| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2000;31:95.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (C.R.G., J.B.T., R.T., M.S.C.), Medicine (Cardiology) (V.K.M., M.W.L.), and Radiology (V.R.W.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Correspondence to Camilo R. Gomez, MD, Comprehensive Stroke Center, 1202 Jefferson Tower, 625 S 19th St, Birmingham, AL 35294. E-mail crgomez{at}uab.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsTwelve patients underwent elective stenting of the basilar artery after episodes of vertebrobasilar ischemia. In all patients, either medical therapy had failed or the patient had a contraindication for long-term anticoagulation. Information from independent neurological examinations, quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was collected. Differences between pretreatment and posttreatment degree of stenoses were subjected to 1-way ANOVA for repeated measures.
ResultsThere were 10 men and 2 women, all white, aged 40 to 82 years (mean age, 62.6 years). Stent placement was successful in all patients, leading to statistically significant changes in the degree of stenosis, from 71.4% (range, 53% to 90%) to 10.3% (range, 0% to 36%) (P<0.0001). There were no deaths, stent thromboses, perforations, ruptures, or myocardial infarctions. Clinical follow-up was available for 0.5 to 16 months (mean, 5.9 months). One patient had nonspecific symptoms, and another had a transient ischemic attack. All other patients remained asymptomatic.
ConclusionsElective stenting of the basilar artery is feasible, with minimal risk to the patient. Its impact on long-term stroke prevention and its durability are unknown and will require further study.
Key Words: angioplasty basilar artery stenosis stents
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A complete neurological history was taken, and an examination was performed on all patients by an independent neurologist not involved in the interventional procedure. Such a neurological evaluation was performed before the procedure and again at 24-hour, 4-week, and 6-month follow-ups. Preprocedural measurement of stenoses was performed either by hand with calipers on radiographic films or with the use of online quantitative angiography (Integris, Phillips Medical Systems). The quantitative angiography measurements were also performed on all vessels before and after stenting, as well as at follow-up angiography when this was carried out. The degree of stenosis was calculated in relation to the adjacent distal normal vessel diameter (analogous to the method of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial for grading carotid stenosis), and calibration of the measurements was performed with the contrast-filled guiding catheter used as the reference.
All clinical, angiographic, and stenting data were recorded on case report forms by a physician. The clinical end points were as follows: (1) any stroke (disabling or not), myocardial infarction, or death within the first 30 days of the procedure; (2) repeated intervention by angioplasty or surgery within the 6 months that followed the procedure; and (3) clinical status at the 6-month follow-up visit. Angiographic end points were as follows: (1) minimum lumen diameter and percent stenosis after stenting and (2) minimum lumen diameter and percent stenosis on any follow-up angiogram performed during follow-up. Restenosis was defined as a stenosis >50%.
The preprocedure and postprocedure protocols were analogous to those
previously described.14 All patients were premedicated
with aspirin and either ticlopidine (Ticlid, Roche, Inc) or clopidogrel
(Plavix, Sanofi, Inc). Percutaneous access was
obtained via 1 of the femoral arteries, where a 6F or 7F catheter
sheath was introduced. The subclavian artery from which the larger
vertebral artery originated was engaged with a 5F Newton 5 catheter
(HN5), which was directed into the vertebral artery over a
0.038-inch hydrophilic-coated wire (Glidewire, Meditech,
Inc). Heparin, at a dose of 100 U/kg, was administered through
the diagnostic catheter. This was then exchanged by a 6F or
7F multipurpose or straight guiding catheter, whose tip was advanced up
to the level of the second cervical vertebra. Preprocedural
angiographic images were then obtained in orthogonal planes
(Figure
). The lesions were crossed with a
hydrophilic-tipped 0.014-inch wire (Trascend, Meditech, Inc or Choice
PT, SciMed, Inc), and this was advanced within a flexible microcatheter
(ie, Turbo Tracker, Target Therapeutics, Inc or Transit, Cordis, Inc)
or directly within the predilation balloon. The tip of the wire was
positioned in the second portion of 1 of the posterior cerebral
arteries to ensure maximum support. The lesions were then predilated
with a 2.0- to 3.0-mmx10- to 20-mm coronary balloon (ie,
Predator XL or Ninja, Cordis, Inc) at 4 to 6 atm for 30 to 45 seconds
with the use of a standard insufflator. The maximal pressure of
inflation was achieved by very slowly and gently inflating the balloon
until no waist was visible. The original wire was then exchanged for a
260-cm, 0.014-inch floppy-tipped exchange support wire (ie, Luge Sci
Med, Inc). A 3.0- to 3.5-mmx8- to 9-mm flexible coronary stent
(ie, Microstent II or GFX, Advanced Vascular Engineering, Inc or
Multilink Duet, Guidant, Inc) was then deployed across the point of
stenosis (Figure
). Deployment of the stents was
performed by inflating the balloon to 9 to 10 atm. Both
antiplatelet agents were continued for 4 weeks, after which the
patients were only treated with aspirin 325 mg/d.
|
The results of all measurements were entered into a computerized database and subjected to statistical analysis with the use of dedicated software (GB-Stat, Dynamic Microsystems, Inc). Demographic variables were analyzed with descriptive statistics. The differences between preprocedural and postprocedural degree of stenosis were compared by 1-way ANOVA for repeated measures.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
There were no direct procedure-related myocardial infarctions or deaths. Three patients complained of severe headache at the time of stent deployment. The headache improved significantly after balloon deflation and abated over a period of a few hours in 2 patients and within a few days in the third. One patient complained of double vision after the procedure. He had a normal neurological examination, and his double vision disappeared within a few days. Another patient complained of blurred vision after the procedure and was found to have sixth and seventh nerve pareses; these completely resolved within 8 weeks. None of the patients experienced wound infections, bleeding requiring transfusions, or significant bradycardia, hypotension, or loss of consciousness with balloon inflations. There were no stent thromboses, wire perforations, or arterial ruptures.
Clinical follow-up was available in all patients, with the follow-up
period varying from 0.5 to 16 months (mean, 5.9 months) (Table 2
). Angiographic follow-up was
available in 2 patients. In 1 asymptomatic patient,
angiography failed to show any evidence of restenosis. The
second patient (patient 6) suffered an episode of seeing "flashing
lights" 4 months after basilar artery stenting. This prompted a
repeated angiogram, which disclosed occlusion of the basilar artery
proximal to the stent. The vessel was successfully recanalized by
balloon angioplasty; at present the patient is being treated with
warfarin, and a follow-up angiogram is planned in 6 to 8 weeks. The
only other patient with symptoms during the follow-up period complained
of nonspecific dizziness and lightheadedness. He suffers from a severe
cardiomyopathy, and his current complaints are
different than those that prompted basilar stenting. Immediately after
stenting, all patients were treated only with antiplatelet therapy,
even those who had required warfarin for symptom control before the
procedure. The 1 exception is patient 1, who also suffers from atrial
fibrillation and requires long-term anticoagulation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In comparison with other vascular beds, balloon angioplasty of the cerebral arteries within the subarachnoid space represents an interventional challenge.4 15 16 17 18 First, these are more delicate, thin-walled vessels, with greater risk for rupture with significant morbidity and mortality.4 Second, the vessels are contained within a fluid environment, giving rise to totally different transmural pressures at the time of balloon inflation and possibly contributing to greater recoil.15 16 Finally, part of the reluctance to perform balloon angioplasty of the basilar and middle cerebral arteries has been the risk of causing occlusion of the ostia of the penetrating vessels by the compressing effect of the inflated balloon on the plaque. In our cases, it is likely that the pontine perforators continue to flow through the interstices of the stent. Alternatively, significant collaterals may prevent the development of brain stem infarction. No disabling strokes occurred as a result of the procedures performed in our patients. It is possible to argue that the 2 patients with visual complaints had small brain stem infarctions. However, no evidence of such was found by imaging. An alternative explanation is that, as the deployed stent expands the wall of the basilar artery, the adventitia irritates the adjacent cranial nerves, producing temporary symptoms.
Although balloon angioplasty of the basilar artery has been reported,15 16 17 18 only a few cases of basilar stenting can be found in the existing literature. Higashida et al19 described a patient with a dissecting traumatic aneurysm of the basilar artery, which required stenting of the parent vessel to allow its coiling. In another institution, a patient with acute stroke caused by occlusion of the basilar artery was treated by intra-arterial thrombolysis, but recurrent occlusion of the vessel despite balloon angioplasty prompted the authors to place a second-generation flexible coronary stent (GRII, Cook Cardiology, Inc) to maintain vessel patency.19A
To our knowledge, ours is the only small series of successful elective stenting of the basilar artery for symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions. We attribute the success of the procedures to the considerable advances made recently in terms of interventional equipment. The guidewires used have hydrophilic-coated soft tips, allowing their placement in the distal intracranial vasculature while providing adequate support for stent deployment. In our experience, it seems essential that the wire tip be anchored in the posterior cerebral artery to facilitate tracking of the balloons and the stents. Although this can be accomplished by having the microwire and the predilation balloon advance as a unit, it is sometimes necessary to advance the wire with a microcatheter and then switch the former for an exchange length 0.014-inch wire. The balloons used have very low profiles and are easily tracked, making them capable of reaching even the cortical branches of the middle cerebral and posterior cerebral arteries. The stents used, all of which were of the newer generation of coronary stents, are provided sheathless and premounted on a balloon with a nominal pressure of 9 to 10 atm. These stents have excellent longitudinal flexibility, provide excellent coverage of the vessel surface, and have minimal recoil. We consider the significant difference in stenosis reduction of major clinical importance, since previous reports of balloon angioplasty of intracranial lesions have shown only modest overall improvement of lumen diameter.16 20 21 22 This apparently improved angiographic outcome may affect the ability to discontinue long-term anticoagulation, which is also a shortcoming seen in at least some angioplasty series.21 Clearly, our angiographic follow-up is not optimal since only a minority of patients returned for angiography. Future studies will have to take this into account, since it has been our experience that noninvasive methods are inadequate to assess patency of the stent.
The demonstration of carotid endarterectomy as an effective method for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with significant extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery lesions has made carotid revascularization the standard of care for these patients.23 However, for patients whose lesions are not readily accessible to surgery, medical therapy has been the only therapeutic option. For patients with intracranial stenotic lesions, this often implies long-term anticoagulation with warfarin.24 It seems intuitive that balloon angioplasty represents a potential solution for effective reduction of stroke risk in these patients, yet the inherent risk of vessel dissection, distal embolization, or rupture has limited its widespread use.1 2 3 4 Although recent experience suggests that there have been significant improvements in technique and materials,16 20 21 22 the impact of balloon angioplasty on the degree of stenosis is minimal, and most patients continue to be treated with warfarin after the procedure. On the other hand, our patients had significant reduction of the stenosis by stenting and did not require any further long-term anticoagulation.
Our cases demonstrate that angioplasty and stenting of the basilar artery are technically feasible and that they may be performed without causing significant neurological injury. Still, it is impossible to know whether the results we achieved in the treatment of our patients are exceptional or if they can be reproduced consistently in this subset of patients at risk for stroke. Furthermore, it is impossible to know whether stenting will lead to better outcomes and reduced stroke risk or how it will compare with medical treatment in the future. Greater experience with the technique described should allow a better definition of the role of stenting in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the basilar arteries as well as other arteries in the subarachnoid space.
Received August 18, 1999; revision received September 28, 1999; accepted September 29, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Takis C, Kwan ES, Pessin MS, Jacobs DH, Caplan LR. Intracranial angioplasty: experience and complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.. 1997;18:16611668.[Abstract]
3. Purdy PD, Devous MD Sr, Unwin DH, Giller CA, Batjer HH. Angioplasty of an atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery associated with improvement in regional cerebral blood flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.. 1990;11:878880.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Volk EE, Prayson RA, Perl J. Autopsy findings of fatal complication of posterior cerebral circulatory angioplasty. Arch Pathol Lab Med.. 1997;121:738740.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Theron J. Protected carotid angioplasty and carotid stents [in French]. J Mal Vasc. 1996;21(suppl A):113122.
6. Roubin GS, Yadav S, Iyer SS, Vitek J. Carotid stent-supported angioplasty: a neurovascular intervention to prevent stroke. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(3A):812.
7.
Yadav JS, Roubin GS, King P, Iyer S, Vitek J.
Angioplasty and stenting for restenosis after carotid
endarterectomy: initial experience.
Stroke. 1996;27:20752079.
8.
Yadav JS, Roubin GS, Iyer S, Vitek J, King P, Jordan
WD, Fisher WS. Elective stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries.
Circulation. 1997;95:376381.
9. Al-Mubarak N, Gomez CR, Vitek JJ, Roubin GS. Stenting of symptomatic intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:19491951.[Abstract]
10. Dorros G, Cohn JM, Palmer LE. Stent deployment resolves a petrous carotid artery angioplasty dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:392394.[Abstract]
11. Feldman RL, Trigg L, Gaudier J, Galat J. Use of coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent in the percutaneous treatment of an intracranial carotid artery stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;38:316319.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Emery DJ, Ferguson RDG, Williams JS. Pulsatile tinnitus cured by angioplasty and stenting of petrous carotid artery stenosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,. 1998;124:460461.
13.
Mori T, Kazita K, Mori K. Cerebral angioplasty and
stenting for intracranial vertebral atherosclerotic stenosis.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.. 1999;20:787789.
14. Gomez CR. The role of carotid angioplasty and stenting. Sem Neurol.. 1998;18:501511.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Terada T, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Nakai E,
Yokote H, Itakura T, Hieshima, G. Transluminal angioplasty for
arteriosclerotic disease of the distal vertebral
and basilar arteries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.. 1996;60:377381.
16. McKenzie JD, Wallace RC, Dean BL, Flom RA, Khayata MH. Preliminary results of intracranial angioplasty for vascular stenosis caused by atherosclerosis and vasculitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.. 1996;17:263268.[Abstract]
17. Houdart E, Ricolfi F, Brugieres P, Antoine JC, Gaston A. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of atherosclerotic basilar artery stenosis. Neuroradiology.. 1996;38:383385.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Houdart E. Angioplasty of three intracranial vertebro-basilar atherosclerotic stenoses [in French]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1997;181:333339; comment 339340.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Higashida RT, Smith W, Gress D, Urwin R, Dowd CF, Balousek PA, Halbach VV. Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:944949.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Callahan AS, Berger BL. Intracranial balloon angioplasty of the vertebrobasilar junction with placement of an endovascular prosthesis into the basilar artery. J Neuroimaging.. 1998;8:122. Abstract.
20.
Suh DC, Sung K-B, Cho YS, Choi CG, Lee HK, Lee JH, Kim
JS, Lee MC. Transluminal angioplasty for middle cerebral artery
stenosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.. 1999;20:553558.
21.
Marks MP, Marcellus M, Norbash AM, Steinberg GK, Tong
D, Albers GW. Outcome of angioplasty for atherosclerotic intracranial
stenosis. Stroke.. 1999;30:10651069.
22. Mori T, Fukuoka M, Kazita K, Mori K. Follow-up after intracranial percutaneous transluminal cerebral balloon angioplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.. 1998;19:15251533.[Abstract]
23.
Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, Whittemore AD,
Harbaugh RE, Dempsey RJ, Caplan LR, Kresowik TF, Matchar DB, Toole JF,
Easton JD, Adams HP Jr, Brass LM, Hobson RWN, Brott TG, Sternau L.
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement
for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke
Council, American Heart Association.. Circulation.. 1998;97:501509.
24.
Chimowitz MI, Kokkinos J, Strong J, Brown MB, Levine
SR, Silliman S, Pessin MS, Weichel E, Sila CA, Furlan AJ. The
Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study.
Neurology.. 1995;45:14881493.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Nahab, M. J. Lynn, S. E. Kasner, M. J. Alexander, R. Klucznik, O. O. Zaidat, J. Chaloupka, H. Lutsep, S. Barnwell, M. Mawad, et al. Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting Neurology, June 9, 2009; 72(23): 2014 - 2019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Groschel, S. Schnaudigel, S. M. Pilgram, K. Wasser, and A. Kastrup A Systematic Review on Outcome After Stenting for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e340 - e347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Schumacher, P. M. Meyers, R. T. Higashida, C. P. Derdeyn, S. D. Lavine, G. M. Nesbit, D. Sacks, P. Rasmussen, and L. R. Wechsler Reporting Standards for Angioplasty and Stent-Assisted Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e348 - e365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Siddiq, G. Vazquez, M. Z. Memon, M. F. K. Suri, R. A. Taylor, J. C. Wojak, J. C. Chaloupka, and A. I. Qureshi Comparison of Primary Angioplasty With Stent Placement for Treating Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Diseases: A Multicenter Study Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2505 - 2510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Imai, T. Mori, H. Izumoto, T. Kunieda, N. Takabatake, S. Yamamoto, and M. Watanabe Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Occlusive Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 773 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.C. Suh, J.K. Kim, J.W. Choi, B.S. Choi, H.W. Pyun, Y.J. Choi, M.-H. Kim, H.R. Yang, H.I. Ha, S.J. Kim, et al. Intracranial Stenting of Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: Results of 100 Consecutive Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 781 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Jiang, T. Srivastava, F. Gao, B. Du, K. H. Dong, and X. T. Xu Perforator stroke after elective stenting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis Neurology, June 27, 2006; 66(12): 1868 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Kasner, M. I. Chimowitz, M. J. Lynn, H. Howlett-Smith, B. J. Stern, V. S. Hertzberg, M. R. Frankel, S. R. Levine, S. Chaturvedi, C. G. Benesch, et al. Predictors of Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of a Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 555 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. O. Zaidat, T. P. Smith, M. J. Alexander, W. Yu, W.S. Smith, V. Singh, N.U. Ko, S.P. Cullen, C.F. Dowd, V.V. Halbach, et al. Long-term outcome of endovascular stenting for symptomatic basilar artery stenosis Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1340 - 1341. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Intracranial Angioplasty & Stenting for Cerebral Atherosclerosis: A Position Statement of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2323 - 2327. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kim, B. H. Lee, D. I. Kim, W. H. Shim, P. Jeon, and T. H. Lee Stent-Assisted Angioplasty of Symptomatic Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis: Feasibility and Follow-up Results AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1381 - 1388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Mayer, G. F. Hamann, G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, and H. Bruckmann Treatment of Vertebrobasilar Occlusion by Using a Coronary Waterjet Thrombectomy Device: A Pilot Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1389 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Amin-Hanjani, X. Du, M. Zhao, K. Walsh, T. W. Malisch, and F. T. Charbel Use of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Angiography to Stratify Stroke Risk in Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Disease Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1140 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bash, J. P. Villablanca, R. Jahan, G. Duckwiler, M. Tillis, C. Kidwell, J. Saver, and J. Sayre Intracranial Vascular Stenosis and Occlusive Disease: Evaluation with CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1012 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yu, W. S. Smith, V. Singh, N. U. Ko, S. P. Cullen, C. F. Dowd, V. V. Halbach, and R. T. Higashida Long-term outcome of endovascular stenting for symptomatic basilar artery stenosis Neurology, March 22, 2005; 64(6): 1055 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Marks, M. L. Marcellus, H. M. Do, P. K. Schraedley-Desmond, G. K. Steinberg, D. C. Tong, and G. W. Albers Intracranial Angioplasty without Stenting for Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Long-Term Follow-up AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 525 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Masuo, T. Terada, G. Walker, M. Tsuura, K. Nakai, and T. Itakura Patency of Perforating Arteries after Stent Placement? A Study Using an In Vivo Experimental Atherosclerosis-Induced Model AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 543 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tsumoto, T. Terada, M. Tsuura, H. Matsumoto, O. Masuo, H. Yamaga, and T. Itakura Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Abnormalities after Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2005; 26(2): 385 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Molina, M. Ribo, F. Romero, and J. Alvarez-Sabin Hemodynamic changes in the basilar artery following stenting Neurology, April 27, 2004; 62(8): 1398 - 1398. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. du Mesnil de Rochemont, B. Turowski, M. Buchkremer, M. Sitzer, F. E. Zanella, and J. Berkefeld Recurrent Symptomatic High-Grade Intracranial Stenoses: Safety and Efficacy of Undersized Stents-- Initial Experience Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 45 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gupta, H.C. Schumacher, S. Mangla, P.M. Meyers, H. Duong, A.G. Khandji, R.S. Marshall, J.P. Mohr, and J. Pile-Spellman Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis Neurology, December 23, 2003; 61(12): 1729 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chaturvedi and R. Fessler Angioplasty and stenting for stroke prevention: Good questions that need answers Neurology, September 10, 2002; 59(5): 664 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Masuo, T. Terada, G. Walker, M. Tsuura, H. Matsumoto, K. Tohya, M. Kimura, K. Nakai, and T. Itakura Study of the Patency of Small Arterial Branches after Stent Placement with an Experimental in Vivo Model AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2002; 23(4): 706 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lylyk, J. E. Cohen, R. Ceratto, A. Ferrario, and C. Miranda Angioplasty and Stent Placement in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenoses and Dissections AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2002; 23(3): 430 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Gomez and S. C. Orr Angioplasty and Stenting for Primary Treatment of Intracranial Arterial Stenoses Arch Neurol, October 1, 2001; 58(10): 1687 - 1690. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Chimowitz Angioplasty or Stenting Is Not Appropriate as First-Line Treatment of Intracranial Stenosis Arch Neurol, October 1, 2001; 58(10): 1690 - 1692. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Phatouros, J. E. Lefler, R. T. Higashida, P. M. Meyers, A. M. Malek, C. F. Dowd, and V. V. Halbach Primary Stenting for High-grade Basilar Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1744 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Lutsep and W. M. Clark Association of intracranial stenosis with cortical symptoms or signs Neurology, September 12, 2000; 55(5): 716 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Nahser, H. Henkes, W. Weber, E. Berg-Dammer, T. A. Yousry, and D. Kuhne Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Stenosis:Angioplasty and Follow-up AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., July 1, 2000; 21(7): 1293 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |