| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2000;31:1144.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Psychology (S.T.B., T.S.), University of Texas (Austin); and Department of Neurology (R.S., J.A., J.C.G.), University of Texas Medical School (Houston).
Correspondence to Sondra T. Bland, 330 Mezes Hall, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail sbland{at}mail.utexas.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsIschemia of moderate severity was produced in male Long-Evans rats through 45 minutes of occlusion of the left middle cerebral and both common carotid arteries. Exclusive use of either the affected or unaffected forelimb was forced through immobilization of either the ipsilateral (MCAO+ipsi) or contralateral (MCAO+contra) forelimb, respectively, for 10 days in a plaster cast, or the animal was left uncasted (MCAO+nocast). Sham surgeries were performed, and animals were also casted for 10 days or left uncasted. Sensorimotor testing was performed during days 17 to 38. At the end of sensorimotor testing, cognitive performance was tested with use of the Morris water maze. In a separate experiment, temperatures and corticosterone levels were measured during the 10-day period after 45-minute ischemia and casting.
ResultsThe MCAO+ipsi group performed worse on sensorimotor tasks than the MCAO+contra, MCAO+nocast, and sham groups. Infarct volume was significantly larger in the MCAO+ipsi group than in the sham and MCAO+contra groups but not in the MCAO+nocast group. No group differences were found with the Morris water maze, and no group differences were found in either temperature or plasma corticosterone level.
ConclusionsThe exclusive use of the affected forelimb immediately after focal ischemia has detrimental effects on sensorimotor function that cannot be attributed to hyperthermia or stress.
Key Words: middle cerebral artery occlusion motor activity stroke, experimental rats
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immobilization of the ipsilateral (unaffected) arm of patients with stroke, thus forcing exclusive use of the affected arm, has been shown to improve long-term functional outcome. Taub et al5 6 and others7 8 have shown that constraint of the unaffected arm in combination with physical therapy, when implemented several months after disruption of function due to unilateral stroke, leads to significant improvements in the function of the impaired arm.
Risedal et al9 recently reported that moderate motor "training" in rats exaggerated the infarct size if it occurred during the first week after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) but not if it occurred during the second week. The adverse training began 24 hours or 7 days after MCAO distal to the striatal branches. The training regimen consisted of an enriched environment plus 2 regimens of motor challenges that took place on alternate days for 5 days. Poststroke exposure to enriched environments without specific motor training improves functional outcome.10 11 12 Experiments such as these raise further concerns about what the most appropriate rehabilitation regimen might be after stroke.
To determine whether limb-specific early rehabilitation affects functional outcome after ischemic stroke, we examined the effects of casting after moderate transient MCAO with the use of a 3-vessel occlusion model in rats. Because the window of vulnerability to exclusive use is not known after ischemic stroke, animals remained casted for 10 days. The immobilization of 1 limb may be stressful to animals, so we monitored plasma corticosterone levels throughout the casting period. Metyrapone, a corticosterone synthesis inhibitor, can reduce infarct volume after MCAO,13 so it seemed possible that corticosterone, if increased by casting, might contribute to an exaggeration of injury. It also seemed possible that the casting regimen might result in hyperthermia, which has been shown to have detrimental effects on outcome after MCAO,14 15 16 even if the hyperthermia is delayed for 24 hours.17 Therefore, temperatures were monitored throughout the casting period via thermistors chronically implanted in the temporalis muscle.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
We used 52 male Long-Evans rats (Harlan Sprague-Dawley) that
weighed between 300 and 350 g at the time of surgery. Thirty-four
animals were used in the behavioral studies, and 18 animals were used
in the corticosterone and temperature studies (9 of the animals in the
corticosterone study were also used in the temperature study). Animals
were kept on a 12-hour light/dark cycle and allowed rat chow and water
ad libitum.
Animal Stroke Model
Animals were deprived of food but not water overnight before
surgery. Animals were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (490
mg/kg IP). Surgical procedures were performed under an operating
microscope. Both common carotid arteries (CCAs) were isolated via a
midline neck incision and tagged with loose sutures. A skin incision
was made horizontally between the left eye and ear. The skull was
exposed by parting the temporalis muscle with blunt dissection, with
care taken to not damage the facial nerve. A 2-mm burr hole was made by
drilling through the squamous temporal bone 2 mm anterior to its
junction with the zygomatic arch to expose the MCA. The dura mater was
cut above the MCA, and a 3-mm length of stainless steel wire
(0.005-inch diameter) was inserted between the MCA and the parenchyma,
lifted, and turned 90° counterclockwise. Both CCAs were then occluded
with the use of atraumatic aneurysm clips. Interruption of
blood flow was verified by the measurement of cerebral perfusion with a
laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF) (model BPM2; Vasamedics, Inc). At the
end of the 45-minute ischemic period, blood flow was
reestablished by first turning the occluding wire clockwise and
removing it and then removing the clips from the CCAs. Sham surgery
included isolation of the CCAs, exposure of the MCA, and cutting of the
dura mater. Animals were maintained at 37°C during all surgical
procedures and during recovery. Because we were concerned about the
effects of femoral artery cannulation on behavior, mean
arterial blood pressure and blood gases were not
measured.
Measurement of Cerebral Perfusion
To verify occlusion of the MCA, cerebral perfusion in the region
previously shown to correspond to the core of the
infarct18 was measured as previously
described.18 Briefly, immediately after the burr hole
exposed the MCA, a second burr hole 1 mm in diameter was made
4 mm dorsal to the first burr hole for the introduction of a
0.8-mm-diameter fiber-optic probe, which was coupled to the LDF. Care
was taken to avoid damage to the dura. Under the operating microscope,
the fiber optic probe was held in a vertical position in the burr hole
touching but not compressing the dura, which was moistened with 0.9%
saline. Cerebral perfusion (mL ·
min-1 · 100 g-1)
was measured before (baseline) and after occlusion of the MCA and both
CCAs.
Casting Procedure
Before recovery from anesthesia after MCAO or
sham surgery, animals were either fitted with 1-sleeve plaster casts or
left uncasted. The upper torso was wrapped in soft felt, and either the
ipsilateral (ipsi cast) or contralateral (contra cast) forelimb was
wrapped in felt and positioned in a naturally retracted position
against the animals sternum. Plaster of Paris strips were wrapped
around the immobilized limb and upper torso.19
Animals remained in the casts for 10 days.
Temperature Analysis
Animals had remote temperature transponders (BMDS) implanted in
the exposed temporalis muscle immediately after reperfusion and before
closure of the incision. Temperature was measured with a digital reader
(BMDS) 5 hours after reperfusion and on postsurgery days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7,
and 10 between 12 noon and 3 PM.
Corticosterone Analysis
Tail blood was collected in capillary tubes that had been
flushed with sodium heparin solution. Blood was collected 1 day before
surgery and on postsurgery days 1, 4, and 10. The blood collection
procedure was completed within 3 minutes of removal of the animal from
the home cage and was performed between 12 noon and 3 PM.
The plasma fraction was stored at -20°C for later analysis
of corticosterone with a 3H immunoassay kit
(ICN).
Behavioral Testing Procedures
All sensorimotor testing was performed during the light cycle.
Animals were pretested the day before surgery and then tested once each
week beginning 7 days after cast removal on postsurgery days 17, 24,
31, and 38. Water maze testing was performed between 6 and 11
PM and began on day 39 postsurgery.
Measurement of Forelimb Placing
Animals were held by their torsos with the forelimbs hanging
freely. Contralateral and ipsilateral forelimb placing responses were
induced by gently brushing the respective vibrissae on the edge of a
tabletop once per trial for 10 trials. A score of 1 was given each time
the rat placed its forelimb on the edge of the tabletop in response to
the vibrissae stimulation. Percent successful placing responses were
determined (number correctx10) for contralateral and ipsilateral
responses.
Measurement of Footfault Asymmetry
Animals were placed on an elevated grid, with openings of
2.3 cm2, for 2 minutes. As the animals
traversed the grid, a footfault was scored each time a paw slipped
through an opening in the grid. The total number of steps were also
counted. A footfault index was computed [(contra faults-ipsi
faults)/(total steps)] such that a score of 0 represents no
asymmetry, a positive score represents a contralateral deficit,
and a negative score represents an ipsilateral deficit.
Morris Water Maze
Acquisition of spatial learning was tested using procedures
adapted from Morris.20 The apparatus consisted
of a 1.3-m-diameter white steel tank filled with 30 cm of water that
was made opaque with white tempera paint and maintained at 24°C. The
walls of the room contained visual cues that remained constant across
the experiment. A ceramic 8-cm-diameter circular platform was submerged
under 2.5 cm of water in 1 quadrant of the tank during all training
trials. On the first training day, a single habituation trial was
performed by placing each animal on the hidden platform for 60 seconds.
If the animal fell or jumped from the platform, it was removed from the
water and placed back on the platform. On each of the following 4 days,
1 block of 4 training trials was performed for each animal. Animals
were placed in the maze at 1 of 4 locations in a different randomized
order for each block. Animals were allowed 60 seconds to find the
platform or they were placed on it, and they were left on the platform
for 30 seconds. Latency to find the platform, distance swum per
quadrant, and time spent in each quadrant were determined with San
Diego Instruments software. A probe trial was run 48 hours after the
final training block. Before the probe trial, the platform was removed
from the maze, and each animal was placed in the water at a
predetermined location and allowed to search for the platform for 60
seconds. Time spent in the goal quadrant was analyzed for the
probe trial.
Histology
Animals were deeply anesthetized with chloral hydrate
and intracardially perfused with 0.9% saline followed by 4%
paraformaldehyde with 15% picric acid in PBS. The
brains were removed and postfixed in the same fixative for 24 hours and
then cryoprotected in 10%, 20%, and 30% sucrose in PBS for 24 hours
at each concentration. The brains were then snap frozen and stored at
-80° for later cryostat sectioning. Eight 50-µm sections were
taken 1 mm apart and mounted onto Superfrost Plus slides for
hematoxylin and eosin staining. Each section was scanned into a
Macintosh computer with the use of Brain software. Each cortical
hemisphere was measured through drawing with a cursor by an
experimenter who was blinded with respect to the treatment conditions.
Volumes of remaining tissue were computed for infarcted (ipsilateral)
and contralateral cortical and striatal hemispheres through summing the
8 areas and then multiplying by the distance apart. Infarct volumes
were computed by subtracting the ipsilateral (infarcted) hemisphere
volume from the contralateral hemisphere volume, to reflect atrophy of
remaining tissue in the infarcted hemisphere.
Statistical Analysis
There were no significant differences between the sham
(nonischemic) groups in the 3 casting conditions, so their data
were pooled and labeled "sham." Physiological
and behavioral data were analyzed with mixed ANOVA with group
(MCAO+ipsi, MCAO+contra, MCAO+nocast, sham) as the between-group
variable and time as the within-subject variable, with the
exception of probe trial data, which were analyzed with 1-way
between-group ANOVA. Several brains were damaged due to technical
problems, leaving 7 MCAO+contra, 7 MCAO+ipsi, 8 MCAO+nocast, and 3 sham
brains for the histological analysis. Infarct
volumes and volumes of remaining cortex were analyzed with
1-way between-group ANOVA. Fishers LSD was used for post hoc
analysis of main effects, and simple effects tests were used
for analysis of interactions.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Forelimb Placing
Exclusive use of the affected forelimb after MCAO resulted in an
exaggeration of a forelimb placing deficit. As shown in Figure 1A
, MCAO+ipsi rats were more impaired in
the percentage of successful placing responses with the contralateral
forelimb than all other groups (P<0.05). No impairments
were observed in placement of the ipsilateral forelimb in any of the
groups (data not shown).
|
Footfault
Exclusive use of the affected forelimb after MCAO resulted in
impaired performance on the footfault task. As shown in Figure 1B
, all MCAO groups were significantly more impaired with the
contralateral forelimb on the footfault task than were the sham group,
as indicated by higher footfault index scores (P<0.01).
Furthermore, MCAO+ipsi rats had higher footfault index scores than the
MCAO+contra and MCAO+nocast groups (P<0.05), but the
MCAO+contra and MCAO+nocast groups did not differ.
Morris Water Maze
There was no effect of either casting or MCAO on
performance in the Morris water maze. Latency to find the
hidden platform for the 4 trials of each day was grouped into blocks
for the within-subject variable of time (Figure 2A
). All groups learned to find the
hidden platform, as indicated by shorter latencies across days
(P<0.01). There was no significant difference in latency to
find the platform between groups and no interaction. Time spent in the
goal quadrant during the probe trial not differ among groups (Figure 2B
).
|
Histology
There was a significant effect of group on cortical infarct volume
(P<0.01) as shown in Figure 3A
. MCAO+ipsi rats had larger cortical
infarct volumes than nonischemic sham rats
(P<0.05), reflecting the atrophy of tissue in the infarcted
hemisphere. No other MCAO groups were significantly different from sham
rats. MCAO+ipsi rats had larger infarct volumes than MCAO+contra rats
(P<0.01), and MCAO+nocast rats also had larger infarct
volumes than MCAO+contra rats (P<0.01). There was a
significant effect of group on cortex volume
(F3,21=5.98, P<0.01), as shown
in Figure 3B
. All MCAO groups had significantly smaller cortex
volumes than the sham group (MCAO+ipsi, P<0.001;
MCAO+nocast, P<0.01; MCAO+contra, P<0.05).
There were no significant differences in striatal infarct volume or in
striatal volume (data not shown).
|
Temperature and Corticosterone
There was no effect of casting after MCAO on either temperature or
plasma corticosterone level throughout the casting period. Temporalis
muscle temperatures did not differ either between groups or across
time, and there was no interaction, as shown in Figure 4A
. There was a significant effect of
time on plasma corticosterone level (P<0.01); basal
corticosterone levels were higher than postsurgery levels. There were
no differences between groups on plasma corticosterone level, as shown
in Figure 4B
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These results extend the results of Kozlowski et al,1 Schallert and Kozlowski,2 and Humm et al,3 who reported that the exclusive use of an affected forelimb during the early critical period after electrolytic lesions of the FL-SMC retards functional recovery and results in gross enhancement of the original damage. We found that there was no detectable exaggeration of cortical infarct volume resulting from early exclusive use after 45 minutes of MCAO. The exaggeration of anatomic damage after this model of MCAO appears to be less extreme than that after electrolytic lesions of the FL-SMC. This may due in part to the different location of the damage. An examination of triphenyltetrazolium chloridestained slices 1 to 3 days after the surgery indicated that infarctions in this model of moderate distal MCAO include primarily parietal cortex, although the penumbra appears to involve FL-SMC in many animals. It is important to note that in contrast to focal electrolytic lesions, MCAO involves no mechanical damage to either cortical neurons or the corpus callosum, which may also explain the different effects of early exclusive use in these models. Early exclusive use did result in exaggeration of sensorimotor deficits in this model of transient MCAO. Sensorimotor function may be a more sensitive assay for the detection of neurological damage than a gross examination of tissue loss,21 especially when tested at multiple time points, as in the present study.
It is interesting to note that MCAO+contra infarct volumes were similar to those of the sham rats, yet performance on sensorimotor tasks was similar to that of the MCAO+nocast group. An analysis of total cortical tissue (the sum of both hemispheres) reveals that all MCAO groups were different from the sham group. One possible explanation for the discrepancy between functional outcome and infarct volume in this group could be diffuse bilateral damage, which may result from ischemia in this rat model. This diffuse injury may be vulnerable to the effects of behavioral pressure that involve the limb ipsilateral to the infarcted hemisphere. Furthermore, casting of the impaired limb may prolong functional impairments, in the absence of gross anatomic damage, by prolonging metabolic depression; this depression was termed "diaschisis" by von Monakow.22 In rats, diffuse, long-lasting reductions in oxidative metabolism, as measured with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry,23 and in glucose metabolism, as measured with 2-deoxyglucose uptake,24 have been found after a mild concussive injury that caused no gross morphological damage. Cytochrome oxidase activity was reduced in subcortical structures for up to 30 days after visual cortex ablation in cats, and this was related to a tactile placing deficit.25 PET studies reveal metabolic depression of unaffected brain regions in humans after ischemic stroke26 and that this hypometabolism is related to impaired cognitive function.27 Recovery of language function in aphasic patients after stroke was shown to be associated with a regression of metabolic depression in unaffected regions, as measured with PET.28
Although there were group differences in both the footfault task and the forelimb placing task, there was no effect of MCAO on spatial learning in the Morris water maze. Spatial learning may be dependent on an intact parietal cortex,29 30 31 but animals may be able to compensate after unilateral damage to the left parietal cortex,32 which was the side damaged in the present model of MCAO. Our results are in contrast to the findings of Markgraf et al,33 who report that cognitive deficits were found 8 weeks after permanent MCAO in Sprague-Dawley rats, even though recovery on sensorimotor tasks had occurred. Stroemer et al34 also found long-lasting learning deficits in the Morris water maze after permanent MCAO; however, performance on a footfault with large grid openings was also still impaired.
We have previously shown that after a more severe MCAO, exclusive use had no effect on functional or anatomic outcome.35 Rats were subjected to 90 minutes of 3-vessel occlusion, with a model similar to the present model, and were ipsilaterally casted or left uncasted for 14 days. At 30 days, there were no discernible differences in either sensorimotor function or infarct volume between animals that had been casted or left uncasted. Cortical damage may have been near maximal after this duration of ischemia and thus not vulnerable to the detrimental effects of exclusive use. However, Risedal et al9 reported an increase in infarct volume after moderate but "adverse" motor training in SHR during the first week after permanent distal MCAO, even though animals in this early training group had improved functional outcome relative to animals in the no-training and late-training groups. The motor training regimen used by Risedal et al9 may have allowed compensatory plasticity in both hemispheres to occur even while exacerbating damage to the infarcted hemisphere. Alternatively, it is possible that the contralateral cortex may have become thicker as a result of early training, giving the appearance of a smaller ipsilateral side.19
Enhanced brain damage does not appear to be inevitable after early overuse. The location and type of damage, as well as the timing and the intensity of the behavioral pressure, all appear to be important factors that contribute to use-dependent exaggeration of injury. Colbourne et al36 found that forced use of the hippocampus did not increase the extent of damage to hippocampal neurons after global ischemia with hypothermia in gerbils. Multiple behavioral testing involving hippocampus-dependent tasks failed to increase the number of damaged neurons in the CA1 subfield. It is possible that vulnerable hippocampal neurons may not be susceptible to overuse effects. However, it should be noted that the training regimen was relatively mild and was not implemented until 4 days after the insult in this experiment. Mild physical training after brain injury has not shown to be deleterious. Early training in food pellet retrieval tasks does not exacerbate cortical damage after focal stroke in primates and appears to promote reorganization of relevant cortical representation areas.37 38 Stoltz et al39 have shown that 5 minutes of swimming each day beginning 5 days after electrolytic lesions of the FL-SMC has no adverse effect on either lesion size or functional outcome in rats. Forced exercise on a running wheel during the early postlesion period led to improvements in functional outcome after focal cortical lesions and no change in lesion volume.40 These behavioral results of Hart et al40 are consistent with those of Risedal et al,9 who found improvements in functional outcome in animals that had received early "adverse" moderate motor therapy after permanent MCAO in SHR. Mild physical training may be beneficial when administered in combination with pharmacotherapy. For example, after suction ablation of the motor cortex in rats, beam walking performance was significantly improved after the administration of amphetamine only when animals were allowed practice trials on the beam and not when animals were given amphetamine without practice.41
After some types of brain injury, early exclusive use with casting can reduce damage. Tillerson et al42 found that the exclusive use of the affected forelimb by ipsilateral limb immobilization for 7 days improved function in a rat model of Parkinsons disease when rats were tested up to 60 days after the surgery. Rats that had been casted were similar to sham rats in spontaneous limb use, as well as in apomorphine-induced rotation. In addition, dopamine levels were closer to sham levels in rats that had been casted. It is possible that vulnerable striatal neurons respond differently to the demands of early exclusive use than do vulnerable cortical neurons. We are currently investigating the effects of early exclusive use on outcome after ischemic damage to the striatum with the poly-L-lysinecoated intraluminal suture model of MCAO,43 in which relatively short durations of occlusion preferentially cause subcortical damage.
The mechanism of use-dependent exaggeration of injury remains unclear. We have reported that neither contralateral nor ipsilateral casting causes hyperthermia. Hyperthermia has been well established as a moderator of neuronal injury after focal ischemia.14 15 16 17 However, we cannot rule out the possibility that local increases in brain temperature occur as a result of exclusive use. We have also demonstrated that the casting paradigm does not cause increases in the stress-related hormone corticosterone, which has been shown to be deleterious after focal ischemia and excitotoxic cortical injury13 and has long been known to be deleterious to hippocampal neurons both in intact animals44 and after global ischemia.45 Moreover, the inhibition of corticosterone synthesis during the casting period with metyrapone did not block use-dependent exaggeration of injury after FL-SMC lesions (S.T.B., J.L. Humm, and T.S., unpublished data). We have previously shown that blockade of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor by the noncompetitive antagonist MK-801 attenuates use-dependent exaggeration of injury after electrolytic lesions.46 A mechanism other than excessive release of glutamate into the extracellular space may be responsible, because forced exclusive use via casting did not result in increases in glutamate levels when measured with in vivo microdialysis.47 Enhanced NMDA-mediated excitatory postsynaptic activity occurs during the early period in the area surrounding cortical heat lesions,48 and inhibitory GABAergic activity is reduced.49 Glutamate receptors, including NMDA receptors, are upregulated in the striatum after lesions of the frontal cortex.50 It is possible that overactivation of these receptors by neuronal activity, even in the absence of high levels of glutamate in the extracellular space, is detrimental to outcome during this period of hyperexcitability. It is important to note that Qü et al51 demonstrated that NMDA receptor excitability is increased after stroke in mice for up to 28 days, yet behavioral pressure has not been shown to exacerbate damage when it is begun later than the first week after damage.3
The present results are in contrast to several studies in humans that report the forced use of an impaired arm improves functional outcome after ischemic stroke.5 6 7 8 Taub et al5 has proposed that "constraint therapy" (ie, immobilization of the unaffected arm in combination with physical therapy) may allow the patient to overcome "learned nonuse" of the arm after brain damage. In these studies,5 6 7 8 forced limb use was begun several months after the damage had occurred. The effects of extreme regimens of physical therapy implemented during the acute phase after brain injury in human patients depend on many factors and are largely unknown.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 10, 1999; revision received January 19, 2000; accepted February 28, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Schallert T, Kozlowski DA. Brain damage and plasticity: use-related neural growth and overuse-related exaggeration of injury. In: Ginsberg MD, Bogousslavsky J, eds. Cerebrovascular Disease: Pathology, Diagnosis, and Management. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science; 1998:611619.
3. Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, James DC, Gotts JE, Schallert T. Use-dependent exacerbation of brain damage occurs during an early post-lesion vulnerable period. Brain Res. 1998;783:286292.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kozlowski DA, von Stuck SL, Lee SM, Hovda DA. Behaviorally-induced contusions following traumatic brain injury: use-dependent secondary insults. Soc Neurosci Abstr.. 1996;22:744.17.
5. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW, DeLuca SC, Miller NE. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned non-use by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61:281293.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Taub E, Pidikiti D, DeLuca SC, Crago JE. Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain/behaviors. In: Toole JF, Good DC, eds. Imaging in Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Vermande; 1996:133154.
7.
Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E.
Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic
motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586592.
8. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Risedal A, Zeng J, Johansson BB. Early training may exacerbate brain damage after focal brain ischemia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:9971003.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Ohlsson AL, Johansson BB. Environment influences
functional outcome of cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke. 1995;26:644649.
11. Johansson BB. Functional recovery after brain infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995;5:278271.
12. Johansson BB, Ohlsson AL. Environment, social interaction, and physical activity as determinants of functional outcome after cerebral infarction in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1996;139:322327.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Smith-Swintowsky VL, Pettigrew LC, Sapolsky RM, Pares C, Craddock SD, Brooke SM, Mattson MP. Metyrapone, an inhibitor of glucocorticoid production, reduces brain injury induced by focal and global ischemia and seizures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:585598.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Busto R, Dietrich WD, Globus MYT, Valdes I, Scheinberg P, Ginsberg MD. Small differences in intra-ischemic brain temperature critically determine the extent of ischemic neuronal injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1987;7:729738.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Dietrich WD, Busto R, Halley M, Valdes I. The importance of brain temperature in alterations of the blood-brain barrier following cerebral ischemia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1990;49:486497.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ginsberg MD, Sternau LL, Globus MY, Dietrich WD, Busto R. Therapeutic modulation of brain temperature: relevance to ischemic brain injury. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1992;4:189225.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Zhang RL, Chopp M, Chen H, Garcia JH, Zhang ZG.
Postischemic (1 hour) hypothermia significantly reduces
ischemic cell damage in rats subjected to 2 hours of middle
cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 1993;24:12351240.
18. Aronowski J, Strong R, Grotta JC. Reperfusion injury: demonstration of brain damage produced by reperfusion after transient focal ischemia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17:10481056.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Jones TA, Schallert T. Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. J Neurosci. 1994;14:21402152.[Abstract]
20. Morris RGM. Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning Motivation. 1981;12:239260.
21. Corbett D, Nurse S. The problem of assessing effective neuroprotection in experimental cerebral ischemia. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;54:531548.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. von Monakow CV. Lokalization der hirnfunktionen. J Psychol Neurol.. 1911;17:185200. Reprinted in English in von Bonin C. The Cerebral Cortex. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1960.
23. Hovda DA, Yoshino A, Kawamata T, Katayama Y, Becker DP. Diffuse prolonged depression of cerebral oxidative metabolism following concussive brain injury in the rat: a cytochrome oxidase histochemistry study. Brain Res. 1991;567:110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Yoshino A, Hovda DA, Kawamata T, Katayama Y, Becker DP. Dynamic changes in local cerebral glucose utilization following cerebral concussion in rats: evidence of a hyper- and subsequent hypometabolic state. Brain Res. 1991;561:106119.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Hovda DA, Sutton RL, Feeney DM. Recovery of tactile placing after visual cortex ablation in cats: a behavioral and metabolic study of diaschisis. Exp Neurol. 1987;97:391402.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Kushner M, Alavi A, Reivich M, Dann R, Burke A, Robinson G. Contralateral cerebellar hypometabolism following cerebral insult: a positron emission tomographic study. Ann Neurol. 1984;15:425434.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Kwan LT, Reed BR, Eberling JL, Schuff N, Tanabe J,
Norman D, Weiner MW, Jagust WJ. Effects of subcortical cerebral
infarction on cortical glucose metabolism and cognitive
function. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:809814.
28. Cappa SF, Perani D, Grassi F, Bressi S, Alberoni M, Franchesi M, Bettinardi V, Todde S, Fazio F. A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in acute aphasics. Brain Lang. 1997;56:5567.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. DiMattia BD, Kesner RP. Spatial cognitive maps: differential role of parietal cortex and hippocampal formation. Behav Neurosci. 1988;102:471480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Poucet B, Benhamou S. The neuropsychology of spatial cognition in the rat. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1997;11:101120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Kolb B, Buhrmann K, McDonald R, Sutherland RJ.
Dissociation of the medial prefrontal, posterior parietal, and
posterior temporal cortex for spatial navigation and recognition memory
in the rat. Cereb Cortex. 1994;4:664680.
32. McDaniel WF, Via JD, Smith JS, Wells DL, Fu JJ, Bishop JF, Boyd PA, Ledesma HM. Unilateral injury of posterior parietal cortex and spatial learning in hooded rats. Behav Brain Res. 1995;70:165179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Markgraf CG, Green EJ, Hurwitz BE, Morikawa E, Dietrich WD, McCabe PM, Ginsberg MD, Schneiderman N. Sensorimotor and cognitive consequences of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Res. 1992;575:238246.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Stroemer RP, Kent TA, Hulsebosch CE. Enhanced
neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioral recovery
with D-amphetamine therapy after neocortical infarction in
rats. Stroke. 1998;29:23812395.
35. Bland S, Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, Williams L, Strong R, Aronowski J, Grotta J, Schallert T. Forced overuse of the contralateral forelimb increases infarct volume following a mild, but not a severe, transient cerebral ischemic insult. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1998;24:774.14.
36.
Colbourne F, Auer RN, Sutherland GR. Behavioral
testing does not exacerbate ischemic CA1 damage in gerbils.
Stroke. 1998;29:19671971.
37. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:17911794.[Abstract]
38.
Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W.
Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor
skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J
Neurophysiol. 1998;79:21192148.
39. Stoltz S, Humm JL, Schallert T. Cortical injury impairs contralateral forelimb immobility during swimming: a simple test for loss of inhibitory motor control. Behav Brain Res. 1999;106:127132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Hart CL, Davis GW, Barth TM. Forced activity facilitates recovery of function following cortical lesions in rats. Natl Neurotr Soc Abstr. 1997;101.
41.
Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, and Law WA. Amphetamine,
haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after
motor cortex injury. Science. 1982;217:855857.
42. Tillerson JL, Castro SL, Zigmond MJ, Schallert T. Motor rehabilitation of forelimb use in a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rat model of Parkinsons disease. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1998;24:672.18.
43.
Belayev L, Alonso OF, Busto R, Zhao W, Ginsberg
MD. Middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat by intraluminal suture:
neurological and pathological evaluation of an improved model.
Stroke. 1996;27:16161622.
44. Sapolsky RM. Glucocorticoids, hippocampal damage and the glutamatergic synapse. Prog Brain Res. 1990;86:1322.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Sapolsky RM, Pulsinelli WA. Glucocorticoids potentiate
ischemic injury to neurons: therapeutic implications.
Science. 1985;229:13971400.
46. Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, Bland ST, James DC, Schallert T. Use-dependent exaggeration of brain damage: is glutamate involved? Exp Neurol. 1999;157:349358.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Bland ST, Gonzales RA, Schallert T. Movement-related glutamate levels in rat hippocampus, striatum, and sensorimotor cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1999;277:119122.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Eysel UT. Perilesional cortical dysfunction and reorganization. In: Freund HJ, Sabel BA, Witte OW, eds. Brain Plasticity: Advances in Neurology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:195206.
49. Schiene K, Bruehl C, Zilles K, Qu M, Hagemann G, Kraemer M, Witte OW. Neuronal hyperexcitability and reduction of GABA receptor expression in the surround of cerebral thrombosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:906914.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Vargo J, Marshall JF. Unilateral frontal cortex ablation producing neglect causes time-dependent changes in striatal glutamate receptors. Behav Brain Res.. 1996;77:189199.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Qü M, Mittman T, Luhmann HL, Schleicher A, Zilles K. Long-term changes of ionotropic glutamate and GABA receptors after unilateral permanent focal cerebral ischemia in the mouse brain. Neuroscience. 1998;85:2943.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Departments of Psychology and Neurosciences The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-noradrenergic receptors or reducing
noradrenaline release slows spontaneous
recovery.R2 Data from a few controlled clinical
studiesR2 R3 appear promising in their support of this
approach. Evaluation of the assumptions and hypotheses guiding
rehabilitation medicine by controlled experiments, development of
laboratory models, and interaction with other disciplines is essential,
or the field will stagnate. One of the earliest reports on the rehabilitation of hemiplegic stroke patients was published in 1915R4 and described improved outcome after passive and assisted movements of paretic limbs. This remains the routine method for rehabilitation of hemiplegic patients. An important change in this rehabilitation was the forcing of movements from the patient. In constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy,R5 patients are forced to use the affected limb through restraint of the unaffected limb in a sling for 2 weeks and use of reward training to shape additional movements of the affected limb. Reportedly, CI is effective when initiated late after infarct, and improvement is attributed to changing the "learned disuse" of the paretic limb. However, there are no data to support a learning hypothesis, and even when alternate movement strategies are used, this does not exclude the involvement of other mechanisms.
The accompanying article by Bland et al extends the approach used by constraint but describes an unexpected deleterious effects on outcome when intense, forced movement of the affected limb is conducted early after stroke. Limiting use of the unaffected limb by a plaster casting of the unaffected forelimb forces exclusive use of the affected limb. When done early after ischemia involving sensorimotor cortex, it produces a worsening of symptoms. Using the same forced use procedure after other types of injury, they and others reported both an increased injury volume and slower functional recovery. However, in this study of ischemia there was a worsening of symptoms without any increase in the extent of ischemic damage. To account for the dissociation of forced use producing slower recovery without increasing lesion volume, the authors note that the area of ischemia was too large to detect increased cell death. While such an account is feasible, it is possible to infer that there is no causal relation between the exaggerated cell death and slower functional outcome. It seems unlikely that neurons, so close to the threshold for death that they die from behavioral pressure, make any contribution to recovery. It seems likely that the early behavioral demands are killing marginally alive neurons by the increased behavioral pressure pushing the cell into energy failure when it is unable to maintain ionic homeostasis. If measures of cerebral metabolism were taken during this behavior, it is likely to evoke a much greater amount of glucose utilization, and a more severe and widespread pos injury hypometabolism would be observed. Such a demand could expand the area or increase the severity of hypometabolism early after stroke and correlate with the slower behavioral recovery.
By measuring brain temperature and the stress hormone cortisone and finding no increases during forced use of the affected limb early after ischemia, these nonspecific factors were excluded from any role in the period of neuronal vulnerability early after brain injury. It may be useful to compare the period of postischemic vulnerability revealed by forced use to another method, ischemic tolerance,7 which also shows a transient vulnerability after ischemia. Repetition of ischemic events given at short time intervals of 1 hour or less displays a cumulative response. Two sublethal ischemic challenges, when spaced at a short interval, can add up to lethal levels. However, at intervals of at least 24 hours, ischemic tolerance is observed. If a sublethal ischemic challenge is administered and followed in 25 hours by a lethal insult, the tissue will show a diminished reaction to the second event. Thus, the factors producing early postischemic vulnerability to subsequent challenges may represent the beginning of a vulnerable period terminated when subsequent challenges are no longer cumulative but attenuated. Sublethal ischemia stops most protein synthesis in neurons but induces synthesis of "heat-shock proteins," which are thought to play a role in maintaining the health of the neurons. The period of suppressed protein synthesis may be related to the vulnerability to behavioral pressure discussed by Bland et al. Some consideration of the parallels between these responses may be worthwhile, as both are altered by MK-801 and alter neurons in the penumbra of focal ischemia.
Received November 10, 1999; revision received January 19, 2000; accepted February 28, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Feeney DM. Rehabilitation pharmacology: noradrenergic enhancement of physical therapy. In: Ginsberg M, Bogousslavsky J, eds. Cerebrovascular Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. Vol I. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Scientific Press; 1998:620636.
3. Feeney DM. From laboratory to clinic: noradrenergic enhancement of physical therapy for stroke or trauma patients. In: Freund H-J, Sabel BA, Witte OW, eds. Brain Plasticity: Advances in Neurology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997;73:383394.
4. Franz SI, Scheetz ME, Wilson AA. The possibility of recovery of motor functioning in long-standing hemiplegia. JAMA.. 1915;65:21502154.
5. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, Flor H. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.. 1999;80:624628.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Kirino T. Ischemic tolerance. In: Ginsberg M, Bogousslavsky J, eds. Cerebrovascular Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. Vol I. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Scientific Press; 1998:620636.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. W. Dromerick, C. E. Lang, R. L. Birkenmeier, J. M. Wagner, J. P. Miller, T. O. Videen, W. J. Powers, S. L. Wolf, and D. F. Edwards Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT Neurology, July 21, 2009; 73(3): 195 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Boake, E. A. Noser, T. Ro, S. Baraniuk, M. Gaber, R. Johnson, E. T. Salmeron, T. M. Tran, J. M. Lai, E. Taub, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Early Stroke Rehabilitation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Church, C. Price, A. D. Pandyan, S. Huntley, R. Curless, and H. Rodgers Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Surface Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to the Shoulder After Acute Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2995 - 3001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Comi, M. V. Johnston, and M. A. Wilson Immature Mouse Unilateral Carotid Ligation Model of Stroke J Child Neurol, December 1, 2005; 20(12): 980 - 983. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hesse, C. Werner, M. Pohl, S. Rueckriem, J. Mehrholz, and M.L. Lingnau Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 1960 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Grotta, E. A. Noser, T. Ro, C. Boake, H. Levin, J. Aronowski, and T. Schallert Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11_suppl_1): 2699 - 2701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-R. Schabitz, C. Berger, R. Kollmar, M. Seitz, E. Tanay, M. Kiessling, S. Schwab, and C. Sommer Effect of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Treatment and Forced Arm Use on Functional Motor Recovery After Small Cortical Ischemia Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 992 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Lindner, V. K. Gribkoff, N. A. Donlan, and T. A. Jones Long-Lasting Functional Disabilities in Middle-Aged Rats with Small Cerebral Infarcts J. Neurosci., November 26, 2003; 23(34): 10913 - 10922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Aronowski, R. Strong, A. Shirzadi, and J. C. Grotta Ethanol Plus Caffeine (Caffeinol) for Treatment of Ischemic Stroke: Preclinical Experience Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1246 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. DeBow, M. L.A. Davies, H. L. Clarke, and F. Colbourne Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Rehabilitation Exercises Lessen Motor Deficits and Volume of Brain Injury After Striatal Hemorrhagic Stroke in Rats Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 1021 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Tillerson, A. D. Cohen, W. M. Caudle, M. J. Zigmond, T. Schallert, and G. W. Miller Forced Nonuse in Unilateral Parkinsonian Rats Exacerbates Injury J. Neurosci., August 1, 2002; 22(15): 6790 - 6799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Tillerson, A. D. Cohen, J. Philhower, G. W. Miller, M. J. Zigmond, and T. Schallert Forced Limb-Use Effects on the Behavioral and Neurochemical Effects of 6-Hydroxydopamine J. Neurosci., June 15, 2001; 21(12): 4427 - 4435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Dromerick, D. F. Edwards, and M. Hahn Does the Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Acute Rehabilitation Reduce Arm Impairment After Ischemic Stroke? Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 2984 - 2988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |