(Stroke. 2001;32:2486.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Medical Imaging (C.G., A.S., T.D., G.C.), Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, and the Department of Neuroradiology (C.O., C.M.) and Cerebrovascular Emergency Department (Y.S.), Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Université Paris VI, and the Department of Neuroradiology (C.O.), Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris V, Paris, France.
Correspondence to Catherine Oppenheim, MD, Département de Neuroradiologie, CH Sainte-Anne, 1 rue Cabanis, 75674 Paris Cedex 14, France. E-mail oppenheim{at}chsa.broca.inserm.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods We reviewed 48 patients not treated by thrombolytics who had a DWI/PWI within 6 hours after onset, with infarct evolution documented by follow-up magnetic resonance on days 2 to 4. We calculated absolute values for ADC and the ADC ratio (ADCr) in (1) the initial DWI hypersignal; (2) the final volume of the infarct, ie, the follow-up fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormalities; (3) the infarct growth (IGR) area; and (4) the oligemic area (OLI) that remained viable despite initial hemodynamic disturbance. We tested the value of the ADC to predict tissue outcome by using discriminant analysis.
Results ADC values were marginally but significantly decreased in the IGR area (ADC 782±82x10-6 mm2/s, ADCr 0.94±0.08) compared with mirror values (P=0.01) and with OLI (ADC 823±41x10-6 mm2/s, ADCr 0.99±0.07; P=0.001). Of all quantitative DWI and PWI parameters, the ADCr best discriminated between IGR and OLI (F1,50=13.6, cutoff=0.97, 64% sensitivity, 92% specificity) and between the final volume of infarct and OLI (F1,83=219, cutoff=0.91, 91% sensitivity, 100% specificity).
Conclusions A simple approach based on ADC alone may allow the identification of tissue at risk of infarction in acute-stroke patients.
Key Words: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging penumbra stroke
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
See Editorial, page 2460
and rely on mathematical models that are still debated.11 In addition, the final size of the infarct is usually much smaller than the initial PWI/DWI mismatch area,10,13,14 and the exact prediction of infarct growth in a given patient remains extremely difficult.
Surprisingly little attention has been paid to early putative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes in the ischemic penumbra and in the at-risk tissue that will eventually evolve toward infarction. ADC changes in the core of the infarct have been extensively studied.11,1518 In this area, a marked decrease in ADC results in a bright DWI hypersignal, which has become the hallmark of recent ischemic stroke. Yet, more subtle ADC changes remain invisible on DWI, and an early moderate decrease in ADC may occur in a true penumbra.7,19 In both animals and humans, a reversal of the DWI hypersignal or of ADC changes has been reported after extremely rapid reperfusion,20,21 confirming that ADC decrease may occur in reversible ischemic injury.2224 On the basis of these considerations, we tried to ascertain whether ADC thresholds within the first 6 hours after stroke onset could help to predict infarct growth and final infarct size, and we compared the accuracy of the prediction based on ADC thresholds with that based on PWI quantitative measurements.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MRI Protocol
At the acute phase (mean delay between MRI and symptom onset 3.2±1.2 hours, range 1.4 to 6 hours), the MRI (1.5T Signa Echospeed scanner, GE Medical System) included a FLAIR, DWI, bolus tracking PWI, and magnetic resonance angiogram of the Willis circle. A follow-up MRI included a FLAIR sequence (mean 36±18 hours, range 24 to 96 hours after the first examination). All images were acquired in the anterior commissureposterior commissure plane with 5-mm slice thickness, 0.5-mm gap, 24x24-cm2 field of view, and 24 slices enabling whole brain coverage. The acquisition parameters of the fast FLAIR sequence were as follows: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE)/inversion time (TI) 10 002/148/2200 ms, matrix 256x160. A T2-weighted baseline acquisition (b=0 s/mm2) and diffusion-weighted images were acquired with a single-shot, echo-planar, spin-echo sequence (TR/TE 4500/95 ms, matrix 96x64). The diffusion trace images were calculated from 3 diffusion-weighted acquisitions with the diffusion gradients sequentially applied along each of the 3 orthogonal axes and with b=1000 s/mm2,
=32 ms,
=39 ms, and gradient amplitude=22 mT/m. The perfusion-weighted images were acquired by using the dynamic first-pass bolus-tracking method and a single-shot, echo-planar, gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE 2300/30 ms, matrix 96x64). A dose of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA (Magnevist, Schering AG) was injected at a rate of 10 cm3/s into a peripheral vein through an 18-gauge catheter by using a magnetic resonance compatible power injector (Spectris, Medrad Inc), followed by a 30-cm3 saline flush. The sequence duration was 46 seconds.
Data Processing
All images were processed on an independent workstation (Sun Ultra 1/200, Sun Microsystems) by using custom software (Research System Inc).25
Regions of Interest
All images were spatially coregistered to the first acquisition of the perfusion-weighted sequence to superimpose the regions of interest (ROIs) delineated on each type of image. The concentration-versus-time curves were fitted to a
variate function to create parametric maps.25 The apparent mean transit time (apMTT) map, defined as the first moment of the measured tissue curve, was the only parametric perfusion map used to draw ROIs. Two neuroradiologists, blinded to other images and clinical symptoms, independently drew 3D ROIs by manual contouring on each slice: (1) the abnormal bright area on the initial DWI images, (2) the area with a prolonged apMTT on the initial apMTT map, and (3) the abnormal bright area on the follow-up FLAIR images. The ROI on the follow-up FLAIR images was redrawn in cases of large edematous infarcts so that the ROI matched the same anatomic area without edema. A PWI/DWI mismatch was considered present whenever the apMTT volume/DWI volume ratio exceeded 1.1 and the apMTT volume minus the DWI volume exceeded 1.5 cm3. We obtained quantitative diffusion and perfusion measurements (see below) in 4 pathophysiological types of ROIs derived from the initial 3 sets of ROIs as follows: (1) the DWI ROI was the volume of initial DWI abnormalities and was considered to represent the ischemic core; (2) the final volume of the infarct (INFfinal) ROI was the volume of final FLAIR abnormality and was considered as an index of the final infarct size; (3) the infarct growth ROI (IGR) was the difference between INFfinal and DWI ROIs and therefore corresponded to the at-risk region, because initially it was normal on DWI but evolved to infarction on follow-up FLAIR images; and (4) the oligemic area (OLI) was the apMTT minus the INFfinal ROI and corresponded to the part of the mismatch area that remained viable (see Figure). The DWI, INFfinal, IGR, and OLI volumes were calculated as the sum of the area of the ROIs on each slice multiplied by the slice thickness plus the interslice gap. Mirror symmetrical regions were called mirror DWI, mirror IGR, and mirror OLI.
|
Quantitative Diffusion and Perfusion Measurements
ADC maps were created from 2-point analysis on a pixel basis by use of Functool 1.9j software. ADC values were thresholded at 1200 mm2/s to minimize partial volume effect with the cerebrospinal fluid, and the previously defined ROIs were copied onto the ADC maps. As suggested by others,7,15,26,27 ADC ratios (ADCrs) were obtained to minimize the influence of the cerebrospinal fluid. They were calculated by dividing each ADC value measured in the infarcted hemisphere by the symmetrical ROI. Quantitative measurements of CBF, cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT), obtained after extraction of the arterial input function, have been reported previously,14 and only data useful for comparison with ADC measurements are reported in the present study. Last, quantitative measurements were obtained in DWI and INFfinal ROIs >1 cm3 and in IGR and OLI ROIs >1.5 cm3 to minimize errors related to image coregistration and ROI drawing. Because of these size limitations, we obtained 47 DWI, 14 IGR, and 38 OLI measurements.
Statistical Analysis
Reproducibility
Excellent interobserver correlation for quantitative volume and perfusion measurements using the same methodology has been reported elsewhere.14 Interobserver reliability for ADC values for each ROI was in all cases >93%. The volumes and the ADC, CBF, CBV, and MTT values reported in the results were averaged from the measurements obtained by the 2 observers.
Descriptive Statistics
We first compared ADC values obtained in the 4 ROIs (DWI, INFfinal, IGR, and OLI) to mirror ROIs by using paired Student t test because data were normally distributed. We then compared, within the infarcted side, DWI with IGR ADC values and IGR with OLI ADC values. Three subgroups of patients were defined according to infarct evolution: group 1, infarct extension >1.5 cm3 and 5%; group 2, stable infarct size; and group 3, infarct size reduction >1.5 cm3 and 5%. In these 3 subgroups of patients, the ADC values in DWI and OLI areas were compared by using ANOVA.
Discriminant Analysis
The aim was to determine whether early ADC and ADCr threshold values could predict infarct growth and final size and to compare ADC-based predictions with hemodynamic-based predictions on the basis of quantitative CBF, CBV, and MTT. Therefore, monovariate discriminant analyses testing IGR versus OLI and INFfinal versus OLI were generated for each variable.
Effect of Stroke Onset to MRI Delay
The time dependence of ADC values in each ROI was tested by using a linear correlation test. In addition, the difference between ADC values in patients imaged within 3 hours and in those imaged between 3 and 6 hours after stroke onset was tested by using a nonparametric Wilcoxon test because data were not normally distributed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ADC Values in the Different ROIs
As shown in Table 1, absolute ADC and ADCr values gradually increased from the core to the periphery of the ischemic lesion. The absolute ADC values statistically differed from those on the contralateral side for both DWI (P<<0.001) and IGR (P=0.01) but not for the OLI region (P=0.07). Paired comparisons within the infarcted side showed significant differences in ADC and ADCr values between INF and IGR (P<<0.001, n=14) and between IGR and OLI (P=0.001, n=14). In the contralateral hemisphere, ADC values were not statistically significantly different (mirror INF 812±46x10-6 mm2/s, mirror IGR 829±43x10-6 mm2/s, and mirror OLI ROIs 829±40x10-6 mm2/s).
|
Infarct Growth Subgroups
As stated above, 14 patients had an apparent infarct growth (group 1), 29 had a stable lesion (group 2), and the remaining 5 had a partially reversible lesion (group 3). The ADC values were significantly different in the DWI region, being lower in group 1 (630±68x10-6 mm2/s) than in group 2 (667±59x10-6 mm2/s) and group 3 (725±40x10-6 mm2/s) (P=0.047, F2,44=3.28). The same trend (P=0.08) was observed for ADCr. Conversely, ADC values were similar in the OLI areas of the 3 groups (group 1, 835±45x10-6 mm2/s; group 2, 814±38x10-6 mm2/s; and group 3, 832±45x10-6 mm2/s).
Discriminant Analysis
The IGR versus OLI discriminant analysis (Table 2) showed that the fate of the mismatch region was predicted as accurately by ADC measurements as by CBF or CBV measurement. The best prediction was achieved with the ADC ratio, which correctly classified 84% of the regions, followed by CBF, absolute ADC, and CBV, all of which classified only 65% of the regions correctly. The INFfinal versus OLI discriminant analysis (Table 3) showed that the final size of the infarct was predicted more accurately by ADCr (95% of correct predictions) and ADC (88%) than by CBF (74%), CBV (72%), or MTT (58%). The ADC threshold value generated by the model was 748x10-6 mm2/s. This threshold was almost identical in the patients with infarct growth (group 1, 746x10-6 mm2/s) and the patients with stable or regressing lesions (groups 2 and 3, 749x10-6 mm2/s).
|
|
Time Course of ADC Change
The only significant effect of time was a negative correlation between absolute ADC value and time in the DWI ROI (r=-0.24, P=0.005). Twenty-seven patients were imaged within 3 hours after stroke onset, and 21 patients were imaged 3 to 6 hours after stroke onset. There was no statistical difference in terms of age, European Stroke Scale score, initial infarct volume, or relative or absolute ADC values, although the latter tended to be lower in the 3- to 6-hour group (DWI 641±64x10-6 mm2/s, IGR 748±117x10-6, and OLI 822±45x10-6) than in the <3-hour group (DWI 677±67x10-6 mm2/s, IGR 809±32x10-6 mm2/s, and OLI 825±40x10-6 mm2/s).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ADC Prediction of Infarct Growth
To address this issue, we divided a posteriori the PWI/DWI mismatch area into OLI (eventually noninfarcted) and IGR (eventually infarcted although normal on the initial DWI) regions. An OLI region was found in 79% of the patients, consistent with the fact that a PWI/DWI mismatch is a frequent finding in acute stroke and often remains uninfarcted. Conversely, an IGR region was found in only 29% of the patients, indicating that in a majority of patients, the initial DWI abnormality could approximate the final infarct size and that only
1/3 of the patients are at risk of infarct growth. The main finding was that ADC values differed between OLI and IGR regions. They were normal in the OLI regions and mildly but significantly decreased in the IGR regions (6% mean decrease). The ADC values have only seldom been measured in the PWI/DWI mismatch area, but Schlaug et al7 recently reported a mild reduction of ADCr in the IGR in 25 patients imaged up to 24 hours. Interestingly, the decrease in ADC (9%) was only slightly more marked than in the present study, suggesting that these subtle ADC changes surrounding the visible DWI abnormality may last longer that the classic 3- to 6-hour therapeutic window. The pathophysiological significance remains controversial. Schlaug et al suggested that these subtle ADC changes may reflect the presence of a subset of neurons with impaired ionic membrane gradients due to ATP depletion. However, experimental data suggest that a mild ADC decrease may reflect severe tissue acidosis or cortical spreading depression occurring in the penumbra22 rather than impairment of energy balance.19 This is supported by the fact that ATP depletion with subsequent neuronal death occurred only in association with a more marked ADC reduction (
10%).19,29
It has recently been shown that the distribution of ADC values was strongly correlated with the severity of perfusion deficit.18 In our sample of patients, discriminant analysis showed that ADC thresholds predicted IGR or OLI outcome as well or slightly better than MRI quantitative CBF and CBV thresholds. However, the accuracy of the prediction remained moderate, because only 65% of the regions were correctly classified by ADC or CBF absolute values. This reflects the mild degree of ADC decrease in the IGR region and the overlap between IGR and OLI individual values. It may also more fundamentally reflect the unpredictable outcome of the ischemic penumbra. To optimize the predictions, very recently, a pixel-by-pixelbased analysis conducted on 14 regions showed that the combination of DWI and PWI assesses the risk of infarction better than does DWI or PWI alone.30
ADC Prediction of Final Size of the Infarct
We sought to determine whether ADC-based prediction of the final size of the infarct could be more accurate than the more subtle prediction of the IGR compartment. The INF versus OLI discriminant analysis generated an ADC threshold value of 748x10-6 mm2/s and an ADCr threshold value of 0.91, which correctly predicted 88% and 95% of the regions, respectively. This high accuracy is explained by the fact that the moderate ADC decrease in the IGR was combined with lower ADC values in the core of the infarct in patients with growing infarcts. Compared with prediction based on hemodynamic parameters, ADC-based prediction was more accurate and statistically more robust, with 5 to 10 times higher F values. We verified that the ADC thresholds were almost identical in the subgroups of patients with and without infarct growth. This suggests that an ROI-based prediction of the final size of the infarct could be performed prospectively without knowledge of the initial perfusion abnormalities and of the final tissue outcome. Finally, although the final size of the infarct corresponded to a heterogeneous region on the initial MRI inasmuch as it included the core of already infarcted tissue and the infarct growth area, it should be noted that a comparison of the initially visible qualitative DWI abnormality with the size of the computed quantitative ADC ROI may help to predict the extent of the true at-risk tissue. In other words, the ADC/DWI mismatch may be more efficient than the PWI/DWI mismatch at predicting the risk of infarct growth.
Limitations of the Study
The present study has some limitations. First, we defined the IGR and OLI regions partly retrospectively by using information not only from the initial MRI but also from the follow-up scan at days 2 to 4, which might not always represent the true final infarct.31 Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings. Second, our patients did not receive thrombolytic treatments and are thus fairly representative of the natural course of ischemic stroke. Yet, part of the DWI hypersignal might be reversible in patients who underwent successful thrombolysis.21 Consequently, the IGR area might not embrace the entire potentially salvageable ischemic tissue if normal perfusion is rapidly restored. Conversely, the reversibility of the moderate ADC decrease found in the IGR area needs to be verified.20 Thus, the present ADC thresholds need to be compared with those in patients who received thrombolytics. Finally, it might be argued that the ADC threshold probably depends on the time elapsed after onset. Like Schlaug et al,17 we observed a moderate correlation between the time after onset and the ADC decrease in the core of the infarction. However, IGR and OLI ADC values were not significantly related to time. Because these results were based on different patients, the time dependence of ADC could have been masked by individual variations. Nevertheless, the lack of a clear-cut time dependence of the ADC values at the hyperacute stage32 suggests that the ADC thresholds could be equally valid during the first 6 hours after stroke.
Conclusions
We have shown that (1) ADC values are marginally but significantly decreased in the area of infarct growth; (2) ADC in the area that spontaneously escapes from infarction remains normal; and (3) ADC thresholds may be proposed to identify the at-risk tissue for individual patients. These results constitute a preliminary step toward a full characterization of the ischemic penumbra by using ADC alone. With further refinements, including data on diffusion anisotropy26,33 and improvement in ADC after processing,16,18,30 quantitative DWI might provide key data for rapidly predicting infarct growth in acute-stroke patients.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 14, 2001; revision received July 6, 2001; accepted August 9, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Tourdias, V. Dousset, I. Sibon, E. Pele, P. Menegon, J. Asselineau, C. Pachai, F. Rouanet, P. Robinson, G. Chene, et al. Magnetization Transfer Imaging Shows Tissue Abnormalities in the Reversible Penumbra Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3165 - 3171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Oppenheim, C. Lamy, E. Touze, D. Calvet, M. Hamon, J.-L. Mas, and J.-F. Meder Do transient ischemic attacks with diffusion-weighted imaging abnormalities correspond to brain infarctions? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1782 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-S. Loh, K. S. Butcher, M. W. Parsons, L. MacGregor, P. M. Desmond, B. M. Tress, and S. M. Davis Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Thresholds Do Not Predict the Response to Acute Stroke Thrombolysis Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2626 - 2631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Koga, D. C. Reutens, P. Wright, T. Phan, R. Markus, B. Pedreira, G. Fitt, I. Lim, and G. A. Donnan The Existence and Evolution of Diffusion-Perfusion Mismatched Tissue in White and Gray Matter After Acute Stroke Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2132 - 2137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-D. Heiss, J. Sobesky, and V. Hesselmann Identifying Thresholds for Penumbra and Irreversible Tissue Damage Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11_suppl_1): 2671 - 2674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Kidwell, J. R. Alger, and J. L. Saver Evolving Paradigms in Neuroimaging of the Ischemic Penumbra Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11_suppl_1): 2662 - 2665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Mitsias, J. R. Ewing, M. Lu, M. M. Khalighi, M. Pasnoor, H. B. Ebadian, Q. Zhao, S. Santhakumar, M. A. Jacobs, N. Papamitsakis, et al. Multiparametric Iterative Self-Organizing MR Imaging Data Analysis Technique for Assessment of Tissue Viability in Acute Cerebral Ischemia AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2004; 25(9): 1499 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Na, V. N. Thijs, G. W. Albers, M. E. Moseley, and M. P. Marks Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Acute Ischemia: Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Signal Intensity Thresholds in Predicting Tissue at Risk and Final Infarct Size AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2004; 25(8): 1331 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fiehler, T. Kucinski, K. Knudsen, M. Rosenkranz, G. Thomalla, C. Weiller, J. Rother, and H. Zeumer Are There Time-Dependent Differences in Diffusion and Perfusion Within the First 6 Hours After Stroke Onset? Stroke, September 1, 2004; 35(9): 2099 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-D. Heiss, J. Sobesky, U. v. Smekal, L. W. Kracht, F.-G. Lehnhardt, A. Thiel, A. H. Jacobs, and K. Lackner Probability of Cortical Infarction Predicted by Flumazenil Binding and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Signal Intensity: A Comparative Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Early Ischemic Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1892 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bykowski, L. L. Latour, and S. Warach More Accurate Identification of Reversible Ischemic Injury in Human Stroke by Cerebrospinal Fluid Suppressed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): 1100 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fiehler, K. Knudsen, T. Kucinski, C. S. Kidwell, J. R. Alger, G. Thomalla, B. Eckert, O. Wittkugel, C. Weiller, H. Zeumer, et al. Predictors of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Normalization in Stroke Patients Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 514 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Kidwell, J. R. Alger, and J. L. Saver Beyond Mismatch: Evolving Paradigms in Imaging the Ischemic Penumbra With Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2729 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Schaefer, Y. Ozsunar, J. He, L. M. Hamberg, G. J. Hunter, A. G. Sorensen, W. J. Koroshetz, and R. G. Gonzalez Assessing Tissue Viability with MR Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2003; 24(3): 436 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Arenillas, A. Rovira, C. A. Molina, E. Grive, J. Montaner, J. Alvarez-Sabin, and K.-O. Lovblad Prediction of Early Neurological Deterioration Using Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted Imaging in Hyperacute Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke * Editorial Comment Stroke, September 1, 2002; 33(9): 2197 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Parsons, P. A. Barber, S. M. Davis, V. Thijs, and G. W. Albers Relationship between severity of MR perfusion deficit and DWI lesion evolution Neurology, June 11, 2002; 58(11): 1707 - 1707. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Muir Heterogeneity of Stroke Pathophysiology and Neuroprotective Clinical Trial Design Stroke, June 1, 2002; 33(6): 1545 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||