(Stroke. 2000;31:2421.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Radiology (M.W.) and Neurology (G.S.), Medical University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Correspondence to Priv-Doz Dr Günter Seidel, MD, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany. E-mail seidel_g{at}neuro.mu-luebeck.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsIn 13 healthy volunteers, 2 doses (0.5 and 1.5 mL) of Optison, a perfluoropropane-containing ultrasound contrast agent, were injected intravenously, and they produced a strong increase in echo enhancement in the brain parenchyma. The contrast agent was injected twice for ultrasound examination of both hemispheres. A total of 24 hemispheres per dose was available for further analysis. We used harmonic imaging for quantification of echo enhancement. Color-coded perfusion maps were calculated from the ultrasound data. In 1 subject, magnetic resonance images were obtained parallel to the orientation of the ultrasound scans.
ResultsAfter administration of both doses of Optison, it was possible to evaluate brain tissue perfusion in all 24 hemispheres. Subtraction of precontrast images and color coding enhanced the visualization of hemispheric perfusion. The epiphyseal gland, anterior interhemispheric fissure, third ventricle, and lateral fissure can be used as reliable anatomic landmarks. Artifacts caused by abrupt changes in thickness of the temporal bone are observed as signal-void streaks oriented from the ultrasound probe toward the cerebral midline.
ConclusionsHarmonic gray-scale imaging with Optison shows strong echo enhancement in the brain parenchyma. By calculating color-coded perfusion maps, it is possible to visualize human brain tissue perfusion at the patients bedside.
Key Words: contrast media perfluorocarbons perfusion ultrasonography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of this second evaluation of the data was to investigate an automated, color-coded evaluation method of harmonic gray-scale imaging. This analysis is of particular interest for the design of further investigations intending to visualize perfusion defects by ultrasound methods in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ultrasound Contrast Agent
Optison is a perfluoropropane-containing ultrasound contrast
agent based on a 1% albumin solution.6 This
contrast agent is commercially available and was originally developed
for echocardiology (generic FS069, Mallinckrodt Inc).
The solution was prepared by following the manufacturers
instructions. Two intravenous bolus injections of 0.5 and
1.5 mL (injection speed of 1 mL/s) were used. Each injection was
followed immediately by a second bolus of 3 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution
to ensure clearance of the residual ultrasound contrast agent in the
venous system. The time between the 2 ultrasound contrast agent bolus
injections was 5 to 10 minutes.
Transcranial Sonography
The investigation was performed as described
earlier.4 Harmonic gray-scale imaging was performed with
an HP SONOS 5500 ultrasound system (Agilent Technologies)
connected to a 1.8-/3.6-MHz sector transducer (S4 probe, Agilent
Technologies) at an investigation depth of 10 cm (focus at 8 cm). For
gray-scale imaging, we used the integrated backscatter mode and the
study type T-INT (mechanical index of 1.0 to 1.1).
After each contrast agent injection, 62 digitalized, gray-scale images of the brain triggered by the electrocardiogram were stored in continuous-loop-review memory and were then recorded on optical disc for offline analysis. We used the transient-response imaging mode7 with a frame rate of 1 image every 4 cardiac cycles. Gain and transmit power settings were optimized for each volunteer at the beginning of each investigation and were not changed throughout the procedure.
Postprocessing Image Data
Image data were read from the optical disc and transferred to a
portable personal computer (Macintosh PowerBook G3, Apple Computer).
The software used for automated color-coded analysis of the
harmonic gray-scale imaging data was written with the aid of a
public-domain graphics software tool (NIH Image 1.62, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md).
Image data postprocessing consisted of 5 steps. (1) By evaluating the
intensities of the 62 images within 1 loop, the onset and peak of
contrast enhancement can be determined. (2) From images that were
obtained before the onset of contrast enhancement, an averaged image
(background image) was calculated. (3) Next, the background image
was subtracted from the original images. (4) From various
algorithms, the following 2 yielded the most promising results and were
selected to calculate parameter images for analysis
in this study: the averaged peak image (API) and pixelwise peak
intensity (PPI). For API, an averaged image is calculated from the
series of 5 consecutive images that show the highest contrast
enhancement as defined by intensity. For PPI, the series of 5
consecutive images that show the highest contrast enhancement, as
defined by intensity, is selected. Then, in a pixel-by-pixel
evaluation, an image is calculated in which every pixel is set to the
peak intensity found within this series. (5) Finally, the background,
API, and PPI images are converted to a color scale. Gray-scale and
color images are stored on hard disk and printed on paper from an
ink-jet printer for further analysis. Except for initial
selection of the ultrasound image series, no user interaction is
required during data postprocessing. Data postprocessing is performed
in
90 seconds.
Image Analysis
Paper prints of background and parameter (API and
PPI) images were analyzed by 2 investigators. We identified
anatomic landmarks, noted the presence of artifacts, and evaluated the
homogeneity of brain perfusion. We used an arbitrary scoring system to
record whether an anatomic structure was "identified with
certainty" (score of 2), "most probably identified" (score of 1),
or "not identified" (score of 0). We sought to identify midline
structures (ie, epiphyseal gland, third ventricle, and anterior
interhemispheric fissure) and the M1 segment or main trunk of the
middle cerebral artery in the lateral fissure.
Two types of artifact were encountered: (1) low-signal sections at the anterior or posterior border of the ultrasound section, which were due to limitations of the transtemporal bone window, and (2) thin, low-signal streaks orientated from the ultrasound probe toward the midline. We noted whether these artifacts caused significant decrease of signal (score of 2), a slight decrease of signal (score of 1), or were absent (score of 0).
As shown in the Figure
, we used the
epiphyseal gland, cerebral midline, and anterior interhemispheric
fissure as anatomic landmarks to divide the ultrasound sections into
the following areas: (1) anterior territory of the ipsilateral middle
cerebral artery, (2) main territory of the ipsilateral middle
cerebral artery, (3) ipsilateral thalamus, (4) cerebellum (this
section also contains the posterior aspect of the temporal gyrus), (5)
territory of the contralateral middle cerebral artery, and (6)
contralateral thalamus. We noted whether brain perfusion led to a
clearly visible increase in signal in 50% or less of the respective
area (score of 0), in >50% of the respective area (score of 1),
or whether homogenous perfusion was noted (score of 2).
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
In 1 subject, MR images were obtained parallel to the ultrasound
section. During the ultrasound study, markers were attached to the
subjects head, which were visible on both ultrasound and MR images.
MRI studies were performed on a 0.2-T MR scanner (Siemens Magnetom
Open) using a 3D, T1-weighted fast low-angle shot sequence: repetition
time/echo time=16.1/7 ms, flip angle=30°; effective thickness=4
mm; field of view=240 mm; matrix=240x256, and 2 acquisitions. MR
images were reconstructed parallel to the anatomic markers.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perfusion
Results are detailed in the Table
.
In all 48 studies, the effects of brain perfusion were seen. On the PPI
parameter images, brain perfusion was visualized more
homogenously than on the API images (the
Figure
). The total score values for all regions were
higher for those investigations that used the PPI method compared with
the API method. The most homogeneous visualization of
perfusion was found in the area of the ipsilateral thalamus, followed
by the contralateral thalamus and the ipsilateral main territory of the
middle cerebral artery. However, visualization of perfusion of the
anterior territory of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery was
regarded as insufficient (score of 0) in 25% to 38% of hemispheres
due to ultrasound field artifacts at the edge of the insonation plane.
No significant differences were found between injections of 0.5 and 1.5
mL of Optison.
|
Artifacts
Limitations of the transtemporal bone window were
encountered in all 48 studies (the Figure
, panel
D). Low-signal areas at the anterior border of the
ultrasound section caused a significant decrease in signal (score of 2)
in 46 studies and a slight decrease in signal (score of 1) in 1 study
and were absent (score of 0) in only 1 study. Low-signal areas at the
posterior border of the ultrasound section caused a significant
decrease in signal in 29 studies and a slight decrease in signal in 8
studies and were absent in 11 studies. Thin, low-signal streaks
orientated from the ultrasound probe toward the midline were found in
44 of 48 studies (the Figure
). Thirty-one studies contained 1
thin streak artifact, 12 studies contained 2, and 1 study contained 3
of these artifacts.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Instead of displaying the area under the time-intensity curve, which is related to cerebral blood volume, we analyzed the peak intensity increase from baseline images after administration of the contrast agent. This parameter is related to the maximum amount of contrast agent in the tissue and, in a low-concentration range, showed a linear correlation to the contrast agent dose.8 As shown in the quantitative analysis of this study, we found no significant dosepeak intensity relation.4 Therefore, this parameter only indicates the presence of contrast agent in the microcirculation as a result of perfusion of this area.
To reduce the effects of motion and other artifacts, the algorithm that performed best in our study analyzed the complete loops of 62 ultrasound images, but in the end it used only a small subset of images to calculate the parameter image. If the frame rate of data acquisition is changed, it may be necessary to adjust the length of this subseries. In our study, an injection of 1.5 mL of Optison had no clear advantages over injection of 0.5 mL, as was shown in the earlier quantitative analysis of the data.4
All evaluators stated that color coding of the
parameter images greatly enhanced visualization of the
perfusion effects in an easy-to-interpret way. Because of its speed
(calculation of the images takes
90 seconds), our method makes
clinical examinations of stroke patients at the bedside more feasible.
However, in stroke patients, diagnostic reliability may be
improved by an additional parameter image that displays a
time delay in perfusion (time-to-peak image). This approach needs
further evaluation by using a higher frame rate to improve the time
resolution for this kind of parameter image.
In summary, this study indicates that it is possible to visualize echo enhancement in perfused areas of the brain through the intact skull in an easy-to-interpret way. This observation is encouraging for further studies of evaluating brain perfusion in patients with acute brain infarctions.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 18, 2000; revision received July 5, 2000; accepted July 17, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Seidel G, Greis CH, Sonne J, Kaps M. Harmonic grey scale imaging of the human brain. J Neuroimaging. 1999;9:171174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Postert T, Federlein J, Weber S, Przuntek H, Buttner
T. Second harmonic imaging in acute middle cerebral artery infarction:
preliminary results. Stroke. 1999;30:17021706.
4.
Seidel G, Algermissen C, Christoph A, Claassen L,
Vidal-Langwasser M, Katzer T. Harmonic imaging of the human brain:
visualization of brain perfusion with ultrasound. Stroke. 2000;31:151154.
5. Meairs S, Daffertshofer M, Neff W, Eschenfelder C, Hennerici M. Pulse-inversion contrast harmonic imaging: ultrasonographic assessment of cerebral perfusion. Lancet. 2000;355:550551.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Hancock J, Dittrich H, Jewitt DE, Monaghan MJ.
Evaluation of myocardial, hepatic, and renal perfusion in a variety of
clinical conditions using an intravenous ultrasound
contrast agent (Optison) and second harmonic imaging. Heart. 1999;81:636641.
7.
Porter TR, Xe F. Transient myocardial contrast after
exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute
doses of intravenously injected microbubbles: demonstration
and potential mechanisms. Circulation. 1995;92:23912395.
8. De Jong N, Hoff L, Skotland T, Bom N. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. Ultrasonics. 1992;30:95103.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Bartels and H.-J. Bittermann Transcranial Contrast Imaging of Cerebral Perfusion in Patients With Space-Occupying Intracranial Lesions J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2006; 25(4): 499 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Seidel, K. Meyer-Wiethe, G. Berdien, D. Hollstein, D. Toth, and T. Aach Ultrasound Perfusion Imaging in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction Predicts Outcome Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): 1107 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shiogai, N. Takayasu, T. Mizuno, M. Nakagawa, and H. Furuhata Comparison of Transcranial Brain Tissue Perfusion Images Between Ultraharmonic, Second Harmonic, and Power Harmonic Imaging Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 687 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wiesmann, K. Meyer, T. Albers, and G. Seidel Parametric Perfusion Imaging With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 508 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Meves, W. Wilkening, T. Thies, J. Eyding, T. Holscher, M. Finger, G. Schmid, H. Ermert, and T. Postert Comparison Between Echo Contrast Agent-Specific Imaging Modes and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Brain Perfusion Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2433 - 2437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. U. Harrer and C. Klotzsch Second Harmonic Imaging of the Human Brain: The Practicability of Coronal Insonation Planes and Alternative Perfusion Parameters Stroke, June 1, 2002; 33(6): 1530 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.B. Ringelstein Echocontrast agents in neurovascular ultrasound Eur. Heart J. Suppl., March 1, 2002; 4(suppl_C): C48 - C50. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Rim, H. Leong-Poi, J. R. Lindner, D. Couture, D. Ellegala, H. Mason, M. Durieux, N. F. Kassel, and S. Kaul Quantification of Cerebral Perfusion With "Real-Time" Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2582 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |