(Stroke. 2000;31:508.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital de Bicêtre (AP-HP), Le Kremlin Bicetre (P.D.); Institut de Médecine Aérospatiale du Service de Santé des Armées, Département de Physiologie Aérospatiale, Bretigny (G.F., L.T.); Unité de Recherches Cérébrovasculaires, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UPR 646), Faculté de Médecine Villemin, UFR Lariboisière-Saint Louis, Paris VII, Paris (Y.R.T.D., J.S.); and Département de Pharmacologie, Faculté de Médecine Paris Sud Université Paris XI, Le Kremlin Bicetre (J-F.G.), France.
Correspondence to Pierre Démolis, MD, PhD, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital de Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre Cédex, France.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsThe effect of ACZ injection on cerebral blood flow (CBF) autoregulation was tested in anesthetized rats. A pilot experiment evaluated the dose-effect relationship of injected ACZ, cumulative doses (n=4, group 1), and independent bolus doses (n=6, group 2). CBF was estimated by laser-Doppler flowmetry, and cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) was calculated from mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and from CBF (expressed as a percentage of baseline CBF). A bolus of ACZ of 21 mg/kg produced the maximal cerebral vasodilation that could be obtained by ACZ administration. In the main experiment, MABP was lowered from 110 to 20 mm Hg by stepwise bleeding in 3 groups of 6 animals treated 10 minutes before bleeding by injection of saline (group 3), 7 mg/kg ACZ (group 4), or 21 mg/kg ACZ (group 5).
ResultsThe CVR-MABP relationship was linear in all groups, indicating that CBF autoregulation was still effective after ACZ administration.
ConclusionsThese results indicate that maximal ACZ-induced cerebral vasodilation is not quantitatively equivalent to maximal autoregulatory vasodilating capacity in anesthetized rats.
Key Words: acetazolamide autoregulation cerebral blood flow hypotension rats
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main study investigated the effects of ACZ administration (a low dose of 7 mg/kg and the maximal dose obtained from the pilot study, ie, 21 mg/kg) compared with saline injection on cerebral autoregulatory vasodilation.
Preparation of Animals
The experiments were performed on 28 male Sprague-Dawley rats
(weight, 270 to 460 g). Principles of laboratory animal care (EEC
Guideline 86/609/EEC) were followed as well as specific French laws
(décret of October 19, 1987, and arrêté of October
29, 1990). Furthermore, this study was performed under license
No. 92007 delivered by the French Ministry of Defense.
Rats were anesthetized with halothane in an
O2/N2 mixture (4% on
induction, progressively reduced to 1% for the surgery) and
-chloralose (40 mg/kg SC). Rectal temperature was maintained at
37°C to 38°C throughout the experiment with a thermostatically
control blanket. All skin incisions were infiltrated with 2% lidocaine
hydrochloride. First, a polyethylene catheter (ID, 0.58 mm; OD,
0.96 mm) was advanced into the abdominal aorta from the site of
cannulation in the femoral artery. This catheter was used to induce a
decrease in MABP by bleeding. Second, a femoral vein was cannulated
(ID, 0.58 mm; OD, 0.96 mm) to perform intravenous
injections. Third, a polyethylene catheter (ID, 0.38 mm; OD,
0.76 mm) was introduced into a brachial artery for MABP
recordings (Statham transducer) and blood gas analysis
(PaO2,
PaCO2, and pHa). Heparin was given
intravenously to ensure patency of the catheters (6 IU/h).
The rats were then tracheotomized and artificially ventilated to keep
PaO2 and
PaCO2 within
physiological ranges.
The rats were positioned in a Kopf stereotaxic frame, and
the skull surface was drilled to translucency unilaterally over the
frontoparietal cortex so that the pial vessels were visible. The probe
(tip diameter of 0.8 mm with 3 optical fibers, 1 light emitter,
and 2 collectors, interaxis distance of 0.5 mm) of the
laser-Doppler flowmeter (LDF monitor, Moor Instruments England) was
carefully positioned to avoid major cerebral vessels. Halothane was
reduced to 0.5% to 0.2%, and
-chloralose was given hourly (20
mg/kg SC) until the end of the experiment.
After stabilization of CBF and MABP, an arterial blood gas analysis was performed. The reactivity of cerebral arterioles investigated by the laser-Doppler flowmeter was then tested by making the animals breathe an O2/N2 mixture (45%/45%) enriched with 10% CO2. Reactivity to CO2 was expressed as the percentage of increase in CBF induced by a 1-mm Hg increase in PaCO2.
Experimental Protocol
The experiments started approximately 2 hours after the
beginning of anesthesia and 5 minutes after the end of the
hypercapnic test.
Pilot Study
In the first part of the pilot study, the animals (group 1, n=4)
received increasing bolus doses of ACZ at 10-minute intervals: 7 mg/kg
ACZ, 14 mg/kg ACZ, and 21 mg/kg ACZ. Since the effects of injected ACZ
on CBF are sustained (at least 60 minutes in rats),1 we
considered that the doses administered were cumulative, and thus the
rats successively received 7 mg/kg ACZ, 21 (ie, 14+7) mg/kg ACZ, and 42
(ie, 21+21) mg/kg ACZ. The choice of a 10-minute interval was based on
the fact that continuous monitoring revealed in our model that the CBF
response to ACZ is maximal and stable after 7 to 8 minutes (Figure 1
).
|
In the second part of the pilot study, the rats (group 2, n=6) received a bolus injection of 42 mg/kg ACZ, and hematocrit was measured before and 10 minutes after ACZ injection. Finally, the animals inhaled an O2/N2 mixture (46.5%/46.5%) enriched with 7% CO2, and CBF was again determined. In this experiment the proportion of CO2 was limited to 7% to avoid any risk of excessive vasodilation and consecutive lethal increase in intracranial pressure due to the summation of the vasodilating effects of ACZ and CO2.
At the end of this pilot study, and on the basis of the results
obtained (Table 1
, Results), the 21 mg/kg
ACZ bolus was considered to produce the maximal cerebral vasodilation
that could be obtained by ACZ injection in this model.
|
Main Study
Three groups of rats were studied in the main experiment. In
group 3 (n=6), saline (0.5 mL IV) was given to the rats. In group 4
(n=6), a low dose of ACZ was administered (7 mg/kg IV). The animals of
group 5 (n=6) were injected with ACZ 21 mg/kg IV.
PaO2, PaCO2, and pHa were measured 10 minutes after the injection of saline or ACZ. MABP was then decreased stepwise by blood withdrawal from the arterial femoral catheter. A stable blood pressure was maintained for 1 minute after each 10-mm Hg reduction. CBF was measured during the last 30 seconds to allow autoregulatory mechanisms to be effective at each MABP level.9 MABP was reduced to 20 mm Hg, which is below the lower limit of CBF autoregulation (40 to 60 mm Hg), to ensure that the maximum of autoregulatory vasodilatation was reached. Blood was then reinfused, and the rats were killed by barbiturate injection.
Measurements and Statistical Analysis
Because CBF estimated with laser-Doppler
flowmetry correlates better with relative changes in CBF rather
than with absolute values,10 changes were calculated as
percentages of baseline CBF (CBF0), the
mean flow obtained during the minute before the injection of either
saline or ACZ. Each animal was characterized by its CBF/MABP
relationship. CVR was calculated as the ratio of MABP to concomitant
CBF, and the CVR/MABP relationship of each rat was studied. The
CVR/MABP relationship was taken as an index of autoregulatory capacity.
It should be kept in mind that laser-Doppler flowmetry does
not measure actual volumetric blood flows and thus does not allow the
calculation of absolute CVR. Nevertheless, we have used throughout this
report the classic terms of CBF and CVR to mean relative changes in CBF
and CVR, respectively.
Results are expressed as mean±SD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In the pilot experiment, intragroup and intergroup comparisons resulted from distribution-free rank sign tests, paired and unpaired, respectively. In the main experiment, intergroup comparisons were performed by an ANOVA followed by a 2-sided protected least significant difference test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To take into account the initial difference in MABP between groups 1 and 2, the intergroup comparison of changes in MABP and CVR was performed on the relative variations. It revealed that a single bolus injection of ACZ of 42 mg/kg (group 2) induced a relative decrease in CVR (-44.7±3.0%) similar to those produced by the cumulative doses of 21 and 42 mg/kg, ie, -43.0±3.9% and -43.8±5.5%, respectively. Subsequently, inhaled CO2 induced a further and significant decrease in CVR (-55.7±6.4%; P<0.01 versus pre-CO2 value). Finally, hematocrit was not modified by ACZ at 42 mg/kg (40.0±5.6% before versus 40.1±5.8% after injection, ie, a mean change of -0.07±1.77%) (P=NS).
Main Study: Control Data
The mean values of the physiological
variables during the minute preceding the injection are given in
Table 2
for the 3 groups. There was no
statistically significant difference between the groups.
|
Effects of ACZ Injection on CBF, MABP, CVR, and Blood Gas
Analysis
ACZ injection elicited an increase in CBF in groups 4 and 5
(Figure 1
). In these 2 groups, the elevation in CBF was
significant by 1 minute after the injection and reached a
plateau 10 minutes after the injection. The rise in CBF increased with
increasing doses of ACZ. ACZ injection induced a minor decrease in
MABP, and this effect occurred 5 minutes after injection. The
concomitant changes in CBF and MABP resulted in a decrease in CVR that
was significant 1 minute after injection and that plateaued 10 minutes
after injection. The reduction in CVR was greater in group 5 than in
group 4. The injection of 21 mg/kg ACZ also induced an increase in
PaCO2 (Table 2
) and a decrease
in pHa. The lowest dose of ACZ had a significant effect only on pHa
(Table 2
). The injection of saline (group 3) had no
statistically significant effect on any of the variables
studied.
Effects of ACZ on Autoregulatory Capacity
Figure 2
illustrates data obtained
from each animal and pooled in each group. Interindividual variability
of the lower limit of CBF autoregulation makes this limit less obvious
on such a graph. The CBF values for MABP <40 mm Hg are, however,
significantly lower (P<0.05) than values corresponding to
higher values of MABP. Nevertheless, after ACZ injection, CBF and CVR
at low MABPs were always significantly higher and lower, respectively,
than CBF and CVR measured in the control group, except when MABP was
maintained at its lowest level, ie, under the lower limit of CBF
autoregulation. The CVR/MABP was fitted to a linear model
(P<0.001) in each animal. Thus, the slope of the
relationship was statistically different from zero, showing a decrease
in CVR when MABP was reduced with all the injections made before
bleeding.
|
The range of the correlation coefficient and the mean slope for each
group are given in Table 3
. A tight
linear CVR/MABP relationship was found because the correlation
coefficient was always >0.8. Conversely, the mean slope of the
CVR/MABP curve was lowered after administration of 21 mg/kg ACZ
compared with the control group.
|
Interestingly, the mean CVR measured 10 minutes after an injection of 21 mg/kg ACZ (0.64±0.07 mm Hg/% CBF0) was greater than the minimal CVR obtained by bleeding below the lower limit of CBF autoregulation in the control group (ie, at a MABP of 21±1 mm Hg, CVR=0.31±0.06 mm Hg/% CBF0).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ACZ is a competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase, and its effects on CBF are probably explained by variations in the pH of the perivascular tissues.11 This putative mechanism appears to be similar to that of the cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2.12 Changes in PaCO2 affect CVR since an increase in PaCO2 results in an increase in CBF. This parallelism between ACZ and CO2 effects is confirmed by a recent report13 that suggests a link between ACZ and CO2 reactivities in humans.
In contrast, there is no strong evidence allowing the assimilation of decreases in CVR induced by ACZ or CO2 to autoregulatory vasodilation. Furthermore, some studies have demonstrated that, under specific conditions, CO2 reactivity and autoregulatory vasodilation do not vary in parallel. Nemoto et al14 demonstrated that during postischemic cerebral hypoperfusion in dogs, CO2 reactivity was abolished and autoregulation was present. Lundaar et al7 established that, during cardiopulmonary bypass in 5 patients, CO2 reactivity was preserved, whereas there was no evidence of cerebral autoregulation. Florence et al15 demonstrated in anesthetized rabbits that spreading depression reversibly impairs cerebral autoregulatory vasodilation but, in contrast, induces a long-lasting decrease in the cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2. In contrast, other reports suggest that CO2 interacts with autoregulation, which can even be exhausted during hypercapnia.16 Okudaira et al8 established a correlation between ACZ reactivity and autoregulatory vasodilation in patients during a carotid balloon occlusion test. The parallelism between these 2 vasodilatory responses may only reflect the fact that they both result in a cerebral vasodilation. Certainly, it does not definitively demonstrate that they are similar.
The question as to whether or not the vasodilatory effect of ACZ injection is quantitatively similar to autoregulatory vasodilation can only be solved by comparing the maximal decrease in CVR obtained after ACZ injection with the maximal decrease in CVR obtained by bleeding and by the study of the effects of ACZ on autoregulatory vasodilation capacity. These objectives can be met by using simultaneous direct assessments of CVR variations. If the largest cerebral vasodilating effect of ACZ does not exhaust the autoregulatory vasodilation, this necessarily means that the 2 maximal vasodilations are not quantitatively equivalent.
Laser-Doppler flowmetry allows rapid, instantaneous measurements of blood flow variations by measuring red cell flux. Since results can vary with hematocrit changes, in the pilot study we monitored the absence of any significant short-term effect of ACZ on hematocrit. Intergroup comparisons of CBF variations are thus valid with respect to this parameter.
In our study, blood pressure was modified by bleeding.
Arterial bleeding induces hypovolemia,
hypocapnia, and alkalosis,9 but it produces
rapid and controlled hypotension. Anesthesia obtained by
-chloralose plus halothane allows studies of the cerebrovascular
reactivity inasmuch as its effects on this reactivity are only
transient.17
When compared with saline (group 3), both doses of ACZ produced a
slight hypotension and the classically described decrease in
CVR.2 It appeared from continuous monitoring that, in our
model, ACZ effects on CBF or CVR plateaued 7 to 8 minutes after the
injection (Figure 1
). We thus chose to start measurements 10
minutes after ACZ injection. This time is similar to that observed by
Kawata et al in rats,5 slightly shorter than that of 10 to
15 minutes measured by Bickler et al in rabbits,12 and
slightly shorter than that of 10 to 20 minutes measured by Postiglione
et al in rats.1 The effects of ACZ on
PaCO2 and pHa are well
known11 and probably explain in part the mechanism by
which ACZ affects CVR.
One major finding of our study is that a dose of 7 mg/kg of ACZ does not produce a maximal decrease in CVR. A dose of 21 mg/kg results in a greater (1.5-fold) effect on CBF and CVR and does not further decrease blood pressure. The results of our pilot study also established that injection of 42 mg/kg ACZ (cumulative or bolus doses) did not produce significantly larger effects than 21 mg/kg.
The CVR/MABP relationship during blood withdrawal describes the
autoregulatory capacity. In the case of a nonautoregulated cerebral
circulation, blood pressure variations induce proportional changes in
CBF, with CVR remaining unchanged. Under these conditions, the CVR/MABP
relationship would appear as a straight horizontal line. In contrast,
perfect autoregulation will ideally result in a straight linear
CVR/MABP relationship with a slope that significantly differs from zero
and that reflects the autoregulatory capacity. In our animals, CBF is
expressed as a percentage of baseline flow. If it remains unchanged,
its value is thus by definition 100%. In the case of a perfectly
efficient autoregulation, the CVR/MABP relationship is described by a
line with a slope of 1/100, ie, 0.01. The slope of the CVR/blood
pressure obtained from the autoregulation testing in the control group
(Table 3
) is 0.0084±0.0019 and does not significantly differ
from the "theoretical" slope of 0.01.
Another important point is that the minimal values of CVR obtained after the injection of both doses of ACZ and before bleeding (0.80±0.15 and 0.64±0.07 mm Hg/% CBF0, groups 4 and 5, respectively) are not as low as the CVR measured after lowering blood pressure under the limit of CBF autoregulation in controls (0.31±0.06 mm Hg/% CBF0 at a MABP of 21±1 mm Hg). This comparison is limited by the fact that it does not take into account the variations of intracranial pressure. This pressure may increase after ACZ-induced cerebral vasodilation, leading to an overestimation of CVR, especially before bleeding. At the lowest MABP values, maximal autoregulatory vasodilation probably makes this intergroup difference negligible.
Carbonic anhydrase inhibition produced by ACZ is reversible and thus surmountable. ACZ-induced accumulation of CO2 is probably limited compared with that obtained by CO2 inhalation, as is the resulting increase in CBF. This hypothesis was confirmed by the results of our pilot study showing that a 7% CO2 inhalation resulted in a further cerebral vasodilation in rats that were given a maximal vasodilating dose of ACZ.
ACZ injection thus appears to limit the efficiency of the autoregulatory process inasmuch as, after both doses, CBF slightly decreased during blood withdrawal. Nevertheless, even after the maximal dose of 21 mg/kg, ACZ administration did not exhaust the cortical autoregulation. The main effect of ACZ, a dose-dependent decrease in the CVR/MABP slope, is probably nonspecific and due to the cerebral vasodilating properties of ACZ that impair the ability of the cerebral arterioles to further dilate. This may explain the correlation found between autoregulatory capacity and ACZ effects in humans.8
In summary, the effect of ACZ injection on CVR is not maximal at doses as low as 7 mg/kg in rats. Even the maximal ACZ-induced decrease in CVR obtained with the 21-mg/kg dose does not suppress CBF autoregulation. The CBF reactivities to ACZ injection and to hypotension are quantitatively different since exhausting the former does not suppress the latter, probably because ACZ does not produce maximal acidosis. The decreased CVR/MABP slope after ACZ administration is probably only a nonspecific consequence of the vasodilating properties of the drug. This demonstrates that the maximal vasodilating effect of ACZ (classically designed as the "cerebral vasodilatory reserve") is not an accurate index of maximal autoregulatory capacity. Assessments of CBF autoregulation must be based on the study of the relationship between CBF and blood pressure in animals and in humans. The ACZ test is of special interest, for example, when it is performed in patients with cerebrovascular disorders in a preoperative context. This test gives valuable information on cerebrovascular reactivity, but its capacity to forecast cerebrovascular adaptation to hypotension or low flow is at the least questionable.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 5, 1999; revision received October 19, 1999; accepted November 15, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Piepgras A, Schmiedek P, Leinsinger G, Haberl RL,
Kirsch CM, Einhäupl KM. A simple test to assess cerebrovascular
capacity using transcranial Doppler sonography and
acetazolamide. Stroke. 1990;21:13061311.
3.
Chimowitz MI, Furlan AJ, Jones SC, Sila CA, Lorig RL,
Paranandi L, Beck GJ. Transcranial Doppler assessment
of cerebral perfusion reserve in patients with carotid occlusive
disease and no evidence of cerebral infarction. Neurology. 1993;43:353357.
4. Sorteberg W, Lindegaard KF, Rootevelt K, Dahl A, Nyberg Hansen R, Russel D, Nornes H. Effect of acetazolamide on cerebral artery velocity and regional cerebral blood flow in normal subjects. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1989;97:139145.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Kawata Y, Sako K, Yonemasu Y. Sequential changes in cerebrovascular reserve capacity in three-vessel occlusion rats. Brain Res. 1996;739:330334.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hauge A, Nicolaysen G, Thoresen M. Acute effects of acetazolamide on cerebral blood flow in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1983;117:233239.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Lundaar T, Lindegaard KF, Froysaker T, Aaslid R, Grip A, Nornes H. Dissociation between cerebral autoregulation and carbon dioxide reactivity during nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;40:582587.[Abstract]
8.
Okudaira Y, Arai H, Sato K. Cerebral blood flow
alteration by acetazolamide during balloon occlusion:
parameters reflecting cerebral perfusion pressure in the
acetazolamide test. Stroke. 1996;27:617621.
9. Florence G, Seylaz J. Rapid autoregulation of cerebral blood flow: a laser-Doppler flowmetry study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:674680.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Dirnagl U, Kaplan B, Jacewicz M, Pulsinelli W. Continuous measurement of cerebral cortical blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry in a rat stroke model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1989;9:589596.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Vorstrup S, Henriksen L, Paulson OB. Effect of acetazolamide on cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:16341639.
12.
Bickler PE, Litt L, Severinghaus JW. Effects of ACZ on
cerebrocortical NADH and blood volume. J Appl Physiol. 1988;65:428433.
13. Gambhir S, Inao S, Tadokoro M, Nishino M, Ito K, Ishigaki T, Kuchiwaki H, Yoshida J. Comparison of vasodilatory effect of carbon dioxide inhalation and intravenous acetazolamide on brain vasculature using positron emission tomography. Neurol Res. 1997;19:139144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Nemoto EM, Snyder JV, Carroll RG, Morita H. Global
ischemia in dogs: cerebrovascular CO2
reactivity and autoregulation. Stroke. 1975;6:425431.
15.
Florence G, Bonvento G, Charbonné R, Seylaz J.
Spreading depression reversibly impairs autoregulation of cortical
blood flow. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R1136R1140.
16. Harper AM. Physiological control of the cerebral circulation. In: Harper AM, Jennett S, eds. Physiological Society Study Guides. Vol 5. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press; 1990:426.
17.
Bonvento G, Charbonné R, Corrèze JL,
Borredon J, Seylaz J, Lacombe P. Is
-chloralose plus halothane
induction a suitable anaesthetic regimen for cerebrovascular research?
Brain Res. 1994;665:213221.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland,
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study addresses a clinically relevant question of how accurate the acetazolamide test is in identifying patients with impaired autoregulation. The finding of the study that CBF response to acetazolamide is not a good indicator of autoregulatory capacity is in contrast to the finding of Nishimura et al,R3 who observed with positron-emission tomography (PET) in patients with occlusive cerebral artery disease that impaired autoregulation was associated with diminished CO2 reactivity. A dissociation between hypercapnic and acetazolamide vasoreactivities has been reported in subpopulations of patients with occlusive cerebral artery disease.R4 These contradicting reports indicate that further studies are necessary to address this issue and assess the ability of cerebrovascular reactivities to CO2 and acetazolamide to predict autoregulatory impairment and risks of cerebral ischemia in patients with hemodynamically compromised cerebral circulation.
Received August 5, 1999; revision received October 19, 1999; accepted November 15, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Yokota C, Hasegawa Y, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T. Effect
of acetazolamide reactivity and long-term outcome in
patients with major cerebral artery diseases. Stroke.. 1998;29:640644.
3. Nishimura S, Suzuki A, Hatazawa J, Nishimura H, Shirane R, Yasui N, Yoshimoto T. Cerebral blood-flow responses to induced hypotension and to CO2 inhalation in patients with major cerebral artery occlusive disease: a positron-emission tomography study. Neuroradiology.. 1999;41:7379.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Kazumata K, Tanaka N, Ishikawa T, Kuroda S, Houkin K,
Mitsumori K. Dissociation of vasoreactivity to
acetazolamide and hypercapnia: comparative study in
patients with chronic occlusive major cerebral artery disease.
Stroke.. 1996;27:20522058.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-C. Shyu, S.-Z. Lin, P.-S. Yen, C.-Y. Su, D.-C. Chen, H.-J. Wang, and H. Li Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1{alpha} Promotes Neuroprotection, Angiogenesis, and Mobilization/Homing of Bone Marrow-Derived Cells in Stroke Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2008; 324(2): 834 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Uzunca, T. Asil, K. Balci, and U. Utku Evaluation of Vasomotor Reactivity by Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Patients With Acute Stroke Who Have Symptomatic Intracranial and Extracranial Stenosis J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2007; 26(2): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yata, A. Suzuki, J. Hatazawa, E. Shimosegawa, K. Nagata, M. Sato, and J. Moroi Relationship Between Cerebral Circulatory Reserve and Oxygen Extraction Fraction in Patients With Major Cerebral Artery Occlusive Disease: A Positron Emission Tomography Study Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 534 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Edwards, Z. L. Topor, and R. L. Hughson A new two-breath technique for extracting the cerebrovascular response to arterial carbon dioxide Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): R853 - R859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Nemoto and H. Yonas Revisiting the Question, "Is the Acetazolamide Test Valid for Quantitative Assessment of Maximal Cerebral Autoregulatory Vasodilation?" Stroke, May 1, 2001; 32 (5): 1234 - 1237. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Derdeyn Hemodynamic Impairment and Stroke Risk: Prove It AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 233 - 234. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Derdeyn and N. J. Alkayed Is the Acetazolamide Test Valid for Quantitative Assessment of Maximal Cerebral Autoregulatory Vasodilation? Response Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31 (9): 2266 - 2278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |