Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1999;30:2360-2365

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, S.

(Stroke. 1999;30:2360-2365.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Multivariable Analysis of Predictive Factors Related to Outcome at 6 Months After Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Toshihiro Ueda, MD, PhD; Saburo Sakaki, MD, PhD; Yoshiaki Kumon, MD, PhD Shinsuke Ohta, MD, PhD

From the Department of Neurological Surgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.

Correspondence to Toshihiro Ueda, MD, PhD, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Shigenobu-cho, Onsen-gun, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan. E-mail tueda{at}m.ehime-u.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background and Purpose—Recent reports have suggested that a rapid assessment of pretreatment residual cerebral blood flow (CBF) could be used to optimize selection criteria for thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke to improve clinical outcome. We investigated retrospectively residual CBF and other clinical factors related to outcome at 6 months after intra-arterial thrombolysis by using multivariable analysis.

Methods—Seventy-six patients received intra-arterial thrombolysis within 6 hours of symptom onset. The multiple regression method was used to analyze associations between the modified Rankin scale (MRS) at 6 months after treatment and clinical factors including age, infarction type, duration of ischemia, dose of urokinase, degree of recanalization, hemorrhage, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSSS), and residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment single-photon emission-computed tomography; these values were assessed with the use of the regional-to-cerebellar activity (R/CE) ratio of ischemic region to cerebellum and asymmetry index.

Results—MRS at 6 months was good (0 to 3) in 65% and poor (4 to 6) in 35%. Factors significantly related to MRS at 6 months were R/CE ratio (P<0.0001), NIHSSS at baseline and the following day (P<0.0001), cardioembolic infarction (P=0.0014), age (P=0.0074), and recanalization grade (P=0.007). NIHSSS of >20, R/CE ratio of <0.35, cardioembolic infarction, incomplete recanalization (grade <3), and older age (>75 years) were determined to be significant independent predictors of poor outcome.

Conclusions—The residual CBF, neurological score at baseline and the following day, age, and recanalization grade correlated significantly with long-term outcome. The NIHSSS of >20 and R/CE ratio of <0.35 were determined to be significant independent predictors of poor outcome by multivariable analysis.


Key Words: cerebral blood flow • outcome • stroke, ischemic • thrombolytic therapy • tomography, emission computed


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowSubjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, only intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) within 3 hours of symptom onset has been proven to be beneficial in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial.1 The target of this therapy should be viable and/or reversible ischemic tissue that is potentially salvageable with early treatment. This depends on rapid diagnostic techniques2 3 such as single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) and diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that not only can detect early ischemic changes but also can distinguish reversible ischemic tissue from irreversible tissue.4 Although the therapeutic window in humans is generally believed to be the first few hours after the onset of symptoms, there could be variability among individuals, depending on the degree of collateral flow and metabolic status.5 6 Recent reports have suggested that a rapid assessment of residual cerebral blood flow (CBF) by pretreatment SPECT could be used to optimize the selection criteria for thrombolysis not only to improve clinical outcome but to avoid hemorrhagic complications.7 8 9

Although a number of studies without control groups have supported the possibility that intra-arterial thrombolysis might achieve faster, more complete recanalization with less fibrinolytic agent and smaller risk of hemorrhage by direct administration at the site of thrombus,10 11 12 13 14 its efficacy remains to be determined. Recently, the Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT) trial,15 which was the first randomized, double-blind trial of intra-arterial thrombolysis within 6 hours from symptom onset, demonstrated that recanalization was enhanced with pro-urokinase (rpro-UK). However, no prospective studies have assessed the clinical or radiologic predictive variables related to long-term outcome in patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. Particularly, no analysis of the relation between pretreatment cerebral perfusion status and long-term outcome has been reported in prospective studies of either intra-arterial thrombolysis or intravenous thrombolysis. A retrospective study may still be useful to address these issues until a randomized double-blind trial of intra-arterial thrombolysis can be completed and its data made available.

The purpose of this study was to assess predictive factors, including age, infarction type, duration of ischemia, dose of an agent, degree of recanalization, hemorrhage, pretreatment and posttreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSSS),16 and residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment SPECT, related to long-term outcome with the use of multivariable statistical analysis in both cardioembolic and atherosclerotic infarction patients with intra-arterial thrombolysis.


*    Subjects and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Subjects and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A total of 76 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in our institution between April 1990 and August 1996 were evaluated. There were 42 men and 34 women between 35 and 83 years of age (mean±SD, 67±12 years). Patients were classified into a cardioembolic infarction group (53 patients) and an atherosclerotic infarction group (23 patients). Cardioembolic infarction was diagnosed according to the guidelines of the Cerebral Embolism Task Force17 on the basis of onset pattern, angiographic findings, and results of cardiovascular examinations such as electrocardiography and echocardiography. The diagnosis of atherosclerotic infarction was based on clinical, computed tomography (CT), and angiographic findings. Angiographic criteria for atherosclerotic infarction were good collateral circulation with retrograde filling from the anterior or posterior cerebral artery and/or tapered occlusion with extensive atherosclerotic changes. Patients with stroke of unknown cause were excluded from this study.

Our inclusion criteria for intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy were as follows: (1) no apparent hypodensity areas were observed on the admission CT scan, (2) the patient could be treated within 6 hours, in principle, of symptom onset, and (3) occluded arteries suggested by symptoms were demonstrated by cerebral angiography. Six patients who were treated 6 to 7.5 hours after symptom onset were included in this study because they had a good CBF value by pretreatment SPECT. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their relatives. The exclusion criteria were (1) recent hemorrhagic stroke, (2) critical systemic condition, (3) serious disabling disease, and (4) classic contraindications to thrombolytic therapy (recent surgical operation, known bleeding tendency, etc). This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

The patient's neurological status was evaluated on admission, the following day, and 1 week and 1 month after treatment according to NIHSSS, which expresses the severity of neurological status numerically from 0 (normal) to 42. Clinical outcome at 6 months after treatment was assessed according to the modified Rankin scale (MRS)18 : grades 0 to 5 and 6 (death). Factors related to clinical outcome were investigated in all patients, cardioembolic infarction group, and atherosclerotic infarction group. Patients were classified by the MRS into 2 groups: good outcome (MRS 0 to 3) and poor outcome (MRS 4 to 6). First, the multivariable analysis performed with the multiple regression method investigated the association between the MRS at 6 months and clinical factors including age, infarction type, duration of ischemia, dose of urokinase, degree of recanalization, hemorrhage, pretreatment and posttreatment (the following day) NIHSSS, and residual CBF evaluated by SPECT in all patients and cardioembolic infarction group. The MRS at 6 months was analyzed as the dependent variable, whereas the other clinical factors were analyzed as independent variables. There was no analysis of the atherosclerotic infarction group because there were not enough patients for multivariable assessment. Second, significant predictive values of variables of the poor outcome group compared with those of the good outcome group were identified.

CT was performed on all patients immediately after admission. When no clear hypodensity area was noted at the sites suggested by the clinical symptoms, SPECT was performed with the use of 99mTc-labeled hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) and a 4-head gamma camera (SPECT 2000H-40, Hitachi) with a low-energy, high-resolution collimator. Details of our method of analyzing SPECT data were described in previous reports.8 9 In short, of 16 axial sections, the section most clearly showing the ischemic region was selected, and regions of interest (ROIs) were set within the ischemic region (a), the corresponding region on the contralateral side (b), and the entire cerebellar hemisphere on the ischemic side (c), and the mean count was determined in each region. Linear adjustment19 was made by assuming the blood flow in the normal cerebellar hemisphere to be 55 mL/100 g per minute.20 The CBF was assessed semiquantitatively by calculating 2 parameters: (1) the ischemic regional-to-cerebellar activity (R/CE) ratio (R/CE ratio=a/c) and (2) the asymmetry index (AI=1+[b-a]/[a+b]). The ROIs were hand-drawn in apparent whole ischemic areas based on qualitative inspection of the rCBF maps. The contralateral, mirror-image ROI was drawn automatically.

Digital subtraction angiography was performed with the use of a 5F catheter through a femoral artery. Patients were given an intravenous injection of heparin (5000 U) before angiography. The tip of a FasTracker-18 (Target Therapeutics) was advanced into the thrombus or upstream from the occlusion side over a 0.014-inch Taper Dasher guide wire (Target Therapeutics). Urokinase (240 000 U) was dissolved in 20 mL of physiological saline and injected manually for {approx}10 minutes. The maximum dose of urokinase was 960 000 U. Comparing the preinfusion and postinfusion angiograms, restoration of arterial patency was classified into 5 categories by use of the method described by Mori et al21 : grade 0, unchanged; grade 1, movement of thrombus not associated with any improvement in perfusion; grade 2, partial recanalization with reperfusion in <50% of the ischemia-related area; grade 3, partial recanalization with reperfusion in >50% of the ischemia-related area; and grade 4, complete or near-complete recanalization with full return of perfusion. CT was also obtained immediately, the next day, 1 or 2 weeks, and 1 month after treatment.

For statistical analysis, the values were expressed as mean±SD, and differences among 2 or more groups were examined by ANOVA. Multiple regression analyses with and without backward stepwise method were performed to assess the correlation of MRS (dependent variable) with other clinical factors (independent variables). Logic regression analysis was applied to identify the significant predictive values of variables of the poor outcome group compared with the good outcome group. GB-STAT software (Dynamic Microsystems Inc) was used for computerized statistical analyses.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Characteristics and Treatment Results
The baseline characteristics and treatment results are shown in Table 1Down. The interval from symptom onset to recanalization of the occluded vessel was between 1 and 7.5 hours (4.9±1.6 hours), which included 1 to 3 hours (8 patients, 11%), 3 to 6 hours (62 patients, 82%), and 6 to 7.5 hours (6 patients, 7%). Occluded vessels were the internal carotid artery (7 patients in the cardioembolic infarction group and 5 patients in the atherosclerotic infarction group), the middle cerebral artery (39 and 15 patients), the anterior cerebral artery (2 and 0 patients), and the basilar artery (5 and 3 patients). Complete (grade 4) and partial (grades 3 and 2) recanalization of the occluded vessel was observed in 43% and 40%, respectively. The NIHSSS on the following day, at 1 month, and 6 months was reduced significantly from the baseline NIHSSS in both cardioembolic infarction and overall patient groups (P<0.01). The NIHSSS at 1 month and 6 months was also reduced significantly from that on the following day in all 3 groups (P<0.01). The MRS at 6 months was good (scores of 0 to 3) in 65% and poor (scores of 4 to 6) in 35%. Symptomatic and asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation occurred in 9 cases (12%) and 4 cases (5.3%), respectively. A total of 15 patients died after treatment. The causes of death were primary cerebral infarction in 6 patients, hemorrhagic transformation in 6 patients, acute myocardial infarction in 2 patients, and pneumonia in 1 patient.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics and Treatment Results in Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis According to Infarction Group

Multivariable Outcome Studies
Factors significantly related to the MRS at 6 months were as follows: R/CE ratio (P<0.0001), NIHSSS at baseline (P<0.0001), NIHSSS on the following day (P<0.0001), cardioembolic infarction (P=0.0014), age (P=0.0074), and recanalization grade (P=0.007) in the overall patient group (Table 2Down). Duration of ischemia (P=0.616), dose of urokinase (P=0.688), hemorrhage (P=0.369), and asymmetry index (P=0.957) were not significantly related to the MRS at 6 months.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Multiple Regression Analysis of Factors Related to Modified Rankin Scale at 6 Months After Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Stroke

In the cardioembolic infarction group, R/CE ratio (P<0.0001), NIHSSS at baseline (P<0.0001), NIHSSS on the following day (P<0.0001), asymmetry index (P=0.002), age (P=0.0074), and recanalization grade (P=0.0426) were significantly correlated to the MRS at 6 months (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Multiple Regression Analysis of Factors Related to Modified Rankin Scale at 6 Months in Patients With Cardioembolic Stroke

There were several significant differences between the good outcome group and the poor outcome group (Table 4Down): (1) younger age (P=0.0007); (2) different distribution of stroke territories (overall analysis, P=0.006), with a higher proportion of patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and lower proportion of patients with internal carotid artery or basilar artery occlusion; (3) higher amount of SPECT values including both R/CE ratio and AI (P<0.0001); (4) lower NIHSSS at baseline, the following day, and 1 month after treatment; and (5) lower incidence of hemorrhage (P=0.0004).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Comparison of Clinical, Therapeutic, and Pathogenetic Characteristics Between the Good and Poor Outcome Groups

A model of baseline variables exhibiting significant predictive values of poor outcome compared with good out- come was proposed. When logic regression was applied to this model, it selected 6 significant variables (Table 5Down): (1) NIHSSS >20 (odds ratio (OR)=6.17, confidence interval (CI)=2.57 to 14.8, P<0.0001); (2) cardioembolic infarction (OR=3.6, CI=1.31 to 9.86, P=0.0113); (3) R/CE ratio <0.35 (OR=3.0, CI=1.23 to 7.16, P=0.0118); (4) hemorrhage (OR=2.88, CI=1.61 to 5.13, P=0.0003); (5) recanalization grade <3 (OR=2.87, CI=1.58 to 5.21, P=0.0004); and (6) age >75 years (OR=2.81, CI=1.57 to 5.02, P=0.0004). There were 32 (42%)patients with an NIHSSS of >20; of 21 poor outcome patients, 13 died. There were 12 (29%) patients with an R/CE ratio of <0.35; of 10 poor outcome patients, 7 died.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Multivariable Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Predictive Factors of Poor Outcome


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Because the underlying cause of acute ischemic stroke is multifactorial and a number of factors may influence clinical outcome, there is a great need for more information about factors related to clinical outcome. Although this study was not designed to investigate the efficacy of intra-arterial urokinase infusion for improvement of clinical outcome, we attempted to assess retrospectively predictive variables related to long-term outcome in patients with acute stroke who were treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis with the use of multivariable analysis.

Although NIHSSS has been reported to be an important prognostic indicator in patients with acute ischemic stroke,22 23 24 few reports have analyzed predictive factors related to outcome in patients with intravenous and particularly intra-arterial thrombolysis.14 25 26 The NINDS trial suggested that outcome at 3 months after intravenous r-TPA was related to older age with higher baseline NIHSSS, older age with higher administration mean arterial pressure, and early CT finding.25 Trouillas et al26 reported that significant predictors of poor outcome at 1 year after treatment in 100 patients with intravenous r-TPA were low baseline neurological score, early CT finding, and proximal internal carotid thrombosis. In addition, Gönner et al14 indicated that good outcome at 3 months after treatment in 45 patients with intra-arterial thrombolysis was associated with a baseline NIHSSS of <20, improvement by [me]4 points on NIHSSS within 24 hours, and vessel recanalization.

Our data show that the MRS at 6 months after intra-arterial thrombolysis was significantly related to R/CE ratio, NIHSSS at baseline, NIHSSS on the following day, cardioembolic infarction, age, and recanalization grade in the overall patient group and R/CE ratio, NIHSSS at baseline, NIHSSS on the following day, asymmetry index, age, and recanalization grade in the cardioembolic infarction group. Although only 11% of patients were treated within 3 hours from symptom onset and most patients (82%) were treated between 3 and 6 hours, the interval from symptom onset to treatment does not appear to have a direct effect on clinical outcome at 6 months. The incidence of hemorrhage was 17% (13 patients), and 30% (4 patients) of hemorrhage was asymptomatic. Therefore hemorrhage may not be a significant predictive factor in the overall patient group; however, it had a significant predictive value of poor outcome compared with good outcome.

Severe neurological condition (NIHSSS >20) (OR=6.17, CI=2.57 to 14.8) is likely to be a significant independent predictor of poor outcome. In some recent trials, patients who had severe neurological deficits were excluded.15 27 In our study, there were 32 (42%)patients with a baseline NIHSSS of >20; however, 11 (34%) of these patients had a good outcome. Therefore severe neurological deficits (NIHSSS >20) may not be appropriate as a single exclusion criterion. It may be necessary for optimized patient selection to combine neurological deficits with other predictive variables. In addition, cardioembolic infarction (OR=3.6, CI=1.31 to 9.86), incomplete recanalization (recanalization grade <3) (OR=2.87, CI=1.58 to 5.21), and older age (>75 years) (OR=2.81, CI=1.57 to 5.02) were also significant independent predictors of poor outcome.

A number of natural history studies in the acute stroke setting have reported the relation between SPECT findings and outcome,28 29 30 31 whereas no reports have assessed the predictive value of pretreatment SPECT for long-term outcome in patients with acute stroke who had undergone intra-arterial thrombolysis. Grotta and Alexandrov32 reported that SPECT measurement of cerebral perfusion before and after intravenous r-TPA infusion correlated with outcome and response to therapy. Our data indicate that the residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment SPECT significantly correlated with long-term outcome and was also a key independent predictor of poor outcome (OR=3.0, CI=1.23 to 7.16). Unfortunately, the value of rapid assessment of tissue reversibility before treatment has not been addressed in recent clinical trials of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Recently, however, Ueda et al9 reported that the residual CBF assessed by pretreatment SPECT in patients with acute ischemic stroke with intra-arterial thrombolysis provided important information for determining whether thrombolysis was useful in predicting ischemic outcome, including associated hemorrhagic risk and neurological outcome at any given time. The present study also supports the usefulness of pretreatment SPECT for predicting clinical outcome at 6 months after treatment.

To date, there are no reports in which thrombolytic therapy was investigated on the basis of the cause of the stroke, including cardioembolic and atherosclerotic infarction. Although it is difficult to distinguish between cardioembolic and atherosclerotic infarction in some patients, it may be important to plan treatment strategy considering the cause of acute ischemic stroke. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for cardioembolic infarction was characterized by severe neurological deficits (19.7 of a mean baseline NIHSSS), a high recanalization rate (83% of grade 3 to 4), and a symptomatic hemorrhagic rate (17%). On the other hand, intra-arterial thrombolysis for atherosclerotic infarction showed a high nonrecanalization rate (30%) and no symptomatic hemorrhage. These differences may be due to residual CBF in the ischemic lesion and atherosclerotic changes in the vessel. The mean R/CE ratio and mean asymmetry index assessed by pretreatment SPECT were 0.38 and 1.40, respectively, in patients with cardioembolic infarction and 0.60 and 1.22, respectively, in those with atherosclerotic infarction. In addition, it can be difficult to recanalize completely an occluded vessel with atherosclerotic changes in patients with atherosclerotic infarction.

In conclusion, the residual CBF evaluated by pretreatment SPECT, the NIHSSS at baseline and the following day, age, and recanalization grade correlated significantly with the MRS at 6 months after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. The NIHSSS of >20, R/CE ratio of <0.35, cardioembolic infarction, incomplete recanalization (recanalization grade <3), and older age (>75 years) were determined to be significant independent predictors of poor outcome by multivariable analysis.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to thank Phyllis S. Bergman for her expert assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Received April 19, 1999; revision received July 29, 1999; accepted August 18, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Gonzalez RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS, Schwamm, LH, Budzik RF, Rordorf G, Wang B, Sorensen AG, Koroshetz WJ. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology. 1999;210:155–162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Sorensen AG, Copen WA, Ostergaard L, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, Rordorf G, Ronsen BR, Schwamm, LH, Weisskoff RM, Koroshetz WJ. Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow, and mean tissue transit time. Radiology. 1999;210:519–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Bryan RN. Diffusion-weighted imaging: to treat or not to treat? That is the question. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:396–397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Fisher M, Garcia JH. Evolving stroke and the ischemic penumbra. Neurology. 1996;47:884–888.[Free Full Text]

6. Yuh WTC, Maeda M, Wang AM, Crosby DL, Tien RD, Higashida RT, Tsai FY. Fibrinolytic treatment of acute stroke: are we treating reversible cerebral ischemia? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:1994–2000.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Alexandrov AV, Masdeu JC, Devous MD Sr, Black SE, Grotta JC. Brain single-photon emission CT with HMPAO and safety of thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke: proceedings of the meeting of the SPECT Safe Thrombolysis Study Collaborators and the members of the Brain Imaging Council of the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Stroke. 1997;28:1830–1834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Ueda T, Hatakeyama T, Kumon Y, Sakaki S, Uraoka T. Evaluation of risk of hemorrhagic transformation in local intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke by initial SPECT. Stroke. 1994;25:298–303.[Abstract]

9. Ueda T, Sakaki S, Yuh WTC, Nochide I, Ohta S. Outcome in acute stroke with successful intra-arterial thrombolysis and predictive value of initial single-photon emission-computed tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:99–108.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Hacke W, Zeumer H, Ferbert A, Bruchmann H, del Zoppo GJ. Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy improves outcome in patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusive disease. Stroke. 1988;19:1216–1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Sasaki O, Takeuchi S, Koike T, Koizumi T, Tanaka R. Fibrinolytic therapy for acute embolic stroke: intravenous, intracarotid, and intra-arterial local approaches. Neurosurgery. 1995;36:246–253.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Theron J, Courtheoux P, Casasco A, Alachkar F, Notari F, Ganem F, Maiza D. Local intraarterial fibrinolysis in the carotid territory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1989;10:753–765.[Abstract]

13. Zeumer H, Freitag HJ, Zanella F, Thie A, Arning C. Local intra-arterial fibrinolytic therapy in patients with stroke: urokinase versus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA). Neuroradiology. 1993;35:159–162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Gönner F, Remonda L, Mattle H, Sturzenegger M, Ozdoda C, Lövblad K-O, Baumgartner R, Bassetti C, Schroth G. Local intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:1894–1900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS, Rowley HA, Gent M, the PROACT Investigators. PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:4–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M, Moomaw CJ, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Cerebral Embolism Task Force. Cardiogenic brain embolism. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:71–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Lassen NA, Andersen AR, Friberg L, Paulson OB. The retention of [99 mTc]-d, l-HM-PAO in the human brain after intracarotid bolus injection: a kinetic analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1988;8:S13–S22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Shirahata N, Henriksen L, Vorstrup S, Holm S, Lauritzen M, Paulson OB, Lassen NA. Regional cerebral blood flow assessed by 133Xe inhalation and emission tomography: normal values. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:861–866.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Mori E, Yoneda Y, Tabuchi M, Yoshida T, Ohkawa S, Ohsumi Y, Kitano K, Tsutsumi A, Yamadori A. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute carotid artery territory stroke. Neurology. 1992;42:976–982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Censori B, Camerlingo M, Casto L, Ferraro B, Gazzaniga GC, Cesana B, Mamoli A. Prognostic factors in first-ever stroke in the carotid artery territory seen within 6 hours after onset. Stroke. 1993;24:532–535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Muir KW, Weir CJ, Murray GD, Povey C, Lees KR. Comparison of neurological scales and scoring systems for acute stroke prognosis. Stroke. 1996;27:1817–1820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Pullicino P, Snyder W, Granger C. The NIH stroke scale and the FIM in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1992;23:919. Letter.[Free Full Text]

25. The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2109–2118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Trouillas P, Nighoghossian N, Derex L, Adeleine P, Honorat J, Neuschwander P, Riche G, Getenet J-C, Li W, Froment J-C, Turjman F, Malicier D, Fournier G, Gabry AL, Ledoux X, Berthezene Y, Efrench P, Dechavanne M. Thrombolysis with intravenous rtPA in a series of 100 cases of acute carotid territory stroke: determination of etiological, topographic, and radiological outcome factors. Stroke. 1998;29:2529–2540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Scheider D, Diez-Tejedor E, Trouillas P, for the Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study investigators. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Alexandrov AV, Black SE, Ehrlich LE, Bladin CF, Smurawska LT, Pirisi A, Caldwell CB. Simple visual analysis of brain perfusion on HMPAO SPECT predicts early outcome in acute stroke. Stroke. 1996;27:1537–1542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Weir CJ, Bolster AA, Tytler S, Murray GD, Corrigall RS, Adams FG, Lees KR. Prognostic value of single-photon emission tomography in acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:21–26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Barber PA, Davis SM, Infeld B, Baird AE, Donnan GA, Jolley D, Lichtenstein M. Spontaneous reperfusion after ischemic stroke is associated with improved outcome. Stroke. 1998;29:2522–2528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Laloux P, Richelle F, Jamart J, De Coster P, Laterre C. Comparative correlations of HMPAO SPECT indices, neurological score, and stroke subtypes with clinical outcome in acute carotid infarcts. Stroke. 1995;26:816–821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Grotta JC, Alexandrov AV. t-PA-associated reperfusion after acute stroke demonstrated by SPECT. Stroke. 1998;29:429–432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. Mandava and T. A. Kent
Intra-arterial therapies for acute ischemic stroke
Neurology, June 12, 2007; 68(24): 2132 - 2139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
I. Ikushima, H. Ohta, T. Hirai, K. Yokogami, D. Miyahara, N. Maeda, and Y. Yamashita
Balloon Catheter Disruption of Middle Cerebral Artery Thrombus in Conjunction with Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Embolism
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 513 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 9: Adult Stroke
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-111 - IV-120.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 9: Stroke
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-110 - III-104.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Arnold, K Nedeltchev, L Remonda, U Fischer, C Brekenfeld, B Keserue, G Schroth, and H P Mattle
Recanalisation of middle cerebral artery occlusion after intra-arterial thrombolysis: different recanalisation grading systems and clinical functional outcome
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2005; 76(10): 1373 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
G. A. Christoforidis, Y. Mohammad, D. Kehagias, B. Avutu, and A. P. Slivka
Angiographic Assessment of Pial Collaterals as a Prognostic Indicator Following Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2005; 26(7): 1789 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Wardlaw and O. Mielke
Early Signs of Brain Infarction at CT: Observer Reliability and Outcome after Thrombolytic Treatment--Systematic Review
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 444 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Arnold, U Koerner, L Remonda, K Nedeltchev, H P Mattle, G Schroth, M Sturzenegger, J Weber, and F Koerner
Comparison of intra-arterial thrombolysis with conventional treatment in patients with acute central retinal artery occlusion
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 76(2): 196 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. W. Schaefer, A. Hassankhani, C. Putman, A. G. Sorensen, L. Schwamm, W. Koroshetz, and R. G. Gonzalez
Characterization and Evolution of Diffusion MR Imaging Abnormalities in Stroke Patients Undergoing Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 951 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Arnold, K Nedeltchev, G Schroth, R W Baumgartner, L Remonda, T J Loher, F Stepper, M Sturzenegger, B Schuknecht, and H P Mattle
Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalisation and outcome of 40 patients with acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 75(6): 857 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Provenzale, R. Jahan, T. P. Naidich, and A. J. Fox
Assessment of the Patient with Hyperacute Stroke: Imaging and Therapy
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 347 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Arnold, K Nedeltchev, H P Mattle, T J Loher, F Stepper, G Schroth, C Brekenfeld, M Sturzenegger, and L Remonda
Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 24 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery T occlusions
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2003; 74(6): 739 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Montaner, J. Alvarez-Sabin, C. Molina, A. Angles, S. Abilleira, J. Arenillas, M. A. Gonzalez, and J. Monasterio
Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression After Human Cardioembolic Stroke: Temporal Profile and Relation to Neurological Impairment
Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1759 - 1766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
V. Keris, S. Rudnicka, V. Vorona, G. Enina, B. Tilgale, and J. Fricbergs
Combined Intraarterial/Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 352 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. M. Catafau
Brain SPECT in Clinical Practice. Part I: Perfusion
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 259 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Brott and J. Bogousslavsky
Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
N. Engl. J. Med., September 7, 2000; 343(10): 710 - 722.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, S.