(Stroke. 1999;30:1429-1431.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (H.Y.), Brain Pathophysiology (H.F., Y.N.), and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (H.O., J.K.), Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, and the Research Institute, Shiga Medical Center for Adults, Moriyama (H.Y., H.O.), Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsWe used positron emission tomography to study 7 patients with a unilateral supratentorial infarct and CCD. The distributions of CRCV and CPV were assessed by using 15O-labeled carbon monoxide and 62Cu-labeled human serum albumindithiosemicarbazone tracers, respectively. The CRCV, CPV, and calculated hematocrit values were compared between the cerebellar hemispheres.
ResultsIn the cerebellar cortex contralateral to the supratentorial infarct, the values of CRCV, CPV, and total CBV were significantly decreased compared with those in the ipsilateral cerebellar cortex. The CRCV was decreased to a greater degree than the CPV, and the value of the hematocrit was decreased in the contralateral cerebellar cortex.
ConclusionsCCD may decrease the total CBV, which may reflect vasoconstriction caused by decreased metabolism due to deafferentation. In addition, the more pronounced decrease in CRCV than in CPV may result in a decrease in hematocrit in CCD.
Key Words: cerebellum cerebral blood volume diaschisis hematocrit
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Deafferentation can be shown as decreases in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism in the target regions without gross morphological changes.1 A decrease in metabolism caused by deafferentation may result in vasoconstriction, which may be reflected by a decrease in the cerebral blood volume (CBV). However, a decrease in the CBV in the regions that have undergone deafferentation has been demonstrated by only a few studies in patients with stroke. Furthermore, in the previous studies, the total CBV (TCBV) was estimated from the cerebral red blood cell volume (CRCV) without knowledge of the changes in the cerebral plasma volume (CPV).2 3 Cerebral microcirculation may be physiologically regulated to adapt to altered neuronal function, circulating conditions, and pathological states, in which red blood cell (RBC) and plasma flow may change differently.4 In the conditions with vasoconstriction and low flow rate, a "tube" Fahraeus effect plus a "network" Fahraeus effect may result in a decrease in hematocrit.5 Therefore, vasoconstriction caused by metabolic decline due to deafferentation would cause a decrease in hematocrit as well as TCBV.
One example of a pure form of deafferentation is crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD), which was first demonstrated by Baron and coworkers6 with positron emission tomography (PET). Some supratentorial brain lesions cause a decrease in the CBF and metabolism in the contralateral cerebellum without morphological change. The main mechanism responsible for this phenomenon appears to be deafferentation through the corticopontocerebellar tract.1 6 A previous study showed a decrease in the CRCV in CCD.3 In this study, to further analyze the hemodynamic changes in CCD, we measured the CPV as well as CRCV by using PET, and we calculated hematocrit.7 8 The purpose of this study was to investigate whether CCD decreases the total CBV (CRCV plus CPV) and, if so, whether CCD differentially affects the CRCV and CPV, resulting in a change in hematocrit.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients were scanned with the use of a commercially available PET system (PCT-3600W, Hitachi Medical Co).9 This system simultaneously acquires 15 slices with a center-to-center distance of 7 mm. All scans were obtained at resolution of 7.5 mm full width at half maximum in the transaxial direction and of 6.5 mm in the axial direction in the wobbling mode. Patients were positioned with the orbitomeatal line parallel to the detector rings.
After a transmission scan, the CBF was determined while the subject
continuously inhaled 300 MBq of CO15O per minute
through a mask, and the CMRO2 and OEF were
measured during continuous inhalation of 500 MBq of
O15O per minute. Data were collected for 5
minutes. For measurement of the CRCV, 1.20 GBq of
C15O was inhaled, and the PET scanning was
started
30 seconds after the appearance of a peak count of the brain
tissue adequate for data collection and continued for 3 minutes. We
calculated CBF, CMRO2, and OEF on the basis of
the steady state method.10 The CBV was calculated from the
data of the C15O scan and was incorporated in the
correction of the CMRO2 and
OEF.11 12 In the calculation of the CBV, a conventional
hematocrit ratio of 0.85 was used. Functional images were reconstructed
with 128x128 pixels, with each pixel representing an area
of 2.0x2.0 mm2.
After the completion of the 15O gas study, 296 to 740 MBq of 62Cu-labeled human serum albumindithiosemicarbazone (62Cu-HSA-DTS) was injected intravenously over 15 seconds in a total volume of 8 mL to obtain CPV images.13 PET data acquisition was started 3 minutes after administration of 62Cu-HSA-DTS and continued for 8 minutes. Blood samples were obtained at 1, 5, and 7 minutes after injection of 62Cu-HSA-DTS, and both whole blood radioactivity and plasma radioactivity were counted.8 Regional CRCV and CPV were calculated with the use of the PET images acquired in the C15O and 62Cu-HSA-DTS studies according to the following equations: CRCV=Cco/(Aco/AHct) (mL/g) and CPV=CHSA/PHSA (mL/g), where Cco and CHSA are the cerebral tissue radioactivities of C15O and of 62Cu-HSA-DTS, respectively, Aco is the whole blood radioactivity of C15O, PHSA is the plasma count of 62Cu-HSA-DTS, and AHct is the large-vessel arterial hematocrit measured in the blood sampled from the radial artery. The regional cerebral hematocrit (CHct) was calculated from the CRCV and CPV for each patient as CHct=CRCV/TCBV, with TCBV=CRCV+CPV. We also calculated the mean transit times of blood (Tb), RBCs (Tr), and plasma (Tp), defined as follows: Tb=TCBV/CBF, Tr=Tbx(CHct/AHct), and Tp=Tbx(1-CHct/1-AHct), respectively.5
We analyzed images in the tomographic plane corresponding to the level of the cerebellum. We used the scan slice that most satisfactorily visualized the cerebellar hemisphere. First, in the CBF image, we placed 3 circular regions of interest 16 mm in diameter over the gray matter of the cerebellar hemisphere ipsilateral to the supratentorial lesion. These regions of interest were then copied over the contralateral side with respect to the anteroposterior axis, which was determined with reference to the interhemispheric line in the upper slice of the CBF image. We took care not to include the sinus in the regions of interest by comparison with the CRCV and CPV images.3
From the absolute values of the PET variables, we calculated the
percent difference between contralateral (CL) and ipsilateral (IL)
cerebellar cortex (
%) as
%=(CL-IL)/ILx100. We assumed that
the resulting values reflected the percent changes caused by CCD. We
also studied 9 normal subjects with similar ages (mean age, 56±16
years) using the 15O gas steady state method, and
we calculated the asymmetry index (AI) between the right (R) and left
(L) cerebellar cortex as AI (absolute % value)=||R-L||/(R+L)x200,
where ||R- L|| represents the absolute value of the
difference. Mean±SD AI in the normal subjects was 3.61±1.76% for
CBF. The patients with significant cerebellar CBF asymmetry (ie, an
individual value of the
% that was greater than the 7.67%
that covers the upper 95% confidence limit as defined in normal
subjects) were selected.
We compared the results, except for CBF, in each cerebellar cortex using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze the relationship between the CBF and TCBV. A P value of <0.05 was regarded as indicating statistical significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the cerebellar cortex contralateral to the
supratentorial infarct, the values of CRCV, CPV,
and TCBV were significantly decreased compared with those in the
cerebellar cortex ipsilateral to the supratentorial
infarct (Table
). In the contralateral
cerebellar cortex, the value of TCBV was significantly correlated with
the value of CBF (
=0.94, P<0.05). The CRCV was decreased
to a greater degree than the CPV, and the value of hematocrit was
decreased in the contralateral cerebellar cortex. The calculated mean
transit time of RBCs was significantly decreased, whereas the mean
transit times of blood and plasma and showed no significant
differences.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The metabolic suppression resulting from deafferentation may cause vasoconstriction, leading to a decrease in the TCBV. One earlier PET study showed that in 4 patients with subcortical stroke, the CBV measured with C15O (CRCV) was reduced in proportion to the reduction in CBF and CMRO2 in the cerebral cortical regions with metabolic depression due to deafferentation, which was defined as having a decrease in the CMRO2 with normal OEF, supporting this hypothesis.2 However, in those patients, the possibility that reduced CMRO2 in the normal-appearing cortical areas may have resulted partly from neuronal loss could not be completely excluded.14 In this study we showed that the TCBV was decreased in CCD. CCD is one of the purest models of deafferentation because the cerebellum is anatomically distant from, and has a different arterial supply from, the area damaged by the supratentorial stroke, thus reducing potentially confounding issues. Therefore, our results confirm the decrease in the TCBV in the region with metabolic depression caused by deafferentation.
The change in CBV may be important to differentiate the reduction in CBF caused by deafferentation from that caused by ischemia in morphologically normal brain areas. The decrease in the CBV in the region that underwent deafferentation with vasoconstriction contrasts with the increase in the CBV in the ischemic region, where decreased perfusion pressure causes vasodilatation.15 16 Ischemia may induce a more pronounced increase in CPV than in CRCV,17 whereas deafferentation may induce a more pronounced decrease in CRCV than in CPV, as shown in this study in CCD. The different changes in CRCV and CPV may reflect physiological regulatory mechanisms for adapting to decreased neuronal function or decreased perfusion pressure.4
The reason for the decrease in hematocrit in CCD is unclear. We speculate that a tube Fahraeus effect plus a network Fahraeus effect may result in a decrease in hematocrit in the region with vasoconstriction and decreased CBF.5 In artificial tubes with diameters of <500 µm, the hematocrit decreases with decreasing diameter (a tube Fahraeus effect). Therefore, vasoconstriction caused by metabolic decline due to deafferentation may have resulted in the decrease in hematocrit. The transit time of RBCs was decreased in CCD in this study. A greater increase in the velocity of RBCs than in that of plasma may result in concentration of RBCs in the centers of vessels with an increase in the marginal cell-free plasma layer. In addition, an irregular distribution of RBCs in arterial bifurcation may contribute to the decrease in hematocrit. Direct correlation between the blood flow rate and hematocrit in arterial branches has been demonstrated.18 Gradual separation of RBCs and plasma in the arterial branching sequence may lead to a decrease of RBC concentration in the regions that underwent deafferentation with a decreased CBF (a network Fahraeus effect).
In conclusion, CCD may decrease the TCBV (CRCV plus CPV), which may reflect vasoconstriction caused by decreased metabolism. In addition, the more pronounced decrease in CRCV than in CPV may result in a decrease in hematocrit in CCD.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 18, 1999; revision received April 13, 1999; accepted April 13, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |