(Stroke. 1999;30:1424-1428.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (H.Y., Y.N.), Brain Pathophysiology (H.F.), and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (S.N., J.K.), Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, and the Research Institute, Shiga Medical Center for Adults (H.Y.), Moriyama, Japan.
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Hiroshi Yamauchi, Research Institute, Shiga Medical Center for Adults, 5-4-30 Moriyama-cho, Moriyama-city, Shiga 524-8524, Japan. E-mail ymuc{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsUsing positron emission tomography in 10 unilateral supratentorial stroke patients, we evaluated regional blood flow, oxygen consumption, and glucose utilization in the cerebellar cortex in the chronic stage. Eight patients with a significant cerebellar blood flow asymmetry, defined as outside the 95% confidence limits predefined in 9 normal subjects, were selected as patients with persistent CCD.
ResultsIn patients with CCD, the cerebellar cortex contralateral to the stroke showed significant decreases in both oxygen consumption and glucose utilization compared with the ipsilateral cerebellar cortex. The decrease in oxygen consumption was less than the decrease in glucose utilization, resulting in a significant increase in the oxygen consumption/glucose utilization ratio.
ConclusionsPersistent CCD caused by stroke may induce uncoupling of oxygen consumption and glucose utilization, which may reflect a characteristic change in brain metabolism caused by deafferentation.
Key Words: cerebellum cerebral metabolism diaschisis tomography, emission computed
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the most consistent signs of transneuronal functional depression is crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD), which was first demonstrated by Baron and coworkers with positron emission tomography (PET) in 1980.6 Some supratentorial strokes cause decreases in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism in the contralateral cerebellum.1 2 7 The mechanism responsible for this phenomenon appears to be deafferentation through the cortico-ponto-cerebellar tract.1 2 6 In contrast to conventional diaschisis, which is a transient response, some patients show persistent CCD.8 In these cases, certain processes occurring after deafferentation would change the metabolism in the cerebellum over time. Our previous study9 showed that in persistent CCD the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) decreases less than the CBF, and the oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) increases slightly. The uncoupling of the CMRO2 and the CBF might reflect a characteristic change in brain metabolism caused by deafferentation. However, the mechanism of the uncoupling was unclear. A recent study in infarcted human brain has demonstrated delayed induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in brain areas distant from the infarct, suggesting that oxidation of arachidonic acid may be involved in remodeling of the surviving neural networks.10 The uncoupling of the CMRO2 and the CBF in persistent CCD may be related to the oxidation of some substrates other than blood-borne glucose which could also lead to the uncoupling of the CMRO2 and the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc).
To investigate whether oxygen consumption is uncoupled from glucose utilization in persistent CCD, we measured both the CMRO2 and CMRglc by using PET in patients with a unilateral supratentorial stroke and CCD in the chronic stage, and analyzed the changes in the calculated CMRO2/CMRglc ratio in the cerebellar cortex contralateral to the stroke.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Positron Emission Tomography
The patient was allowed a light breakfast 6 hours before the PET
study. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient under
the guidance of the Ethics Committee of the Kyoto University Faculty of
Medicine. The PCT-3600W system (Hitachi Medical Co) was used for
PET scanning.11 This system acquires 15 slices with
center-to-center distance of 7 mm and transaxial resolution of
6.5 mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) at the center. The slice
thickness at the center was 6.9 mm FWHM and 5.9 mm FWHM, for
in-plane and cross-plane slices, respectively.
The subject's head was immobilized with a head-holder and positioned with light beams to obtain transaxial slices parallel to the orbitomeatal line. As part of the scanning procedure but before the PET study, germanium-68gallium-68 transmission scanning was performed for 20 minutes for attenuation correction. For the 15O-gas study, C15O2 and 15O2 were inhaled continuously at 300 MBq and 500 MBq per minute, respectively. The scan time was 5 minutes, and arterial blood was sampled 3 times during each scan. We calculated CBF, CMRO2, and OEF based on the steady-state method.12 Inhalation of 1.20 GBq of C15O was used to measure CBV, and CMRO2 and OEF were corrected with respect to the CBV.13 After the completion of the 15O-gas study, the subject was intravenously infused with 166 to 281 MBq (4.5 to 7.6 mCi) of 18F-labeled 2-deoxyglucose (FDG). Arterial blood samples were withdrawn at 18 times: just before, at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 seconds after, and at 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after FDG injection. The PET scan was started 40 minutes after FDG injection, and emission data were collected for 20 minutes. The CMRglc was calculated by Phelps' autoradiographic method,14 using fixed values of K1*=0.102, k2*=0.130, k3*=0.062, and k4*=0.0068 for the rate constants and 0.52 for the lumped constant.15 Functional images were reconstructed as 128x128 pixels, with each pixel representing an area 2.0x2.0 mm.
We analyzed images in the tomographic plane corresponding to the level of the cerebellum. We used the scan slice that most satisfactorily depicted the cerebellar hemisphere. First, in the CBF image, we placed 3 circular regions of interest, 16 mm in diameter, over the gray matter of the cerebellar hemisphere ipsilateral to the supratentorial lesion. These regions of interest were then copied over the contralateral side with respect to the anteroposterior axis, which was determined with respect to the interhemispheric line in the upper slice of the CBF image. We took care not to include the sinus in the regions of interest by comparison with the CBV image.9
From the absolute CBF, CMRO2, OEF, CBV, and
CMRglc values, we calculated the percentage
difference between contralateral (CL) and ipsilateral (IL) cerebellar
cortex (
%) as
%=(CL-IL)/ILx100. We assumed that the values in
the ipsilateral cerebellar cortex are not affected in CCD and that the
resulting values reflected the percent differences caused by CCD. We
also studied 9 normal subjects of similar age (mean age, 58±7 years)
using the 15O-gas steady-state method, and
calculated the asymmetry index (AI) between the right (R) and left (L)
cerebellar cortex as AI-L (%)=(R-L)/Lx100 and AI-R
(%)=(L-R)/Rx100. AI-L and AI-R for CBF in the normal subjects
(mean±SD) were -0.11±3.60% and 0.36±3.49%, respectively. The
patients with significant cerebellar CBF asymmetry (ie, with an
individual value of
% <-8.41% for a left
supratentorial stroke or <-7.68% for a right
supratentorial stroke, which is the lower 95%
confidence limit as defined in normal subjects) were selected.
Statistical Analysis
We compared the results in each cerebellar cortex using
Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Differences with
P<0.05 (2-tailed) were considered significant. Spearman
rank correlation was used to analyze the relationships among
the metabolic measures, lesion size, and the duration of
time elapsed since the insult. Differences were considered significant
at P<0.05 (2-tailed).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The percent difference of the CBF between the ipsilateral and
contralateral cerebellar cortices was significantly correlated with the
percent difference of the CMRglc (
=0.76,
P<0.05), with the percent difference of the
CMRO2 (
=0.90, P<0.05) and with the
percent difference of the CBV (
=0.81, P<0.05).
The increase in the
CMRO2/CMRglc ratio was
present in all individual patients, but the percent difference of
the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio had
a tendency to decrease with time elapsed since the insult (
=-0.69,
P=0.067). The percent difference of the
CMRO2/CMRglc ratio was not
correlated with lesion size.
The Figure
shows the images of the
cerebellar blood flow and metabolism in a patient with a
left putaminal hemorrhage. An increase in the
CMRO2/CMRglc ratio was
found in the cerebellar cortex contralateral to the hemorrhage.
Among the 8 patients, this patient was studied at the earliest time
since the stroke (4 months) and showed the most prominent hemispheric
difference of the
CMRO2/CMRglc ratio.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The increase in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio in persistent CCD may be a time-dependent process that occurs in the subacute or chronic stage after stroke. We have no acute versus chronic longitudinal data from the same patients. However, an earlier study of the relationship between the CMRO2 and CMRglc in patients with CCD due to acute stroke showed no difference between the decrease in the CMRO2 and CMRglc.7 Thus, the increase in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio in persistent CCD may not be explained by the simple decrease in physiological neural input that may occur in CCD in the acute stage, although an increase in physiological neural activity in the normal brain may be associated with an increase in the CMRglc/CMRO2 ratio.16 The decrease in the CBF was correlated with that in the CMRglc, suggesting that the decrease in CBF may result from the decrease in glucose demand. Thus, the CMRO2 may have been increased on the top of the normal metabolic loss after a decrease in physiological neural input. The increase in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio had a tendency to decrease with time elapsed since the insult, suggesting that the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio increases in the relatively early phase after deafferentation and then returns to normal gradually. Therefore, the increase in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio might be related to certain processes occurring after deafferentation, which may include transneuronal degeneration of postsynaptic neurons or some adaptive responses for neuronal survival and synaptic reorganization.17 18
At present, we have no convincing explanation of the mechanism of the increase in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio in persistent CCD. One possibility is that oxygen is being used to metabolize energy-producing moieties other than glucose (eg, glycogen stores, ketone bodies, amino acids, and lipids). However, supplemental energy production from other substrates may not be needed, because the blood supply of glucose is not primarily disturbed in persistent CCD and the energy production via oxidative metabolism of glucose may be matched to demand. In addition, oxygen metabolism for energy production may not induce the uncoupling of CMRO2 and CBF. Another possibility is that oxygen is being used to oxidize some substrates for purposes other than energy production. One possible candidate of the substrate may be arachidonic acid. In the infarcted human brain, delayed induction of COX-2 (the inducible form of cyclooxygenase) in remote brain areas has been demonstrated.10 COX-2 is the rate-limiting enzyme in prostanoid synthesis, and it mediates the formation of prostaglandin G2 from 1 molecule of arachidonic acid and 2 molecules of oxygen.19 Its expression is regulated by physiological synaptic activity or growth factors, suggesting a role for COX-2 and its prostanoid products in neuronal plasticity or survival.19 20 Therefore, activation of arachidonic acid metabolic pathways, including an induction of COX-2, may increase the oxygen consumption uncoupled from glucose use in relation to transneuronal degeneration of postsynaptic neurons or remodeling of the surviving neural networks.
The major problems of the 15O steady-state method are the underestimation of CBF and CMRO2,21 which might lead to a low CMRO2 and a low CMRO2/CMRglc ratio in our patients, as previously discussed:22 the ipsilateral cerebellar CMRO2 and CMRO2/CMRglc ratio were 109.4 µmol/100 g/min and 4.42, whereas the expected value from the literature would be in the region of 150 µmol/100 g/min and 5 to 6, respectively. Although this method may also underestimate the hemispheric differences of both the CBF and CMRO2, the degree of the effect is the same for both the CBF and CMRO2, with no effect on the hemispheric difference of OEF. In addition, the degree of the hemispheric difference of the CBF was similar to that of the CMRglc in this study. Thus, the increases in the OEF and in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio may not result from measurement errors of CBF and CMRO2. The measurement of the CMRglc by Phelps' autoradiographic method is affected if changes in the rate constants and lumped constant values occur in persistent CCD.23 In our preliminary analysis of the rate constants24 in persistent CCD in some patients included in this study, the cerebellar CMRglc values obtained by the kinetic method had a tendency to be lower than those obtained by the autoradiographic method, which might lead to a further increase in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio (data not shown).
In conclusion, persistent CCD induces uncoupling of oxygen consumption and glucose utilization. The CMRO2 is decreased less than the CMRglc, which results in the increased CMRO2/CMRglc ratio. The increase in the CMRO2/CMRglc ratio may indicate the occurrence of some qualitative changes in brain metabolism in response to deafferentation. Further investigation is needed to clarify the cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of deafferentation and their relationship to neuronal death and anatomic reorganization.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 27, 1999; revision received April 20, 1999; accepted April 20, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ihara, H. Tomimoto, K. Ishizu, T. Mukai, H. Yoshida, N. Sawamoto, M. Inoue, T. Doi, K. Hashikawa, J. Konishi, et al. Decrease in Cortical Benzodiazepine Receptors in Symptomatic Patients With Leukoaraiosis: A Positron Emission Tomography Study Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 942 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gold and M. Lauritzen Neuronal deactivation explains decreased cerebellar blood flow in response to focal cerebral ischemia or suppressed neocortical function PNAS, May 28, 2002; 99(11): 7699 - 7704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |