(Stroke. 2000;31:2701.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contribution |
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, and the Department of Anesthesiology (F.E.S.), Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence to Frederick E. Sieber, MD, Vice Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD 21224-2780. E-mail fsieber{at}jhmi.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsDiabetic male (MDiab, n=14) and female (FDiab, n=8) BB rats were studied and compared with background strain Wistar rats (MWist, n=16; FWist, n=14). Two additional male cohorts (MWist+E2, n=15; MDiab+E2, n=14) received subcutaneous 25 µg E2 implants 7 to 10 days before MCAO. Rats underwent 1 hour of MCAO followed by 22 hours of reperfusion. Physiological variables were controlled among groups, and the intraischemic laser Doppler flow signal was reduced similarly in all animals. Infarction volume was evaluated by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and image analysis.
ResultsPreischemic blood glucose was 94±5, 127±13, 90±15, 63±18, 122±8, and 81±14 mg/dL in MWist, FWist, MDiab, FDiab, MWist+E2, and MDiab+E2 rats, respectively (mean±SE). Intraischemic laser Doppler flow was reduced to 20% to 25% of baseline in all groups. Striatal infarct size (percentage of ipsilateral caudate putamen) was increased in male diabetic rats relative to nondiabetic MWist rats (41±3% versus 28±3%). Striatal injury was not increased in FDiab rats, and infarction volume was smaller than that in FWist rats (23±4% in FWist versus 13±3% in FDiab). Chronic estrogen treatment reduced cortical and striatal infarction in MDiab+E2 rats compared with untreated MDiab rats.
ConclusionsType 1 DM is associated with increased infarct size after temporary MCAO, despite tight control of blood glucose. The deleterious effect of DM is evident only in males rats; female diabetic BB rats sustain small infarcts. Chronic E2 treatment reduced injury in the male BB rat, providing neuroprotection even in the presence of DM. These data suggest that genetic diabetes even with mild glucose elevation plays a role in determining neuropathology in experimental stroke. However, factors such as reproductive steroids also determine outcome in DM stroke.
Key Words: brain cerebral ischemia complications diabetes mellitus estrogen ischemia middle cerebral artery stroke rats
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many studies have shown that supplementary estrogen administration is neuroprotective in stroke. Studies examining the epidemiology of DM have shown that male type 1 DM rats have a higher incidence of end-organ complications than do female rats.4 A second aim of the present study was to determine whether chronic preischemic estrogen treatment reduced infarction size in male type 1 DM rats treated with transient MCAO.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diabetic Animal Model
Studies were conducted in type 1 DM male and female BB rats
(Biobreeding Laboratories, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and in age-matched
background strain Wistar rats of both sexes. BB rats were obtained from
the supplier after
5 weeks of DM and then were housed for 1 to 3
weeks while receiving intensive insulin therapy with a goal of
maintaining blood glucose <150 mg/dL. Additional groups of male BB and
Wistar rats received subcutaneous implants of 17ß-estradiol
(E2, 25 µg)
7 to 10 days before MCAO, as
previously described.5 6 The 25-µg implant treatment was
chosen on the basis of previous efficacy in reducing stroke injury
after MCAO in male,6 female,7 and
reproductively senescent female Wistar rats.8 One week
of treatment with the implant yields a stable and
physiological level of plasma
E2 (ie, 10 to 20 pg/mL).5 6 7 8 Animals
were housed with free access to water and food, and subcutaneous
insulin was administered daily in response to blood glucose levels
obtained from tail samples.
Reversible Unilateral MCAO
Male and female rats were anesthetized with 1% to 2%
halothane delivered via face mask in oxygen-enriched air and
instrumented with femoral artery catheters for
physiological monitoring and blood gas measurement.
Rectal and temporalis muscle temperatures were controlled at
37.5±0.5°C by use of heat lamps. Cortical perfusion was measured by
laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF, Moor Instruments Ltd, model
MBF3D) as previously described, with probe placement at 2 mm
posterior and 6 mm lateral to the bregma. Unilateral focal
cerebral ischemia was accomplished by use of the intraluminal
filament model (4-0 nylon monofilament suture) of proximal MCAO. The
right common carotid artery was exposed through a lateral incision,
separated from the vagus, and ligated. The external carotid artery was
ligated, the occipital branch was cauterized, and the pterygopalatine
artery was ligated. An occluding filament was advanced via the common
carotid artery until the LDF signal displayed an abrupt and significant
reduction, confirming ongoing ischemia; it was then secured in
place. Ischemic LDF was determined over 5-minute periods
throughout the 60-minute occlusion period, and then the suture was
withdrawn with prompt restoration of blood flow. Each animal was
recovered and supported with intravenous Ringers lactate
solution and supplemental oxygen as needed. Insulin was given after
surgery to maintain plasma glucose at the target level. After 22 hours
of reperfusion, the animal was reanesthetized for harvesting of
the brain. The tissue was sliced into seven 2-mm-thick coronal sections
for 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride
staining and quantification via standard photography and digital
planimetry (SigmaScan Pro, Jandel). The infarcted area was numerically
integrated across each section and over the entire ipsilateral
hemisphere. Infarct volume was measured separately in the cortex and
caudate putamen and expressed as a volume percentage of the ipsilateral
structure.
Statistical Analysis
All values are reported as mean±SE; all
physiological variables, infarct volumes, and
residual LDF were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc
Newman-Keuls test. The relationship between preischemic
glucose and infarction was analyzed by Pearson correlation.
Statistical significance was confirmed at value of P
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Figure 2
displays infarction volumes for
the 2 brain regions damaged by 1 hour of MCAO, the cortex and caudate
putamen, as a percentage of the respective ipsilateral structure.
Cortical injury was small in all treatment groups, particularly in
diabetic females, in which no injury was present, and in female
nondiabetic Wistar rats (Figure 2
). In the striatum, injury
volumes were larger, and differences linked to diabetic strain and to
sex were apparent. Diabetic males sustained larger striatal infarction
compared with their male Wistar counterparts (Figure 2
).
Diabetes-linked exacerbation of stroke injury was sex dependent in that
female diabetic rats did not demonstrate increased striatal injury.
Furthermore, striatal infarction was surprisingly smaller in diabetic
BB than in Wistar females.
|
Figure 3
shows the effect of estrogen
treatment in male diabetic and Wistar rats compared with their
untreated male counterparts in the same strain. When untreated and
E2-treated Wistar males were compared,
E2 treatment did not alter the relatively small
damage sustained after 60 minutes of MCAO in the cortex or caudate
putamen. However, when untreated and E2-treated
male diabetic BB rats were compared, E2 clearly
produced a robust protection in both the cortex and striatum.
|
Figure 4
plots individual animal
values for preischemic plasma glucose concentration and
striatal infarction within all experimental groups. There was no strong
correlation between these variables (r=0.191), in part
because hyperglycemia was limited by the study design. Therefore, only
limited ranges of glucose were present (<200 mg/dL), and most
animals fell in the 75- to 150-mg/dL range. The correlation was not
improved by comparison by sex or estrogen treatment. Although many
females or estrogen-treated males had normal or low
preischemic glucose levels, others sustained high glucose
levels but small infarctions.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transient ischemia, whether global or focal, is associated with greater neuropathologic damage in DM hyperglycemic animals. During temporary focal ischemia, DM hyperglycemia increases infarct size.9 Similarly, with transient global ischemia, the level of DM hyperglycemia also affects the neurological outcome. In the rat forebrain ischemia model, preischemic treatment of DM hyperglycemia with insulin leads to a neurological outcome and histopathology similar to that in non-DM normoglycemic rats.10 However, untreated hyperglycemia leads to a dismal neurological and histopathologic outcome. These results agree with studies using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which suggest that the most hyperglycemic DM animals are at highest risk for poor neurological outcome.11 Similarly, in dogs, the preischemic blood glucose level is an important determinant of morbidity and neuropathologic damage after global brain ischemia in insulin-dependent animals.12 It is unclear whether the above-mentioned results represent a neuroprotective effect of insulin or a neurotoxic effect of hyperglycemia. However, they emphasize the potential importance of insulin-based blood glucose control in determining neurological outcome after transient brain ischemic insults in DM. In the present study, intensive insulin-based blood glucose management was undertaken 1 to 3 weeks before MCAO to eliminate hyperglycemic effects. We targeted blood glucose at <200 mg/dL immediately before the onset of MCAO, and preischemic glucose values were similar in the Wistar and diabetic male groups. Despite this insulin-intensive management of blood glucose, ischemic injury was greater in type 1 DM males.
Previous studies used chemical or surgically induced DM. These animal
models may not accurately reflect type 1 DM, which entails complex
genetic and immunologic interactions. In the present study, a
genetic rodent model of type 1 DM was used, simulating some complexity
of human DM. There are several reasons to suspect that DM, even with
intensive insulin-based blood glucose management, would be associated
with worsened neurological outcome after stroke. In particular, DM
alters cerebral blood flow and reactivity.3 These effects
have been observed in larger vessels and in the
microvasculature.13 Autopsy studies suggest that diabetics
are particularly prone to cerebral small-artery disease, lacunar
infarction, and large-artery atherosclerotic occlusive
disease.14 DM-induced vascular abnormalities may have
relevance to the present results with the present model of
MCAO, which would simulate this latter pathology. Although the
reduction of LDF during vascular occlusion was similar among all groups
in the study (
20% to 25% of baseline signal), absolute
intraischemic cerebral blood flow was not measured. If type 1
DM altered baseline cerebral blood flow, then differences in
intraischemic blood flow cannot be excluded and may have
influenced tissue outcome. Last, in our 1-hour MCAO model, the effect
of DM was most striking in the striatum, which contains the core of the
ischemic lesion, rather than the cortex. A moderate intensity
of ischemic duration was chosen to best ensure survivorship
within the insulin-dependent diabetic cohort. Consequently, cortical
injury levels were small in all treatment groups within the study and
may have been somewhat insensitive to the effects of genetic strain or
treatment. Alternatively, genetic diabetes may recruit potentially
salvageable tissue into the core of the lesion by compromising
collateral circulation and vasodilatory capacity during MCAO.
The present data strongly suggest that sex and estrogen availability have large influences on the outcome from stroke in the diabetic strain. Although DM exacerbates stroke damage in the male, the female is spared. Our laboratory5 and others15 16 17 have demonstrated that female animals sustain reduced tissue damage from experimental stroke; loss of endogenous reproductive steroids in females results in ischemic damage, which becomes indistinguishable from that of age-matched males. Furthermore, exogenous estrogen treatment has been widely shown to be neuroprotective in ischemic injury both in vivo and in vitro (for review, see Reference 18 ). The anti-ischemic mechanism(s) of the steroid is under heavy investigation18 ; however, both vascular5 19 20 21 and nonvascular7 22 23 sites of action have been demonstrated. Cellular mechanisms are likely multifactorial, including preservation of vascular tone and residual cerebral blood flow during cerebral ischemia,5 20 21 induction of protective gene products,24 antioxidant activity,15 25 modification of inflammatory processes,26 and reduction of glutamate excitotoxicity.27 The present data further these observations by demonstrating that genetically diabetic female rodents are also protected from ischemic damage relative to the male of the same strain and that estrogen treatment strongly protects the male diabetic brain during MCAO. Estrogen implants reduced infarction volume in the diabetic brain to levels not different from those observed in the nondiabetic brain. These findings emphasize that outcome from DM stroke, like non-DM stroke, is sex dependent. Furthermore, the deleterious effect of DM in the male brain confronted with an ischemic stress is responsive to a neuroprotectant, such as estrogen.
The importance of sex or reproductive steroids in type 1 DM end-organ complications has not been extensively studied in human or animal models. Although premenopausal nondiabetic women have lower stroke rates than age-matched males (for review, see Reference 18 ), this relationship has not been specifically studied in diabetic women. Diabetes is a known risk factor for stroke in both men and women, but most epidemiological studies have not reported sex-specific relative risks. Whether estrogen treatment alters stroke outcome in human DM is also unclear; however, data from the Framingham study show that stroke damage is greatly increased in postmenopausal diabetic versus nondiabetic women.28 Several factors in the present rodent experiments must be considered relative to the neuroprotection of estrogen. First, because preischemic plasma glucose levels were, on average, lower in DM females than in males, we cannot exclude this factor as a source of the protection enjoyed by the female. Preischemic hyperglycemia is known to increase brain damage by fueling lactic acidosis and depressing intraischemic tissue pH,12 13 29 potentially enhancing oxygen radicalmediated injury mechanisms.29 30 However, glucose levels were relatively controlled in all the BB rats for 1 to 3 weeks before MCAO. The level of hyperglycemia present in any of the animals was mild and consequently not well correlated with increased infarction for males or females. Second, the observation that striatal damage in diabetic females was less severe than in nondiabetic females could suggest an overlap of tissue mechanisms by which estrogen protects brain and DM increases stroke damage. This is the first report of sex differences in DM stroke or of the efficacy of estrogen in reducing injury in the DM male, so further studies are needed to determine cellular mechanisms of interaction. Potential interactions between estrogen and DM could involve the ability of the steroid to enhance cerebral perfusion under conditions of vascular stress,5 19 20 protect vascular endothelial integrity,19 enhance glucose transport and increase blood-brain barrier expression of the glucose transporter GLUT1,31 32 33 and decrease oxidative impairment of membrane Na+,K+-ATPase activity.34 Last, estrogen treatment did not decrease infarction volume in nondiabetic male rats, contrary to previous reports of significant efficacy in the male brain.6 34 The lack of neuroprotection is likely related to the small degree of injury produced in nondiabetic animals after a single hour of MCAO. When the duration of MCAO is extended and larger tissue volumes are compromised, chronic and acute estrogen treatment ameliorates focal injury in the nondiabetic brain.6 34
In conclusion, genetic type 1 DM negatively influences infarct size when hyperglycemia is tightly controlled. This effect is limited to the male and can be altered by estrogen availability, suggesting that these factors be considered in further studies of DM stroke. Vascular and parenchymal mechanisms by which DM enhances stroke damage require further investigation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 7, 2000; revision received August 7, 2000; accepted August 8, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Department of Internal Medicine Cardiovascular Division University of Iowa College of Medicine Iowa City, Iowa
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results suggest that type 1 diabetes is associated with increased infarct size, even with relatively good control of plasma glucose levels. This increase in brain injury in response to ischemia was seen in males and could be reduced by 17ß-estradiol. Thus, these findings support the concept that estrogen is neuroprotective. In contrast to the results in males, females rats with diabetes did not have increased infarct size following ischemia.
At the present time, it is unclear what mechanism(s) produce gender-specific increases in brain injury following ischemia during diabetes. What are some possibilities? There are several levels at which one might hypothesize that diabetes could exacerbate brain injury following ischemia. These include diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction and reductions in blood flow, increases in production of reactive oxygen species (or reductions in effectiveness of antioxidant mechanisms), or reprogramming of gene expression such that subsequent injury in response to ischemia is enhanced.
Although it is fairly well established that estrogen has neuroprotective effects in cerebral ischemia, the present work provides new evidence that this protective effect extends to the setting of diabetes. The mechanisms that account for neuroprotection during diabetes also remain to be defined.
Received April 7, 2000; revision received August 7, 2000; accepted August 8, 2000.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Singh, J. A. Dykens, and J. W. Simpkins Novel Mechanisms for Estrogen-Induced Neuroprotection. Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2006; 231(5): 514 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Hurn, S. J. Vannucci, and H. Hagberg Adult or Perinatal Brain Injury: Does Sex Matter? Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 193 - 195. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Simpkins, S.-H. Yang, R. Liu, E. Perez, Z. Y. Cai, D. F. Covey, and P. S. Green Estrogen-Like Compounds for Ischemic Neuroprotection Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11_suppl_1): 2648 - 2651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Becker, M. L. Weisfeldt, M. H. Weil, T. Budinger, J. Carrico, K. Kern, G. Nichol, I. Shechter, R. Traystman, C. Webb, et al. The PULSE Initiative: Scientific Priorities and Strategic Planning for Resuscitation Research and Life Saving Therapies Circulation, May 28, 2002; 105(21): 2562 - 2570. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |