(Stroke. 1999;30:2671.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Radiology (M.J.H., J.v.d.G., K.J.v.E., W.P.T.M.M.) and the Department of Functional Anatomy (B.H.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Dr Hartkamp is now at the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsSeventy-five patients with minor disabling neurological deficits and with ICA stenoses or occlusions were categorized into 4 groups according to the severity of ICA obstruction. This patient population reflected a relatively favorable subgroup of cerebral infarction (considering their minor neurological deficits). All subjects underwent magnetic resonance angiography, including magnetic resonance angiography sensitive to flow direction. CW morphology and the size of its components were determined and compared with those values in control subjects (n=100).
ResultsCompared with control subjects, patients demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of entirely complete CW configurations (55% versus 36%, P=0.02), complete anterior configurations (88% versus 68%, P=0.002), and complete posterior CW configurations (63% versus 47%, P=0.04). Patients with severe ICA stenosis did not show significantly increased CW vessel diameters. Patients with ICA occlusion demonstrated a high prevalence of collateral flow through the anterior CW and significantly increased diameters of the communicating channels. Patients with bilateral ICA occlusion relied on collateral flow via the posterior CW and demonstrated a bilateral increase in posterior communicating artery diameters (P<0.05).
ConclusionsThe anatomic and functional configuration of the CW reflects the degree of ICA obstruction.
Key Words: angiography, magnetic resonance carotid arteries cerebral circulation circle of Willis collateral circulation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical manifestations of ICA obstruction included transient ischemic attack (n=25), minor stroke (n=41), transient monocular blindness (amaurosis fugax, n=4), and chronic ocular ischemia (n=5). Patients that had suffered a severely disabling stroke were excluded (Rankin scale 4 or 5). Each side of every circle was designated either the asymptomatic side or the symptomatic side, which corresponded to the side with the most severe ICA obstruction and which was responsible for the (most severe) clinical features. (In patients classified into group OO, the hemisphere causing the severest symptoms was designated the symptomatic side.) Accordingly, vessel segments belonging to the symptomatic side of the CW are indicated by the suffix SS, whereas those on the asymptomatic side are indicated by the suffix AS. Signed informed consent was received from all subjects, and approval was obtained from the institutions commission on scientific research on human subjects. Procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines.
MR Angiography
MRA of the CW was performed on a 1.5-T system (Philips Gyroscan
NT, Philips Medical Systems). The MRA imaging protocol consisted of a
2-dimensional phase-contrast (2D PC) sagittal localizer survey through
the CW, followed by a 3-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) MRA
sequence with the following imaging parameters: repetition
time/echo time, 30 ms/6.9 ms; flip angle, 20°; field of view,
100x100 mm; matrix size, 128x128; reconstruction matrix,
256x256; 0.78x0.78-mm pixel resolution
(0.61-mm2 pixel area); number of excitations, 2;
slice thickness, 1.2 mm; gap width, -0.6 mm (ie, slices
overlapped by 0.6 mm); slice orientation, transverse; number of
slices, 50; and stack volume, 30 mm. The direction of blood flow
in the A1 segments of both anterior cerebral arteries (ACAs) and in the
PCoAs was determined by using two 2D PC sequences, of which one was
phase encoded in the anteroposterior direction and another in the
left-right direction. The imaging parameters of both 2D PC
directional flow acquisitions were as follows: repetition time/echo
time, 16 ms/9.1 ms; flip angle, 7.5°; field of view, 250x250
mm; rectangular field of view, 100%; matrix size, 256x256; number of
excitations, 8; slice thickness, 13 mm; slice orientation,
transverse; single slice; and velocity sensitivity (velocity encoding
value), 40 cm/s. Two collateral flow pathways were considered with MRA:
(1) collateral flow through the ACoA resulting in retrograde flow in
the A1 segment on the symptomatic side toward the affected
ICA and (2) posterior to anterior (collateral) flow through the
ipsilateral PCoA.
Diameter Measurements and Morphology
The presence of CW vessels and measurement of their diameters
were determined on the 3D TOF stack by use of a dedicated workstation
(Easy vision, Philips Medical Systems; measurement software implemented
in the workstation). The anterior and posterior parts of the CW were
classified according to the scheme of variant types as demonstrated in
Figures 1
and 2
. Anterior types a through f
(Figure 1
) are examples of complete anterior configurations, and
posterior types a through c (Figure 2
) represent
complete posterior configurations. The entire circle morphology was
then assessed as to completeness of the anterior and posterior parts of
the circle combined and compared with the prevalence of CW completeness
characteristics in control subjects. Circle parts were classified as
deficient if one of the component vessel segments was hypoplastic
(diameter measuring <0.8 mm) or absent. The percentage of
complete circle parts was calculated and compared with that of control
subjects. Circles with fetal-type posterior cerebral arteries (PCAs)
were also eligible for classification as complete provided that all
segments were intact and measured at least 0.8 mm in
diameter.7 Because the anastomotic potential of the circle
was our primary interest, we used this classification as to the
completeness of the circular configuration rather than any classic
definition of a "normal" circle. Diameter measurements were
performed on the transverse (source) slices of the 3D TOF MRA data set
(for all ACoAs, A1 segments of the ACAs, PCoAs, and P1 segments of the
PCAs). Mean vessel diameters were calculated for the patient groups and
compared with mean values for normal control subjects. Diameters
measuring <0.8 mm were considered hypoplastic.7
|
|
The direction of blood flow in the various CW component vessels was determined by inspection on the anteroposterior and left-right encoded 2D PC images combined. Flow in the A1 segment of the ACA on the symptomatic side (A1 SS) was classified as collateral when directed toward the symptomatic ICA. PCoA flow was designated collateral when directed anteriorly. The prevalences of collateral A1 flow and collateral PCoA flow were compared among the different categories of ICA obstruction.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between patients and control subjects in the
prevalence of the anatomic variant types of the anterior and posterior
parts of the CW and the completeness characteristics of the entire CWs
were analyzed with the Fisher exact test (Tables 1 to 3![]()
![]()
). Analysis of diameter differences between
groups C, S, O, OS, and OO (Table 4
) and between groups with
collateral flow versus those without (Tables 5
and 6
) was
performed with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis
H test. Paired analysis of differences was performed
with the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. A
value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All data are expressed as mean±SD. Statistical significance was
corrected for repeated measurements (Dunn multiple comparison
procedure).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Posterior Variant Types
Table 2
lists the prevalence of each
of the posterior circle variant types corresponding to the schematic
types as illustrated in Figure 2
. Patients demonstrated a
significantly higher percentage of complete posterior circle
configurations on MR angiograms (63%) than did the control subjects
(47%, P=0.04). The distribution shifted toward an increase
in type a at the expense of types b, c, e, and g in the patient
group.
General Characteristics of the Circles
Table 3
lists the percentages of
circles with an entirely complete configuration and with a partially
complete configuration, such as a complete symptomatic side
(the presence of the A1 AS, ACoA, A1 SS, PCoA SS, and P1 SS) or a
complete asymptomatic side (the presence of the A1 SS,
ACoA, A1 AS, PCoA AS, and P1 AS). The percentage of partially complete
circles in control subjects was calculated by averaging the percentage
of complete "left" and "right" circles. We found that patients
with carotid lesions had a significantly (P=0.02) higher
percentage of entirely complete circle configurations than did
controls. The percentage of complete CW configurations was highest on
the symptomatic side (P=0.001). No trend was
found in the completeness of the CW with respect to severity of the
carotid lesion: an entirely complete CW configuration was found in 54%
of group S, 58% of group O, 40% of group OS, and 56% of group OO
compared with 36% of control subjects. The configuration of the CW on
the symptomatic side (the A1 AS, ACoA, A1 SS, PCoA SS, and
P1 SS) was complete in 68% of group S, 78% of group O, 64% of group
OS, and 67% of group OO compared with 42% of control subjects.
Figure 3
demonstrates a typical example
of a complete CW configuration.
|
Diameter Measurements
Table 4
demonstrates the mean
diameters for control subjects and for each of the patient groups. This
table shows that patients with severe stenosis of the ICA
(group S) do not have significantly increased vessel diameters of the
CW. Seven percent of these patients showed collateral flow through the
A1 segment of the ACA on the symptomatic side, whereas
collateral flow via the PCoA on the symptomatic side was
found in 21% of these (group S) patients.
All patients with unilateral ICA occlusion (groups O and OS) demonstrated a statistically significant increase in ACoA and A1 AS diameters. Collateral flow via the anterior CW was present in 70% (group O) and 46% (group OS). Furthermore, we found a statistically significant increase in diameter of the PCoA on the symptomatic side and of the P1 segments on both sides. Collateral flow through the PCoA on the symptomatic side was found in 41% (group O) and 36% (group OS).
Patients with bilateral ICA occlusions (group OO) demonstrated a statistically significant increase in ACoA diameter but no significant increase in the diameter of the A1 AS. Eleven percent (n=1) of these patients demonstrated collateral flow via the anterior CW. Group OO patients also demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the diameter of the PCoA and P1 segments on both sides. Seventy-eight percent of group OO demonstrated collateral flow via the PCoA on the symptomatic side, and 89% of group OO demonstrated collateral flow via the asymptomatic PCoA.
Tables 5
and 6
show mean vessel diameter values
according to the presence or absence of collateral flow via the ACoA
and A1 SS or via the PCoA SS, respectively. Table 5
demonstrates
that the diameters of the ACoA and A1 AS are significantly increased in
the presence of collateral flow via the anterior circle. Without
collateral flow, these vessel diameters are within normal limits. When
collateral flow is present in the PCoA on the
symptomatic side, the diameter of this artery is
significantly increased. The diameter of the P1 SS is significantly
increased irrespective of the presence of collateral flow via the
PCoA.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An inevitable prerequisite for inclusion into this in vivo study was that patients had survived ICA obstruction. Possession of an arterial circle with collateral potential (favoring a "relatively complete" configuration) is inherent to this prerequisite and results in population selection. Therefore, it is fair to conclude that this patient population represents a subgroup of the entire population with a higher prevalence of favorable circle configurations. Whether the configurations of these circles represented preexistent morphological variants as opposed to acquired morphology secondary to hemodynamic adaptation elicited by progressive ICA obstruction over time cannot be differentiated retrospectively. However, the general trend toward increasing diameters of the communicating channels indicates that remodeling of CW morphology does occur.
Limitations
The results of the present study were influenced by at least 2
factors. First, the patients and control subjects were not age- and
sex-matched (control group, mean age 70.7 years and 46% male;
patients, mean age 62.1 years and 77% male). Second, 3D TOF MRA is
known to have lower sensitivity for detecting low or turbulent
flow.
The results of our previous study, in which only control subjects were
described, demonstrated that the MR angiographic diameters of CW
components tended to decrease with age and that these diameters also
tended to be larger in males.7 Although both the age and
sex mismatches between the patients and control population will likely
have contributed to the finding of increased CW vessel diameters in our
patient population, this effect is expected to be small. Only a
relatively small (
0.1 mm) age effect was found over a range of
48 years in the control group.7 Considering that the mean
age difference between patients and control subjects in this study was
only 8.6 years, the large differences in mean vessel diameters between
patients and control subjects found in the present study cannot be
accounted for by a mismatch in mean age of these populations only.
Similar differences in vessel diameter were found between males and
females in the control study. Although the percentage of males was
higher in our patient population than in the control group, it is
expected that this mismatch contributes only slightly to the increased
CW vessel diameter in patients.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the control group was recruited from a population-based study, as described previously.7 The medical histories of our control group subjects (n=100) included cerebrovascular accident (n=2), myocardial infarction (n=4), diabetes mellitus (n=8), transient ischemic attack (n=3), hypertension (n=32), and viral meningitis (n=2). It should be realized that our control group, therefore, does not reflect a healthy control group but rather a cross section of the normal Dutch population at this age. Although we did not find a relation between the medical history of subjects and vessel diameter or CW configuration in our control group, the remote possibility that the history of these 51 control subjects may indeed have affected the "normal control" values used in the present study cannot be excluded.
A second important limitation of the present study is related to the use of 3D TOF MRA in evaluating the presence of small intracranial arteries. It is well known that the sensitivity of 3D TOF MRA decreases when blood flow velocity decreases. As was mentioned above, age- and sex-related differences in blood flow velocity between controls and ICA-obstructed patients are expected to have had little or no influence on the diameters found in the present study. However, hemodynamic adaptations (resulting in increased flow through the collateral channels) does result in improved sensitivity of MRA in detecting these vessels. As flow increases through small vessels, visibility on TOF MR angiograms improves24 ; consequently, fewer vessel segments are classified as hypoplastic or absent. Thus, as the functionality of the CW vessels improves, their visibility on TOF MR angiograms also improves relative to the normal control subjects. Because the primary collateral pathways may carry slow or negligible flow in the absence of ICA obstruction, it is likely that the prevalence of complete CW configurations in control subjects may have been underestimated because of impaired visualization of nonfunctional communicating vessels.7 Conversely, transcranial ultrasound studies have indicated that the primary collateral pathways and their parent arteries, A1 SS and P1 SS, develop severe turbulence when used as CW collaterals. It is known that turbulence may lead to loss of signal intensity on TOF MRA and, thus, to underestimation of vessel diameters. Therefore, it remains unclear whether collateral cross flow leads to either an overestimation or to an underestimation of the vessel diameters on MR angiograms.
Hemodynamics
Collateral Flow in the A1 SS
Collateral (reversed) flow through the symptomatic A1
was not accompanied by any statistically significant mean diameter
increase in this vessel. However, when flow was collateral in the
symptomatic A1, we did find statistically significant
diameter increases in the asymptomatic A1 and ACoA. This
reflects additional blood flow through the asymptomatic A1,
which is needed to supply collateral flow to its counterpart.
Collateral flow in the anterior CW develops as a result of a blood
pressure gradient across the ACoA, and this concept forms the basis of
hemodynamic adaptation. The pressure gradient results
from the blood pressure difference between the poststenotic or
postocclusional ICA branches compared with the blood pressure in the
contralateral ICA branches, which may be normal (or reduced because of
stenosis or occlusion). In group S, only very few patients
developed collateral flow through the anterior or posterior circle,
indicating that stenosed ICAs are able to provide an adequate
contribution. In patients with a unilateral ICA occlusion (group O), an
evident asymmetry of perfusion pressure between the 2 ICAs, in
combination with increased demand on the occluded side, results in
collateral flow in the majority of anterior circles (70%). As the
severity of ICA obstruction on the asymptomatic side
increases (group OS), asymmetry in arterial pressure across
the anterior circle becomes less evident than in group O, but in
combination with increased demand on the occluded side of the brain, it
still brings about flow reversal through the A1 on the
symptomatic side in 46% of cases. In patients with
bilateral occlusion, asymmetry in arterial pressure between
the symptomatic and asymptomatic ICA does not
apply or is negligible. Although flow reversal in the anterior circle
is therefore uncommon in group OO, we did find a statistically
significant increase in the ACoA diameter in this patient group. An
explanation might be that patients with bilateral ICA occlusion first
develop a unilateral stenosis or occlusion of the ICA with
cross flow through the ACoA and a corresponding diameter increase of
this vessel. Later, when the contralateral ICA becomes increasingly
obstructed, this cross flow through the ACoA disappears, and the ACoA
returns only partially to its original diameter. Consequently, in
patients with bilateral ICA occlusions, a large diameter of the ACoA
does not guarantee the presence of collateral flow.
Collateral Flow in the PCoA SS
The PCoAs demonstrated a trend toward increased mean diameter when
flow through this vessel was collateral. A statistically significant
increase in mean diameter for the P1 segments on both the
symptomatic and asymptomatic side was found in
groups O, OS, and OO, irrespective of flow direction through the
arterial circle. This indicates that when at least one ICA
is occluded, the blood flow in the posterior circulation increases.
Surprisingly, our results show that flow in both P1 segments increases
when only one ICA is occluded. It might be that because of the drop in
arterial pressure in the (ipsilateral) anterior system and
the subsequent use of the ACoA as a collateral pathway, the perfusion
pressure in symptomatic middle cerebral artery (MCA)
territory as well as in the asymptomatic MCA territory is
reduced, leading to an increased flow territory of both PCAs and
therefore to increased P1 diameters bilaterally. This is in agreement
with the finding that blood flow through the basilar artery is
increased in these patients.26 This phenomenon cannot be
ascribed to collateral flow through the ipsilateral PCoA only, because
in patients without collateral PCoA flow, basilar artery flow is also
increased.27
Considering the collateral contribution of the PCoAs, it is noted that 21% of group S demonstrated collateral PCoA flow, although the mean diameter increase in these cases was negligible. A minimal diameter increase indicates that the collateral contribution of the PCoA in group S is small, because it does not induce remodeling to accommodate increased volume flow. An interesting observation is that the prevalence of collateral ACoA flow was higher in group O than it was in group OS, although the prevalence of collateral PCoA flow was similar in groups O and OS. Apparently, as the asymptomatic ICA becomes increasingly obstructed, the option of recruiting collateral flow via the anterior circle gradually decreases because of a decreasing pressure gradient over the ACoA (decreased supply from the asymptomatic ICA). We expected that this would be accompanied by a significant increase in the relative contribution of PCoA collateral flow in group OS; however, this occurred only in patients with bilateral ICA occlusions. This implies that the anterior circle is the preferential mode of collateral supply for patients with unilateral ICA occlusion. As the contralateral ICA becomes completely occluded, resulting in bilateral ICA occlusion, the option of supplying collateral flow through the anterior circle is lost, and alternative collateral flow pathways such as the PCoAs become the most important route in bilateral ICA occlusions. One might question why the PCoA is not the preferred route of supply in cases of unilateral occlusion. An explanation might be that resistance to flow across the PCoA is greater than across the ACoA, because the PCoA is usually a longer vessel. Longer vessels result in an increased resistance to flow that is due to the larger area of endoluminal vessel wall available for friction.
The observations in the present study demonstrate that the development of collateral flow through the CW is governed by morphological factors, such as an individuals anatomic configuration of the circle, as well as related hemodynamic factors, such as increased flow through the primary pathways, flow reversal, and vasodilatation. Although preexistent morphological characteristics are a precondition determining the patterns of hemodynamic adaptations that are able occur, the subsequent hemodynamic changes themselves may induce remodeling of CW morphology. This is reflected in the significant increases in ACoA and PCoA diameters on the symptomatic side, for all grades of ICA obstruction, as collateral flow increases through these vessels.
Comparison Between Authors
The results of the present study show that patients with
severe ICA lesions have a much higher percentage of complete circle
configurations (55%) than would have been expected on the basis of
autopsy studies. Alpers and Berry28 reported that only
33% of autopsy brains with cerebral softening demonstrated a normal
configuration of the CW. Riggs and Rupp29 investigated
autopsy brains taken from adults with evidence of neurological
dysfunction and classified only 21% of the arterial
circles as normal. Miralles et al3 investigated the
circles of 38 patients with carotid artery occlusion in vivo and found
high percentages of complete anterior circles (60%) and complete
posterior circles (74%), in agreement with the results of the
present study (88% and 63%, respectively). A higher percentage of
complete circles in living patients with ICA obstruction compared with
the autopsy populations as described by Alpers and Berry and Riggs and
Rupp is likely due to (1) the use of 3D TOF MRA and (2) differences
in the patient populations studied. As was discussed earlier, the
effect of increased (collateral) flow in the CW on the sensitivity of
3D TOF MRA remains unclear. However, our previous study,7
in which MRA results were compared with autopsy results from a study of
Hillen6 based on 100 normal adult brains, demonstrated
that 3D TOF MRA might slightly overestimate vessel diameters. This may
also partially account for the higher number of complete circle
configurations found in the present study compared with autopsy
studies. Another explanation for the higher percentage of complete
circles found in the present study could be that Alpers and Berry
performed autopsy studies, whereas our patient population consisted of
a relative favorable subgroup of cerebral infarction survivors (Rankin
scale <4). The differences in CW configurations found in these study
populations may therefore indicate the protective role of the CW in
survivors of ICA occlusive disease.
Other studies have investigated collateral pathways in the CW in patients with ICA occlusion, although the role of the primary pathways in relation to differing grades of ICA obstruction has not been investigated extensively before. Two such studies focused on the relative importance of the anterior or posterior circle as separate entities in preventing hypoperfusion infarction (watershed/low-flow/ischemic infarction). The study by Miralles et al3 concluded that the relative risk of hypoperfusion infarctions was significantly higher in cases with a nonfunctioning ACoA. Schomer et al,4 however, concluded that the presence of a large ipsilateral PCoA was the only feature that correlated significantly with the absence of a watershed infarct. CW hemodynamics are influenced by the presence of retrograde flow through the ophthalmic artery, the prevalence of which differed greatly among the aforementioned study populations: 92%3 versus 37%.4 This may well explain the differences in their observations. Moreover, whereas the population studied by Miralles et al included only unilateral occlusions, the population investigated by Schomer et al included 3 patients with bilateral ICA occlusions, affecting 6 hemispheres of the 32 studied (19%). In light of our results, which demonstrate that the PCoA is more important in cases of bilateral ICA occlusions than it is in cases of unilateral ICA occlusion, we may safely presume that in the study of Schomer et al, the inclusion of bilateral ICA occlusion patients in the population affected the results. Consequently, the role of PCoA appeared to be of more importance in preventing cerebral ischemia in the report of Schomer et al. In the present study, 7 (78%) of 9 patients with bilateral occlusions showed retrograde flow though the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery. Therefore, it is likely that in patients with bilateral ICA occlusion, collateral flow via both the PCoA and ophthalmic artery is important. Our results indicate that although this is true for bilateral ICA occlusion patients, the ACoA is the preferred collateral route in unilateral ICA occlusion.
A recent transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasonography (TCCS) study by Baumgartner et al30 investigated 93 patients with severe stenoses or occlusions (n=2) of the ICA and showed an even higher prevalence of functionally complete configurations. That study detected collateral flow through the ACoA in 98% of patients with obstructive carotid artery disease. In the present study, 88% of patients demonstrated a patent anterior circle. In the study of Baumgartner et al, collateral flow through the PCoA was detected in 84% of the study population, which compares with 63% in the present study. The results of Baumgartner et al are in agreement with those of Muller and Schimrigk,31 who reported a 95% sensitivity for transcranial Doppler ultrasound detecting a functional ACoA and 87% sensitivity for detecting a functional PCoA. In contrast, another TCCS study showed much lower values: Martin et al32 demonstrated the presence of the ACoA in at least 66% and a functioning PCoA in 34% of patients with an ICA occlusion. For patients with ICA stenosis of >80%, these percentages were 51% and 29%, respectively. These differences between MRA and TCCS are likely to be caused by differences in technical approach between the 2 techniques.
Cross flow to the MCA via the anterior circle is reported in 93%3 and 62%4 of ICA occlusion patients, and anteriorly directed flow in the PCoA is reported in 68%.3 Similar observations were made in the present study: in corresponding patients (group O plus OS) collateral flow was seen most frequently through the anterior circle (63% demonstrated collateral flow) and less frequently through the PCoA on the symptomatic side (39%). (Schomer et al4 report the presence of the PCoA in 59% and note anteriorly directed flow in the larger of these, ie, diameter >1 mm, but do not provide flow directional data for the remaining smaller vessels.)
Conclusion
Patients with ICA obstruction with minor disabling neurological
deficits demonstrate a higher prevalence of complete
arterial configurations, and those with at least one ICA
occlusion demonstrate statistically significant mean diameter increases
of the CW collateral vessel segments compared with diameter increases
in controls. Patients without occlusion (but with significant
stenosis) of the ICA do not have significantly altered vessel
diameters, although the ipsilateral configuration of the CW is more
often complete in this stenosis patient group as well. Patients
with unilateral ICA occlusion, with and without a significant
contralateral ICA stenosis, have a higher prevalence of
collateral flow via the anterior CW than via the posterior CW,
indicating that the anterior circle is the preferred route of supply in
unilateral ICA occlusion. Patients with bilateral ICA occlusions,
however, fully rely on collateral flow via the posterior circulation.
Ultimately, therefore, the anatomic and functional configuration of the
CW reflects the severity of ICA obstruction.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 30, 1999; revision received August 20, 1999; accepted September 9, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Mull M, Schwarz M, Thron A. Cerebral hemispheric
low-flow infarcts in arterial occlusive disease: lesion
patterns and angiomorphological conditions. Stroke. 1997;28:118123.
3. Miralles M, Dolz JL, Cotillas J, Aldoma J, Santiso MA, Gimenez A, Capdevila A, Cairols MA. The role of the circle of Willis in carotid occlusion: assessment with phase contrast MR angiography and transcranial duplex. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995;10:424430.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Schomer DF, Marks MP, Steinberg GK, Johnstone IM,
Boothroyd DB, Ross MR, Pelc NJ, Enzmann DR. The anatomy of the
posterior communicating artery as a risk factor for ischemic
cerebral infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:15651570.
5. Hillen B. The variability of the circulus arteriosus (Willisii): order or anarchy. Acta Anat (Basel). 1987;129:7480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hillen B. The variability of the circle of Willis: univariate and bivariate analysis. Acta Morphol Neth Scand. 1986;24:87101.
7.
Krabbe-Hartkamp MJ, van der Grond J, de Leeuw FE, de
Groot JC, Algra A, Hillen B, Breteler MMB, Mali WPTM. Circle of Willis:
morphological variation on MR angiograms. Radiology. 1998;207:103111.
8. Macchi C, Catini C, Federico C, Gulisano M, Pacini P, Cecchi F, Corcos L, Brizzi E. Magnetic resonance angiographic evaluation of circulus arteriosus cerebri (circle of Willis): a morphologic study in 100 human healthy subjects. Ital J Anat Embryol. 1996;101:115123.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Barboriak DP, Provenzale JM. Pictorial review: magnetic resonance angiography of arterial variants at the circle of Willis. Clin Radiol.. 1997;52:429436.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Cassot F, Vergeur V, Bossuet P, Hillen B, Zagzoule M,
Marc-Vergnes JP. Effects of anterior communicating artery diameter on
cerebral hemodynamics in internal carotid artery
disease: a model study. Circulation. 1995;92:31223131.
11. Hillen B, Drinkenburg BAH, Hoogstraten HW, Post L. Analysis of flow and vascular resistance in a model of the circle of Willis. J Biomech. 1988;21:807814.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Dickey PS, Kailasnath P, Bloomgarden G, Goodrich I, Chaloupka J. Computer modeling of cerebral blood flow following internal carotid artery occlusion. Neurol Res. 1996;18:259266.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Anzola GP, Gasparotti R, Magoni M, Prandini F.
Transcranial Doppler sonography and magnetic resonance
angiography in the assessment of collateral hemispheric flow in
patients with carotid artery disease. Stroke. 1995;26:214217.
14. Baumgartner RW, Baumgartner I, Mattle HP, Schroth G. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in unilateral flow-restrictive extracranial carotid artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:777783.[Abstract]
15. Baumgartner RW, Baumgartner I, Mattle HP, Schroth G. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in the evaluation of collateral flow through the circle of Willis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:127133.[Abstract]
16. Doblar DD. Cerebrovascular assessment of the high-risk patient: the role of transcranial Doppler ultrasound. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:314.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Klotzsch C, Popescu O, Berlit P. Assessment of the
posterior communicating artery by transcranial color-coded
duplex sonography. Stroke. 1996;27:486489.
18. Zbornikova V, Lassvik C. Relationship between the flow pattern and vasomotor reactivity in the ophthalmic artery, siphon and vessels within the circle of Willis in unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion. Neurol Res. 1996;18:521527.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Bladin CF, Colchester AC, Hawkes DJ, Seifalian AM,
Iqbal N, Hardingham CR. Morphological and
hemodynamic assessments of carotid stenosis
using quantitative digital subtraction angiography. Stroke. 1996;27:16721678.
20. Patrick JT, Fritz JV, Adamo JM, Dandonna P. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for the determination of cerebrovascular reserve. J Neuroimaging. 1996;6:137143.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ross MR, Pelc NJ, Enzmann DR. Qualitative phase contrast MRA in the normal and abnormal circle of Willis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14:1925.[Abstract]
22. Davis WL, Turski PA, Gorbatenko KG, Weber D. Correlation of cine MR velocity measurements in the internal carotid artery with collateral flow in the circle of Willis: preliminary study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:603609.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Stock KW, Wetzel S, Kirsch E, Bongartz G, Steinbrich W, Radue EW. Anatomic evaluation of the circle of Willis: MR angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:14951499.[Abstract]
24. Patrux B, Laissy JP, Jouini S, Kawiecki W, Coty P, Thiébot J. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the circle of Willis: a prospective comparison with conventional angiography in 54 subjects. Neuroradiology. 1994;36:193197.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (NASCET). Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445453.[Abstract]
26.
Van Everdingen KJ, Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, Mali WPTM,
van der Grond J. MRA flow quantification in patients with a
symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion: the Dutch
EC-IC bypass study group. Stroke. 1997;28:15951600.
27. Van Everdingen GH, Visser KJ, Klijn CJ, Kappelle LJ, Mali WPTM, van der Grond J. Role of collateral flow on cerebral hemodynamics in patients with a unilateral ICA occlusion. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:167176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Alpers BJ, Berry RG. Circle of Willis in cerebral vascular disorders. Arch Neurol. 1963;8:398402.
29. Riggs HE, Rupp C. Variation in form of circle of Willis. Arch Neurol. 1963;8:814.
30. Baumgartner RW, Baumgartner I, Mattle HP, Schroth G. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in the evaluation of collateral flow through the circle of Willis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:127133.
31.
Muller M, Schimrigk K. Vasomotor reactivity and pattern
of collateral blood flow in severe occlusive carotid artery disease.
Stroke. 1996;27:296299.
32. Martin PJ, Smith JL, Gaunt ME, Naylor AR. Assessment of intracranial primary collaterals using transcranial color- coded real-time sonography. J Neuroimaging. 199;5:199205.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Malamateniou, M.E. Adams, L. Srinivasan, J.M. Allsop, S.J. Counsell, F.M. Cowan, J.V. Hajnal, and M.A. Rutherford The Anatomic Variations of the Circle of Willis in Preterm-at-Term and Term-Born Infants: An MR Angiography Study at 3T AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2009; 30(10): 1955 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Poullis and R. Poole Mathematical Modeling in Cardiac Surgery: Helping Clinical Trials Answer the Question Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2009; 13(2): 81 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Proweller, A. C. Wright, D. Horng, L. Cheng, M. M. Lu, J. J. Lepore, W. S. Pear, and M. S. Parmacek Notch signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells is required to pattern the cerebral vasculature PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16275 - 16280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Papantchev, S. Hristov, D. Todorova, E. Naydenov, A. Paloff, D. Nikolov, A. Tschirkov, and W. Ovtscharoff Some variations of the circle of Willis, important for cerebral protection in aortic surgery -- a study in Eastern Europeans Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 982 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Satoh, M. Omi, C. Ohsako, K. Fujiwara, K. Tsuno, W. Sasahara, K. Onoda, K. Tokunaga, K. Sugiu, and I. Date Differential Diagnosis of the Infundibular Dilation and Aneurysm of Internal Carotid Artery: Assessment with Fusion Imaging of 3D MR Cisternography/Angiography. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Moftakhar, A. S. Turk, D. B. Niemann, S. Hussain, S. Rajpal, T. Cook, M. Geraghty, B. Aagaard-Kienitz, P. A. Turski, and G. C. Newman Effects of Carotid or Vertebrobasilar Stent Placement on Cerebral Perfusion and Cognition AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2005; 26(7): 1772 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fiehler, K. Knudsen, G. Thomalla, E. Goebell, M. Rosenkranz, C. Weiller, J. Rother, H. Zeumer, and T. Kucinski Vascular Occlusion Sites Determine Differences in Lesion Growth from Early Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Lesion to Final Infarct AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1056 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Liebeskind and L. H. Sansing Willisian collateralization Neurology, July 27, 2004; 63(2): 344 - 344. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C.F. Jongen, C. L. Franke, L. M.P. Ramos, J. T. Wilmink, and J. van Gijn Direction of Flow in Posterior Communicating Artery on Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients With Occipital Lobe Infarcts Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 104 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W.J. Hoksbergen, C. B.L. Majoie, F.-J. H. Hulsmans, and D. A. Legemate Assessment of the Collateral Function of the Circle of Willis: Three-Dimensional Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Compared with Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2003; 24(3): 456 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.S.Y. Ho, C. Metreweli, and C.H. Yu Color Velocity Imaging Quantification in the Detection of Intracranial Collateral Flow Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1795 - 1798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Szabo, R. Kern, A. Gass, J. Hirsch, and M. Hennerici Acute Stroke Patterns in Patients With Internal Carotid Artery Disease : A Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Stroke, June 1, 2001; 32(6): 1323 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yanamoto, I. Nagata, Y. Niitsu, Z. Zhang, J.-H. Xue, N. Sakai, H. Kikuchi, and C. Iadecola Prolonged Mild Hypothermia Therapy Protects the Brain Against Permanent Focal Ischemia Editorial Comment Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 232 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Rutgers, C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, A. C. van Huffelen, and J. van der Grond A Longitudinal Study of Collateral Flow Patterns in the Circle of Willis and the Ophthalmic Artery in Patients With a Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 1913 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |