(Stroke. 2000;31:161.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (N.J.A., R.J.T., P.D.H.) and Division of Comparative Medicine (S.J.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence to Nabil J. Alkayed, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Blalock 1404, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail nalkayed{at}jhmi.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsFour groups of 16-month old Wistar rats (males [n=9], untreated females [n=9], and females pretreated with 17ß-estradiol [25-µg pellets administered subcutaneously for 7 days; n=9] or progesterone [10-mg pellets administered subcutaneously for 7 days; n=9] were subjected to 2 hours of middle cerebral artery occlusion with the intraluminal filament technique, followed by 22 hours of reperfusion. Physiological variables and laser-Doppler cerebral cortical perfusion were monitored throughout ischemia and early reperfusion. In a separate cohort of males (n=3), untreated females (n=3), females pretreated with 17ß-estradiol (n=3), and females pretreated with progesterone (n=3), end-ischemic regional cerebral blood flow was measured by [14C]iodoantipyrine autoradiography.
ResultsAs predicted, infarct size was not different between middle-aged male and female rats. Cortical infarcts were 21±5% and 31±6% of ipsilateral cerebral cortex, and striatal infarcts were 44±7% and 43±5% of ipsilateral striatum in males and females, respectively. Both estrogen and progesterone reduced cortical infarct in reproductively senescent females (5±2% and 16±4% in estrogen- and progesterone-treated groups, respectively, compared with 31±6% in untreated group). Striatal infarct was smaller in the estrogen- but not in the progesterone-treated group. Relative change in laser-Doppler cerebral cortical perfusion from preischemic baseline and absolute end-ischemic regional cerebral blood flow were not affected by hormonal treatments.
ConclusionsWe conclude that the protection against ischemic brain injury found in young adult female rats disappears after reproductive senescence in middle-aged females and that ovarian hormones alleviate stroke injury in reproductively senescent female rats by a blood flowindependent mechanism. These findings support a role for hormone replacement therapy in stroke injury prevention in postmenopausal women.
Key Words: cerebral ischemia estrogens menopause progesterone stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hormone treatment was initiated from 7 to 14 days before arterial occlusion. A 3-week-release tablet (Innovative Research) containing 25 µg 17ß-estradiol or 10 mg progesterone was inserted subcutaneously through a small incision on the back of the neck with the animals under brief halothane anesthesia (1% to 2% via snout mask in O2-enriched air).
MCA occlusion was performed as previously described.2 Briefly, rats were anesthetized with halothane as described above and instrumented with a femoral artery catheter for monitoring arterial blood pressure and measurement of blood gases. Rectal and temporalis muscle temperatures were measured with thermal probes and were controlled at 37±0.5°C with heating lamps. A 2- to 3-mm-diameter burr hole was drilled in the right parietal bone 2 mm posterior and 6 mm lateral to bregma for placement of the laser-Doppler probe and assessment of cerebral cortical perfusion (LDP) (model MBF3D, Moor Instruments Ltd). The head of the rat was stabilized, and the rat was mounted on a modified stereotaxic frame, as previously described.2 The probe was positioned during the control period over an area devoid of visible blood vessels, and its position was not changed throughout the experiment. The right common carotid artery was exposed through a lateral neck incision, carefully separated from the vagus, and ligated. The external carotid artery was ligated, the occipital branch was cauterized, and the pterygopalatine artery was exposed and ligated. An occluding filament (4-0 monofilament nylon surgical suture with a heat-rounded tip) was advanced into the internal carotid artery until the LDP signal was observed to drop. At the end of 2 hours, the filament was withdrawn, which was associated with a rapid restoration of LDP. After 22 hours of reperfusion, the animal was reanesthetized with 3% halothane, and a blood sample was withdrawn for determination of plasma hormone levels. Plasma 17ß-estradiol and progesterone were measured in duplicate by radioimmunoassay, as previously described.2 The brain was harvested and divided into 7 equally thick coronal slices (each slice was approximately 2 mm thick). Slices were incubated with 1% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) in saline for 30 minutes at 37°C. The rostral and caudal surfaces of each slice were photographed with a digital camera, and images were transferred to a computer and analyzed with image analysis software (Inquiry, Loats Associates). The infarcted area, which was identified by the lack of TTC staining, was measured on the rostral and caudal surfaces of each slice and numerically integrated across the thickness of the slice to obtain an estimate of infarct volume in each slice. Volumes from all 7 slices were summed to calculate total infarct volume over the entire ipsilateral hemisphere. Infarct volume was measured separately in the cerebral cortex and striatum and expressed as a percentage of the volume of the ipsilateral structure.
End-ischemic rCBF was measured in a nonsurvival cohort of Wistar rats with the use of quantitative autoradiography with [14C]IAP, as described previously.2 Animals were instrumented with femoral vascular catheters, and the MCA was occluded as in the previous cohort. At 2 hours of MCA occlusion, arterial blood pressure and blood gases were measured, then 40 µCi of [14C]IAP (New England Nuclear) in 0.8 mL of isotonic saline was infused intravenously for 45 seconds. During infusion, fifteen 20-µL samples of free-flowing arterial blood from the femoral artery catheter were collected in heparin-coated sample tubes. With the filament in place and the laser-Doppler indicating ischemic status, the rat was decapitated 45 seconds after the start of infusion. The brain was quickly removed and frozen at -50°C in 2-methylbutane on dry ice. Each brain was cryostatically sectioned into 20-µm-thick coronal sections at -20° and thaw-mounted onto cover glasses. Sections were apposed for 1 week to film (Kodak, Bio-Max MR) with 14C standards. The concentration of [14C]IAP in blood samples was determined by liquid scintillation spectroscopy (model 3801, Beckman) after decolorization with 0.2 mL of tissue solubilizer (Soluene-350, Packard Instruments Co). Autoradiographic images representing 3 different coronal levels (+2.2, +0.2, and -1.8 mm from the bregma,10 6 to 9 images each) were digitized, and rCBF was determined with the use of image analysis software (Inquiry, Loats). Rates of rCBF were calculated as previously described.2 Two methods of analysis were used to determine rCBF. First, cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured by sampling 0.1-mm2 squares within gray matter of regions most vulnerable to MCA occlusion, the parietal somatosensory cerebral cortex and lateral striatum. Flow rates were averaged within 6 to 9 consecutive brain slices from each of 3 coronal levels. In the second method, areas perfused with predetermined intervals of CBF were isolated by digital image scanning and summed to construct a histogram distribution of brain tissue over incremental ranges of blood flow rates. Areas were averaged among 3 images from each of 5 coronal levels (+2.2, +0.2, -1.8, -3.8, -5.8 mm from bregma) and then were numerically integrated to obtain an estimate of tissue volume for each CBF interval.
All values are reported as mean±SEM unless otherwise indicated. Physiological parameters and LDP were subjected to 2-way ANOVA. Differences in infarct size and autoradiographic rCBF were determined by 1-way ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were made with Newman-Keuls test. The criterion for statistical significance was P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Figure 1
traces the dynamics of LDP
throughout ischemia and early reperfusion. Baseline LDP was not
different among groups and averaged 491±90, 472±64, 387±74, and
371±49 arbitrary units in male, untreated female, estrogen, and
progesterone groups, respectively (n=9 in each group). LDP averaged
40±2%, 33±3%, 32±2%, and 33±4% during the 2-hour occlusion
period in male, untreated female, estrogen, and progesterone groups,
respectively (n=9 in each group). On withdrawal of the occluding
filament, LDP signal was restored to 85±14%, 76±12%, 92±9%, and
77±10% in male, untreated female, estrogen, and progesterone groups,
respectively (n=9 in each group).
|
Figure 2
compares infarct size in the
cerebral cortex and striatum between middle-aged males and females.
Infarct size was similar in males and females at all 7 coronal levels
in both the cerebral cortex and striatum (n=9 in each group). Figure 3
demonstrates the effects of estrogen
and progesterone treatments on cortical and striatal infarcts in RSF
rats. Cortical infarct was reduced from 31±6% of ipsilateral cerebral
cortex in untreated females to 5±2% and 16±4% by estrogen and
progesterone treatments, respectively (n=9 in each group). Striatal
infarct was reduced by estrogen from 43±5% of ipsilateral striatum in
untreated females to 24±6% (n=9 in each group). Striatal infarct was
unaffected by progesterone treatment and averaged 46±6% of
ipsilateral striatum (n=9).
|
|
Figure 4
illustrates rCBF rates within
distinct areas of brain most vulnerable to MCA occlusion, the parietal
somatosensory cerebral cortex and the lateral striatum. Blood flow
rates in these regions within ischemic or control hemispheres
were not different among groups (n=3 in each group) and averaged
22±17, 42±13, 36±19, and 37±22 mL/100 g per minute in the
ischemic parietal cortex and 21±17, 18±10, 19±12, and 9±5
mL/100 g per minute in the ischemic lateral striatum of male,
untreated female, estrogen, and progesterone groups, respectively.
Figure 5
is a histogram of brain tissue
volume distribution over 10-mL/100 g per minute increments of rCBF. The
amount of tissue within the ischemic hemisphere perfused at
flow rates between 0 to 100 mL/100 g per minute was equivalent between
males and females and was not affected by hormonal treatments.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Average longevity in rat is approximately 2 to 3 years of age, depending on strain, sex, and genetic background. Female rats mature sexually during early adulthood (by 2 to 3 months of age) and begin to display 4 to 5 day estrous cycles. Regular cyclicity is evident until middle age, when female rats undergo a transition to irregular cyclicity and finally to acyclicity by 12 to 18 months of age. On average, fertility is lost by 10 to 12 months, and the animal is termed "reproductively senescent."11 Reproductive senescence in rodents has been used to study neuroendocrine changes associated with menopause in women. We chose to study RSF rats at 16 months to distinguish the role of waning ovarian hormones in ischemic injury without the confounding effects of advanced aging on brain morphology or cardiovascular function.
Our present finding that RSF rats sustain similar brain injury after stroke compared with age-matched males is in contrast with our previous finding2 that ischemic brain injury is smaller in young adult females than in age-matched males. The difference between our previous and present findings is likely related to loss of female reproductive function in RSF rats, since infarct size in middle-aged females (31±6% in cortex and 43±5% in striatum) is larger than the infarct observed in young adult females in our previous study (9±3% in cortex and 20±5% in striatum).2 The protection against ischemic brain injury found in young adult female rats compared with age-matched males is likely a function of ovarian hormones since the protection is lost after surgical ovariectomy2 4 and can be partially restored by estrogen replacement.5 6 7 8 9 The larger infarct in RSF rats compared with young adult females is not a function of age alone since infarct size in males was not different between these 2 age groups (26±7% in cortex and 42±2% in striatum in young adults2 and 21±5% in cortex and 44±7% in striatum in middle-aged rats). Aging (>20 months) exacerbates cerebral infarction in rodent models of focal ischemia,12 13 14 15 but the effect on neuronal susceptibility to global ischemia in rodents is inconsistent and may be affected by strain,16 sex,15 17 genetic background (presence of hypertension17 ), experimental conditions,18 and location of affected neurons (hippocampus versus cortex/striatum15 ).
Our findings are in agreement with the observations that neuronal susceptibility to the cytotoxic effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists is age dependent only in females.19 The observation is also consistent with the finding that vulnerability of hippocampal neurons to transient forebrain ischemia increases with age in hypertensive female rats.17 Finally, these findings are in agreement with the epidemiological observation that stroke risk, which is low in premenopausal women, rises after menopause to equal that of men.1
Treatment with 17ß-estradiol in this study reduced cortical and striatal infarcts in RSF rats. This is consistent with our previous findings9 20 and that of others5 6 7 8 9 21 that estrogen replacement reduces ischemic brain injury in surgically ovariectomized young female rats. Our demonstration of the neuroprotective effect of estrogen in this study is novel and important in that RSF rats correspond to and model a clinically relevant age group in humans, postmenopausal women, in which the neuroprotective effect of estrogen is most relevant insofar as stroke injury is concerned.
The ability of estrogen to attenuate cerebral infarction in this study
is unlikely to be related to the ability of estrogen to enhance tissue
perfusion during ischemia7 22 since perfusion of
brain regions affected by MCA occlusion was not different in
estrogen-treated versus untreated females. Both region-specific CBF and
CBF distribution across the hemisphere were similar among treatment
groups (Figures 3
and 4
). We9 and
others8 have previously demonstrated that exogenously
administered estrogen exerts a flow-independent neuroprotective effect
in young ovariectomized rats. Our results, however, do not exclude the
possibility that blood flow differences during the reperfusion period
may play a role in mediating the beneficial effect of the hormone
against cerebral ischemia. Estrogen has been shown to
ameliorate postischemic hyperemia after global
incomplete ischemia in female rabbits.22
The mechanism(s) of estrogen-mediated neuroprotection is unknown but is
likely multifactorial. Possible mechanisms include attenuation of
oxidative injury via its antioxidant activity,23
prevention of intracellular calcium accumulation,24
inhibition of NMDA-induced excitotoxicity,25 26 enhanced
expression of neurotrophin receptors,27 28 possibly by
activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling
pathways,29 30 and modulation of antiapoptotic
bcl-2 gene expression.31 32 At least part of the
neuroprotective effects of estrogen are likely receptor mediated since
estrogen receptor blockade exacerbates brain injury after MCA occlusion
in female mice.33 It does not, however, appear to be
mediated by the
subtype of estrogen receptor since female estrogen
receptor-
knockout mice display smaller infarcts after MCA occlusion
compared with wild-type controls.3 Importantly, it is not
known whether the mechanisms of ischemic injury and
neuroprotection are similar in young adult and RSF rats. The
possibility of an interaction between aging-related neurodegeneration,
ischemic vulnerability, and estrogen-mediated effects is quite
feasible and underscored by a recent report indicating that the
responsiveness of dentate granule cells to aging and estradiol is
sexually dimorphic.34
Progesterone treatment was associated with smaller infarct in the cerebral cortex but not in striatum. The cortical protection is consistent with the demonstration that progesterone reduces damage after traumatic brain injury in ovariectomized rats35 and after focal ischemia in male rats36 and global ischemia in ovariectomized cats.37 A very limited number of observational studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of progestins alone38 on stroke risk in humans; however, the addition of progestin did not attenuate the cardioprotective effects of postmenopausal estrogen therapy.39 In an ongoing randomized trial for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women, an early increase, but a long-term decrease, in risk of coronary heart disease was associated with the use of estrogen plus progestin therapy.40
Our data demonstrate that progesterone is beneficial in experimental
stroke, but in a more restrictive manner than estrogen. The mechanism
of the observed cortical protection is unclear at present but is
not related to preservation of tissue perfusion. Both the magnitude and
distribution of rCBF during ischemia were unaltered by
progesterone treatment. Others have shown that progesterone-treated
rats exhibit better behavioral recovery and less edema and secondary
neuronal loss after traumatic brain injury than untreated
controls.41 42 Brains of progesterone-treated rats contain
less 8-isoprostaglandin F-2-
, a marker of lipid
peroxidation, after cortical contusion than vehicle-treated
rats.43 Progesterone attenuates lipid peroxidation induced
by FeSO4 and amyloid ß-peptide and protects
neuronal cultures against glutamate toxicity and glucose
deprivation.25 Progesterone is also known to
modulate
-aminobutyric acid receptor channel activity and
expression44 and attenuate excitatory neuronal
responses,45 which allow for the anxiolytic46
and antiepileptic47 properties of progesterone. Finally,
progesterone is synthesized in brain by glia and enhances neurite
outgrowth and axonal regeneration.48 The differing scope
of protection by progesterone versus estrogen (lack of striatal
protection by progesterone) may be related to different
ischemic mechanisms in striatum versus the cerebral cortex or
to differences in regional expression of progesterone versus estrogen
receptors. This hypothesis would be consistent with in vitro
reports that, in contrast to 17ß-estradiol, progesterone fails to
protect neuronal cultures from cell death caused by the neurotoxins
amyloid ß-protein, hydrogen peroxide, and glutamate.29
Whether combined estrogen and progesterone treatment has additive
neuroprotective effect over any treatment alone has not been tested.
The 2 steroids could also interact at the receptor level since estrogen
and estrogen plus progesterone have been shown to upregulate
progesterone receptor expression in brain.49
In summary, we have demonstrated that, in contrast to the protection against ischemic injury found in young females, RSF rats sustain brain damage after experimental stroke similar to that in age-matched males. Loss of protection is presumably related to reproductive senescence since treatment with either estrogen or progesterone reduces cortical infarction. Striatal infarct, however, was reduced only by estrogen treatment. A direct neuroprotective effect of ovarian steroids is suggested by the finding that neither estrogen nor progesterone had an effect on rCBF during ischemia. These results indicate that ovarian hormones are protective in the setting of cerebral ischemia and lend support for the use of hormone replacement therapy in brain injury prevention after stroke in postmenopausal women.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 11, 1999; revision received September 8, 1999; accepted October 14, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Department of Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism by which estrogen may provide protection against ischemic damage is multifactorial but seems to be unrelated to changes in blood flow alone.3 This observation might also be expected, given the multiple tissues in which estrogen affects function, including all components in the vascular wall (endothelium, vascular smooth muscle, neurotransmission),4 5 as well as neuronal function within the brain6 and nongenomic effects that might be related to scavenging oxygen-derived free radicals.7
Although estrogen seems to limit ischemic "stroke" in experimental studies, evidence from human clinical trials is less clear.8 9 In case-controlled epidemiological studies, neither an increase nor decrease in the incidence of stroke was observed with estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone therapy. There are considerable limitations in extrapolating effects of estrogen replacement therapy in experimental cerebral ischemia to the incidence of strokes in humans. The outcome of human studies not only needs to address the incidence of stroke but also to differentiate between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Also, results from experimental studies show that estrogen did not eliminate neuronal damage associated with cerebral ischemia but rather limited its extent. Appropriate measures in human trials to determine effects of estrogen therapy on cerebral ischemia may not be only the incident rate but rather the extent (severity) of event and rate of recovery. Alternatively, estrogen as an adjunct to interventional surgical management (carotid endarterectomy) for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis may be a more appropriate clinical circumstance for testing outcomes of estrogen in preventing cerebral ischemia. In a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, women had about twice the perioperative complications as men after carotid endarterectomy and 5-year event rate (stroke) was reduced by only 7% in women compared with a 66% reduction in men.10 The hormonal status of women, including past estrogen use, was not reported in this multicenter trial. However, based on the accompanying paper, the question arises of whether short-term, low-dose estrogen therapy before the intervention would improve outcome following the surgical procedure in women. Therefore, observations from experimental studies that demonstrate reduction in ischemic neuronal damage with estrogen replacement therapy should not be extrapolated as evidence for estrogen-reducing risk or incidence rate only. Delineating the effects of estrogen therapy in limiting stroke in humans may be clarified only when measures other than incidence rates are carefully documented, that is, as the authors of the accompanying paper conclude, to determine whether hormone replacement therapy limits brain injury after stroke in postmenopausal women.
Received August 11, 1999; revision received September 8, 1999; accepted October 14, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Vagnerova, I. P. Koerner, and P. D. Hurn Gender and the Injured Brain Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 201 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Miller and S. P. Duckles Vascular Actions of Estrogens: Functional Implications Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2008; 60(2): 210 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Renolleau, S. Fau, and C. Charriaut-Marlangue Gender-Related Differences in Apoptotic Pathways After Neonatal Cerebral Ischemia Neuroscientist, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 46 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Gibson, L. J. Gray, P. M. W. Bath, and S. P. Murphy Progesterone for the treatment of experimental brain injury; a systematic review Brain, February 1, 2008; 131(2): 318 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dziennis, T. Jia, O. K. Ronnekleiv, P. D. Hurn, and N. J. Alkayed Role of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-3 in Estradiol-Mediated Neuroprotection J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7268 - 7274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schumacher, R. Guennoun, A. Ghoumari, C. Massaad, F. Robert, M. El-Etr, Y. Akwa, K. Rajkowski, and E.-E. Baulieu Novel Perspectives for Progesterone in Hormone Replacement Therapy, with Special Reference to the Nervous System Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2007; 28(4): 387 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Vasudevan and D. W. Pfaff Membrane-Initiated Actions of Estrogens in Neuroendocrinology: Emerging Principles Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2007; 28(1): 1 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Krause, S. P. Duckles, and D. A. Pelligrino Influence of sex steroid hormones on cerebrovascular function J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1252 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Hilton, L. L. Bambrick, S. M. Thompson, and M. M. McCarthy Estradiol Modulation of Kainic Acid-Induced Calcium Elevation in Neonatal Hippocampal Neurons Endocrinology, March 1, 2006; 147(3): 1246 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Littleton-Kearney, J. M. Gaines, K. P. Callahan, S. J. Murphy, and P. D. Hurn Effects of Estrogen on Platelet Reactivity After Transient Forebrain Ischemia in Rats Biol Res Nurs, October 1, 2005; 7(2): 135 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Tosi, B. D. Boyan, and A. L. Boskey Does Sex Matter in Musculoskeletal Health? The Influence of Sex and Gender on Musculoskeletal Health J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1631 - 1647. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |