia-related area; grade 3,
partial recanalization with reperfusion in >50%
of the ischemia-related area; and grade 4, complete or
near-complete recanalization with full return of
perfusion. CT was also obtained immediately, the next day, 1 or 2
weeks, and 1 month after treatment.
For statistical analysis, the values were expressed as mean±SD, and differences among 2 or more groups were examined by ANOVA. Multiple regression analyses with and without backward stepwise method were performed to assess the correlation of MRS (dependent variable) with other clinical factors (independent variables). Logic regression analysis was applied to identify the significant predictive values of variables of the poor outcome group compared with the good outcome group. GB-STAT software (Dynamic Microsystems Inc) was used for computerized statistical analyses.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Multivariable Outcome Studies
Factors significantly related to the MRS at 6 months were as
follows: R/CE ratio (P<0.0001), NIHSSS at baseline
(P<0.0001), NIHSSS on the following day
(P<0.0001), cardioembolic infarction (P=0.0014),
age (P=0.0074), and recanalization grade
(P=0.007) in the overall patient group (Table 2
). Duration of ischemia
(P=0.616), dose of urokinase (P=0.688),
hemorrhage (P=0.369), and asymmetry index
(P=0.957) were not significantly related to the MRS at 6
months.
|
In the cardioembolic infarction group, R/CE ratio
(P<0.0001), NIHSSS at baseline (P<0.0001),
NIHSSS on the following day (P<0.0001), asymmetry index
(P=0.002), age (P=0.0074), and
recanalization grade (P=0.0426) were
significantly correlated to the MRS at 6 months (Table 3
).
|
There were several significant differences between the good outcome
group and the poor outcome group (Table 4
): (1) younger age
(P=0.0007); (2) different distribution of stroke territories
(overall analysis, P=0.006), with a higher
proportion of patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and lower
proportion of patients with internal carotid artery or basilar artery
occlusion; (3) higher amount of SPECT values including both R/CE ratio
and AI (P<0.0001); (4) lower NIHSSS at baseline, the
following day, and 1 month after treatment; and (5) lower incidence of
hemorrhage (P=0.0004).
|
A model of baseline variables exhibiting significant predictive
values of poor outcome compared with good out- come was proposed.
When logic regression was applied to this model, it selected 6
significant variables (Table 5
):
(1) NIHSSS >20 (odds ratio (OR)=6.17, confidence interval (CI)=2.57 to
14.8, P<0.0001); (2) cardioembolic infarction (OR=3.6,
CI=1.31 to 9.86, P=0.0113); (3) R/CE ratio <0.35 (OR=3.0,
CI=1.23 to 7.16, P=0.0118); (4) hemorrhage (OR=2.88,
CI=1.61 to 5.13, P=0.0003); (5)
recanalization grade <3 (OR=2.87, CI=1.58 to 5.21,
P=0.0004); and (6) age >75 years (OR=2.81, CI=1.57 to 5.02,
P=0.0004). There were 32 (42%)patients with an NIHSSS of
>20; of 21 poor outcome patients, 13 died. There were 12 (29%)
patients with an R/CE ratio of <0.35; of 10 poor outcome patients, 7
died.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although NIHSSS has been reported to be an important prognostic indicator in patients with acute ischemic stroke,22 23 24 few reports have analyzed predictive factors related to outcome in patients with intravenous and particularly intra-arterial thrombolysis.14 25 26 The NINDS trial suggested that outcome at 3 months after intravenous r-TPA was related to older age with higher baseline NIHSSS, older age with higher administration mean arterial pressure, and early CT finding.25 Trouillas et al26 reported that significant predictors of poor outcome at 1 year after treatment in 100 patients with intravenous r-TPA were low baseline neurological score, early CT finding, and proximal internal carotid thrombosis. In addition, Gönner et al14 indicated that good outcome at 3 months after treatment in 45 patients with intra-arterial thrombolysis was associated with a baseline NIHSSS of <20, improvement by [me]4 points on NIHSSS within 24 hours, and vessel recanalization.
Our data show that the MRS at 6 months after intra-arterial thrombolysis was significantly related to R/CE ratio, NIHSSS at baseline, NIHSSS on the following day, cardioembolic infarction, age, and recanalization grade in the overall patient group and R/CE ratio, NIHSSS at baseline, NIHSSS on the following day, asymmetry index, age, and recanalization grade in the cardioembolic infarction group. Although only 11% of patients were treated within 3 hours from symptom onset and most patients (82%) were treated between 3 and 6 hours, the interval from symptom onset to treatment does not appear to have a direct effect on clinical outcome at 6 months. The incidence of hemorrhage was 17% (13 patients), and 30% (4 patients) of hemorrhage was asymptomatic. Therefore hemorrhage may not be a significant predictive factor in the overall patient group; however, it had a significant predictive value of poor outcome compared with good outcome.
Severe neurological condition (NIHSSS >20) (OR=6.17, CI=2.57 to 14.8) is likely to be a significant independent predictor of poor outcome. In some recent trials, patients who had severe neurological deficits were excluded.15 27 In our study, there were 32 (42%)patients with a baseline NIHSSS of >20; however, 11 (34%) of these patients had a good outcome. Therefore severe neurological deficits (NIHSSS >20) may not be appropriate as a single exclusion criterion. It may be necessary for optimized patient selection to combine neurological deficits with other predictive variables. In addition, cardioembolic infarction (OR=3.6, CI=1.31 to 9.86), incomplete recanalization (recanalization grade <3) (OR=2.87, CI=1.58 to 5.21), and older age (>75 years) (OR=2.81, CI=1.57 to 5.02) were also significant independent predictors of poor outcome.
A number of natural history studies in the acute stroke setting have reported the relation between SPECT findings and outcome,28 29 30 31 whereas no reports have assessed the predictive value of pretreatment SPECT for long-term outcome in patients with acute stroke who had undergone intra-arterial thrombolysis. Grotta and Alexandrov32 reported that SPECT measurement of cerebral perfusion before and after intravenous r-TPA infusion correlated with outcome and response to therapy. Our data indicate that the residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment SPECT significantly correlated with long-term outcome and was also a key independent predictor of poor outcome (OR=3.0, CI=1.23 to 7.16). Unfortunately, the value of rapid assessment of tissue reversibility before treatment has not been addressed in recent clinical trials of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Recently, however, Ueda et al9 reported that the residual CBF assessed by pretreatment SPECT in patients with acute ischemic stroke with intra-arterial thrombolysis provided important information for determining whether thrombolysis was useful in predicting ischemic outcome, including associated hemorrhagic risk and neurological outcome at any given time. The present study also supports the usefulness of pretreatment SPECT for predicting clinical outcome at 6 months after treatment.
To date, there are no reports in which thrombolytic therapy was investigated on the basis of the cause of the stroke, including cardioembolic and atherosclerotic infarction. Although it is difficult to distinguish between cardioembolic and atherosclerotic infarction in some patients, it may be important to plan treatment strategy considering the cause of acute ischemic stroke. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for cardioembolic infarction was characterized by severe neurological deficits (19.7 of a mean baseline NIHSSS), a high recanalization rate (83% of grade 3 to 4), and a symptomatic hemorrhagic rate (17%). On the other hand, intra-arterial thrombolysis for atherosclerotic infarction showed a high nonrecanalization rate (30%) and no symptomatic hemorrhage. These differences may be due to residual CBF in the ischemic lesion and atherosclerotic changes in the vessel. The mean R/CE ratio and mean asymmetry index assessed by pretreatment SPECT were 0.38 and 1.40, respectively, in patients with cardioembolic infarction and 0.60 and 1.22, respectively, in those with atherosclerotic infarction. In addition, it can be difficult to recanalize completely an occluded vessel with atherosclerotic changes in patients with atherosclerotic infarction.
In conclusion, the residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment SPECT, the NIHSSS at baseline and the following day, age, and recanalization grade correlated significantly with the MRS at 6 months after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. The NIHSSS of >20, R/CE ratio of <0.35, cardioembolic infarction, incomplete recanalization (recanalization grade <3), and older age (>75 years) were determined to be significant independent predictors of poor outcome by multivariable analysis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 19, 1999; revision received July 29, 1999; accepted August 18, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Gonzalez RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS, Schwamm, LH,
Budzik RF, Rordorf G, Wang B, Sorensen AG, Koroshetz WJ.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in
patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset.
Radiology. 1999;210:155162.
3.
Sorensen AG, Copen WA, Ostergaard L, Buonanno FS,
Gonzalez RG, Rordorf G, Ronsen BR, Schwamm, LH, Weisskoff RM, Koroshetz
WJ. Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of
relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow, and mean
tissue transit time. Radiology. 1999;210:519527.
4. Bryan RN. Diffusion-weighted imaging: to treat or not to treat? That is the question. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:396397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Fisher M, Garcia JH. Evolving stroke and the
ischemic penumbra. Neurology. 1996;47:884888.
6. Yuh WTC, Maeda M, Wang AM, Crosby DL, Tien RD, Higashida RT, Tsai FY. Fibrinolytic treatment of acute stroke: are we treating reversible cerebral ischemia? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:19942000.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Alexandrov AV, Masdeu JC, Devous MD Sr, Black SE,
Grotta JC. Brain single-photon emission CT with HMPAO and safety of
thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke:
proceedings of the meeting of the SPECT Safe Thrombolysis
Study Collaborators and the members of the Brain Imaging Council of the
Society of Nuclear Medicine. Stroke. 1997;28:18301834.
8. Ueda T, Hatakeyama T, Kumon Y, Sakaki S, Uraoka T. Evaluation of risk of hemorrhagic transformation in local intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke by initial SPECT. Stroke. 1994;25:298303.[Abstract]
9. Ueda T, Sakaki S, Yuh WTC, Nochide I, Ohta S. Outcome in acute stroke with successful intra-arterial thrombolysis and predictive value of initial single-photon emission-computed tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:99108.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Hacke W, Zeumer H, Ferbert A, Bruchmann H, del Zoppo
GJ. Intra-arterial thrombolytic
therapy improves outcome in patients with acute vertebrobasilar
occlusive disease. Stroke. 1988;19:12161222.
11. Sasaki O, Takeuchi S, Koike T, Koizumi T, Tanaka R. Fibrinolytic therapy for acute embolic stroke: intravenous, intracarotid, and intra-arterial local approaches. Neurosurgery. 1995;36:246253.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Theron J, Courtheoux P, Casasco A, Alachkar F, Notari F, Ganem F, Maiza D. Local intraarterial fibrinolysis in the carotid territory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1989;10:753765.[Abstract]
13. Zeumer H, Freitag HJ, Zanella F, Thie A, Arning C. Local intra-arterial fibrinolytic therapy in patients with stroke: urokinase versus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA). Neuroradiology. 1993;35:159162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Gönner F, Remonda L, Mattle H, Sturzenegger M,
Ozdoda C, Lövblad K-O, Baumgartner R, Bassetti C, Schroth G.
Local intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute
ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:18941900.
15.
del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS,
Rowley HA, Gent M, the PROACT Investigators. PROACT: a phase II
randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct
arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke.
Stroke. 1998;29:411.
16.
Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG,
Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M,
Moomaw CJ, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a
clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864870.
17.
Cerebral Embolism Task Force. Cardiogenic brain
embolism. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:7184.
18.
van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA,
van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap
in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604607.
19. Lassen NA, Andersen AR, Friberg L, Paulson OB. The retention of [99 mTc]-d, l-HM-PAO in the human brain after intracarotid bolus injection: a kinetic analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1988;8:S13S22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Shirahata N, Henriksen L, Vorstrup S, Holm S, Lauritzen M, Paulson OB, Lassen NA. Regional cerebral blood flow assessed by 133Xe inhalation and emission tomography: normal values. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:861866.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Mori E, Yoneda Y, Tabuchi M, Yoshida T, Ohkawa S,
Ohsumi Y, Kitano K, Tsutsumi A, Yamadori A. Intravenous
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in
acute carotid artery territory stroke. Neurology. 1992;42:976982.
22.
Censori B, Camerlingo M, Casto L, Ferraro B, Gazzaniga
GC, Cesana B, Mamoli A. Prognostic factors in first-ever stroke in the
carotid artery territory seen within 6 hours after onset.
Stroke. 1993;24:532535.
23.
Muir KW, Weir CJ, Murray GD, Povey C, Lees KR.
Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke
prognosis. Stroke. 1996;27:18171820.
24.
Pullicino P, Snyder W, Granger C. The NIH stroke scale
and the FIM in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1992;23:919. Letter.
25.
The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group.
Intracerebral hemorrhage after
intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke.
Stroke. 1997;28:21092118.
26.
Trouillas P, Nighoghossian N, Derex L, Adeleine
P, Honorat J, Neuschwander P, Riche G, Getenet J-C, Li W, Froment
J-C, Turjman F, Malicier D, Fournier G, Gabry AL, Ledoux X, Berthezene
Y, Efrench P, Dechavanne M. Thrombolysis with
intravenous rtPA in a series of 100 cases of acute carotid
territory stroke: determination of etiological, topographic, and
radiological outcome factors. Stroke. 1998;29:25292540.
27. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Scheider D, Diez-Tejedor E, Trouillas P, for the Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study investigators. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Lancet. 1998;352:12451251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Alexandrov AV, Black SE, Ehrlich LE, Bladin CF,
Smurawska LT, Pirisi A, Caldwell CB. Simple visual analysis of
brain perfusion on HMPAO SPECT predicts early outcome in acute stroke.
Stroke. 1996;27:15371542.
29. Weir CJ, Bolster AA, Tytler S, Murray GD, Corrigall RS, Adams FG, Lees KR. Prognostic value of single-photon emission tomography in acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:2126.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Barber PA, Davis SM, Infeld B, Baird AE, Donnan GA,
Jolley D, Lichtenstein M. Spontaneous reperfusion after
ischemic stroke is associated with improved outcome.
Stroke. 1998;29:25222528.
31.
Laloux P, Richelle F, Jamart J, De Coster P, Laterre C.
Comparative correlations of HMPAO SPECT indices, neurological score,
and stroke subtypes with clinical outcome in acute carotid infarcts.
Stroke. 1995;26:816821.
32.
Grotta JC, Alexandrov AV. t-PA-associated reperfusion
after acute stroke demonstrated by SPECT. Stroke. 1998;29:429432.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Mandava and T. A. Kent Intra-arterial therapies for acute ischemic stroke Neurology, June 12, 2007; 68(24): 2132 - 2139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ikushima, H. Ohta, T. Hirai, K. Yokogami, D. Miyahara, N. Maeda, and Y. Yamashita Balloon Catheter Disruption of Middle Cerebral Artery Thrombus in Conjunction with Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Embolism AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 513 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 9: Adult Stroke Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-111 - IV-120. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 9: Stroke Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-110 - III-104. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Arnold, K Nedeltchev, L Remonda, U Fischer, C Brekenfeld, B Keserue, G Schroth, and H P Mattle Recanalisation of middle cerebral artery occlusion after intra-arterial thrombolysis: different recanalisation grading systems and clinical functional outcome J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2005; 76(10): 1373 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Christoforidis, Y. Mohammad, D. Kehagias, B. Avutu, and A. P. Slivka Angiographic Assessment of Pial Collaterals as a Prognostic Indicator Following Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2005; 26(7): 1789 - 1797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Wardlaw and O. Mielke Early Signs of Brain Infarction at CT: Observer Reliability and Outcome after Thrombolytic Treatment--Systematic Review Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 444 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Arnold, U Koerner, L Remonda, K Nedeltchev, H P Mattle, G Schroth, M Sturzenegger, J Weber, and F Koerner Comparison of intra-arterial thrombolysis with conventional treatment in patients with acute central retinal artery occlusion J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 76(2): 196 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Schaefer, A. Hassankhani, C. Putman, A. G. Sorensen, L. Schwamm, W. Koroshetz, and R. G. Gonzalez Characterization and Evolution of Diffusion MR Imaging Abnormalities in Stroke Patients Undergoing Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 951 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Arnold, K Nedeltchev, G Schroth, R W Baumgartner, L Remonda, T J Loher, F Stepper, M Sturzenegger, B Schuknecht, and H P Mattle Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalisation and outcome of 40 patients with acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 75(6): 857 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Provenzale, R. Jahan, T. P. Naidich, and A. J. Fox Assessment of the Patient with Hyperacute Stroke: Imaging and Therapy Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 347 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Arnold, K Nedeltchev, H P Mattle, T J Loher, F Stepper, G Schroth, C Brekenfeld, M Sturzenegger, and L Remonda Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 24 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery T occlusions J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2003; 74(6): 739 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Montaner, J. Alvarez-Sabin, C. Molina, A. Angles, S. Abilleira, J. Arenillas, M. A. Gonzalez, and J. Monasterio Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression After Human Cardioembolic Stroke: Temporal Profile and Relation to Neurological Impairment Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1759 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Keris, S. Rudnicka, V. Vorona, G. Enina, B. Tilgale, and J. Fricbergs Combined Intraarterial/Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 352 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Catafau Brain SPECT in Clinical Practice. Part I: Perfusion J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 259 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Brott and J. Bogousslavsky Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke N. Engl. J. Med., September 7, 2000; 343(10): 710 - 722. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |