Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2000;31:3041-3046

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossberg, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Kontos, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossberg, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Kontos, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism
Right arrow Pathology of Stroke
Right arrow Neuroprotectors

(Stroke. 2000;31:3041.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

LY353381.HCl, a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, and Experimental Stroke

Mark I. Rossberg, MD; Stephanie J. Murphy, VMD, PhD; Richard J. Traystman, PhD Patricia D. Hurn, PhD

From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence to Patricia D. Hurn, PhD, Blalock 1404, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail phurn{at}jhmi.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
down arrowIntroduction 
 
Background and Purpose—The impact of postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy on stroke prevention and stroke severity remains controversial. Previously we have shown that cerebral tissue infarction volume sustained after middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion is smaller in female than in male animals. This protection is lost after ovariectomy but is restored by 17ß-estradiol replacement. However, the therapeutic range for estradiol is suboptimal, since only doses resulting in a narrow range of plasma levels are protective in brain. The present study tested the hypothesis that a benzothiophene analogue and selective estrogen receptor modulator, LY353381.HCl (LY), reduces tissue infarction after MCA occlusion in estrogen-deficient, ovariectomized female rats.

Methods—Ovariectomized female Wistar rats received LY 10 mg/kg (n=16) or an equivalent volume of vehicle (n=14) by gavage for 5 to 8 days. Subsequently, each animal was anesthetized with halothane (1.2%) and treated with 2 hours of MCA occlusion by the intraluminal filament technique and 22 hours of recovery. Infarction volumes in the cerebral cortex and caudoputamen were determined by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and digital image analysis. End-ischemic regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured in separate animal cohorts by quantitative [14C]iodoantipyrine autoradiography.

Results—Caudoputamen infarction was reduced by LY treatment (49±6% versus 64±4% of ipsilateral caudoputamen in LY and vehicle groups, respectively; P<0.05). Cerebral cortical infarction was not different in the LY compared with vehicle group (7±3% versus 13±4% of ipsilateral cerebral cortex, respectively). Intra-ischemic blood pressure, arterial blood gases, and temporalis muscle temperature were controlled and equivalent between treatment groups. Averaged laser-Doppler flow during MCA occlusion was 36±3% of baseline in the LY group versus 29%±2% in the vehicle group. However, end-ischemic CBF or blood flow distribution within the MCA territory was not altered by LY treatment. Cortical or caudoputamen tissue volumes with end-ischemic CBF <20 mL/100 g per minute were similar in both groups.

Conclusions—We conclude that LY confers neuroprotection from focal cerebral ischemia in caudoputamen in ovariectomized female rats. The mechanism of protection is not linked to preservation of ischemic cerebral blood flow, as determined by end-occlusion quantitative autoradiography.


Key Words: cerebral infarction • cerebral ischemia, focal • estrogens • hormones • stroke • women


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
down arrowIntroduction 
 
Cerebrovascular disease and stroke rates increase significantly in women after menopause.1 Although there is strong evidence that estrogen replacement therapy reduces postmenopausal risk of cardiovascular disease2 and osteoporosis,3 4 the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on stroke risk and outcome is unproven.5 6 7 8 9 There is an abundance of evidence for estrogen-derived neuroprotection in animal and in vitro models of experimental stroke.10 11 12 13 14 15 The steroid likely acts through multiple cellular mechanisms, including preservation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and vasodilatory capacity, as well as through direct neuronal protection.16 We and others have demonstrated extensive reduction of stroke damage by 17ß-estradiol treatment in male,17 ovariectomized female,18 19 20 21 22 23 and reproductively senescent rats.24 In female animals, the therapeutic range for estradiol was suboptimal in that a narrow range of plasma levels was useful in reducing ischemic injury.19 Furthermore, estradiol replacement has not consistently resulted in protection equivalent to that observed in reproductively active females with cyclic endogenous steroid production.

A real concern for women who hesitate to begin estrogen replacement therapy, but who have known stroke risk factors, is the link of estrogen to increased risk of thromboembolism25 and breast26 27 and endometrial cancer.28 29 30 Additionally, while the risk of endometrial cancer can be reduced by coadministration of progestin with estrogen, it is unclear whether combined therapy alters the efficacy of estrogen in cardiovascular disease or stroke. Thus, the development of a new class of drugs, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), has been pursued to enhance estrogen agonist activity in the cardiovascular system and in bone, while causing either antagonist or no effect in breast and endometrium. LY353381.HCl (LY), or 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-[4-[2-(1-piperidinylethoxy]phenoxy]benzo[b]thiophene-6-ol hydrochloride, is a novel benzothiophene analogue with structure and in vivo SERM activity that is similar but not identical to raloxifene (for structural modifications, see References 31 and 32 ). It prevents ovariectomy-associated weight gain, serum cholesterol elevation, and bone mineral loss, while it preserves estrogen antagonist effects on the uterus. This new SERM is of interest because of its enhanced potency relative to previously studied nonsteroidal template compounds, its excellent oral bioavailability, and its penetration into brain.31 32 The purpose of this study was to determine potential neuroprotective effects of LY in experimental middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion in ovariectomized female rats. Additionally, we measured regional CBF during MCA occlusion to assess potential effects on preservation of intraischemic CBF.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
down arrowIntroduction 
 
This study was conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of animals in research; all protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Johns Hopkins University. All procedures are as previously published.18 Sexually mature, female Wistar rats (aged 8 to 12 weeks; 200 to 300 g body wt) underwent aseptic bilateral surgical ovariectomy under halothane anesthesia 1 week before their randomization into 1 of 2 treatment groups (LY 10 mg/kg suspension or vehicle). The primary investigator was blinded to treatment group assignments. Rats were treated for 5 to 8 days with daily oral gavage administration (volume 0.5 mL/100 g body wt). To facilitate atraumatic drug delivery, rats were anesthetized with a brief stun dose of 5% halothane in an oxygen/air mixture. Vehicle contained purified water, 0.085% wt/vol povidone, 0.28% wt/vol polysorbate 80, and 1.506% anhydrous granular lactose.

Focal cerebral ischemia was accomplished by modification of the intraluminal filament method for proximal MCA occlusion.18 In brief, each animal was anesthetized with halothane (5% induction, then 1% to 1.5%) via nose cone with supplemental oxygen and air. A femoral artery was cannulated for blood pressure monitoring and arterial blood gas sampling. Rectal and temporalis muscle temperatures were measured and controlled with use of a heating lamp. The rat was placed on a stereotaxic frame equipped with a snout mask, a laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) probe holder, and a modification to allow for rotation about the longitudinal axis of the rat. An area 2 to 3 mm in diameter was thinned in the right parietal bone 2 mm posterior and 6 mm lateral to bregma for LDF (model MBF3D, Moore Instruments, Ltd). The LDF probe was positioned in its cranial window for semicontinuous measurements during vascular occlusion and the first 15 minutes of reperfusion. The right common carotid artery was exposed via a lateral neck incision, separated from the vagus nerve, and ligated. The external carotid artery was ligated, the occipital branch was cauterized, and the pterygopalatine artery was exposed and ligated. A 4-0 monofilament surgical suture with a heat-rounded tip was advanced through the common carotid artery and advanced into the internal carotid artery until an abrupt reduction in LDF signal was observed. The filament was secured in place. LDF was recorded at 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes of MCA occlusion. Then the suture was withdrawn to initiate reperfusion, which was confirmed by LDF. Wounds were closed, and the animal was awakened. At 22 hours of reperfusion, the rat was reanesthetized with halothane, and the brain was harvested and sliced into seven 2-mm-thick coronal sections for 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Infarction volumes were measured with the use of digital photography and image analysis software (SigmaScan Pro, Jandel). The infarcted area was numerically integrated across each section and over the entire ipsilateral hemisphere. Cortical and caudoputamen infarction was analyzed as a percentage of the volume of that ipsilateral cortex and caudoputamen, respectively.

End-ischemic regional CBF was measured in additional cohorts of Wistar rats that did not survive by quantitative autoradiography with [14C]iodoantipyrine (IAP), as described previously.18 Femoral vascular catheters were placed, and the MCA was occluded as in the previous cohorts. At 2 hours of MCA occlusion, arterial blood pressure and blood gases were measured, then 40 µCi of [14C]IAP (New England Nuclear) in 0.8 mL of isotonic saline was infused intravenously over 45 seconds. During infusion, fifteen 10-µL samples of free-flowing arterial blood from the femoral artery catheter were collected in heparin-coated sample tubes. With the filament still in place and LDF confirming the ischemic status, the rat was decapitated 45 seconds after the start of infusion. One postdecapitation arterial blood sample was collected. The brain was quickly removed and frozen at -50°C in 2-methylbutane on dry ice. Each brain was sectioned by cryostat into 20-µm-thick coronal sections at -20°C and thaw-mounted onto cover glasses. For 1 week, sections and 14C standards were apposed to film (Kodak, Bio-Max MR). The concentrations of [14C]IAP in blood samples was determined by liquid scintillation spectroscopy (model 3801, Beckman) after decolorization with 0.2 mL of tissue solubilizer (Soluene-350, Packard Instruments Co). Autoradiographic images representing 5 different coronal levels (+2.2, +0.2, -1.8, -3.8, and -5.8 mm from bregma, 6 to 9 images each) were digitized, and regional CBF was determined with the use of image analysis software (Inquiry, Loats Associates). Rates of regional CBF were calculated as previously described.18 24

Two methods of analysis were used to evaluate end-ischemic CBF within MCA territory ipsilateral and contralateral to occlusion. First, CBF was measured by sampling 0.08-mm2 squares within gray matter of those regions most vulnerable to MCA occlusion, the frontal and parietal lobes of cerebral cortex and the medial and lateral aspects of caudoputamen. Flow rates were then averaged from squares assayed from 6 to 9 consecutive brain slices at each of 3 coronal levels (+2.2, +0.2, and -1.8 mm from bregma). In the second method, areas categorized by predetermined intervals of CBF were isolated by digital image scanning and summed to construct a histogram distribution of brain tissue over incremental ranges of CBF. Areas were averaged from 3 images from each of 5 coronal levels (+2.2, +0.2, -1.8, -3.8, -5.8 mm from bregma) and then were numerically integrated to obtain an estimate of tissue volume for each incremental range of CBF.

All values are reported as mean±SE. Physiological parameters and LDF over the ischemic and early reperfusion interval were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA. When there was a significant effect of group, post hoc comparisons were made between groups at each time point with 1-way ANOVA and subsequent Newman-Keuls test. Differences in infarct size, mean residual laser-Doppler flow, and autoradiographic regional CBF among groups were determined with 1-way ANOVA. The criterion for statistical significance was P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
down arrowIntroduction 
 
Oral gavage feedings were tolerated over 7 days with no loss of body weight. LY treatment did not alter body weight compared with vehicle (data not shown). Physiological data in animals treated with MCA occlusion are summarized in the TableDown. Mean arterial pressure, arterial blood gas, blood glucose, and hemoglobin concentration were similar between groups during MCA occlusion and early reperfusion. Figure 1Down shows cortical and caudoputamen infarction volumes as percentages of the ipsilateral cerebral cortex and caudoputamen, respectively, for LY- (n=16) and vehicle-treated (n=14) rats. Infarction volume in caudoputamen was smaller in LY- than in vehicle-treated rats (49±6% versus 64% ±4% of ipsilateral caudoputamen, respectively). Cortical injury was not different between groups (7±3% in LY- versus 13±4% in vehicle-treated rats). In all animals, intraischemic cortical LDF signal was sharply reduced during MCA occlusion, then stabilized at approximately 25% to 35% of baseline signal through occlusion (Figure 2Down). There were no differences between LDF over the ischemia/reperfusion period between the 2 treatment groups (P=0.09), nor was there an interaction between time and treatment group. When LDF during occlusion was examined independently of reperfusion, only the 90-minute time point was significantly different between treatment groups (P=0.03). Averaged LDF over the entire 2 hours of occlusion was 36±3% in LY- and 29±2% of baseline signal in vehicle-treated rats.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of Physiological Variables



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Caudoputamen and cortical infarction volume expressed as a percentage of the ipsilateral structure in LY- (n=16) or vehicle-treated (n=14) ovariectomized female rats. All values are mean±SE. *P<0.05.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Intraocclusion LDF expressed as a percentage of baseline signal in LY- (n=16) or vehicle-treated (n=14) ovariectomized female rats. All values are mean±SE. *P<0.05 vs vehicle-treated group. MCAO indicates MCA occlusion.

To evaluate cortical and subcortical perfusion during MCA occlusion, absolute CBF and blood flow distribution within the MCA territory were quantified in an additional animal cohort (LY, n=4; vehicle, n=3). End-ischemic regional CBF in frontal and parietal cortex was not different in LY- and vehicle-treated groups (Figure 3Down). Blood flow to medial and lateral sections of caudoputamen was also similar in both treatment groups. Furthermore, when brain volume was partitioned into blood flow increments throughout the ischemic hemisphere, there was no difference in blood flow distribution during vascular occlusion (Figure 4Down). LY treatment did not alter the distribution of tissue volume into low flow zones (eg, <20 mL/100 g per minute), which represent the infarct core.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. CBF within the distribution of the MCA (ischemic ipsilateral and contralateral cortex and caudoputamen) in LY- or vehicle-treated ovariectomized female rats. All values are mean±SE.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Tissue volume distribution partitioned into blood flow increments in LY- or vehicle-treated ovariectomized female rats. All values are mean±SE.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
down arrowIntroduction 
 
The results of this study demonstrate 2 important findings. First, preischemic treatment with LY conferred neuroprotection from MCA occlusion in caudoputamen. Second, the mechanism of protection is not linked to preservation of regional CBF during vascular occlusion, as assessed by end-occlusion quantitative autoradiography. Cortical and caudoputamen tissue volumes with severely ischemic flow rates (<10 to 20 mL/100 g per minute) were not decreased by drug treatment, suggesting that LY did not recruit tissue from core infarction zones into the vascular penumbra. These data suggest that this novel class of SERM may be efficacious in reducing histological damage from focal cerebral ischemia when given as a pretreatment. Optimization of dose response and of treatment duration will be required in future studies to fully evaluate the efficacy of LY in experimental stroke.

SERMs represent a new class of compounds that possess tissue-specific estrogen receptor binding and elicit agonist or antagonist effects in different target tissues.33 34 The precise mechanisms by which SERMs such as tamoxifen or raloxifene act as estrogenic versus antiestrogenic molecules are actively under investigation and unclear at present. Various compounds within the class differ by relative binding affinity for known estrogen receptor subtypes ({alpha} versus ß) and by chemical structure, which determines the unique conformation of receptor/ligand complex.35 Putative molecular mechanisms by which a SERM acts as an estrogen agonist include interaction with coactivator proteins within DNA transcription complexes, engagement of alternative docking sites within estrogen response elements in genes, or differential binding to the ß receptor subtype.36 37 38 In rats, LY is an orally active benzothiophene compound that potently prevents ovariectomy-induced effects on body weight, serum cholesterol, and bone density. It is effective in bone mineral preservation, serum cholesterol reduction, and reduction of atherosclerotic pathology, while it maintains estrogen antagonist activity in uterus.31 32 To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate a potential neuroprotective effect of a SERM in cerebral ischemia.

Our present finding of reduced infarction volume limited to caudoputamen in LY-treated animals differs from the protection we have previously observed with 17ß-estradiol in this same model. Chronic pretreatment with 17ß-estradiol at physiologically relevant doses reduces damage to cortex as well as caudoputamen in both young ovariectomized19 and reproductively senescent24 female rats. This regional difference may be related to true differences in neuroprotective potential of the 2 agents or may be a function of a less than optimal dosing regimen for LY. The optimal dose of LY for either agonist or antagonist activity within the central nervous system is not known. Our rationale for dose (10 mg/kg daily) and route (by gavage) was based on previous work demonstrating potency and efficacy in other responsive targets such as uterus31 and bone.32 The regionally restricted efficacy of LY to caudoputamen versus cortex may also be a reflection of the small amount of cortical damage exhibited in animals regardless of treatment assignment. Because damage was small in cortex relative to caudoputamen, treatment effects would be difficult to demonstrate even with the reasonably robust animal cohort size used in this study (n=14 to 16 per group). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that LY interacts differently with available estrogen receptor subtypes in cortex relative to 17ß-estradiol. Both {alpha} and ß estrogen receptor subtypes have been identified in rat cortex.39

We investigated effects of LY on CBF in the contralateral, nonischemic, and ipsilateral hemispheres to determine whether the compound enhanced regional perfusion. Contralateral blood flow was unchanged by chronic LY treatment compared with vehicle, suggesting a lack of basal CBF augmentation under conditions of halothane anesthesia. Both absolute CBF and CBF distribution were also similar in vehicle- and drug-treated animals, demonstrating that mitigation of intraischemic blood flow defects was not a primary mechanism by which LY reduced injury. This finding is similar to our previous observations with 17ß-estradiol in this ischemic model, in which exogenous estrogen appears to exert flow-independent neuroprotection.19 It should be noted that these data during MCA occlusion do not exclude possible CBF enhancement during reperfusion. Nevertheless, the present results indicate that for an equivalent reduction of CBF during vascular occlusion, LY was efficacious in salvaging tissue within the caudoputamen at 24 hours after MCA occlusion.

Whether SERMs act directly on neurons or glia to provide ischemic protection is not known. It seems likely that multiple mechanisms are engaged, in much the same manner as 17ß-estradiol is hypothesized to act in neuroinjury. Accumulating evidence implicates estrogen receptor-independent antioxidant properties and free radical scavenging,40 receptor-dependent reduction of calcium current inflow,41 inhibition of glutamate and N-methyl-D-aspartate toxicity,42 43 44 and preservation of protective gene products such as bcl-2.45 46 Recent studies suggest that the neuroprotection of estrogen in experimental stroke is not mediated via estrogen subtype {alpha} receptors.47 The importance of the ß subtype in neuronal survival has been suggested and is under active investigation.48

In summary, we have demonstrated that pretreatment with LY reduces caudoputamen infarction volume at 24 hours in a standard model of MCA occlusion in ovariectomized female rats. The protection is not dependent on augmentation of ischemic CBF and enhanced vasodilation during vascular occlusion. However, effects on recovery of CBF during reperfusion cannot be excluded. Further study is warranted to explore the potential clinical utility of LY in neuroinjury and to more fully elucidate its mechanisms of cerebral protection.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by US Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health grants NS20020, NS33668, and NR03521. LY353381.HCl was a generous gift from Eli Lilly and Company. The authors extend their gratitude to Percy Smith, Judy Klaus, and Amanda Shaivitz for their technical support of this study.

Received May 16, 2000; revision received August 9, 2000; accepted August 18, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
down arrowIntroduction 
 
1. Wenger NK, Speroff L, Packard B. Cardiovascular health and disease in women. N Engl J Med.. 1993;329:247–256.[Free Full Text]

2. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Joffe M, Rosner B, Fuchs C, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and mortality. N Engl J Med.. 1997;336:1769–1775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Weiss NS, Ure CL, Ballard JH, Williams AR, Daling JR. Decreased risk of fractures of the hip and lower forearm with postmenopausal use of estrogen. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:1195–1198.[Abstract]

4. Quigley ME, Martin PL, Burnier AM, Brooks P. Estrogen therapy arrests bone loss in elderly women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1516–1523.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Barrett-Connor E. Hormone replacement therapy. BMJ.. 1998;317:457–461.[Free Full Text]

6. Wilson PWF, Garrison RJ, Castelli W. Postmenopausal estrogen use, cigarette smoking, and cardiovascular morbidity in women over 50. N Engl J Med.. 1985;313:1038–1043.[Abstract]

7. Finucane FF, Madans JH, Bush TL, Wolf PH, Kleinman JC. Decreased risk of stroke among postmenopausal hormone users. Arch Intern Med.. 1993;153:73–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, Henderson BE. Postmenopausal oestrogen treatment and stroke: a prospective study. BMJ.. 1988;297:519–522.

9. Petitti DB, Sidney S, Quesenberry CP Jr, Bernstein A. Ischemic stroke and use of estrogen and estrogen/progestogen as hormone replacement therapy. Stroke.. 1998;29:23–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Farhat MY, Lavigne MC, Ramwell PW. The vascular protective effects of estrogen. FASEB J. 1996;10:615–624.[Abstract]

11. Farhat MY, Abi-Younes S, Ramwell PW. Non-genomic effects of estrogen and the vessel wall. Biochem Pharmacol.. 1996;51:571–576.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Estrogen and the blood vessel wall. Curr Opin Cardiol.. 1994;9:619–626.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Hall ED, Pazara KE, Linesman KL. Sex differences in postischemic neuronal necrosis in gerbils. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab.. 1991;11:292–298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Mermelstein PF, Becker JB, Surmeier DJ. Estradiol reduces calcium currents in rat neostriatal neurons via a membrane receptor. J Neurosci.. 1996;16:595–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Woolley CS, McEwen BS. Estradiol mediates fluctuation in hippocampal synapse density during the estrous cycle in the adult rat. J Neurosci.. 1992;12:2549–2554.[Abstract]

16. Hurn PD, Macrae IM. Estrogen as a neuroprotectant in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:631–652.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Toung TJK, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Estrogen-mediated neuroprotection after experimental stroke in male rats. Stroke. 1998;29:1666–1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Alkayed NJ, Harukuni I, Kimes AS, London ED, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Gender-linked brain injury in experimental stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:159–166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Rusa R, Alkayed NJ, Traystman RJ, Klaus JA, Kimes AS, London ED, Crain BJ, Hurn PD. Estrogen replacement therapy is protective in experimental stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:1665–1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Wang Q, Santizo R, Baughman VL, Pelligrino DA, Iadecola C. Estrogen provides neuroprotection in transient forebrain ischemia through perfusion-independent mechanisms in rats. Stroke. 1999;30:630–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Dubal DB, Kashon ML, Pettigrew LC, Ren JM, Finkelstein SP, Rau SW, Wise PM. Estradiol protects against ischemic injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18:1253–1258.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Zhang YQ, Shi J, Rajakumar G, Day AL, Simpkins JW. Effects of gender and estradiol treatment in focal brain ischemia. Brain Res. 1998;784:321–324.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Simpkins JW, Rajakumar G, Zhang YQ, Simpkins CE, Greenwald D, Yu CJ, Bodor N, Day AL. Estrogens may reduce mortality and ischemic damage caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion in the female rat. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:724–730.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Alkayed NJ, Murphy SJ, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Neuroprotective effects of female gonadal steroids in reproductively senescent female rats. Stroke. 2000;31:161–168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Hoibraaten E, Abdelnoor M, Sandset PM. Hormone replacement therapy with estradiol and risk of venous thromboembolism: a population-based case-control study. Thromb Haemost. 1999;82:1218–1221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Schairer C, Lubin J, Troisi R, Sturgeon S, Brinton L, Hoover R. Menopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2000;283:485–491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy. Lancet. 1997;350:1047–1059.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Smith DC, Prentice R, Thompson DJ, Herrmann WL. Association of exogenous estrogen and endometrial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:1164–1167.[Abstract]

29. Ziel HK, Finkle WD. Increased risk of endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:1167–1170.[Abstract]

30. Bjorn I, Backsrom T. Drug related negative side-effects is a common reason for poor compliance in hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1999;32:77–86.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Sato M, Turner CH, Wang T, Adrian MD, Rowley E, Bryant HU. LY353381.HCl: a novel raloxifene analog with improved SERM potency and efficacy in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;287:1–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Sato M, Zeng GQ, Rowley E, Turner CH. LY353381.HCl: an improved benzothiophene analog with bone efficacy complementary to parathyroid hormone-(1–34). Endocrinology. 1998;139:4642–4651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Mitlak BH, Cohen FJ. Selective estrogen receptor modulators: a look ahead. Drugs. 1999;57:653–663.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Roe EB, Chiu KM, Arnaud CD. Selective estrogen receptor modulators and postmenopausal health. Adv Intern Med. 2000;45:259–278.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Wijayaratne AL, Nagel SC, Paige LA, Christensen DJ, Norris JD, Fowlkes DM, McDonnell DP. Comparative analyses of mechanistic differences among antiestrogens. Endocrinology. 1999;140:5828–5840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Brzozowski AM, Pike ACW, Dauter A, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Engstrom O, Ohman L, Greene GL, Gustafsson JA, Carlquist M. Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature. 1997;389:753–757.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Pike ACW, Brzozowski AM, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Thorsell AG, Engstrom O, Ljunggren J, Gustafsson JA, Carlquist M. Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor beta in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist. EMBO J. 1999;18:4608–4618.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Jordan VC. Designer estrogens. Sci Am. 1998;279:60–67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Shughrue PJ, Lane MV, Merchenthaler I. Comparative distribution of estrogen receptor-{alpha} and -ß mRNA in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 1997;388:507–525.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Culmsee C, Vedder H, Ravati A, Junker V, Otto D, Ahlemeyer B, Kreig JC, Krieglstein J. Neuroprotection by estrogens in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia and in cultured neurons: evidence for a receptor-independent antioxidative mechanism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:1263–1269.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Mermelstein PG, Becker JB, Surmeier DJ. Estradiol reduces calcium currents in rat neostriatal neurons via a membrane receptor. J Neurosci. 1996;16:595–604.

42. Chen J, Adachi N, Liu K, Arai T. The effects of 17beta-estradiol on ischemia-induced neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampus. Neuroscience. 1998;87:817–822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Goodman Y, Bruce AJ, Cheng B, Mattson MP. Estrogens attenuate and corticosterone exacerbates excitotoxicity, oxidative injury, and amyloid beta-peptide toxicity in hippocampal neurons. J Neurochem. 1996;66:1836–1844.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Weaver CE Jr, Park-Chung M, Gibbs TT, Farb DH. 17beta-Estradiol protects against NMDA-induced excitotoxicity by direct inhibition of NMDA receptors. Brain Res. 1997;761:338–341.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Dubal DB, Shughrue PJ, Wilson ME, Merchanthaler I, Wise PM. Estradiol modulates bcl-2 in cerebral ischemia: a potential role for estrogen receptors. J Neurosci. 1999;19:6385–6393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Alkayed NJ, McCune SK, Crain BJ, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Estrogen-enhanced expression of bcl-2 in rat brain after experimental stroke. FASEB J. 1998;12:A954. Abstract.

47. Sampei K, Goto S, Alkayed NJ, Crain BJ, Korach KS, Traystman RJ, Demas GE, Nelson RJ, Hurn PD. Stroke in estrogen receptor-{alpha}–deficient mice. Stroke. 2000;31:738–743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Hall JM, McDonnell DP. The estrogen receptor ß-isoform (ERß) of the human estrogen receptor modulates ER{alpha} transcriptional activity and is a key regulator of the cellular response to estrogens and antiestrogens. Endocrinology. 1999;140:5566–5578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Editorial Comment

Hermes A. Kontos, MD, PhD, Guest Editor

Office of the Vice President for Health Sciences Medical College of Virginia Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia


*    Introduction 
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowReferences
*Introduction 
 
Because estrogen has significant neuroprotective effects in experimental stroke, there is considerable interest in its use to diminish the incidence of stroke and limit its severity. Estrogen also potentially increases the risk of thromboembolism and of carcinoma of the breast and endometrium. These potential side effects may be avoided by using selective estrogen receptor modulators. These drugs enhance estrogen agonist activity in the cardiovascular system and in bone, but they do not have the adverse effects on breast and endometrium that estrogen itself has.

The article by Rossberg and colleagues examined the effect of a selective estrogen receptor modulator, LY353381, in experimental ischemic stroke. The authors found that this experimental drug decreased infarct size in the caudoputamen but did not reduce infarct size in the cerebral cortex. This effect differs from that of estrogen, which in earlier experiments reduced infarct size in both locations.

It is not known whether this represents a less-potent effect of LY353381 than estrogen or whether this is the result of the experimental conditions. It should be noted that the percentage reduction of the infarct size in the cerebral cortex was not significant, although numerically it was greater than that in the caudoputamen (50% versus 23%, respectively). The absence of statistical significance might be related to the fact that infarct size in this model in the cerebral cortex is small: 13%, versus 64% in the caudoputamen). Also, a single dose of the drug was used, which may not have been optimal.

Accordingly, although these initial results are encouraging, additional work is necessary, using different doses of the drug and also probably testing it in different models of ischemic stroke.

Received May 16, 2000; revision received August 9, 2000; accepted August 18, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. C. Carroll, E. R. Rosario, L. Chang, F. Z. Stanczyk, S. Oddo, F. M. LaFerla, and C. J. Pike
Progesterone and Estrogen Regulate Alzheimer-Like Neuropathology in Female 3xTg-AD Mice
J. Neurosci., November 28, 2007; 27(48): 13357 - 13365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. L. Turgeon, M. C. Carr, P. M. Maki, M. E. Mendelsohn, and P. M. Wise
Complex Actions of Sex Steroids in Adipose Tissue, the Cardiovascular System, and Brain: Insights from Basic Science and Clinical Studies
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2006; 27(6): 575 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. A. Schreihofer, K. D. Do, and A. M. Schreihofer
High-soy diet decreases infarct size after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in female rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): R103 - R108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. M. Dhandapani, F. M. Wade, V. B. Mahesh, and D. W. Brann
Astrocyte-Derived Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Mediates the Neuroprotective Effects of 17{beta}-Estradiol: Involvement of Nonclassical Genomic Signaling Pathways
Endocrinology, June 1, 2005; 146(6): 2749 - 2759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. M. Dhandapani and D. W. Brann
Protective Effects of Estrogen and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators in the Brain
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2002; 67(5): 1379 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossberg, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Kontos, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossberg, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Kontos, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism
Right arrow Pathology of Stroke
Right arrow Neuroprotectors