(Stroke. 2000;31:701.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (Y-W.C., J-S.J., B-S.H., W-H.L., P-K.Y.) and Radiology (H-M.L.), National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, and Department of Neurology, Li-Shin Hospital, Taoyuan (Y-W.C.), Taiwan.
Correspondence to Dr Ping-Keung Yip, Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Rd, Taipei 100, Taiwan. E-mail yuwchen{at}ms9.hinet.net
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsCDS and TCCD were independently performed by technologists and neurologists. Digital subtraction or MR angiography was interpreted by a neuroradiologist. Ultrasonographic studies were categorized into 4 types: I, direct shunting only; II, direct shunting with a carotid aneurysm; III, indirect shunting only; and IV, mixed (direct and indirect) shunting. In addition to carotid and intracranial flow velocities, volume, and pulsatility, other direct and indirect ultrasound signs of shunting were evaluated. The direct sign of CCF was a mosaic flash detected by TCCD. Alteration of hemodynamic parameters on CDS and demonstration of draining veins with the use of TCCD were considered indirect signs.
ResultsFifteen patients (8 men, 7 women) were included in the study. According to angiographic results, patients in ultrasonographic classification types I (n=7) and II (n=3) corresponded to type A of Barrows classification. Patients with type III (n=8) were Barrows type C. Type IV (n=1) had a combination of Barrows types A and C. On ultrasound, both direct and indirect signs were seen in types I, II, and IV CCF. The presence of a 2-colored oval mass divided by a zone of separation without turbulence differentiated type I from type II CCF. All patients with type III CCF had indirect signs, and only 1 patient had direct signs on TCCD. Abnormal TCCD findings were most commonly seen through the transorbital window (100%), followed by the transtemporal window (63%) and transforaminal window (40%).
ConclusionsIf only indirect ultrasonographic signs of CCF are present, TCCD can be used to predict an indirect CCF type on the basis of the origin of the fistula. With direct communication between carotid artery and cavernous sinus, both direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs can be found. The combination of CDS/TCCD may provide a noninvasive and reliable way to classify patients with CCF.
Key Words: aneurysm cavernous sinus fistula ultrasonography, Doppler, duplex, transcranial
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CCF can arise spontaneously or be a complication of head injury. Another kind of vascular anomaly around this area is aneurysmal formation of the ICA or its branches. Infrequently, CCF is associated with an ICA aneurysm after a severe head injury or due to congenital connective tissue defects. An aneurysm superimposed on a CCF may pose problems of diagnosis and management. Catastrophic hemorrhage can result from the aneurysm rupturing either spontaneously or during intervention. These conditions require rapid recognition and prompt treatment. The more complicated condition of an associated aneurysm with CCF was not considered in Barrows classification. On the contrary, the low-flow or indirect dural CCF has a relatively high incidence of spontaneous resolution2 ; therefore, invasive diagnostic measures and treatment might not be necessary. Our previous studies have clearly demonstrated that ultrasonography provides direct imaging of the glomus of CCF itself and differentiates the directness of origin, revealing a relationship between CCF and carotid/cerebral hemodynamics; ultrasonography is suitable for long-term follow-up after intervention.3 4 Recent reports have also described the application of ultrasonography in the detection of cerebral aneurysms.5 6 7 As a result of the invasiveness of angiography, some reports have described and advocated the application of carotid duplex sonography (CDS) and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCD) to insonate the basal cerebral arteries for diagnosis of CCF and other cerebrovascular diseases because of the safety and ease of repetition in follow-up.8 9 10 11 We tried to delineate further the role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and classification of different conditions of CCF. The purpose of this study was to define the specific findings of CDS and TCCD in patients with different types of CCF with or without aneurysm formation.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TCCD was performed with a Diasonic VST Master Series, which contains a 2.0-MHz real-time imaging transducer and a 2.0-MHz pulsed Doppler transducer. The maximum in situ Doppler energy output intensity was 89 mW/cm2 ISTPA.3 (spatial peak time average intensity). In our laboratory, blue is traditionally assigned for the flow toward and red for the flow away from the transducer. Deep shades indicated slow mean blood velocities; lighter shades or a change from blue to green and from red to yellow indicated fast mean blood velocities. Every patient was comprehensively evaluated through the transorbital, transtemporal, and transforaminal windows. Transtemporal insonation of patients in the supine position revealed the ipsilateral distal ICA; the proximal parts of the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries of the circle of Willis; the CS; and sometimes the contralateral cerebral arteries. The examinations through the transorbital window consisted of 2 parts. We first examined the orbital cavity to see whether the ophthalmic veins were engorged and recorded the Doppler characteristics of these veins and then insonated more deeply to investigate the CS. The equipment was used to examine the retro-orbital vessels in the orbital cavity with reduced power for safety requirements. Through the transforaminal window, with patients in the decubitus position, we saw the intracranial vertebral and lower part of the basilar arteries. In addition to the normal intracranial vessels, we tried to insonate CCF and other abnormal vessels through these windows.
The ICA and CS were insonated through the 3 windows to determine whether there was a heterogeneous color mosaic flash suggesting the glomus or the direct sign of CCF.4 The findings of a 2-colored oval structure divided by a dark zone of separation suggested the existence of an aneurysm.5 Draining veins could be found through the transorbital and transforaminal windows. Doppler spectral analysis of these vascular structures was recorded. The alterations of the carotid artery hemodynamics (decreased RI and increased blood flow volume) of the feeding arteries by CDS3 were considered arterial indirect signs. The demonstration of draining veins of CCF by TCCD4 was thought to be a venous indirect sign. The venous indirect signs were visual proof of reversed superior ophthalmic veins or other draining veins through the transorbital window and the engorged basilar plexus through the transforaminal window.4 These veins often exhibited a low-resistance and high-velocity turbulent flow pattern during the Doppler spectral analysis.
This was a blind study. Patients were referred to our neurovascular
laboratory by clinicians on the suggestion of CCF. Two teams (B-S.H.
and Y-W.C., and W-H.L. and J-S.J.) examined each patient, respectively.
The results of 1 team were blind to the other, and the final reports
were sent to the laboratory director (P-K.Y.). An experienced
neuroradiologist (H-M.L.) reviewed the results of angiographic
examinations. They were categorized into 4 ultrasonographic types
according to the following findings. Type I included patients with
direct signs of CCF and/or with indirect signs in the ICA. Type II
shared the same findings with type I, plus additional
aneurysmal findings. Type III consisted of patients with
indirect ultrasound signs only. Type IV included patients with direct
signs and indirect signs in both the ICA and ECA (Table 1
).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The results of TCCD study are shown in Table 3
. Various abnormal findings were
discovered through the 3 separate windows with the use of TCCD. The
transorbital window could show an engorged superior ophthalmic vein and
other draining veins on color-coded imaging with reverse-flow direction
and a turbulent flow pattern of low resistance and high velocity. The
transtemporal window could demonstrate
heterogeneous color mosaic flashes at a depth of
approximately 7 cm, with the CS being located just above the bilateral
carotid canals. Doppler spectral analysis showed
unidirectional or bidirectional turbulent and low-resistance flow
patterns within the flashes. Transforaminal examination could disclose
engorged vessels leaving the cranium, which were adjacent to the
vertebrobasilar arteries. Unidirectional, turbulent, and low-resistance
flow patterns were shown on Doppler spectral analysis
(Figure 1
). The abnormal findings were
more commonly found through the transtemporal and
transorbital windows than the transforaminal window in the type I, II,
and IV patients.
|
|
In addition to the common abnormal findings as in type I, there were
other discoveries in type II patients. Aneurysms arising from
the ICA were found in patients 5 and 6 as another complication of head
injuries. TCCD showed an additional oval mass with 2 different colors,
either red or blue, in different scanning planes. In the plane that
transected through the mid aneurysm level, 2 different colors
(red and blue) divided by a dark zone of separation were shown
simultaneously. Spectral analysis showed no
turbulence within either the red or blue area, which was different from
the turbulent flow shown in CCF (Figure 2
).
|
The universal findings of type III were engorged superior ophthalmic veins through the transorbital window in all patients. The CCF was directly shown as a color flash in the transtemporal window only in patient 9. None showed abnormal findings through the transforaminal window.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Additional findings of a 2-colored oval mass distal to CCF shown on TCCD separated the cases from the commonly occurring direct fistula. These unique findings suggested that these patients suffered from aneurysmal formation of the ICA as well. In most of the reported cases of such combinations, they were secondary to head injury and were usually located distal to the fistula.12 An aneurysm superimposed on CCF may pose problems of diagnosis and management since early opacification of the CS on angiography may mask the presence of an aneurysm, and its presence may be overlooked unless good-quality subtraction films are routinely obtained.12 Catastrophic hemorrhage could result from the aneurysm rupturing either spontaneously or during intervention. Although this combination is rare, it requires rapid recognition and prompt treatment. Therefore, we propose to divide Barrows type A into 2 types on the basis of ultrasonographic findings, ie, type I, direct CCF only, and type II, direct CCF with an aneurysm. The findings of our 3 type II patients included the characteristic findings of both CCF and carotid aneurysms. The 2-colored oval masses were located approximately 1 cm distal to the mosaic mass of CCF in the transtemporal window. The spectral analysis showed laminal flow in the former and turbulent flow in the latter. The reported detection rate of aneurysms with the use of TCCD was variable, ranging from 47% to 85%.5 13 14 If the aneurysms were small (<5 mm), thrombosed, or located with an unfavorable scanning plane, the ability of TCCD to detect them was limited.5 15 Intensity-dependent color-coded sonography (power Doppler mode) provided supplementary information through the detection of slow blood flow in the aneurysm.15 Administration of contrast medium may also increase the detection rate.14 15 Although TCCD should not be used as a screening procedure for the aforementioned reasons, being familiar with the characteristic findings of aneurysms can help physicians to find more aneurysms. This procedure also offers a noninvasive method for monitoring progressive intra-aneurysmal thrombosis after coil embolization and during the follow-up period of untreatable fusiform aneurysms.14
The findings of type III were quite different from those of types I and
II. The changes of flow volume and RI were not as conspicuous as with a
direct type of CCF. Abnormal values of the feeding ECA were shown in
patients 9 and 12 (25%). In the TCCD study, the consistent
findings were the abnormal draining of ophthalmic veins through the
transorbital windows (100%). Viewing of the mosaic mass via
transtemporal windows was only noted in patient 9 (13%,
1/8). Since the shunting flow of the indirect type of CCF is usually
less than that of direct ones, the alterations of flow volume in CDS
and of Doppler signals in TCCD are therefore less distinct. Patient
9 had increased flow volume in the feeding of ECA, which was also a
rare finding in CDS among this group (Table 2
). It was the
remarkable increase in blood flow that demonstrated CCF with direct
signs. On the basis of these findings, we concluded that direct
signs on TCCD were uncommon in the patients with indirect CCF and could
only be seen when the flow volume of the feeding artery was markedly
increased, which could be measured with CDS. This extraordinary
condition was not reported in our previous study because of the limited
number of cases.4
CDS and TCCD may be used as an aid to plan the optimal treatment for each type of CCF patient. In type I patients, coil embolization should be considered first. There is still controversy about the ideal treatment for type II patients. Reddy and Sundt12 believed that CCF with concomitant aneurysms required direct surgical exploration in most cases. Other investigators believe that a traumatic ICA aneurysm should be treated conservatively because of the high probability of intraoperative rupture and the difficulty in clipping the aneurysm because of a broad neck or a fibrous wall.16 In type III, an initial conservative approach is indicated because of the high incidence of spontaneous resolution. De Keizer17 even proposed that angiography may be deferred, considering that a complication rate of 10% must be accounted for in arteriography. In such cases, CDS and TCCD are good tools for follow-up of patients on the basis of changes of symptoms.
The limitations of ultrasonographic classification of CCF include the following. (1) Ultrasonographic examinations are dependent on technology, especially in small and angle-dependent lesions, eg, small CCF or aneurysms. (2) The ability of CDS to differentiate various types of indirect CCF is not perfect when the alteration in hemodynamic parameters is not apparent. In patient 14, the indirect shunting from the left ECA was not recognized because the changes of hemodynamic parameters of the ECA were not prominent. The limitations of this classification are also true for other indirect ICA shunting lesions (type B of Barrows classification), and it cannot be used to differentiate type C from type D because the same changes in hemodynamic parameters occurred.3 However, the additional tool of TCCD is sensitive in detecting the presence of CCF if venous indirect signs are present. Engorged ophthalmic veins with reverse flow were universal findings in previous reports and the present study,4 10 and this examination can also be performed with TCCD and even with CDS (with reduced power). Therefore, we suggest that ultrasonographic classification of CCF may be used as a screening procedure in suspected patients to select patients for further investigation.
On the basis of our previous and present findings, when only indirect ultrasonographic signs of CCF are present, TCCD is predictive of an indirect CCF type. When direct signs and arterial indirect signs in the ICA are present, this is indicative of a direct CCF type. The addition of a 2-colored oval mass divided by a dark zone of separation differentiates type II from type I. When the arterial indirect signs are present in the ICA and ECA with the direct signs of CCF, a mixed type of CCF should be considered. These findings can help us in the diagnosis and classification of patients with different types of CCF. The combination of CDS and TCCD provides an excellent method for follow-up after intervention because of CCF and aneurysms.4 11 14 18 19
Received June 29, 1999; revision received December 1, 1999; accepted December 8, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Barrow DL, Specter RH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC. Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg. 1985;62:248256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Lin HJ, Yip PK, Liu HM, Hwang BS, Chen RC. Non-invasive hemodynamic classification of carotid-cavernous fistulas by duplex carotid sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:105113.[Abstract]
4. Chen YW, Jeng JS, Liu HM, Yip PK, Hwang BS, Lin WH, Chang YC, Tu YK. Diagnosis and follow-up of carotid-cavernous fistulas by carotid duplex sonography and transcranial color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22:11551162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Baumgartner RW, Mattle HP, Kothbauer K, Schroth G. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in cerebral aneurysm. Stroke. 1994;25:24292434.[Abstract]
6. Griewing B, Motsch L, Piek J, Schminke U, Brasssel F, Kessler C. Transcranial power mode Doppler duplex sonography of intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroimaging. 1998;8:155158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Wardlaw J. Detection of cerebral aneurysms by TCCS and its clinical consequences. In: Bogdahn U, Becker G, Schlachetzki F, eds. Echoenhancers and Transcranial Color Duplex Sonography. Berlin, Germany: Blackwell Science Inc; 1998:298305.
8.
Bogdahn U, Becker G, Winkler J, Greiner K, Prez J,
Meurers B. Transcranial color-coded real-time sonography in
adults. Stroke. 1990;21:16801688.
9. Tsuchiya T, Yasaka, M, Yamaguchi T, Kimura K, Omae T. Imaging of the basal cerebral arteries and measurement of blood velocity in adults by using transcranial real-time color flow Doppler sonography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:497502.[Abstract]
10. Muttaqin Z, Arita K, Uozumi T, Kuwabara S, Oki S, Ohba S, Kurisu K, Nakahara T, Kohno H, Satoh H. Transcranial Doppler sonography in carotid-cavernous fistulas: analysis of five cases. Surg Neurol. 1992;38:179185.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Guo WY, Teng MMH, Hsu CC, Tiu CM, Lirng JF, Luo CB, Shiau CY, Pan DHC. Verifying complete obliteration of carotid artery-cavernous fistula: role of color Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17:289295.[Abstract]
12. Reddy SVR, Sundt TM. Giant traumatic false aneurysm of the internal carotid artery associated with a carotid-cavernous fistula. J Neurosurg. 1981;55:813818.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Griewing B, Motsch L, Pick J, Schminke U, Brassel F, Lessler C. Transcranial power mode Doppler duplex sonography of intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroimaging. 1998;8:155158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Klotzsch C, Nahser HC, Fischer B, Henkes H, Kuhne D, Berlit P. Visualization of intracranial aneurysms by transcranial duplex sonography. Neuroradiology. 1996;38:555559.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bartels E. TCCS: cerebral arteries and parenchyma. In: Bartels E, ed. Color-Coded Duplex Ultrasonography of the Cerebral Vessels: Atlas and Manual. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer; 1999:210211.
16. Masana Y, Taneda M. Direct approach to a traumatic giant internal carotid artery aneurysm associated with a carotid-cavernous fistula. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:524527.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. De Keizer RJW. Spontaneous carotid-cavernous fistulas. Neuro-ophthalmology. 1981;2:3546.
18. Schoning M, Grunert D, Hassler W, Voigt K, Michaelis R. Demonstration of giant MCA aneurysm by transcranial duplex sonography and color Doppler imaging. Childs Nerv Syst. 1993;9:110114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Schuknecht B, Chen JJ, Valavanis A. Transcranial color-coded Doppler sonography of intracranial aneurysms before and after endovascular occlusion with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:16591667.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L-K Tsai, S-J Yeh, Y-C Chen, H-M Liu, and J-S Jeng Screen for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae with carotid duplex sonography J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2009; 80(11): 1225 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Akiba, M. Tamakawa, H. Hyodoh, K. Hyodoh, N. Yama, T. Nonaka, Y. Minamida, M. Hashimoto, and M. Hareyama Assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas of the Cavernous Sinuses on 3D Dynamic MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1652 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Duan, X. Liu, X. Zhou, T. Cao, L. Ruan, and Y. Zhao Diagnosis and Follow-up Study of Carotid Cavernous Fistulas With Color Doppler Ultrasonography: Analysis of 33 Cases J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2005; 24(6): 739 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. U. Harrer, O. Popescu, H. H. Henkes, and C. Klotzsch Assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae by Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography Stroke, May 1, 2005; 36(5): 976 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-K. Tsai, H.-M. Liu, C.-J. Lu, J.-S. Jeng, and P.-K. Yip Carotid Duplex Sonography in the Follow-Up of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 625 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-K. Tsai, J.-S. Jeng, H.-J. Wang, P.-K. Yip, and H.-M. Liu Diagnosis of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas by Carotid Duplex Sonography J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 785 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Yanik, I. Conkbayir, M. H. Ozturk, G. Acaroglu, and B. Hekimoglu Partial Steal Phenomenon in the Ophthalmic Artery Due to a Direct Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula: Orbital Color Doppler Ultrasonographic Findings J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2003; 22(10): 1107 - 1110. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |