| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2000;31:370.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (D.T., M.J.G., S.R.L.) and Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology (L.R.S.), Henry Ford Health Science Center, Detroit, Mich; Department of Neurology, Dent Neurological Institute, Buffalo, NY (V.E.B.); Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia (S.E.K.); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor (P.S.); Department of Neurology, Seton-Hall University, East Orange, NJ (P.V.); Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (J.R.B.); and Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (J.M.D.).
Correspondence to David Tanne, MD, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel. E-mail tanne{at}post.tau.ac.il
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80 years
treated with tPA.
MethodsPatients aged
80 years (n=30) were compared with
counterparts aged <80 years (n=159) included in the tPA Stroke Survey,
a US retrospective survey of 189 consecutive AIS patients treated with
intravenous tPA at 13 hospitals.
ResultsRisk of intracerebral hemorrhage
(fatal, symptomatic, and total) was 3%, 3%, and 7% in
the elderly age group and 2%, 6%, and 9%, respectively, in their
younger counterparts (P=NS for all comparisons).
Likelihood of favorable outcome, defined as modified Rankin score 0 to
1, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score
5, or marked
improvement by hospital discharge, was comparable between groups (37%,
54%, and 43% versus 30%, 54%, and 43%, respectively;
P=NS for all comparisons). Elderly patients were more
likely to be treated by stroke specialists (87% versus 60%;
P=0.005) and less likely to have an identified protocol
deviation (13% versus 33%; P=0.03). Elderly patients
were discharged more often to nursing care facilities (17% versus 5%;
P=0.003). In logistic regression models there were no
differences in odds ratio for favorable or poor outcome, other than
tendency for higher in-hospital mortality in elderly patients (odds
ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.81 to 9.62; P=0.10).
ConclusionsAmong AIS patients treated with
intravenous tPA, age-related differences in characteristics
and disposition were identified. No evidence for withholding tPA
treatment for AIS in appropriately selected patients aged
80 years
was identified.
Key Words: cerebral ischemia elderly stroke thrombolytic therapy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80 years are, however, often excluded or underrepresented
in clinical trials for AIS.7 8 9
Intravenous tissue plasminogen
activator (tPA) administered within 3 hours of symptom
onset is a proven effective therapy for AIS.10 11 12 Few
data are available on its use in the very old. The purpose of this
study was to compare the characteristics, complications, and
in-hospital outcome of AIS patients aged
80 years treated with
intravenous tPA with their younger counterparts in a series
of patients treated in routine clinical practice.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Investigators at each hospital reviewed records of consecutive patients treated with tPA after the publication of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rtPA Stroke Trial results10 and up to no later than December 1997. Sources of information for data extraction included prehospital emergency medical services, emergency department, radiology, and inpatient medical records. Patient demographics, medical history, stroke severity, CT scans, adherence to the NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial protocol, complications attributable to tPA, and in-hospital outcome were evaluated. A standardized form was used to systematically collect data.
Three measures of patient outcome and clinical course at
discharge were assessed. Pretreatment and discharge National Institutes
of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores,14 measuring
neurological impairment, were reported categorically in 5-point
intervals (
5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, 16 to 20, or >20), similar to the
categorization in the NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial.15 The
modified Rankin Scale was used to assess disability at discharge
categorized as no significant disability (score 0 to 1), mild to
moderate disability but able to walk (score 2 to 3), and moderate to
severe disability and unable to walk (score 4 to 5).16
Both NIHSS and the modified Rankin Scale categories were estimated by
the local investigators from the medical records, unless available
as part of the routine treatment protocol.17 18 Finally,
the local investigator also determined a subjective assessment of the
in-hospital clinical course for each patient. This categorized the
clinical course from presentation to discharge as
in-hospital death, deteriorated, stable (no change), mildly improved,
or markedly improved.
Treating physicians were categorized into stroke specialists versus other physicians (neurologists, emergency physicians, or others) by each local investigator. The definition used to determine a stroke specialist was participation in a fellowship training and/or devotion of the majority of clinical practice to stroke. Each local investigator retrospectively determined deviations from NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial treatment protocol guidelines.10 12 Protocol deviations were not assessed in a blinded fashion. Severe strokes or early ischemic changes on brain CT, not exclusion criteria in the NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial, were not regarded as deviations in this survey.
A central study neuroradiologist, using NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial criteria,15 reviewed any CT scans considered to have an intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), including hemorrhagic infarction, parenchymal hematoma, and intraventricular or subarachnoid hemorrhage. ICH within 36 hours of tPA infusion was considered related to tPA administration.10 Symptomatic ICH was defined as a CT-documented hemorrhage that was judged to be temporally related to deterioration in the patients clinical condition, while fatal ICH was defined as a CT-documented hemorrhage associated with an in-hospital death. Asymptomatic ICH was defined as CT-documented hemorrhage identified on a routine follow-up without associated clinical deterioration.
Patients were stratified into 2 age groups:
80 and <80 years.
Baseline characteristics, complications, and in-hospital outcome were
compared between groups.
Statistical Analysis
Univariate comparisons were conducted with the
Fisher exact test or the
2 test for
dichotomous variables, Wilcoxon rank sum test for ordered
categorical variables, and Students t test for
normally distributed variables. Logistic regression models were
performed to assess the role of age
80 years on outcome
variables. Those variables differing between the age groups at
the P<0.20 critical level in the univariate
analyses were included in the logistic regression models.
Baseline stroke severity, a major predictor of outcome, was also
included in the logistic regression model. All statistical
analyses were performed with SAS version 6.12
software.19
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80 years (n=30) and their
counterparts aged <80 years (n=159) are shown in Table 1
|
Treating physicians were stroke specialists in 87% of elderly versus
60% of younger patients (P=0.005). The NINDS rtPA Stroke
Trial inclusion/exclusion criteria were followed with greater accuracy
in the elderly, with only 13% of treated elderly patients identified
with a protocol deviation compared with 33% in younger patients
(P=0.03). Specific deviations are summarized in Table 2
.
|
In-Hospital Complications and Outcome
In-hospital outcomes and dispositions are summarized in the
Figure
. Proportion of favorable outcome
at hospital discharge (modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1) did not
differ between groups (37% elderly versus 30% of younger patients;
P=0.52). At discharge, NIHSS scores
5 were noted in 54%
and marked improvement in 43% of both groups (P>0.99 for
both). Elderly patients were less frequently discharged home compared
with those aged <80 years (20% versus 46%, respectively) and were
more often discharged to long-term nursing care facilities (17% versus
5%, respectively; P=0.003). Proportions of poor outcome
(modified Rankin Scale score 4 to 5), severe residual neurological
deficit (NIHSS score
11), and deterioration from baseline were
similar in both groups of patients. Median length of hospital stay was
9 days (range, 3 to 26 days) in elderly patients compared with 10 days
in their younger counterparts (range, 1 to 84 days;
P=0.91).
|
Risk of symptomatic, fatal, or total ICH did not
differ between patients aged
80 years and their younger counterparts
(Table 2
). Total ICH risk was 7% in patients aged
80 years
and 9% in those aged <80 years. Risks, however, were not equally
distributed between patients aged <80 years and increased from as low
as 3% in patients aged <60 years to 14% and 15% in patients aged 60
to 70 and 70 to 80 years, respectively.
Mortality during the initial hospitalization was 2.5-fold higher among
the elderly than among younger patients (20% versus 8%;
P=0.04), with underlying causes of deaths summarized in
Table 2
. All patients dying in-hospital had premorbid repeated
brain imaging to determine whether they developed an ICH.
Odds ratios for different outcome measures were calculated after
adjustment for group differences in baseline characteristics and for
baseline stroke severity, a major determinant of outcome (Table 3
). The elderly had an
approximately 3-fold (adjusted) increased risk of dying, although this
difference did not reach statistical significance (95% CI, 0.81 to
9.62; P=0.10). No significant differences between groups
were identified for reaching other outcome measures.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
65 years is
projected to increase from 39 million in 1995 to 69 million, or
20% of the total population, in 2030. The fastest growing age group
will be the population aged
85 years, doubling its 1995 size of 3.6
million by 2025 and increasing 5-fold to 18.2 million individuals by
2050. Currently, men reaching 80 years of age can expect to live an
additional 7 years, while women average an additional 9
years.6
Stroke primarily affects an elderly population.1 2 3 4 Data
from Rochester, Minn, demonstrated that more than half of the strokes
in this population affected subjects aged
75 years and nearly one
quarter affected subjects aged
85 years.1 Furthermore,
elderly stroke patients are reported in population-based and
hospital-based studies to have more severe strokes, the case-fatality
rate is higher, and a larger proportion are discharged to long-term
institutional care20 21 22 23 24
ICH Related to tPA
The main determinants of ICH in the NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial were
stroke severity (as measured by the NIHSS) and early CT
ischemic changes.15 Increasing age was not an
independent predictor of symptomatic ICH in the NINDS rtPA
Stroke Trial but emerged as a predictor for parenchymal
hemorrhage in post hoc analysis in the European
Cooperative Acute Stroke Study.25
Several factors may theoretically increase the risk of ICH in
elderly patients with AIS, including cerebral amyloid
angiopathy,26 27 frail vasculature, and impaired rate of
tPA clearance.28 These theoretical factors may partly
explain why patients aged
80 years are often excluded or
underrepresented in experimental therapy clinical stroke
protocols. An age effect on risk of ICH was observed in our cohort aged
<80 years, but the rate of ICH was not higher in those aged
80
years. These findings, although clearly preliminary, suggest no
substantial excess risk from tPA therapy in selected patients aged
80
years. However, particular caution was exercised in selection of
elderly patients for treatment in our cohort. Furthermore, treating
physicians were more often stroke specialists, and the NINDS rtPA
Stroke Trial inclusion/exclusion criteria were followed with greater
accuracy in the elderly. Therefore, these findings should not be
generalized to all elderly AIS patients in any circumstances.
In-Hospital Outcome
A trend for higher mortality was observed among elderly AIS
patients treated with tPA in the present survey (adjusted odds
ratio, 2.8; P=0.10). A large body of evidence has shown
higher mortality rates in elderly AIS patients not treated with
tPA.20 21 22 23 24 The increased mortality among elderly
stroke patients was not explained by a higher risk of
symptomatic ICH. Elderly stroke patients were also less
likely to go home and more likely to be sent to nursing homes. The
reasons for the higher risk of mortality and disposition to long-term
nursing facilities in elderly stroke patients are not entirely clear.
Higher immediate poststroke disability, patients preferences, lack of
social support, and level of care provided may play a contributory
role.
Proportions of favorable outcome and marked improvement were similar in the elderly and younger stroke patients, suggesting that beneficial effect from tPA may be of similar magnitude in elderly AIS patients. Indeed, no threshold value for age was identified in subgroup analysis of the NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial that precludes tPA treatment.29
Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction in
the Elderly
Thrombolytic therapy was consistently found to
be beneficial in elderly patients with acute myocardial
infarction,30 31 32 although this patient group was also
associated with higher mortality and higher rates of
ICH.30 31 32 33 34 35 ICH occurred in 0.4% of patients aged <65
years, 1.2% of those aged 65 to 74 years, and 2.1% of those aged
75
years in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction
2.35 Thrombolytic therapy was shown, on the
basis of major myocardial infarction trials, to be cost-effective in
the elderly, in addition to having clear net
benefits.36 37
Study Limitations
Analyses are derived from a retrospective survey and
are thus limited by such methodology. In the absence of randomized
trials specifically targeting elderly patients for AIS, observational
data can, however, supplement our knowledge. The decision of whether to
recommend tPA was at the discretion of the evaluating physician at each
center. This potentially introduced bias, resulting in the selection of
less severely ill elderly patients. Therefore, these results should not
be generalized to elderly patients with severe strokes, severe
comorbidities, or poor prestroke functional status. Furthermore,
because of the limited sample size of elderly patients (mostly
octogenarians) and the absence of long-term follow-up, the results
should be confirmed in larger prospective studies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest that the
potential risks and benefits from intravenous tPA use in
carefully selected elderly patients aged
80 years are of a magnitude
comparable to those in younger stroke patients. Clinical decision
making regarding treatment of elderly patients sustaining an AIS is
complex and is likely to be influenced by medical comorbidities,
patients preferences, and ethical and economic considerations. The
option of this therapy, however, should not be categorically denied for
appropriately selected elderly patients solely on the basis of their
age, and such patients should be considered for treatment in future
clinical trials.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coordinators at Henry Ford Hospital and Health Science Center: D. Tanne, MD; S. Daley, RN; H.H. Mansbach, MD; L. Salowich-Palm, RN; L.R. Schultz, PhD; S.C. Patel, MD; L. DOlhaberriague, MD, PhD; S. R. Levine, MD (current address: Wayne State University Stroke Center, Detroit, Mich).
Received July 27, 1999; revision received November 8, 1999; accepted November 8, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Meseguer, J. Labreuche, J. M. Olivot, H. Abboud, P. C. Lavallee, O. Simon, L. Cabrejo, A. Echeverria, I. F. Klein, M. Mazighi, et al. Determinants of outcome and safety of intravenous rt-PA therapy in the very old: a clinical registry study and systematic review Age Ageing, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 107 - 111. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Uyttenboogaart, E. M. C. Schrijvers, P. C. Vroomen, J. De Keyser, and G.-J. Luijckx Routine thrombolysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischaemic stroke patients aged 80 years or older: a single centre experience Age Ageing, September 1, 2007; 36(5): 577 - 579. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P A Ringleb, C. Schwark, M Kohrmann, S Kulkens, E Juttler, W Hacke, and P D Schellinger Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in octogenarians: selection by magnetic resonance imaging improves safety but does not improve outcome J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 78(7): 690 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kobayashi, M. Skowronska, T. Litwin, and A. Czlonkowska Lack of experience of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke does not influence the proportion of patients treated Emerg. Med. J., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 96 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Aleu, P. Mellado, C. Lichy, M. Kohrmann, and P. D. Schellinger Hemorrhagic Complications After Off-Label Thrombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 417 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kim, G.A. Ford, C.S. Kidwell, S. Starkman, F. Vinuela, G.R. Duckwiler, R. Jahan, J.L. Saver, and for the UCLA Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis Investiga Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Stroke in Patients 80 and Older: A Comparison of Results in Patients Younger than 80 Years AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 159 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Engelter, L. H. Bonati, and P. A. Lyrer Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients of >=80 versus <80 years of age--a systematic review across cohort studies. Age Ageing, November 1, 2006; 35(6): 572 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P N Sylaja, R. Cote, A. M Buchan, M. D Hill, and on behalf of Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effecti Thrombolysis in patients older than 80 years with acute ischaemic stroke: Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2006; 77(7): 826 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R J van Oostenbrugge, R M M Hupperts, and J Lodder Thrombolysis for acute stroke with special emphasis on the very old: experience from a single Dutch centre. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 77(3): 375 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Bateman, H. C. Schumacher, B. Boden-Albala, M. F. Berman, J.P. Mohr, R. L. Sacco, and J. Pile-Spellman Factors Associated With In-Hospital Mortality After Administration of Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1999 to 2002 Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 440 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Hemphill III and P. Lyden Stroke thrombolysis in the elderly: Risk or benefit? Neurology, December 13, 2005; 65(11): 1690 - 1691. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Engelter, M. Reichhart, L. Sekoranja, D. Georgiadis, A. Baumann, B. Weder, F. Muller, R. Luthy, M. Arnold, P. Michel, et al. Thrombolysis in stroke patients aged 80 years and older: Swiss survey of IV thrombolysis Neurology, December 13, 2005; 65(11): 1795 - 1798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Berrouschot, J. Rother, J. Glahn, T. Kucinski, J. Fiehler, and G. Thomalla Outcome and Severe Hemorrhagic Complications of Intravenous Thrombolysis With Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Very Old (>=80 Years) Stroke Patients Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2421 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M S Mouradian, A Senthilselvan, G Jickling, J A McCombe, D J Emery, N Dean, and A Shuaib Intravenous rt-PA for acute stroke: comparing its effectiveness in younger and older patients J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 76(9): 1234 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Wojner-Alexandrov, A. V. Alexandrov, D. Rodriguez, D. Persse, and J. C. Grotta Houston Paramedic and Emergency Stroke Treatment and Outcomes Study (HoPSTO) Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1512 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. U. Heuschmann, P. L. Kolominsky-Rabas, J. Roether, B. Misselwitz, K. Lowitzsch, J. Heidrich, P. Hermanek, C. Leffmann, M. Sitzer, M. Biegler, et al. Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolytic Therapy JAMA, October 20, 2004; 292(15): 1831 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Hart, S. Palacio, and L. A. Pearce Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke, and Acute Antithrombotic Therapy: Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Stroke, November 1, 2002; 33(11): 2722 - 2727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Bravata, N. Kim, J. Concato, H. M. Krumholz, and L. M. Brass Thrombolysis for Acute Stroke in Routine Clinical Practice Arch Intern Med, September 23, 2002; 162(17): 1994 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Linfante, R. H. Llinas, M. Selim, C. Chaves, S. Kumar, R. A. Parker, L. R. Caplan, and G. Schlaug Clinical and Vascular Outcome in Internal Carotid Artery Versus Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions After Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 2066 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Taylor, G. D. Hughes, and R. J. Garrison Cardiovascular Disease Among Women Residing in Rural America: Epidemiology, Explanations, and Challenges Am J Public Health, April 1, 2002; 92(4): 548 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Demchuk, D. Tanne, M. D. Hill, S. E. Kasner, S. Hanson, M. Grond, and S. R. Levine Predictors of good outcome after intravenous tPA for acute ischemic stroke Neurology, August 14, 2001; 57(3): 474 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Gladstone and S. E. Black Update on intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute stroke: from clinical trials to clinical practice Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2001; 165(3): 311 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Reed, S. C. Cramer, D. K. Blough, K. Meyer, J. G. Jarvik, and D. Z. Wang Treatment With Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Inpatient Mortality Rates for Patients With Ischemic Stroke Treated in Community Hospitals Editorial Comment Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1832 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Barber, J. Zhang, A. M. Demchuk, M. D. Hill, and A. M. Buchan Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy?: An analysis of patient eligibility Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1015 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||