(Stroke. 1999;30:1814-1818.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Clinical Neurosciences (Z.K., E.Y., H.S.M.) and Medicine (P.M.W.B.), Guy's, King's, and St Thomas' Hospital School of Medicine and the Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Hugh Markus, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. E-mail h.markus{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsWe recruited 119 patients with acute anterior circulation infarction within 72 hours of stroke onset. Transcranial Doppler recordings were possible in 100 (84.0%). Bilateral 1-hour middle cerebral artery (MCA) recordings were made and saved on digital audiotape for blinded offline analysis. When embolic signals were detected during screening of the first recording, simultaneous recording was performed from the ipsilateral MCA and common carotid artery for an additional 30 minutes. In all patients with embolic signals at screening and in matched negative controls, recordings were repeated on days 4, 7, and 14.
ResultsEmbolic signals were detected in the symptomatic MCA in 16 patients (16%). They were more common in patients with carotid stenosis (P<0.0001), occurring in 50% of this group. They were rare in patients with cardioembolic stroke (4.5%) and were not detected in patients with lacunar stroke. In the 16 patients with embolic signals, the proportion with embolic signals fell over time (P=0.0025), but they were still present in a third at 2 weeks. In 10 patients, localization of the embolic source was possible by simultaneous recording from the MCA and the ipsilateral common carotid artery.
ConclusionsContinued asymptomatic embolization is common after stroke in patients with carotid artery disease and is still present in a significant proportion at 2 weeks. The technique may identify patients at risk of further stroke for more aggressive antiplatelet therapy; this needs to be tested in large prospective studies. The technique may also allow localization of the active embolic source.
Key Words: cerebral embolism stroke ultrasonography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have detected ES in patients with acute stoke, but there have been few prospective studies, and even fewer in which localization of the embolic source or determination of the natural history of asymptomatic embolization has been performed. In this study we prospectively recruited consecutive patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke. We determined the prevalence of asymptomatic embolization in different stroke subtypes. We assessed the practicability of localization of the embolic source by simultaneously performing recordings at multiple points along the arterial tree. In patients who were ES positive on initial recording and in a matched sample of ES-negative patients, we determined the natural history of asymptomatic embolization over the first 2 weeks after stroke onset.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients were evaluated with clinical history, neurological
examination, cerebral CT and/or MRI,
electrocardiography, and carotid duplex
ultrasound. Transthoracic
echocardiography was performed in 57 cases, and 5
cases had transesophageal
echocardiography. The degree of carotid
stenosis was estimated from a combination of the ratio of
internal to common carotid artery peak systolic velocity and
the B-mode and color flow image.6 With this information,
strokes were classified into the following etiologic categories: (1)
carotid artery:
50% stenosis in the symptomatic
internal carotid artery territory; (2) cardioembolic: a potential
cardiac source on electrocardiography or
echocardiography; (3) lacunar: a typical clinical
lacunar syndrome7 with an appropriate lacunar infarct or a
normal CT or MRI brain scan; (4) coexistent causes: >1 of
the above potential causes; and (5) unknown.
All patients were followed up prospectively for the first month to identify recurrent events. In all such cases, repeated neuroimaging was performed.
TCD Recordings
TCD was performed with the use of a Pioneer TC4040 (Nicolet-EME
Ltd) with a multidepth 2-MHz transducer. A sample volume of 5 mm
and a sweep speed of 5 seconds were used for all patients. A 128-point
fast Fourier transform was used for spectral analysis. Fast
Fourier transform time-window overlap was >66%. The subject was
placed in a sitting or supine position, the middle cerebral artery
(MCA) was identified via the transtemporal window, and a
transducer was fixed in position with the use of a standard headset. In
all subjects, bilateral recordings were performed for 1 hour.
Mean±SD depths of insonation of the symptomatic MCA were
52.6±3.4 and 56.2±3.2 mm and of the asymptomatic MCA
were 52.2±3.1 and 55.9±3.1 mm.
During all recordings, the spectral display and audio signal was monitored online by an experienced observer wearing headphones, to identify patients in whom ES were occurring. All 15 patients identified as being ES positive at this stage were enrolled in a follow-up study with recordings repeated on days 4, 7, and 14 after stroke. An equal number of controls (the next patient after each ES-positive patient) were enrolled in the same follow-up protocol. In all 30 patients entering this follow-up study, antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants were not administered until after the day 7 TCD examination.
In all 15 patients identified as ES positive at the time of the first recording, localization of the embolic source was attempted. An additional 30-minute recording was performed simultaneously from the symptomatic MCA and the ipsilateral common carotid artery (CCA). The same 2 MHz was used for the CCA recordings; this was held in place with the use of a specially constructed support with the transducer mounted in an ultrasound gel block (Urethane Rubber, ATS Laboratories) to offset the probe from the skin and allow insonation at an optimal depth. Mean±SD depth of insonation for the 2 gates for CCA recordings was 35.2±2.8 and 37.2±1.9 mm. Beam plots for the 2-MHz probe demonstrated that the beam adequately covered the CCA.
For all recordings, the audio Doppler signal was stored on digital audiotape with the use of a TASCAM DA-88 recorder (Teac Ltd). Analysis of recordings was performed offline by an observer (observer 1) who was blinded to the clinical details, time of recording, and subject group. An ES was identified as a predominantly unidirectional short-duration intensity increase, accompanied by a characteristic clicking or chirping sound.8 The results presented in the report are based on this offline analysis rather than the online analysis described above. The online analysis was performed merely to identify ES-positive patients for the follow-up and localization arms of the study. A threshold of >7 decibels was used because this has been shown to increase interobserver agreement without excessive loss of sensitivity.9 Intensity was determined from the color-coded intensity scale on the spectral display. The peak intensity of the ES and the intensity of the background spectra at the same frequency and part of the cardiac cycle, from the preceding or subsequent cardiac cycle, were determined. All possible ES detected were saved and then reviewed by a second experienced observer (observer 2); if both observers agreed that the signal was an ES, it was then included in subsequent analysis. Interobserver reproducibility in identifying ES was assessed by the 2 observers independently analyzing a separate recording that was 105 minutes long and had been prepared from MCA recordings from 6 patients with carotid stenosis. Agreement was calculated with the use of the proportion of specific agreement, which estimates the probability that 1 observer will identify a specific ES if another observer has identified it, with a probability of 1 indicating complete agreement.10 Observer 1 detected 90 ES, and the agreement of observer 1 with observer 2 was 0.92. Observer 2 detected 89 ES, and the agreement of observer 1 was 0.90.
Data Analysis
The rate of embolization was expressed as the number of ES per
hour of recording from each MCA, ie, a patient with a
successful bilateral recording for 1 hour had 2 hours of
successful recording. The difference in the proportion of
patients with ES compared with ES-negative patients was determined by
2 tests. The association between the presence
of ES and clinical characteristics was determined by
2 tests (with Yates correction when
appropriate) or t tests as indicated. Continuous
variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test.
All statistical analysis was performed with SPSS statistical
software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When we analyzed the first recording from the symptomatic side, the proportion of patients in whom ES were detected increased from 10 (10%) after 15 minutes, to 12 (12%) after 30 minutes, to 16 (16%) after 45 minutes. There was no further increase in the number of ES-positive patients during the last 15 minutes of the recording.
Correlation With Stroke Subtype
The correlation between ES and stroke subtype is shown in Table 1
. ES were significantly more common in
patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion compared with the
other stroke subtype groups (P<0.0001), occurring in 50%
of carotid patients. Eight patients had symptomatic carotid
occlusion; 2 of these had coexistent potential cardiac
embolic sources. Of the 6 with no other potential source, in 3
(33%) ES were detected in the ipsilateral MCA. All of these had
contralateral carotid stenosis of >50%. ES were not detected
in patients with lacunar stroke. Twenty-two patients were classified as
cardioembolic stroke since they had only a potential cardioembolic
source (atrial fibrillation in 19, poor left ventricular
function and/or akinetic left ventricular wall segment in
3). In this group ES were infrequent, occurring in only 4.5%.
|
Natural History of Asymptomatic Embolization
Fifteen ES-positive patients and 15 ES-negative controls were
enrolled in the natural history study, as described in Methods. The
proportion of patients remaining ES positive is shown in Table 2
. In the ES-positive group, 1 patient
died between each recording, and therefore recordings
were performed in 14, 13, and 12 subjects at the 3 follow-up time
points. Although the proportion of ES-positive patients fell over time
(P=0.0025), half of patients were still ES positive at 1
week, and ES were still present in a third at 2 weeks. ES were not
detected during the follow-up recordings in any of the
ES-negative controls.
|
Localization of Embolic Source
Localization of the embolic source was attempted in 2 ways. First,
we determined whether ES were detected in 1 or both MCAs. In all 16
ES-positive patients, ES were detected in the symptomatic
MCA. In addition, in 3 patients ES were detected in the contralateral
MCA, suggesting a cardiac or aortic arch source. One of these patients
had 2 potential embolic sources, both atrial fibrillation and carotid
stenosis on the symptomatic side; in this patient
further localization demonstrated signals appearing consecutively in
ipsilateral CCA and MCA, suggesting that the source of emboli was
proximal to the CCA. Bilateral ES were detected in an additional 2
patients, both with unknown stroke subtype.
Second, in the 15 patients in whom ES were identified at the time of initial recording, an additional 30-minute recording was attempted as we insonated the symptomatic MCA and the ipsilateral CCA simultaneously. Three of 15 ES-positive patients could not tolerate this additional recording because of restlessness, which made it impossible to keep the CCA transducer stationary. During this 30-minute period, additional ES were detected in 10 of the 12 patients. In 8 patients, ES were detected in the MCA only, suggesting a carotid source of emboli; all patients had ipsilateral carotid stenosis on duplex ultrasound. One of these patients also had a potential cardioembolic source (poor left ventricular function and a region of left ventricular wall hypokinesia). In 2 patients ES were detected in both the MCA and CCA; 1 patient had atrial fibrillation and no carotid disease, while the other, who had atrial fibrillation and carotid stenosis, also had bilateral MCA signals, as described in the preceding paragraph.
Follow-Up
All patients were followed up prospectively for the first month to
identify recurrent events. Six of the 100 patients died within 4 weeks
after stroke; 5 had no clear evidence of recurrence in a
different territory, while 1 had a recurrent stroke in a different
vascular territory. The only patient who suffered an additional stroke
suffered a recurrent stroke in the contralateral carotid territory;
this patient had bilateral ES on the initial recording. Death
and/or recurrent stroke occurred in a significantly higher proportion
of patients in whom ES were detected on the first recording: 4
of 16 (25%) compared with 12 of 84 (14.3%) (P=0.026). In
addition, 2 patients suffered an additional transient ischemic
attack, both in the same territory as the presenting event; both
were of the lacunar subtype and were ES negative.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a significant proportion of patients, localization of the embolic source was possible by recording from both MCAs and also by simultaneously recording from the symptomatic MCA and CCA. In 3 subjects the ES were bilateral, suggesting a cardiac or aortic arch source. In 2 of these no cause of stroke had been found, but neither underwent transesophageal echocardiography. This information could be used to identify individuals for further detailed echocardiographic evaluation. The third patient with bilateral ES had 2 potential sources of embolism, a carotid stenosis and atrial fibrillation. The bilateral ES suggest that the latter was the relevant source. This information may be clinically important; the patient might be treated better with anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation rather than urgent carotid endarterectomy. In the same patient, the importance of the atrial fibrillation rather than the carotid stenosis is supported by the detection of ES passing through the CCA and then the ipsilateral MCA when simultaneous recordings were made. In an additional 9 patients, simultaneous recording from the MCA and CCA allowed localization of the embolic source.
Previous studies have reported a prevalence of ES in acute stroke varying from 9.3% to 17.1%. These studies have usually used recording times of 20 to 30 minutes. Earlier studies used online analysis detection of ES, which may be subject to observer bias,12 or the use of currently commercially available automated ES detection software,13 which has been shown to lack specificity.14 In studies in which blinded offline analysis of ES by an experienced observer has been used, ES prevalences of 9%, 19%, 24%, and 40% have been reported.15 16 17 These are consistent with our results. The lowest figure of 9% was found with a time window of 4 weeks from acute stroke,16 and our results demonstrate that ES frequency declines in the first 2 weeks. Our results also demonstrate the effect of prolonging the recording time on the prevalence of ES; this value would have increased from 12% to 16% by recording for 45 rather than 30 minutes. The high frequency of ES in patients with carotid stenosis has been recently reported in acute stroke,15 and the ES frequency correlates well with that in other studies of patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis.18 19 Consistent with the recent results of Koennecke et al,15 we found a low frequency of ES in patients with cardioembolic stroke. This suggests that the pattern of embolization may be different in these patients, perhaps with fewer larger emboli.
There is little information about the natural history of asymptomatic embolization in acute stroke. Sliwka et al17 recorded for 30 minutes at admission and then again 24 and 48 hours later and reported a slight increase in the prevalence of ES on the second recordings, but these time points were narrowly spaced. In patients with carotid artery stenosis, it has been demonstrated that ES are most frequent soon after symptoms.20 Our results demonstrate that the rate of embolization does decline over the first 2 weeks, but in many patients persistent embolization is still occurring at the end of the second week. These patients may be suitable for more aggressive antithromboembolic therapy.
There is increasing evidence that asymptomatic ES in patients with acute cerebral ischemic do identify a subgroup of patients at high risk of further events. A retrospective series of 229 patients examined in a neurovascular laboratory found that ES predicted recurrent ischemic events,21 while a smaller study of acute stroke reported similar findings.22 In our study only 1 patient had recurrent stroke, in a different vascular territory. This patient had bilateral ES on the initial recording. Five patients died, and of these, 3 had ES at presentation. Overall, patients who were ES positive on the first recording had a significantly higher risk of early death or recurrent stroke, but the number of end points was small. It is possible that continuing embolization is merely associated with a worse stroke, but it is also possible that continued ES results in extension of infarction within the initial peri-infarct region. In patients with severe stroke, particularly in a patient in which the embolic source is in 1 carotid artery and therefore recurrence in a different vascular territory is unlikely, this might result in a worsening of neurological status without clear new neurological signs and an increase in mortality. However, the number of strokes and death in our study was very small, making firm conclusions difficult to draw. The risk of early recurrent ischemic stroke is approximately 2% to 4%, and therefore larger studies are required to unequivocally determine whether ES predict stroke risk in this group of patients.
In summary, our results demonstrate that the prevalence of asymptomatic embolization in patients with acute stroke varies markedly among different stroke subtypes, that the technique may provide useful clinical information by identifying and localizing the relevant embolic source, and that continued embolization may be associated with a worse prognosis. Further studies are required to confirm the predictive value of asymptomatic ES and to determine whether they identify a group of patients who may particularly benefit from more aggressive antithromboembolic therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 2, 1999; revision received May 11, 1999; accepted June 2, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Russell D, Madden KP, Clark WM, Sandset PM,
Zivin JA. Detection of arterial emboli using Doppler
ultrasound in rabbits. Stroke. 1991;22:253258.
3.
Markus HS, Brown MM. Differentiation between different
pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial
Doppler in an in vitro model. Stroke. 1993;24:15.
4.
Markus HS, Harrison MJ. Microembolic
signal detection using ultrasound. Stroke. 1995;26:15171519.
5. Bath P, Butterworth RJ, Soo J, Kerr JE. The King's College Hospital Acute Stroke Unit. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996;30:1317.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Merritt CRB. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the carotid arteries. Curr Opin Radiol. 1990;2:223228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinical identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991;337:15211526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Ringlestein EB, Droste DW, Babikian VL, Evans DH,
Grosset DG, Kaps M, Markus HS, Russell D, Siebler M, for the
International Consensus Group on Microembolus Detection. Consensus on
microembolus detection by TCD. Stroke. 1998;29:725729.
9.
Molloy J, Markus HS. Multigate Doppler ultrasound
in the detection of emboli in a flow model, and embolic signals in
patients. Stroke. 1996;27:15481552.
10.
Markus HS, Bland JM, Rose G, Sitzer M, Siebler M. How
good is inter-center agreement in the identification of embolic signals
in carotid artery disease? Stroke. 1996;27:12491252.
11. Ley-Pozo J, Ringlestein EB. Non-invasive detection of occlusive disease of the carotid siphon and middle cerebral artery. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:640647.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Grosset DG, Georgiadis D, Abdullah I, Bone I, Lees KR. Doppler emboli signals vary according to stroke subtype. Stroke. 1994;25:382384.[Abstract]
13.
Del Sette M, Angeli S, Stara I, Finocchi, C, Gandolfo
C. Microembolic signals with serial
transcranial Doppler monitoring in acute focal
ischemic deficit: a local phenomenon? Stroke. 1997;28:13111313.
14.
Van Zuilen EV, Mess WH, Jansen C, Van der Tweel I, van
Gijn J, Ackerstaff RGA. Automatic embolus detection compared with human
experts: a Doppler ultrasound study. Stroke. 1996;27:18401843.
15. Koennecke H, Mast H, Trocio SH Jr, Sacco RL, Ma W, Mohr JP, Thompson JLP. Frequency and determinants of microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler in unselected patients with acute carotid territory ischemia: a prospective study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998;8:107112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Daffertshofer M, Ries S, Schminke U, Hennerici M.
High-intensity transient signals in patients with cerebral
ischemia. Stroke. 1996;27:18441849.
17.
Sliwka U, Lingnau A, Stohlmann W, Schmidt P, Mull M,
Diehl RR, Noth J. Prevalence and time course of
microembolic signals in patients with acute stroke: a
prospective study. Stroke. 1997;28:358363.
18.
Siebler M, Kleinschmidt A, Sitzer M, Steinmetz H,
Freund HJ. Cerebral microembolism in symptomatic and
asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery
stenosis. Neurology. 1994;44:615618.
19.
Markus HS, Thomson N, Brown MM.
Asymptomatic cerebral embolic signals in
symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery
disease. Brain. 1995;118:10051011.
20.
Siebler M, Sitzer M, Rose G, Bendfeldt D, Steinmetz H.
Silent cerebral embolism caused by neurologically
symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis: event
rates before and after carotid endarterectomy.
Brain. 1993;116:10051015.
21.
Babikian VL, Wijman CAC, Hyde C, Cantelmo NL, Winter
MR, Baker E, Pochay V. Cerebral microembolism and early recurrent
cerebral or retinal ischemic events. Stroke. 1997;28:13141318.
22.
Valton L, Larrue V, Pavy Le Traon A, Geraud G. Cerebral
microembolism in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack as
a risk factor for early recurrence. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;63:784787.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y Iguchi, K Kimura, K Kobayashi, Y Ueno, K Shibazaki, and T Inoue Microembolic signals at 48 hours after stroke onset contribute to new ischaemia within a week J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2008; 79(3): 253 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Poppert, S. Sadikovic, K. Sander, O. Wolf, and D. Sander Embolic Signals in Unselected Stroke Patients: Prevalence and Diagnostic Benefit Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2039 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Norrving Lacunar Infarction: Embolism is the Key: Against Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1779 - 1780. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Ferguson If There's Smoke, Is There Fire? Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12): 1442 - 1444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saqqur, N. Dean, M. Schebel, M. D. Hill, A. Salam, A. Shuaib, and A. M. Demchuk Improved Detection of Microbubble Signals Using Power M-Mode Doppler Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35 (1): e14 - e17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Junghans and M. Siebler Cerebral Microembolism Is Blocked by Tirofiban, a Selective Nonpeptide Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Circulation, June 3, 2003; 107(21): 2717 - 2721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kelly, B.J. Hunt, A. Rudd, and R.R. Lewis Should patients with lacunar stroke and severe carotid artery stenosis undergo endarterectomy? QJM, May 1, 2002; 95(5): 313 - 319. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina, J. Alvarez-Sabin, W. Schonewille, J. Montaner, A. Rovira, S. Abilleira, and A. Codina Cerebral microembolism in acute spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection Neurology, December 12, 2000; 55(11): 1738 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T.F. Cheung, H. Markus, and Z. Kaposzta Clinical Relevance of Detecting Asymptomatic Embolic Signals in Acute Stroke Response Stroke, July 1, 2000; 31 (7): 1785 - 1790. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |