(Stroke. 2000;31:1365.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology (I.M., J.K.), Toneyama National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Bobath Memorial Hospital (T.S.), Osaka, Japan; and Department of Neurology and Neuroscience (B.T.V.), Cornell University Medical College, The Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY.
Correspondence to Ichiro Miyai, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Toneyama National Hospital, 5-1-1, Toneyama, Toyonaka City, Osaka, 560-8552, Japan. E-mail webeo{at}ga2.so-net.ne.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsPatients who were nonambulatory with hemorrhagic stroke in the internal capsule and putamen (n=55), the thalamus (n=24), or all 3 regions (n=15) underwent intensive inpatient rehabilitation. Patients with surgical intervention or an episode of ventricular hemorrhage were excluded. Lesion location was evaluated by MRI 4 months after the ictus.
ResultsDemographic data, initial disability, and impairment measures were comparable in the 3 groups. Functional outcome demonstrated significant differences in mobility subscores (P<0.05) of the Functional Independence Measure such that patients with injury in the 3 regions were more likely to ambulate independently than were patients in the other groups. Lesion location data demonstrated that the ventral anterior nucleus of the thalamus was always spared; the ventral posterior (lateral and medial) nucleus was always damaged, and the ventral lateral nucleus was frequently damaged. Putaminal damage always included the postcommissural area. In addition, the entire posterior half limb of the internal capsule was always damaged.
ConclusionsSubcortical lesions to multiple structures in the basal gangliathalamocortical motor circuits permitted enhanced motor recovery. Lesion location predicted the level of independent ambulation and the rate of recovery in patients with stroke who were nonambulatory before neurorehabilitation therapy.
Key Words: cerebral hemorrhage putamen rehabilitation thalamus
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The location and distribution of the lesion were specified with MRI (1.0-T superconductive; Shimadzu, MAGNEX Epios10, 8.5 mm, slice thickness) that included T2-weighted (repetition time 3630 ms, echo time 110 ms) axial spin echo images and T1-weighted (repetition time 500 ms, echo time 15 ms) axial spin echo images. MRIs were taken an average of 4 months after the ictus. The rationale for this timing is delineated later. On the basis of image anatomic information, patients were divided into 3 groups: those with damage to the Pt (n=55), Th (n=24), and Pt and Th (P+T; n=15). Lesion volume was calculated with NIH Image Version 1.60.9
There is information about the change in hemorrhage size over time with CT images15 ; less information is available for MRIs, so in 7 patients, we evaluated the change in the size of the hematoma with serial T1- and T2-weighted images taken on admission and repeated every 2 months. Lesion density maps for each patient were made with the use of standardized horizontal templates16 and NIH Image 1.60.
At Bobath Memorial Hospital, all patients participated in
rehabilitation according to the standards of the neurodevelopmental
technique, which includes one 45-minute session of physical therapy and
one 45-minute session of occupational therapy, 5 days a
week.13 17 On admission and discharge, functional outcome
was evaluated with the use of standardized measures of documented
reliability: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for
disability18 and the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set
(SIAS) for neurological impairment.19 20 We also
analyzed motor and cognition subscores of FIM. Motor subscores
of SIAS (0 to 25) consist of 2 tests for the upper extremity (0 to 10)
and 3 tests for the lower extremity (0 to 15). Sensory subscores of
SIAS (0 to 12) evaluate superficial sensation and deep sensation of the
affected upper (0 to 6) and lower (0 to 6) extremities. The sitting
balance subscore of SIAS ranges from 0 (cannot sit without support) to
3 (normal sitting balance). Trained nurses rated the FIM, and
physicians, who were blinded to lesion location, rated the SIAS. FIM
evaluation was performed every 2 to 3 weeks, and when FIM score reached
a plateau, the patient was discharged. Interrater reliability for
individual items of SIAS and FIM was estimated with the use of a
weighted
statistic (n=16).,21 and the correlation
among raters was good to very good (
=0.62 to 0.93). Spearman
correlation coefficients across the raters were significant for total
SIAS score (0.944, P<0.0005) and total FIM score (0.973,
P<0.005). These reliability measures have been used and
tested previously.9
Because of the interval impairment and disability outcome measures, the
statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis
test. Demographic data were analyzed with ANOVA and
2 test. Changes in lesion volume was
analyzed with a repeated measures ANOVA followed by a post hoc
test (Fishers least significant difference test). The level of
significance was accepted at P<0.05. All statistical
analyses were performed with the use of SPSS for Microsoft
Windows, version 8.0J.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Demographic data are shown in Table 2
. Mean age, days after
stroke, length of stay, Mini-Mental State Examination, sex, and
location of lesion were comparable in the 3 groups. All patients had
hemiparesis and hemisensory deficits (as scored on the
sensory subscale of SIAS). All patients in the Th and P+T groups and
most of the patients in the Pt group had spastic hemiparesis. Six of 55
patients in the Pt group had flaccid hemiparesis.
Baseline scores of FIM and SIAS on admission and gain after inpatient
rehabilitation are shown in Table 3
. The
Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated that the groups were comparable on
admission impairment and disability scales. By discharge, the
analysis revealed significant differences among the groups on
disability measures but not impairment measures. Specifically, there
was a significant difference in the gain of mobility subscore of FIM,
and there were no significant differences in the gain of total FIM
scores, ADL subscores, cognition subscores, motor scores of SIAS, SIAS
for sensation, and SIAS for sitting balance. Subsequent Mann-Whitney
test showed that the gain in mobility subscore of FIM was significantly
higher in the P+T group than in the Th group (P<0.05).
There was a trend indicating the P+T group also gained more on the
mobility subscore than the Pt group (P=0.058).
|
These statistical changes have clinical relevance in that 53.3% (8 of
15) of the P+T group were independent in ADL and mobility on discharge,
whereas these levels of functional independence were attained by only
41.8% in the P group and 33.3% in the T group. Because ambulation was
crucial for a discharge to home instead of a long-term care facility,
we performed an additional analysis on the probability that the
lesion site predicted independent ambulation. The probability of
ambulation without physical assistance was 60% (33 of 55) in the Pt
group, 62.5% (15 of 24) in the Th group, and 93.3% (14 of 15) in the
P+T group (
2, P<0.05).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the present data cannot specify the mechanism by which combined damage to the Pt and Th (the P+T group) leads to enhanced functional outcome, there are a number of candidate regions crucial for reorganization that were not damaged. In the study patients, the areas that were commonly intact include the PMC, SMA, caudate, globus pallidus, the nucleus ventralis anterior of the Th, and the anterior limb of the internal capsule. Functional imaging information1 2 3 4 and neurophysiological studies of dystonia26 demonstrate that damage in the basal ganglia and Th caused reorganization of cortical function, especially in the PMC and SMA. To these intact anterior motor pathways, there also are intact ipsilateral pathways in the unaffected hemisphere. Recent functional MRI studies of motor recovery demonstrated that 65% to 75% of patients with volumetrically larger lesions had ipsilateral hemisphere activation.6 7 Indeed, the study of motor recovery after stroke with the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation studies has also demonstrated the activation of both contralateral and ipsilateral connections.27 Because the regions of potential reorganization (cortical, subcortical, and anterior limbs of the internal capsule) were common to all 3 groups, it may be that the greater volume of subcortical damage acts to stimulate more effective reorganization. There are emerging precedents for this possibility.10 11 28
Disability measures, FIM mobility scores, and ambulation demonstrated greater improvement in P+T than in Pt or Th, but there were no significant differences in the change in impairment scores. Our previous report demonstrated that disability recovery might occur without a change in impairment.12 In fact, there are several precedents for significant reduction in disability without change in impairment score.29 30 In general, rehabilitation efforts have been concerned with compensation for function rather than amelioration of neurological deficit. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of disability grows, it may be possible to focus on changing the level of impairment, too.31 32 33
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 9, 1999; revision received March 6, 2000; accepted March 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, Wise RJS, Frackowiak RSJ. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:463472.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJS, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:181189.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Weiller C, Chollet F, Frackowiak RSJ. Physiologic aspects of functional recovery from stroke. In: Ginsberg MD, Bogousslavsky J. Cerebrovascular Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Science; 1998:20572067.
5. Binkofski F, Seitz RJ, Arnold S, Classen J, Benecke R, Freund H-J. Thalamic metabolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol. 1996;39:460470.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD,
Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional
MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke.
Stroke. 1997;28:25182527.
7.
Cao Y, DOlhaberriague L, Vikingstad EM, Levine SR,
Welch KMA. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation
of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke. 1998;29:112122.
8.
Seitz RJ. H
flich P, Binkofski F, Tellmann L,
Hezog H, Freund H-J. Role of premotor cortex in recovery from middle
cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:10811088.
9.
Miyai I, Suzuki T, Kang J, Kubota K, Volpe BT. Middle
cerebral artery stroke that includes the premotor cortex reduces
mobility outcome. Stroke. 1999;30:13801383.
10. Alexander RL, Crutcher MD. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:266271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Fries W, Danek A, Scheidtmann, Hamburger C. Motor
recovery following capsular stroke: role of descending pathways from
multiple areas. Brain. 1993;116:369382.
12.
Miyai I, Blau AD, Reding MJ, Volpe BT. Patients with
stroke confined to basal ganglia have diminished response to
rehabilitation efforts. Neurology. 1997;48:95101.
13. Miyai I, Suzuki T, Kii K, Kang J, Kajiura I. Functional outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in chronic stroke. J Neurol Rehabil. 1998;12:9599.
14.
Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following
initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:13541358.
15.
Franke CL. van Swieten JC, van Gijn J. Residual lesions
on computed tomography after intracerebral
hemorrhage. Stroke. 1991;22:15301533.
16. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. New York, NY: Thieme; 1988.
17. Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment, ed 2. London, England: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd; 1978.
18. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation: Vol 2. New York, NY: Springer; 1987:618.
19. Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Kimura A. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS): a new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 1994;31:119125.
20. Sonoda S, Chino N, Domen K, Saitoh E. Changes in impairment and disability from the third to the sixth month after stroke and its relationship evaluated by an artificial neural network. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76:395400.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992;304:14911494.
22.
Miyai I, Suzuki T, Kii K, Kang J, Kubota K. Wallerian
degeneration of the pyramidal tract does not affect stroke
rehabilitation outcome. Neurology. 1998;51:16131616.
23.
Kumral E, Kocaer T, Ertübey NO, Kumral K.
Thalamic hemorrhage: a prospective study of 100 patients.
Stroke. 1995;26:964970.
24.
Mori S, Sadoshima S, Ibayashi S, Fujishima M. Impact of
thalamic hematoma on six-month mortality and motor and cognitive
outcome. Stroke. 1995;26:620626.
25. Chung CS, Caplan LR, Han W, Pessin MS, Lee KH, Kim JM. Thalamic hemorrhage. Brain. 1996;119:19731886.
26.
Hallet M. The neurophysiology of dystonia. Arch
Neurol. 1998;55:601603.
27. Hallet M, Wassermann EM, Cohen LG, Chmielowska J, Gerloff C. Cortical mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1998;10:131142.
28. Parent A, Hazrati LN. Functional anatomy of basal ganglia, I: the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop. Brain Res Rev. 1995;20:91127.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM, Robinson M. Effect of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970;51:526531.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, McGuire JR, Diaz S. Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:329335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. In press.
32.
Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C,
Aisen M. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke
maintained over three years. Neurology. 1999;53:18741876.
33.
Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The
effect of robot assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor
recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:443446.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. D. Alexander, S. E. Black, K. K. Patterson, F. Gao, C. J. Danells, and W. E. McIlroy Association Between Gait Asymmetry and Brain Lesion Location in Stroke Patients Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 537 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M.S. Nys, M. J.E. van Zandvoort, P. L.M. de Kort, H. B. van der Worp, B. P.W. Jansen, A. Algra, E. H.F. de Haan, and L. J. Kappelle The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke Neurology, March 8, 2005; 64(5): 821 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kobayashi, H. Takayama, S. Suga, B. Mihara, G. A. Rosenberg, and W. M. Brooks Longitudinal Changes of Metabolites in Frontal Lobes After Hemorrhagic Stroke of Basal Ganglia: A Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study Editorial Comment: A Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study Stroke, October 1, 2001; 32(10): 2237 - 2245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |