(Stroke. 2000;31:2670.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contribution |
From the Division of Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology (M.H.) and Department of Neurology (M.T.W.), Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (P.V., K.J.B.L.); Department of Cellular Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (C.H.M.M. de B.); and Hanse Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst/Bremen, Germany (M.H.).
Correspondence to Manfred Herrmann, MD, PhD, Division of Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail manfred.herrmann{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsWe investigated 32 patients with stroke symptoms consistent with cerebral ischemia in the anterior territory of vascular supply. Serial venous blood samples were taken after admission to the hospital and during the first 4 days after onset of stroke. Evaluation of lesion topography and volume of infarcted brain area was based on cranial CT data. The patients clinical status was consecutively evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Barthel Index score at discharge from the hospital.
ResultsProtein S-100B and GFAP release was found to be significantly correlated (r=0.96; P<0.001). The release of both biochemical markers was associated with the volume of brain lesions (S-100B: r=0.957, P<0.0001; GFAP: r=0.955, P<0.0001) and the neurological status at discharge from the hospital (S-100B: r=0.821, P=0.0002; GFAP: r=0.717, P=0.0003). The highest correlation between both S-100B and GFAP serum concentration and Barthel score was calculated at the last time of blood sampling, 4 days after stroke onset (S-100B: r=0.621, P<0.001; GFAP: r=0.655, P<0.001). The release of both astroglia derived proteins differed between different subtypes of stroke. GFAP was found to be a more sensitive marker of brain damage in patients with smaller lacunar lesions or minor strokes.
ConclusionsOur results indicate that postischemic release patterns of GFAP and S-100B protein may allow insight into the underlying pathophysiology of acute cerebral infarcts and may be used as a valuable tool of clinical stroke treatment.
Key Words: glial fibrillary acidic protein nerve tissue protein S-100 outcome stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Meanwhile, there exist a considerable number of studies investigating the release patterns of protein S-100B into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or peripheral blood after acute stroke and their association with the volume of lesion, clinical status, and functional outcome.1 2 4 5 13 14 15 Poststroke S-100B serum concentrations were reported to correlate significantly with the size of infarcted brain areas,1 4 5 and the release pattern of the brain-originated protein was interpreted to mirror the underlying pathophysiology of acute stroke5 or traumatic brain injury.16 Furthermore, several clinical studies could establish a significant association between early serum concentrations of S-100B and the clinical and/or functional outcome after stroke.4 5 15
Protein S-100B forms part of a large and diverse family of Ca2+-binding proteins predominantly found in astrocytes and Schwann cells.17 18 The biological properties of the protein are not fully understood to date, but there is evidence that S-100B modulates complex neuronal-glial interactions. A variety of experimental findings suggest both a detrimental (induction of neuronal cell death19 ) and a beneficial (induction of reactive synaptogenesis and plasticity processes20 ) potential of protein S-100B dependent on concentration and time elapsed since brain injury. Protein S-100B, however, is expressed not only in brain tissue but also in a variety of other cell types, under both physiological and pathological conditions. Expression of protein S-100B has been observed in white and brown fat, skin and skeletal muscle tissue, melanoma or glioblastoma cells,18 21 as well as in patients treated for a longer time with ß-adrenergic agonists or phosphodiesterase inhibitors.22 Although S-100B expression in the latter conditions was far below the activity measured after acute central nervous system disorders, the brain specificity of S-100B release was questioned by a number of investigators. Consequently, there was a demand for neurobiochemical markers highly specific for astroglial brain tissue, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was considered a high-priority candidate.23 GFAP is a monomeric intermediate filament protein expressed almost exclusively in astrocytes, where it represents the major part of the cytoskeleton. Several studies have shown that CSF concentrations of GFAP might be elevated in normal pressure hydrocephalus,24 dementia,25 or stroke,13 but apart from preliminary clinical data in a technical brief,26 there is no systematic study on GFAP serum concentrations in stroke or other brain disorders.
The present study aimed at a comparative analysis of GFAP and S-100B serum concentrations and release patterns in patients after acute stroke. Our main objectives were (1) to analyze the poststroke correlation of both neurobiochemical markers of glial brain tissue, (2) to evaluate the association with stroke subtype and volume of infarcted brain areas, and (3) to contrast the predictive value of both proteins with respect to the early neurological and functional outcome after acute stroke. To reach these goals we reanalyzed a subsample of a well-characterized group of patients presented in a previous study,5 with acute stroke symptoms corresponding to ischemia in the anterior territory of vascular supply.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Methods
Neurobiochemical Analysis
Venous blood samples were taken at admission (mean±SD time
after stroke onset, 8.4±5.9 hours), and at the first (20.4±6.8
hours), second (44.0±6.7 hours), third (68.1±7.6 hours), and fourth
days (92.7±8.0 hours). Blood was allowed to clot, and after
centrifugation within 30 minutes (1000g, 10
minutes), serum was stored at -78°C for later analysis.
Protein S-100B was analyzed using a commercially available
monoclonal 2-site immunoluminometric assay (Sangtec 100). The assay kit
measures the ß-subunit of the protein as defined by 3 monoclonal
antibodies (SMST 12, SMSK 25, and SMSK 28). Antibody-coated polystyrene
tubes serve as solid phase in which the coated antibody reacts with the
S-100B protein in the sample. Unbound material is removed by a washing
step. During a second incubation the tracer antibody binds to the
immobilized S-100B, and the nonreactive tracer is removed
by a second washing. The antiS-100B tracer conjugate contains a
covalently bound isoluminol derivative. For detection, the isoluminol
is oxidized by alkaline peroxide followed by light emission. The whole
procedure was performed in an automated LIA-mat System 300, with a
detection threshold below 0.02 µg/L. The range of S-100B serum
concentrations in 95% of healthy subjects is reported to be <0.12
µg/L. GFAP measurement is based on an in-house enzyme-linked
immunoassay. For each assay a microtiter plate is coated with rabbit
GFAP antibody. After a 5-fold washing cycle with phosphate buffer pH
7.4, containing 0.05% Tween 20, a blocking agent is applied. After
washing, either human GFAP antigen or serum (in duplicate) are added
and incubated for 2 hours. After washing, diluted mouse anti-human GFAP
is added and incubated for another hour. After a further washing cycle,
a diluted biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse IgG is applied and incubated
for 1 hour. After washing, a diluted peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin
solution is added and incubated for 30 minutes. After a final washing
cycle, 100 µL of a freshly prepared tetramethylbenzidine
solution is added and incubated for 15 minutes in the dark. The
reaction was stopped by adding 100 µL 2N
H2SO4, and absorbance was
read at 450 nm on an ELISA reader (Titertek ICN). The upper limit of
GFAP in serum of healthy subjects was measured at <0.3 µg/L.
Analysis of GFAP was performed at the University Hospital at Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and S-100B was measured at Magdeburg University, Magdeburg, Germany. The investigators were blinded to clinical and neuroradiological data.
Neuroradiological Assessment
All neuroradiological examinations were based on cranial CT
imaging. Scans were performed briefly after admission (mean±SD
6.0±6.3 hours after infarction) in standardized slices without
contrast enhancement and were repeated within the first week (mean
64.8±51.1 hour after infarction, n=27). Imaging data of all subjects
were analyzed using the public domain NIH Image program
(developed at the US National Institutes of Health and available via
Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image). All CTs were evaluated
with respect to lesion topography and territories of vascular supply,
and volume of lesions was calculated in all scans showing a clearly
demarcated infarct area (n=28). Neuroradiological data analysis
was performed independently by 2 members of our group, 1 of whom was
blinded to all other data. Data on reliability and interrater
agreements are given elsewhere.5
Neurological and Functional Assessment
All patients underwent a standardized neurological examination
on admission, at the first and fourth days after onset of stroke
symptoms, and at discharge from the hospital. The neurological status
was quantified (by M.T.W.) with use of the National Institutes of
Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS29 ), and the functional outcome
at discharge was rated with a modified Barthel Index score by
experienced neurologists.
Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 8.0 program package (SPSS, Inc) and the MedCalc 5.0 statistical software (MedCalc Software).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The area under curve (AUC) values of GFAP and S-100B were significantly correlated (Pearsons r=0.96, P<0.0001). Serum concentrations at the different sampling points, however, were found to be significantly correlated not before the second day after stroke (r=0.837, P<0.001; day 3: r=0.961, P<0.0001; day 4: r=0.961, P<0.0001).
In all but 4 patients, demarcated areas of brain infarction in the anterior circulation territory that corresponded to the acute stroke symptoms could be identified. The infarcts mostly involved temporal and parietal brain areas. Accordingly, they were mainly supplied by medial and posterior branches of the middle cerebral artery and the lenticulostriate arteries. Two patients exhibited anterolateral thalamic lesions in the tuberothalamic artery territory of vascular supply. Mean absolute lesion volume was calculated 34.2x103 mm3 (±72.2). Volume of lesions and serum concentrations of both proteins were significantly correlated (S-100BAUC: r=0.957, P<0.0001; GFAPAUC: r=0.955, P<0.0001). Protein S-100B values were found to significantly correlate with the volume of brain infarction, starting at the time of admission to the hospital (r=0.676, P=0.0003; day 1: r=0.940, P=0.0002; day 2: r=0.949, P=0.0002; day 3: r=0.969, P=0.0002; and day 4: r=0.892, P=0.0007). Significant correlations between GFAP serum concentration and volume of lesion could be observed beginning with the second day after stroke (r=0.799, P=0.0004; day 3: r=0.968, P=0.0003; and day 4: r=0.957, P=0.0004).
Release of Neurobiochemical Markers and Neurological and
Functional Status
With respect to all patients, NIHSS scores showed a continuous and
significant improvement between admission and discharge (Friedman test:
2=30.2, df=3, P=0.0002). Serum
concentrations of S-100B and GFAP correlated significantly with
NIHSS-scores at any time of blood sampling. The numerically highest and
most significant association was found between S-100B and GFAP AUC
values and the neurological status at discharge from the hospital
(S-100B: r=0.821, P=0.0002; GFAP:
r=0.717, P=0.0003). To obtain information on the
predictive value of both proteins, we dichotomized the NIHSS scores at
the fourth day after stroke onset (the last day of blood sampling)
according to the criteria proposed by the TOAST
investigators.30 An NIHSS score of
6 was taken as
an indicator of good recovery, whereas a score >6 was associated with
a higher probability of poor outcome. Figure 3
shows a comparison of receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) curves of S-100B and GFAP AUC values
with respect to the forecast of a good (n=19) or poor (n=13) outcome.
Areas under the ROC curves and the respective 95% confidence intervals
indicate that both proteins do have a significant predictive value
according to the separation of patients with a good or poor prognosis.
The protein S-100B AUC value was calculated slightly higher (0.798;
95% CI 0.62 to 0.92) than the respective GFAP AUC value (0.700; 95%
CI 0.51 to 0.85), but the areas under the ROC curves did not differ
significantly (P=0.351).
|
Functional outcome (Barthel score) at discharge from the hospital was significantly associated with the release of both proteins (S-100BAUC: r=0.612, P<0.001; GFAPAUC: r=0.564, P=0.001). The highest correlation between both S-100B and GFAP serum concentrations and Barthel scores was calculated at the last time of blood sampling, 4 days after stroke onset (S-100B: r=0.621, P<0.001; GFAP: r=0.655, P<0.001).
Release Patterns of S-100B and GFAP and the Clinical Course of
Stroke
Figure 2
demonstrates that the release patterns of S-100B
and GFAP depend on the size of infarcted brain area and significantly
differ in lacunar infarcts, restricted cortical infarcts, and large
anterior circulation infarcts. Figure 4
shows the release patterns of both proteins in 3 patients
representing different clinical courses after stroke.
Stroke in progression (case 1) was associated with a continuous
increase of both neurobiochemical markers peaking at the third or
fourth day after onset of stroke symptoms. Generally, GFAP peak levels
exceeded the cutoff value to a higher extent compared with the maximal
S-100B concentration. In completed stroke associated with a good
recovery (case 2), peak values were found at the second day after
stroke, followed by a continuous decrease. GFAP peak level exceeded the
cutoff value up to 15-fold, whereas S-100B serum concentrations were
found to be only slightly elevated. Patients with prolonged but fully
reversible neurological deficits without demarcated brain lesion (case
3) showed no significant S-100B release. The initial GFAP serum
concentrations, however, were found to be significantly elevated. This
increase was followed by a rapid decline during the next 3 days.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Before discussing the results in detail, we have to point out some methodological limitations. The patient group was restricted to a small but well-defined sample with acute stroke symptoms according to a cerebrovascular ischemic event in the anterior territory of vascular supply. This restriction does not allow a transfer of the results to stroke events in the posterior circulation territory. Furthermore, we analyzed only a small patient group. The data need replication with respect to both larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods. Taken into account the explorative nature of the study, we nevertheless consider the present results an interesting starting point of the clinical investigation of astrocytic response to acute cerebral ischemia.
Protein S-100B and GFAP release showed a continuous increase from admission to the fourth day after stroke when analysis is based on all patients included in the study. Previous studies that had examined consecutive S-100B levels after acute stroke consistently reported time to peak intervals between 2 and 3 days after stroke onset.2 4 5 14 A more detailed analysis of the data, however, revealed the continuous S-100B increase to be caused by patients suffering from large anterior circulation infarcts. The analysis of protein release based on a stroke subtype classification showed a more complex time course of S-100B release. Mean S-100B values of patients with small lacunar infarcts never exceeded the cutoff value of 0.12 µg/L. This finding is consistent with the results of a study by Kim and coworkers,14 who reported nonmeasurable S-100B concentrations in patients with small subcortical lesions. Patients with partial anterior circulation infarcts showed a slow increase of S-100B, which exceeded the upper limit of the reference range only 2-fold.
The temporal profile of poststroke GFAP serum concentrations was found to differ from the S-100B release patterns. In patients with lacunar infarcts, GFAP was significantly increased at the time of admission. The protein concentration slowly decreased within the observation period, and serum levels within the normal range were reached 2 days after stroke onset. GFAP concentrations in patients with partial anterior circulation infarcts remained on nearly the same level, which was found significantly increased, however, over the whole period of blood sampling. In total anterior circulation infarcts both GFAP and S-100B values showed a continuous increase, reaching peak concentrations that exceeded the cutoff values 28- and 18-fold, respectively.
Values for both GFAP and S-100B release were numerically high and significantly correlated with the size of infarcted brain areas. Significant correlations between poststroke S-100B concentrations and volume of lesions were also reported in a series of previous clinical studies on focal ischemia.1 2 4 5 15 This finding indicates that release of both proteins into peripheral blood mirrors the extent of substantial brain damage visible in CT imaging. In the present clinical study we found a highly significant correlation of protein S-100B and GFAP AUC values after stroke. Both the high S-100B values and their highly significant correlation with GFAP release give evidence that S-100B serum concentrations indeed reflect damage to astrocytes. Interestingly, an analysis of the association between serum concentrations of both proteins at the different sampling times showed that a significant intercorrelation could not be observed before the second day after stroke. The lack of a significant correlation between GFAP and S-100B at the early stage after stroke has to be attributed to the finding of relatively higher initial GFAP serum concentrations. At admission to the hospital, 39% of all patients presented GFAP serum concentrations above the cutoff value, but only 19% of all patients showed S-100B serum concentrations exceeding the respective reference range.
We found significant correlations between postischemic GFAP and S-100B release and both neurological and functional status at discharge from the hospital. The literature on the association between S-100B release and the clinical status of stroke patients is heterogeneous, a fact that can be attributed mainly to different techniques of protein analysis and a broad range of instruments applied for the assessment of the neurological status and functional outcome after stroke. Büttner and coworkers2 reported a significant association of S-100B concentrations and neurological status only at the time of admission to the hospital, whereas other investigators1 4 5 15 also found significant correlations between S-100B values and the clinical and/or functional outcome.
As far as we know, the study of Aurell and coworkers13 was the first and only systematic approach to the analysis of both astroglial proteins in stroke patients. This study, however, had no clinical influence because the technique for protein analysis allowed the detection of GFAP and S-100B only in CSF. The data obtained from CSF samples, however, were highly consistent with the results of the present study. Aurell et al assigned the higher clinical significance to the analysis of GFAP. This statement was based mainly on the higher sensitivity of GFAP in small infarcts compared with the respective predictive value of protein S-100B. The results of the present study on poststroke serum concentrations of both proteins generally confirm the data from Aurell and colleagues. The higher sensitivity of early GFAP serum concentrations is corroborated by the GFAP and S-100B release pattern in patients with minor stroke. In patients with acute signs of ischemic stroke completely reversible within a few days, the initial GFAP values were measured as highly elevated, whereas S-100B concentrations were found to be far below the threshold or not measurable in serum samples.
The difference in temporal patterns of S-100B and GFAP release may be attributed to a different molecular biology of both proteins, which also might be mirrored in different release patterns in pathological conditions such as focal ischemia. Protein S-100B forms part of a large family of EF-hand Ca2+-binding proteins, the cellular synthesis of which has been localized predominantly in astroglial and Schwann cells.17 18 The protein is involved in the differentiation of cytoskeletal structures and Ca2+-dependent cellular information processing.31 Both necrotic cell death of astrocytes (leading to a leakage of protein S-100B from cytosol to the extracellular space) and breakdown of membrane integrity in the penumbra zone of focal infarcts (due to cytotoxic and vasogenic edema) may result in a significant increase of S-100B serum concentration.2 15 Animal experiments and studies on cell cultures, however, indicate that protein S-100B not only reflects glial cell function but also modulates complex neuronal-glial interactions. Hu and coworkers19 demonstrated that S-100B treatment of astrocyte-neuron co-cultures induces neuronal cell death via a nitric oxidedependent pathway, a result that could not be replicated in the absence of astrocytes. Furthermore, astrocyte S-100B expression is also upregulated during lesion-induced sprouting and reactive synaptogenesis in adult rats.20 This finding suggests a major role of S-100B in brain repair mechanisms and plasticity. Glial fibrillary acidic protein is a 50-kDa intermediate filament protein that is expressed almost exclusively in astrocytes. The protein represents the major part of the astrocyte cytoskeleton, and it is required for the stable formation of astrocytic processes in response to neurons.32 Animal data indicate that transient33 or permanent34 suppression of cerebral blood supply, as well as photochemically induced focal cortical ischemia,35 result in a widely distributed upregulation of GFAP expression. A significant increase of GFAP immunoreactivity was observed 2 hours after reduced plasma perfusion following embolic MCA occlusion.36 The molecular biology of GFAP, however, remains largely unknown. Pekny and coworkers37 recently demonstrated that the genetic removal of GFAP is associated with an increase of the intracellular glutamine concentration. Thus, postischemic upregulation of GFAP expression may correlate with a decreased intracellular glutamine synthase activity. These data suggest a major role of GFAP in the control of the poststroke glutamine metabolism. Recent animal data also suggest an interaction between GFAP and protein S-100B. Seven days after postischemic reperfusion, Martinez and coworkers38 found only few GFAP positive cells in the rat hippocampus and cerebellum. This poor GFAP activity was interpreted as a consequence of the inhibition of GFAP polymerization by protein S-100B. GFAP depolymerization, however, seems to be part of a long-term adaptive response of astrocytes to ischemically induced metabolic alterations and neuronal death.33
We present here for the first time a comparative analysis of the postischemic release patterns of GFAP and protein S-100B in serum. Taken together, both astroglia-derived proteins showed a significant association with the morphological and clinical consequences of acute stroke. The comparative analysis of the poststroke kinetics of GFAP and S-100B may allow valuable insight into the underlying pathophysiology of acute cerebral infarcts and may possibly give a hint of potential brain repair mechanisms. The present data also suggest that the postischemic GFAP and S-100B release may be a useful tool of monitoring and evaluating therapeutic interventions such as neuroprotective drug treatment, which is expected to be a major part of future stroke treatment.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 20, 2000; revision received August 9, 2000; accepted August 9, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T Molnar, A Peterfalvi, L Szereday, G Pusch, L Szapary, S Komoly, L Bogar, and Z Illes Deficient leucocyte antisedimentation is related to post-stroke infections and outcome J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 61(11): 1209 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gee, A. Kalil, M. Thullbery, and K. J. Becker Induction of Immunologic Tolerance to Myelin Basic Protein Prevents Central Nervous System Autoimmunity and Improves Outcome After Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1575 - 1582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cordeau Jr, M. Lalancette-Hebert, Y. C. Weng, and J. Kriz Live Imaging of Neuroinflammation Reveals Sex and Estrogen Effects on Astrocyte Response to Ischemic Injury Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 935 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nylen, L. Z. Csajbok, M. Ost, A. Rashid, K. Blennow, B. Nellgard, and L. Rosengren Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Is Related to Focal Brain Injury and Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1489 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Jauch, C. Lindsell, J. Broderick, S. C. Fagan, B. C. Tilley, S. R. Levine, and for the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group Association of Serial Biochemical Markers With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2508 - 2513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. F. Laterza, V. R. Modur, D. L. Crimmins, J. V. Olander, Y. Landt, J.-M. Lee, and J. H. Ladenson Identification of Novel Brain Biomarkers Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1713 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Abdo, B.P.C. van de Warrenburg, M. Munneke, W. J.A. van Geel, B. R. Bloem, H. P.H. Kremer, and M. M. Verbeek CSF analysis differentiates multiple-system atrophy from idiopathic late-onset cerebellar ataxia Neurology, August 8, 2006; 67(3): 474 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Foerch, I Curdt, B Yan, F Dvorak, M Hermans, J Berkefeld, A Raabe, T Neumann-Haefelin, H Steinmetz, and M Sitzer Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker for intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with acute stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2006; 77(2): 181 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Allard, P. R. Burkhard, P. Lescuyer, J. A. Burgess, N. Walter, D. F. Hochstrasser, and J.-C. Sanchez PARK7 and Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase A as Plasma Markers for the Early Diagnosis of Stroke Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2043 - 2051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Foerch, O. C. Singer, T. Neumann-Haefelin, R. du Mesnil de Rochemont, H. Steinmetz, and M. Sitzer Evaluation of Serum S100B as a Surrogate Marker for Long-term Outcome and Infarct Volume in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction Arch Neurol, July 1, 2005; 62(7): 1130 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Anderson Candidate-based proteomics in the search for biomarkers of cardiovascular disease J. Physiol., February 15, 2005; 563(1): 23 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M.A.L. Pelsers, T. Hanhoff, D. Van der Voort, B. Arts, M. Peters, R. Ponds, A. Honig, W. Rudzinski, F. Spener, J. R. de Kruijk, et al. Brain- and Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins in the Brain: Tissue Distribution and Clinical Utility Clin. Chem., September 1, 2004; 50(9): 1568 - 1575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hasselblatt, F. C. Mooren, N. von Ahsen, K. Keyvani, A. Fromme, K. Schwarze-Eicker, V. Senner, and W. Paulus Serum S100{beta} increases in marathon runners reflect extracranial release rather than glial damage Neurology, May 11, 2004; 62(9): 1634 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Vos, K. J.B. Lamers, J. C.M. Hendriks, M. van Haaren, T. Beems, C. Zimmerman, W. van Geel, H. de Reus, J. Biert, and M. M. Verbeek Glial and neuronal proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury Neurology, April 27, 2004; 62(8): 1303 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Zimmermann-Ivol, P. R. Burkhard, J. Le Floch-Rohr, L. Allard, D. F. Hochstrasser, and J.-C. Sanchez Fatty Acid Binding Protein as a Serum Marker for the Early Diagnosis of Stroke: A Pilot Study Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2004; 3(1): 66 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Becker, D. Kindrick, R. McCarron, J. Hallenbeck, and R. Winn Adoptive Transfer of Myelin Basic Protein-Tolerized Splenocytes to Naive Animals Reduces Infarct Size: A Role for Lymphocytes in Ischemic Brain Injury? Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1809 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Foerch, R Du Mesnil de Rochemont, O Singer, T Neumann-Haefelin, M Buchkremer, F E Zanella, H Steinmetz, and M Sitzer S100B as a surrogate marker for successful clot lysis in hyperacute middle cerebral artery occlusion J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2003; 74(3): 322 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|