(Stroke. 1999;30:1190-1195.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Division of Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology (M.T.W., A.D.E., T.K., M.H.) and Department of Neurology (M.G., S.J.), Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Correspondence to Manfred Herrmann, MD, PhD, Division of Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail manfred.herrmann{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsWe investigated 58 patients with completed stroke who were admitted to the stroke unit of the Department of Neurology at Magdeburg University. Serial venous blood samples were taken after admission and during the first 4 days, and protein S-100B and NSE were analyzed by the use of immunoluminometric assays. In all patients, lesion topography and vascular supply were analyzed and volume of infarcted brain areas was calculated. The neurological status was evaluated by a standardized neurological examination and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission, at days 1 and 4 on the stroke unit, at day 10, and at discharge from the hospital. Comprehensive neuropsychological examinations were performed in all patients with first-ever stroke event and supratentorial brain infarctions. Functional outcome was measured with the Barthel score at discharge from the hospital.
ResultsNSE and protein S-100B concentrations were significantly correlated with both volume of infarcted brain areas and NIHSS scores. Patients with an adverse neurological outcome had a significantly higher and significantly longer release of both markers. Neuropsychological impairment was associated with higher protein S-100B release, but this did not reach statistical significance.
ConclusionsSerum concentrations and kinetics of protein S-100B and NSE have a high predictive value for early neurobehavioral outcome after acute stroke. Protein S-100B concentrations at days 2 to 4 after acute stroke may provide valuable information for both neurological status and functional impairment at discharge from the acute care hospital.
Key Words: health status nerve tissue neuron-specific enolase neuropsychology outcome protein S-100 stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relation between release patterns and serum concentrations of protein S-100B and NSE and early neurobehavioral outcome after stroke in a well-characterized group of patients. Our objectives were (1) to analyze the correlation of neurobiochemical markers and volume of infarcted brain areas and (2) to evaluate the association of NSE and protein S-100B with early neurological, neuropsychological, and functional outcome after stroke.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Methods
Neurobiochemical Examinations
Serial venous blood samples were collected at admission
(t0: mean time after stroke onset, 10±9.6 hours;
n=52), and at days 1 (t1: 22±9.4 hours; n=56), 2
(t2: 46±9.6 hours; n=55), 3
(t3: 70±9.9 hours; n=49), and 4
(t4: 94±10.2 hours; n=47) after admission to the
stroke unit. Blood was allowed to clot, and after
centrifugation within 30 minutes (1000g, 10
minutes), serum was stored at 80°C for later analysis.
Serum protein S-100B and NSE were analyzed by the use of
immunoluminometric assays and a fully automated LIA-mat system
(Byk-Sangtec Diagnostica). Sangtec 100
measures the ß-subunit of protein S-100 as defined by 3 monoclonal
antibodies. The detection limit of the kit is 0.02 µg/L, and the
range of protein S-100B serum concentrations of healthy subjects is
reported to be <0.12 µg/L. NSE measurement is based on monoclonal
antibodies that bind to the
-subunit of the enzyme, and the minimal
measurable concentration is <1.0 µg/L.
Neuroradiological Examinations
All neuroradiological examinations were based on cranial CT
scans. All scans were performed in standardized slices without contrast
enhancement soon after admission (mean, 6.9±7.6 hours after
infarction) and were repeated within the first week (mean, 76.6±60.0
hours after infarction). We analyzed the cranial CT data of all
subjects using the public domain NIH Image program (developed at the US
National Institutes of Health and available on the Internet at
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). Lesions were evaluated with
respect to lesion topography (on the basis of Damasio and
Damasio24 and Matsui and Hirano25 ) and
territories of vascular supply (according to Damasio and
Damasio,24 including the territories of the deep
perforators of the carotid system of Ghika et al26 ).
Neuroradiological evaluations were performed independently by 2 members
of our group (M.T.W. and T.K.); 1 of them (T.K.) was blind to all other
data. The mean difference of the calculation of lesion volume between
evaluators was 1.5 mL (SD=9.4 mL), and 95% of all differences of
measurements were within 1 SD. Interrater correlation was calculated
r=0.96 (P<0.001).
Neurological and Neuropsychological Assessments
All subjects underwent a standardized neurological examination
on admission, at days 1 and 4 on the stroke unit, at days 10 to 12 on
the ward, and at discharge from the hospital. The neurological deficit
was quantified by the use of the National Institutes of Health Stroke
Scale (NIHSS).27 We performed comprehensive
neuropsychological examinations in all patients with a first-ever
supratentorial stroke event and without any
clouding of consciousness or severe disorders of attention (n=23). The
neuropsychological examination started with a bedside screening (speech
and language, calculation, visuoperceptive and visuoconstructional
performance, apraxia, memory, executive functions, and
attentional performance) on day 3 after admission. In case of
neuropsychological impairments, a comprehensive and standardized
neuropsychological evaluation was performed 1 week after admission. In
all patients, the functional outcome at discharge was rated with the
Barthel score.
Statistical data evaluation was performed with
nonparametric tests for independent and related samples
(Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Friedman tests). The
threshold for significance was set at P
0.05. In cases of
multiple comparisons, we applied an
-adjustment (Bonferroni
correction) to compensate for type 1 errors, and only P
values <0.01 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figure 1
shows the release patterns of
protein S-100B and NSE. Maximal protein S-100B concentrations were
found on day 2 on the stroke unit (between 55 and 66 hours after stroke
onset). NSE concentrations reached maximal values on the day of
admission (between 7 and 18 hours after stroke onset). After a decrease
from admission to the end of day 1 on the stroke unit (Wilcoxon
signed rank test: z=-1.903, P=0.057), we found a
continuous secondary increase. Volume of lesion and serum
concentrations of both neurobiochemical markers were highly and
significantly correlated (protein S-100B: t0:
r2=0.09, P=0.002;
t1: r2=0.29,
P<0.001; t2:
r2=0.76, P<0.001;
t3: r2=0.81,
P<0.001; t4:
r2=0.78, P<0.001; NSE:
t0: r2=0.15,
P=0.005; t1:
r2=0.10, P=0.021;
t2: r2=0.69,
P<0.001; t3:
r2=0.57, P<0.001;
t4: r2=0.63,
P<0.001). Both absolute concentrations and temporal
patterns of protein S-100B and NSE did not differ significantly with
respect to location or vascular supply of the infarcted brain area.
Cardioembolism as cause of the brain infarction
resulted in significantly higher protein S-100B release compared with
small-artery occlusion or large-artery
atherosclerosis.
|
Neurological, Neuropsychological, and Functional Outcome
NIHSS scores showed a continuous and significant improvement
between admission and discharge (Friedman test:
2=63.1, df=5, P<0.001).
Detailed neuropsychological assessments 1 week after stroke (mean,
7.6±2.1 days) could be performed in 23 patients with first-ever
supratentorial infarctions. Patients with and
without neuropsychological assessments did not differ significantly
with respect to stroke scale scores, volume of lesion, or serum
concentrations of neurobiochemical markers. Fifteen patients (65%)
exhibited severe impairments most marked in attentional
performance, executive functions, and memory
performance (for details, see Table 2
).
|
Patients with cerebellar or brain stem lesions showed a better functional outcome at discharge from the hospital (Barthel score, 92 [±11.6] versus 68.5 [±37.5] in patients with supratentorial infarctions; P=0.08, Mann-Whitney U test).
Interactions Between Release of Neurobiochemical Markers and
Neurological, Neuropsychological, and Functional Outcome
We found high and significant correlations between both
neurobiochemical markers and NIHSS scores. Protein S-100B serum
concentration began to be significantly associated with neurological
status 2 days after the stroke event, and the highest values were found
between NIHSS scores at discharge and protein S-100B values at day 4 on
the stroke unit (r2=0.67,
P<0.001). Figure 2
shows
determination coefficients between both protein S-100B and NSE release
and NIHSS scores at discharge. The graph demonstrates that patients
with an adverse neurological outcome had a significantly higher and
longer release of both markers. The association between release of
neurobiochemical markers and neurological status followed the same
pattern in patients with supratentorial and
infratentorial lesions.
|
Functional outcome (assessed by Barthel score) at discharge from the hospital was significantly correlated with serum concentrations of both neurobiochemical markers 2 to 4 days after admission. Again, the highest correlations were found between late protein S-100B and NSE values and Barthel scores (protein S-100B at day 4: r2 =0.31, P<0.001; NSE at day 4: r2=0.32, P<0.001).
Patients with neuropsychological impairment showed numerically higher
protein S-100B concentrations (Figure 3
).
However, no significant differences between groups could be calculated.
NSE values were comparable in both groups.
|
Multivariate analysis based on a stepwise linear regression model with lesion volume, protein S-100B, and NSE concentrations as independent variables and NIHSS score at discharge as dependent variable showed protein S-100B release as the only variable with a significant predictive value. Protein S-100B serum concentration at day 4 after admission (R2=0.67, ß=0.82, P<0.001) and protein S-100B at day 1 (R2 change=0.09, ß=-0.39, P=0.001) explained 75% of the neurological outcome at discharge.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data show a significant association between NSE and protein S-100B concentrations and both neurological and functional status at discharge from the hospital. This result could be interpreted as an epiphenomenon of the association between volume of lesion and degree of neurological impairment. However, if the correlation between neurobiochemical parameters and neurological outcome was controlled for the volume of lesion, the partial correlation coefficients dropped but remained significant (protein S-100B at day 4: r2=0.24, P=0.001). The majority of previous studies failed to demonstrate a significant correlation between NSE release and outcome after stroke.18 19 20 Büttner and coworkers6 reported a significant correlation between protein S-100B and neurological status at admission. They failed, however, to calculate significant correlations between protein S-100B values and the functional outcome 4 weeks after stroke onset. Significant correlations between initial serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of protein S-100B and clinical and/or functional outcome were reported by Fassbender et al,21 Missler et al,18 and Abraha et al.5 The comparison of different studies that use protein S-100B as a potential predictor of stroke outcome is hampered by 2 major obstacles. First, the authors used different techniques as well as commercially available or self-developed kits, the sensitivity and specificity of which are not comparable. Second, a variety of different scores and scales were applied for the assessment of neurological status or functional outcome after stroke. Some of the measurements (eg, Glasgow Coma Scale or Glasgow Outcome Scale) are hardly appropriate to provide detailed information on neurological or functional outcome after stroke. In the present study we used a newly developed immunoluminometric assay with a lower detection threshold. Furthermore, we applied more detailed assessments of the neurological, neuropsychological, and functional outcome. Both measurements of serum markers and neurobehavioral assessments provide a wider range of data, which may be responsible for the numerically higher and more significant correlations we found between neurobiochemical and neurobehavioral data.
As far as we know, the present study was the first to investigate the release of neurobiochemical markers of brain damage and neuropsychological disorders after stroke. Patients with neuropsychological deficits exhibited numerically higher protein S-100B serum concentrations than patients without neuropsychological impairment. The difference did not reach statistical significance, but we must consider that patients who were not able to perform a standardized neuropsychological assessment were excluded from data analysis. These patients had significantly higher protein S-100B values than patients without neuropsychological deficits and probably will display deficits when neuropsychological assessment can be performed.
Protein S-100B and NSE were both associated with neurological and functional outcome at the time of discharge from the hospital. However, a multivariate comparison of release patterns of both markers based on a linear regression analysis demonstrated that only protein S-100B provides significant information on neurological outcome. The same was true with respect to the comparison of neuropsychologically impaired versus unimpaired patients. Protein S-100B therefore seems to have a higher predictive value than NSE.
The present studies on neurobiochemical markers in stroke patients concentrate on the relation between release patterns and neurobehavioral disorders. Whether the kinetics of protein S-100B release after brain damage may allow insight into brain repair mechanism or plasticity requires further research. To investigate these questions and to analyze the potential value of neurobiochemical markers with respect to subtle long-term neuropsychological deficits, studies with a neuropsychological follow-up examination are needed.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 8, 1999; revision received March 8, 1999; accepted March 18, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Zimmer DB, Cornwall EH, Landar A, Song W. The S100 protein family: history, function, and expression. Brain Res Bull. 1995;37:417429.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Marangos PJ. Neuron specific enolase: a clinically useful marker of neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1987;10:269295.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Barone FC, Clark RK, Price WJ, White RF, Feuerstein GZ, Storer BL, Ohlstein EH. Neuron-specific enolase increases in cerebral and systemic circulation following focal ischemia. Brain Res. 1993;623:7782.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Abraha HD, Butterworth RJ, Bath PMW, Wassif WS, Garthwaite J, Sherwood RA. Serum S-100 protein: relationship to clinical outcome in acute stroke. Ann Clin Biochem. 1997;34:366370.
6.
Büttner T, Weyers S, Postert T, Sprengelmeyer R,
Kuhn W. S-100 protein: serum marker of focal brain damage after
ischemic territorial MCA infarction. Stroke. 1997;28:19611965.
7.
Butterworth RJ, Wassif WS, Sherwood RA, Gerges A,
Poyser KH, Garthwaite J, Peters TJ, Bath PMW. Serum neuron-specific
enolase, carnosinase, and their ratio in acute stroke.
Stroke. 1996;27:20642068.
8. Cunningham RT, Watt M, Winder J, McKinstry S, Lawson JT, Johnston CF, Hawkins SA, Buchanan KD. Serum neurone-specific enolase as an indicator of stroke volume. Eur J Clin Invest. 1996;26:298303.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Hårdemark HG, Ericsson N, Kotwica Z, Rundström G, Mendel-Hartvig I, Olsson Y, Påhlman S, Persson L. S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase in CSF after experimental traumatic or focal ischemic brain damage. J Neurosurg. 1989;71:727731.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Hatfield RH, McKernan RM. CSF neuron-specific enolase as a quantitative marker of neuronal damage in a rat model. Brain Res. 1992;577:249252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Horn M, Seger F, Schlote W. Neuron-specific enolase in
gerbil brain and serum after transient cerebral ischemia.
Stroke. 1995;26:290297.
12. Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Trumpy JH. Management of minor head injury: the value of early computed tomography and serum protein S-100 measurements. J Clin Neurosci. 1997;4:2933.
13. Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Holzschuh M, Metz C, Brawanski A. Comparison of serial S-100 and NSE serum measurements after severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139:11611165.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Herrmann M, Curio N, Jost S, Wunderlich MT, Synowitz H, Wallesch CW. Protein S-100B and neuron specific enolase as early neurobiochemical markers of the severity of traumatic brain injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci.. 1999;14:109114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Aberg T. Signs of brain cell injury during open heart
operations: past and present. Ann Thorac Surg.. 1995;59:13121315.
16. Blomquist S, Johnsson P, Lührs C, Malmkvist G, Solem JO, Alling C, Stahl E. The appearance of S-100 protein in serum during and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a possible marker for cerebral injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:699703.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Rosén H, Rosengren L, Herlitz J, Blomstrand C.
Increased serum levels of the S-100 protein are associated with hypoxic
brain damage after cardiac arrest. Stroke. 1998;29:473477.
18.
Missler U, Wiesmann M, Friedrich C, Kaps M. S-100
protein and neuron-specific enolase concentrations in blood as
indicators of infarction volume and prognosis in acute ischemic
stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:19561960.
19.
Schaarschmidt H, Prange HW, Reiber H. Neuron-specific
enolase concentrations in blood as a prognostic parameter
in cerebrovascular diseases. Stroke. 1994;24:558565.
20. Cunningham RT, Young IS, Winder J, O'Kane MJ, McKinstry S, Johnston CF, Dolan OM, Hawkins SA, Buchanan KD. Serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) levels as an indicator of neuronal damage in patients with cerebral infarction. Eur J Clin Invest. 1991;21:497500.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Fassbender K, Schmidt R, Schreiner A, Fatar M, Mühlhauser F, Daffertshofer M, Hennerici M. Leakage of brain-originated proteins in peripheral blood: temporal profile and diagnostic value in early ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 1997;148:101105.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1999;337:15211526.
23.
Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle J, Biller J, Love BB,
Gordon DL, Marsh EE III, and the TOAST Investigators. Classification of
subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a
multicenter clinical trial. Stroke. 1993;24:3541.
24. Damasio H, Damasio AR. Lesion Analysis in Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1989.
25. Matsui T, Hirano A. An Atlas of the Human Brain for Computerized Tomography. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1978.
26.
Ghika JA, Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Deep perforators
from the carotid system: template of the vascular territories.
Arch Neurol.. 1990;47:10971100.
27.
Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG,
Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M,
Moomaw CJ, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a
clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864870.
28.
Kim JS, Yoon SS, Kim YH, Ryu JS. Serial measurement of
interleukin-6, transforming growth factor-ß, and S-100 protein
in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 1996;27:15531557.
29.
Aurell A, Rosengren LE, Karlsson B, Olsson JE,
Zbornikova V, Haglid KG. Determination of S-100 and glial fibrillary
acidic protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid after brain
infarction. Stroke. 1991;22:12541258.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Gee, A. Kalil, M. Thullbery, and K. J. Becker Induction of Immunologic Tolerance to Myelin Basic Protein Prevents Central Nervous System Autoimmunity and Improves Outcome After Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1575 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Jauch, C. Lindsell, J. Broderick, S. C. Fagan, B. C. Tilley, S. R. Levine, and for the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group Association of Serial Biochemical Markers With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2508 - 2513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Larsson, M. Lipcsey, J. Sjolin, L.-O. Hansson, and M. B. Eriksson Slight Increase of Serum S-100B During Porcine Endotoxemic Shock May Indicate Blood-Brain Barrier Damage Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1465 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Foerch, O. C. Singer, T. Neumann-Haefelin, R. du Mesnil de Rochemont, H. Steinmetz, and M. Sitzer Evaluation of Serum S100B as a Surrogate Marker for Long-term Outcome and Infarct Volume in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction Arch Neurol, July 1, 2005; 62(7): 1130 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Iohom, S. Szarvas, V. Larney, J. O'Brien, E. Buckley, M. Butler, and G. Shorten Perioperative Plasma Concentrations of Stable Nitric Oxide Products Are Predictive of Cognitive Dysfunction After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1245 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Avasarala, J. N. Lycke, C. Malmestrom, S. Haghighi, L. Rosengren, and O. Andersen Neurofilament light protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biological markers in MS Neurology, August 10, 2004; 63(3): 599 - 599. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Stolz, T. Gerriets, A. Kluge, W.-P. Klovekorn, M. Kaps, and G. Bachmann Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Neurobiochemical Markers After Aortic Valve Replacement: Implications for Future Neuroprotective Trials? Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 888 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Schmidt, A. B.L. Tort, O. B. Amaral, A. P. Schmidt, R. Walz, J. Vettorazzi-Stuckzynski, S. H. Martins-Costa, J. G. L. Ramos, D. O. Souza, and L. V.C. Portela Serum S100B in Pregnancy-Related Hypertensive Disorders: A Case-Control Study Clin. Chem., February 1, 2004; 50(2): 435 - 438. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kinoshita, H. Iranami, K. Fujii, A. Yamazaki, M. Shimogai, K. Nakahata, Y. Hironaka, and Y. Hatano The Use of Bone Cement Induces an Increase in Serum Astroglial S-100B Protein in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1657 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Becker, D. Kindrick, R. McCarron, J. Hallenbeck, and R. Winn Adoptive Transfer of Myelin Basic Protein-Tolerized Splenocytes to Naive Animals Reduces Infarct Size: A Role for Lymphocytes in Ischemic Brain Injury? Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1809 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Rainer, L. K.S. Wong, W. Lam, E. Yuen, N. Y.L. Lam, C. Metreweli, and Y.M. D. Lo Prognostic Use of Circulating Plasma Nucleic Acid Concentrations in Patients with Acute Stroke Clin. Chem., April 1, 2003; 49(4): 562 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Oh, J.-G. Lee, S.-J. Na, J.-H. Park, Y.-C. Choi, and W.-J. Kim Prediction of Early Clinical Severity and Extent of Neuronal Damage in Anterior-Circulation Infarction Using the Initial Serum Neuron-Specific Enolase Level Arch Neurol, January 1, 2003; 60(1): 37 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Michetti and D. Gazzolo S100B Protein in Biological Fluids: A Tool for Perinatal Medicine Clin. Chem., December 1, 2002; 48(12): 2097 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-W. Elting, G. A. Sulter, M. Kaste, K. R. Lees, H. C. Diener, M. Hommel, M. Versavel, A. W. Teelken, and J. De Keyser AMPA Antagonist ZK200775 in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Possible Glial Cell Toxicity Detected by Monitoring of S-100B Serum Levels Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2813 - 2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Bokesch, E. Appachi, M. Cavaglia, E. Mossad, and R. B.B. Mee A Glial-Derived Protein, S100B, in Neonates and Infants with Congenital Heart Disease: Evidence for Preexisting Neurologic Injury Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 889 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Petzold, M. J. Eikelenboom, D. Gveric, G. Keir, M. Chapman, R. H. C. Lazeron, M. L. Cuzner, C. H. Polman, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, E. J. Thompson, et al. Markers for different glial cell responses in multiple sclerosis: clinical and pathological correlations Brain, July 1, 2002; 125(7): 1462 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V.C. Portela, A. B.L. Tort, D. V. Schaf, L. Ribeiro, D. B. Nora, R. Walz, L. N. Rotta, C. T. Silva, J. V. Busnello, F. Kapczinski, et al. The Serum S100B Concentration Is Age Dependent Clin. Chem., June 1, 2002; 48(6): 950 - 952. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. C. Portela, J. C. T. Brenol, R. Walz, M. Bianchin, A. B. L. Tort, U. P. Canabarro, S. Beheregaray, J. A. Marasca, R. M. Xavier, E. C. Neto, et al. Serum S100B Levels in Patients with Lupus Erythematosus: Preliminary Observation Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2002; 9(1): 164 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Gartner, W. Lang, F. Leutmetzer, H. Domanovits, W. Waldhausl, and L. Wagner Cerebral Expression and Serum Detectability of Secretagogin, a Recently Cloned EF-hand Ca2+ -binding Protein Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2001; 11(12): 1161 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Suttner, S. N. Piper, K. Lang, I. Huttner, B. Kumle, and J. Boldt Cerebral effects and blood sparing efficiency of sodium nitroprusside-induced hypotension alone and in combination with acute normovolaemic haemodilution Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2001; 87(5): 699 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hara, G. Mies, R. Hata, and K.-A. Hossmann Gene Expressions After Thrombolytic Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Clot Embolism in Mice Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1912 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Bottiger, S. Mobes, R. Glatzer, H. Bauer, A. Gries, P. Bartsch, J. Motsch, and E. Martin Astroglial Protein S-100 Is an Early and Sensitive Marker of Hypoxic Brain Damage and Outcome After Cardiac Arrest in Humans Circulation, June 5, 2001; 103(22): 2694 - 2698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Herrmann, P. Vos, M. T. Wunderlich, C. H. M. M. de Bruijn, and K. J. B. Lamers Release of Glial Tissue-Specific Proteins After Acute Stroke : A Comparative Analysis of Serum Concentrations of Protein S-100B and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2670 - 2677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Herrmann, A. D. Ebert, I. Galazky, M. T. Wunderlich, W. S. Kunz, and C. Huth Neurobehavioral Outcome Prediction After Cardiac Surgery : Role of Neurobiochemical Markers of Damage to Neuronal and Glial Brain Tissue Stroke, March 1, 2000; 31(3): 645 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |