(Stroke. 2001;32:77.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Cardiovascular Health Branch (A.M.M., J.B.C.), Division of Adult and Community Health (W.H.G.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga; Departments of Neurology (M.A.W., R.F.M., S.J.K) and Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (P.D.S., T.R.P., S.J.K.), University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, Md; Department of Neurology (R.J.W., C.J.J., C.J.E., D.W.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md; Department of Neurology (B.J.S.), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga; Department of Neuroscience (M.A.S.), Harbin Clinic, Rome, Ga; Department of Epidemiology (R.S.), Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, La; and the Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (S.J.K., R.F.M), Baltimore Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Ann Malarcher, Cardiovascular Health Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MS K-47, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341. E-mail aym8{at}cdc.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsAll 59 hospitals in the greater Baltimore-Washington area participated in a population-based case-control study of stroke in young women. Case patients (n=224) were aged 15 to 44 years with a first cerebral infarction, and control subjects (n=392), identified by random-digit dialing, were frequency matched by age and region of residence. The interview assessed lifetime alcohol consumption and consumption and beverage type in the previous year, week, and day. ORs were obtained from logistic regression models controlling for age, race, education, and smoking status, with never drinkers as the referent.
ResultsAlcohol
consumption, up to 24 g/d, in the past year was associated with fewer
ischemic strokes (<12 g/d: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86; 12
to 24 g/d: OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.86; >24 g/d: OR 0.95, 95% CI
0.43 to 2.10) in comparison to never drinking. Analyses of
beverage type (beer, wine, liquor) indicated a protective effect for
wine consumption in the previous year (<12 g/wk: OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35
to 0.97; 12 g/wk to <12 g/d: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.10;
12 g/d:
OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.64).
ConclusionsLight to moderate alcohol consumption appears to be associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke in young women.
Key Words: alcohol drinking cerebral infarction young adults
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In general, these relationships have not been explored among young adults, who are likely to have different patterns of alcohol consumption and etiologies of stroke and may have a different relationship between alcohol intake and stroke than older adults. Therefore, we undertook the current study to examine the relationship between alcohol consumption, type of beverage, and ischemic stroke among women 15 to 44 years of age who participated in the Stroke Prevention in Young Women Study.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Face-to-face interviews were conducted with both case patients and controls (or a proxy if the participant was unable to answer; n=22) to assess demographic (age, race, and educational level), medical (history of hypertension, diabetes, angina, and myocardial infarction), and lifestyle (current smoking status and alcohol use) characteristics. Blood samples were obtained at the conclusion of the interview.
The questionnaire asked about lifetime alcohol use (Have you had more than 12 drinks of any kind of alcoholic beverage in any 1 year of your lifetime?) and alcohol use in the previous year (During the year prior to your stroke [or day of interview, for controls], did you drink any wine, beer, or drinks like vodka, whiskey, or gin?). Participants who reported never consuming more than 12 alcoholic drinks in any 1 year were classified as never drinkers. Former drinkers were those who reported ever drinking more than 12 alcoholic drinks in a year but who had not used alcohol in the past year. Current drinkers were defined as those who used alcohol in the past year.
Among current drinkers, average alcohol intake in the past year was estimated from responses to separate questions on frequency (ie, "How often did you usually drink beer?" recorded as number of times per day, week, month, or year) and quantity of drinks per occasion of light beer (bottles/cans), beer (bottles/cans), wine (glasses), or hard liquor (shots) (ie, "On each occasion that you drank beer, how much did you usually have?"). Separate questions for each type of alcohol assessed the number of drinks consumed in the past week and in the past 24 hours (ie, "In the week before your stroke how much beer did you have?"). To estimate average alcohol intake in grams per day, we assumed that 1 bottle/can of light beer contained 11.3 g of alcohol, 1 bottle/can of beer contained 12.8 g, 1 glass of wine contained 9.6 g, and 1 shot of hard liquor contained 15.1 g.10 Average amount of alcohol intake in the past year and past week were categorized as <12 g/d, 12 to 24 g/d, and >24 g/d. These categories reflect current recommendations on alcohol consumption and coronary heart disease and stroke.11 12
Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, angina, and myocardial
infarction were determined by asking if the participant had ever been
told by a physician that she had the condition. Body mass index (BMI)
was also based on self-report and calculated as the weight in kilograms
divided by the square of the height in meters. Total
cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were measured
according to standard
practices.13 14
Total cholesterol was considered high at
240 mg/dL. HDL
cholesterol was considered low at
35 mg/dL.
2 tests were used to test for
differences in the distributions of the demographic, medical, and
lifestyle characteristics between cases and controls. The relationship
between alcohol use and ischemic stroke was examined by
estimating ORs from logistic regression models for current, former, and
never drinkers, and, among current drinkers, for the amount of alcohol
use in the past year and the past week, and any use in the past 24
hours. For the logistic regression analyses, three models were
estimated; model 1 included only alcohol use; model 2, in addition to
alcohol use, included age, race, educational level (less than high
school versus greater than high school education), and smoking status
(current versus noncurrent); and model 3 included all of the
variables in model 2 as well as BMI, total cholesterol,
HDL cholesterol, history of hypertension, history of
diabetes, and history of coronary heart disease. The
variables contained in model 2 have been identified in other
analyses as important confounders of the relationship between
alcohol consumption and
stroke.2 The additional
variables in model 3 include potential mediators of the causal
association between alcohol and stroke. Never drinkers served as the
referent category for all logistic regression models.
The effects of type of alcohol used in the past year and in the past week on ischemic stroke were also examined. To determine the effect of any use, 3 variables were created for any beer, wine, and hard liquor consumption. For these analyses, all logistic regression models also contained average daily alcohol consumption (in grams per day) and average daily alcohol consumption squared.
For alcohol intake in the past year, the relationship
between the average amount of each type of beverage consumed and stroke
was also examined. For each type of beverage, 3 dummy variables for
average intake (<12 g/wk, 12 g/wk to <12 g/d,
12 g/d) were included
in the logistic regression models. Few women reported an average
consumption of each beverage of 12 to 24 g/d or >24 g/d; therefore,
the above categories were selected to reflect their lower levels of
intake.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Among the controls, current drinkers were more likely than
never drinkers to be 40 years of age or older, to have less than a high
school education, and to be current smokers
(P<0.01 for all 3
2 tests). Current drinkers were less
likely than never drinkers to be black
(P<0.001). When type of
beverage among current drinkers was examined, differences in the other
risk factors for stroke primarily existed between wine drinkers and
nonwine drinkers. Women who drank wine were less likely than nonwine
drinkers to have less than a high school education (6.2% versus
22.2%, P<0.01), to be current
smokers (27.1% versus 55.6%,
P<0.01), or to have a high
cholesterol level (9.5% versus 21.3%,
P=0.03). Women who consumed
hard liquor in the past year were more likely to be current smokers
than those who did not drink hard liquor (38.9% versus 16.7%,
P<0.01).
For most of the comparisons, the results of logistic
regression analyses controlling for age, race, education, and
smoking status (model 2) were similar to the results of unadjusted
analyses (model 1)
(Table 2
). Overall, current drinkers had an almost 40%
lower risk of stroke than never drinkers (model 2 OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42
to 0.91). Former drinking was not related to stroke among these young
women. ORs indicated that women who drank, on average,
24 g of
alcohol per day during the past year had a lower risk of stroke than
never drinkers (model 2 OR 0.57 for <12 g/d, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86;
model 2 OR 0.38 for 12 to 24 g/d, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.86).
|
The beneficial effect on the risk of stroke of drinking <24 g of alcohol per day was confirmed when weekly intake was examined. Women who drank in the past week and whose average intake for the week was <12 g of alcohol per day had an almost 60% lower stroke risk than never drinkers (model 2 OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.67). Women who drank 12 to 24 g/d, on average, during the past week also had a lower risk than never drinkers, but this comparison was not statistically significant (model 2 OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.54). Drinking alcohol in the past 24 hours was not related to stroke. Among women who drank alcohol in the past week, both those who drank in the past 24 hours (model 2 OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.94) and those who did not drink in the past 24 hours (model 2 OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.71) had a lower risk of stroke than never drinkers.
Adjustment for BMI, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and history of hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart disease increased the ORs for the majority of categories of alcohol intake, and the confidence intervals overlapped 1.0. For example, the ORs from the fully adjusted model (model 3) for women who drank alcohol in the past week and whose intake was <12 g of alcohol per day was 0.63 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.06). Overall, these risk factors explained almost half (47%) of the relationship between current drinking and stroke.
ORs from logistic regression analyses that included
type of alcoholic beverage consumed, in addition to average amount
consumed, indicated a negative association for wine drinking
(Table 3
). For consumption in the past year, women who
reported consuming wine had almost one-half the risk of stroke compared
with never drinkers across all three logistic regression models (ie,
model 3 OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.98). Any beer and hard liquor
consumption in the past year was not statistically significantly
associated with ischemic stroke.
|
When type of beverage in the past year was stratified by
amount of intake, a negative association for wine intake was observed
among women whose average wine consumption was <12 g/d. The OR for an
average wine consumption of <12 g/wk during the past year was
statistically significant in the model adjusting for age, race,
education, and smoking status (model 2 OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.97).
The corresponding OR comparing women who drank between 12 g/wk and <12
g/d to never drinkers was 0.55 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.10). The relationship
between beer consumption and stroke was inconsistent, and none
of the ORs were statistically significant. ORs for hard liquor
consumption indicated that women whose average consumption was
12
g/wk had a higher risk of stroke than never drinkers; however, the ORs
from model 2 were not statistically significant (OR for 12 g/wk to <12
g/d: 1.31, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.50; OR for
12 g/d: 1.47, 95% CI 0.57 to
3.78). Further adjustment for BMI, total cholesterol, HDL
cholesterol, and history of hypertension, coronary
heart disease, and diabetes did not substantially modify the ORs for
wine consumption (ie, model 3 OR for wine consumption of <12 g/wk:
0.56, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.04); ORs for liquor consumption increased and
became statistically significant for intake of 12 g/wk to <12 g/d
(model 3 OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.15 to 5.57).
When type of beverage in the past week was examined, ORs indicated a negative association with all types of beverages, although these were generally nonsignificant.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The negative association between light to moderate alcohol
consumption and ischemic stroke has also been observed in
studies of older
adults.1 2 3 4 5
The ORs from this study were similar to those from a case-control study
of ischemic stroke among a multiethnic elderly population (mean
age of stroke patients was 70 years) in Manhattan,
NY.3 In that study, the OR
for persons with an average alcohol consumption of
2 drinks/d in the
past year compared with nondrinkers was 0.55 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.72) for
the total population and 0.44 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.75) for those aged
<65 years, after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, hypertension,
diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, cigarette smoking, and education.
Similarly, a case-control study of men and women aged 40 to 85 years in
Asturias, Spain, reported an OR of 0.53 for cerebral infarction among
those consuming <30 g/d compared with nondrinkers, after adjusting for
age, smoking, hypertension,
hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and cardiac
disease.5 In summarizing the
literature,
Camargo1 2 observed
that the risk of ischemic stroke appeared to be 50% to 70%
lower among light to moderate drinkers from the United States, but that
studies in Japanese populations had uniformly observed no association
between alcohol consumption and ischemic
stroke.2 He speculated that
effect modification with race/ethnicity might be occurring because of
racial/ethnic differences in cultural practices associated with
drinking, diet (ie, the low intake of animal fat among the Japanese),
or other risk factors. The distribution of cerebral
atherosclerosis may also differ; the small intracranial
arteries may be more affected among the Japanese while the large
extracranial neck arteries may be more affected among
whites.15 16
However, no difference in the relationship between alcohol consumption
and cerebrovascular hospitalizations was found for blacks and whites in
California,17 and alcohol
consumption among blacks, Hispanics, and whites showed similar
relationships with ischemic stroke in the Manhattan
case-control study.3 In our
study there were no statistically significant interactions between race
(black versus white) and alcohol use. We could not assess whether the
relationship with alcohol intake varied by ischemic stroke
subtype due to limited numbers; however, excluding lacunar strokes
(n=22) from the analysis did not substantial modify the
ORs.
The majority of studies have found that heavy drinking,
using several definitions (
42 U/wk,
7 drinks/d,
140 g/d), is a
risk factor for ischemic
stroke.1 2 3 4 5
The lack of association with drinking >24 g/d in our study is probably
due to the low levels of intake among women; for example, only 8 women
consumed on average
60 g/d. Drinking in the past 24 hours was also
not related to stroke risk. As expected from their reports of past-year
intake, only 7 case patients and 2 controls reported drinking
5
drinks in the past 24 hours; therefore, recent heavy intake could not
be assessed. Recent heavy alcohol intake has been shown to be a risk
factor for stroke in several
studies.1 2
In logistic regression models controlling for total intake, wine consumption was negatively associated with stroke whereas beer and liquor were not strongly related to stroke. Similar relationships were reported in a cohort study of men and women aged 45 to 84 years in Copenhagen, Denmark.4 In contrast, the Manhattan study reported negative associations for all beverage types when monthly drinkers were classified by predominant beverage type.3 Although some studies have found an additional negative association between wine consumption and coronary heart disease risk, the majority of studies have not supported a strong role of beverage choice in risk of heart disease.18 19
Alcohol consumption increases HDL cholesterol, prostacyclin-thromboxane ratios, and tissue insulin sensitivity and decreases platelet aggregation and fibrinogen levels.20 21 Alcohol may also reduce cardiovascular risk by decreasing vascular muscle cell proliferation during the postprandial phase.22 In contrast, alcohol can lead to increased stroke risk through increased blood pressure, alcohol-induced cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and cerebral vasoconstriction and spasm.23 24 Apart from the effects of total alcohol consumption, wine may have additional benefits for ischemic stroke due to the presence of antioxidant flavonoids.6 24 25 In our study, the association between wine intake and ischemic risk was only slightly modified by the inclusion in the logistic regression models of HDL cholesterol and history of hypertension or other coronary disease, which suggests that the measured variables were not responsible for the effect of wine. As in all observational studies, it remains possible that the protective association of wine drinking with ischemic stroke is due to other unmeasured factors associated with wine drinking. Because wine drinking may occur more frequently with meals, it is unclear whether the protective effect for ischemic stroke risk is due to specific components in wine or whether it is related to the timing of wine consumption. Future research is needed to determine the mechanisms of wines effects and whether fruit and fruit juice consumption produces similar effects.
This study has several limitations. Our definition of never drinkers (ie, women who never consumed >12 drinks per year in their lives) most likely includes some women who were infrequent drinkers. The inclusion of infrequent drinkers in the never drinker category would cause the ORs for moderate alcohol intake to be underestimated.
Although the 1-year time period for reporting alcohol consumption is not long, recall bias may have occurred. The time period for recalling alcohol intake was longer among case patients than among controls, since case patients were asked to recall intake 1 year, 1 week, and 1 day before their stroke and were interviewed, on average, 5 months (and up to 1 year) after their stroke. Controls were asked about their alcohol intake relative to the date of their interview. Case patients may have altered their drinking habits after their stroke. It is unclear whether women who experienced a stroke would be more likely to underreport or overreport their prior intake compared with the controls. However, when we limited the logistic regression analysis to case patients who completed their interviews within 5 months after their stroke, we observed little change in the ORs for both amount of alcohol intake (ORs for average intake of >24 g/d were lower but remained nonsignificant) and type of alcohol consumed (except the OR for average beer intake of 12 g/wk to <12 g/d increased across all 3 models and became statistically significant in model 3: OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.09 to 5.24). Information bias may also be present. The Danish MONICA study26 reported good overall agreement between usual intakes of beer, wine, and liquor from a frequency questionnaire and a detailed dietary history; however, correlations between the instruments were lower for women than men, leading the authors to suggest that women may be uncomfortable answering questions about alcohol intake in an in-person interview.
Most of the major confounders of the alcoholischemic stroke relationship were controlled for in this analysis except for physical activity, which was not assessed in this study.2 Cholesterol levels were measured after the stroke, and therefore may explain more of the relationship between alcohol and stroke than indicated in this study. Residual confounding may still have occurred due to measurement error; this effect would be most pronounced in comparisons involving wine drinkers who had a higher socioeconomic status and more favorable cardiovascular risk factor profile than nonwine drinkers. Abstainers are a unique population, and they may differ from alcohol users in other risk factors for stroke that were not controlled for in this analysis. Similarly, important unmeasured differences may also exist between wine, beer, and liquor drinkers. The effect of drinking pattern was also not assessed. For example, among women classified as drinking on average between 12 and 24 g of alcohol per day, 18% reported daily intake of wine, beer, or liquor, while the remainder reported a weekly intake of wine, beer, or liquor of 1 to 5 times per week. At similar levels of intake, Palomaki and Kaste27 observed a stronger negative association between alcohol consumption and ischemic stroke among regular drinkers than among infrequent drinkers. Our study was limited to women; however, other studies have found no difference between the sexes in the alcoholischemic stroke relationship.2 3
Findings from this study indicate that the National Stroke Associations Stroke Prevention Guidelines on alcohol use11 apply to young adults; drinking in moderation (up to 2 drinks per day) can be recommended for those who drink alcohol and who have no health contraindications. Alcohol use should not be encouraged for those who do not already drink because of the devastating morbidity and mortality associated with heavy use. Further research is needed to determine whether wine consumption has an additional beneficial effect for ischemic stroke and to clarify the biological mechanisms involved.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are indebted to the following members of the Stroke Prevention in Young Women research team for their dedication: Anne Epstein, Barbara Feeser, James Gardner, Mary Keiser, Ann Maher, Jennifer Rohr, Mary J. Seipp, Susan Snyder, Mary J. Sparks, and Nancy Zappala.
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of the following individuals who have sponsored the Stroke Prevention in Young Women Study at their institution: Frank Anderson, MD; Clifford Andrew, MD, PhD; Christopher Bever, MD; Nicholas Buendia, MD; Young Ja Cho, MD; James Christensen, MD; Remzi Demir, MD; Terry Detrich, MD; John Eckholdt, MD; Nirmala Fernback, MD; Jerold Fleishman, MD; Benjamin Frishberg, MD; Stuart Goodman, MD, PhD; Norman Hershkowitz, MD, PhD; Luke Kao, MD, PhD; Mehrullah Khan, MD; Ramesh Khurana, MD; John Kurtzke, MD; William Leahy, MD; William Lightfoote II, MD; Bruce Lobar, MD; Michael Miller, MD, PhD; Harshad Mody, MBBS; Marvin Mordes, MD; Seth Morgan, MD; Howard Moses, MD; Sivarama Nandipati, MD; Mark Ozer, MD; Roger Packer, MD; Thaddeus Pula, MD; Phillip Pulaski, MD; Naghbushan Rao, MD; Marc Raphaelson, MD; Solomon Robbins, MD; David Satinsky, MD; Elijah Saunders, MD; Michael Sellman, MD, PhD; Arthur Siebens, MD (deceased); Harold Stevens, MD, PhD; Dean Tippett, MD; Roger Weir, MD; Michael Weinrich, MD; Richard Weisman, MD; Don Wood, MD (deceased); and Mohammed Yaseen, MD.
In addition, the study could not have been completed without the support from the administration and medical records staff at the following institutions: in Maryland, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Atlantic General Hospital, Bon Secours Hospital, Calvert Memorial Hospital, Carroll County General, Church Hospital Corporation, Doctors Community Hospital, Fallston General Hospital, Franklin Square Hospital Center, Frederick Memorial Hospital, The Good Samaritan Hospital of Maryland Inc, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Harbor Hospital Center, Hartford Memorial Hospital, Holy Cross Hospital, Johns Hopkins Bayview Inc, the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Howard County General Hospital Inc, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Kent and Queen Anne Hospital, Laurel Regional Hospital, Liberty Medical Center Inc, Maryland General Hospital, McCready Memorial Hospital, Memorial Hospital at Easton, Mercy Medical Center, Montebello Rehabilitation Hospital, Montgomery General Hospital, North Arundel Hospital, Northwest Hospital Center, Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Physicians Memorial Hospital, Prince Georges Hospital Center, Saint Agnes Hospital, Saint Joseph Hospital, Saint Marys Hospital, Shady Grove Adventist Hospital, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Southern Maryland Hospital Center, Suburban Hospital, The Union Memorial Hospital, University of Maryland Medical System, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Baltimore, Washington Adventist Hospital, and Washington County.
Received May 30, 2000;
revision received September 18, 2000;
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Camargo CA.
Moderate alcohol consumption and stroke: the epidemiologic evidence.
Stroke. 1998;20:16111626.
3.
Sacco RL, Elkind M,
Boden-Albala B, Lin I, Kargman DE, Hauser WA, Shea S, Paik MC. The
protective effect of moderate alcohol consumption on ischemic
stroke. JAMA. 1999;281:5360.
4.
Truelsen T,
Gronbaek M, Schnohr P, Boysen G. Intake of beer, wine, and spirits and
risk of stroke: the Copenhagen City Heart Study.
Stroke. 1998;29:24672472.
5. Caicoya M, Rodriguez T, Corrales C, Cuello R, Lasheras C. Alcohol and stroke: a community case-control study in Asturias, Spain. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:677684.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Renaud S, Lorgeril M, Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1992;339:15231526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Johnson CJ, Kittner
SJ, McCarter RJ, Sloan MA, Stern BJ, Buchholz D, Price TR. Interrater
reliability of an etiologic classification of ischemic stroke.
Stroke. 1995;26:4651.
8.
Kittner SJ, Stern
BJ, Feeser BR, Hebel R, Nagey DA, Buchholz DW, Earley CJ, Johnson CJ,
Macko RF, Sloan MA, Wityk RJ, Wozniak MA. Pregnancy and the risk of
stroke. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:768774.
9.
Kittner SJ, Stern
BJ, Wozniak M, Buchholz DW, Earley CJ, Feeser BR, Johnson CJ, Macko RF,
McCarter RJ, Price TR, Sherwin R, Sloan MA, Wityk RJ. Cerebral
infarction in young adults: the Baltimore-Washington Cooperative Young
Stroke Study. Neurology. 1998;50:890894.
10. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 1999. USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 13. Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page, http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp. Accessed on February16, 2000.
11.
Gorelick PB,
Sacco RL, Smith DB, Alberts M, Mustone-Alexander L, Rader D, Ross JL,
Raps E, Ozer MN, Brass LM,, Malone ME, Goldberg S, Booss J, Hanley DF,
Toole JF, Greengold NL, Rhew DC. Prevention of a first stroke: a review
of guidelines and a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the
National Stroke Association.
JAMA. 1999;281:11121120.
12.
Pearson T.
Alcohol and heart disease [AHA Science Advisory].
Circulation. 1996;94:30233025.
13. Tietz NE, ed. Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1976.
14. Warnick G, Russell J, Albers JJ. Dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation procedures for quantification of high density-lipoprotein-cholesterol. In: Copper GR, ed. Selected Methods of Clinical Chemistry. Vol 10. Washington, DC: American Association for Clinical Chemistry; 1983:9199.
15.
Kiyohara Y, Kato
I, Iwamoto H, Nakayama K, Fujishima M. The impact of alcohol and
hypertension on stroke incidence in a general Japanese population.
Stroke. 1995;26:368372.
16. Resch JA, Okabe N, Lowewenson RB, Kimoto K, Katsuki S, Baker AB. Pattern of vessel involvement in cerebral atherosclerosis: a comparative study between a Japanese and Minnesota population. J Atheroscler Res. 1969;9:239250.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Klatsky AL,
Armstrong MA, Friedman GD. Alcohol use and subsequent cerebrovascular
disease hospitalizations.
Stroke. 1989;20:741746.
18.
Rimm EB. Alcohol
consumption and coronary heart disease: good habits may be more
important than just good wine. Am J
Epidemiol. 1996;143:10941098.
19. Gaziano JM, Hennekens CH, Godfried SL, Sesso HD, Glynn RJ, Breslow JL, Buring JE. Type of alcoholic beverage and risk of myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:5257.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Gaziano JM,
Buring JE, Breslow JL, Goldhaber SZ, Rosner B, VanDenburgh M, Willet W,
Hennekens CH. Moderate alcohol intake, increased levels of high-density
lipoprotein and its subfractions, and decreased risk of myocardial
infarction. N Engl J
Med. 1993;329:18291834.
21.
Criqui MH, Cowan
LD, Tyroler HA, Bangdiwala S, Heiss G, Wallace RB, Cohn R. Lipoproteins
as mediators for the effects of alcohol consumption and cigarette
smoking and cardiovascular mortality: results from the
Lipid Research Clinics Follow-Up Study.
Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:629637.
22. Locher R, Suter PM, Vetter W. Ethanol suppresses smooth muscle cell proliferation in the postprandial state: a new antiatherosclerotic mechanism of ethanol? Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:338341.[Abstract]
23. Gorelick PB. Alcohol and stroke. Curr Concepts Cardiovasc Dis Stroke. 1986;21:2125.
24. Hillbom M, Oxidants, antioxidants, alcohol and stroke. Front Biosci. 1999;4:e6771.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Frankel EN, Kanner J, German JB, Parks E, Kinsella JE. Inhibition of oxidation of human low-density lipoprotein by phenolic substance in red wine. Lancet. 1993;341:454457.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Gronbaek M, Heitmann BL. Validity of self-reported intakes of wine, beer and spirits in population studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50:487490.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Palomaki H, Kaste
M. Regular light-to-moderate intake of alcohol and the risk of
ischemic stroke: is there a beneficial effect?
Stroke. 1993;24:18281832.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): e873 - e923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Goldstein, R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, T. J. DeGraba, P. B. Gorelick, J. R. Guyton, et al. Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1583 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Sacco, R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, P. Gorelick, J. Halperin, R. Harbaugh, et al. Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): e409 - e449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Sacco, R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, P. Gorelick, J. Halperin, R. Harbaugh, et al. Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 577 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Klatsky Editorial Comment--Alcohol and Stroke: An Epidemiological Labyrinth Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 1835 - 1836. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Mukamal, A. Ascherio, M. A. Mittleman, K. M. Conigrave, C. A. Camargo Jr, I. Kawachi, M. J. Stampfer, W. C. Willett, and E. B. Rimm Alcohol and Risk for Ischemic Stroke in Men: The Role of Drinking Patterns and Usual Beverage Ann Intern Med, January 4, 2005; 142(1): 11 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Nightingale and R. D.T. Farmer Ischemic Stroke in Young Women: A Nested Case-Control Study Using the UK General Practice Research Database Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1574 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Reynolds, L. B. Lewis, J. D. L. Nolen, G. L. Kinney, B. Sathya, and J. He Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Stroke: A Meta-analysis JAMA, February 5, 2003; 289(5): 579 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Di Castelnuovo, S. Rotondo, L. Iacoviello, M. B. Donati, and G. de Gaetano Meta-Analysis of Wine and Beer Consumption in Relation to Vascular Risk Circulation, June 18, 2002; 105(24): 2836 - 2844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Djousse, R. C. Ellison, A. Beiser, A. Scaramucci, R. B. D'Agostino, and P. A. Wolf Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Ischemic Stroke: The Framingham Study Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 907 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |